(1)

ϝೇಷ ªಾಜÍ ಪĦΐೆ

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

No.LAW-LAC/126/2025

The Karnataka Government Secretariat

Vidhana Soudha,

Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Veedhi,

Bengaluru, dated:17.12.2025

NOTIFICATION

The draft of the following rules further to amend the Karnataka Judicial

Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004, which the Government of Karnataka proposes

to make in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 read with

section 8 of the Karnataka State Civil Service Act, 1978 (Karnataka Act 14 of 1990)

is hereby published as required by clause (a) of sub-rule (2) of section 3 of the said

Act for the information of all the persons likely to be affected thereby and notice is

hereby given that the said draft will be taken into consideration after fifteen days

from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

Any objection or suggestion, which may be received by the State Government

from any person with respect to the said draft, before the expiry of the period

specified above will be considered by the State Government. Objections and

suggestions may be addressed to the Principal Secretary to Government, Law,

Justice and Human Rights Department, Vidhana Soudha, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

Veedhi, Bengaluru-560 001.

DRAFT RULES

1. Title and commencement.-(1) These rules may be called the Karnataka

Judicial Service (Recruitment)(Amendment) Rules, 2025.

¨sÁUÀ – 4J

Part – IVA

17

, 2025 (

, 26,

, ೧೯೪7)

BENGALURU, WEDNESDAY 17, DECEMBER, 2025 (MARGASHIRA, 26, SHAKAVARSHA, 1947)

. 813

No. 813

2

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their final publication in the

Official Gazette.

2. Substitution of rule 2.- In the Karnataka Judicial Service (Recruitment)

Rules, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), for rule 2, the following shall

be substituted, namely:-

“2. Definitions.-

In these rules, unless the context requires otherwise-

(a) “Country” means India;

(b) “Government” means the Government of Karnataka;

(c) “Governor” means the Governor of Karnataka;

(d) “High Court” means the High Court of Karnataka;

(e) “High Courts” means any of the High Courts in India;

(f) “LDCE” means Limited Departmental Competitive Examination;

(g) “Officer” means an Officer of the Karnataka Judicial Service;

(h) “Official Gazette” means the Karnataka Gazette;

(i) “Recruiting Authority” means the High Court of Karnataka;

(j) “Service” means the Karnataka Judicial Service; and

(k) “State” means the State of Karnataka.”

3. Amendment of rule 4.- In rule 4 of the said rules, for the table and entries

relating thereto the following table shall be substituted, namely:-

“

Sl.

No.

Cadre

Method of

Recruitment

Qualifications, age

limit, etc.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1.

District Judge

(1) By Promotion:

Fifty percent of the

total posts in the

cadre shall be filled

by promotion from

the cadre of Senior

Civil Judge, on the

basis

of

seniority-

cum-merit

and

passing a suitability

test to be conducted

by the High Court.

Must have put in service

for a period of not less

than five years in the

cadre of Senior Civil

Judge.

3

(2)

By

Promotion

through LDCE:

Twenty-five

percent

of the total posts in

the cadre shall be

filled by promotion

from the cadre of

Senior Civil Judge,

strictly on the basis

of merit through the

LDCE.

Note-1: If any of the

posts remain vacant

under this category,

the same shall be

filled through regular

promotion

under

item

(1)

in

that

particular year.

Note-2: Filling up of

the vacant posts in

the ratio considered

for LDCE shall be

carried out from the

simultaneous

selection

process

carried

out

for

regular promotion of

the same year.

(i) Must have put in

service for a period of

not less than three years

in the cadre of Senior

Civil Judge; and

(ii) Must have completed

minimum seven years of

total service in the cadre

of

Civil

Judge

and

Senior Civil Judge; and

(iii) Must have attained

the age of 35 years.

(3)

By

Direct

Recruitment:

Twenty-five

percent

of the total posts in

the cadre shall be

filled

by

direct

recruitment on the

basis of the aggregate

marks obtained in a

competitive

examination (written

and

Viva-voce)

conducted

by

the

High Court.

(i) Must be holder of a

degree in law granted

by

auniversity

established by law in

India.

(ii) As on the last date

fixed for receipt of

applications –

(a) must be practicing as

an

advocate

in

the

Supreme Court of India

or

High

Courts

or

District and Trial Courts

in

the

Country

and

must have so practiced

4

continuously

for

a

period of not less than

seven years; or must be

working as a Public

Prosecutor/Assistant

Public

Prosecutor/Government

Counsel in full time

employment

of

the

Central Government or

State

Governmentsof

the Country and must

have so worked for a

period of not less than

seven years.

(b) must have attained

the age of 35 years; and

must not have attained

the age of 48 years in

the case of candidates

belonging to Scheduled

Castes

or

Scheduled

Tribes and 45 years in

the case of others.

Note: The maximum

age limit is relaxed by

three years in the case

of

Ex-servicemen

candidates.

2. Senior

Civil

Judge

(1) By Promotion:

Ninety percent of the

total posts in the

cadre shall be filled

by promotion from

the cadre of Civil

Judge, on the basis of

seniority-cum-merit

and

passing

a

suitability test to be

conducted

by

the

High Court.

Must

have

put

in

servicefor a period of not

less than five years in

the cadre of Civil Judge.

(2)

By

Promotion

through LDCE:

Ten percent of the

total posts in the

Must have put in service

for a period of not less

than three years in the

cadre of Civil Judge,

5

cadre shall be filled

by promotion from

the cadre of Civil

Judge, strictly on the

basis

of

merit

through the LDCE.

Note-1:If any of the

posts remain vacant

under this category,

the same shall be

filled through regular

promotion

under

item

(1)

in

that

particular year.

Note-2: Filling up of

the vacant posts in

the ratio considered

for LDCE shall be

carried out from the

simultaneous

selection

process

carried

out

for

regular promotion of

the same year.

excluding the period of

one

year

training

undergone.

3.

Civil Judge

By direct recruitment

on

the

basis

of

aggregate

marks

obtained

in

a

competitive

examination (written

and

Viva-voce)

conducted by High

Court.

(i) Must be holder of a

degree in law granted

by

a

university

established by law in

India.

(ii) As on the last date

fixed for receipt of

application,-

(a) must be practicing as

an

advocate

in

the

Supreme Court of India

or

High

Courts

or

District and Trial Courts

in

the

Country

and

must have so practiced

continuously

for

a

period of not less than

three years; or must be

working as a Public

Prosecutor/Assistant

Public

6

Prosecutor/Government

Counsel in full time

employment

of

the

Central Government or

State Governments of

the Country and must

have so worked for a

period of not less than

three years.

(b)

must

not

have

completed 40 years of

age

in

the

case

of

candidates belonging to

any of the Scheduled

Castes

or

Scheduled

Tribes or Category-I of

the Backward Classes;

38 years of age in the

case

of

candidates

belonging to any of the

Category-II(a) or II(b) or

Ill(a) or III(b) of Other

Backward Classes; and

35 years of age in the

case

of

any

other

candidates.

Note:The maximum age

limit is relaxed by 3

years in the case of Ex-

servicemen candidates.

4. Insertion of new rules 4-A, 4-B, 4-C and 4-D.- In the said rules, after rule

4 the following rules shall be inserted, namely:-

“4-A. Procedure for promotion to the cadre of District Judge on the basis

of seniority-cum- merit (50% category).-

(1) Zone of consideration shall be1:2 of the available/anticipated vacancies.

(2) The criteria to assess the merit and suitability of the Officer for promotion

shall be as hereunder, consisting of maximum 125 marks:

(a) Assessment of judgments rendered by the Officer during the period of

five years preceding the month during which promotion of the Officer

is being considered - 70 marks;

7

(b) Consideration of Annual Confidential Records of the Officer for a

period of five years preceding the year during which promotion of the

Officer is being considered - 15 marks;

(c) Consideration of percentage of disposal of cases by the Officer, against

the

quota

fixed,

for

a

period

of

five

years

preceding

the year during which promotion of the Officer is being considered-15

marks;

(d) Viva-voce – 25 marks.

The Officer shall be tested on the following aspects, namely:-

(i) Updated knowledge of Law;

(ii) General perceptions and awareness; and

(iii) Communication skills.

(3) Where the concerned Officer has been working or worked on a post in

which he does not have to write judgments, such as a deputation post in the High

Court or any other Authority or Forum or Government etc., the judgments rendered

and percentage of disposal of cases, prior to such postings shall be considered.

(4) An Officer shall secure minimum 50% of the aggregate marks prescribed

under clause 2(a) to 2(c) above to be eligible for Viva-voce and shall secure

minimum 25% of the marks prescribed for Viva-voce, to be successful in Viva-voce.

(5) The Officers who have secured minimum 50% of the aggregate marks

prescribed under clause 2(a) to 2(c) above and minimum 25% of the marks

prescribed for Viva-voce, shall be eligible to be considered for promotion, in the

order of seniority.

(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 4-A, the High Court, upon

consideration of any of the remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Records

and percentage of disposal of cases against the quota fixed during the past five

years; and the nature and gravity of the complaint/s and/or Disciplinary

Inquiry/ies, if any, pending or contemplated, in respect of the Officer who is

successful in the aforesaid assessment and Viva-voce, if arrives at the opinion that

the Officer does not deserve or is not eligible for promotion, the High Court for the

reasons to be recorded in writing, may take suitable decision in this regard.

4-B. Procedure for promotion to the cadre of District Judge, strictly on

the basis of merit through LDCE (25% category).-

(1) The criteria to assess the merit and suitability of the Officer for promotion

shall be as hereunder, consisting of maximum 125 marks:

(a) Written examination shall be of one paper of 3 hours duration carrying

100 marks consisting of following 2 parts, with maximum 50 marks for each of the

parts,-

(i) Constitutional and Civil Laws; and

(ii) Criminal Laws

(b) Viva-voce – 25 marks

The Officer shall be tested on the following aspects, namely:-

8

(i) Updated knowledge of Law;

(ii) General perceptions and awareness; and

(iii) Communication skills.

(2) Minimum marks to be secured for pass in the written examination shall

be 50.

(3) From among the Officers who are successful in the written examination,

as far as may be, such number of Officers as is equal to three times the number of

vacancies notified, selected in the order of merit, shall be called for Viva-voce. An

Officer shall secure minimum 25% of the marks prescribed for Viva-voce, to be

successful in Viva-voce.

(4) A list of Officers who are eligible for promotion shall be prepared consisting

such number of Officers, as far as may be, as is equal to the number of vacancies

notified, in the order of merit, on the basis of the aggregate of marks secured in the

written examination and the Viva-voce.

(5) The maximum number of attempts to appear in LDCE shall be 3 (three).

(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 4-B, the High Court, upon

consideration of any of the remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Records

and percentage of disposal of cases against the quota fixed during the past three

years; and the nature and gravity of the complaint/s and/or Disciplinary

Inquiry/ies, if any, pending or contemplated, in respect of the Officer who is

successful in the written examination and Viva-voce, if arrives at the opinion that

the Officer does not deserve or is not eligible for promotion, the High Court for the

reasons to be recorded in writing, may take suitable decision in this regard.

4-C. Procedure for promotion to the cadre of Senior Civil Judge on the

basis of seniority-cum-merit (90% category).-

(1) Zone of consideration shall be 1:2 of the available/anticipated vacancies.

(2) The criteria to assess the merit and suitability of the Officer for promotion

shall be as hereunder, consisting of maximum 125 marks:

(a) Assessment of judgments rendered by the Officer during the period of five

years preceding the month during which promotion of the Officer is being

considered - 90 marks;

(b) Consideration of Annual Confidential Records of the Officer for a period of

five years preceding the year during which promotion of the Officer is being

considered - 20 marks;

(c) Consideration of percentage of disposal of cases by the Officer, against the

quota fixed, for a period of five years preceding the year during which

promotion of the Officer is being considered -15 marks.

(3) Where the concerned Officer has been working or worked on a post in which

he does not have to write judgments, such as a deputation post in the High Court

or any other Authority or Forum or Government etc., the judgments rendered and

percentage of disposal of cases, prior to such postings shall be considered.

9

(4) The Officers who have secured minimum 50% of the aggregate marks

prescribed under clause 2(a) to 2(c) above shall be eligible to be considered for

promotion, in the order of seniority.

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 4-C, the High Court, upon

consideration of any of the remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Records

and percentage of disposal of cases against the quota fixed during the past five

years; and the nature and gravity of the complaint/s and/or Disciplinary

Inquiry/ies, if any, pending or contemplated, in respect of the Officer who is

successful in the aforesaid assessment, if arrives at the opinion that the Officer

does not deserve or is not eligible for promotion, the High Court for the reasons to

be recorded in writing, may take suitable decision in this regard.

4-D.Procedure for promotion to the cadre of Senior Civil Judge by

promotion, strictly on the basis of merit through LDCE (10% category).-

(1) The criteria to assess the merit and suitability of the Officer for promotion

shall be as hereunder, consisting of maximum 125 marks:

(a) Written examination shall be of one paper of 3 hours duration carrying

100 marks on the following subjects, namely:-

(i) Constitutional & Civil Laws.

(ii) Criminal Laws.

(iii) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Bharathiya Sakshya

Adhiniyam, 2023.

(iv) Special Laws.

(b) Viva-voce - 25 marks

The Officer shall be tested on the following aspects, namely:-

(i) Updated knowledge of Law;

(ii) General perceptions and awareness; and

(iii) Communication skills.

(2) Minimum marks to be secured for pass in the written examination shall be

50.

(3) From among the Officers who are successful in the written examination, as

far as may be, such number of Officers as is equal to three times the number of

vacancies notified, selected in the order of merit, shall be called for Viva-voce. An

Officer shallsecure minimum 25% of the marks prescribed for Viva-voce, to be

successful in Viva-voce.

(4) A list of Officers who are eligible for promotion shall be prepared consisting

such number of Officers, as far as may be, as is equal to the number of vacancies

notified, in the order of merit, on the basis of the aggregate of marks secured in the

written examination and the Viva-voce.

10

(5) The maximum number of attempts to appear in LDCE shall be 3 (three).

(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 4-D, the High Court, upon

consideration of any of the remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Records

and percentage of disposal of cases against the quota fixed during the past three

years; and the nature and gravity of the complaint/s and/or Disciplinary

Inquiry/ies, if any, pending or contemplated, in respect of the Officer who is

successful in the written examination and Viva-voce, if arrives at the opinion that

the Officer does not deserve or is not eligible for promotion, the High Court for the

reasons to be recorded in writing, may take suitable decision in this regard.”

5. Amendment of rule 5.- In rule 5 of the said rules,-

(i) for sub-rule I, the following heading shall be inserted, namely:-

“Procedure for Direct Recruitment of District Judges”

(ii) in sub-rule I,-

(a) for clause (1), the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“(1) Minimum marks for pass in the Preliminary Examination shall be 50 for

candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or Persons with

Benchmark Disability category and 60 for others.”

(b) for clause (2), the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“(2) The minimum marks for pass in each paper of the written examination

carrying 150 marks, shall be 50 marks in each paper for candidates belonging to

the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or Persons with Benchmark Disability

category and 60 marks for others. However, total marks to be secured for pass in

the written examination shall be 120 marks out of 300 for the candidates belonging

to Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Persons with Benchmark Disability

category and 150 marks out of 300 for others.”

(c) for clause (4), the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“(4) Candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or

Persons with Benchmark Disability category who obtains minimum of 20% marks

and candidates not belonging to a Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or

Persons with Benchmark Disability category, who obtains minimum of 25% marks

in the Viva-voce shall be eligible to be considered for selection to the posts.

A candidate belonging to the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Persons

with Benchmark Disability category has to secure the following minimum marks

in the Preliminary Examination, Main Written Examination and Viva-voce in order

to be considered for selection under General Category, namely:-

11

Preliminary

Examination

60 Marks

Main Written

Examination

60 marks in each paper. However,

total marks to be secured in the

written examination shall be 150

out of 300.

Viva-voce

25% of marks

”

(iii) for sub-rule II, the following heading shall be inserted, namely:-

“Procedure for Direct Recruitment of Civil Judges”

(iv) in sub-rule II,in clause (1), in sub-clause (e),-

(a) for item (i), the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“(i) Minimum marks for pass in the Preliminary Examination shall be 50

for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or Persons

with Benchmark Disability Category and 60 for others.”

(b) for items (ii) and (iii), the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“(ii) Minimum marks for pass in each paper of the Written Examination

shall be 40 for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes

or Persons with Benchmark Disability category and 50 for others.

(iii) Minimum marks for pass in the Viva-voce shall be 20% of marks for

candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or Persons with

Benchmark Disability category and 25% of marks for others:

Provided that, no candidate who has secured less than the minimum

marks specified above:

(i) in any paper of the Written Examination shall be eligible for

Viva-voce.

(ii) in any paper of the Written Examination or in Viva-voce shall

be eligible for appointment as Civil Judge.

A candidate belonging to the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/

Persons with Benchmark Disability category has to secure the following

minimum marks in the Preliminary Examination, Main Written Examination

and Viva-voce in order to be considered for selection under General Category:

12

Preliminary

Examination

60 marks

Main Written

Examination

50 marks in

each paper

Viva-voce

25% of

marks

”

(v)

in sub-rule II, after clause (5), the following shall be inserted, namely:-

“(6) The candidates who are appointed to the post of Civil Judge pursuant to

their selection through direct recruitment must compulsorily undergo training for

a period of not less than 1 year, before presiding the Court.”

6. Insertion of new rule.-In the said rules,after rule 5, the following ruleshall

be inserted, namely:-

“5-A.Practicing Certificate for Direct Recruitment.-

(1) District Judges.-

(i) Must furnish a Certificate stating that the candidate is a practicing advocate

as on the date of issue of such certificate and indicating the length of continuous

practice:

(a) issued by the Presiding Officer of the Court in which the candidate is

actually practicing, if he is practicing before the District and Trial

Courts in the Country;

(b) issued by the Registrar (Judicial)/Additional Registrar General of the

High Courts, if the candidate is practicing before the High Courts;

(c) issued by an Officer of the Supreme Court of India designated for this

purpose, if the candidate is practicing before the Supreme Court of

India.

(ii) While computing the period of practice,-

(a) in case of a candidate who is practicing advocate, the period, if any,

during which he has held the post of Public Prosecutor/Assistant

Public Prosecutor/Government Counsel in full time employment of the

Central Government or State Governments of the Country, immediately

preceding the period of practice as an advocate, shall be considered; and

(b) in case of a candidate who is working as a Public Prosecutor/Assistant

Public Prosecutor/Government Counsel in full time employment of the

Central Government or State Governments of the Country, the period of

practice as an advocate, if any, by him, immediately preceding such

appointment, shall be considered. Such candidate shall furnish the

13

certificate of practice obtained from the Court where he was practicing

immediately preceding his appointment.

(2) Civil Judges.-

(i) Must furnish a Certificate stating that the candidate is a practicing

advocate as on the date of issue ofsuch certificate and indicating the length of

continuous practice:

(a) issued either by the Principal Judicial Officer of the Court in which the

candidate is actually practicing or by an advocate of that Court having

a minimum standing of ten years duly endorsed by the Principal

Judicial Officer of such District or a Principal Judicial Officer at such a

station, if he is practicing before the District and Trial Courts in the

Country;

(b) issued by an advocate who has a minimum standing of ten years, duly

endorsed by an Officer designated by Supreme Court of India/High

Courts for this purpose, if the candidate is practicing before the

Supreme Court of India/High Courts, as the case may be.

(ii) While computing the period of practice,-

(a) in case of a candidate who is practicing advocate, the period, if any,

during which he has held the post of Public Prosecutor/Assistant Public

Prosecutor/Government Counsel in full time employment of the Central

Government or State Governments of the Country, immediately

preceding the period of practice as an advocate, shall be considered;

(b) in case of a candidate who is working as a Public Prosecutor/Assistant

PublicProsecutor/ Government Counsel in full time employment of the

Central Government or State Governments of the Country, the period of

practice as an advocate, if any, by him, immediately preceding such

appointment, shall be considered. Such candidate shall furnish the

certificate of practice obtained from the Court where he was practicing

immediately preceding his appointment;

(c) the date of provisional enrollment/registration of the candidate with the

concerned State Bar Council shall be considered; and

(d) the period, if any, worked by the candidate as Law Clerk/Research

Assistant with any of the Judges or Judicial Officers in the Country,

shall be considered.”

7. Insertion of new rules 11-A and 11-B.- After rule 11 of said rules, the

following new rules shall be inserted, namely:-

14

“11-A. Norms.-

In addition to these rules, the High Court may frame the norms or guidelines

with regard to the different aspects of the suitability test to assess the merit of the

Officer for promotion.

11-B. Interpretation.-

If any question arises relating to the interpretation of these rules, the

decision of the High Court shall be final.”

By order and in the name of

Governor of Karnataka

(Lalitha)

Additional Secretary to Government

(Admin-1),

Law, Justice and Human Rights

Department

ಮುದÎಕರು ²ಾಗೂ ಪΐಾಶಕರು:- ಸಂಕಲ£ಾĩಾĸಗಳ…, ಕ£ಾಟಕ ªಾಜÍಪತÎ, ಸಾĸ ೇಂದÎ ಮುದΞಾಲಯ, ¦ೆಂಗಳˆರು

R.N.I. No. KARBIL/2001/47147 POSTAL REGN. No. RNP/KA/BGS/2202/2017-19

Licensed to post without prepayment WPP No. 297

THAMMAIAH

Digitally signed by THAMMAIAH

DN: c=IN, o=Centre for e-Governance, 2.5.4.20=be54f34f4e31eae50203ca7fab5ceb3794f20a8460a2582ef28294d43b8f8b16, ou=department of printing stationery

and Publication,CID - 7048443, postalCode=560001, st=Karnataka, serialNumber=4d9b284dcc53d39f1425f50485de07dd86efa302a3fce3729eddea0c1b5098e0,

cn=THAMMAIAH

Date: 2025.12.17 17:59:21 +05'30'