jkti=] fgekpy izns'k

fgekpy izns'k jkT; 'kklu }kjk izdkf'kr

lkseokj] 8 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

fgekpy izns'k ljdkj

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

A-Section

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 8th March, 2019

No. Ind-A(B)8-4/2016.—On the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion

Committee, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the promotion of following

Managers, DIC to the post of General Manager, DIC/ Deputy Director of Industries (Class-I,

07&jkti=@2019&08&04&2019

¼207½

208

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

Gazetted) in the pay scale of `10300—34800+ `5400 Grade pay in the Department of Industries,

H.P. with immediate effect :—

Sl. No.

Name of Official

Smt. Promila Devi

Smt. Chhime Angmo

The above Officers shall remain on probation for a period of two years. They shall also

exercise option for fixation of pay under the provisions contained in FR-22, within a period of one

month from the date of issue of this Notification.

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to order the posting/transfer of

following General Managers, DIC, with immediate effect, in public interest:—

Sl.

No.

Name of Officer/

Official

From

Sh. Pawan Kumar

District Industries Centre, Kullu

District

Industries

Centre,

Chamba against vacancy.

Smt. Promila Devi

O/o District Industries Centre,

Bilaspur

District

Industries

Centre,

Bilaspur on her promotion.

Smt. Chhime

Angmo

O/o District Industries Centre,

Mandi

District

Industries

Centre,

Kullu on her promotion.

The above mentioned Officers are directed to report for duty at their new place of posting

immediately and send joining report to this Department as well as to the Director of Industries,

Himachal Pradesh, Udyog Bhawan, Shimla (through proper channel).

By order,

MANOJ KUMAR,

Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

__________

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

A-Section

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 8th March, 2019

No. Ind-A(B)8-4/2016.—In partial modification to this department’s notification of even

no. & dated 8-3-2019, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to post Sh. Pawan Kumar,

presently posted as General Manager, District Industries Centre, Kullu and under transfer to

District Industries Centre, Chamba; to District Industries Centre, Lahaul & Spiti at Keylong against

vacancy, with immediate effect, in public interest.

209

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

The above mentioned Officer is directed to report for duty at his new place of posting

immediately and send joining report to this Department as well as to the Director of Industries,

Himachal Pradesh, Udyog Bhawan, Shimla (through proper channel).

By order,

MANOJ KUMAR,

Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

_________

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

A-Section

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 8th March, 2019

No. Ind-A(B)8-2/2018.—On the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion

Committee, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the promotion of following

Industrial Promotion Officer/Superintendent Grade-II, to the post of Manager (DIC) (Class-II,

Gazetted) in the pay scale of `10300-34800+ `4400 Grade pay in the Department of Industries,

H.P. with immediate effect:—

Sl. No.

Name of Official

Sh. Rajeev Kumar, IPO

Sh. Chouhan Singh, Supdt. Grade-II

The above Officers shall remain on probation for a period of two years. They shall also

exercise option for fixation of pay under the provisions contained in FR-22, within a period of one

month from the date of issue of this Notification.

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to order the posting/transfer of

following Managers, DIC, with immediate effect, in public interest:—

Sl.

No.

Name of

Officer

From

S/Sh.

Sunny Grack,

(on contract basis)

District

Industries

Centre,

Mandi (presently deployed at

Directorate of Industries).

Directorate of Industries [his

salary may be drawn against the

vacant post of Sr. Technical

Officer (Chemical) till further

orders].

Rajeev Kumar

O/o SWCA, Baddi, Distt. Solan

District Industries Centre, Mandi

against

Sr.

No.

his

promotion.

Chouhan Singh

O/o District Industries Centre,

Solan.

District Industries Centre, Nahan

on his promotion.

210

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

The above mentioned Officers are directed to report for duty at their new place of posting

immediately and send joining report to this Department as well as to the Director of Industries,

Himachal Pradesh, Udyog Bhawan, Shimla (through proper channel).

By order,

MANOJ KUMAR,

Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

_________

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

CORRIGENDUM

Shimla-2, the 5th April, 2019

No. Ind.-A(B)8-4/2016.—Please read Pay Scale of General Manager DIC/Deputy Director

of Industries (Class-I Gazetted) as " `15600—39100+5400 Grade Pay" instead of " `10300—

34800+ 5400 Grade Pay" in the notification of even number dated 08th March, 2019.

By order,

Sd/-

Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

_________

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 26^th March, 2019

No. Shram(A)6-1/2019 (Awards) Shimla.—In exercise of the powers vested under

section 17 (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Governor Himachal Pradesh is pleased

to order the publication of awards of the following cases announced by the Presiding Officer,

Labour Court Shimla on the website of the Department of Labour & Employment Government

of Himachal Pradesh.

Sl. No

Reference/

Application

Title

Section

Ref. 90/2018

Sh. Misser Chand V/s Tarsem Bharti, Prop M/s R. P.

Appliances, Shoghi District Shimla (H.P.).

Ref. 161/2017

Chet Ram V/s The secretary, HPSEB Ltd., Vidyut

Bhawan, Chaura Maidan Shimla, H.P & Anr.

Ref. 31/2017

Himalayan International School Workers Union V/s

Himalayan International School, Chharabra, Shimla

(H.P.).

By order,

NISHA SINGH, IAS

Addl. Chief Secretary (Lab. & Emp.).

211

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

IN THE COURT OF SH. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH, PRESIDING JUDGE, H.P.

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA

Reference No :

90 of 2018

Instituted on :

1-6-2018

Decided on :

19-1-2019

Misser Chand s/o Late Shri Jagat Ram, c/o Shri D. D. Mehta, GPO Shimla,

District Shimla, H.P.

. .Petitioner.

Tarsem Bharti, Prop. M/s R. P. Appliances Unit-II, Plot No. 85/1, Industrial Area

Shoghi, District Shimla, H.P.

. .Respondent.

Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

For petitioner : Shri Rahul Kashyap, Advocate.

For respondent : Ex-parte.

AWARD

The following reference has been received for adjudication from the appropriate

government:

“Whether termination of the services of Shri Missar Chand s/o Late Shri

Jagat Ram c/o Shri G. D. Mehta, GPO Shimla-171001 during the month of June

2016 by Shri Tarsem Bharti, Prop. R. P. Appliances, Unit-II, Plot No. 85/1,

Industrial Area Shoghi, District Shimla, H.P. allegedly, without complying with

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not,

what relief including reinstatement, amount of backwages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

management?”

The case set-up by the petitioner in the statement of claim is that he was engaged

as a Supervisor in April, 2014 in the Bharti Filling Station and thereupon after April, 2015

came to be appointed as an Accountant and Manager in R. P. Appliances, Industrial Area,

Shoghi, Shimla. He continued to work as such till 7-6-2016, when he had received a legal

notice dispensing with his services.

Per the petitioner, the notice of discharge so received alleged that the

petitioner had left the firm without any information. The respondent had also noticed

major anomalies in the stocks maintained by the petitioner. While replying to the said

notice, the petitioner had submitted that he had maintained the stock and accounts of the

firm till March, 2016 and thereafter one Rinku Ram had been maintaining the same.

It is further averred by the petitioner that though he was engaged on ` 40,000/- per

month, but, he was always paid salary @ of ` 15,000/- per month. His services have been

dispensed with in gross violation of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has

completed 240 days in each calendar year.

212

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

It is further averred by the petitioner that the respondent had issued a cheque

amounting to ` Ten Lakhs Eighty Nine Thousand only (` 10,89,000/-) against the pending

salary upto June, 2017 but the aforesaid cheque was dishonored and the case is pending

before the Learned JMIC-II Shimla. The petitioner thus prays that the respondent may be

directed to re-engage him and pay his entire salary.

The respondent management in its wisdom thought it prudent not to appear,

despite having being served. They were set ex-parte vide an order dated 3-10-2018

passed by my Ld. Predecessor. The tracking report issued by the postal department un-

equivocally shows that the registered letter had been duly delivered to the respondent.

However he chose not to context the proceedings.

The question which arises for determination may be cast thus:

Whether the termination of the petitioner is in violation of the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as alleged and as such is illegal and unjustified? If

so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?

. .OPP.

Relief

Having considered the pleadings, evidence and other attendant materials placed

on record my findings on the issues framed above are thus:

Issue No. 1: Partly-yes

Relief :

Partly allowed as per the operative part of the award

REASONS FOR FINDINGS

Issue No.1:

The petitioner while appearing as PW-1 has tendered his affidavit Ex. PW-1/A and

reiterated the submissions made in the statement of claim.

10. Per the petitioner, he was initially engaged as a Supervisor in April, 2014 in

Bharti Filling Station and after April, 2015, he came to be appointed as an Accountant/

Manager in the respondent firm, known in the name and style R. P. Appliances and his

services had been dispensed with vide legal notice Mark P-1.

11. Per the petitioner, the discharge was punitive in nature as certain allegations

regarding anomalies in the stocks were highlighted by the respondent which had been duly

controverted by the petitioner in his reply, Mark P-2. While filing reply, the petitioner had

made it clear to the respondent that after April, 2016 one Rinku Ram was maintaining the

stocks and accounts of the firm.

12. The petitioner has also deposed that he had completed 240 days in each calendar

year. Though, he has further testified that he demanded salary and EPF from respondent firm

vide Annexure P-3 (which is though not placed on record). However, the respondent firm

prepared false entry in the stock register merely to harass and terminate his services.

13. The deposition of the petitioner has gone un-rebutted as the respondent chose

not to contest the proceedings. The un-rebutted testimony of the petitioner shows that he had

213

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

been working with the respondent firm. The said fact is further fortified by the legal notice

issued by the respondent firm to the petitioner on 7-6-2016 (Mark P-1). The test and tenor of

the legal notice undoubtedly is punitive, as it alleges certain misconduct to the petitioner and

one Rinku Ram. It is further suggestive of the fact that the petitioner is alleged to have left

the firm on his own and the respondent apparently intended to initiate criminal proceedings

under section 420 IPC and other penal provisions and hence, the notice. As to what

transpired thereupon cannot be made out from the record. However, the petitioner had

responded by replying to the aforesaid notice vide Mark P-2. He has denied his involvement

in the entire episode and rather fastened it on one Rinku Ram.

14. The conjoint reading of the deposition of the petitioner and Mark P-1 and Mark

P-2, on record, does prove that the petitioner had been working with the respondent firm. No

doubt, some penal action was intended to be initiated against the petitioner, but, there is

nothing on record to remotely suggest that the services of the petitioner were terminated

after some enquiry, either for some misconduct or for un-authorized absence from duty.

The un-rebutted deposition of the petitioner also suggest that he had completed 240

days in each calendar year and the said factum has also gone un-rebutted. There is

nothing on record to remotely suggest that the provisions of Section 25-F was adhered to by

the respondent firm. The statutory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act has been given

a complete go bye by the respondent firm. He was indeed entitled to the protection

envisaged under section 25-F and having failed to do so, the respondent firm has made itself

amenable to re-engage the petitioner forth-with. The petitioner has nowhere submitted in his

testimony that he was not ably employed during the said interregnum and as such he shall

not be entitled to any back -wages for the aforesaid period.

15. For all the aforesaid reasons discussed hereinabove, it is held that the

termination of the petitioner was in violation of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947, more particularly Section 25-F. The termination is held to be illegal, unlawful

and unjustified. As a sequel thereto, the petitioner is directed to be re-instated forth-with,

though, without any back-wages. Issue is decided accordingly.

Relief :

For all the reasons discussed hereinabove the reference is partly allowed. The

termination of the petitioner is held to be illegal and unjustified being violative of the

provisions of section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. As a sequel the respondent

firm is directed to re-engage the petitioner forth-with though without back-wages. The

petitioner shall however be entitled to seniority and continuity in service. The reference is

answered accordingly. A copy of this award be sent to the appropriate Government for

publication in the official gazette and the file after completion be consigned to records.

Announced in the open court today this 19^th day of January, 2019.

Sd/-

(CHIRAG BHANU SINGH),

Presiding Judge,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Shimla.

214

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

IN THE COURT OF SH. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH, PRESIDING JUDGE, H.P.

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA

Ref. No. 161 of 2017

Instituted on 2-11-2017

Decided on 19-1-2019

Chet Ram s/o Shri Sita Ram r/o Village Panden, P.O. Khera, Tehsil Sunni, District

Shimla, H.P.

. .Petitioner.

The Secretary HPSEB Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Chaura Maidan, Shimla, H.P.

The Senior Executive Engineer, electrical Division, HPSEBL, Sunni, District

Shimla, H.P.

. .Respondents.

Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

For petitioner : Shri Narinder Sharma, Advocate.

For respondents :

Shri Ramakant Sharma, Advocate.

AWARD

The following reference was received for adjudication from the appropriate

government:

“Whether demand of Shri Chet Ram s/o Shri Sita Ram, Village Paden, P.O.

Khera, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla H.P. vide demand notice dated nill (copy

enclosed) before the Secretary, Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd.,

Vidyut Bhawan, Chaura Maidan Shimla, H.P. for reinstatement of his services

alongwith seniority and consequently regularization is legal and justified? If yes,

what relief including reinstatement, amount of back-wages, seniority, past service

benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above

employer?”

The case of the petitioner, as it emerges from the statement of claim is that he

was initially engaged on daily wage basis with the respondent board in 1993 and he

worked as such in Sunni Division, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, H.P. Apart from the

petitioner, many other persons had been engaged by the respondent board on daily wages.

The board thereupon terminated the services of the petitioner, despite having retained many

juniors to him. The board is also stated to have appointed many fresh hands after his

termination, which was in clear cut violation of the provisions of sections 25-F, G and H of the

Industrial Disputes Act.

It is further the case of the petitioner that he had challenged his termination

before the Learned H.P. State Administrative Tribunal. The OA being 1631/1998. In pursuance

to and interim order passed by the said Tribunal, he continued working on daily wages till

2002. It however, transpired that the OA preferred by the petitioner was however returned for

want of jurisdiction. However, in the mean time the respondent board had issued a

215

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

communication dated 6-11-2002, converting the services of the petitioner to work charge.

The communication thereof has been annexed as Annexure A-1 (Ex. PW-1/A).

It seems despite the said communication having been issued, the petitioner was not

conferred the status of a work charge and as such he was again constrained to file an OA before

the Learned Administrative Tribunal, which came to be transferred to Hon’ble High Court as

CWP (T) No. 8918/2008, on the scraping of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal. The

Hon’ble High Court, while deciding the aforesaid writ petition vide order dated

1-12-2010, allowed the petitioner to approach the respondent Board. The board having been

directed by the Hon’ble High Court to extend the similar treatment to the petitioner, in

case junior to the petitioner had been retained by the respondent board.

It is further the case of the petitioner, that certain similar situated persons had

been re-engaged by the respondents either directly or on the basis of the awards passed by

this Court. One of them being reference No. 13/2006 titled as Gopal Singh Vs.

Executive Engineer, has been annexed alongwith by the petitioner as Annexure A-2.

It is further averred by the petitioner that in-spite of directions issued by the

Hon’ble High Court on 1-12-2010 [vide CWP(T) No. 8918/2008], the respondent board did

not consider the case of the petitioner and he was again constrained to file a Civil Writ

Petition No. 4894/2011 and the Hon’ble High Court vide an order dated 28-3-2016,

permitted the petitioner to raise a demand in view of order dated 6-11-2002, before the

Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer and hence the present reference.

The petitioner thus eventually averred that the termination was illegal and bad in

the eyes of law being violative of the provisions of The Industrial Disputes Act, more so, as

persons junior to the petitioner had been retained by the respondent board namely one Dharam

Dass and Gopal Dass. They had also been granted work charge status by the respondent,

whereas the services of the petitioner had been illegally terminated. The petitioner thus

seeks reinstatement in service alongwith all consequential benefits including back-wages.

While contesting the claim, the respondent board inter-alia raised preliminary

objections vis-a-vis maintainability, non joinder and mis-joinder of necessary parties and the

petitioner having not approached this Tribunal with clean hands. The respondent board has

also raised the objection relating to limitation. Per the respondents, the petitioner worked on

muster roll basis uptill 21-3-1998 and till that time he had worked for only 150 days with

the board. The petitioner had worked till 16-4-2002 on the strength of the stay order granted

by the Administrative Tribunal w.e.f. 15-11-1998, as directed vide OA No. 1631 of 1998.

As per the respondents, CWP No. 8918 of 2008 was disposed off by the Hon’ble High

Court vide a judgment dated 1-12-2010 and as such there is a delay of six years in

raising the Industrial Dispute after the judgment was passed by the Hon’ble High Court

and from the date of termination the delay is about eighteen years.

On merits, it is the contention of the respondent board that the petitioner was

initially engaged as a beldar on daily wage basis on 26-6-1993 and he worked as such till

21-3-1998 and that too intermittently. The petitioner had only worked for 115 days in the

first instance. It was on the strength of the interim order passed by the Ld. H.P. State

Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 1631 of 1998 that the petitioner was re-engaged w.e.f.

15-11-1998 till his termination on 16-4-2002, that is, after the disposal of OA No. 1631

of 1998, which was dismissed for want of jurisdiction and returned to the petitioner. The

petitioner was discharged by the respondent board after giving him one month’s advance

216

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

notice. The respondent board has placed on record the mandays chart of the petitioner vide

Annexure R-1 (Ex. RW-1/A).

10. Further per the respondents, the petitioner has only worked for 32 days in the year

1993, 75 days in 1994 and 8 days in 1998. The petitioner had never worked in the years, 1995,

1996 and 1997. The petitioner had never completed 240 days in any calendar year. Per the

respondents, his services were never terminated, rather, he had left the job of his own

violation and the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act are not attracted in the instant case.

The petitioner was duly discharged from his duties after giving him one month’s notice, on the

disposal of OA No. 1631 of 1998. The petitioner was thus not entitled to regularization.

11. It is further the case of the respondent that the name of the petitioner had

inadvertently appeared in the work-charge list and the mistake was bonafide. Per the

respondent, the list dated 6-11-2002 was prepared much after the petitioner had been

discharged from his service on 16-4-2002. Even, thereafter, the petitioner had approached

the Ld. H.P. State Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 3039 of 2002 and due to the

winding up of the Administrative Tribunal, the matter was transferred to the Hon’ble High

Court vide CWP(T) 8918 of 2008 and the same was disposed of on 1-12-2010 with the

directions to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent board. The petitioner

had preferred a representation and the same came to be rejected by the competent authority

on 2-4-2011 vide Annexure R-8. The rejection of the representation is stated to be just and

proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

12. The persons alleged to be juniors are said to be workmen who were in

continuous service or who had been ordered to be re-engaged by the Court. The

respondents, thus prayed that the claim being devoid of merits be dismissed.

13. While filing rejoinder, the petitioner controverted the averments in the reply

and further reiterated those in the statement of claim.

14. On 4-5-2018, the following issues had came to be framed by my Learned

Predecessor:

Whether the demand raised by the petitioner for re-instatement of his service

alongwith seniority and consequently regularization is legal and justified, as

alleged?

. .OPP.

If issue No. 1 is proved in affirmative, to what relief of monetary benefits and

other service benefits the petitioner is entitled?

. .OPP.

Whether the petition is not maintainable as alleged?

. .OPR.

Whether the petition is hit by delay and laches, as alleged?

. .OPR.

Relief:

15. Having considered the pleadings, evidence and other attendant material placed

on record, my findings on the issues framed are thus:—

Issue No. 1

Partly yes

217

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

Issue No. 2

Entitled to reinstatement with seniority and continuity but without back-

wages.

Issue No. 3 :

Issue No. 4 : No

Relief:

Reference answered partly in favour of the petitioner and against the

respondents per operative part of award.

REASONS FOR FINDINGS

Issues No. 1 & 2 :

16. Both the issues are being taken up together as they are correlated and

intermingled.

17. The case has a chequered history. Initially, the petitioner had approached the Ld.

H.P. State Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 1631 of 1998 and he came to be re-

engaged on 15-11-1998, in pursuance to orders passed on 6-11-1998. Eventually, the said

OA came to be disposed of on 6-3-2002. It was apparently for want of jurisdiction as the

lis was covered under the Industrial Disputes Act. After the dismissal of the said OA, the

services of the petitioner was finally done away with. It resulted in the petitioner again

approaching the Learned Administrative Tribunal vide OA No. 3039 of 2002. The matter was

transferred to the Hon’ble High Court and came to be registered as CWP(T) 8918 of 2008.

18. Hon’ble high Court directed the respondent board to consider the representation

of the petitioner, in case persons junior to him had been re-engaged. The representation also

came to be dismissed vide an order dated 2-4-2011 passed by the Executive Director

(Personal) HPSEB.

19. It was again follow by another round of litigation, when the petitioner filed

CWP No. 4894 of 2011 assailing the order dated 2-4-2011 passed by the respondent board

and also seeking similar treatment given to other similar situated/junior persons and for

implementing the office order dated 6-11-2002. It resulted in the Hon’ble High Court

allowing the petitioner to raise demand in view of order dated 6-11-2002 before the Labour-

cum-Conciliation Officer within two weeks and which has finally culminated in the present

reference.

20. Admittedly, the petitioner had never completed 240 days in any of the calendar

years. He had worked for about 32 days in 1993, 75 days in 1994 and around 8 days in the

year, 1998. Therefore, the infringement of the provisions of section 25-F do not come into

play. But, it would be relevant to point out that one Shri Gopal Singh, was engaged on

1-6-1996, Mahender Lal was engaged on 1-10-1997 and Dharam Dass had been engaged on

26-12-1993. They were thus certainly junior to the petitioner. As per the records maintained by

the respondent these three have also not put in 240 days in any of the calendar years, they

worked with the respondent board. As per Ex. PW-1/D on record, undoubtedly issued by the

respondent board themselves Gopal Singh had worked for only 128 days from 1-6-1997 to

21-3-1998, Mahender Lal had worked for 49 days for two years i.e. the years 1997-98 and

Dharam Dass had worked for 162 days from the year, 1993 till 1998 ranging from 6 days in

the year, 1993 and 82 days in 1997. Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that persons

junior to him have been retained does lend credence to the fact that the provisions of section

218

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

25-G had been violated. It is also explicitly clear from Ex. PW-1/D that none of the persons

junior to the petitioner had completed 240 days in any of the calendar years, like the petitioner,

still they were retained.

21. The respondent board while contesting the claim have not categorically denied

that persons junior to the petitioner were retained or that the principles of last come first go

was strictly followed, but, have tried to contend that the alleged juniors were either in

continuous service of the respondent board and fulfilled the eligibility criteria in accordance

with law and as such the Hon’ble Court has condoned the breaks in their service. I am

afraid, the stand taken by the respondent board is totally contrary to Ex. PW-1/D, which

clearly shows that not only the said Gopal Singh, Mahender and Dharam Dass were appointed

as daily wagers after the petitioner, but, they were never in continuous service. In fact they

were placed equally bad as the petitioner, in terms of the number of days put in, by them, as

discussed hereinabove. Even, though in the reply the respondents have contested the claim of

the petitioner on the ground of maintainability, more so, keeping in view the earlier litigations

and the petition being hopelessly barred by time, which aspect shall be separately dealt with,

in the issues to be discussed herein below.

22. It is by now well established that if a person is to be retrenched, the

employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person employed in

that category. It is also by now well settled that infraction of section 25-G, hits a

mandatory provision, and the non compliance thereof is fatal to the employer. The provisions

of section 25-G are mandatory in nature and are necessarily to be complied with, at the time

of retrenchment, even if, the workman has not completed 240 days in a calendar year. For

invoking the protection of sections 25-G and 25-H, the requirement of having completed

240 days is not a condition precedent. This proposition of law is fairly well settled and

does not require any further elucidation.

23. Even otherwise, a bare glance at the list of T-mates working in Electric Division

HPSEB, Sunni, annexed alongwith Ex. PW-2/A, wherein the workmen were ordered to be

brought on work charge ex-facie shows that there were many other people juniors to the

petitioner i.e. engaged much after him, over and apart from Gopal Singh, Mahender and

Dharam Dass. That being so while retrenching workmen, the principles of “last come, first go”

had to be scrupulously followed, which was apparently not done by the respondent board.

24. Even, as per the statement of Shri Hukam Chand (PW-2), Senior Assistant,

Electric Division Sunni, Mahender Lal was engaged on 1-10-1997 and one Gian Chand

was engaged on 1-3-1999. Shri Gurcharan Singh, Assistant Engineer, Electric Sub Division

Jalog, Tehsil Sunni, who has appeared as RW-1, has tacitly tried to state that only those juniors

of the petitioner have been reinstated, who were ordered to be re-engaged by the Court. He

has also admitted that one Jia Lal s/o Shri Wagru Ram was also engaged in the year, 1997.

25. The conjoint reading of the pleadings and the evidence discussed hereinabove,

clearly goes to show that the provisions of section 25-G were given a go bye, by the respondent

board. It being a mandatory provision was statutorily required to be followed in sum and

substance was totally ignored by the respondent board. Since, juniors to the petitioner have

been retained by the respondent, the termination of the petitioner is indeed bad in the eyes

of law, being violative of the express provisions of section 25-G of the Industrial Disputes Act.

The action of the respondent is thus illegal, unjustified and arbitrary and cannot withstand

legal scrutiny. The issue is decided accordingly. The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement

alongwith seniority and continuity but without back-wages. Seeing to the peculiar

219

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

circumstances of the case and more so the petitioner had not worked with the respondent board

during the inter regnum, no back wages are being ordered in favour of the petitioner.

Issues No. 3 & 4 :

26. Both the issues are being taken up together as they are interrelated.

27. Much has been urged by the Learned Counsel for the respondent board that the

claim is not only barred by delay and laches but it is also not maintainable keeping in view

the orders passed by the Learned HP State Administrative Tribunal and the Hon’ble High

Court from time to time. Per the Learned Counsel, the petitioner’s representation made in

pursuance to the judgment of the Hon’ble high Court on 1-12-2010 in CWP(T) No. 8918 of

2010 has attained finality as it was rejected by the respondent board and the said

rejection has never been challenged by the petitioner. He would thus contend that neither is

the claim maintainable and it is also hit by the vice of delay. I am afraid that the contentions

so raised by the Learned Counsel cannot be sustained.

28. The question of delay and laches so raised by the respondent board in fact wanes

into insignificance by virtue of the orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP No. 4894

of 2011, decided on 28-3-2016. The Hon’ble high Court allowed the petitioner to raise a

demand in view of the order dated 6-11-2002 before the Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer,

within a period of two weeks. The question thus looses all relevance. By fiction of law, the

question of limitation has become redundant and stands impliedly decided by the Hon’ble

High Court while deciding the aforesaid writ petition. It further gains significance when

one goes through the grounds espoused in the writ petition No. 4894 of 2011. It has been

filed by the petitioner challenging the rejection of his representation by the respondent board,

as a sequel to the orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP(T) No. 8918 of 2008 on

1-12-2010. Thus, it is more than clear that the orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court on

28-3-2016 in CWP No. 4894/2011 were passed in pursuance to the challenge made to the

rejection order passed by the respondent board on 1-12-2010. It has virtually revived the

cause of action of the petitioner and impliedly held that the question of delay and laches will

not come in the way of the petitioner while raising the dispute. Both these issues are thus

decided against the respondent and in favour of the petitioner.

Relief :

For the foregoing reasons discussed hereinabove supra, the reference is allowed

partly. The termination of the petitioner is held to be violative of section 25-G of the

Industrial Disputes Act. The same is accordingly set aside. The respondents are directed to

re-engage the petitioner forthwith. The petitioner shall be entitled to seniority and continuity

from the date of his illegal termination, though except back-wages. The reference is

answered accordingly. Let a copy of this award be sent to the appropriate government for

publication in the official gazette. File, after completion, be consigned to records.

Announced in the open Court today this 19^th day of January, 2019.

Sd/-

(CHIRAG BHANU SINGH),

Presiding Judge,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Shimla.

220

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

IN THE COURT OF SH. CHIRAG BHANU SINGH, PRESIDING JUDGE, H.P.

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHIMLA

Reference No. 31 of 2017

Instituted on 27-01-2017

Decided on 8-1-2019

Himalayan International School Workers Union, through its president and General

Secretary, Chharabra, District Shimla, H.P.

. .Petitioner.

M/s Himalayan International School Chharabra, Shimla, H.P.

. .Respondent.

Reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

For petitioner : Shri Niranjan Verma, Advocate.

For respondent : Ex-party.

ORDER/AWARD

By way of the present reference the appropriate Government seeks determination of

the collective demands raised by the workmen, from this Court on the following point:—

“Whether miscellaneous demands contained in demand notice dated 16-10-2015

(copy enclosed) submitted by the President and General Secretary, Himalyan

International School Workers Union, Chharabra, Shimla, H.P., raised before

and to be fulfilled by the Employer/Management/Principal, M/s Himalyan

International School, Chharabra, Shimla, H.P. are legal, justified and

maintainable? If yes, retrospectively from which date, what monetary and other

service benefits the employees/workers employed in the aforesaid establishment

are entitled to from the above employer/management?”

In pursuance to the reference the worker union in its claim have raised some

generic demands. The Union avers that the respondent/management is not adhering to the

Labour Laws in the School and are not fulfilling the lawful demands of the workers. They

were constrained to raise the dispute vide a demand notice dated 16-10-2015 U/s 2 (K) of the

Industrial Disputes Acts, but to no avail.

The demands espoused by the workers union in the demand notice and the claim

may be summarized thus:—

(i) Salary of the workers be increased by 25%

(ii) The salary of the workers be paid by 7^th day of every month

(iii) As per the service condition leave salary, Medical Facility and other facilities

be provided to the worker of the union.

(iv) Eight hours duty be implemented

221

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

(v) The additional work except the category of the worker should be banned

(vi) The drivers be provided night facilities and no overtime work should be taken

from them.

(vii) The annual increment of the workers which is not paid from the year 2005 be

paid to the workers and the arrears of the same should be paid to the workers with

immediate effect.

(viii) The arrears of two months of the salary (as increased by the Govt. from April,

2014) be paid with immediate effect.

(ix) The workers who are residing in the accommodation provided by the school

should not be disturbed and the deduction done by the Management in their

salary be stopped.

(x) That double amount be paid to the workers for their over time

(xi) An employee should not be forced to put his reliever at the time of proceeding on

leave.

The respondent management in its wisdom thought it prudent not to appear,

despite having being served. They were set ex-parte vide an order dated 23-08-2017

passed by my Ld. Predecessor. The tracking report issued by the postal department

un equivocally shows that the registered letter had been duly delivered to the respondents.

However they chose not to context the proceedings.

The question which arises for the determination may be cast thus;

Whether the demands of the workman as contained in the demand notice

dated 16-10-2015 are legal, genuine and justified, if so to what relief the

workmen are entitled to?

. .OPP.

Relief

Having considered the pleadings, evidence and other attendant materials placed on

record my findings on the issues framed above are thus:

Issue No. 1:

Partly-yes

Relief :

Partly allowed as per the operative part of the award

REASONS FOR FINDINGS

Issue No. 1:

The workers union while raising the demands on 16-10-2015 had inter-alia

sought increase in their salary by 25% further submitting that the salary be paid by 7th day of

every month, 8 hours duty be implemented and double the amount be paid to the workers

for their over time. They also sought that the increments of the workers which have not been

paid to them since 2005 be paid alongwith arrears. The drivers be provided night facilities and

no over time work be taken from them. The arrears of two months salary (as increased by the

Govt. from April, 2014) be also paid and the workers staying in the school premises be not

222

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

disturbed and no deduction be made from their salaries. The workman also espoused that

while proceeding on leave they be not forced to bring a reliever.

To substantiate the averments so made the President of the Himalayan

International School worker union, Chharabra, Shimla appeared as PW-1. Apart from placing

on record the registration certificate of the union (EX. PW-1/A) and the resolution authorizing

him to depose on behalf of the union (Ex. PW-1/B), deposed that the management did not

follow the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and the other Labour Laws. The union

had raised demand notice (Ex. PW-1/C) before the Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer Shimla

and on failure thereof the union is before this court. The respondent be directed to accept the

demands so raised by the union and the claim be allowed.

This is, but all the evidence lead by the workers union. Not only are the demands

raised by the generic, but, so is the evidence. It is shorn of any detail. Apart from a broad

and a sweeping statement that the management does not follow the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act and other Labour Laws, nothing more has been brought on record

to show the violations being made by the respondent/management. Though the reference

envisages grant of monetary and other service benefits, but there is no mention to the same

either in the claim or the evidence. The claim does not even quantify any monetary benefits

payable to the workmen.

10. In the claim petition the union has sought an increase of 25% of salary, but,

nothing has been averred nor any evidence led to show as to from when, why, and how the

increase by 25% is permissible. There is even no mention as to what are the salaries of

the workmen what are they receiving or what would be the hiked salary. It also does not

remotely show, since when the raise was payable and at what rates.

11. Having said so it does not preclude this court from taking notice of certain

provisions of the Labour Laws which are otherwise mandatorily required to be followed by

every employer, for instance the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and The

payment of Wages Act, 1936 are required to be followed in pith and substance, without any

demur. Both the Acts are germane in respect of payment of wages to the workmen. The Acts

inter-alia postulate payment of Minimum Wages, fixation of wage periods, hours for a

normal working day, overtime etc.

12. A few of the demands raised by the workmen in the demand notice dated

16-10-2015 hinge on the mandatory provisions of the aforesaid Acts. The respondents are

duty bound to respect the mandate of the two Acts and grant benefits in accruing thereof

to the petitioner union.

13. The demands raised by the workmen at Sl. No. 2, 4, 5 and 10 are required to be

adhered by the respondents strictly in consonance with the provisions of the two Acts, as

noticed hereinabove. The respondents shall grant all statutory benefits flowing to the

workmen under the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in respect of payment of

salaries before 7^th of every month and as per the fixation of normal working hours each day

and payment of over time. The analogous provisions of The Payment of Wages Act, 1936,

shall also be adhered strictly.

14. Though, the union had raised certain demands vis-a-vis grant of some annual

increments and arrears of two month salary in pursuance to some hike allegedly made from

the year, 2005 by the Government, but, strangely there is not a whisper as to what were the rate

of increment payable or when was the notification issued hiking the salaries in the year,

223

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

2005. Nothing is decipherable regarding the grant of increments and arrears of salary from

the record. In fact, nothing has been placed on record in this behalf by the union.

15. The demands raised by the union, except demands No. 2, 4, 5 and 10, thus, seem

to be embroiled in the realm of uncertainty, as no contemporaneous record has been placed

on the file. The bald statement of the President that the Labour Laws are being violated by the

respondent/management will not advance the case of the union in any way. No effort has

been made by the union to substantiate the assertions made in the claim. A non-serious

attempt, frivolous and a vexatious effort has been made by the union. There is neither an

averment nor any evidence to substantiate the same.

16. For the reasons discussed hereinabove it is held that the demands of the

workmen except demands No. 2, 4, 5 and 10 are frivolous and vexatious. However, demands

No. 2, 4, 5 and 10 will have to the addressed by the respondent/management strictly in

consonance with the provisions of The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and The Payment

Wages Act, 1936. Necessary compliances with the analogous provisions of the two

aforesaid Acts will have to ennure for the benefit of the workmen forthwith. Issue is decided

accordingly.

Relief :

For all the reasons discussed hereinabove the reference is partly allowed. The

demands of the petitions/workmen at Sl. No. 2, 4, 5 and 10 are held to be legal and valid.

Consequently the respondents shall allow all benefits arising from The Minimum Wages

Act, 1948 and The Payment of Wages Act, 1936 vis-a-vis Minimum Wages, fixation of wage

period, hours for a normal working day and overtime. Necessary statutory compliances will

be made forthwith. The reference is answered accordingly. A copy of this award be sent to the

appropriate Government for publication in the official gazette and the file after completion the

consigned to records.

Announced in the open court today this 8^th day of January, 2019.

Sd/-

(CHIRAG BHANU SINGH)

Presiding Judge,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Shimla.

___________

c vnkyr fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh] ?kqekjoha] mi&e.My ?kqekjoha] ftyk fcykliqj

¼fg0iz0½

Manish Kumar s/o Sh. Prakash Chand, Village Glah, P.O. Hatwar, Tehsil Ghumarwin,

District Bilaspur (H.P.)

2. Rekha Kumari d/o Sh. Ashok Kumar, V.P.O. Dangar, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District

Bilaspur (H.P.)

- - izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

izfroknhA

224

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ,d o nks us bl U;k;ky; esa fookg iathdj.k

djokus dk vkosnu fd;k gSA vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk o mijksDr vkosnu drkZ ds ekrk&firk

dks bl fookg ds iathdj.k ckjs ,rjkt gks rks fnukad 4&05&2019 ;k blls iwoZ izkr% 10-00 cts rd bl

U;k;ky; esa vkifÙk ntZ djok ldrs gSaA bl frfFk ds ckn dksbZ mtj Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk,xkA

vkt fnukad 06&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj ,oa eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh fd;k x;kA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

fookg iathdj.k vf/kdkjh]

?kqekjoha] mi&e.My ?kqekjoha] ftyk fcykliqj ¼fg0iz0½A

&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke oxZ MygkSth] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½

Jh fd'ku pUn iq= Jh uUrks] fuoklh HkVBh] Mkd?kj lwnyh] rglhy MygkSth] ftyk pEck]

fgekpy izns'k

- - izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

^{- -} izR;kFkhZx.kA

izkFkZuk&i= cjk, uke nq#Lrh ckjk b'rgkjA

mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= C;kugYQh ce; vU; dkxtkr bl

vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke fd'ku pUn gS vk/kkj dkMZ o ifjokj udy] xzke iapk;r lwnyh

esa esjk lgh uke fd'ku pUn ntZ gSA ysfdu esjh eydh;rh Hkwfe egky mysgM] iVokj o`Ùk nze.k esa esjk

uke Ñ".kks ntZ gS tksfd xyr gSA ftldh nq#Lrh dh tkosA

bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ds uke

nq#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru v/kksgLrk{kjh dh

vnkyr esa fnukad 23&04&2019 dks gkftj vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh

lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke nq#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 07&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

jkts'k dqekj tj;ky]

lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke oxZ]

MygkSth] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke oxZ MygkSth] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½

Jh jktho dqekj iq= Jh O;kl nso] fuoklh i/kjksVw] Mkd?kj xksyh] rglhy MygkSth] ftyk pEck]

fgekpy izns'k

- - izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

^{- -} izR;kFkhZx.kA

225

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

izkFkZuk&i= cjk, uke nq#Lrh ckjk b'rgkjA

mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= C;kugYQh ce; vU; dkxtkr bl

vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke jktho dqekj gS vk/kkj dkMZ o jk'ku dkMZ] Ldwy izek.k&i=

ifjokj udy] xzke iapk;r i/kkjksVw esa esjk lgh uke jktho dqekj ntZ gSA ysfdu esjh eydh;rh Hkwfe

egky vkj0 ,Q0 dkykVksi] iVokj o`Ùk :y;k.kh esa esjk uke latho dqekj ntZ gS tksfd xyr gSA

ftldh nq#Lrh dh tkosA

bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ds uke

nq#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru v/kksgLrk{kjh dh

vnkyr esa fnukad 23&04&2019 dks gkftj vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh

lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke nq#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 07&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

jkts'k dqekj tj;ky]

lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke oxZ]

MygkSth] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr lgk;d lekgrkZ] izFke oxZ MygkSth] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½

Jh C;ktw jke iq= Jh O;kl nso] fuoklh djsyuw] Mkd?kj cxM<kj] rglhy MygkSth] ftyk pEck]

fgekpy izns'k

- - izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

^{- -} izR;kFkhZx.kA

izkFkZuk&i= cjk, uke nq#Lrh ckjk b'rgkjA

mijksDr izkFkhZ us v/kksgLrk{kjh dh vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= C;kugYQh ce; vU; dkxtkr bl

vk'k; ls xqtkjk gS fd mldk lgh uke C;ktw jke gS vk/kkj dkMZ o jk'ku dkMZ] Ldwy izek.k&i=] ifjokj

udy] xzke iapk;r uxkyh esa esjk lgh uke C;ktw jke ntZ gSA ysfdu esjh eydh;rh Hkwfe egky uwWg]

iVokj o`Ùk uxkyh esa esjk uke jkt dqekj ntZ gS tksfd xyr gSA ftldh nq#Lrh dh tkosA

bl lEcU/k esa loZlk/kkj.k turk dks ctfj;k b'rgkj lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ ds uke

nq#Lrh ckjs ;fn fdlh dks dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru v/kksgLrk{kjh dh

vnkyr esa fnukad 23&04&2019 dks gkftj vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA gkftj u vkus dh

lwjr esa ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tk djds uke nq#Lrh ds vkns'k ns fn;s tk;saxsA

vkt fnukad 10&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

jkts'k dqekj tj;ky]

lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke oxZ]

MygkSth] ftyk pEck ¼fg0 iz0½A

226

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Devinder Kumar s/o Khushi Ram, r/o House No. 65, Ward No. 8, Hamirpur, Tehsil

& District Hamirpur (H.P.), and

Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Sh. Krishan Chand, r/o Village & P.O. Dhaneta, Tehsil

Nadaun, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

^{. .}Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Devinder Kumar & Smt. Neelam Kumari have filed an application u/s 16 of Special

Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they have stated that

they have solemnized their marriage on 31-10-1977 at House No. 65, Ward No. 8, Hamirpur,

Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.) as per Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 26-04-2019. The objection received after 26-04-2019 will not be entertained and

marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 23-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Vivek Sharma s/o Sh. Kishori Lal Sharma, r/o House No. 74, Ward No. 8,

Hamirpur, Tehsil & Distt. Hamirpur, and

Smt. Varsha Sharma d/o Sh. Rajesh Sharma, r/o V.P.O. Didwin Tikker, Tehsil and

District Hamirpur (H.P.)

^{. .}Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

227

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

Sh. Vivek Sharma & Smt. Varsha Sharma have filed an application u/s 16 of Special

Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they have stated that

they have solemnized their marriage on 25-01-2019 at House No. 74, Ward No. 8, Hamirpur,

Tehsil & Distt. Hamirpur as per Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 26-04-2019. The objection received after 26-04-2019 will not be entertained and

marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 23-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Kanchan Sharma s/o Sh. Shambhu Nath, r/o Village Kohlwin, P.O. Barin Mandir,

Tehsil Bamson, District Hamirpur (H.P.), and

Ms. Aarti d/o Gauru Ram, r/o Village Thanoty, P. O. Judera, Tehsil & District Chamba

(H.P.)

^{. .}Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice of the intended Marriage.

Sh. Kanchan Sharma and Ms. Aarti have filed an application u/s 5 of Special Marriage Act,

1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they intend to

solemnized their marriage within next three calendar months. Therefore, the General Public is

hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage

can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 22-04-2019. The

objection received after 22-04-2019 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered

accordingly.

Issued today on 16-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

228

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Sameer Khanna s/o Sh. Subhash Khanna, r/o Ward No. 5, V. P.O. Bhota, Tehsil

Barsar, District Hamirpur (H.P.), and

Sarita d/o Sh. Santosh Kumar, r/o Village Jatehari, P. O. Jhaniyari, Tehsil & District

Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice of the intended Marriage.

Sh. Sameer Khanna and Sarita have filed an application u/s 5 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they intend to solemnized

their marriage within next three calendar months. Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed

through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the

objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 22-04-2019. The objection received

after 22-04-2019 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 16-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________________________

In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Kamal Kishore s/o Sh. Rattan Chand, r/o Village Samrala, P.O. Didwin Tikker,

Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.).

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

. . Rspondent.

Subject.—Notice for proclamation late registration of date of birth as per section 13(3) in the Gram

Panchayat Tikkar Didwin record.

Whereas Sh. Kamal Kishore has filed application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration

Act,1969 alongwith relevant record pertaining to his actual date of birth i.e. 7-08-1983 which is not

entered in applicant's Gram Panchayat record inadvertently or ignorance and lack of knowledge to

applicant and his family member.

Therefore, by the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding issuing order for entry of date of birth of applicant Sh. Kamal Kishore

229

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

s/o Sh. Rattan Chand i.e. 07-08-1983 can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 18-04-2019. The objection received after will not be entertained and order will

be issued for the registration of date of birth accordingly.

Issued today under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur(H.P.).

__________

In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Babu Ram s/o Sh. Udho Ram, r/o House No. 112, Ward No. 5, Brij Nagar, Tehsil

& District Hamirpur (H.P.).

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

. . Rspondent.

Subject.—Notice for late registration of date of birth as per section 13(3) in the Gram Panchayat

Dhalot record.

Whereas Sh. Babu Ram s/o Sh. Udho Ram, r/o House No. 112, Ward No. 5, Brij Nagar,

Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.). has filed application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration

Act,1969 alongwith relevant record pertaining to his daughter Vaishali Bhatia actual date of birth

i.e. 27-06-1984 which is not entered in applicant's Municipal Committee Hamirpur record

inadvertently or ignorance and lack of knowledge to applicant and his family member. In this

regard a proclamation was published by calling objections from the general public of Municipal

Committee Hamirpur on or before 21-04-2019. The Local Registrar Birth & Death Municipal

Committee Hamirpur reported that the registration of birth of Vaishali Bhatia is to be made by the

Municipal Committee, where she was born.

Therefore by the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding issuing order for entry of date of birth of Vaishali Bhatia i.e. 27-06-

1984 can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 21-04-2019. The

objection received after will not be entertained and order will be issued for the registration of date

of birth accordingly.

Issued today on 19-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.).

230

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Smt. Usha Kumari d/o Sh. Ran Singh, r/o V.P.O. Jhaniara, Tehsil & District Hamirpur

(H.P.).

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

. . Rspondent.

Subject.—Notice for late registration of date of birth as per section 13(3) in the Gram Panchayat

record.

Whereas Smt. Usha Kumari d/o Sh. Ran Singh, r/o V.P.O. Jhaniara, Tehsil & District

Hamirpur (H.P.). has filed application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act,1969

alongwith her affidavit and relevant record pertaining to her actual date of birth i.e. 16-11-1961

which is not entered in applicant'ss Gram Panchayat record inadvertently or ignorance and lack of

knowledge to applicant and her family member. In this regard a proclamation was published by

calling objections from the general public of Gram Panchayat Bassi Jhaniara on or before

20-04-2019. The Local Registrar Birth & Death Gram Panchayat Bassi Jhaniara reported that the

registration of birth of Smt. Usha Kumari is to be made by the Gram Panchayat Bassi Jhaniara,

where she was born.

Therefore by the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding issuing order for entry of date of birth of Smt. Usha Kumari i.e.

16-11-1961 can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before

20-04-2019.

The objection received after will not be entertained and order will be issued for the

correctness of name of the applicant accordingly.

Issued today on 19-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur(H.P.).

__________

In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Smt. Kunta Devi d/o Late Sh. Tikhu Ram, r/o Village Tiyan, P.O. Uhal, Tehsil

Bamson at Tauni Devi, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

. . Rspondent.

Subject.—Notice for late registration of date of birth as per section 13(3) in the Gram Panchayat

Uhal record.

231

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

Whereas Smt. Kunta Devi d/o Late Sh. Tikhu Ram, r/o Village Tiyan, P.O. Uhal, Tehsil

Bamson at Tauni Devi, District Hamirpur (H.P.) has filed application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death

Registration Act,1969 alongwith her affidavit and relevant record pertaining to her actual date of

birth i.e. 16-07-1935 which is not entered in applicant's Gram Panchayat record inadvertently or

ignorance and lack of knowledge to applicant and her family member. In this regard a proclamation

was published by calling objections from the general public of Gram Panchayat Uhal on or before

20-04-2019. The Local Registrar Birth & Death Gram Panchayat Uhal reported that the

registration of birth of Smt. Kunta Devi is to be made by the Gram Panchayat Uhal, where she was

born.

Therefore by the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding issuing order for entry of date of birth of Smt. Kunta Devi i.e.

16-07-1935 can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 20-04-

2019.

The objection received after will not be entertained and order will be issued for the

correctness of name of the applicant accordingly.

Issued today on 19-03-2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur(H.P.).

__________

c vnkyr rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] rglhy HkqUrj]

ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 14-/NC/2019

rkjh[k is'kh % 22&04&2019

nk;j frfFk % 16&01&2019

Jh xksYMh iq= Jh izdk'k pUn iq= Jh Hkjsorw] xkao cMk+ HkqbZu] Mkd?kj o rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk

dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

^{- -} izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

- - izR;kFkhZA

fo"k;-&& nj[okLr cjk;s dkxtkr eky esa uke dh nq#Lrh ckjsA

izkFkZuk&i= Jh xksYMh iq= Jh izdk'k pUn iq= Jh Hkjsorw] xkao cM+k HkqbZu] Mkd?kj o rglhy

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0 }kjk fnukad 16&01&2019 dks bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k gS fd

mlds nknk dk uke okD;k QkVh] f'kyhgkj dksBh] dksVdUMh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0 ds

jktLo fjdkMZ esa Jh Hks[kyw ntZ gS tcfd vlyh uke Hkjsorw iq= Jh bUnz gSA vc izkFkhZ vjkth gtk ds

bUnzkt esa vius nknk dk uke Hks[kyw ls nq#Lr djds Hks[kyw mQZ Hkjsorw ntZ djuk pkgrk gSA

232

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh dks mijksDr izkFkhZ ds

nknk ds uke dh nq#Lrh dk bUnzkt djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og fnukad 22&04&2019 dks lqcg

10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gS

mlds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj uke nq#Lrh dk bUnzkt djus ds vkns'k

ikfjr dj fn;s tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 23s&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

rglhynkj ,oa lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]

rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh ,oa rglhynkj HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 18 MT/19

fnukad % 22&04&2019

nk;j frfFk % 02&03&2019

1- rqys jke iq= Jh Hkksys jke] fuoklh xkao cjk/kk ckx] Mkd?kj cjk/kk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk

dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½A

2- Jherh cks/kh nsoh iq=h Jh eksrh jke] xkao =sg.k] Mkd?kj ihiykxs] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0A

cuke

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 5¼4½ fg0 iz0 jftLVªhdj.k fu;e] 2004 fookg iathdj.k ckjsA

mijksDr ekeyk esa izkFkhZx.k us fnukad 02&03&2019 dks bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e; 'kiFk is'k

fd;s gSa fd mUgksaus fnukad 18&10&2013 dks 'kknh dj yh gS vkSj rc ls nksuksa irh&iRuh ds :i esa jgrs

pys vk jgs gSaA ijUrq izkFkhZx.k us viuh 'kknh dk bUnzkt lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r cjk/kk] rglhy HkqUrj]

ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½ esa ntZ ugha djok;k gSA

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks o lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh

O;fDr dks mijksDr izkFkhZx.kksa dh 'kknh ls lEcfU/kr iapk;r ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks

rks og fnukad 22&04&2019 dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr

vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk

fu;ekuqlkj 'kknh ntZ djus ds vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 23&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh ,oa rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

233

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh ,oa rglhynkj HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 15&BT/2019

rkjh[k is'kh % 22&04&2019

nk;j frfFk % 06&03&2019

Jh pek: jke iq= Jh ea?k: jke] xkao eyk.kk] Mkd?kj eyk.kk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½A

cuke

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= vf/kfu;e /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

Jh pek: jke iq= Jh ea?k: jke] xkao eyk.kk] Mkd?kj eyk.kk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½ us bl dk;kZy; esa izkFkZuk&i= e; 'kiFk&i= fn;k x;k gS fd mldhs iq=h 'khfj;kU'kk dk tUe

fnukad 28&04&2016 dks LFkku xkao eyk.kk] Mkd?kj eyk.kk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0 esa gqvk

gS ijUrq mlds tUe dh frfFk dk bUnzkt fdlh dkj.ko'k xzke iapk;r eyk.kk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0 ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u fd;k gSA

vr% bl b'rgkj gtk }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks dqekjh

'khfj;kU'kk iq=h Jh pek: jke ds tUe frfFk ntZ djokus ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks og fnukad 22&04&2019

dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok

ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj tUe frfFk ntZ djokus ds

vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r dks ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 23&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh ,oa rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh ,oa rglhynkj HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 19-MT/19

rkjh[k is'kh % 22&04&2019

nk;j frfFk % 01&02&2019

1- fujr jke iq= Jh yky pUn] fuoklh xkao 'khj'kq] Mkd?kj /kkjk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½A

2- Jherh 'kkjnk nsoh iq=h Jh nkSyr jke] fuoklh dks'k ukyk] Mkd?kj U;qyhs] rglhy HkqUrj]

ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

cuke

234

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 5¼4½ fg0 iz0 jftLVªhdj.k fu;e] 2004 fookg iathdj.k ckjsA

mijksDr ekeyk esa izkFkhZx.k mijksDr us fnukad 01&02&2019 dks bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e;

'kiFk is'k fd;s gSa fd mUgksaus fnukad 26&04&2012 dks 'kknh dj yh gS vkSj rc ls nksuksa irh&iRuh ds

:i esa jgrs pys vk jgs gSaA ijUrq izkFkhZx.k us viuh 'kknh dk bUnzkt lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r jrkspk]

rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½ esa ntZ ugha djok;k gSA

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks o lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd fdlh O;fDr

dks mijksDr izkFkhZx.kksa dh 'kknh ls lEcfU/kr iapk;r ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og

fnukad 22&04&2019 dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj

viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj 'kknh

ntZ djus ds vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r dks ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 23&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh izFke Js.kh ,oa rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj HkqUrj]

ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 13&BNT@2019

nk;j frfFk % 13&06&2018

Jh Bkdqj nkl iq= Jh /;kuq jke] xkao 'kkfgVk] Mkd?kj dlyknh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0A

cuke

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= vf/kfu;e /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

Jh Bkdqj nkl iq= Jh /;kuq jke] xkao 'kkfgVk] Mkd?kj dlyknh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0 us bl dk;kZy; esa izkFkZuk&i= e; 'kiFk&i= fn;k gS fd mldh iq=h Hkqous'ojh dk tUe fnukad

16&11&2015 dks LFkku xkao 'kkfgVk] Mkd?kj dlyknh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0 esa gqvk gS

ijUrq mlds tUe dh frfFk dk bUnzkt fdlh dkj.ko'k xzke iapk;r ih.kh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0 ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u fd;k gSA

vr% bl b'rgkj gtk }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks dqekjh

Hkqous'ojh iq=h Jh Bkdqj nkl dh tUe frfFk ntZ djokus ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks og fnukad 25&04&2019

dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok

235

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj tUe frfFk ntZ djokus ds

vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r dks ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 27&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj HkqUrj]

ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 14&BNT@2019

nk;j frfFk % 13&06&2018

Jh Bkdqj nkl iq= Jh /;kuq jke] xkao 'kkfgVk] Mkd?kj dlyknh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0A

cuke

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= vf/kfu;e /kkjk 13¼3½ tUe ,oa e`R;q iathdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1969-

Jh Bkdqj nkl iq= Jh /;kuq jke] xkao 'kkfgVk] Mkd?kj dlyknh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0

iz0 us bl dk;kZy; esa izkFkZuk&i= e; 'kiFk&i= fn;k gS fd mldh iq=h luk{kh dk tUe fnukad

16&06&2017 dks LFkku xkao 'kkfgVk] Mkd?kj dlyknh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0 esa gqvk gS

ijUrq mlds tUe dh frfFk dk bUnzkt fdlh dkj.ko'k xzke iapk;r ih.kh] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw]

fg0 iz0 ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ u fd;k gSA

vr% bl b'rgkj gtk }kjk loZlk/kkj.k dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks dqekjh

luk{kh iq=h Jh Bkdqj nkl dh tUe frfFk ntZ djokus ckjs dksbZ vkifÙk gks rks og fnukad 25&04&2019

dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok

ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj tUe frfFk ntZ djokus ds

vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r dks ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 27&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw] fg0 iz0A

236

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 13-MNT/19

nk;j frfFk % 16&10&2017

1- Vsd jke iq= Jh f[k;ky nkl] fuoklh xkao vk'kuh] Mkd?kj f'k;kg] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk

dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½A

2- Jherh lqek iq=h Jh rqys jke] xkao /kkjk] Mkd?kj xM+lk] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½A

cuke

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 5¼4½ fg0 iz0 jftLVªhdj.k fu;e] 2004 fookg iathdj.k ckjsA

mijksDr ekeyk esa izkFkhZx.k mijksDr us fnukad 16&10&2017 dks bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e;

'kiFk is'k fd;s gSa fd mUgksaus fnukad 01&01&2005 dks 'kknh dj yh gS vkSj rc ls nksuksa irh&iRuh ds

:i esa jgrs pys vk jgs gSaA ijUrq izkFkhZx.k us viuh 'kknh dk bUnzkt lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r Hkyk.k&I]

rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½ esa ntZ ugha djok;k gSA

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks o lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd fdlh O;fDr

dks mijksDr izkFkhZx.kksa dh 'kknh ls lEcfU/kr iapk;r ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og

fnukad 25&04&2019 dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj

viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj 'kknh

ntZ djus ds vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r dks ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 27&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½

dsl ua0 % 11-MNT/19

nk;j frfFk % 25&3&2019

1- /keZ pUn iq= Jh izhre] fuoklh xkao ukSM+xzka] Mkd?kj ekSgy] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½A

2- Jherh fu'kq iq=h Jh Hkknj flag] xkao VSgulsjh] Mkd?kj ekSgy] rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw

¼fg0 iz0½A

cuke

loZlk/kkj.k ,oa vke turk

237

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

fo"k;-&& izkFkZuk&i= tsj /kkjk 5¼4½ fg0 iz0 jftLVªhdj.k fu;e] 2004 fookg iathdj.k ckjsA

mijksDr ekeyk esa izkFkhZx.k mijksDr us fnukad 25&03&2019 dks bl vnkyr esa izkFkZuk&i= e;

'kiFk is'k fd;s gaS fd mUgksaus fnukad 20&02&2018 dks 'kknh dj yh gS vkSj rc ls nksuksa irh&iRuh ds

:i esa jgrs pys vk jgs gSaA ijUrq izkFkhZx.k us viuh 'kknh dk bUnzkt lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r f'kyhjktfxjh]

rglhy HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½ esa ntZ ugha djok;k gSA

vr% loZlk/kkj.k dks o lxs lEcfU/k;ksa dks bl b'rgkj }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd fdlh O;fDr

dks mijksDr izkFkhZx.kksa dh 'kknh ls lEcfU/kr iapk;r ds vfHkys[k esa ntZ djus ckjs dksbZ ,rjkt gks rks og

fnukad 25&04&2019 dks lqcg 10-00 cts ;k blls iwoZ vlkyru ;k odkyru gkftj vnkyr vkdj

viuk ,rjkt ntZ djok ldrk gSA blds mijkUr dksbZ Hkh ,rjkt lek;r u gksxk rFkk fu;ekuqlkj 'kknh

ntZ djus ds vkns'k lEcfU/kr xzke iapk;r dks ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

vkt fnukad 27&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr }kjk tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

gLrk{kfjr@&

dk;Zdkjh n.Mkf/kdkjh f}rh; Js.kh ,oa uk;c rglhynkj]

HkqUrj] ftyk dqYyw ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,

District Mandi, H. P.

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Bhoop Singh s/o Sh. Hem Singh, Village Nalhog, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli, District

Mandi, H.P.

2. Smt. Annu Chauhan d/o Sh. Dhoom Bahadur Singh Chauhan, r/o In front of P.W.D.

Bhona Islam Nagar, Bazpur Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand-262401 (At presen wife

of Sh. Bhoop Singh s/o Sh. Hem Singh, Village Nalhog, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli, District Mandi,

H.P.

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.—Application for the registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act,

1954.

Sh. Bhoop Singh s/o Sh. Hem Singh, Village Nalhog, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli, District

Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Annu Chauhan d/o Sh. Dhoom Bahadur Singh Chauhan, r/o In front of

P.W.D. Bhona Islam Nagar, Bazpur Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand-262401 (At

presen wife of Sh. Bhoop Singh s/o Sh. Hem Singh, Village Nalhog, P.O. Baryara, Tehsil Kotli,

District Mandi, H.P. have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned

under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on

23-02-2019 according to Hindu rites and customs at their respective houses District Mandi, H.P.

and they are living together as husband and wife since then. Hence, their marriage may be

registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

238

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who

has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this

court on or before 17-04-2019 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be

registered.

Issued today on 18th day of March, 2019 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sadar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_________

c vnkyr Jh izdk'k pUn 'kekZ] lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] i/kj] rglhy i/kj]

ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

muoku eqdíek % 37¼2½

rkjh[k is'kh % 23&04&2019

jkts'k iq= Jh yky flag] fuoklh n:.k] Mkd?kj jksik] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh] fg0 iz0 ^{- -}izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

- - izR;kFkhZA

vkosnu i=-&&tsj /kkjk 37¼2½ ds vUrxZr uke n#Lr djus ckjkA

vkosnd jkts'k iq= Jh yky flag] fuoklh n:.k] Mkd?kj jksik] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh] fg0 iz0

us bl vnkyr esa vkosnu&i= xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke xzke iapk;r jksik ds fjdkMZ o mlds 'kS{kf.kd

dkxtkr esa jkts'k ntZ gS o mlds firk dk uke yky flag ntZ gSA tcfd mldk uke egky n:.k@499

ds Hkw0&jktLo vfHkys[k esa jkts'k dqekj o blds firk dk uke yky pUn xyr ntZ gqvk gS rFkk vkosnd

us bl vnkyr ls izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldk uke jkts'k dqekj ds LFkku ij jkts'k mQZ jkts'k dqekj o

mlds firk dk uke yky pUn ds LFkku ij yky flag mQZ yky pUn ntZ djus ds fyf[kr vkns'k fn;s

tkosaA

vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mDr uke

ntZ djus ckjk dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru rkjh[k is'kh 23&04&2019 dks lqcg

10-00 cts gkftj gksdj viuk mtj is'k dj ldrk gS clwjr xSj&gkftjh ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa

ykbZ tkdj mfpr vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

;g b'rgkj vkt fnukad 11&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

izdk'k pUn 'kekZ]

lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]

i/kj] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

239

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

c vnkyr Jh izdk'k pUn 'kekZ] lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] i/kj] rglhy i/kj]

ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

muoku eqdíek % 37¼2½

rkjh[k is'kh % 23&04&2019

nyhi pUn iq= Jh fnoku pUn] fuoklh n:.k] Mkd?kj jksik] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

^{- -}izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

- - izR;kFkhZA

vkosnu i=-&&tsj /kkjk 37¼2½ ds vUrxZr uke n#Lr djus ckjkA

vkosnd nyhi pUn iq= Jh fnoku pUn] fuoklh n:.k] Mkd?kj jksik] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh

¼fg0 iz0½ us bl vnkyr esa vkosnu&i= xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke xzke iapk;r fjdkMZ o vU; dkxtkr esa

nyhi pUn ntZ gS tcfd egky n:.k@499 ds reke Hkw0&jktLo vfHkys[kksa esa mldk uke nyhi dqekj

ntZ gS tks xyr ntZ gqvk gS rFkk vkosnd us bl vnkyr ls izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldk uke nyhi dqekj

ds LFkku ij nyhi pUn ntZ djus ds fyf[kr vkns'k fn;s tkosaA

vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mDr uke

ntZ djus ckjk dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru rkjh[k is'kh 23&04&2019 dks lqcg

10-00 cts gkftj gksdj viuk mtj is'k dj ldrk gS clwjr xSj&gkftjh ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa

ykbZ tkdj mfpr vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

;g b'rgkj vkt fnukad 11&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

izdk'k pUn 'kekZ]

lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]

i/kj] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

&&&&&&&&&

c vnkyr Jh izdk'k pUn 'kekZ] lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh] i/kj] rglhy i/kj]

ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

muoku eqdíek % 37¼2½

rkjh[k is'kh % 23&04&2019

ukxs'oj iq= Jh psr jke] fuoklh o Mkd?kj xokyh] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½ ^{- -}izkFkhZA

cuke

vke turk

- - izR;kFkhZA

vkosnu i=-&&tsj /kkjk 37¼2½ ds vUrxZr uke n#Lr djus ckjkA

vkosnd ukxs'oj iq= Jh psr jke] fuoklh o Mkd?kj xokyh] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½

us bl vnkyr esa vkosnu&i= xqtkjk gS fd mldk uke xzke iapk;r fjdkMZ o vU; dkxtkr esa ukxs'oj

240

jkti=] fgekpy izns'k] 08 vizSy] 2019@18 pS=] 1941

ntZ gS tcfd egky xokyh@542 ds reke Hkw0&jktLo vfHkys[kksa esa mldk uke ukx nso ntZ gS tks xyr

ntZ gqvk gS rFkk vkosnd us bl vnkyr ls izkFkZuk dh gS fd mldk uke ukx nso ds LFkku ij ukxs'oj

mQZ ukx nso ntZ djus ds fyf[kr vkns'k fn;s tkosaA

vr% bl b'rgkj }kjk vke turk dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn fdlh O;fDr dks mDr uke

ntZ djus ckjk dksbZ mtj@,rjkt gks rks og vlkyru ;k odkyru rkjh[k is'kh 23&04&2019 dks lqcg

10-00 cts gkftj gksdj viuk mtj is'k dj ldrk gS clwjr xSj&gkftjh ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa

ykbZ tkdj mfpr vkns'k ikfjr dj fn, tk,axsA

;g b'rgkj vkt fnukad 11&03&2019 dks esjs gLrk{kj o eksgj vnkyr ls tkjh gqvkA

eksgjA

izdk'k pUn 'kekZ]

lgk;d lekgrkZ izFke Js.kh]

i/kj] rglhy i/kj] ftyk e.Mh ¼fg0 iz0½A

fu;U=d] eqnz.k rFkk ys[ku lkexzh] fgekpy izns'k] f'keyk&5 }kjk eqfnzr rFkk izdkf'kr

bysDVªkWfud gLrk{kfjr jkti=] oSclkbV http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in ij miyC/k gS ,oe~ vkWuykbu lR;kfir fd;k tk ldrk gS