(909)

RNI No. KARBIL/2001/47147

¨sÁUÀ 3

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DAiÀiÁ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ

¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ

IN THE COURT OF COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION BIDAR

No. LOB/WCA/Cr-No. 02/013, Dated: 08/01/013

Applicants :

V/s

Respondents:

1) Smt. Reshma W/o Late Nabisab

Age: 24 years occ: Household

R/o Village Jambagi Tq Aurad

Dist Bidar & two others

1) Shaik Moiz Proprietor of Samreen Trans,

H.No. 23-2-164 Moghalpura, Opposite Nayab function plaza Lane, Hyd-500064.

2) M/s. Bajaj Allianz Gen-Ins, Com.Ltd., WIE Plaza, Airport Road, Yerwad, Pune,

With its Policy and servicing office at PNR/SSV, Complex 304, Plot No, A-13,

Rukminipuram, A.S. Road nagar Hyd- Represented by its authorised officer.

PROCLAMATION

Smt. Reshma W/o. Late Nabisab R/o. Jambgi Tq, Aurad, have/has filed Application in this court claiming compensation

stating that Late. Nabisab was working as Driver under Respondent No.01 he met with an accident arising out of and during the course

of employment as a result he died on, 21/3/2012.

Wherefore, it is hereby notified for the information of these concerned that other dependents if any may file their claim

application and objections within 30 days from the date of publication of this proclamation, if no applications on objections are received

within the specified date the court will proceeded further in the matter.

P.R. 167

SC-10

Commissioner for Workmen’s

Compensation, Bidar

IN THE COURT OF 2ND FTC COURT, BANGALORE CITY

It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as

unclaimed and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put

their claim one month from the date of this publication.

Bangalore City

2ND FTC Bangalore city.

List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.

SL. No.

CR.No & P.F.No

VEHICLE & REG No

ENGINE.NO

CHASSIS NO

01

85/2003

P.F.NO 32/2003

YAMAHA RX-100

KA-02-Q-7851

1L5075937

97AIL5075937

Bangalore City

P.R. 164

SC - 5

2ND FTC,

Bangalore City

¸ÀA¥ÀÄl 148

Volume 148

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 9, 2013 (ªÉʱÁR 19, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1935)

Bangalore, Thursday, May 9, 2013 (Vaishakha 19, Shaka Varsha 1935)

¸ÀAaPÉ 19

Issue 19

910

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE 6TH ADITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN

MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE CITY.

It hereby notified to the public that the Adugodi Police station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as unclaimed

and such vehicles are lying in the police Station as unclaimed so far, I Hence the Owner of Properties {vehicles} may put their claim one

month from the date of publication.

Bangalore City

Dated : 05-02-2013

6th A C M Magistrate,

Bangalore City.

List of the seized vehicles are lying in the Adugodi Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under C.miss

SL

No.

C.MIS

No.

VEHICLE NAME

AND No.

COLOR

ENGINE

No.

CHASSIS No.

1

53/2010

T.V.S. VICTOR KA03 EU7698

BLACK

OFIB51492835

MD625AF1152P72253-

2

54/2010

SUZUKI SUMARAI NIL

BLACK

7712M979457

7712F932740

3

469/11

HERO HONDA SPLENDOR

TN-07, AA-6337

BLACK

03F20C49489

--

4

11/12

YAMAHA 135 KA-03H-2593

BLACK

160316902

5

12/12

KAVASAKI BAJAJ KA-22J-3444

BLACK

36M95B17448

80F95B14221

6

13/12

SUZUKI SAMURAI KA-03R-6684

BLACK

7604M677158

7604F632610

7

14/12

YAMAHA GRU-1796

BLACK

ILIG45003

1046030

8

15/12

SUZUKI MAX- CKL-4655

BLACK

3607M081724

3607F75580

9

16/12

HONDA MARVEL KA-15E-7836

BLACK

015312KIEDJ

KIFDJ0177

10

17/12

TVS MOPED CAO-9334

GREEN

148010272068101

11

18/12

TVS XL heavy duty KA-04EC-68

GREEN

P1202M539271

P302F547710

12

19/12

BAJAJ CHETAK CAX-3591

GREY

05E347818

05C317752

13

20/12

KAVASAKI BAJAJ KL-03, B-2866

BLACK

51M95151647

31F95L48844

14

23/12

HONDACTIVA KA-05EH-5814

BLACK

NIEUA255981

NIFVA252940

15

24/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-01E-2377

GREY

E06DA321938

--

16

25/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-05Q-1669

LIGHT GREEN

60F94J12185

94J12185

17

36/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-05E-3366

GREEN

06E1125201

06C108873

18

39/12

BAJAJ CHETAK CKS-3485

GREY

06E953475

--

19

-do-

YAMAHA RX KA-03EA-1219

BLACK

4T0522681

04T522681

20

40/12

SUZUKI SAMURAI CAQ-9627

WHITE

3412M631816

BE11A05642

21

-do-

YAMAHA MP-20M-2939

RED

1L1511017

95DIL511147

22

42/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-22J-6688

GREY

05695165890

23

-do-

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-02, R-8325

GREY

9366110

899708

24

44/12

SUJUKI SAMURAI KA-19L-2504

BLACK

7008M773939

008F721663

25

Cimis

No.45/12

TVS XL KA-05, EN-6137

GREEN

P3306F78875

P1306M785090

26

47/12

KENETIC HONDA KA-03R-5552

BLACK

619291NIEMH

NIFMLI656007

27

48/12

BAJAJ PULSER KA-03EM-782

RED

DHGBKK80429

DHVBAK80706

28

49/12

SUZUKI SHOGUN KA-05Q-5801

BLACK

8504M545101

803045502037

29

50/12

BAJAJ PULSER KA-01EB-1524

SILVER

DHGBML09365

MD2DDHDH22MC

30

51/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-01 H-4113

BULE

MO6DC189797

F06DC130696

31

52/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-05 EF-3885

BLUE

CDEBGH0951

06CBGH36751

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

911

SL

No.

C.MIS

No.

VEHICLE NAME

AND No.

COLOR

ENGINE

No.

CHASSIS No.

32

54/12

HERO HONDA PASSION

AP-28 L-8344

BLACK

04GO8M56722

04GD9C5579

33

55/12

KINETIC HONDA KA-05J-1236

WHITE

293416NIEHG

34

56/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-01L-3098

BLUE

35M96J83676

35

57/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-02 E-474

GREEN

W06B113456

W0601138569

36

58/12

KINETIC HONDA KA-05, S-2052

BLUE

NIEMH665728

37

60/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-03, J-2811

GREY

M060C230112

F06DE235880

38

61/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-04 J-495

GREY

M06DE218983

F06E235451

39

65/12

BAJAJ CHETAK KA-04 X-8587

GREEN

CDPBGB48489

D6BBGB53143

40

66/12

TVS XL KA-05 EY-851

GREEN

0D1P41295285

MD621BDE154183

41

71/12

TVS SCOOTY KA-05 X-3298

GREEN

K98CM174240

42

-do-

KINETIC HONDA KA-05 EA-84

BLACK

153438NIETA

43

72/12

KINETIC HONDA CKJ-4488

SILVER

715088NIEML

44

3/12

TVS SCOOTY KA-01 R 1265

RED

KA99EM29199

45

-do-

TVS SCOOTY KA-01 S-9137

GREEN

KO1LMC49588

46

88/12

TVS WEGO KL-07BQ-6492

BLACK

0G4BB1110361

47

89/12

TVS SCOOTY KA-04 ER-1535

RED

063H62191424

48

104/12

BAJAJ CT 100 KA-03 EQ 4430

BLACK

DUM6LH49128

DUFDLH663863

49

116/12

BAJAJ PULSAR KA-03 EG- 2571

BLUE

JCGBIH27384

MD2DHJCZZTCH27405

50

118/2012

BAJAJ C.T.100 NIL

BLACK

DHGBMF95377

DSII,F 82163

51

119/2012

HERO HONDA KA-04J7976

BLACK

93E10510560

-

52

120/12012

YAMAHA ENTICER KA-02EF 5675

BLACK

SUSOO5123

02HSUS005128

53

121/2012

YAMAH CK09323

BLACK

BLACK

ID1049445

ILI049445

P.R. 149

SC-5

6th A C M Magistrate,

Bangalore.

COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,

(KARNATAKA), BANGALORE-CLARIFICATION UNDER SECTION 59(4) OF

THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003.

Sub:

KVAT Act, 2003- Clarification under Section 59(4) regarding the rate of tax

applicable on ‘Flour Milling Pulveriser’-reg.

Ref :

Application dated: 20-10-2012 of Sri Shaji K.N., Proprietor, M/s. Lakshmi

Machineries, Bangalore. (TIN 29330739601)

In the application cited above of Sri Shaji K.N., Proprietor, M/s. Lakshmi Machineries, No.846/2, SRS Bus Stop, Tumkur

Road, Peenya 1st Stage, Bangalore-560058 has sought clarification regarding the rate of tax application on ‘Flour Milling Pulveriser’.

2. Section 59(4) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 empowers the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to clarify the

rate of tax payable under the Act, if he considers it necessary or expedient so to do, for the purpose of maintaining uniformity in the work

of assessments and collection of revenue. It is examined and found that the clarification requested by the petitioner is within the scope

of the aforesaid provision and it is necessary that the clarification be issued for the purpose of maintaining uniformity in the work of

assessments and collection of revenue.

3. Hence the following clarification is issued.

912

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

CLARIFICATION NO.CLR.CR.141/12-13, DATED: 23-01-2013

It is clarified that ‘Flour Milling Pulveriser’ is liable to tax at 14.5% from 01-08-2012 under Section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Karnataka

Value Added Tax Act,2003.

P.R. 150

SC-100

YOGENDRA TRIPATHI

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka), Bangalore

COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,

(KARNATAKA), BANGALORE-CLARIFICATION UNDER SECTION 12 (7)

OF THE KARNATAKA TAX ON ENTRY OF GOODS ACT, 1979

Sub :

KTEG Act, 1979 – clarification of rate of tax on unmanufactured tobacco – reg.

Ref :

Application dated: 28-09-2012 of Sri Vittal A.Nayak, Proprietor of M/s

Mahadevi Enterprises, Udupi- TIN 29280748989.

In the application cited above, Sri Vittal A.Nayak, proprietor of M/S Mahadevi Enterprises, Mythri Complex, Udupi- 576 101

has sought clarification regarding the rate of entry tax on unmanufactured tobacco.

2. Section 12(7) of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 empowers the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to

clarify the rate of tax payable under the Act, if he considers it necessary or expendient so to do, for the purpose of maintaining uniformity

in the work assessments and collection of revenue. It is examined and found that the clarification requested by the petitioner is within

the scope of the aforesaid provision and it is necessary that the clarification be issued for the purpose of maintaining uniformity in the

work of assessments and collection of revenue.

3. Hence, the following clarification is issued.

CLARIFICATION NO. KTEG/CLR/CR-12/2012-13, DATED: 02-02-2013

It is clarified that ‘unmanufactured tobacco’ in sachets is liable to entry tax at 2% with effect from 01-04-2010 in terms of

Notification No.FD 86 CSL 10, dated: 31-03-2010.

P.R. 151

SC-100

YOGENDRA TRIPATHI

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka), Bangalore

eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. 1£Éà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.

C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É

¸ÀASÉå: 01/2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08.02.2013.

¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥ÀæZÀgÀ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ, eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. 1£Éà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉ E°è «¯ÉêÁjAiÀiÁzÀ

¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è d¦Û ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ F PɼÀPÁt¹zÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ E®èzÉà ºÁUÉà EzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀÅUÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ

AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè F ¥ÀæPÀluÉ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ MAzÀÄ wAUÀ¼À M¼ÀUÁV ¸ÀÆPÀÛ zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹ ªÀ±ÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÀÄzÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É AiÀiÁgÀÄ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¨ÁgÀzÉà ºÉÆÃzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

PÀæªÀÄ

¸ÀASÉå

ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ¸ÀASÉå

¦.Dgï. £ÀA§gÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

¦.J¥sï. ¸ÀASÉå, ¢£ÁAPÀ

£ÉÆÃAzÀt ¸ÀASÉå

EAf£ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ZÁ¹¸ï ¸ÀASÉå

1

¹.¹. ¸ÀASÉå: 993/2008 UÀÄ£Éß

¸ÀASÉå: 52/2008 UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ

¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.

PÀ®A. 279, 337 C¥sï L¦¹.

¦.Dgï. 97/2008,

¦.J¥sï.¸ÀASÉå: 32/2008

¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.04.2008.

PÉJ-17-eÉ-4538 £ÉÃ

§eÁeï ZÉÃvÀPï ¸ÀÆÌlgï

--

2

¹.¹. ¸ÀASÉå: 886/2008

UÀÄ£Éß ¸ÀASÉå: 80/2007

«zÁå£ÀUÀgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ,

zÁªÀtUÉgÉ. PÀ®A. 98 PÉ.¦. DPïÖ.

¦.Dgï. 14/2009,

¦.J¥sï.¸ÀASÉå: 32/2007

¢£ÁAPÀ: 06.08.2007.

(2) MAzÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà §tÚzÀ

»gÉÆÃ ºÉÆAqÁ ¸ÉàAqÀgï

ªÉÆÃmÁgï ¸ÉÊPÀ¯ï

£ÀA§gï ¥ÉèÃmï E®è.

(3) MAzÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà §tÚzÀ

»gÉÆÃ ºÉÆAqÁ ¹r-

100 J¸ï.J¸ï. JAzÀÄ

EzÀÄÝ PÉ-05-J¯ï-4727.

(1) EAf£ï £ÀA§gï ZÁ¹

£ÀA§gï C½¹zÀAvÉ PÀAqÀÄ

§gÀÄwÛzÉ.

(2) EAf£ï ¸ÀASÉå:

94-F-10E-06874,

ZÁ¹ ¸ÀASÉå: 94-F-12F-04586.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

913

3

¹.¹. ¸ÀASÉå: 414/2007

UÀÄ£Éß ¸ÀASÉå: 128/2006

UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ,

zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.

PÀ®A. 465 D¥sï L.¦.¹.

ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ®A. 98 PÉ.¦. DPïÖ.

¦.Dgï. 117/2008,

¦.J¥sï.¸ÀASÉå: 40/2006

¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.06.2006.

ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

¦.J¥sï. ¸ÀASÉå: 41/2006

¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.06.2006.

PÉJ-17-J¯ï-346£ÉÃ

¸ÀÄdÄQ

¸ÀªÀÄÄgÁAiÀiï

ªÉÆÃmÁgï ¨ÉÊPï.

PÉJ-16-PÉ-8529

£ÉÃ

n«J¸ï

«PÀÖgï

ªÉÆÃmÁgï ¨ÉÊPï.

ZÁ¹ £ÀA§gï PÀAqÀħgÀĪÀÅ¢®è,

EAf£ï ¸ÀASÉå: 7704M840322,

EAf£ï ¸ÀASÉå: N3204,

M078068, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

ZÁ¹ ¸ÀASÉå: N3204, F-077710.

P.R. 153

SC-5

eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. 1£Éà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,

zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.

¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉ

¥Éưøï PÀ«ÄõÀ£ÀgïgÀªÀgÀ PÀbÉÃj,

£ÀA.1, E£ï ¥ÉAnæ gÀ¸ÉÛ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ.

C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É

¸ÀASÉå. 02/C¸ÀÆ/C¹¦/¸ÀA«/2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11-02-2013

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ PÀ§â£ï ¥ÁPïð ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÁ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛªÀÅ ºÀÈzÀAiÀĨsÁUÀzÀ°èzÀÄÝ £ÀUÀgÀ £Á£Á ¨sÁUÀUÀ½UÉ

¸ÀA¥ÀPÀð PÀ°à¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR ªÀÈvÀÛªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ªÀÈvÀÛªÀÅ ¢£ÀzÀ 24 UÀAmÉAiÀÄÆ C¢üPÀ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀAZÁgÀ MvÀÛqÀ¢AzÀ PÀÆrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ

»vÁzÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀÄUÀªÀĪÁV ¥ÁzÀZÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ¸ÁUÀ®Ä F ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ°è £ÀÆvÀ£ÀªÁV ¸ÀéAiÀÄAZÁ°vÀ ¹UÀß¯ï ¢Ã¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß

C¼ÀªÀr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ°è ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ E£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ£À jÃwAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÄUÀªÀĪÁV ¸ÁUÀ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀĪÀAvÉ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛ¢AzÀ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï

¯Éʧæj dAPÀë£ï ªÀgÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ eÁjAiÀİègÀĪÀ ¢éªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹ KPÀ ªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÁjUÉ vÀgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ

CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

EzÀ®èzÉ, PÀ§â£ï¥ÁPïð M¼À¨sÁUÀzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ°è ¹zÀݰAUÀAiÀÄå ªÀÈvÀÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÀqÀì£ï ªÀÈvÀÛ¢AzÀ §AzÀAvÀºÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀgÁåAiÀÄ

ªÀiÁUÀðªÁV PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ qÁ: ©.Dgï. CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ ªÀgÉUÉ

gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ JgÀqÀÆ §¢UÀ¼À°è ªÁºÀ£À ¤®ÄUÀqÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤µÉâü¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

DzÀÝjAzÀ PÀ®A 115 ªÉÆÃmÁgï ªÁºÀ£À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1988 ºÁUÀÆ PÀ®A 3 mÁæ¦üPï PÀAmÉÆæÃ¯ï DPïÖ 1960gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ £À£ÀUÉ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ

C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ ©.f. eÉÆåÃw¥ÀæPÁ±ï «Äfð, L¦J¸ï. ¥Éưøï PÀ«ÄõÀ£Àgï, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ§â£ï ¥ÁPïð

¸ÀAZÁgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÁ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀİè KPÀªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£À ¤®ÄUÀqÉ ¤µÉÃzsÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ

ªÀiÁ¥ÁðqÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr eÁjUÉ vÀgÀ®Ä DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

1.

±ÉõÁ¢æ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ PÀqÉUÉ EgÀĪÀ ¢éªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀİè

PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛ¢AzÀ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ïªÀgÉUÉ ¥À²ÑªÀÄ¢AzÀ ¥ÀƪÀðzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ¸ÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀAZÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß

AiÀÄxÁ¹ÜwAiÀİè G½¹PÉÆAqÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¢QÌ£À ¸ÀAZÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß CAzÀgÉ ¥ÀƪÀð¢AzÀ ¥À²ÑªÀÄzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï

¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ¸ÀAZÀj¸ÀĪÀ J¯Áè ªÀiÁzÀjAiÀÄ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀAZÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß

¤µÉâü¸À¯ÁVzÉ. F ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ J£ï.f.N. PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄAzÉ JqÀ wgÀĪÀÅ

¥ÀqÉzÀÄ JA.J¸ï. ©°ØAUï ªÀÄÄA¨sÁUÀzÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ qÁ: ©.Dgï. CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï gÀ¸ÉÛ ¸ÉÃj C°èAzÀ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛPÉÌ

vÀ®Ä¥À®Ä C£ÀĪÀÅ ªÀiÁqÀPÉÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.

2.

PÀ§â£ï¥ÁPïð M¼À¨sÁUÀzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ qÁ: ©.Dgï. CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ

(J£ï.f.N PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄA¨sÁUÀzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛ) gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ JgÀqÀÆ §¢UÀ¼À°è ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À ¤®ÄUÀqÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤µÉâü¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

CAvÉAiÉÄà PÀ®A 116 ªÉÆÃmÁgï ªÁºÀ£À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1988 ºÁUÀÆ PÀ®A 4 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ mÁæ¦üPï PÀAmÉÆæÃ¯ï DPïÖ 1960 gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ

C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ªÉÄîÌAqÀ KPÀ ªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£À ¤®ÄUÀqÉ ¤µÉÃzsÀzÀ ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀiÁ¥ÁðqÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ CUÀvÀå ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥sÀ®PÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¸ÀܼÀUÀ¼À°è C¼ÀªÀr¸À®Ä ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

F ªÉÄîÌAqÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12-02-2013 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £Á£ÀÄ F ¢ªÀ¸À CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ £À£Àß ¸À» ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

P.R. 154

SC-100

©.f. eÉÆåÃw¥ÀæPÁ±ï «Äfð

¥Éưøï PÀ«ÄõÀ£Àgï,

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ.

914

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÁ«ÄðPÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ PÁ«ÄðPÀgÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, G¥À-«¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj

¸ÀA.PÁC§-1/PÁ£À¥À/¹Dgï-06/2013/3108, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02-02-2013

CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ

¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ

1)

²æÃªÀÄw. «±Á® @ «±Á¯ÁQë UÀAqÀ ¢||

§¸ÀªÀgÁd, ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 25 ªÀµÀð, (ªÀÄÈvÀ£À

ºÉAqÀw)

2) PÀĪÀiÁgÀ.

¸ÀÄ«ÄvÀæ

vÀAzÉ

§¸ÀªÀgÁd,

ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 3 ªÀµÀð.

3) ²æÃªÀÄw PÀªÀÄ®ªÀÄä UÀAqÀ ¢|| «ÃgÉñÀ,

(ªÀÄÈvÀ£À vÁ¬Ä)

ªÁ¸À ¸ÉÆÃªÀĸÀªÀÄÄzÀæ UÁæªÀÄ, §¼Áîj.

«gÀÄzÀÞ

1)

²æÃ C±ÉÆÃPÀ PÀĪÀiÁgï vÀAzÉ PÉ. ¥ÀgÀ±ÀÄgÁªÀÄ

gÁªï. ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 45 ªÀµÀð, ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ DmÉÆÃ

¸ÀASÉå PÉJ-34/J2235, ªÁ¸À-ªÁqïð £ÀA-13,

ªÀÄÆgÁj ©°ØAUï »A¨sÁUÀ, zÉë ¤ªÁ¸À §¼Áîj.

2) ¢|| r«f£À¯ï ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï

ªÉÄ|| AiÀÄÄ£ÉÊmÉqï EArAiÀiÁ E£ï±ÀÆågÉ£ïì PÀA¥À¤,

°«ÄmÉqï., PÉ.¹. gÀ¸ÉÛ JzÀÄgÀÄUÀqÉ gÁ¢üPÀ mÁQøï

ºÀwÛgÀ, §¼Áîj.

: ¥ÀæPÀluÉ :

F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ (1 jAzÀ 3) CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÈvÀ §¸ÀªÀgÁd, 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ°è

ZÁ®PÀ£ÁV PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-02-2012 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀWÁvÀQÌÃqÁV ªÀÄÈvÀ¥ÀnÖzÁÝ£ÉAzÀÄ w½¹ vÁªÀÅ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ

ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ®A©vÀgÉAzÀÄ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ PÉÆÃj zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀjUÀÆ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ, CªÀ®A©vÀgÀÄ

JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÁzÀgÉ CAxÀªÀgÀÄ F ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀªÀ®AiÀÄ

ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁªÀÄ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀn¹zÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÉãÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè

w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃj §AzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

P.R. 155

SC-5

PÁ«ÄðPÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

PÁ«ÄðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ

§¼Áîj G¥À «¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj.

PÁ«ÄðPÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ PÁ«ÄðPÀgÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,

G¥À-«¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj

¸ÀA.PÁC§-1/PÁ£À¥À/¹Dgï-03/2013/3111, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-02-2013

CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ

¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ

1)

²æÃªÀÄw.

ºÉÆ£ÀÆßgï

©Ã

UÀAqÀ

¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï ¸Á¨ï @ EªÀİ ¸Á¨ï.

ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì: 45 ªÀµÀð, (ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À vÁ¬Ä)

2) PÀĪÀiÁj ±À©Ã£Á ©Ã vÀAzÉ ¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï

¸Á¨ï @ EªÀİ ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 16 ªÀµÀð.

3) PÀĪÀiÁj

ªÀi˯Á°

¸Á¨ï

vÀAzÉ

¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï ¸Á¨ï @ EªÀİ ¸Á¨ï.

ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 15 ªÀµÀð.

ªÁ¸À: CUÀ®ÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄ, ¹gÀÄUÀÄ¥Àà vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ,

§¼Áîj f¯Éè.

«gÀÄzÀÞ

1) ²æÃ.

¹.JA.zÀÄUÀðAiÀÄå

vÀAzÉ

¹.

ªÀÄjAiÀÄ¥Àà.

ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ mÁæPïÖgï ¸ÀASÉå:

PÉJ-35/n-3988.

ªÁ¸À: §¸À¥ÀÄgÀ UÁæªÀÄ, ªÀqÀÄØ CAZÉ.,

ºÉƸÀ¥ÉÃmÉ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ §¼Áîj f¯Éè.

2) ¢ ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï.

ªÉÄ|| ZÉÆÃ¼ÀªÀÄAqÀ®A d£ÀgÀ¯ï E£ÀÆågÉ£ïì PÀA¥À¤

°«ÄmÉqï., §¼Áîj.

3) ²æÃ ¸ÀÄzsÁPÀgï UËqÀ vÀAzÉ ¥ÉÆA¥À£ÀUËqÀ,

ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ mÉæöÊ®gï ¸ÀA:

PÉJ-34/nJ-2057.

ªÁ¸À: eÁ°¨ÉAa UÁæªÀÄ, §¼Áîj.

4) ¢ ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï.

ªÉÄ|| ºÉZï.r.J¥sï.¹. EDgïfN. d£ÀgÀ¯ï E£ÀÆågÉ£ïì

PÀA¥À¤ °«ÄmÉqï, §¼Áîj.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

915

: ¥ÀæPÀluÉ :

F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ (1 jAzÀ 3) CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÈvÀ ±ÀjÃ¥sÀªÀÄä @ ±ÀjÃ¥sÁ vÀAzÉ ¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï ¸Á¨ï

@ EªÀİ ¸Á¨ï. 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ°è ºÀªÀiÁ°AiÀiÁV PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:30-08-2012 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀWÁvÀQÌÃqÁV

ªÀÄÈvÀ¥ÀnÖzÁݼÉAzÀÄ w½¹ vÁªÀÅ ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ®A©vÀgÉAzÀÄ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ PÉÆÃj zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀjUÀÆ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ, CªÀ®A©vÀgÀÄ

JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÁzÀgÉ CAxÀªÀgÀÄ F ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀªÀ®AiÀÄ

ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁªÀÄ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀn¹zÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÉãÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè

w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃj §AzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

P.R. 156

SC-5

PÁ«ÄðPÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁ«ÄðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ

§¼Áîj G¥À «¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj.

PÁ«ÄðPÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ PÁ«ÄðPÀgÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,

G¥À-«¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj

¸ÀA.PÁC§-1/PÁ£À¥À/¹Dgï-01/2013/3116, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-02-2013

CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ

¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ

1)

²æÃªÀÄw. FgÀPÀÌ @ ºÀjd£À FgÀPÀÌ UÀAqÀ ¢|| ºÀjd£À N§tÚ

@ ºÉZï. N§tÚ, ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 46 ªÀµÀð. (ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ºÉAqÀw)

2) ²æÃ. ªÀįÉïÁ ªÀiÁgÉ¥Àà @ ºÀjd£À ªÀiÁgÉ¥Àà vÀAzÉ ºÀjd£À

N§tÚ

@

ºÉZï.

N§tÚ.

(ªÀÄÈvÀ£À

ªÀÄUÀ)

ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 35 ªÀµÀð.

3) ²æÃ ºÀjd£À w¥ÉàøÁé«Ä @ w¥ÉàøÁé«Ä vÀAzÉ ºÀjd£À N§tÚ

@ ºÉZï N§tÚ. (ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÀÄUÀ) ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 30 ªÀµÀð.

ªÁ¸À: §æºÀä¥ÀÄgÀºÀ½î, GgÀªÀPÉÆAqÀ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ,

ºÁ° ªÁ¸À: ±Á¹Ûçà £ÀUÀgÀ §¼Áîj.

«gÀÄzÀÞ

1)

²æÃªÀÄw J. ¸ÀgÉÆÃd UÀAqÀ J.

gÁªÀİAUÉñÀégÀ gÉrØ, ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ ¯Áj ¸ÀASÉå:

PÉJ-40/3618.

ªÁ¸À:- ¥Éưøï PÁélðgïì, ¥Àæ±ÁAvï £ÀUÀgÀ,

§¼Áîj f¯Éè.

2) ¢ ¨ÁæAZï ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï.

ªÉÄ|| j®AiÀÄ£ïì d£ÀgÀ¯ï E£ÀÆågÉ£ïì PÀA¥À¤

°«ÄmÉqï., ¥ÁªÀðw £ÀUÀgÀ, §¼Áîj.

: ¥ÀæPÀluÉ :

F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ (1 jAzÀ 3) CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÈvÀ ºÀjd£À N§tÚ @ ºÉZï. N§tÚ vÀAzÉ wªÀÄä¥Àà.

1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ°è QèãÀgï£ÁV PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12-02-2009 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀWÁvÀQÌÃqÁV ªÀÄÈvÀ¥ÀnÖzÁÝ£ÉAzÀÄ w½¹

vÁªÀÅ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ®A©vÀgÉAzÀÄ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ PÉÆÃj zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀjUÀÆ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ, CªÀ®A©vÀgÀÄ

JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÁzÀgÉ CAxÀªÀgÀÄ F ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀªÀ®AiÀÄ

ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁªÀÄ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀn¹zÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÉãÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè

w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃj §AzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

P.R. 157

SC-5

PÁ«ÄðPÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁ«ÄðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ

§¼Áîj G¥À «¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj.

KARNATAKA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD

Office of the Chief Executive Officer,

Koushalya Bhavan, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore-560029,

No: CWWB/RGN/CR-01/2012-13, Date: 06-11-2012.

EXECUTIVE ORDER

Sub :

Authorization to M/s Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Bangalore for

registration of construction workers as beneficiaries under the provisions of BOCW

Act, 1996.

Ref :

1. Proceedings of the 10th Board meeting held on 22-08-2012.

2. Letter No. BMRCL/HRD/No.142/2009/5304, dated: 22-10-2012 received from

General Manager Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Bangalore.

916

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

The Board in its meeting held on 22-08-2012 had resolved that, Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Bangalore shall be

authorized to register the construction workers working in BMRCL project sites as beneficiaries under Building & Other Construction

Workers’ Act, 1996.

The General Manager, Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited in his letter dated: 22-10-2012 cited under reference (2)

above has furnished the list of the designated officers along with the details of their jurisdiction respectively to this office, who may be

authorized in this regard.

Therefore as per section 12(2) of the Building & Other Construction Workers’ (Regulations of Employment and Conditions of

the Services) Act, 1996, the following designated officers of Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited are hereby authorized to register

the construction workers engaged by them as beneficiaries in their project sites as mentioned in the table mentioned below.

Sl. No.

Designation of the officer

Assigned local limits

1

Chief Engineer

Reach-1 (Cricket stadium to Bayappanahalli)

2

Chief Engineer

Reach-2 (Leprosy Hospital to Mysore terminal)

3

Chief Engineer

Reach-3,

3a

and

3b

(Swastik

to

Yeshwanthpur,

Yeshwanthpur to Peenya Depot and Peenya village to

Hesaraghatta cross)

4

Chief Engineer

Reach-4 and 4a (KR Road to Puttenahalli cross terminal)

5

Chief Engineer

Under ground

P.R. 158

SC-100

Labour Commissioner & Chief Executive Officer.

IN THE COURT OF 4TH MMTC COURT, BANGALORE CITY

It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as unclaimed

and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put their claim

one month from the date of this publication.

Bangalore City

Dated :

4TH MMTC

Bangalore city

List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.

Sl. No

CR. NO & P.F No

VEHICLE & REG NO

ENGIN-NO

CHASSIS NO

1

18/13 U/S 98 K.P.ACT

P.F. NO 15 B/2013

1. HERO HONDA SPLENDOR

KA-02 EM-4902

04F16C31595

04F15M23022

2. HONDA ACTIVA

KA-01-Y-13

NO

JF608C0549389

2

18/13 U/S 98 K.P. ACT

P.F. NO 16/2013

1. BAJAJ SUPER

CTX-4649

NO

W05E083994

2. KINETIC HONDA

KA-03-L-6094

515117

327318NIE-HA

3. BAJAJ CHETAK

KA-05-H-9410

NO

EO6CM-313441

Bangalore City

P.R. 161

SC-5

4TH MMTC, Bangalore city

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

917

IN THE COURT OF 1ST ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY

It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as

unclaimed and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put

their claim within six months from the date of this publication.

Bangalore City

Dated :

1st ACMM Magistrate Court,

Bangalore city.

List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.

Sl. No.

NCR No

P.F. No

VEHICLE REG NO

CHASSIS NO

ENG-NO

1

14/2013

13/2013

KA-18-A-5851

AMFBLL01133

AAMBL423

2

18/2013

19/2013

KA-02-V-5164

31FBDE23740

31HBDE26743

3

21/2013

20/2013

KA-05-ER-4690

OHVBKJ62893

DHGBKJ62593

4

Cmiss No: 43/2013

15/2013 ‘A’

Yazidi 250 CC

-

-

Bangalore City

P.R. 162

1ST ACMM Magistrate Court,

Bangalore city

IN THE COURT OF 1ST ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY

It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as

unclaimed and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put

their claim within six months from the date of this publication.

Bangalore City

Dated :

1st ACMM

Magistrate Court, Bangalore city.

List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.

Sl

NCR No

P.F.No

VEHICLE

REG NO

CHASSIS NO

ENG-NO

1

145/2008

U/S 379 I.P.C

P.F. NO 03/2010

BAJAJ PULSOR

KA-01-EJ-9329

MD2DHJCZZRCD16315

JCGBR025129

P.R. 163

SC - 5

1ST ACMM Magistrate Court,

Bangalore city

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÉ

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À dAn ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¥ÁæAvÀ, ZÁªÀÄgÁd¥ÉÃmÉ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-18.

zÁªÁ ¸ÀASÉå : eÉDgï©/rLJ¸ï/167/1996-97

ªÁ¢ :

¥ÀæwªÁ¢ :

ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.

ZÁªÀÄgÁd¥ÉÃmÉ,

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 560 018.

«gÀÄzÀÞ

1. PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

2. qÁ|| ºÉZï.¦.±ÁAvÀPÀĪÀiÁgï,

©£ï.ºÉZï.PÉ.¥ÀÄlÖ¸Áé«Ä UËqÀ, CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ, £ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ

§¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-04.

918

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.

ZÁªÀÄgÁd¥ÉÃmÉ,

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 560 018.

«gÀÄzÀÞ

3. ²æÃ ¸ÀÄgÉñï,

©£ï ²æÃ gÀWÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

4. ²æÃ Cfvï J¸ï.ZÀqÀUÀgï,

©£ï ¸ÀvÀågÁeï ZÀqÀUÀgï,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

5. ²æÃ ©.eÉ.¸ÀÄgÉñï,

©£ï ¯ÉÃmï dªÀgÉÃUËqÀ,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

6. ²æÃªÀÄw PÉ.«.GµÁ,

PÉÆÃA ºÉZï.¦.±ÁAvÀPÀĪÀiÁgï,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

7. ²æÃªÀÄw ¸Á«vÀæªÀÄä,

PÉÆÃA ¯ÉÃmï PÉ.«ÃgÀAiÀÄå,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

8. ²æÃ zÉêÁ£ÀAzÀ ¥ÉÊ.PÉ.

©£ï UÉÆÃ¥Á® gÁªï PÉ.

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

9. ²æÃ G¯Áè¸ï J¸ï.

©£ï ¸ÀvÀågÁeï ZÀqÀUÀgï,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

10. ²æÃ £ÀgÀ¹AºÀAiÀÄå,

©£ï UÀAUÀtÚ,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

919

11. ²æÃ ºÀ£ÀĪÀÄPÀÌ PÉÆÃA £ÀgÀ¹AºÀAiÀÄå,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

12. ²æÃ «.J¸ï.£ÁAiÀÄÌ

©£ï ºÀjºÀgÀ £ÁAiÀÄÌ,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

13. ²æÃ PÉ.d£ÁzsÀð£À,

©£ï ¯ÉÃmï PÀȵÀÚ¥Àà,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

14. ²æÃ AiÀÄÄ.¸ÀzÁ²ªÀ±ÉnÖ,

©£ï AiÀÄÄ.¸ÀħâtÚ ±ÉnÖ,

¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,

£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,

£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.

15. ²æÃ £ÁgÁAiÀÄt UËqÀ, ªÉÄÃdgï,

©£ï ¥ÀÄmÉÖÃUËqÀ, ªÀiÁf CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ

ºÁUÀÆ FV£À ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

PÉgɯÁ®Ä ¸ÀAzÀæ, ªÀļÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ, PÀ¸À¨Á ºÉÆÃ§½,

PÀ£ÀPÀ¥ÀÄgÀ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.

16. ²æÃ J¸ï.f.ZɮĪÀAiÀÄå, ªÉÄÃdgï,

ªÀiÁf G¥ÁzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

¸ÉÆAqÉPÉÆ¥Àà, ¸ÉÆAqÉPÉÆ¥Àà ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ,

£É®ªÀÄAUÀ® vÁ:, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.

17. ²æÃ «.ZÀ£ÀߥÀà, ªÉÄÃdgï,

ªÀiÁf ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤., £ÉgÀ¼ÀWÀlÖ,

Ct¨É ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ, zÉÆqÀا¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ vÁ:,

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.

18. ²æÃ J. £ÀgÀ¹AºÀAiÀÄå,

ªÉÄÃdgï, ªÀiÁf ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

UÀAnUÁ£ÀºÀ½î ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ, PÀÄgÀĪÉÃUÉgÉ, zÉÆqÀا¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ

vÁ:, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.

19. ²æÃ J£ï.J¸ï.£ÀgÀ¸ÉÃUËqÀ,

ªÉÄÃdgï, ªÀiÁf ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

£ÀA.692, ‘J’ 8£Éà ªÉÄãï, 3£Éà ¸ÉÖÃeï, 3£Éà ¨ÁèPï,

§¸ÀªÉñÀégÀ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-79.

920

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

20. ²æÃ ©.gÁ«Ä gÉrØ. ªÉÄÃdgï,

ªÀiÁf ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

£ÀA.124, ‘J’ ¥ÉÆèÃgï, 26£Éà PÁæ¸ï, 6£Éà ¨ÁèPï,

dAiÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-20.

21. ²æÃ PÉ.n.ªÉAPÀl¸Áé«Ä, ªÉÄÃdgï,

ªÀiÁf ±ÁSÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ (¤ªÀÈvÀÛ),

PÉÃAzÀæ PÀbÉÃj ±ÁSÉ,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

£ÀA.1013 E, ªÀÄÆPÁA©PÀ J.Dgï,

CªÉ£ÀÆå, £ÀÆå w¥Àà¸ÀAzÀæ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-75.

22. ²æÃ JA.£ÁUÀgÁd,

(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï) ±ÁSÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ,

PÉÃAzÀæ PÉÃbÉÃj, ©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï

¤., ¢rبÁV®Ä, ªÀÄgÁoÀ ¹ÖçÃmï, vÁåUÀgÁd gÉÆÃqï,

D£ÉÃPÀ¯ï mË£ï, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.

23. ²æÃ ºÉZï.eÉ.gÀAUÀgÁdÄ,

(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï) ±ÁSÁ ¸ÀÆ¥ÀgïªÉʸÀgï,

PÉÃAzÀæ PÀbÉÃj, dƤAiÀÄgï C¹¸ÉÖAmï, ©r CAqï

©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤., £ÀA.213, 1£Éà PÁæ¸ï,

gÉªÉÆÌà ¯ÉÃOmï, «dAiÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-40.

24. ²æÃ gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ªÉÄÃdgï,

±ÁSÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ,

(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï), ©r CAqï

©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤., (¥Áè¤AUï &

qɪÀ®¥ïªÉÄAmï ±ÁSÉ), £ÀA.221, 5£Éà PÁæ¸ï,

1£Éà ªÉÄÊ£ï, 1£Éà ºÀAvÀ, PÉ.ºÉZï.©. PÁ¯ÉÆÃ¤.,

§¸ÀªÉñÀégÀ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-79

25. ²æÃ ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,

(¥Ëw) CªÀgÀ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ,

25. 1J. ²æÃªÀÄw ºÉZï.J¸ï.ºÀjtÂ,

PÉÆÃA: ¯ÉÃmï: ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,

1©. ²æÃ. QÃwð PÀAzÁ,

©£ï: ¯ÉÃmï: ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,

1¹. ²æÃ ZÀgÀuï,

©£ï ¯ÉÃmï: ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,

«¼Á¸À: £ÀA.112, L.¹.J¸ï.¹.ªÉÄÊ£ï gÉÆÃqï,

£ÁUÀgÀ¨sÁ«, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-72.

26. ²æÃ ©.ªÀÄÈvÀÄåAdAiÀÄ,

(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï), ¹Ã¤AiÀÄgï C¹¸ÉÖAmï,

©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,

(¥Áè¤AUï & qɪÀ®¥ïªÉÄAmï ±ÁSÉ), £ÀA.1087,

15£Éà © PÁæ¸ï, 2£Éà ºÀAvÀ, AiÀÄ®ºÀAPÀ £ÀÆå mË£ï,

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-64.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

921

“1959gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄ PÀ®A 103 gÀ jÃvÁå ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzÉñÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄ£Àß

d¦Û ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÉ w¼ÀĪÀ½PÉ £ÉÆÃn¸ÀÄ”

1.

ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1959gÀ PÀ®A 70gÀr zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹ 1 jAzÀ 30£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ½AzÀ

gÀÆ.4,36,78,537/- (gÀÆ.£Á®ÄÌ PÉÆÃn ªÀÄĪÀvÁÛgÀÄ ®PÀëzÀ J¥ÀàvÉÛAlÄ ¸Á«gÀ LzÀÄ £ÀÆgÀ ªÀÄÆªÀvÀÛÉüÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ) UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F ªÉÆvÀÛPÉÌ

¢£ÁAPÀ:24-05-1996 jAzÀ ¸Á°AiÀiÁ£À ±ÉÃ.22gÀµÀÄÖ §rØ zÀgÀzÀAvÉ C¸À®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ §rØ ªÀ¸ÀƯÁwUÁV zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ, F

zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ, «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqɸÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ. ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:03-12-2012 gÀAzÀÄ

¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ®A 103 gÀr CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw J£ï ¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï. «dAiÀÄ

PÁwðPï, gÀªÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ EgÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzÉñÀ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

2.

CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ PÀ®A 103gÀ Cfð eÉÆvÉ ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ

E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ 1994£Éà ¸Á°£À°è gÀzÀÄÝ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ UËgÀªÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¥Àæ²ß¹zÀÄÝ, jmï

C¦üÃ®Ä ¸ÀA.2218 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 2219 C/WÀ/1991 ºÁUÀÆ 1992/1994 F jmï C¦üð£À£ÀéAiÀÄ UËgÀªÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ 15 jAzÀ 19

gÀªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß Government Nominees as Ad-Hoc Committee members to from bank administration till holding of new election on

02-12-1994 CzÀgÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj CqÁPï PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:13-05-1994 gÀªÀgÉUÉ PÁgÀ太Àð»¹gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F CªÀ¢üAiÀİè 15£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ

CzsÀåPÀëgÁV PÁgÀ太À𻹠F CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¸Á®UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DzÀgÉ CqÁPï PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄÄ ªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ°è

gÀÆ.4,00,00,000/-PÉÌ ¢£ÁAPÀ:15-04-1995 gÀAzÀÄ Cfð ¸À°è¹ ¸Á®ªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DzÀgÉ F ¸Á® ªÀÄAdÆgÁwAiÀİè CqÁPï

PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄÄ UËgÀªÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¨ÉʯÁ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸Á®UÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£É ªÀiÁr, CfðzÁgÀ

¨ÁåAQUÉ ¸ÀļÀÄî ªÀiÁ»w ¤Ãr ªÉÆÃ¸À ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DzÀgÉ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ vÀ£Àß PÁgÀåZÀlĪÀnPÉ £ÀqɸÀzÉà EgÀĪÀAvÀºÀ

¹ÜwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ®Ä¦gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÀÄÄAzÉAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀºÀ PÁgÀåZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ E®èªÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÀUÀAqÀÄ PÀ®A 70gÀrAiÀİè zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß

ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F J¯Áè CªÀåªÀºÁgÀPÉÌ CqÁPï PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¨ÁåAQ£À £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ M¼ÀUÀÆr ªÉÊAiÀÄQÛPÀªÁV ªÀÄvÀÄÛ dAnAiÀiÁV

CªÀåªÀºÁgÀ £Àqɹ CfðzÁgÀ ¨ÁåAQ£À ¸Á®zÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆAqÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¨ÁåAQUÉ £ÀµÀÖ GAmÁUÀ®Ä PÁgÀt PÀvÀðgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

F »£É߯ÉAiÀİè zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. DzÀgÉ F zÁªÉ EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀĪÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ jÃvÁå £ÀqÀªÀ½PÉUÀ¼ÀÄ £Àqɹ EvÀåxÀð¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ°è

¸ÀªÀÄAiÀiÁªÀPÁ±À vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛzÀÄÝ, F ªÀÄzsÀå ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ºÉ¸Àj£À°ègÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁgÁl ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉUÀ½gÀÄvÀÛªÉ. MAzÀÄ

ªÉÃ¼É F jÃw ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ºÉ¸Àj£À°ègÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁgÁl ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è F zÁªÉAiÀÄ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ CfðzÁgÀ ¨ÁåAQ£À

¥ÀgÀªÁV §AzÀgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ CªÁqïð ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ¸Àư ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÀ ¥Àj¹Üw GAmÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ PÀ®A

103gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ Cfð DzsÁjvÀ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï ¸ÉÃjzÀ

¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzÉñÀPÉÌ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

3.

ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ PÀ®A 103gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ CfðAiÀİè w½¹gÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁV F ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼ÀÄ 19£ÉÃ

¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. DzÀgÉ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀévÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ

EgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è w½¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁV

19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ zÀÄgÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£É ºÁUÀÆ zÀÆgÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£É JgÀqÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr ªÁ¢ ¨ÁåAQ£À zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß

ªÀ¸ÀƯÁwUÉ zÁªÉ ºÀÆrgÀĪÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀİè vÀ£Àß ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ ¹ÜgÁ¹Û EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀAgÀQë¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ/«¯ÉªÁjªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀµÀÖ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀĪÀ

CA±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß CjwgÀĪÀ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ vÀ£Àß ªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÄÊ£Àgï EzÀÝ CªÀ¢üAiÀİè CªÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ

PÀAqÀħA¢gÀĪÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀİè PÀ®A 103gÀrAiÀİè w½¹gÀĪÀ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ (ºÁ° ªÉÄÃdgï) PÉÆÃA

Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï EªÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ EgÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß d¦üÛ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÉAzÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀqÀÄvÁÛ,

F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉñÀ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ £ÉÆÃn¸À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

“ DzÉñÀ ”

ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1959gÀ PÀ®A 70 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ®A 103 ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ

C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀA.¹N/139/¹JAJ¯ï/2010 ¢£ÁAPÀ:17-02-2011 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸ÀÄvÁÛ ©üêÀĸÉãÀ §APÀzÀ,

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À dAn ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¥ÁæAvÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA

Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï gÀªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°ègÀĪÀ F PɼÀV£À µÉqÀÆå¯ï£À°è PÁt¹gÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß µÀgÀwÛUÉÆ¼À¥ÀlÄÖ F ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ

CAwªÀÄ wæðUÉ d¦üÛ ¥ÀƪÀð DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä µÀgÀvÀÄÛ §zÀÞ £ÉÆÃn¸ÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ¹ävÀgÀªÀgÀÄ, MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É F d¦üÛ ¥ÀƪÀð £ÉÆÃn¹£À°è w½¹gÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß/¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ

¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F £ÉÆÃn¹¤AzÀ ªÀÄÄPÀÛ ªÀiÁr¹PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä EaÒ¹zÀ°è F zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ°è ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ PÉèöÊA ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ ªÉÆvÀÛ gÀÆ.4,36,78,537/-

(gÀÆ.£Á®ÄÌ PÉÆÃn ªÀÄĪÀvÁÛgÀÄ ®PÀëzÀ J¥ÀàvÉÛAlÄ ¸Á«gÀ LzÀÄ £ÀÆgÀ ªÀÄÆªÀvÀÛÉüÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ) UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÁ¢ ¨ÁåAQ£À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ SÁvÉUÉ F

DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ 30 ¢ªÀ¸ÀzÉÆ¼ÀUÁV dªÀiÁ ªÀiÁr C¢üPÀÈvÀ ZÀ®£ï/gÀ¹Ã¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ°è F DzÉñÀzÀ°è w½¹gÀĪÀ µÉqÀÆå¯ï

¸ÀévÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄPÀÛUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀ µÀgÀwÛUÉ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw ¹ävÀ gÀªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹gÀĪÀAvÉ F DzÉñÀ

ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ 30 ¢ªÀ¸ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÁV CªÀ±ÀåPÀ«gÀĪÀ £ÀUÀzÀÄ ¨sÀzÀævÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ®Ä «¥sÀ®gÁzÀ°è F DzÉñÀ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ £ÉÆÃn¹£À DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß

¹ÜjÃPÀj¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

F PɼÀUÉ µÉqÀÆå¯ï£À°è PÁt¹gÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß Rjâ¸ÀĪÀ°è D¸ÀQÛ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ªÀåQÛUÀ½UÉ F D¹Û ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ DzÉñÀªÀÅ

M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

922

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

“ µÉqÀÆå¯ï D¹Û «ªÀgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ”

All that piece and parcel of the agriculture property bearing Sy No.86/1, measuring 2 Acres 38 Guntas, Sy No 87/3 measuring

1 Acres 20 Guntas and Sy No 87/2, measuring 1 Acres 29 Guntas, in total 6 Acres 07 Guntas situated at Naranahalli Village, C.S.pura

Hobli, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur District and commonly Bounded as per registered Gift deed.

East by

: Property belongs Shubha N.

West by : Hemavathi Kaluve

North by : Property belongs to Siddegowda and Gangarevemma

South by : Property belongs to Ramaiah.

F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £À£Àß ¸À» ºÁUÀÆ PÀbÉÃj ªÉƺÀgÀÄ ¤²AiÉÆA¢UÉ F ¢£À CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

P.R. 209

©üêÀĸÉãÀ §APÀzÀ,

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À dAn ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ,

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¥ÁæAvÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ.

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, BANGALORE-1.

Consumer Price Index Numbers For Industrial Workers

No. DES 38 PWX 2012 December, 2012

State: Karnataka

Base: 1987-88=100

Date:16th February, 2013

Group/Sub-Group

Bellary

Bhadravathi

Davangere

Dandeli

Gulbarga

Harihar

Hassan

Mandya

Mangalore

Raichur

Tumkur

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

I.

FOOD:

a) Cereals & Products

778

847

956

819

752

839

812

871

649

869

721

b) Pulses & Products

696

771

811

852

752

736

700

816

684

755

734

c) Oil & Fats

372

416

430

384

489

420

461

498

273

511

442

d) Meat, Fish & Eggs

884

881

976

824

965

911

842

873

684

1072

850

e) Milk & Products

632

535

700

684

583

686

546

658

615

613

518

f) Condiments & Spices

532

602

801

852

421

486

616

603

525

714

632

g) Vegetables & Fruits

703

683

787

806

625

687

786

728

631

629

895

h) Other Food

578

826

681

681

620

568

634

638

525

578

558

FOOD GROUP INDEX

681

741

812

746

667

694

707

769

594

753

667

II.

Pan, Supari, Tobacco &

Intoxicants

767

800

808

586

574

756

692

691

523

637

716

III.

Fuel & Light

547

490

595

654

567

576

538

625

434

660

449

IV.

Housing

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

VI.

Clothing, Bedding &

Footwear

290

531

404

396

380

391

533

650

316

654

234

MISCELLANEOUS:

a) Medical Care

666

914

505

457

359

306

531

552

354

456

262

b) Education, Recreation &

Amusement

611

651

951

347

675

888

611

546

850

1118

809

c) Transport &

Communication

692

738

654

655

667

690

603

932

913

494

712

d) Personal Care & Effects

396

436

550

453

516

421

413

472

439

426

400

e) others

493

474

599

586

447

427

467

629

349

622

370

Miscellaneous group

531

581

647

480

525

524

500

578

575

610

477

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

923

GENERAL INDEX

553

600

647

586

530

552

583

642

508

638

473

To Convert To Base 1960

Multiply by Linking Factor

7.39

9.19

8.27

-

8.26

8.56

9.25

7.92

9.31

-

-

.

JOINT DIRECTOR,

Directorate of Economics & Statistics,

Government of Karnataka, Bangalore

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF LABOUR, LABOUR BUREAU

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NUMBERS FOR INDUSTRIAL WORKERS (BASE-2001=100)

Month: December, 2012

Group/Sub-Group/Centre

BANGALORE

BELGAUM

HUBLI -

DHARWAD

MERCARA

MYSORE

1

2

3

4

5

6

FOOD:

Cereals & Products

205

212

256

210

234

Pulses & Products

238

249

262

257

255

Oil & Fats

243

249

248

278

250

Meat, Fish & Eggs

281

312

314

258

287

Milk & Products

219

265

224

213

234

Condiments & Spices

238

207

253

231

234

Vegetables & Fruits

234

288

274

232

228

Other Food

272

257

253

248

238

FOOD GROUP

237

246

257

233

240

Pan, Supari, Tobacco & Intoxicants

207

219

217

185

266

Fuel & Light

165

180

180

342

187

Housing Index-

210

210

247

101

222

Clothing, Bleeding & Footwear

142

162

146

166

168

Miscellaneous:

Medical Care

236

201

201

185

177

Education, Recreation & Amusement

161

147

168

336

118

Transport & Communication

304

260

280

235

244

Personal Care & Effects

220

190

196

196

199

others

219

193

205

208

232

Miscellaneous Group

234

199

211

229

188

GENERAL INDEX

219

222

234

221

218

L.R.CHAUHAN,

ECONOMIC OFFICER,

P.R. 226

JOINT DIRECTOR,

Directorate of Economics & Statistics,

Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÉ

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, «Ä¤ «zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ, PÉÆoÀr ¸ÀASÉå: 305, 2£Éà ªÀĺÀr, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè,

vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄzÀ £ÀqÀªÀ½PÉUÀ¼ÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ :

¸ÀÜVvÀUÉÆArgÀĪÀ GuÉÚ PÉʪÀÄUÀÎ £ÉÃPÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¤., PÁªÀÄUÉÆAqÀ£ÀºÀ½î ²gÁ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ

F ¸ÀAWÀªÀ£ÀÄß IÄt¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£ÉUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

924

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

G¯ÉèÃR :

1)

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄzsÀÄVj G¥À«¨sÁUÀ ªÀÄzsÀÄVj EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ

¸ÀASÉå: ¸À¤33:JA.PÉn:¸ÀÜVvÀ:138/2011-12 ¢£ÁAPÀ : 29-02-2012

2)

F PÀbÉÃj¬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ ¤ÃrzÀ w¼ÀĪÀ½PÉ ¥ÀvÀæ

¸ÀASÉå:rDgïn:¸ÀÜVvÀ/2012-13, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 08-05-2012.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :-

¸ÀÜVvÀUÉÆAqÀ GuÉÚ PÉʪÀÄUÀÎ £ÉÃPÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¤., PÁªÀÄUÉÆAqÀ£ÀºÀ½î ²gÁ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ F ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ rDgïn:817/1955-56

¢£ÁAPÀ:

14-05-1956

gÀ°è

F

PÀbÉÃjAiÀİè

£ÉÆÃAzÀtÂAiÀiÁVzÀÄÝ

EzÀgÀ

PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄÄ

vÁ®ÆèPï

ªÀÄlÖQÌAvÀ

PÀrªÉÄ

PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄļÀîzÁÝVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ vÀ£Àß ¨ÉʯÁPÀÌ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸ÀzÉà F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÉÆÃµÀUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆArgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

1)

¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÀĺÁ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀzÉà EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAWÀ£É ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

2) ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼ÀÄ 1988-99£Éà ¸Á°£ÀªÀgÉUÉ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥Àj±ÉÆÃzsÀ£É DVzÀÄÝ F vÀºÀ¯ïªÀgÉ«UÀÆ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥Àj±ÉÆÃzsÀ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

3) ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸À¨sÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀzÉà ¨ÉʯÁ G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

4) ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄÄ ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀĪÁVzÀÄÝ FªÀgÉ«UÀÆ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ gÀZÀ£ÉUÉ PÀæªÀÄ«nÖgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ 2010-11gÀªÀgÉ«UÉ CªÀ¢ü ªÀÄÄV¢zÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 2010-11£Éà ¸Á®ÄUÀ¼À ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÀĺÁ¸À¨sÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ £ÀqɸÀ®Ä

«¥sÀ®ªÁV ¸ÀAWÀzÀ G¥À¤AiÀĪÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G®èAWÀ£É ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ, PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ªÀÄAqÀ½ C¹ÛvÀéPÉÌ PÀæªÀÄ«qÀzÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ

PÁAiÀÄð¸ÀÜVvÀ ¸ÀAWÀªÁV ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¥ÀÄ£ÀB±ÉÑÃvÀ£ÀPÉÌ D¸ÀQÛ vÉÆÃgÀ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ G¯ÉèÃR(2)gÀ°è

£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀAvÉ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ F PÀbÉÃj¬ÄAzÀ w¼ÀĪÀ½PÉ ¥ÀvÀæ ¤ÃqÀzÁUÀÆå F §UÉÎ AiÀiÁgÀÄ D¸ÀQÛ ªÀ»¸ÀzÀ PÁgÀt F

PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉñÀ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.

DzÉñÀ

¸ÀASÉå : rDgïn/J¯ïPÀÆår/¹Dgï64/2012-13, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 19-02-2013.

ºÉZï.¨Á®±ÉÃRgï PÉ.¹.J¸ï ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ

¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁ¬ÄzÉ 1959gÀ PÀ®A 72(2) (©) ºÁUÀÆ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå ¦.E/139/¹J¯ïJA/2010 ¢£ÁAPÀ:17-02-

2011gÀAvÉ zÀvÀÛªÁVgÀĪÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹ GuÉÚ PÉʪÀÄUÀÎ £ÉÃPÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¤., PÁªÀÄUÉÆAqÀ£ÀºÀ½î ²gÁ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ EzÀ£ÀÄß

¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£ÉUÉÆ½¹ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ C¢üPÁj PÀbÉÃj ²gÁgÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀAWÀzÀ IÄt ¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£Á¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV

£ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁr DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. IÄt ¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¥ÀÆtð ¥Àæ¨sÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖªÀjAzÀ ªÀ»¹PÉÆAqÀÄ

¥Àæ¨sÁgÀ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F PÀbÉÃjUÉ ¸À°è¸À®Ä w½¹zÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¯ÉêÁj ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä DzÀåvÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ¥ÀæwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

F PÀbÉÃjUÉ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÉ ¸À°è¹ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ DzÀåvÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ «¯ÉêÁj ªÀiÁr ¸ÀAWÀzÀ £ÉÆÃAzÀt gÀzÀÞwUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÉ ¸À°è¸À®Ä

DzÉò¹zÉ.

F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £À£Àß ¸À» ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 19-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

P.R. 228

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À-¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ,

vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ

²PÀët ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

wzÀÄÝ¥Àr

¸ÀASÉå: Er 271 rfJA 2012 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:04-03-2013.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå: Er 271 rfJA 2012 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-10-2012gÀ°è ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ UÀÆæ¥ï-J

QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ ²PÀëuÁ¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ vÀvÀìªÀiÁ£À ªÀÈAzÀzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CAwªÀÄ eÉåõÀ×vÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæPÀn¸À¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É

¸ÀASÉå: Er 101 rfN 2009, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-04-2010PÉÌ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ C£ÀħAzsÀzÀ°ègÀĪÀAvÉ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁr DzÉò¹zÉ.

PÀæ.

¸ÀA.

UÀÆæ¥ï J

QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂ

eÉåõÀ×vÁ

¸ÀASÉå

UÀÆæ¥ï ©

eÉåõÀ×vÁ

¸ÀASÉå

C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ

²æÃ/²æÃªÀÄw

d£Àä ¢£ÁAPÀ

UÀÆæ¥ï © ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ

£ÉêÀÄPÁw / §rÛ

ºÉÆA¢zÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ

UÀÆæ¥ï J

QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂUÉ

§rÛ ºÉÆA¢zÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ

µÀgÁ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

733

123

PÉ.PÁAvÀgÁdÄ

20-06-57

15-01-94

03-07-2007

734

123J

J.±ÁåªÀĸÀÄAzÀgï

23-07-63

22-01-94

03-07-2007

735

123 ©

PÉ.²ªÉÃUËqÀ

05-07-63

27-01-94

03-07-2007

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

925

PÀæ.

¸ÀA.

UÀÆæ¥ï J

QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂ

eÉåõÀ×vÁ

¸ÀASÉå

UÀÆæ¥ï ©

eÉåõÀ×vÁ

¸ÀASÉå

C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ

²æÃ/²æÃªÀÄw

d£Àä ¢£ÁAPÀ

UÀÆæ¥ï © ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ

£ÉêÀÄPÁw / §rÛ

ºÉÆA¢zÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ

UÀÆæ¥ï J

QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂUÉ

§rÛ ºÉÆA¢zÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ

µÀgÁ

736

124

n.J£ï.UÁAiÀÄwæzÉë

17-04-64

17-01-94

03-07-2007

737

125

¥ÀæPÁ±À ¹zÀÞ¥Àà ªÀÄ£ÀßAV

01-07-56

21-01-94

03-07-2007

738

126

©.gÁªÀiÁAd£ÉÃAiÀÄ

01-06-60

19-01-94

03-07-2007

739

126J

eÉ.©.ªÀĤßPÉÃj

15-11-63

01-02-94

03-07-2007

¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå

740

127

J£ï.PÉAZÉÃUËqÀ

05-03-63

01-02-94

03-07-2007

P.R. 220

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

²æÃ¥ÁzÀÄ.ºÉZï.J£ï,

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

²PÀët E¯ÁSÉ (¸À«ÄwUÀ¼ÀÄ).

¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ

EªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è

G¥À¹ÜvÀgÀÄ

Dgï.ªÉAPÀmÉñÀ ¥ÀzÀQ ¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ

aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ

r.n.¹.Dgï-127/2012-13, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 27£Éà ¥sɧæªÀj, 2013.

¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ :-

D¥Á¢vÀgÀÄ :-

¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ªÀÄÄRå ¥ÉÃzÉ

CdÓA¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ

«gÀÄzÀÞ

ºÉêÀÄtÚ ©£ï ¹zÀÞ¥Àà,

CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ.

¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-08-2010 gÀAzÀÄ ¨É½UÉÎ 6.00 UÀAmÉ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ªÀÄÄRå ¥ÉÃzÉ, CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ G¥À ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ

PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°èzÁÝUÀ EªÀjUÉ §AzÀ RavÀ ªÀiÁ»w ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ oÁuÉAiÀÄ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¹§âA¢UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀAZÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ oÁuÉ

¸ÀgÀºÀ¢Ý£À CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ ²æÃ ¹zÀÞgÁªÀÄ¥ÀàgÀªÀgÀ UÀÄr¸À°£À ºÀwÛgÀ ºÉÆÃV £ÉÆÃqÀ¯ÁV E§â D¸Á«ÄAiÀÄÄ J¯ï.JA.J¯ï. ¦üæÃqÀªÀiï ªÉÆÃmÁgï

¸ÉÊPÀ¯ï £ÀA.PÉJ:18.PÉ-7950 gÀ°è ©½ §tÚzÀ §mÉÖ aîzÀ°è MAzÀÄ «¹Ì ¨ÁPïì£ÀÄß ElÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ ¤AwzÀÄÝ, D¸Á«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß »rzÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

«¼Á¸À PÉüÀ¯ÁV ºÉêÀÄtÚ ©£ï ¹zÀÞ¥Àà, CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ JAzÀÄ w½¹zÀÄÝ, ¥ÀAZÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄPÀëªÀÄ ¨ÉÊPï£À°èzÀÝ ¨ÁPïì£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÁUÀ gÁd «¹Ì JA§

¯Éç¯ï EgÀĪÀ 180 «Ä°AiÀÄ 48 PÁålðgï ¨Ál°UÀ¼À°è 8,640 °Ãlgï ªÀÄzÀå vÀÄA©zÀÄÝ, ªÀÄzÀåPÉÌ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV EzÉAiÉÄÃ

JAzÀÄ PÉýzÀÝPÉÌ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÀÄ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV EgÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¹zÀÝjAzÀ EzÀÄ CPÀæªÀÄ ªÀÄzÀåªÉAzÀÄ zÀÈqsÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ zÉÆgÉvÀ ªÀÄzÀå ºÁUÀÆ

ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀAZÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄPÀëªÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è C£ÀĸÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¹, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀ±ÀPÉÌ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ oÁuÉUÉ §AzÀÄ

¤ÃrzÀ ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄ, ªÀÄzÀåzÀ ¹Ã¸ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ DgÉÆÃ¦AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ oÁuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÉæöÊA

£ÀA.106/2010, ¢£ÁAPÀ:10-08-2010 gÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁr, ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ªÀiÁ»w ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ºÁUÀÆ

ªÉÄïÁ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸À°è¹, vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɹ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ CAwªÀÄ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ ¸À°è¹zÀÄÝ, WÀ£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀgÀt

ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄUÉÆAqÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ F ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£É ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆArzÀÝ ªÀÄzÀåzÀ

¥ÉÊQ (gÁ¸ÁAiÀĤPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÉ ªÀiÁzÀj ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ) ªÀÄzÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß C§PÁj ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÀqÀÆgÀÄ ªÀ®AiÀÄ EªÀjUÉ

ºÀ¸ÁÛAvÀj¹zÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ “©” JPïìmÁæPïÖ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ:13-11-2012 gÀAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

2.

ªÀ±À¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ªÁºÀ£À ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄzÀåPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ°£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj PÁAiÉÄÝ

1965 gÀ PÀ®A 43(J)AiÀÄ jÃvÁå ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹ ªÁºÀ£À ªÀiË®å zÀÈrüÃPÀgÀt PÉÆÃj ¥ÁæzÉòPÀ ¸ÁjUÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀjUÉ ¥ÀvÀæ

§gÉAiÀįÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°ègÀĪÀ DgÉÆÃ¦ ºÉêÀÄtÚ ©£ï ¹zÀÞ¥Àà 38 ªÀµÀð, FrUÀgÀ d£ÁAUÀ, fgÁAiÀÄÄvÀÄ PÉ®¸À,

CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ, PÀqÀÆgÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ “©” JPïìmÁæPïÖ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ²æÃ PÉ.J¯ï. ¥ÀæPÁ±À ©£ï °AUÀ¥Àà JA.PÉ.PÀ¯ÉèãÀºÀ½î, vÁåUÀgÀPÀmÉÖ CAZÉ,

vÀjÃPÉgÉ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ EªÀjUÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj PÁAiÉÄÝ 1965 gÀ PÀ®A 43(©) ¥ÀæPÁgÀ £ÉÆnøï£ÀÄß £ÉÆAzÁ¬ÄvÀ CAZÉ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ,

F ¥ÉÊQ PÉ.J¯ï. ¥ÀæPÁ±À JA§ÄªÀªÀjUÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31-01-2013 gÀAzÀÄ eÁjAiÀiÁzÀ ¹éÃPÀÈwAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ªÀÄgÀ½

§A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CAvÀAiÉÄà C§PÁj ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ PÀqÀÆgÀÄ ªÀ®AiÀÄ EªÀgÀÆ PÀÆqÁ £ÉÆÃnøï£ÀÄß RÄzÁÝV DgÉÆÃ¦ ºÉêÀÄtÚ EªÀgÀ ªÀÄUÀ£ÁzÀ

926

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

J.Dgï.CtÚAiÀÄå EªÀjUÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀ PÉ.J¯ï. ¥ÀæPÁ±ï EªÀgÀ CPÀÌ£À ªÀÄUÀ Dgï.¥ÀæPÁ±ï JA§ÄªÀªÀjUÉ eÁjUÉÆ½¹ ¹éÃPÀÈw

¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

3.

¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°ègÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀASÉå: PÉJ:18.PÉ-7950 J¯ï.JA.J¯ï ¦üæÃqÀªÀiï ¨ÉÊPïUÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 15-01-2013 gÀAzÀÄ gÀÆ.9,000/-

(MA§vÀÄÛ ¸Á«gÀ gÀÆ¥Á¬ÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ)UÀ¼À ªÀiË®å zÀÈrüÃPÀj¹ ªÉÆÃmÁgï ªÁºÀ£À ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÁæzÉòPÀ ¸ÁjUÉ PÀbÉÃj, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ

ªÀgÀ¢ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

4.

ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ F ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ PÀ®A 43(©) £ÉÆÃnøï£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¹zÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ

¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è C®èzÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtPÉÌ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¥ÀÆgÀPÀªÁV D¥ÁzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C®èUÀ¼ÉAiÀÄ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À

ªÀÄÆ®PÀªÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ ¸ÁPÀëöåUÀ¼À ªÀÄÆ®PÀªÁUÀ° vÁªÀÅ PÀÈvÀåzÀ°è ¨sÁVAiÀiÁV®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F PÀÈvÀåPÉÌ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¸À¯ÁV®èªÉA§ §UÉÎ

¤gÀƦ¸ÀzÉà EgÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä AiÉÆÃUÀåªÉAzÀÄ

¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ C©üAiÉÆÃUÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

5.

ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ zÁR¯ÁV 2 ªÀµÀð 6 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ 16 ¢ªÀ¸À CªÀ¢ü PÀ¼É¢zÀÄÝ, ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÀÈvÀåPÉÌ §¼À¹®è

JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÁPÁëzsÁgÀUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ vÁªÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ vÀªÀÄä £ÁåAiÀĪÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀªÁUÀ°

ºÁdgÁV ¸Á©ÃvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀzÉà EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀjUÉ UÉÆwÛzÀÄÝ F PÀÈvÀå £ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ¯Éà ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ

ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ §UÉÎ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà D¸ÀQÛ vÉÆÃj¸ÀzÉ EgÀĪÀ CA±ÀªÀÅ ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ ¸Á©ÃvÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ C®èzÉà d¥sÁÛVgÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀÅ E¯ÁSÁ

ªÀ±ÀzÀ°èAiÉÄà EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ vÀl¸ÀÜ ¹ÜwAiÀÄ°è ºÁUÉAiÉÄà ©lÖ°è ¥ÀæPÀÈwAiÀÄ ªÉÊ¥ÀjÃvÀåUÀ½UÀ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV ºÁ¼ÁV ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ §gÀĪÀ gÁd¸ÀéPÉÌ zsÀPÉÌ

GAmÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ«gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄAiÀÄ ²ÃWÀæ «¯ÉêÁj zÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ ªÀ±À¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj

PÁAiÉÄÝ 1965 gÀ PÀ®A 43 (¹) CrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ AiÉÆÃUÀåªÉAzÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄ£ÀªÀjPÉAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ

F PɼÀPÀAqÀ DzÉñÀ

“DzÉñÀ”

Dgï.ªÉAPÀmÉÃ±ï ¥ÀzÀQ, ¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ

oÁuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, CdÓA¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ EªÀgÀ PÉæöÊA £ÀA.106/2010, ¢£ÁAPÀ:10-08-2010 gÀ°è ªÀ±À¥Àr¹PÉÆArgÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀASÉå:

PÉJ:18.PÉ-7950 (J¯ï.JA.J¯ï ¦üæÃqÀªÀiï ¨ÉÊPï) ºÁUÀÆ gÁ¸ÁAiÀĤPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÉ ªÀiÁzÀj vÉUÉzÀÄ G½zÀ 8,460 °Ãlgï gÁd«¹Ì ªÀÄzÀåªÀ£ÀÄß

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj PÁAiÉÄÝ 1965 PÀ®A 43(J) CrAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ PÀ®A 43(©) CrAiÀİè C£ÀĸÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ

PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß dgÀÄV PÀ®A 43(¹) CrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆAqÀÄ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.

F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß EAzÀÄ CAzÀgÉ 27£Éà ¥sɧæªÀj 2013 gÀAzÀÄ ¨ÉgÀ¼ÀZÀÄÑUÁgÀjUÉ GRÛ¯ÉÃR£À PÉÆlÄÖ UÀtPÀAiÀÄAvÀæzÀ°è ¨ÉgÀ¼ÀaѹzÀ

£ÀAvÀgÀ vÀ¥ÀÄàUÀ¼À£ÀÄß w¢Ý ªÀÄÄPÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è WÉÆÃ¶¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.

F DzÉñÀªÀÅ EA¢¤AzÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À £ÀAvÀgÀ eÁjAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

P.R. 221

¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ,

aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

wzÀÄÝ¥Àr

¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 13 J¯ïf¹:2013 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 05-03-2013.

DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 13 J¯ïf¹:2013 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:14-02-2012gÀ DzÉñÀ ¨sÁUÀzÀ°è£À µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå

(5)gÀ°è£À µÀgÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ N¢PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.

“¸ËgÀ±ÀQÛ ¥ÁPïðUÁV ¨ÉÃPÁUÀĪÀ vÁAwæPÀvÉ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ºÁUÀÆ G¥ÀPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß GvÁࢸÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÀA¥À¤UÀ¼ÀÄ

ªÀÄÄAzÉ §AzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ PÀA¥À¤UÀ½UÉ ¨ÉÃPÁUÀĪÀ eÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÉÄ|| ¸ÁVlgï ªÉAZÀgïì ¥ÉæöÊ °«ÄmÉqï EªÀgÀÄ G¥ÀUÀÄwÛUÉ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄïÉ

¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÁgÀtPÁÌV UÀÄwÛUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÀ¨sÁgÉ (not to alienate) ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ”

P.R. 222

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

ºÉZï.eÉ.®QëöäãÁgÁAiÀÄt,

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw-3).

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É

¸ÀASÉå: PÀAE 100 J¯ïDgïJA:2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:12-02-2013.

ªÉÄ|| ªÉ¯ï¸ÀÖ£ï ¸ÉÆÃ¯Ágï PÀ£ÀßqÀ ¥ÉæöÊ.°., ªÀÄÄA¨ÉÊ EªÀjUÉ ªÉƼÀPÁ®ÆägÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, PÀ¸À¨Á ºÉÆÃ§½, £ÁUÀ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÀæ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð

£ÀA.315/2gÀ°è 20.00 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ, ¸À.£ÀA.316/1 gÀ°è 40.00 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ, ¸À.£ÀA.316/2 gÀ°è 43.03 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÉƼÀPÁ®ÆägÀÄ

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

927

vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, zÉêÀ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÀæ ºÉÆÃ§½, ºÉÃgÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA.34/3 gÀ°è 2.09 JPÀgÉ/ UÀÄAmÉ MlÄÖ 105.12 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ PÀȶ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß

PÉÊUÁjPÁ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV CAzÀgÉ, ¸ËgÀ «zÀÄåvï WÀlPÀ ¸Áܦ¸ÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1961 gÀ PÀ®A 109(1)

ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ (1974)gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 38-© ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 38-¹ gÀ°è£À µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÆgÉʹzÀÄÝ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ

¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1961gÀ PÀ®A 63, 79J, 79© CxÀªÁ 80PÉÌ «£Á¬Äw ¤Ãr, PÀ®A 109 (1)gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀ µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ½UÉ M¼À¥ÀlÄÖ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ:-

1) AiÀiÁªÀ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß Rjâ¸À®Ä C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉAiÉÆÃ CzÉà GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß JgÀqÀÄ

ªÀµÀðzÉÆ¼ÀUÉ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F PÀÄjvÀAvÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ °TvÀªÁV ªÀiÁ»w

¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

2) F C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀƸÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ (1961)zÀ PÀ®A 109gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ «£Á¬Äw ªÀiÁvÀæªÁVzÀÄÝ, ¨ÉÃgÉ

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁzÀ°è ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄr CUÀvÀå PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

3) F «£Á¬Äw ¥ÀqÉzÀªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà µÉqÀÆå¯ï ¨ÁåAPï CxÀªÁ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ, PÀȶ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæ«ÄÃuÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¨ÁåAPï

MAzÀPÉÌ CxÀªÁ PÀA¥À¤ PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1956gÀ PÀ®A 3 gÀ°è ºÉýgÀĪÀAvÉ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 51 ¥ÉÃAiÀiïØ C¥ï µÉÃgÀÄ §AqÀªÁ¼À ºÉÆA¢zÀ gÁdå

¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¤AiÀÄAwævÀ CxÀªÁ JgÀqÀgÀ »rvÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀAWÀ/¸ÀA¸ÉÜ

MAzÀPÉÌ SÁvÀj ¤Ãr CqÀªÀiÁ£À ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÉ ºÉÆuÉ ªÀiÁr ¸Á® ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹ ¸ÀzÀj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢vÀ

GzÉÝñÀPÀÌ®èzÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ GzÉÝñÀPÉÌ §¼À¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è.

4) ¸ÀzÀj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ªÀåªÀ¸ÁAiÉÄÃvÀgÀ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV ¥ÀjªÀwð¹PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ (1964)zÀ PÀ®A 95gÀ

ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ f¯Áè¢üPÁjAiÀĪÀjAzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

5) G¯ÉèÃTvÀ d«ÄãÀÄUÀ¼À°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÁAiÀÄð PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä d«Ää£À «£Áå¸ÀPÉÌ £ÀUÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á

E¯ÁSÉ/C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ/¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½AzÀ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É

¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

6) D d«ÄãÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà £ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¹.r.¦/M.r.¦. ªÁå¦ÛAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ §AzÀ°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw

¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

7) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1969 gÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀAvÀºÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj d«ÄãÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀݰè

CzÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

8) ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ £ÀqɸÀĪÀ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¨sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

F

ªÉÄð£À

AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ

µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼ÀÄ

G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁzÀ°è

FUÀ

¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ

C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ

jÃvÀå

gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦vÀ ¨sÀÆ«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß IÄtªÀÄÄPÀÛªÁV ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ°è ¤»vÀ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.

P.R. 223

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

©.JA.zÁPÁëAiÀÄtªÀÄä,

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ).

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É

¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 63 J¯ïfªÉÊ 2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-01-2013.

£ÀªÀÄÆ£É-27

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ PÀ®A 68(1) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 94 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ WÉÆÃµÀuÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀévÁÛVgÀĪÀ ºÁUÀÆ PɼÀV£À C£ÀĸÀÆaAiÀÄ°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ ¥Àr¹zÀ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀéwÛ£À ¨sÁUÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ

CUÀvÀå«®èªÉAzÀÄ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

¥ÀæAiÀÄÄPÀÛ FUÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1964gÀ PÀ®A 68£Éà ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ (1)£Éà G¥À¥ÀæPÀgÀt¢AzÀ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ

C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀéwÛ£À ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÁUÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ CUÀvÀå«®èªÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ s¸ÀéwÛ£À ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÁUÀzÀ°è CxÀªÁ CzÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ ºÁUÀÆ J¯Áè ªÀåQÛUÀ¼À ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼ÀÄ PÉÆ£ÉUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ GzÉÝò¹

F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ WÉÆÃ¶¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ºÀQÌ£À eÉÆvÉUÉ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀéwÛ£À ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÁUÀzÀ°è CxÀªÁ CzÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É »vÁ¸ÀQÛAiÀÄļÀî CxÀªÁ ºÀPÀÄ̼Àî CxÀªÁ

F GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ C£ÀåxÁ ¨sÁ¢vÀ£ÁUÀĪÀ/¥ÀæwPÀÆ® ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄPÉÌ M¼ÀUÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ«gÀĪÀ EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà »vÁ¸ÀQÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ

vÉÆA¨sÀvÀÄÛ (90) ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ ¸ÀzÀj GzÉÝñÀzÀ §UÉÎ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CAvÀºÀ »vÁ¸ÀQÛ CxÀªÁ ºÀQÌ£À £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀPÉÌ PÉèêÀÄÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁzÀ

ªÉƧ®UÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ °TvÀ gÀÆ¥ÀzÀ°è w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄÄPÀÛ DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀj

¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è G¥À§A¢ü¹gÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

928

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

C£ÀĸÀÆa

gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ ¨sÁUÀ EvÁå¢ EgÀĪÀ UÁæªÀÄ

ºÉƸÀºÉƼÀ®Ä

vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ

PÉ.Dgï.¥ÉÃmÉ

f¯Éè

ªÀÄAqÀå

PÀmÉÖAiÀÄ ¨sÁUÀzÀ ªÀtð£É

¸ÀPÁðj PÀmÉÖ ¸À.£ÀA.361

gÀ¸ÉÛ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÁzÀÄzÀgÀ ¨sÁUÀ CxÀªÁ ¨sÁUÀzÀ ªÀtð£É

¸À.£ÀA 46 gÀ°è£À 8-00 JPÀgÉ

gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ ¨sÁUÀ CxÀªÁ ¨sÁUÀUÀ¼À ¸Àj¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ «¹ÛÃtð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃgÉ, MlÄÖ 8-00 JPÀgÉ

¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ gÀ¸ÉÛ: ©Ã¢:UÀ°è:zÁj: CxÀªÀ CzÀgÀ ¨sÁUÀ:-

¥ÀƪÀð

¸ÀPÁðj UÉÆÃªÀiÁ¼À

¥À²ÑªÀÄ

PÉÆªÉÄäÃgÀºÀ½î UÀr

GvÀÛgÀ

¸ÀPÁðj UÉÆÃªÀiÁ¼À

zÀQët

PÉÆ¼ÀZÉäÃgÀÄ

±ÀÄ¢ÞÃPÀgÀtPÉÌ

¤ÃrgÀĪÀ

EzÉÃ

£ÀA:

d«ÄãÀÄ, F ªÀÄzsÉå EgÀĪÀ JAlÄ (8-00) JPÀgÉ

¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß WÀ£À vÁådåªÀ¸ÀÄÛ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉUÁV ¤ÃqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

P.R. 224

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

PÉ.²ªÀ°AUÀAiÀÄå,

¦ÃoÁ¢üPÁj,

PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ªÀÄA-2).

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated 20-12-2001 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding

sand over an area of 8.09 Hectares in Kuruvatti village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary

district for a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 20-12-2001 in No.243 AML 2001.

2.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding sand over an area of 8-09 hectares in Kuruvatti village,

Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for a period of 10 years from 23-12-1992 vide ML No.2166. The said lease came to be expired on

22-12-2002. The lessee has made renewal application on 20-12-2001.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that

all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Govind.B.Ron

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the

samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies

No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose.

He further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that

the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to

produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

929

1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability

of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige

Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated

31-03-2011 in revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to

pass a fresh order as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the

technical note on the “Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the

note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said

location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.

Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy

was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the WP

No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

ORDER No.DMG/MLS/243 AML 2001/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 243 AML 2001 dated 20-12-2001 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron

for moulding sand over an area of 8.09 hectares in Kuruvatti village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district.

P.R. 269

DIRECTOR.

930

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated 11-08-2011 of Sri.H.B.Patil for moulding sand

over an area of 80 acres in Kotihal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of

20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 11-08-2011 in No.556 AML 2011.

2.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.H.B.Patil for moulding sand over an area of 80 acres in Kotihal village, Ranebennur

taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years from 14-08-1992 vide ML No.2152. The said lease came to be expired on 13-08-2012.

The lessee has made renewal application on 11-08-2011.

2 The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that

all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.H.B.Patil appeared on

16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the samples

from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies

No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose.

He further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that

the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to

produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR

1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability

of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of 8 sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said

location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.

Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

931

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.

The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation

has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.

District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the

sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the

Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of

Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding

sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

ORDER NO.DMG/MLS/556 AML 11/12-13 DATED 5TH FEBRUARY 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of powers conferred under Government

Notification No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.556 AML 2011 dated 11-08-2011 of

Sri.H.B.Patil for moulding sand over an area of 80.00 acres in Kotihal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district.

P.R. 270

DIRECTOR.

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated 08-11-2006 of Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi for moulding

sand over an area of 12.94 Hectares in Nelawagalu Village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri

district for a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 08-11-2006 in No.1089 AML 2006.

2.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï//2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi for moulding sand over an area of 12.94 hectares in Nelawagalu

village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 20 years from 20-11-1987 vide ML No.2055. The said lease came to be

expired on 19-11-2007. The lessee has made renewal application on 08-11-2006.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that

all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of her case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted her written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected

the samples from the leased area in her absence. She further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the

entire Tungabhadra river sand the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is

stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of

the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of

932

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this

regard and also stated that the Central Government, Department of Mines have classified the minerals as minor and major depending

upon its end use not basically on the chemical analysis and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said

location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.

Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.

The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has

been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District

Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand

mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri

district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41190/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/1089 AML 2006/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 1089 AML 2006 dated 08-11-2006 of

Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi for moulding sand over an area of 12.94 Hectares in Nelawagalu village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district.

P.R. 268

DIRECTOR.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

933

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Premature termination of mining lease bearing No.2218 sanctioned to of Sri.Babulal Khan

Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres in Irani Village of Rannebennur

Taluk, Haveri District for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 30-09-96. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your application dated 13-01-1992 in No.4 AML 92.

2.

This office letter No.DMG/AML4/AML 92/20569, dated 28-02-1996.

3.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

4.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease application was filed by Sri.Allabaksi Bahadur Khan Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres

in Irani Village of Rannebennur Taluk, Haveri District for a period of 20 years on 16-01-92. As per Sri.Babulal Mahadi’s representation

dated 12-05-95 submitted the death certificate of Sri.Allabaksh Mahadi and requested to consider him as legal heir.

By this office letter dated 28-02-1996 cited under ref (2) Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi is considered as legal heir of Late Allabaksh

Bahadur Khan Mahadi under the provisions of Rule 25A of MCR 1960.

A mining lease was executed in favour of Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres in Irani

Village of Rannebennur Taluk, Haveri District on 30-09-96 for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 30-09-96 vide ML No.2218.

2. Sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral technologist of this office. The analysis proved

that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1

specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay. Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be

classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that

all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. A notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation

of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written

arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the samples from the leased area in his absence. He

further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri

and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand

available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of the Department

conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay,

hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this regard and also stated

that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR 1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to

mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige

Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the

934

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

said location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres

only. Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for

foundry application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate

grant of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy

was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the WP

No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/4 AML 92/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore do hereby recommend the Government for premature

termination of mining lease bearing No.2218 sanctioned to Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres in

Irani village of Rannebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 30-09-96 under section 4A of MM (D & R) Act 1957.

P.R. 267

DIRECTOR.

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated 11-05-1998 of Sri.Anjanappa Hanumappa

Gadad for moulding sand over an area of 20.23 hectares in Pathepura and Kusugatti

villages, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 11-05-1998 in No.31 AML 1998.

2.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Anjanappa Hanumappa Gaddad for moulding sand over an area of 20.23 hectares in

Pathepura and Kusagatti villages, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 18-05-1989 vide ML No.2088.

The said lease period came to be expired on 17-05-1999. Further the lessee has made application on 11-05-1998 seeking renewal

of ML No.2088.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that

all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri. Anjanappa

Hanumappa Gadad appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written statements, wherein it is stated that the lease is in operation

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

935

till today. The said lease was granted after verification of sand sample which is approved by Government of India, Indian Bureau of

Mines and he has fulfilled and complied all the terms and conditions as imposed on him and the sand deposit in Tungabhadra river bed

varies every year. He further stated that the moulding sand deposited in river bed is used for industries purpose only. The authorities

under the Act, have stopped issue of permit to transport of the moulding sand. Hence it has resulted in illegal mining and loss to the

State Exchequer. He further stated that the authorities have no power to terminate the lease for the reasons stated in the notice and

requested to drop the proceedings.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

8. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said

location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.

Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy

was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/31 AML 1998/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 31 AML 1998 dated 11-05-1998 of Sri. Anjanappa

Hanumappa Gadad.

P.R. 271

DIRECTOR.

936

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 14-07-2004 of Smt.Channamma, Legal heir of

H.G.Katenahalli for moulding sand over an area of 115.00 acres in Haranagiri village,

Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 14-07-2004 in No. 372 AML 04.

2.

This office letter No.DMG/MLS/ML-1982/08-09/ 2331-32, dated 25-08-2008.

3.

This office notice No.DMG/MLS/372 AML 04/RML 1982/2008-09/1034, dated: 05-05-2009.

4.

Deputy Commissioner, Haveri letter No.Bhoomi/ Vahi/31/09-10, dated : 02-07-09.

5.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.

6.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.

1.

A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.H.G.Katenahalli for moulding sand over an area of 115 acres Haranagiri village,

Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years from 30-07-1985 vide ML No.1982. The said lease came to be expired on

29-07-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 14-07-2004.

2.

The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3.

The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that

all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4.

A per this officer letter cited under ref (2) Smt.Channamma W/o Late H.G.Katenahalli is considered as legal representative

as per rule 25A(1) of MCR 1960 with regard to renewal application.

5.

A notice was issued under rule 26(1) of MCR 1960 to the applicant cited under ref (3) to submit a statutory clearance of

IBM approved mining plan, MoEF clearance, KSPCB consent, arrears clearance certificate from Senior Geologist and informed to pay

arrears of royalty Rs.1,49,151/- within 30 days failing which action will be initiated to cancel the renewal application.

6.

The Deputy Commissioner, Haveri in his report cited under ref (4) submitted revenue report recommending to renew the

mining lease of 1982.

7.

The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of her case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Smt.Channamma

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted her written arguments, requesting to renew the mining lease in her favour because she has

paid all arrears and dead rent and she has prayed that her husband was obtained mining lease and her husband expired due to heart

attack and she has two handicapped sons and she is illiterate. This is the only income for their livelihood and prayed to renew the

mining lease.

8.

Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad districts was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

9.

As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

Taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code

guidelines and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical

test following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

937

10.

Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said

location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.

Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

11.

ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

12.

Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.

The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation

has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.

District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the

sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the

Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of

Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding

sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/372 AML 04/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI 3

MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.372 AML 04 (RML 1982) dated 14-07-2004 of

Smt.Channamma, legal heir of Late H.G.Katenahalli for moulding sand over an area of 115.00 acres in Haranagiri village, Ranebennur

taluk, Haveri district.

P.R. 272

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding

sand over an area of 5.26 Hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for

a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 27-09-2004 in No.946 AML 04.

2.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding sand over an area of 5.26 hectares in Mylar village,

Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for a period of 10 years from 15-09-1995 vide ML No.2200. The said lease came to be expired on

14-09-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 27-09-2004.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

938

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Govind.B.Ron

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the

samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies

No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose.

He further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that

the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to

produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR

1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability

of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige

Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated: 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River

Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location

put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further

according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their

analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.

In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was

incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T. to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/946 AML 04/12-13 , Dated : 5th February 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

939

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.946 AML 04 dated 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for

moulding sand over an area of 5.26 hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district.

P.R. 273

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 04-09-2001 of Sri.Honnappa Hanumappa

Kudrihal for moulding sand over an area of 4.05 Hectares in Kancharaghatta village,

Haveri taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years. – reg.

Read : 1.

Your renewal application dated 04-09-2001 in No. 170 AML 01.

2.

This office notification no.DMG.MLS/RML 2156/ 06-07/1388-94, dated 05-05-2007.

3.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

4.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated: 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri. Honnappa Hanumappa Kudrihal for moulding sand over an area of 4-05 hectares in

Kancharaghatta Village, Haveri taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 23-09-1992 vide ML No.2156. The said lease came

to be expired on 22-09-2002. The lessee has made renewal application on 04-09-2001 for a further period of 10 years.

2. The said application was referred to the Deputy Commissioner, Haveri for opinion. The Deputy Commissioner, Haveri in his

letter dated 08-11-2002 has stated that the area applied is not reserved for any public purpose and recommended for extraction of

moulding sand. The Joint Director, Bellary in his letter dated 22-07-2003 has sent the spot inspection report, wherein its is sated that in

the applied area, ordinary sand available from 1 to 2 feet and availability of moulding sand is not confirmed and sand samples has to be

analysed. The applicant has not submitted any of the document regarding supply of moulding sand to the foundries.

3. The Senior Geologist, Dharwad has sent technical report wherein he has stated that the sand exploited and consumed for

constructional work in the nearby cities and towns and recommended for rejection. The applicant has preferred

WP No.42002/2003 in the High Court of Karnataka. The Hon’ble High Court in its order dated 21-02-2007 was pleased to dispose of

this writ petition. The operative portion of the order is as follows:

“The respondent authority is directed to consider the application of the petitioner for renewal, if such

application is pending consideration on the basis of the report submitted by the Joint Director and to dispose of

the same within three months from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with law.”

4. Further notification issued in No.DMG/MLS/RML/2156/06-07/1388-94, dated 05-05-2007 renewing the lease for a period of

10 years w.e.f. 23-09-2002 over an area of 10.00 acres in Kancharaghatta village, Haveri taluk, Dharwad district for moulding sand.

But lease deed has not executed within the stipulated time as required under Rule 31 of MC Rules 1960.

5. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

6. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

7. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Inspite of receiving the

hearing notice, the applicant remained absent. Hence, the matter was decided based on the material available on records.

8. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

9. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

940

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

10. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra

River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said

location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.

Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant

of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

11. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

12. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.

The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation

has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.

District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the

sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the

Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of

Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding

sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/170 AML 01/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby revoke the notification No.DMG/MLS/RML/2156/06-07/ 1388-94, dated : 05-05-2007

issued in favour of Sri.H.H.Kudrihal for moulding sand over an area of 10.00 acres in Kancharaghatta village, Haveri taluk, Haveri district

for a period of 10 years w.e.f. 23-09-2002 as per Rule 31 of MC Rules 1960.

P.R. 274

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 17-08-2001 of Sri.Amanulla Khan for

moulding sand over an area of 4.05 Hectares in Kodiyal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri

district for a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 17-08-2001 in No.152 AML 2001.

2.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Amanulla Khan for moulding sand over an area of 4.05 hectares in Kodiyal village,

Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 01-10-1992 vide ML No.2157. The said lease came to be expired on

30-09-2002. The lessee has made renewal application on 17-08-2001.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

941

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Amanulla Khan

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the

samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies

No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He

further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the

sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to

produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR

1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability

of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River

Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location

put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further

according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for

foundry application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate

grant of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their

analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.

In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was

incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

942

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/152 AML 2001/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013.

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 152 AML 2001dated 17-08-2001 of Sri.Amanulla Khan

for moulding sand over an area of 4.05 hectares in Kodiyal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district.

P.R. 275

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding

sand over an area of 6.01 Hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for

a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 27-09-2004 in No.948 AML 04.

2.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding sand over an area of 6.01 hectares in Mylar village,

Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for a period of 10 years from 15-09-1995 vide ML No.2199. The said lease came to be expired on

14-09-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 27-09-2004.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Govind.B.Ron

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the

samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies

No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He

further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the

sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to

produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR

1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability

of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige

Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

943

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River

Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location

put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further

according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for ordinary

sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their

analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.

In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was

incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T. to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/948 AML 04/12-13, Dated : 4th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification

No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.948 AML 04 dated : 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron

for moulding sand over an area of 6.01 Hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district.

P.R. 278

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 19-01-2011 of Sri.B.Jagadish for moulding sand

over an area of 18.61 hectares in Rajanahalli village, Harihara taluk, Chitradurga district for a

period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 19-01-2011 in No.87 AML 2011.

2.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.

3.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.

1. Originally a mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.B.Revanna Siddappa for moulding sand over an area of 32.38 hectares in

Rajanahalli village, Harihara taluk, Chitradurga district for a period of 10 years from 20-01-1982 vide ML No.1803. Further first renewal

of the lease granted on 14-10-97 for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 20-01-92 over an area of 18.61 hectares vide ML No.2231. The lessee

i.e., Sri.B.Revanna Siddappa demised on 15-05-2010. The lease came to be expired on 19-01-2012. Further Sri.B.Jagadish stated to

be the legal heir of the deceased lessee has made second renewal application on 19-01-2011.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

944

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.B.Jagadish appeared

on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the samples

from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is stated

that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of the

Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2)

and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this regard and

also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR 1960 and having permitted the lessee

all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability of moulding sand in Tungabhadra

river bed.

5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River

Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location

put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further

according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of

lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.

The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation

has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.

District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the

sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the

Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of

Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding

sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

945

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/87 AML 2011/12-13, Dated : 4th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI

3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.87 AML 2011 dated : 19-01-2011 of Sri.B. Jagadish for

moulding sand over an area of 18.61 hectares in Rajanahalli village, Harihara taluk, Chitradurga district.

P.R. 279

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration of renewal application dated : 25-11-2004 of Sri.D.Yamunappa for moulding sand

over an area of 12.15 hectares in Sarathi village, Harihara taluk, Davanagere district for a period

of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 25-11-2004 in No.1358 AML 04

2.

This office notification No.DMG/MLS/1358 AML 04/ RML-2207/08-09/281-287, dated 16-04-2009.

3.

The Senior Geologist, Davanagere in his letter No. SG(M)/DMG/Sand Mining/ 10-11/1659,

dated 13-08-2010.

4.

This office letter No.DMG/1358 AML 04//RML 2207/10-11/9886, dated 05-01-2011.

5.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.

6.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.D.Yamunappa for moulding sand over an area of 12.05 hectares in Sarathi Village,

Harihara Taluk, Davanagere District for a period of 10 years from 07-12-1995 vide ML No.2207. The said lease came to be expired on

06-12-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 25-11-2004. A grant notification dated 16-04-2009 cited under ref (2)

sanctioning renewal of mining lease for moulding sand over an area of 30 acres in Tungabhadra river bed of Sarathi village,

Harihara taluk, Davanagere district for a period of 20 year w.e.f. 07-12-2005.

2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. A Chemical analysis of the sand sample was carriedout in this office laboratory and the analysis report

reads as follows:

ML No.

SiO2%

% Clay Content

% of Recovery

Remarks

2207

86.48

0.72

48.11

Ordinary sand

The Senior Geologist, Davanagere in their letter cited under ref (3) has opined the available sand in the leased area is ordinary

sand instead of moulding sand. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5%. The IS specification for natural

moulding sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

3. Based on the chemical analysis report a notice cited under ref (4) was issued under rule 26(1) of MCR 1960 calling the

applicant why the renewal application should not be rejected based on the chemical analysis report and non payment of EPF and also

informed to submit written statement within 30 days.

4. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

5. The matter of renewal was pending for long time and hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear

before this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.D.Yamunappa

was present during the course of hearing and submitted his written arguments. He has stated that the available mineral in the leased

area is moulding sand and quoted the provisions of Rule 70 of mineral concession rules 1960. He further stated that the major mineral

can be used as minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of Mineral Concession Rules 1960 and IBM has approved the mining plan for moulding

sand and requested to execute the renewal mining lease deed in his favour.

6. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

946

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

7. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

8. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River

Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location

put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres. Further

according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. At any rate grant/renewal/continuation of lease for moulding sand to any extent is likely to overlap or interfere with the area

of quarrying lease for ordinary sand.

9. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

10. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and

their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole

issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The

policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has

been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District

Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand

mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri

district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- per M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines

and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- per M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- per M.T. Also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable

rates to the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast

ordinary sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the WP

No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/1358 AML 04/12-13. Dated : 12th March 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI

3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby revoke the grant notification No.DMG/MLS/1358 AML 04/RML-2207/08-09/281-287, dated 16-

04-2009 of Sri.D.Yamunappa for moulding sand over an area of 12.15 hectares in Sarathi village, Harihara taluk, Davanagere district for

a period of 20 years w.e.f. 07-12-2005 as per Rule 31 of MC Rules 1960.

P.R. 280

DIRECTOR

PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE

Sub:

Consideration

of

renewal

application

dated:

09-04-1999

of

Sri.

Halanagouda

Channanagouda Channagoudar for moulding sand over an area of 8.49 Hectares in Irani

village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 20 years. – reg.

Read: 1.

Your renewal application dated 09-04-1999 in No.67 AML 99.

2.

This office notification no.DMG.MLS/RML 2156/ 06-07/1388-94, dated 05-05-2007.

3.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.

4.

This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/ 2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.

1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri. Halanagouda Channanagouda Channagoudar for moulding sand over an area of

8.49 hectares in Irani village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 21-04-1990 vide ML No.2108A. The said

lease came to be expired on 20-04-2000. The lessee has made renewal application on 09-04-1999 for a further period of 20 years.

¨sÁUÀ 3

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

947

2. The Senior Geologist, Haveri in his letter No.GaBhuE/HiBhuVi/Maralu/ 2009-10/968, dated 25-02-2010 has sent the list of

sand sample chemical analysis. As per analysis report:

SiO2%

Al2O3%

Fe2O3%

TiO2%

% Clay Content

% Recovery

87.91

7.71

3.19

0.10

0.20

60.71

Sri.N.B.Manjunath in his letter dated 23-11-2010 while enclosing the copy of the death certificate and will executed by

Sri.Halanagouda Channanagouda Channagoudar stating that he is the foster daughter’s son and during the life time Sri. Halanagouda

Channanagouda Channagoudar has executed a will on 05-06-2009 and his grand father demised on 14-04-2010 and requested to

consider him as legal representative as per Rule 25 of MC Rules 1960.

3. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral

technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding

sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.

Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.

4. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all

the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for

general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of

resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,

specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.

5. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before

this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.N.B.Manjunath

appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the

samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire

Tungabhadra river sand the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is stated

that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of the

Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2)

and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this regard

and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR 1960 and having permitted the lessee

all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability of moulding sand in Tungabhadra

river bed.

6. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige

village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected

revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in

revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil

Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order

as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the

“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:

7. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,

Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur

taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines

and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural

Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test

following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,

Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the

procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code

(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines

laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian

Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)

8. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River

Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location

put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further

according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry

application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant

948

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013

¨sÁUÀ 3

of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for

ordinary sand.

9. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand

deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,

Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the

existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,

almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.

10. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their

analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.

In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was

incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been

included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand

Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining

and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district

the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and

Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand

wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the

Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to

the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary

sand deposits only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.

11. Sri.N.B.Manjunath vide letter dated 27-04-2012 enclosed consent letter of Sri.Chandrappa Halanagouda Channagoudar for

transfer of ML in favour of Sri.N.B.Manjunath. But in the geniological tree/pedigree produced by the applicant not revealed the name of

Sri.N.B.Manjunath.

In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the

WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:

Order No.DMG/MLS/67 AML 99/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013

I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI 3

MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby rejected the renewal application No.67 AML 99, dated 09-04-1999 of Sri. Halanagouda

Channanagouda Channagoudar for moulding sand over an area of 8.49 hectares in Irani village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for

a period of 20 years.

P.R. 276

DIRECTOR

¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, WÀlPÀ-2, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ