jkti=] fgekpy izns'k
fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr
ohjokj] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
fgekpy izns'k ljdkj
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 15th March, 2018
No.
11-2/93(Lab)
ID/2018/Baddi/Pankaj.—Whereas
the
Labour
Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Baddi Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
52&jkti=@2018&07&06&2018
¼2369½
2370
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
Sh. Pankaj Kumar s/o Sh. Trilochan, r/o Village & P.O. Kitoli, Tehsil & Distt. Kangra, H. P. C/o
Sh. Satish Kumar, President, H. P. AITUC, Distt. Committee Solan H. Q. House No. 276, Phase
III, Housing Board, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H. P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/s Captab, Biotech
Unit-II, Plot No. 125, EPIP Phase-I, Jharmajri, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H. P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers of the appropriate Govt. vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.
Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute
to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Pankaj Kumar s/o Sh. Trilochan, r/o Village &
P. O. Kitoli, Tehsil & Distt. Kangra, H. P. C/o Sh. Satish Kumar, President, H. P. AITUC,
Distt. Committee Solan H. Q. House No. 276, Phase III, Housing Board, Baddi, Distt. Solan
w.e.f. 09-10-2015 by the management of M/s Captab, Biotech Unit-II, Plot No. 125, EPIP
Phase-I, Jharmajri, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H. P. without complying with the provisions
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including
reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the
above ex-worker is entitled to from the above management?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 14th March, 2018
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/2018/Baddi/Pradeep Kumar.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Pradeep Kumar s/o Sh. Puran Chand,
Village Khamari, P. O. Kohbag, Tehsil & Distt. Shimla, H. P. and The Factory Manager,
M/s Astral Poly Technik Ltd., Village Bated, P. O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan-173205,
H. P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
2371
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether demand of Sh. Pradeep Kumar s/o Sh. Puran Chand, Village Khamari, P. O.
Kohbag, Tehsil & Distt. Shimla, H. P. for reinstatement of his services and payment of
salary from 14-4-2015 onwards, before the management of M/s Astral Poly Technik Ltd.,
Village Bated, P. O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan-173205, H. P., after receiving
full and final amount of Rs. 1,13,009/- from the above management, is legal and justified?
If yes, what relief the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the said management
and if not, its effects?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 24th March, 2018
No. 11-1/86(Lab) ID/2018/Nahan-Carlberg.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between The President & General Secretary,
Carlberg Workers Union, Registration No. 1179, Village Tokiyon, P. O. Sainwala, Tehsil Paonta
Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H. P. Vs The Managing Director, M/s Carlberg India Pvt. Ltd., Village
Tokiyon, P. O. Sainwala, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
2372
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether demands raised by the President & General Secretary, Carlberg Workers Union,
Registration No. 1179, Village Tokiyon, P. O. Sainwala, Tehsil Paonta sahib, Distt.
Sirmour, H. P. vide demand notice dated 04-6-2017 (Copy Enclosed) before the Managing
Director, M/s Carlberg India Pvt. Ltd., Village Tokiyon, P. O. Sainwala, Tehsil Paonta
Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H. P. for fulfilling, are legal and justified? If yes, what relief in terms
of above demand notice the concerned workmen are entitled to from the above
management?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 15th March, 2018
No.
11-2/93(Lab)
ID/2018/Solan/Rakesh.—Whereas
the
Labour
Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Solan Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
Sh. Rakesh Kumar s/o Sh. Chait Ram, V.P.O. Deothi, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H. P. Vs. The
Registrar, LLR Group of Institutes, Village Jabli-Kyar, P. O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
1. “Whether termination of services of Sh. Rakesh Kumar s/o Sh. Chait Ram, V.P.O.
Deothi, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H. P. by The Registrar, LLR Group of Institutes, Village
Jabli-Kyar, P.O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan (H. P.) w.e.f. 16-11-2016 without
complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
2373
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority,
past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the
above employer ?”
2.
“Whether action of the management of M/s LLR Group of Institutes, Village Jabli-
Kyar, P. O. Oachghat, Tehsil & Distt. Solan (H. P.) to engage the services of a new
incumbent without paying legal dues to the previous senior workman i.e. Sh. Rakesh
Kumar s/o Sh. Chait Ram, V.P.O. Deothi, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H. P., is legal and
justified? If not, what relief and other service benefits the above aggrieved workman is
entitled to from said employer/institute?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 7th March, 2018
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/2018/Baddi/Rodu Ram.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rodu Ram s/o Sh. Ghanna Ram,
Village Khanger, P. O. Salnu, Tehsil Sadar, Distt. Bilaspur, H. P. and The Factory Manager, M/s
Astral Poly Technik Ltd., Village Bated, P.O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan-173205, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether demand of Sh. Rodu Ram s/o Sh. Ghanna Ram, Village Khanger, P. O. Salnu,
Tehsil Sadar, Distt. Bilaspur, H. P. for reinstatement of his services and payment of salary
from 14-4-2015 onwards, before the management of M/s Astral Poly Technik Ltd., Village
Bated, P. O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan-173205, H. P., after receiving full and
2374
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
final amount of Rs. 80,048/- from the above management, is legal and justified? If yes, what
relief the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the said management and if not, its
effects?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 24th March, 2018
No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2018/Solan/Sarla Sharma.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Sarla Sharma w/o Sh. Vidya Dutt,
Sher Singh Bhawan, Sher Singh Colony, Sector-2, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, H. P. Vs The Factory
Manager, M/s Real Care Science, Orion Industrial Complex Opp. Sector-6, NH-22,
Parwanoo-173220, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Sarla Sharma w/o Sh. Vidya Dutt, Sher Singh
Bhawan, Sher Singh Colony, Sector-2, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan (H. P.) w.e.f. 24-2-2017 by
the Factory Manager, M/s Real Care Science, Orion Industrial Complex Opp. Sector-6, NH-
22, Parwanoo-173220, H. P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount
of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is
entitled to from the above management?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
2375
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2018
No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2018/Baddi/Vijay.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation
Officer, Baddi Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Sh. Shiv Kumar
s/o Sh. Gurdyal Singh, r/o Village Sitomajra, P. O. Nankpur, Tehsil Kalka, Distt. Panchkula,
Haryana C/o Sh. Satish Kumar, President, H. P. AITUC, Distt. Committee Solan H. Q. House No.
276, Phase III, Housing Board, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H. P. Vs The Managing Director, M/s Captab,
Biotech Unit-II, Plot No. 125, EPIP Phase-I, Jharmajri, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Shiv Kumar s/o Sh. Gurdyal Singh, r/o Village
Sitomajra, P. O. Nankpur, Tehsil Kalka, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana C/o Sh. Satish Kumar,
President, H. P. AITUC, Distt. Committee Solan H. Q. House No. 276, Phase III, Housing
Board, Baddi, Distt. Solan w.e.f. 09-10-2015 by the Managing Director, M/s Captab,
Biotech Unit-II, Plot No. 125, EPIP Phase-I, Jharmajri, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H. P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
management?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
2376
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 15th March, 2018
No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2018/Baddi/ Surjeet Kumari.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-
Conciliation Officer, Baddi Circle, Distt. Solan has submitted a report as provided u/s 12(4) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between
Smt. Surjeet Kumari w/o Sh. Dharam Pal, r/o Village Illewal, P. O. Golthai, Tehsil Sh. Naina Devi
Ji, Distt. Bilaspur, H.P. C/o Sh. Satish Kumar, President, H. P. AITUC, Distt. Committee Solan
H. Q. House No. 276, Phase III, Housing Board, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. Vs. The Managing
Director, M/s Captab, Biotech Unit-II, Plot No. 125, EPIP Phase-I, Jharmajri, Tehsil Baddi, Distt.
Solan, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested
under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is
required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers of appropriate Government, vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification
No. Shram(A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute
to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal
adjudication on the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of the services of Smt. Surjeet Kumari w/o Sh. Dharam Pal, r/o
Village Illewal, P. O. Golthai, Tehsil Sh. Naina Devi Ji, Distt. Bilaspur, H. P. C/o Sh. Satish
Kumar, President, H. P. AITUC, Distt. Committee Solan, H. Q. House No. 276, Phase III,
Housing Board, Baddi, Distt. Solan w.e.f. 09-10-2015 by the management of M/s Captab,
Biotech Unit-II, Plot No. 125, EPIP Phase-I, Jharmajri, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H. P.,
without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and
justified? If not, what relief including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past
service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above
management?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 7th March, 2018
No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/2018/Baddi/Swaroop.—It appears to the undersigned that an
industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Swaroop Singh s/o Sh. Devia Ram,
2377
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
Village Taggi, P. O. Surara, Tehsil & Distt. Chamba, H. P. with the Factory Manager, M/s Astral
Poly Technik Ltd., Village Bated, P. O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan-173205, H. P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether demand of Sh. Swaroop Singh s/o Sh. Devia Ram, Village Taggi, P. O. Surara,
Tehsil & Distt. Chamba, H. P. for reinstatement of his services and payment of salary from
14-4-2015 onwards, before the management of M/s Astral Poly Technik Ltd., Village
Bated, P. O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan-173205, H. P., after receiving full and
final amount of Rs. 90,938/- from the above management, is legal and justified? If yes, what
relief the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the said management and if not, its
effects?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 6th April, 2018
No. 11-1/86(Lab)ID/2018/Nahan/Anjana.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial
dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Anjana w/o Sh. Raj Kumar, r/o Mohalla Rani
Taal, 44/8, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H. P. and (1) The General Secretary, Bal Kalyan Parishad,
H.P. Kraig Garden, Shimla-2, H.P., (2) The Child Development Project Officer, Nahan, Distt.
Sirmour, H.P.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that
during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and
amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts
for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said
dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial
dispute.
2378
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of
Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that there exist
an industrial dispute between the above parties which requires legal adjudication.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising
the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-
Loose, dated 15-2-2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Ld. Labour
Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on
the following issue/issues:—
“Whether termination of services of Smt. Anjana w/o Sh. Raj Kumar, r/o Mohalla Rani
Taal, 44/8, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H. P. by the General Secretary, Bal Kalyan
Parishad, H. P. Kraig Garden, Shimla-2 (H. P.) w.e.f. 31-5-2017 without complying with the
provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief
including reinstatement, amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and
compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?”
Sd/-
Joint Labour Commissioner.
_________
LFkkuh; ys[kk ijh{kk foHkkx
vf/klwpuk
f”keyk&171009] 02 twu] 2018
la[;k% 1&479@96&fQu¿,y0,0À[k.M&2&3998-&&fgekpy izns”k ds jkT;iky] LFkkuh; ys[kk
ijh{kk foHkkx] fgekpy izns”k dh vf/klwpuk la[;k% 1&479@96&fQu¿,y0,0À[k.M&1] fnukad
19&12&2013 dk vf/kØe.k djrs gq, foHkkx esa dk;Zjr efgykvkas ds ;kSu mRihM+u ds ekeykasa ds fuiVkjs
gsrq fuEu izdkj ls lfefr ds xBu dh lg"kZ ?kks"k.kk djrs gSa %&
1- Jherh fueZyk oekZ] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
+ + v/;{kk
2- Jherh deyk pkSgku] dfu"B ys[kk ijh{kd
+ + lnL;
3- Jherh deyk nsoh] fyfid
+ +lnL;
gLrk{kfjr@&
vfrfjDr eq[; lfpo (foRr)A
2379
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTICE
Shimla-2, the 4th June, 2018
No. LLR-E(9)-8/2018-Leg.—WHEREAS, Shri Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, r/o Riviera
Retreat, Village Badah, P. O. Mohal, Tehsil and District Kullu, H. P. has applied for appointment
of Notary Public in Sub-Division Kullu of District Kullu (H. P.) under rule 4 of the Notaries Rules,
1956.
THEREFORE, I undersigned in exercise of the power conferred vide Government
Notification No. LLR-A(2)-1/2014-Leg. dated 1st July, 2017, hereby issue notice under rule 6(2)(b)
of the Notaries Rules, 1956, for the information of general public for inviting objections, if any,
within a period of seven days from the date of publication of this notice in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette),
H. P. against his appointment as a Notary Public in Sub- Division Kullu of District Kullu (H.P.).
Sd/-
(Competent Authority),
DLR-cum-Deputy Secretary (Law-English).
________
LAW DEPARTMENT
NOTICE
Shimla-2, the 4th June, 2018
No. LLR-E(9)-8/2018-Leg.—WHEREAS, Smt. Vibhanshu Thakur, Advocate, r/o V.P.O.
Piplage, Tehsil Bhunter, District Kullu, H. P. has applied for appointment of Notary Public in Sub-
Division Kullu of District Kullu (H. P.) under rule 4 of the Notaries Rules, 1956.
THEREFORE, I undersigned in exercise of the power conferred vide Government
Notification No. LLR-A(2)-1/2014-Leg. dated 1st July, 2017, hereby issue notice under rule 6(2)(b)
of the Notaries Rules, 1956, for the information of general public for inviting objections, if any,
within a period of seven days from the date of publication of this notice in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette),
H.P. against her appointment as a Notary Public in Sub- Division Kullu of District Kullu (H.P.).
Sd/-,
(Competent Authority),
DLR-cum-Deputy Secretary (Law-English).
2380
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh] rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k
Jh Thupten Jigme
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsjs /kkjk 13¼3½ fgekpy izns'k iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turkA
Jh Thupten Jigme iq= Jh Nawang Tempa, fuoklh Dal Lake Dharamshala] rglhy /keZ'kkyk]
ftyk dkaxM+k us bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdÌek nk;j fd;k gS fd mldh Lo;a ¼Thupten
Jigme) dh tUe fnukad 22&08&1978 gS ijUrq ,e0lh0 Dharamshala esa tUe iathd`r u gS vr% bls
iathd`r fd;s tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tk;saA bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa
dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr Thupten Jigme dk tUe iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs
dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og viuk ,rjkt gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 07&06&2018 dks vlkyru ;k odkyru
gkftj vkdj is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfcd 'kiFk&i= tUe frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k
ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 26&05&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
/keZ'kkykA
&&&&&&&&
c vnkyr uk;c rglhynkj o v[kR;kjkr] lgk;d lekgrkZ] f}rh; Js.kh ,oa dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+k] fg0 iz0
c eqdíek %
Jherh Dolkar
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 13¼3½ fgekpy izns'k iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-
uksfVl cuke vke turkA
Jherh Dolkar iq=h Late Tenzin, fuoklh Gha Dong Dharamshala] rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk
dkaxM+k us bl vnkyr esa 'kiFk&i= lfgr eqdÌek nk;j fd;k gS fd mlds iq= dk uke Tenzin
Wangdak dk tUe fnukad 07&10&1985 gS ijUrq uxj fuxe@dSUV cksMZ@xzke iapk;r Dharamshala esa
tUe iathd`r u gSA vr% bls iathd`r fd;s tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tk;saA bl uksfVl ds }kjk leLr turk
dks rFkk lEcfU/kr lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr iq= Tenzin Wangdak
dk tUe iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og gekjh vnkyr esa fnukad 07&06&2018 dks
vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vkdj viuk ,rjkt is'k dj ldrk gS vU;Fkk eqrkfcd 'kiFk&i= tUe
frfFk iathd`r fd;s tkus ckjs vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;s tk;saxsA
vkt fnukad 19&03&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh]
rglhy /keZ'kkyk] ftyk dkaxM+kA
2381
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
U;k;ky; mi iathdk/;{k ,oa rglhynkj HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fgekpy izns'k
fely ua0 % W-1/2018
fnukad % 25&05&2018
Jh rksr jke iq= Jh csn jke iq= Jh txr jke] fuoklh xkao Nk'k.kh] Mkd?kj HkzS.k] rglhy HkqUrj
ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&olh;r iathdj.k ckjsA
mijksDr fo"k; ds lEcU/k esa Jh rksr jke iq= Jh csn jke iq= Jh txr jke] fuoklh xkao Nk'k.kh]
Mkd?kj HkzS.k] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fgekpy izns'k us v/kksgLrk{kjh ds U;k;ky; esa vkosnu i= nk;j
fd;k gS fd mlds lxs HkkbZ us ,d olh;rukek fnukad 13&12&2014 dks :c:xokgku rgjhj djok;k gS
ysfdu mDr olh;rukek dks fdlh dkj.ko'k iath—r ugha djok ldk rFkk vc iath—r djokuk pkgrk
gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj jkti= ds }kjk vke turk o lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd vxj
of.kZr olh;rukek dks iath—r djus esa dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og viuk mtj ,oa ,rjkt fnukad
24 twu] 2018 dks lqcg 10-00 cts rd vlkyru ;k odkyru is'k djsaA fe;kn xqtjus fnukad
24&06&2018 ds fdlh izdkj dk mtj@,rjkt tsjs lek;r u gksxk rFkk vke turk ds fo#) ,drjQk
dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tkdj layXu olh;rukek dks iath—r djus ds vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA
vkt fnukad 25&05&2018 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh fd;k x;kA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
mi iathdk/;{k ¼uk0 rglhynkj½]
HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A
&&&&&&&
In the Court of Shri Raman Gharsanghi ( H.A.S.), Special Marriage Officer-cum-
Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
1.
Sh. Vinod Kumar s/o Shri Dharam Prakash, resident of House No. 172, Ward No.5,
Manu Market Manali, P.O. & Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H.P.
and
2.
Smt. Shweta Dixit d/o Sh. Rishi Pal Sharma (presently wife of Sh. Vinod Kumar),
resident of House No. 172, Ward No. 5, Manu Market Manali, P.O. and Tehsil Manali, District
Kullu, H.P. . . Applicants.
Versus
General Public
2382
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
Subject.—An Application for registration of marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Whereas Sh. Vinod Kumar s/o Shri Dharam Prakash, resident of House No. 172, Ward
No.5, Manu Market Manali, P.O. & Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H.P. and Smt. Shweta Dixit
daughter of Sh. Rishi Pal Sharma (presently wife of Sh. Vinod Kumar) resident of House No. 172,
Ward No. 5, Manu Market Manali, P.O. and Tehsil Manali, District Kullu, H.P. has presented an
application on dated 17-05-2018 in this court for the registration of the marriage under Special
Marriage Act, 1954 hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of General Public
that if any person have any objection for the registration of the above marriage can appear in this
court on 16-06-2018 at Manali to object registration of above marriage personally or through any
authorised agent failing which the marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the court 23rd day of May, 2018.
Seal.
RAMAN GHARSANGHI (HAS),
Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] rglhy ckyhpkSdh] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½
fely uEcj % 06@08&03&2018
Jh enu izdk'k iq= Jh izse flag] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj ?kkV] rglhy ckyhpkSdh] ftyk e.Mh]
fgekpy izns'kA
cuke
vke turk
fo"k;-&&jktLo fjdkMZ esa uke n#Lrh ckjs vkosnu&i= A
Jh enu izdk'k iq= Jh izse flag] fuoklh xkao o Mkd?kj ?kkV] rglhy ckyhpkSdh] ftyk e.Mh
¼fg0 iz0½ us ,d vkosnu&i= e; 'kiFkh i= bl vk'k; ds lkFk xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke xzke iapk;r
?kkV ds fjdkMZ esa enu izdk'k ntZ gS ysfdu jktLo foHkkx ds fjdkMZ eqgky ?kkV@675 esa xyrh ls enu
yky ntZ gqvk gSA vc izkFkhZ jktLo fjdkMZ esa xzke iapk;r ?kkV ds fjdkMZ ds vk/kkj ij enu izdk'k ntZ
djokuk pkgrk gSA
vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk loZlk/kkj.k turk o fgrc) O;fDr;ksa dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr
uke dks n#Lr djus ckjs fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks dksbZ vkifŸk gks rks og fnukad 29&06&2018 dks ;k blls
iwoZ v/kksgLrk{kjh ds le{k vlkyru ;k odkyru mifLFkr gksdj viuh vkifŸk ntZ dj ldrk gSA blds
i'pkr~ dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt dkfcys lek;r ugha gksxk rFkk vkosnu&i= ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh vey esa
ykbZ tk,xhA
vkt fnukad 28&05&2018 dks esjs nLr[kr o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
rglhy ckyhpkSdh] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A
2383
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
In the Court of Niraj Chandla (HPAS), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Urban),
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
Shri Inderjeet Singh son of Shri Puran Chand, resident of Rajiv Cottage, Khalini, Tehsil
and District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
..Applicant.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Shri Inderjeet Singh son of Shri Puran Chand, resident of Rajiv Cottage, Khalini,
Tehsil and District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has preferred an application to the undersigned for
registration his son namely HARSH BHUMAIK (09-03-2006) at above address in the record of
Municipal Corporation Shimla.
Therefore, this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having
any objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in
this court on or before 29-06-2018 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of
date and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 30th day of May, 2018.
Seal.
NIRAJ CHANDLA (HPAS),
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Shimla (Urban), Distt. Shimla.
__________
c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh] tyksx] mi&rglhy tyksx]
ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0
okn la[;k % 1-XIII-B-1/18
rkjh[k ejtqvk % 07&03&2018
Jh dqyk jke iq= Jh vuUr jke] fuoklh egky piMkuh] ijxuk ljkt] mi&rglhy tyksx]
ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0A
cuke
vke turk
nj[okLr cjk, n#Lrh ukeA
gjxkg [kkl o vke dks ctfj;k uksfVl lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd Jh dqyk jke iq= Jh vuUr jke]
fuoklh egky piMkuh] ijxuk ljkt] mi&rglhy tyksx] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0 us bl U;k;ky; esa
izkFkZuk&i= xqtkj dj fuosnu fd;k gS fd mldk uke jktLo fjdkMZ ekStk piMkuh esa dqyk nr ntZ gS
tks fd xyr ntZ gqvk gS ijUrq Ldwy izek.k&i=] udy ifjokj jftLVj rFkk vk/kkj dkMZ esa dqyk jke
iq= Jh vuUr jke ntZ dkxtkr gS tks fd lgh o lR; gSA izkFkhZ us ekStk piMkuh ds jktLo fjdkMZ esa
lgh uke ntZ djus gsrq izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr fd;k gSA
2384
jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 07 twu] 2018@17 T;s"B] 1940
vr% bl izkFkZuk&i= ckjs vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks uke n#Lr
djus esa dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og viuk ,rjkt fyf[kr :i esa fnukad 26&06&2018 vFkok blls iwoZ bl
U;k;ky; dks izLrqr djsA rnksijkUr dksbZ vkifÙk ekU; u gksxhA
gekjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls vkt fnukad 25&05&2018 dks tkjh gqvkA
eksgjA
gLrk{kfjr@&
lgk;d lekgrkZ f}rh; Js.kh]
tyksx] ftyk f'keyk] fg0 iz0A
fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr
bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS