jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

ohjokj] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 1st March, 2018

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2012-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Daler Khan s/o Shri Nazir Khan, r/o

Village Bhadyar, P.O. Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had submitted his demand

notice dated 04-10-2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

14&jkti=@2018&19&04&2018

¼613½

614

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour

Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute

amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where

after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh

vested with the powers of appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had

raised the industrial dispute at a belated stage after period of more than 11years from the date of his

alleged illegal termination and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated

16-03-2012 for adjudication;

And whereas Shri Daler Khan s/o Shri Nazir Khan agitated the above orders of declining of

reference for adjudication of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon’ble High

Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 2646/2013. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal

Pradesh has dismissed the civil writ petition on 18-06-2013. Thereafter, Shri Daler Khan s/o Shri

Nazir Khan agitated the Judgment of the Hon’ble High Court dated 18-06-2013 before the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India vide Civil Appeal No. 18012-18013 of 2017 (Special Leave Petition (C)

Nos. 30103-30104 of 2017). The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has decided the Civil Appeal

(above) on 06-11-2017. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows ;

“5. Therefore, these appeals are allowed with a direction to respondent No.-1 that the

cases of the appellants shall also be considered for reference, ignoring the objection in

the matter of delay.

6. Needful be done within two months from the date of production of a copy of this

judgment.”

Therefore, in view of above Judgment / directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,

the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide

Himachal

Pradesh

Government

Notification

No.

Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose,

dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) make a reference to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal,

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal

adjudication;

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Daler Khan s/o Shri Nazir Khan, r/o Village

Bhadyar, P.O. Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 07-07-2005

without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and

justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of

compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

615

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Dharam Chand s/o Shri Kikar Singh,

r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 23-07-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the

same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report

under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of after about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 13-11-2014;

And whereas Shri Dharam Chand s/o Shri Kikar Singh agitated the above orders of

declining of reference before the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 250/

2016. The Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on

23-02-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, in terms of the

judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in a batch of writ

petitions, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State

Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced

as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider

the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision

within eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested in me

vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th

February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial

Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for

legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Dharam Chand s/o Shri Kikar Singh,

r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during

October, 1988 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District

Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as Beldar and has raised his industrial

dispute after nearly 23 years vide demand notice dated 23-07-2011, without complying

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,

keeping in view of delay of nearly 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what

amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-

worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

616

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 6th March, 2018

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2012-Mandi.—Whereas Smt. Guddi Devi w/o Shri Krishan Chand,

r/o Village Putlipald, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had submitted her

demand notice dated 03-02-2009 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the

Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. The

Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial

dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings,

where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour

Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh

vested with the powers of appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had

raised the industrial dispute at a belated stage after period of nearly 9 years from the date of her

alleged illegal termination and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated

17-03-2012 for adjudication;

And whereas Smt. Guddi Devi w/o Shri Krishan Chand agitated the above orders of

declining of reference for adjudication of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the

Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 2646/2013. The Hon’ble High Court of

Himachal Pradesh has dismissed the civil writ petition on 18-06-2013. Thereafter, Smt. Guddi Devi

w/o Shri Krishan Chand agitated the Judgment of the Hon’ble High Court dated 18-06-2013 before

the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India vide Civil Appeal No. 18012-18013 of 2017 [Special Leave

Petition (C) Nos. 30103-30104 of 2017]. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has decided the

Civil Appeal (above) on 06-11-2017. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“5. Therefore, these appeals are allowed with a direction to respondent No.-1 that the

cases of the appellants shall also be considered for reference, ignoring the objection in

the matter of delay.

6. Needful be done within two months from the date of production of a copy of this

judgment.”

Therefore, in view of above Judgment / directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,

the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me

vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) make a reference to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal,

Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal

adjudication;

“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Guddi Devi w/o Shri Krishan Chand, r/o

Village Putlipald, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f.

01-06-2000 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is

legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and

617

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above

employer?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 27th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Hoshiyar Singh s/o Shri Babu Ram,

r/o Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand

notice dated 23-07-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive

Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation

Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the

same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report

under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P. ;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of after about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 13-11-2014;

And whereas Shri Hoshiyar Singh s/o Shri Babu Ram agitated the above orders of declining

of reference before the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 404/2016. The

Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the civil writ petition on 01-03-2016 and

directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The

writ petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending

applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested in me

vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hoshiyar Singh s/o Shri Babu Ram, r/o

Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during December,

1988 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who

had worked on daily wages as Beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 23

618

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

years vide demand notice dated 23-07-2011, without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of after

about 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past

service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th March, 2018

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2014-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kewal Singh s/o Shri Retho Ram, r/o

Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice

dated 23-07-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer,

H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer,

Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same

could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report

under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala,

District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as

appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a

belated stage of more than 24 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order

dated 12-12-2014;

And whereas Shri Kewal Singh s/o Shri Retho Ram agitated the above orders of declining

of reference before the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 406/ 2016. The

Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 02-03-2016 and

directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment, dated

30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in a batch of writ petitions, CWP

No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and

others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

“3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within

eight weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.”

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested in me

vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated

15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following

issue/issues for legal adjudication;

619

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

“Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Kewal Singh s/o Shri Retho Ram, r/o

Village Dev Bharari, P.O. Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during April, 1987

by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had

worked on daily wages as Beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 24

years vide demand notice dated 23-07-2011, without complying the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of

more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,

past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer/management?”

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

ou foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 24 ekpZ] 2018

la[;k ,Q0,Q0bZ0&ch&,Q¼14½85@2013-&&bl vf/klwpuk esas vUr%LFkkfir vuqlwph esa fofufnZ’V ou

Hkwfe@catj Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ljdkj rFkk izkbZosV O;fDr;ksa ds vf/kdkjksa ds Lo:i vkSj foLrkj dh tkap

dj yh xbZ gS vkSj mUgsa Hkkjrh; ou vf/kfu;e] 1927 ¼1927 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 29 dh

mi /kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu ;Fkk visf{kr vfHkfyf[kr dj fy;k gS(

mDr vuqlwph esa nf'kZr ou Hkwfe@catj Hkwfe ljdkj dh lEifRr gS] ;k ftl ij ljdkj ds

lkaifrd vf/kdkj gSa ;k ljdkj mldh ou mit ds lEiw.kZ ;k fdlh Hkkx dh gdnkj gS(

vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 29 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ?kks"k.kk djrs gSa fd mDr vf/kfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ds micU/k mDr ou Hkwfe@

catj Hkwfe dks ykxw gksaxs vkSj tks ,rn~Ik'pkr~ iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 29 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ ds micU/kksa

ds v/khu ^^lajf{kr ou^^ dgyk,xh A

vuqlwph

Øe

la[;k

ufLr

la[;k

ou dk uke

ftls lhekafdr

lajf{kr ou esa

ifjofrZr

fd;k tkuk

visf{kr gS

gncLr

uEcj

lfgr

eqgky

dk uke

[kljk

uEcj

{ks=

gSDVs;j

esa

eq[; lhek,a

egky@mi&egky

ifj{ks=

e.My

ftyk

41@1995

tew Fkkp

Mdksyw

226@1] 233@1]

256@1] 257@1]

259@1

fdÙkk-- 5

33&45&05

mRrj% tkew Fkkp

nf{k.k% Mdksyw

iwoZ% Mhih,Q [kwMyw

if'pe% cxS.k

dqekj

lSu

dksVx<+

f'keyk

vkns'k }kjk]

r:.k diwj]

vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo ¼ou½A

620

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. FFE-B-F(14)-85/2013 dated

24^th March, 2018 as required under Article 348 (3) of the Constitution of India].

FORESTS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 24^th March, 2018

No. FFE-B-F(14)-85/2013.—Whereas the nature and extent of the rights of the

Government and of private persons in or over the Forest Land/Waste Land specified in the

schedule inserted to this Notification have been enquired into and recorded as required under sub-

section (3) of Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act No. 16 of 1927);

And whereas the Forest Land/Waste Land shown in the said schedule is the property of the

Government or over which the Government has proprietary rights or the Government is entitled to

the whole or any part of the Forest Produce therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 29 of the

Act ibid, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to declare that the provisions of Chapter-IV of

the Act shall apply to the said Forest Land/Waste Land and shall hereafter be called as “Protected

Forests” under the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Act ibid.

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

File No.

Name of

Forest

required

to be

converted into

Demarcated

Protected

Forests

Name of

Muhal with

Hadbast

No.

Khasra No.

Area in

Hectt.

Cardinal Boundaries

Muhal/ Up-Muhal

Forest

Range

Forest

Division

District

41/1995

Jamu Thach

Dakolu

226/1, 233/1,

256/1, 257/1,

259/1

Kitta.. 5

33-45-05

North : Jamu Thach

South : Dakolu

East : DPF Khudalu

West : Bagain

Kumar

Sain

Kotgarh

Shimla

By order,

TARUN KAPOOR,

Additional Chief Secretary (Forests).

__________

ou foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 24 ekpZ] 2018

la[;k% ,Q0,Q0bZ0&ch&,Q¼14½86@2013-&&bl vf/klwpuk esas vUr%LFkkfir vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V

ou Hkwfe@catj Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ljdkj rFkk izkbZosV O;fDr;ksa ds vf/kdkjksa ds Lo:i vkSj foLrkj dh

621

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

tkap dj yh xbZ gS vkSj mUgsa Hkkjrh; ou vf/kfu;e] 1927 ¼1927 dk vf/kfu;e la[;kad 16½ dh /kkjk 29

dh mi /kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu ;Fkk visf{kr vfHkfyf[kr dj fy;k gS(

mDr vuqlwph esa nf'kZr ou Hkwfe@catj Hkwfe ljdkj dh lEifRr gS] ;k ftl ij ljdkj ds

lkaifrd vf/kdkj gSa ;k ljdkj mldh ou mit ds lEiw.kZ ;k fdlh Hkkx dh gdnkj gS(

vr% fgekpy izns'k ds jkT;iky] iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 29 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr

'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, ?kks"k.kk djrs gSa fd mDr vf/kfu;e ds v/;k;&4 ds micU/k mDr ou Hkwfe@

catj Hkwfe dks ykxw gksaxs vkSj tks ,rn~Ik'pkr~ iwoksZDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 29 dh mi&/kkjk ¼2½ ds micU/kksa

ds v/khu ^^lajf{kr ou^^ dgyk,xh A

vuqlwph

Øe

la[;k

ufLr

la[;k

ou dk uke

ftls

lhekafdr

lajf{kr ou

esa

ifjofrZr

fd;k tkuk

visf{kr gS

gncLr

uEcj

lfgr

eqgky

dk uke

[kljk

uEcj

{ks=

gSDVs;j

esa

eq[; lhek,a

egky@

mi&egky

ifj{ks=

e.My

ftyk

7@1993

MekbZ

mi egky

ptksy

1@1] 310@1]

332@1] 333@1]

348@1] 369@1

fdÙkk-- 6

35&28&59

mRrj% Hkw.kk

nf{k.k% ptksy

iwoZ% ptksy

if'pe% dkaxy

dqekj

lSu

dksVx<+

f'keyk

vkns'k }kjk]

r:.k diwj]

vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo ¼ou½A

&&&&&&&

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. FFE-B-F(14)-86/2013 dated

24^th March, 2018 as required under Article 348 (3) of the Constitution of India].

FORESTS DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 24^th March, 2018

No. FFE-B-F(14)-86/2013.—Whereas the nature and extent of the rights of the

Government and of private persons in or over the Forest Land/Waste Land specified in the

schedule inserted to this Notification have been enquired into and recorded as required under sub-

section (3) of Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act No. 16 of 1927);

And whereas the Forest Land/Waste Land shown in the said schedule is the property of the

Government or over which the Government has proprietary rights or the Government is entitled to

the whole or any part of the Forest Produce therein;

622

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 19 vizSy] 2018@29 pS=] 1940

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 29 of

the Act ibid, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to declare that the provisions of

Chapter-IV of the Act shall apply to the said Forest Land/Waste Land and shall hereafter be called

as “Protected Forests” under the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Act ibid.

SCHEDULE

Sl.

No.

File No.

Name of

Forest

required

to be

converted

into

Demarcated

Protected

Forests

Name of

Muhal

with

Hadbast

No.

Khasra No.

Area in

Hectt.

Cardinal

Boundaries

Muhal/Up-Muhal

Forest

Range

Forest

Division

District

7/1993

Damai

Muhal

Chajol

1/1, 310/1,

332/1, 333/1,

348/1, 369/1

Kitta.. 6

35-28-59

North: Bhuna

South: Chajol

East: Chajol

West : Kangal

Kumar

Sain

Kotgarh

Shimla

By order,

TARUN KAPOOR,

Additional Chief Secretary (Forests).

_________

ou foHkkx

vf/klwpuk

f'keyk&2] 24 ekpZ] 2018

la[;k% Q0,Q0bZ0&ch&,Q¼14½87@2013-&&bl vf/klwpuk esas vUr%LFkkfir vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V