झारखड गजट
असाधारण अंक
झारखड सरकार वारा काशत
4 भा, 1942 (श०)
सं! या– 387 राँची, बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020 (ई०)
गृह, कारा एवं आपदा बंधन वभाग ।
-------------
अ1धसूचना
20 अग-त, 2020 ई०।
संया :-11/बंद ववध-07/2019- 2987-- झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-
17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF Iबरसा मुडा
केJ7य कारा, होटवार, राँची मF संसीमत आजीवन कारावास क< सजा ाKत LनMनांNकत बं=दयO के
-ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा अ-वीकृत करते हुए कारा से मुRत नह7ं करने
का Lनण:य लया गया है :-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
1
तारासरदार,
पे०- गोTवJद सरदार,
उV-59 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
crime committed by convict is murder of a four year old child which
is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the
facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
2
पाIXकबाड़ा,
पे॰-[ांसस जेTवयर बाड़ा,
उV-56 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
Further the convicing court has specifically opined that convict has
murdered an innocent girl aged about 2 years which is most
heinous crime. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and
reports placed upon, including age of the convict, decided to reject
the premature release of the convict.
2
झारखड गजट(असाधारण) बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020
3
सुनीलएRका,
पे॰- पलसी=दयुस एRका,
उV-50 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed murder and the body was hidden with a view to
destroy evidence evidence which is very heinous in nature. Hence
the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
4
Tवनोदमहल7,
पे॰- -व॰ नटवर महल7,
उV-45 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing innocent child. Further
the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that “The
crime has been committed in a very gruesome manner. Thus it is a
crime against society.” Hence the Board after considering all the
facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
5
चामूउराँव,
पे॰- -व॰ लालदेव उराँव,
उV-45 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed triple murder including two girls of age 3 years
and 5 years which is very heinous in nature. The Board also
considered the present age of the convict. Hence the Board after
considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject
the premature release of the convict.
6
मुमताजअंसार7,
पे०- तेगा उफ: तेजा अंसार7,
उV-44 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed murder in a premediated and brutal manner
which is very heinous in nature. The board also considered the
present age of the convict. Hence the Board after considering all the
facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
7
भुजूमुमू:,
पे०- -व० लालू मुमू:,
उV-44 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict was convicted under witchcraft Act for murder which is
crime against society and very heinous in nature. Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
8
बुधरामउराँव,
पे॰- -व॰ मनुवा उराँव,
उV-43 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed murder which is very heinous in nature. The
board also considered the present age of the convict. Hence the
Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
9
]ानकाशलकड़ा,
पे॰- फुलजेMस लकड़ा,
उV-41 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict was convicted for murder and destroying evidence which
very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the
facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
10
तोMबोकुंकल,
पे॰- िजक< कुंकल,
उV-40 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict raped and murdered a girl which is most heinous crime.
Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed
upon, including age of the convict, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
11
लेबोरसंहकुंकल,
पे॰- =दयू कुंकल,
उV-39 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict raped and murdered a girl which is most heinous crime.
Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed
upon, including age of the convict, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
झारखड गजट(असाधारण) बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020
3
12
दुस_ कुंकलउफ: जुड़ू,
पे॰- -व॰ बामया कुंकल,
उV-36 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict murdered 20 years old girl by rifle. There is a possibility of
crime repetation. Hence the Board after considering all the facts
and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of
the convict.
13
पेटाउफ: फेटाकुदादा,
पे0- बोयो कुदादा,
उV-32 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report
that “The convict raped a small baby girl aged about two and half
years, it is serious and heinous.” Hence the Board after considering
all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the
premature release of the convict.
14
जीतेनमराडी,
पे॰- पाल7 मराडी,
उV-58 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous killing of a lady (crime against women).
Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report
that “from perusal of heinousness of offence convict should not be
fit for premature release.” Hence the Board after considering all the
facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
15
आसमानमहतो,
पे॰- -व॰ घासीराम महतो,
उV-55 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons
(multiple murder). Further the convicting court has specifically
submitted the report that “He does not deserve any lenient view.”
Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed
upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
16
मासूकोकामहतो,
पे॰- -व॰ शव नाथ महतो,
उV-50 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons
(multiple murder). Further the convicting court has specifically
submitted the report that “He does not deserve any lenient view.”
Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed
upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
17
भोJदोमहतो,
पे॰ -व॰ फगुआ महतो,
उV-50 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent
persons. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the
report that “He does not deserve any lenient view.” Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
18
घुरनमुडा,
पे॰- नJद राम मुडा,
उV- 42 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent
persons. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the
report that “He does not deserve any lenient view.” Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
19
सुरेशमहतो,
पे॰- डोमन महतो,
उV-38 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent
persons. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the
report that “He does not deserve any lenient view.” Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
4
झारखड गजट(असाधारण) बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020
20
सुलेमानबारला,
पे॰- bरटू पौलुस बारला,
उV-50 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing own younger brother.
S.P and P.O has reported that after release from prison may indulge
in criminal activities. Hence the Board after considering all the facts
and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of
the convict.
21
नारायणमहतो,
पे॰- काल7चरण महतो,
उV-46 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping and killing a
Doctor for ransom which is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
22
IबशेPवरमहतो,
पे॰- -व॰ लूटन महतो,
उV-48 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping and killing a
Doctor for ransom which is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
2.
झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत
बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF केJ7य कारा, मे=दनीनगर, पलामू मF संसीमत आजीवन कारावास क<
सजा ाKत LनMनांNकत बं=दयO के -ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा अ-वीकृत करते हुए
कारा से मुRत नह7ं करने का Lनण:य लया गया है:-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
23
गोरखसाव,
पे॰- चतुर7 साव,
उV- 69 वष: लगभग (वृ+)
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of killing three innocent
people (i.e. multiple murder). Further the convicting court has
specifically submitted the report that “The convict has
committed very heinous offence of murder of 03 persons
including 02 females in one go, the guilt of the convict do not
deserves to be considered for his premature release” Hence the
Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
24
dवणTवPवकमा:
पे0- देवराज TवPवकमा:,
उV- 66 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of killing two innocent
persons in a gruesome manner which was premediated. Hence
the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
25
द7पTवPवकमा:,
पे॰- मथुरा TवPवकमा:,
उV- 53 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of killing two innocent
persons in a gruesome manner which was premediated. Hence
the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
26
मनोगागंझू,
पे0- मोहन गंझू,
उV- 47 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed offence against state as he murdered the
ASI of Panki Police Station in a very gruesome manner being
engaged in Naxal activities. Hence the Board after considering all
the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the
premature release of the convict.
झारखड गजट(असाधारण) बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020
5
27
मुकेशकुमारसाहू,
पे0- उमाचरण साहू,
उV- 45 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping of
innocent child of Ten years for ransom. The Board has also
considered the age of convict. Hence the Board after considering
all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the
premature release of the convict.
28
TपJटूकुमारउफ: गुंजन,
पे0- रामानJद यादव,
उV- 36 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of loot and killing
innocent person. Hence the Board after considering all the facts
and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release
of the convict.
29
सुखलालसंह,
पे॰- दरबार7 संह,
उV- 45 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of dacoity and naxal
activities i.e. crime against society. Hence the Board after
considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
30
TवPवनाथसंहउफ: बी॰एन॰संह,
उV- 58 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court.
The convict committed heinous offence of killing two innocent
persons in gruesome manner. Hence the Board after considering
all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the
premature release of the convict.
3.
झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत
बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF लोकनायक जयकाश नारायण केJ7य कारा, हजार7बाग मF संसीमत
आजीवन कारावास क< सजा ाKत LनMनांNकत बं=दयO के -ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा
अ-वीकृत करते हुए कारा से मुRत नह7ं करने का Lनण:य लया गया है :-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
31
पKपुसंह,
पे॰- रामाधार संह,
उV- 42 वष:।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of ransome. Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
32
मनेशमहतो,
पे.- पारसनाथ महतो,
उV- 41 वष:।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing of his innocent wife and
destroying evidence. Thus it is a crime against society.” Hence the
Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
33
अनीलकुमार,
पे॰- पुनीत महतो,
उV- 40 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing 14 years old innocent
child. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the
report that “In my opinion 1. The victim was a boy of 10 yr. of age, 2.
During the kidnapping he was going to school, 3. His murder was
heartbreaking moment for his parents and the whole community
and 4. Releasing this type of convict will share a message of injustice
to the law abiding society” Hence the Board after considering all the
facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature
release of the convict.
6
झारखड गजट(असाधारण) बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020
34
राजेशचौधर7,
पे.- =दवान चौधर7,
उV- 40 वष: लगभग।
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping and killing
teenager on the allegation of having illicit relations with wife of
convict. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the
report that “Rajesh Choudhary has committed the offence willingly
with cruel intention, This is one of the heinous crime. Hence the
Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon,
decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
35
मुकेश
कुमार
मेहता
उफ:
महतो,
प॰.-
=दनेPवर
मेहता
उफ:
महतो,
उV-39 वष:,
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of rape, murder and destroying
evidence. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and
reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the
convict.
4.
झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत
बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF केJ7य कारा, दुमका मF संसीमत आजीवन कारावास क< सजा ाKत
LनMनांNकत बंद7 के -ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा अ-वीकृत करते हुए कारा से मुRत
नह7ं करने का Lनण:य लया गया है :-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
36
बोबलुउफ: बबलुयादव,
पे0-रामनाथ यादव,
उV-42 वष:
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of murder in a premediated
manner by calling him from house and shot by pistol, which is very
heinous crime. Further S.P. has reported that if released will engage
in criminal activities. The Board has also considered the age of
convict. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports
placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
5.
झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत
बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF केJ7य कारा, घाघीडीह, जमशेदपुर मF संसीमत आजीवन कारावास क<
सजा ाKत LनMनांNकत बं=दयO के -ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा अ-वीकृत करते हुए
कारा से मुRत नह7ं करने का Lनण:य लया गया है :-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
37
कुनालजेनाउफ: कुJना,
पे॰--व॰ कeलु चरण जेना,
उV-54 वष: लगभग
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing President of Tisco
Union in a premediated manner the enquiry & supervision was done
by CBI. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the
report that “convict Kunal Jenna was a contractor and he does not
deserve any sympathetic view.” Hence the Board after considering
all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the
premature release of the convict.
झारखड गजट(असाधारण) बुधवार, 26 अग-त, 2020
7
38
नरेJ संहउफ: पंfडत
पे0--व0 मदन मोहन संह
उ.-65 वष2, (वृ+)
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing innocent public
representative and advocate for political reasons in a premediated
manner with other co-accused. The case was enquired &
supervisioned by CBI. Further the convict was punished twice for
prison offence. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and
reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the
convict.
6.
झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत
बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF मंडल कारा, चास मF संसीमत आजीवन कारावास क< सजा ाKत
LनMनांNकत बंद7 के -ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा अ-वीकृत करते हुए कारा से मुRत
नह7ं करने का Lनण:य लया गया है :-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
39
Lतजनाखfड़या,
पे॰--व॰ मंगरा खfड़या,
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict committed heinous offence of killing three persons
(multiple murder), which is heinous in nature. Thus it is a crime
against society.” Hence the Board after considering all the facts and
reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the
convict.
7.
झारखड रा5य सजा पुनर78ण पष:द क< =दनांक-17.07.2020 एवं 20.07.2020 को आहूत
बैठक मF क< गई अनुशंसा के आलोक मF मंडल कारा, गढ़वा मF संसीमत आजीवन कारावास क< सजा ाKत
LनMनांNकत बंद7 के -ताव को आवPयक समी8ोपरांत रा5य सरकार वारा अ-वीकृत करते हुए कारा से मुRत
नह7ं करने का Lनण:य लया गया है :-
"॰
बंद काववरण
अ&वीकृ(तकाकारण
1
2
3
40
कृhणाबड़ाईक,
पे॰--व॰ महेJ बड़ाईक,
उV-51 वष:,
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent,
S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The
convict murdered the victim with pistol in premediated manner by
forcibly entering the house which is very heinous. Hence the Board
after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to
reject the premature release of the convict.
झारखड रा5यपाल के आदेश से,
सतीश कुमार,
सरकार के अवर स1चव।
-----------
झारख
झारखड राजक<य मुणालय
ड राजक<य मुणालय, राँची वारा काशत एवं मु=त
राँची वारा काशत एवं मु=त,
झारखड गजट
झारखड गजट (असाधारण
असाधारण)
) 387 -- 50
50