(909)
RNI No. KARBIL/2001/47147
¨sÁUÀ 3
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DAiÀiÁ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
IN THE COURT OF COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION BIDAR
No. LOB/WCA/Cr-No. 02/013, Dated: 08/01/013
Applicants :
V/s
Respondents:
1) Smt. Reshma W/o Late Nabisab
Age: 24 years occ: Household
R/o Village Jambagi Tq Aurad
Dist Bidar & two others
1) Shaik Moiz Proprietor of Samreen Trans,
H.No. 23-2-164 Moghalpura, Opposite Nayab function plaza Lane, Hyd-500064.
2) M/s. Bajaj Allianz Gen-Ins, Com.Ltd., WIE Plaza, Airport Road, Yerwad, Pune,
With its Policy and servicing office at PNR/SSV, Complex 304, Plot No, A-13,
Rukminipuram, A.S. Road nagar Hyd- Represented by its authorised officer.
PROCLAMATION
Smt. Reshma W/o. Late Nabisab R/o. Jambgi Tq, Aurad, have/has filed Application in this court claiming compensation
stating that Late. Nabisab was working as Driver under Respondent No.01 he met with an accident arising out of and during the course
of employment as a result he died on, 21/3/2012.
Wherefore, it is hereby notified for the information of these concerned that other dependents if any may file their claim
application and objections within 30 days from the date of publication of this proclamation, if no applications on objections are received
within the specified date the court will proceeded further in the matter.
P.R. 167
SC-10
Commissioner for Workmen’s
Compensation, Bidar
IN THE COURT OF 2ND FTC COURT, BANGALORE CITY
It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as
unclaimed and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put
their claim one month from the date of this publication.
Bangalore City
2ND FTC Bangalore city.
List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.
SL. No.
CR.No & P.F.No
VEHICLE & REG No
ENGINE.NO
CHASSIS NO
01
85/2003
P.F.NO 32/2003
YAMAHA RX-100
KA-02-Q-7851
1L5075937
97AIL5075937
Bangalore City
P.R. 164
SC - 5
2ND FTC,
Bangalore City
¸ÀA¥ÀÄl 148
Volume 148
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 9, 2013 (ªÉʱÁR 19, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1935)
Bangalore, Thursday, May 9, 2013 (Vaishakha 19, Shaka Varsha 1935)
¸ÀAaPÉ 19
Issue 19
910
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE 6TH ADITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE CITY.
It hereby notified to the public that the Adugodi Police station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as unclaimed
and such vehicles are lying in the police Station as unclaimed so far, I Hence the Owner of Properties {vehicles} may put their claim one
month from the date of publication.
Bangalore City
Dated : 05-02-2013
6th A C M Magistrate,
Bangalore City.
List of the seized vehicles are lying in the Adugodi Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under C.miss
SL
No.
C.MIS
No.
VEHICLE NAME
AND No.
COLOR
ENGINE
No.
CHASSIS No.
1
53/2010
T.V.S. VICTOR KA03 EU7698
BLACK
OFIB51492835
MD625AF1152P72253-
2
54/2010
SUZUKI SUMARAI NIL
BLACK
7712M979457
7712F932740
3
469/11
HERO HONDA SPLENDOR
TN-07, AA-6337
BLACK
03F20C49489
--
4
11/12
YAMAHA 135 KA-03H-2593
BLACK
160316902
5
12/12
KAVASAKI BAJAJ KA-22J-3444
BLACK
36M95B17448
80F95B14221
6
13/12
SUZUKI SAMURAI KA-03R-6684
BLACK
7604M677158
7604F632610
7
14/12
YAMAHA GRU-1796
BLACK
ILIG45003
1046030
8
15/12
SUZUKI MAX- CKL-4655
BLACK
3607M081724
3607F75580
9
16/12
HONDA MARVEL KA-15E-7836
BLACK
015312KIEDJ
KIFDJ0177
10
17/12
TVS MOPED CAO-9334
GREEN
148010272068101
11
18/12
TVS XL heavy duty KA-04EC-68
GREEN
P1202M539271
P302F547710
12
19/12
BAJAJ CHETAK CAX-3591
GREY
05E347818
05C317752
13
20/12
KAVASAKI BAJAJ KL-03, B-2866
BLACK
51M95151647
31F95L48844
14
23/12
HONDACTIVA KA-05EH-5814
BLACK
NIEUA255981
NIFVA252940
15
24/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-01E-2377
GREY
E06DA321938
--
16
25/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-05Q-1669
LIGHT GREEN
60F94J12185
94J12185
17
36/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-05E-3366
GREEN
06E1125201
06C108873
18
39/12
BAJAJ CHETAK CKS-3485
GREY
06E953475
--
19
-do-
YAMAHA RX KA-03EA-1219
BLACK
4T0522681
04T522681
20
40/12
SUZUKI SAMURAI CAQ-9627
WHITE
3412M631816
BE11A05642
21
-do-
YAMAHA MP-20M-2939
RED
1L1511017
95DIL511147
22
42/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-22J-6688
GREY
05695165890
23
-do-
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-02, R-8325
GREY
9366110
899708
24
44/12
SUJUKI SAMURAI KA-19L-2504
BLACK
7008M773939
008F721663
25
Cimis
No.45/12
TVS XL KA-05, EN-6137
GREEN
P3306F78875
P1306M785090
26
47/12
KENETIC HONDA KA-03R-5552
BLACK
619291NIEMH
NIFMLI656007
27
48/12
BAJAJ PULSER KA-03EM-782
RED
DHGBKK80429
DHVBAK80706
28
49/12
SUZUKI SHOGUN KA-05Q-5801
BLACK
8504M545101
803045502037
29
50/12
BAJAJ PULSER KA-01EB-1524
SILVER
DHGBML09365
MD2DDHDH22MC
30
51/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-01 H-4113
BULE
MO6DC189797
F06DC130696
31
52/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-05 EF-3885
BLUE
CDEBGH0951
06CBGH36751
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
911
SL
No.
C.MIS
No.
VEHICLE NAME
AND No.
COLOR
ENGINE
No.
CHASSIS No.
32
54/12
HERO HONDA PASSION
AP-28 L-8344
BLACK
04GO8M56722
04GD9C5579
33
55/12
KINETIC HONDA KA-05J-1236
WHITE
293416NIEHG
34
56/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-01L-3098
BLUE
35M96J83676
35
57/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-02 E-474
GREEN
W06B113456
W0601138569
36
58/12
KINETIC HONDA KA-05, S-2052
BLUE
NIEMH665728
37
60/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-03, J-2811
GREY
M060C230112
F06DE235880
38
61/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-04 J-495
GREY
M06DE218983
F06E235451
39
65/12
BAJAJ CHETAK KA-04 X-8587
GREEN
CDPBGB48489
D6BBGB53143
40
66/12
TVS XL KA-05 EY-851
GREEN
0D1P41295285
MD621BDE154183
41
71/12
TVS SCOOTY KA-05 X-3298
GREEN
K98CM174240
42
-do-
KINETIC HONDA KA-05 EA-84
BLACK
153438NIETA
43
72/12
KINETIC HONDA CKJ-4488
SILVER
715088NIEML
44
3/12
TVS SCOOTY KA-01 R 1265
RED
KA99EM29199
45
-do-
TVS SCOOTY KA-01 S-9137
GREEN
KO1LMC49588
46
88/12
TVS WEGO KL-07BQ-6492
BLACK
0G4BB1110361
47
89/12
TVS SCOOTY KA-04 ER-1535
RED
063H62191424
48
104/12
BAJAJ CT 100 KA-03 EQ 4430
BLACK
DUM6LH49128
DUFDLH663863
49
116/12
BAJAJ PULSAR KA-03 EG- 2571
BLUE
JCGBIH27384
MD2DHJCZZTCH27405
50
118/2012
BAJAJ C.T.100 NIL
BLACK
DHGBMF95377
DSII,F 82163
51
119/2012
HERO HONDA KA-04J7976
BLACK
93E10510560
-
52
120/12012
YAMAHA ENTICER KA-02EF 5675
BLACK
SUSOO5123
02HSUS005128
53
121/2012
YAMAH CK09323
BLACK
BLACK
ID1049445
ILI049445
P.R. 149
SC-5
6th A C M Magistrate,
Bangalore.
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
(KARNATAKA), BANGALORE-CLARIFICATION UNDER SECTION 59(4) OF
THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003.
Sub:
KVAT Act, 2003- Clarification under Section 59(4) regarding the rate of tax
applicable on ‘Flour Milling Pulveriser’-reg.
Ref :
Application dated: 20-10-2012 of Sri Shaji K.N., Proprietor, M/s. Lakshmi
Machineries, Bangalore. (TIN 29330739601)
In the application cited above of Sri Shaji K.N., Proprietor, M/s. Lakshmi Machineries, No.846/2, SRS Bus Stop, Tumkur
Road, Peenya 1st Stage, Bangalore-560058 has sought clarification regarding the rate of tax application on ‘Flour Milling Pulveriser’.
2. Section 59(4) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 empowers the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to clarify the
rate of tax payable under the Act, if he considers it necessary or expedient so to do, for the purpose of maintaining uniformity in the work
of assessments and collection of revenue. It is examined and found that the clarification requested by the petitioner is within the scope
of the aforesaid provision and it is necessary that the clarification be issued for the purpose of maintaining uniformity in the work of
assessments and collection of revenue.
3. Hence the following clarification is issued.
912
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
CLARIFICATION NO.CLR.CR.141/12-13, DATED: 23-01-2013
It is clarified that ‘Flour Milling Pulveriser’ is liable to tax at 14.5% from 01-08-2012 under Section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Karnataka
Value Added Tax Act,2003.
P.R. 150
SC-100
YOGENDRA TRIPATHI
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka), Bangalore
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
(KARNATAKA), BANGALORE-CLARIFICATION UNDER SECTION 12 (7)
OF THE KARNATAKA TAX ON ENTRY OF GOODS ACT, 1979
Sub :
KTEG Act, 1979 – clarification of rate of tax on unmanufactured tobacco – reg.
Ref :
Application dated: 28-09-2012 of Sri Vittal A.Nayak, Proprietor of M/s
Mahadevi Enterprises, Udupi- TIN 29280748989.
In the application cited above, Sri Vittal A.Nayak, proprietor of M/S Mahadevi Enterprises, Mythri Complex, Udupi- 576 101
has sought clarification regarding the rate of entry tax on unmanufactured tobacco.
2. Section 12(7) of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 empowers the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to
clarify the rate of tax payable under the Act, if he considers it necessary or expendient so to do, for the purpose of maintaining uniformity
in the work assessments and collection of revenue. It is examined and found that the clarification requested by the petitioner is within
the scope of the aforesaid provision and it is necessary that the clarification be issued for the purpose of maintaining uniformity in the
work of assessments and collection of revenue.
3. Hence, the following clarification is issued.
CLARIFICATION NO. KTEG/CLR/CR-12/2012-13, DATED: 02-02-2013
It is clarified that ‘unmanufactured tobacco’ in sachets is liable to entry tax at 2% with effect from 01-04-2010 in terms of
Notification No.FD 86 CSL 10, dated: 31-03-2010.
P.R. 151
SC-100
YOGENDRA TRIPATHI
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka), Bangalore
eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. 1£Éà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå: 01/2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08.02.2013.
¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥ÀæZÀgÀ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ, eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. 1£Éà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉ E°è «¯ÉêÁjAiÀiÁzÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è d¦Û ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ F PɼÀPÁt¹zÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ E®èzÉà ºÁUÉà EzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀÅUÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ
AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè F ¥ÀæPÀluÉ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ MAzÀÄ wAUÀ¼À M¼ÀUÁV ¸ÀÆPÀÛ zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹ ªÀ±ÀPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÀÄzÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É AiÀiÁgÀÄ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¨ÁgÀzÉà ºÉÆÃzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀj ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå
ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ¸ÀASÉå
¦.Dgï. £ÀA§gÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¦.J¥sï. ¸ÀASÉå, ¢£ÁAPÀ
£ÉÆÃAzÀt ¸ÀASÉå
EAf£ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ZÁ¹¸ï ¸ÀASÉå
1
¹.¹. ¸ÀASÉå: 993/2008 UÀÄ£Éß
¸ÀASÉå: 52/2008 UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ
¥Éưøï oÁuÉ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.
PÀ®A. 279, 337 C¥sï L¦¹.
¦.Dgï. 97/2008,
¦.J¥sï.¸ÀASÉå: 32/2008
¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.04.2008.
PÉJ-17-eÉ-4538 £ÉÃ
§eÁeï ZÉÃvÀPï ¸ÀÆÌlgï
--
2
¹.¹. ¸ÀASÉå: 886/2008
UÀÄ£Éß ¸ÀASÉå: 80/2007
«zÁå£ÀUÀgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ,
zÁªÀtUÉgÉ. PÀ®A. 98 PÉ.¦. DPïÖ.
¦.Dgï. 14/2009,
¦.J¥sï.¸ÀASÉå: 32/2007
¢£ÁAPÀ: 06.08.2007.
(2) MAzÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà §tÚzÀ
»gÉÆÃ ºÉÆAqÁ ¸ÉàAqÀgï
ªÉÆÃmÁgï ¸ÉÊPÀ¯ï
£ÀA§gï ¥ÉèÃmï E®è.
(3) MAzÀÄ PÀ¥ÀÄà §tÚzÀ
»gÉÆÃ ºÉÆAqÁ ¹r-
100 J¸ï.J¸ï. JAzÀÄ
EzÀÄÝ PÉ-05-J¯ï-4727.
(1) EAf£ï £ÀA§gï ZÁ¹
£ÀA§gï C½¹zÀAvÉ PÀAqÀÄ
§gÀÄwÛzÉ.
(2) EAf£ï ¸ÀASÉå:
94-F-10E-06874,
ZÁ¹ ¸ÀASÉå: 94-F-12F-04586.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
913
3
¹.¹. ¸ÀASÉå: 414/2007
UÀÄ£Éß ¸ÀASÉå: 128/2006
UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ,
zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.
PÀ®A. 465 D¥sï L.¦.¹.
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ®A. 98 PÉ.¦. DPïÖ.
¦.Dgï. 117/2008,
¦.J¥sï.¸ÀASÉå: 40/2006
¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.06.2006.
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¦.J¥sï. ¸ÀASÉå: 41/2006
¢£ÁAPÀ: 28.06.2006.
PÉJ-17-J¯ï-346£ÉÃ
¸ÀÄdÄQ
¸ÀªÀÄÄgÁAiÀiï
ªÉÆÃmÁgï ¨ÉÊPï.
PÉJ-16-PÉ-8529
£ÉÃ
n«J¸ï
«PÀÖgï
ªÉÆÃmÁgï ¨ÉÊPï.
ZÁ¹ £ÀA§gï PÀAqÀħgÀĪÀÅ¢®è,
EAf£ï ¸ÀASÉå: 7704M840322,
EAf£ï ¸ÀASÉå: N3204,
M078068, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
ZÁ¹ ¸ÀASÉå: N3204, F-077710.
P.R. 153
SC-5
eÉ.JA.J¥sï.¹. 1£Éà £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,
zÁªÀtUÉgÉ.
¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉ
¥Éưøï PÀ«ÄõÀ£ÀgïgÀªÀgÀ PÀbÉÃj,
£ÀA.1, E£ï ¥ÉAnæ gÀ¸ÉÛ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ.
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå. 02/C¸ÀÆ/C¹¦/¸ÀA«/2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11-02-2013
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ PÀ§â£ï ¥ÁPïð ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÁ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛªÀÅ ºÀÈzÀAiÀĨsÁUÀzÀ°èzÀÄÝ £ÀUÀgÀ £Á£Á ¨sÁUÀUÀ½UÉ
¸ÀA¥ÀPÀð PÀ°à¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR ªÀÈvÀÛªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ªÀÈvÀÛªÀÅ ¢£ÀzÀ 24 UÀAmÉAiÀÄÆ C¢üPÀ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀAZÁgÀ MvÀÛqÀ¢AzÀ PÀÆrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ
»vÁzÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀÄUÀªÀĪÁV ¥ÁzÀZÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ¸ÁUÀ®Ä F ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ°è £ÀÆvÀ£ÀªÁV ¸ÀéAiÀÄAZÁ°vÀ ¹UÀß¯ï ¢Ã¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
C¼ÀªÀr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ°è ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ E£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ£À jÃwAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀÄUÀªÀĪÁV ¸ÁUÀ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀĪÀAvÉ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛ¢AzÀ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï
¯Éʧæj dAPÀë£ï ªÀgÉUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ eÁjAiÀİègÀĪÀ ¢éªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹ KPÀ ªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÁjUÉ vÀgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ
CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
EzÀ®èzÉ, PÀ§â£ï¥ÁPïð M¼À¨sÁUÀzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ°è ¹zÀݰAUÀAiÀÄå ªÀÈvÀÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÀqÀì£ï ªÀÈvÀÛ¢AzÀ §AzÀAvÀºÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀgÁåAiÀÄ
ªÀiÁUÀðªÁV PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ºÉÆÃUÀ®Ä C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ qÁ: ©.Dgï. CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ ªÀgÉUÉ
gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ JgÀqÀÆ §¢UÀ¼À°è ªÁºÀ£À ¤®ÄUÀqÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤µÉâü¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
DzÀÝjAzÀ PÀ®A 115 ªÉÆÃmÁgï ªÁºÀ£À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1988 ºÁUÀÆ PÀ®A 3 mÁæ¦üPï PÀAmÉÆæÃ¯ï DPïÖ 1960gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ £À£ÀUÉ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ
C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ ©.f. eÉÆåÃw¥ÀæPÁ±ï «Äfð, L¦J¸ï. ¥Éưøï PÀ«ÄõÀ£Àgï, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ§â£ï ¥ÁPïð
¸ÀAZÁgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÁ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀİè KPÀªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£À ¤®ÄUÀqÉ ¤µÉÃzsÀ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ
ªÀiÁ¥ÁðqÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr eÁjUÉ vÀgÀ®Ä DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
1.
±ÉõÁ¢æ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ PÀqÉUÉ EgÀĪÀ ¢éªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀİè
PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛ¢AzÀ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ïªÀgÉUÉ ¥À²ÑªÀÄ¢AzÀ ¥ÀƪÀðzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ¸ÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀAZÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß
AiÀÄxÁ¹ÜwAiÀİè G½¹PÉÆAqÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¢QÌ£À ¸ÀAZÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß CAzÀgÉ ¥ÀƪÀð¢AzÀ ¥À²ÑªÀÄzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï
¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛzÀ PÀqÉUÉ ¸ÀAZÀj¸ÀĪÀ J¯Áè ªÀiÁzÀjAiÀÄ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀAZÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¤µÉâü¸À¯ÁVzÉ. F ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ J£ï.f.N. PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄAzÉ JqÀ wgÀĪÀÅ
¥ÀqÉzÀÄ JA.J¸ï. ©°ØAUï ªÀÄÄA¨sÁUÀzÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ qÁ: ©.Dgï. CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï gÀ¸ÉÛ ¸ÉÃj C°èAzÀ PÉ.Dgï. ªÀÈvÀÛPÉÌ
vÀ®Ä¥À®Ä C£ÀĪÀÅ ªÀiÁqÀPÉÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
2.
PÀ§â£ï¥ÁPïð M¼À¨sÁUÀzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉAlæ¯ï ¯ÉÊ¨Éæj dAPÀë£ï¤AzÀ qÁ: ©.Dgï. CA¨ÉÃqÀÌgï gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ
(J£ï.f.N PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄA¨sÁUÀzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛ) gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ JgÀqÀÆ §¢UÀ¼À°è ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À ¤®ÄUÀqÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤µÉâü¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
CAvÉAiÉÄà PÀ®A 116 ªÉÆÃmÁgï ªÁºÀ£À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1988 ºÁUÀÆ PÀ®A 4 PÀ£ÁðlPÀ mÁæ¦üPï PÀAmÉÆæÃ¯ï DPïÖ 1960 gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ
C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ªÉÄîÌAqÀ KPÀ ªÀÄÄR ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£À ¤®ÄUÀqÉ ¤µÉÃzsÀzÀ ¸ÀAZÁgÀ ªÀiÁ¥ÁðqÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
eÁjUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ CUÀvÀå ¸ÀÆZÀ£Á ¥sÀ®PÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¸ÀܼÀUÀ¼À°è C¼ÀªÀr¸À®Ä ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
F ªÉÄîÌAqÀ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12-02-2013 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £Á£ÀÄ F ¢ªÀ¸À CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ £À£Àß ¸À» ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
P.R. 154
SC-100
©.f. eÉÆåÃw¥ÀæPÁ±ï «Äfð
¥Éưøï PÀ«ÄõÀ£Àgï,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ.
914
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÁ«ÄðPÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ PÁ«ÄðPÀgÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, G¥À-«¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj
¸ÀA.PÁC§-1/PÁ£À¥À/¹Dgï-06/2013/3108, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 02-02-2013
CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ
¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ
1)
²æÃªÀÄw. «±Á® @ «±Á¯ÁQë UÀAqÀ ¢||
§¸ÀªÀgÁd, ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 25 ªÀµÀð, (ªÀÄÈvÀ£À
ºÉAqÀw)
2) PÀĪÀiÁgÀ.
¸ÀÄ«ÄvÀæ
vÀAzÉ
§¸ÀªÀgÁd,
ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 3 ªÀµÀð.
3) ²æÃªÀÄw PÀªÀÄ®ªÀÄä UÀAqÀ ¢|| «ÃgÉñÀ,
(ªÀÄÈvÀ£À vÁ¬Ä)
ªÁ¸À ¸ÉÆÃªÀĸÀªÀÄÄzÀæ UÁæªÀÄ, §¼Áîj.
«gÀÄzÀÞ
1)
²æÃ C±ÉÆÃPÀ PÀĪÀiÁgï vÀAzÉ PÉ. ¥ÀgÀ±ÀÄgÁªÀÄ
gÁªï. ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 45 ªÀµÀð, ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ DmÉÆÃ
¸ÀASÉå PÉJ-34/J2235, ªÁ¸À-ªÁqïð £ÀA-13,
ªÀÄÆgÁj ©°ØAUï »A¨sÁUÀ, zÉë ¤ªÁ¸À §¼Áîj.
2) ¢|| r«f£À¯ï ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï
ªÉÄ|| AiÀÄÄ£ÉÊmÉqï EArAiÀiÁ E£ï±ÀÆågÉ£ïì PÀA¥À¤,
°«ÄmÉqï., PÉ.¹. gÀ¸ÉÛ JzÀÄgÀÄUÀqÉ gÁ¢üPÀ mÁQøï
ºÀwÛgÀ, §¼Áîj.
: ¥ÀæPÀluÉ :
F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ (1 jAzÀ 3) CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÈvÀ §¸ÀªÀgÁd, 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ°è
ZÁ®PÀ£ÁV PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09-02-2012 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀWÁvÀQÌÃqÁV ªÀÄÈvÀ¥ÀnÖzÁÝ£ÉAzÀÄ w½¹ vÁªÀÅ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ
ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ®A©vÀgÉAzÀÄ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ PÉÆÃj zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀjUÀÆ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ, CªÀ®A©vÀgÀÄ
JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÁzÀgÉ CAxÀªÀgÀÄ F ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀªÀ®AiÀÄ
ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁªÀÄ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀn¹zÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÉãÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè
w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃj §AzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
P.R. 155
SC-5
PÁ«ÄðPÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
PÁ«ÄðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ
§¼Áîj G¥À «¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj.
PÁ«ÄðPÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ PÁ«ÄðPÀgÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,
G¥À-«¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj
¸ÀA.PÁC§-1/PÁ£À¥À/¹Dgï-03/2013/3111, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-02-2013
CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ
¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ
1)
²æÃªÀÄw.
ºÉÆ£ÀÆßgï
©Ã
UÀAqÀ
¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï ¸Á¨ï @ EªÀİ ¸Á¨ï.
ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì: 45 ªÀµÀð, (ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À vÁ¬Ä)
2) PÀĪÀiÁj ±À©Ã£Á ©Ã vÀAzÉ ¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï
¸Á¨ï @ EªÀİ ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 16 ªÀµÀð.
3) PÀĪÀiÁj
ªÀi˯Á°
¸Á¨ï
vÀAzÉ
¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï ¸Á¨ï @ EªÀİ ¸Á¨ï.
ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 15 ªÀµÀð.
ªÁ¸À: CUÀ®ÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄ, ¹gÀÄUÀÄ¥Àà vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ,
§¼Áîj f¯Éè.
«gÀÄzÀÞ
1) ²æÃ.
¹.JA.zÀÄUÀðAiÀÄå
vÀAzÉ
¹.
ªÀÄjAiÀÄ¥Àà.
ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ mÁæPïÖgï ¸ÀASÉå:
PÉJ-35/n-3988.
ªÁ¸À: §¸À¥ÀÄgÀ UÁæªÀÄ, ªÀqÀÄØ CAZÉ.,
ºÉƸÀ¥ÉÃmÉ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ §¼Áîj f¯Éè.
2) ¢ ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï.
ªÉÄ|| ZÉÆÃ¼ÀªÀÄAqÀ®A d£ÀgÀ¯ï E£ÀÆågÉ£ïì PÀA¥À¤
°«ÄmÉqï., §¼Áîj.
3) ²æÃ ¸ÀÄzsÁPÀgï UËqÀ vÀAzÉ ¥ÉÆA¥À£ÀUËqÀ,
ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ mÉæöÊ®gï ¸ÀA:
PÉJ-34/nJ-2057.
ªÁ¸À: eÁ°¨ÉAa UÁæªÀÄ, §¼Áîj.
4) ¢ ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï.
ªÉÄ|| ºÉZï.r.J¥sï.¹. EDgïfN. d£ÀgÀ¯ï E£ÀÆågÉ£ïì
PÀA¥À¤ °«ÄmÉqï, §¼Áîj.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
915
: ¥ÀæPÀluÉ :
F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ (1 jAzÀ 3) CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÈvÀ ±ÀjÃ¥sÀªÀÄä @ ±ÀjÃ¥sÁ vÀAzÉ ¢|| EªÀiÁªÀiï ¸Á¨ï
@ EªÀİ ¸Á¨ï. 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ°è ºÀªÀiÁ°AiÀiÁV PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:30-08-2012 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀWÁvÀQÌÃqÁV
ªÀÄÈvÀ¥ÀnÖzÁݼÉAzÀÄ w½¹ vÁªÀÅ ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ®A©vÀgÉAzÀÄ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ PÉÆÃj zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀjUÀÆ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ ªÀÄÈvÀ¼À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ, CªÀ®A©vÀgÀÄ
JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÁzÀgÉ CAxÀªÀgÀÄ F ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀªÀ®AiÀÄ
ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁªÀÄ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀn¹zÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÉãÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè
w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃj §AzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
P.R. 156
SC-5
PÁ«ÄðPÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁ«ÄðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ
§¼Áîj G¥À «¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj.
PÁ«ÄðPÀ C¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ PÁ«ÄðPÀgÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ,
G¥À-«¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj
¸ÀA.PÁC§-1/PÁ£À¥À/¹Dgï-01/2013/3116, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-02-2013
CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ
¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ
1)
²æÃªÀÄw. FgÀPÀÌ @ ºÀjd£À FgÀPÀÌ UÀAqÀ ¢|| ºÀjd£À N§tÚ
@ ºÉZï. N§tÚ, ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 46 ªÀµÀð. (ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ºÉAqÀw)
2) ²æÃ. ªÀįÉïÁ ªÀiÁgÉ¥Àà @ ºÀjd£À ªÀiÁgÉ¥Àà vÀAzÉ ºÀjd£À
N§tÚ
@
ºÉZï.
N§tÚ.
(ªÀÄÈvÀ£À
ªÀÄUÀ)
ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 35 ªÀµÀð.
3) ²æÃ ºÀjd£À w¥ÉàøÁé«Ä @ w¥ÉàøÁé«Ä vÀAzÉ ºÀjd£À N§tÚ
@ ºÉZï N§tÚ. (ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÀÄUÀ) ªÀAiÀĸÀÄì 30 ªÀµÀð.
ªÁ¸À: §æºÀä¥ÀÄgÀºÀ½î, GgÀªÀPÉÆAqÀ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ,
ºÁ° ªÁ¸À: ±Á¹Ûçà £ÀUÀgÀ §¼Áîj.
«gÀÄzÀÞ
1)
²æÃªÀÄw J. ¸ÀgÉÆÃd UÀAqÀ J.
gÁªÀİAUÉñÀégÀ gÉrØ, ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ ¯Áj ¸ÀASÉå:
PÉJ-40/3618.
ªÁ¸À:- ¥Éưøï PÁélðgïì, ¥Àæ±ÁAvï £ÀUÀgÀ,
§¼Áîj f¯Éè.
2) ¢ ¨ÁæAZï ªÀiÁå£ÉÃdgï.
ªÉÄ|| j®AiÀÄ£ïì d£ÀgÀ¯ï E£ÀÆågÉ£ïì PÀA¥À¤
°«ÄmÉqï., ¥ÁªÀðw £ÀUÀgÀ, §¼Áîj.
: ¥ÀæPÀluÉ :
F ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ (1 jAzÀ 3) CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÈvÀ ºÀjd£À N§tÚ @ ºÉZï. N§tÚ vÀAzÉ wªÀÄä¥Àà.
1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ°è QèãÀgï£ÁV PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉAzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12-02-2009 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀWÁvÀQÌÃqÁV ªÀÄÈvÀ¥ÀnÖzÁÝ£ÉAzÀÄ w½¹
vÁªÀÅ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀ®A©vÀgÉAzÀÄ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ PÉÆÃj zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀjUÀÆ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀjUÀÆ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀÅzÉãÉAzÀgÉ ªÀÄÈvÀ£À ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ, CªÀ®A©vÀgÀÄ
JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀÅzÁzÀgÉ CAxÀªÀgÀÄ F ¥ÀæPÀluÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj ºÉÆgÀªÀ®AiÀÄ
ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁªÀÄ¥sÀ®PÀzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀn¹zÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼ÉãÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀݰè
w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃj §AzÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
P.R. 157
SC-5
PÁ«ÄðPÁ¢üPÁj ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁ«ÄðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ
§¼Áîj G¥À «¨sÁUÀ-1, §¼Áîj.
KARNATAKA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD
Office of the Chief Executive Officer,
Koushalya Bhavan, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore-560029,
No: CWWB/RGN/CR-01/2012-13, Date: 06-11-2012.
EXECUTIVE ORDER
Sub :
Authorization to M/s Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Bangalore for
registration of construction workers as beneficiaries under the provisions of BOCW
Act, 1996.
Ref :
1. Proceedings of the 10th Board meeting held on 22-08-2012.
2. Letter No. BMRCL/HRD/No.142/2009/5304, dated: 22-10-2012 received from
General Manager Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Bangalore.
916
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
The Board in its meeting held on 22-08-2012 had resolved that, Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Bangalore shall be
authorized to register the construction workers working in BMRCL project sites as beneficiaries under Building & Other Construction
Workers’ Act, 1996.
The General Manager, Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited in his letter dated: 22-10-2012 cited under reference (2)
above has furnished the list of the designated officers along with the details of their jurisdiction respectively to this office, who may be
authorized in this regard.
Therefore as per section 12(2) of the Building & Other Construction Workers’ (Regulations of Employment and Conditions of
the Services) Act, 1996, the following designated officers of Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited are hereby authorized to register
the construction workers engaged by them as beneficiaries in their project sites as mentioned in the table mentioned below.
Sl. No.
Designation of the officer
Assigned local limits
1
Chief Engineer
Reach-1 (Cricket stadium to Bayappanahalli)
2
Chief Engineer
Reach-2 (Leprosy Hospital to Mysore terminal)
3
Chief Engineer
Reach-3,
3a
and
3b
(Swastik
to
Yeshwanthpur,
Yeshwanthpur to Peenya Depot and Peenya village to
Hesaraghatta cross)
4
Chief Engineer
Reach-4 and 4a (KR Road to Puttenahalli cross terminal)
5
Chief Engineer
Under ground
P.R. 158
SC-100
Labour Commissioner & Chief Executive Officer.
IN THE COURT OF 4TH MMTC COURT, BANGALORE CITY
It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as unclaimed
and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put their claim
one month from the date of this publication.
Bangalore City
Dated :
4TH MMTC
Bangalore city
List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.
Sl. No
CR. NO & P.F No
VEHICLE & REG NO
ENGIN-NO
CHASSIS NO
1
18/13 U/S 98 K.P.ACT
P.F. NO 15 B/2013
1. HERO HONDA SPLENDOR
KA-02 EM-4902
04F16C31595
04F15M23022
2. HONDA ACTIVA
KA-01-Y-13
NO
JF608C0549389
2
18/13 U/S 98 K.P. ACT
P.F. NO 16/2013
1. BAJAJ SUPER
CTX-4649
NO
W05E083994
2. KINETIC HONDA
KA-03-L-6094
515117
327318NIE-HA
3. BAJAJ CHETAK
KA-05-H-9410
NO
EO6CM-313441
Bangalore City
P.R. 161
SC-5
4TH MMTC, Bangalore city
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
917
IN THE COURT OF 1ST ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY
It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as
unclaimed and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put
their claim within six months from the date of this publication.
Bangalore City
Dated :
1st ACMM Magistrate Court,
Bangalore city.
List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.
Sl. No.
NCR No
P.F. No
VEHICLE REG NO
CHASSIS NO
ENG-NO
1
14/2013
13/2013
KA-18-A-5851
AMFBLL01133
AAMBL423
2
18/2013
19/2013
KA-02-V-5164
31FBDE23740
31HBDE26743
3
21/2013
20/2013
KA-05-ER-4690
OHVBKJ62893
DHGBKJ62593
4
Cmiss No: 43/2013
15/2013 ‘A’
Yazidi 250 CC
-
-
Bangalore City
P.R. 162
1ST ACMM Magistrate Court,
Bangalore city
IN THE COURT OF 1ST ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY
It is hereby notified to the public that the Central Police Station, Bangalore city have seized the following vehicles as
unclaimed and such vehicles are lying in the Police Station as unclaimed so far. Hence the owners of the properties & vehicles may put
their claim within six months from the date of this publication.
Bangalore City
Dated :
1st ACMM
Magistrate Court, Bangalore city.
List of unclaimed vehicles are lying in Central Police Station, Bangalore city which have been seized under cases.
Sl
NCR No
P.F.No
VEHICLE
REG NO
CHASSIS NO
ENG-NO
1
145/2008
U/S 379 I.P.C
P.F. NO 03/2010
BAJAJ PULSOR
KA-01-EJ-9329
MD2DHJCZZRCD16315
JCGBR025129
P.R. 163
SC - 5
1ST ACMM Magistrate Court,
Bangalore city
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÉ
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À dAn ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¥ÁæAvÀ, ZÁªÀÄgÁd¥ÉÃmÉ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-18.
zÁªÁ ¸ÀASÉå : eÉDgï©/rLJ¸ï/167/1996-97
ªÁ¢ :
¥ÀæwªÁ¢ :
ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.
ZÁªÀÄgÁd¥ÉÃmÉ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 560 018.
«gÀÄzÀÞ
1. PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
2. qÁ|| ºÉZï.¦.±ÁAvÀPÀĪÀiÁgï,
©£ï.ºÉZï.PÉ.¥ÀÄlÖ¸Áé«Ä UËqÀ, CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ, £ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ
§¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-04.
918
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.
ZÁªÀÄgÁd¥ÉÃmÉ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 560 018.
«gÀÄzÀÞ
3. ²æÃ ¸ÀÄgÉñï,
©£ï ²æÃ gÀWÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
4. ²æÃ Cfvï J¸ï.ZÀqÀUÀgï,
©£ï ¸ÀvÀågÁeï ZÀqÀUÀgï,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
5. ²æÃ ©.eÉ.¸ÀÄgÉñï,
©£ï ¯ÉÃmï dªÀgÉÃUËqÀ,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
6. ²æÃªÀÄw PÉ.«.GµÁ,
PÉÆÃA ºÉZï.¦.±ÁAvÀPÀĪÀiÁgï,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
7. ²æÃªÀÄw ¸Á«vÀæªÀÄä,
PÉÆÃA ¯ÉÃmï PÉ.«ÃgÀAiÀÄå,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
8. ²æÃ zÉêÁ£ÀAzÀ ¥ÉÊ.PÉ.
©£ï UÉÆÃ¥Á® gÁªï PÉ.
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
9. ²æÃ G¯Áè¸ï J¸ï.
©£ï ¸ÀvÀågÁeï ZÀqÀUÀgï,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
10. ²æÃ £ÀgÀ¹AºÀAiÀÄå,
©£ï UÀAUÀtÚ,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
919
11. ²æÃ ºÀ£ÀĪÀÄPÀÌ PÉÆÃA £ÀgÀ¹AºÀAiÀÄå,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
12. ²æÃ «.J¸ï.£ÁAiÀÄÌ
©£ï ºÀjºÀgÀ £ÁAiÀÄÌ,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
13. ²æÃ PÉ.d£ÁzsÀð£À,
©£ï ¯ÉÃmï PÀȵÀÚ¥Àà,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
14. ²æÃ AiÀÄÄ.¸ÀzÁ²ªÀ±ÉnÖ,
©£ï AiÀÄÄ.¸ÀħâtÚ ±ÉnÖ,
¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÉÆÃ£ÁPïð PÉærmï PÉÆÃ-D¥ÀgÉÃnªï ¸ÉƸÉÊn °.,
£ÀA.56, ¸ÀħâgÁªÀÄZÉnÖ gÀ¸ÉÛ,
£ÉlÖPÀ®è¥Àà ªÀÈvÀÛ §¸ÀªÀ£ÀUÀÄr, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ- 04.
15. ²æÃ £ÁgÁAiÀÄt UËqÀ, ªÉÄÃdgï,
©£ï ¥ÀÄmÉÖÃUËqÀ, ªÀiÁf CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ
ºÁUÀÆ FV£À ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
PÉgɯÁ®Ä ¸ÀAzÀæ, ªÀļÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ, PÀ¸À¨Á ºÉÆÃ§½,
PÀ£ÀPÀ¥ÀÄgÀ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.
16. ²æÃ J¸ï.f.ZɮĪÀAiÀÄå, ªÉÄÃdgï,
ªÀiÁf G¥ÁzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
¸ÉÆAqÉPÉÆ¥Àà, ¸ÉÆAqÉPÉÆ¥Àà ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ,
£É®ªÀÄAUÀ® vÁ:, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.
17. ²æÃ «.ZÀ£ÀߥÀà, ªÉÄÃdgï,
ªÀiÁf ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤., £ÉgÀ¼ÀWÀlÖ,
Ct¨É ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ, zÉÆqÀا¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ vÁ:,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.
18. ²æÃ J. £ÀgÀ¹AºÀAiÀÄå,
ªÉÄÃdgï, ªÀiÁf ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
UÀAnUÁ£ÀºÀ½î ¥ÉÆÃ¸ïÖ, PÀÄgÀĪÉÃUÉgÉ, zÉÆqÀا¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ
vÁ:, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.
19. ²æÃ J£ï.J¸ï.£ÀgÀ¸ÉÃUËqÀ,
ªÉÄÃdgï, ªÀiÁf ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
£ÀA.692, ‘J’ 8£Éà ªÉÄãï, 3£Éà ¸ÉÖÃeï, 3£Éà ¨ÁèPï,
§¸ÀªÉñÀégÀ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-79.
920
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
20. ²æÃ ©.gÁ«Ä gÉrØ. ªÉÄÃdgï,
ªÀiÁf ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
£ÀA.124, ‘J’ ¥ÉÆèÃgï, 26£Éà PÁæ¸ï, 6£Éà ¨ÁèPï,
dAiÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-20.
21. ²æÃ PÉ.n.ªÉAPÀl¸Áé«Ä, ªÉÄÃdgï,
ªÀiÁf ±ÁSÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ (¤ªÀÈvÀÛ),
PÉÃAzÀæ PÀbÉÃj ±ÁSÉ,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
£ÀA.1013 E, ªÀÄÆPÁA©PÀ J.Dgï,
CªÉ£ÀÆå, £ÀÆå w¥Àà¸ÀAzÀæ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-75.
22. ²æÃ JA.£ÁUÀgÁd,
(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï) ±ÁSÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ,
PÉÃAzÀæ PÉÃbÉÃj, ©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï
¤., ¢rبÁV®Ä, ªÀÄgÁoÀ ¹ÖçÃmï, vÁåUÀgÁd gÉÆÃqï,
D£ÉÃPÀ¯ï mË£ï, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ (UÁæ) f¯Éè.
23. ²æÃ ºÉZï.eÉ.gÀAUÀgÁdÄ,
(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï) ±ÁSÁ ¸ÀÆ¥ÀgïªÉʸÀgï,
PÉÃAzÀæ PÀbÉÃj, dƤAiÀÄgï C¹¸ÉÖAmï, ©r CAqï
©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤., £ÀA.213, 1£Éà PÁæ¸ï,
gÉªÉÆÌà ¯ÉÃOmï, «dAiÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-40.
24. ²æÃ gÁªÀÄPÀȵÀÚ ªÉÄÃdgï,
±ÁSÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÁÜ¥ÀPÀgÀÄ,
(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï), ©r CAqï
©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤., (¥Áè¤AUï &
qɪÀ®¥ïªÉÄAmï ±ÁSÉ), £ÀA.221, 5£Éà PÁæ¸ï,
1£Éà ªÉÄÊ£ï, 1£Éà ºÀAvÀ, PÉ.ºÉZï.©. PÁ¯ÉÆÃ¤.,
§¸ÀªÉñÀégÀ£ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-79
25. ²æÃ ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,
(¥Ëw) CªÀgÀ ªÁgÀ¸ÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ,
25. 1J. ²æÃªÀÄw ºÉZï.J¸ï.ºÀjtÂ,
PÉÆÃA: ¯ÉÃmï: ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,
1©. ²æÃ. QÃwð PÀAzÁ,
©£ï: ¯ÉÃmï: ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,
1¹. ²æÃ ZÀgÀuï,
©£ï ¯ÉÃmï: ºÉZï.©.GªÉÄñï,
«¼Á¸À: £ÀA.112, L.¹.J¸ï.¹.ªÉÄÊ£ï gÉÆÃqï,
£ÁUÀgÀ¨sÁ«, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-72.
26. ²æÃ ©.ªÀÄÈvÀÄåAdAiÀÄ,
(CAqÀgï ¸À¸ï¥É£ïµÀ£ï), ¹Ã¤AiÀÄgï C¹¸ÉÖAmï,
©r CAqï ©DgïDgïr¹¹ ¨ÁåAPï ¤.,
(¥Áè¤AUï & qɪÀ®¥ïªÉÄAmï ±ÁSÉ), £ÀA.1087,
15£Éà © PÁæ¸ï, 2£Éà ºÀAvÀ, AiÀÄ®ºÀAPÀ £ÀÆå mË£ï,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-64.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
921
“1959gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄ PÀ®A 103 gÀ jÃvÁå ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzÉñÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄ£Àß
d¦Û ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÉ w¼ÀĪÀ½PÉ £ÉÆÃn¸ÀÄ”
1.
ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1959gÀ PÀ®A 70gÀr zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹ 1 jAzÀ 30£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ½AzÀ
gÀÆ.4,36,78,537/- (gÀÆ.£Á®ÄÌ PÉÆÃn ªÀÄĪÀvÁÛgÀÄ ®PÀëzÀ J¥ÀàvÉÛAlÄ ¸Á«gÀ LzÀÄ £ÀÆgÀ ªÀÄÆªÀvÀÛÉüÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ) UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ F ªÉÆvÀÛPÉÌ
¢£ÁAPÀ:24-05-1996 jAzÀ ¸Á°AiÀiÁ£À ±ÉÃ.22gÀµÀÄÖ §rØ zÀgÀzÀAvÉ C¸À®Ä ªÀÄvÀÄÛ §rØ ªÀ¸ÀƯÁwUÁV zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ, F
zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ, «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqɸÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ. ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:03-12-2012 gÀAzÀÄ
¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÉÆA¢UÉ PÀ®A 103 gÀr CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw J£ï ¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï. «dAiÀÄ
PÁwðPï, gÀªÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ EgÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzÉñÀ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
2.
CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ PÀ®A 103gÀ Cfð eÉÆvÉ ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ
E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ 1994£Éà ¸Á°£À°è gÀzÀÄÝ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ UËgÀªÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¥Àæ²ß¹zÀÄÝ, jmï
C¦üÃ®Ä ¸ÀA.2218 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 2219 C/WÀ/1991 ºÁUÀÆ 1992/1994 F jmï C¦üð£À£ÀéAiÀÄ UËgÀªÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ 15 jAzÀ 19
gÀªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß Government Nominees as Ad-Hoc Committee members to from bank administration till holding of new election on
02-12-1994 CzÀgÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj CqÁPï PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ:13-05-1994 gÀªÀgÉUÉ PÁgÀ太Àð»¹gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F CªÀ¢üAiÀİè 15£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ
CzsÀåPÀëgÁV PÁgÀ太À𻹠F CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¸Á®UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DzÀgÉ CqÁPï PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄÄ ªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ°è
gÀÆ.4,00,00,000/-PÉÌ ¢£ÁAPÀ:15-04-1995 gÀAzÀÄ Cfð ¸À°è¹ ¸Á®ªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DzÀgÉ F ¸Á® ªÀÄAdÆgÁwAiÀİè CqÁPï
PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄÄ UËgÀªÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¨ÉʯÁ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸Á®UÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£É ªÀiÁr, CfðzÁgÀ
¨ÁåAQUÉ ¸ÀļÀÄî ªÀiÁ»w ¤Ãr ªÉÆÃ¸À ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DzÀgÉ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ 1£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ vÀ£Àß PÁgÀåZÀlĪÀnPÉ £ÀqɸÀzÉà EgÀĪÀAvÀºÀ
¹ÜwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀ®Ä¦gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÀÄÄAzÉAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀºÀ PÁgÀåZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ E®èªÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÀUÀAqÀÄ PÀ®A 70gÀrAiÀİè zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. F J¯Áè CªÀåªÀºÁgÀPÉÌ CqÁPï PÀ«ÄnAiÀÄ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¨ÁåAQ£À £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ M¼ÀUÀÆr ªÉÊAiÀÄQÛPÀªÁV ªÀÄvÀÄÛ dAnAiÀiÁV
CªÀåªÀºÁgÀ £Àqɹ CfðzÁgÀ ¨ÁåAQ£À ¸Á®zÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉÆAqÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¨ÁåAQUÉ £ÀµÀÖ GAmÁUÀ®Ä PÁgÀt PÀvÀðgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
F »£É߯ÉAiÀİè zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÀÆqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. DzÀgÉ F zÁªÉ EvÀåxÀðªÁUÀĪÀ°è PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ jÃvÁå £ÀqÀªÀ½PÉUÀ¼ÀÄ £Àqɹ EvÀåxÀð¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ°è
¸ÀªÀÄAiÀiÁªÀPÁ±À vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆ¼ÀÄîwÛzÀÄÝ, F ªÀÄzsÀå ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ºÉ¸Àj£À°ègÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁgÁl ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉUÀ½gÀÄvÀÛªÉ. MAzÀÄ
ªÉÃ¼É F jÃw ¥ÀæwªÁ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ºÉ¸Àj£À°ègÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁgÁl ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è F zÁªÉAiÀÄ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ CfðzÁgÀ ¨ÁåAQ£À
¥ÀgÀªÁV §AzÀgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ CªÁqïð ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀ¸Àư ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀzÀ ¥Àj¹Üw GAmÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ PÀ®A
103gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ Cfð DzsÁjvÀ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï ¸ÉÃjzÀ
¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzÉñÀPÉÌ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
3.
ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ PÀ®A 103gÀrAiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ CfðAiÀİè w½¹gÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁV F ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼ÀÄ 19£ÉÃ
¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. DzÀgÉ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀévÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ
EgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ¸ÀA§AzsÀªÁV ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ ¸À°è¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è w½¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁV
19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ zÀÄgÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£É ºÁUÀÆ zÀÆgÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£É JgÀqÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr ªÁ¢ ¨ÁåAQ£À zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß
ªÀ¸ÀƯÁwUÉ zÁªÉ ºÀÆrgÀĪÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀİè vÀ£Àß ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ ¹ÜgÁ¹Û EzÀÝ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è CzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀAgÀQë¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ/«¯ÉªÁjªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀµÀÖ¸ÁzsÀåªÁUÀĪÀ
CA±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß CjwgÀĪÀ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ vÀ£Àß ªÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÄÊ£Àgï EzÀÝ CªÀ¢üAiÀİè CªÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ
PÀAqÀħA¢gÀĪÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀİè PÀ®A 103gÀrAiÀİè w½¹gÀĪÀ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ (ºÁ° ªÉÄÃdgï) PÉÆÃA
Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï EªÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀjUÉ EgÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß d¦üÛ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÉAzÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀqÀÄvÁÛ,
F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉñÀ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ £ÉÆÃn¸À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
“ DzÉñÀ ”
ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ 1959gÀ PÀ®A 70 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ®A 103 ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀA.¹N/139/¹JAJ¯ï/2010 ¢£ÁAPÀ:17-02-2011 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸ÀÄvÁÛ ©üêÀĸÉãÀ §APÀzÀ,
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À dAn ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¥ÁæAvÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw.J£ï.¹ävÀ PÉÆÃA
Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï «dAiÀÄ PÁwðPï gÀªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°ègÀĪÀ F PɼÀV£À µÉqÀÆå¯ï£À°è PÁt¹gÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß µÀgÀwÛUÉÆ¼À¥ÀlÄÖ F ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ
CAwªÀÄ wæðUÉ d¦üÛ ¥ÀƪÀð DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä µÀgÀvÀÄÛ §zÀÞ £ÉÆÃn¸ÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ¹ävÀgÀªÀgÀÄ, MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É F d¦üÛ ¥ÀƪÀð £ÉÆÃn¹£À°è w½¹gÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß/¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ
¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F £ÉÆÃn¹¤AzÀ ªÀÄÄPÀÛ ªÀiÁr¹PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä EaÒ¹zÀ°è F zÁªÁ CfðAiÀÄ°è ªÁ¢AiÀÄÄ PÉèöÊA ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ ªÉÆvÀÛ gÀÆ.4,36,78,537/-
(gÀÆ.£Á®ÄÌ PÉÆÃn ªÀÄĪÀvÁÛgÀÄ ®PÀëzÀ J¥ÀàvÉÛAlÄ ¸Á«gÀ LzÀÄ £ÀÆgÀ ªÀÄÆªÀvÀÛÉüÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ) UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÁ¢ ¨ÁåAQ£À°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ SÁvÉUÉ F
DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ 30 ¢ªÀ¸ÀzÉÆ¼ÀUÁV dªÀiÁ ªÀiÁr C¢üPÀÈvÀ ZÀ®£ï/gÀ¹Ã¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ°è F DzÉñÀzÀ°è w½¹gÀĪÀ µÉqÀÆå¯ï
¸ÀévÀÛ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄPÀÛUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀ µÀgÀwÛUÉ M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É 19£Éà ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀÄ ªÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ²æÃªÀÄw ¹ävÀ gÀªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹gÀĪÀAvÉ F DzÉñÀ
ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ 30 ¢ªÀ¸ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÁV CªÀ±ÀåPÀ«gÀĪÀ £ÀUÀzÀÄ ¨sÀzÀævÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ®Ä «¥sÀ®gÁzÀ°è F DzÉñÀ ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ £ÉÆÃn¹£À DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¹ÜjÃPÀj¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
F PɼÀUÉ µÉqÀÆå¯ï£À°è PÁt¹gÀĪÀ ¹ÜgÁ¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß Rjâ¸ÀĪÀ°è D¸ÀQÛ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ªÀåQÛUÀ½UÉ F D¹Û ¥ÀƪÀð d¦üÛ DzÉñÀªÀÅ
M¼À¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
922
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
“ µÉqÀÆå¯ï D¹Û «ªÀgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ”
All that piece and parcel of the agriculture property bearing Sy No.86/1, measuring 2 Acres 38 Guntas, Sy No 87/3 measuring
1 Acres 20 Guntas and Sy No 87/2, measuring 1 Acres 29 Guntas, in total 6 Acres 07 Guntas situated at Naranahalli Village, C.S.pura
Hobli, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur District and commonly Bounded as per registered Gift deed.
East by
: Property belongs Shubha N.
West by : Hemavathi Kaluve
North by : Property belongs to Siddegowda and Gangarevemma
South by : Property belongs to Ramaiah.
F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £À£Àß ¸À» ºÁUÀÆ PÀbÉÃj ªÉƺÀgÀÄ ¤²AiÉÆA¢UÉ F ¢£À CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
P.R. 209
©üêÀĸÉãÀ §APÀzÀ,
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À dAn ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ,
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¥ÁæAvÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ.
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, BANGALORE-1.
Consumer Price Index Numbers For Industrial Workers
No. DES 38 PWX 2012 December, 2012
State: Karnataka
Base: 1987-88=100
Date:16th February, 2013
Group/Sub-Group
Bellary
Bhadravathi
Davangere
Dandeli
Gulbarga
Harihar
Hassan
Mandya
Mangalore
Raichur
Tumkur
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I.
FOOD:
a) Cereals & Products
778
847
956
819
752
839
812
871
649
869
721
b) Pulses & Products
696
771
811
852
752
736
700
816
684
755
734
c) Oil & Fats
372
416
430
384
489
420
461
498
273
511
442
d) Meat, Fish & Eggs
884
881
976
824
965
911
842
873
684
1072
850
e) Milk & Products
632
535
700
684
583
686
546
658
615
613
518
f) Condiments & Spices
532
602
801
852
421
486
616
603
525
714
632
g) Vegetables & Fruits
703
683
787
806
625
687
786
728
631
629
895
h) Other Food
578
826
681
681
620
568
634
638
525
578
558
FOOD GROUP INDEX
681
741
812
746
667
694
707
769
594
753
667
II.
Pan, Supari, Tobacco &
Intoxicants
767
800
808
586
574
756
692
691
523
637
716
III.
Fuel & Light
547
490
595
654
567
576
538
625
434
660
449
IV.
Housing
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
VI.
Clothing, Bedding &
Footwear
290
531
404
396
380
391
533
650
316
654
234
MISCELLANEOUS:
a) Medical Care
666
914
505
457
359
306
531
552
354
456
262
b) Education, Recreation &
Amusement
611
651
951
347
675
888
611
546
850
1118
809
c) Transport &
Communication
692
738
654
655
667
690
603
932
913
494
712
d) Personal Care & Effects
396
436
550
453
516
421
413
472
439
426
400
e) others
493
474
599
586
447
427
467
629
349
622
370
Miscellaneous group
531
581
647
480
525
524
500
578
575
610
477
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
923
GENERAL INDEX
553
600
647
586
530
552
583
642
508
638
473
To Convert To Base 1960
Multiply by Linking Factor
7.39
9.19
8.27
-
8.26
8.56
9.25
7.92
9.31
-
-
.
JOINT DIRECTOR,
Directorate of Economics & Statistics,
Government of Karnataka, Bangalore
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF LABOUR, LABOUR BUREAU
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NUMBERS FOR INDUSTRIAL WORKERS (BASE-2001=100)
Month: December, 2012
Group/Sub-Group/Centre
BANGALORE
BELGAUM
HUBLI -
DHARWAD
MERCARA
MYSORE
1
2
3
4
5
6
FOOD:
Cereals & Products
205
212
256
210
234
Pulses & Products
238
249
262
257
255
Oil & Fats
243
249
248
278
250
Meat, Fish & Eggs
281
312
314
258
287
Milk & Products
219
265
224
213
234
Condiments & Spices
238
207
253
231
234
Vegetables & Fruits
234
288
274
232
228
Other Food
272
257
253
248
238
FOOD GROUP
237
246
257
233
240
Pan, Supari, Tobacco & Intoxicants
207
219
217
185
266
Fuel & Light
165
180
180
342
187
Housing Index-
210
210
247
101
222
Clothing, Bleeding & Footwear
142
162
146
166
168
Miscellaneous:
Medical Care
236
201
201
185
177
Education, Recreation & Amusement
161
147
168
336
118
Transport & Communication
304
260
280
235
244
Personal Care & Effects
220
190
196
196
199
others
219
193
205
208
232
Miscellaneous Group
234
199
211
229
188
GENERAL INDEX
219
222
234
221
218
L.R.CHAUHAN,
ECONOMIC OFFICER,
P.R. 226
JOINT DIRECTOR,
Directorate of Economics & Statistics,
Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÉ
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, «Ä¤ «zsÁ£À¸ËzsÀ, PÉÆoÀr ¸ÀASÉå: 305, 2£Éà ªÀĺÀr, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè,
vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄzÀ £ÀqÀªÀ½PÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
¸ÀÜVvÀUÉÆArgÀĪÀ GuÉÚ PÉʪÀÄUÀÎ £ÉÃPÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¤., PÁªÀÄUÉÆAqÀ£ÀºÀ½î ²gÁ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ
F ¸ÀAWÀªÀ£ÀÄß IÄt¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£ÉUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.
924
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
G¯ÉèÃR :
1)
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ ªÀÄzsÀÄVj G¥À«¨sÁUÀ ªÀÄzsÀÄVj EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ
¸ÀASÉå: ¸À¤33:JA.PÉn:¸ÀÜVvÀ:138/2011-12 ¢£ÁAPÀ : 29-02-2012
2)
F PÀbÉÃj¬ÄAzÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ ¤ÃrzÀ w¼ÀĪÀ½PÉ ¥ÀvÀæ
¸ÀASÉå:rDgïn:¸ÀÜVvÀ/2012-13, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 08-05-2012.
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :-
¸ÀÜVvÀUÉÆAqÀ GuÉÚ PÉʪÀÄUÀÎ £ÉÃPÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¤., PÁªÀÄUÉÆAqÀ£ÀºÀ½î ²gÁ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ F ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ rDgïn:817/1955-56
¢£ÁAPÀ:
14-05-1956
gÀ°è
F
PÀbÉÃjAiÀİè
£ÉÆÃAzÀtÂAiÀiÁVzÀÄÝ
EzÀgÀ
PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄÄ
vÁ®ÆèPï
ªÀÄlÖQÌAvÀ
PÀrªÉÄ
PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄļÀîzÁÝVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ vÀ£Àß ¨ÉʯÁPÀÌ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸ÀzÉà F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀzÉÆÃµÀUÀ¼À£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆArgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
1)
¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÀĺÁ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀzÉà EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G®èAWÀ£É ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
2) ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼ÀÄ 1988-99£Éà ¸Á°£ÀªÀgÉUÉ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥Àj±ÉÆÃzsÀ£É DVzÀÄÝ F vÀºÀ¯ïªÀgÉ«UÀÆ ¯ÉPÀÌ¥Àj±ÉÆÃzsÀ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
3) ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸À¨sÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀzÉà ¨ÉʯÁ G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
4) ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄÄ ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀĪÁVzÀÄÝ FªÀgÉ«UÀÆ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ gÀZÀ£ÉUÉ PÀæªÀÄ«nÖgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ 2010-11gÀªÀgÉ«UÉ CªÀ¢ü ªÀÄÄV¢zÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 2010-11£Éà ¸Á®ÄUÀ¼À ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÀĺÁ¸À¨sÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ £ÀqɸÀ®Ä
«¥sÀ®ªÁV ¸ÀAWÀzÀ G¥À¤AiÀĪÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G®èAWÀ£É ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ, PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ªÀÄAqÀ½ C¹ÛvÀéPÉÌ PÀæªÀÄ«qÀzÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ
PÁAiÀÄð¸ÀÜVvÀ ¸ÀAWÀªÁV ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¥ÀÄ£ÀB±ÉÑÃvÀ£ÀPÉÌ D¸ÀQÛ vÉÆÃgÀ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ G¯ÉèÃR(2)gÀ°è
£ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀAvÉ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀåjUÉ F PÀbÉÃj¬ÄAzÀ w¼ÀĪÀ½PÉ ¥ÀvÀæ ¤ÃqÀzÁUÀÆå F §UÉÎ AiÀiÁgÀÄ D¸ÀQÛ ªÀ»¸ÀzÀ PÁgÀt F
PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉñÀ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
DzÉñÀ
¸ÀASÉå : rDgïn/J¯ïPÀÆår/¹Dgï64/2012-13, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 19-02-2013.
ºÉZï.¨Á®±ÉÃRgï PÉ.¹.J¸ï ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ
¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À PÁ¬ÄzÉ 1959gÀ PÀ®A 72(2) (©) ºÁUÀÆ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå ¦.E/139/¹J¯ïJA/2010 ¢£ÁAPÀ:17-02-
2011gÀAvÉ zÀvÀÛªÁVgÀĪÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹ GuÉÚ PÉʪÀÄUÀÎ £ÉÃPÁgÀgÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ ¤., PÁªÀÄUÉÆAqÀ£ÀºÀ½î ²gÁ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ EzÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£ÉUÉÆ½¹ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ C¢üPÁj PÀbÉÃj ²gÁgÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀAWÀzÀ IÄt ¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£Á¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV
£ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁr DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. IÄt ¸ÀªÀiÁ¥À£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¥ÀÆtð ¥Àæ¨sÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖªÀjAzÀ ªÀ»¹PÉÆAqÀÄ
¥Àæ¨sÁgÀ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F PÀbÉÃjUÉ ¸À°è¸À®Ä w½¹zÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¯ÉêÁj ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä DzÀåvÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ ¥ÀæwUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
F PÀbÉÃjUÉ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉUÉ ¸À°è¹ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ DzÀåvÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ «¯ÉêÁj ªÀiÁr ¸ÀAWÀzÀ £ÉÆÃAzÀt gÀzÀÞwUÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÉ ¸À°è¸À®Ä
DzÉò¹zÉ.
F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß £À£Àß ¸À» ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀbÉÃj ªÀÄÄzÉæAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 19-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
P.R. 228
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À-¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ,
vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ
²PÀët ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
wzÀÄÝ¥Àr
¸ÀASÉå: Er 271 rfJA 2012 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:04-03-2013.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå: Er 271 rfJA 2012 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-10-2012gÀ°è ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ UÀÆæ¥ï-J
QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ ²PÀëuÁ¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ vÀvÀìªÀiÁ£À ªÀÈAzÀzÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CAwªÀÄ eÉåõÀ×vÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀæPÀn¸À¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå: Er 101 rfN 2009, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-04-2010PÉÌ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ C£ÀħAzsÀzÀ°ègÀĪÀAvÉ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁr DzÉò¹zÉ.
PÀæ.
¸ÀA.
UÀÆæ¥ï J
QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂ
eÉåõÀ×vÁ
¸ÀASÉå
UÀÆæ¥ï ©
eÉåõÀ×vÁ
¸ÀASÉå
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ
²æÃ/²æÃªÀÄw
d£Àä ¢£ÁAPÀ
UÀÆæ¥ï © ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ
£ÉêÀÄPÁw / §rÛ
ºÉÆA¢zÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ
UÀÆæ¥ï J
QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂUÉ
§rÛ ºÉÆA¢zÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ
µÀgÁ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
733
123
PÉ.PÁAvÀgÁdÄ
20-06-57
15-01-94
03-07-2007
734
123J
J.±ÁåªÀĸÀÄAzÀgï
23-07-63
22-01-94
03-07-2007
735
123 ©
PÉ.²ªÉÃUËqÀ
05-07-63
27-01-94
03-07-2007
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
925
PÀæ.
¸ÀA.
UÀÆæ¥ï J
QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂ
eÉåõÀ×vÁ
¸ÀASÉå
UÀÆæ¥ï ©
eÉåõÀ×vÁ
¸ÀASÉå
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ
²æÃ/²æÃªÀÄw
d£Àä ¢£ÁAPÀ
UÀÆæ¥ï © ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ
£ÉêÀÄPÁw / §rÛ
ºÉÆA¢zÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ
UÀÆæ¥ï J
QjAiÀÄ ±ÉæÃtÂUÉ
§rÛ ºÉÆA¢zÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ
µÀgÁ
736
124
n.J£ï.UÁAiÀÄwæzÉë
17-04-64
17-01-94
03-07-2007
737
125
¥ÀæPÁ±À ¹zÀÞ¥Àà ªÀÄ£ÀßAV
01-07-56
21-01-94
03-07-2007
738
126
©.gÁªÀiÁAd£ÉÃAiÀÄ
01-06-60
19-01-94
03-07-2007
739
126J
eÉ.©.ªÀĤßPÉÃj
15-11-63
01-02-94
03-07-2007
¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå
740
127
J£ï.PÉAZÉÃUËqÀ
05-03-63
01-02-94
03-07-2007
P.R. 220
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
²æÃ¥ÁzÀÄ.ºÉZï.J£ï,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
²PÀët E¯ÁSÉ (¸À«ÄwUÀ¼ÀÄ).
¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ
EªÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è
G¥À¹ÜvÀgÀÄ
Dgï.ªÉAPÀmÉñÀ ¥ÀzÀQ ¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ
aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ
r.n.¹.Dgï-127/2012-13, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 27£Éà ¥sɧæªÀj, 2013.
¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ :-
D¥Á¢vÀgÀÄ :-
¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ªÀÄÄRå ¥ÉÃzÉ
CdÓA¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ
«gÀÄzÀÞ
ºÉêÀÄtÚ ©£ï ¹zÀÞ¥Àà,
CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ.
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
1.
¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-08-2010 gÀAzÀÄ ¨É½UÉÎ 6.00 UÀAmÉ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ªÀÄÄRå ¥ÉÃzÉ, CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ G¥À ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ
PÀvÀðªÀåzÀ°èzÁÝUÀ EªÀjUÉ §AzÀ RavÀ ªÀiÁ»w ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ oÁuÉAiÀÄ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¹§âA¢UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀAZÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ oÁuÉ
¸ÀgÀºÀ¢Ý£À CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ ²æÃ ¹zÀÞgÁªÀÄ¥ÀàgÀªÀgÀ UÀÄr¸À°£À ºÀwÛgÀ ºÉÆÃV £ÉÆÃqÀ¯ÁV E§â D¸Á«ÄAiÀÄÄ J¯ï.JA.J¯ï. ¦üæÃqÀªÀiï ªÉÆÃmÁgï
¸ÉÊPÀ¯ï £ÀA.PÉJ:18.PÉ-7950 gÀ°è ©½ §tÚzÀ §mÉÖ aîzÀ°è MAzÀÄ «¹Ì ¨ÁPïì£ÀÄß ElÄÖPÉÆAqÀÄ ¤AwzÀÄÝ, D¸Á«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß »rzÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
«¼Á¸À PÉüÀ¯ÁV ºÉêÀÄtÚ ©£ï ¹zÀÞ¥Àà, CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ JAzÀÄ w½¹zÀÄÝ, ¥ÀAZÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄPÀëªÀÄ ¨ÉÊPï£À°èzÀÝ ¨ÁPïì£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÁUÀ gÁd «¹Ì JA§
¯Éç¯ï EgÀĪÀ 180 «Ä°AiÀÄ 48 PÁålðgï ¨Ál°UÀ¼À°è 8,640 °Ãlgï ªÀÄzÀå vÀÄA©zÀÄÝ, ªÀÄzÀåPÉÌ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV EzÉAiÉÄÃ
JAzÀÄ PÉýzÀÝPÉÌ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÀÄ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV EgÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¹zÀÝjAzÀ EzÀÄ CPÀæªÀÄ ªÀÄzÀåªÉAzÀÄ zÀÈqsÀ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ zÉÆgÉvÀ ªÀÄzÀå ºÁUÀÆ
ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀAZÀgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄPÀëªÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è C£ÀĸÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¹, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀ±ÀPÉÌ CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ oÁuÉUÉ §AzÀÄ
¤ÃrzÀ ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄ, ªÀÄzÀåzÀ ¹Ã¸ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ DgÉÆÃ¦AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ oÁuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÉæöÊA
£ÀA.106/2010, ¢£ÁAPÀ:10-08-2010 gÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ zÁR®Ä ªÀiÁr, ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ªÀiÁ»w ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ºÁUÀÆ
ªÉÄïÁ¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸À°è¹, vÀ¤SÉ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɹ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ CAwªÀÄ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ ¸À°è¹zÀÄÝ, WÀ£À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀgÀt
ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄUÉÆAqÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ F ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£É ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆArzÀÝ ªÀÄzÀåzÀ
¥ÉÊQ (gÁ¸ÁAiÀĤPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÉ ªÀiÁzÀj ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀ) ªÀÄzÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß C§PÁj ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, PÀqÀÆgÀÄ ªÀ®AiÀÄ EªÀjUÉ
ºÀ¸ÁÛAvÀj¹zÀÄÝ, ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ “©” JPïìmÁæPïÖ ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ zÁR¯ÁwUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ:13-11-2012 gÀAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
2.
ªÀ±À¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ªÁºÀ£À ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄzÀåPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ°£À £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj PÁAiÉÄÝ
1965 gÀ PÀ®A 43(J)AiÀÄ jÃvÁå ¥ÁægÀA©ü¹ ªÁºÀ£À ªÀiË®å zÀÈrüÃPÀgÀt PÉÆÃj ¥ÁæzÉòPÀ ¸ÁjUÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀjUÉ ¥ÀvÀæ
§gÉAiÀįÁ¬ÄvÀÄ. ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°ègÀĪÀ DgÉÆÃ¦ ºÉêÀÄtÚ ©£ï ¹zÀÞ¥Àà 38 ªÀµÀð, FrUÀgÀ d£ÁAUÀ, fgÁAiÀÄÄvÀÄ PÉ®¸À,
CAvÀgÀWÀmÉÖ, PÀqÀÆgÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ “©” JPïìmÁæPïÖ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ²æÃ PÉ.J¯ï. ¥ÀæPÁ±À ©£ï °AUÀ¥Àà JA.PÉ.PÀ¯ÉèãÀºÀ½î, vÁåUÀgÀPÀmÉÖ CAZÉ,
vÀjÃPÉgÉ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ EªÀjUÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj PÁAiÉÄÝ 1965 gÀ PÀ®A 43(©) ¥ÀæPÁgÀ £ÉÆnøï£ÀÄß £ÉÆAzÁ¬ÄvÀ CAZÉ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ,
F ¥ÉÊQ PÉ.J¯ï. ¥ÀæPÁ±À JA§ÄªÀªÀjUÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 31-01-2013 gÀAzÀÄ eÁjAiÀiÁzÀ ¹éÃPÀÈwAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ªÀÄgÀ½
§A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. CAvÀAiÉÄà C§PÁj ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ PÀqÀÆgÀÄ ªÀ®AiÀÄ EªÀgÀÆ PÀÆqÁ £ÉÆÃnøï£ÀÄß RÄzÁÝV DgÉÆÃ¦ ºÉêÀÄtÚ EªÀgÀ ªÀÄUÀ£ÁzÀ
926
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
J.Dgï.CtÚAiÀÄå EªÀjUÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀ PÉ.J¯ï. ¥ÀæPÁ±ï EªÀgÀ CPÀÌ£À ªÀÄUÀ Dgï.¥ÀæPÁ±ï JA§ÄªÀªÀjUÉ eÁjUÉÆ½¹ ¹éÃPÀÈw
¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13-02-2013 gÀAzÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
3.
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°ègÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀASÉå: PÉJ:18.PÉ-7950 J¯ï.JA.J¯ï ¦üæÃqÀªÀiï ¨ÉÊPïUÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 15-01-2013 gÀAzÀÄ gÀÆ.9,000/-
(MA§vÀÄÛ ¸Á«gÀ gÀÆ¥Á¬ÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ)UÀ¼À ªÀiË®å zÀÈrüÃPÀj¹ ªÉÆÃmÁgï ªÁºÀ£À ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÁæzÉòPÀ ¸ÁjUÉ PÀbÉÃj, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ
ªÀgÀ¢ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
4.
ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ F ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ PÀ®A 43(©) £ÉÆÃnøï£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¹zÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è C®èzÉ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtPÉÌ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¥ÀÆgÀPÀªÁV D¥ÁzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C®èUÀ¼ÉAiÀÄ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À
ªÀÄÆ®PÀªÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ ¸ÁPÀëöåUÀ¼À ªÀÄÆ®PÀªÁUÀ° vÁªÀÅ PÀÈvÀåzÀ°è ¨sÁVAiÀiÁV®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F PÀÈvÀåPÉÌ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¸À¯ÁV®èªÉA§ §UÉÎ
¤gÀƦ¸ÀzÉà EgÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ §A¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä AiÉÆÃUÀåªÉAzÀÄ
¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ C©üAiÉÆÃUÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀnÖgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
5.
ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ zÁR¯ÁV 2 ªÀµÀð 6 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ 16 ¢ªÀ¸À CªÀ¢ü PÀ¼É¢zÀÄÝ, ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PÀÈvÀåPÉÌ §¼À¹®è
JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÁPÁëzsÁgÀUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ EzÀĪÀgÉ«UÀÆ vÁªÁUÀ°Ã CxÀªÁ vÀªÀÄä £ÁåAiÀĪÁ¢UÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀªÁUÀ°
ºÁdgÁV ¸Á©ÃvÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀzÉà EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀjUÉ UÉÆwÛzÀÄÝ F PÀÈvÀå £ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ¯Éà ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀgÀÄ
ªÁºÀ£ÀzÀ §UÉÎ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà D¸ÀQÛ vÉÆÃj¸ÀzÉ EgÀĪÀ CA±ÀªÀÅ ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ ¸Á©ÃvÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ C®èzÉà d¥sÁÛVgÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀÅ E¯ÁSÁ
ªÀ±ÀzÀ°èAiÉÄà EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ vÀl¸ÀÜ ¹ÜwAiÀÄ°è ºÁUÉAiÉÄà ©lÖ°è ¥ÀæPÀÈwAiÀÄ ªÉÊ¥ÀjÃvÀåUÀ½UÀ£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV ºÁ¼ÁV ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ §gÀĪÀ gÁd¸ÀéPÉÌ zsÀPÉÌ
GAmÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ«gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄAiÀÄ ²ÃWÀæ «¯ÉêÁj zÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ ªÀ±À¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj
PÁAiÉÄÝ 1965 gÀ PÀ®A 43 (¹) CrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ AiÉÆÃUÀåªÉAzÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄ£ÀªÀjPÉAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ
F PɼÀPÀAqÀ DzÉñÀ
“DzÉñÀ”
Dgï.ªÉAPÀmÉÃ±ï ¥ÀzÀQ, ¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ DzÀ £Á£ÀÄ
oÁuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, CdÓA¥ÀÄgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ EªÀgÀ PÉæöÊA £ÀA.106/2010, ¢£ÁAPÀ:10-08-2010 gÀ°è ªÀ±À¥Àr¹PÉÆArgÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£À ¸ÀASÉå:
PÉJ:18.PÉ-7950 (J¯ï.JA.J¯ï ¦üæÃqÀªÀiï ¨ÉÊPï) ºÁUÀÆ gÁ¸ÁAiÀĤPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÉ ªÀiÁzÀj vÉUÉzÀÄ G½zÀ 8,460 °Ãlgï gÁd«¹Ì ªÀÄzÀåªÀ£ÀÄß
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ C§PÁj PÁAiÉÄÝ 1965 PÀ®A 43(J) CrAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ PÀ®A 43(©) CrAiÀİè C£ÀĸÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ
PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß dgÀÄV PÀ®A 43(¹) CrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ªÀÄÄlÄÖUÉÆÃ®Ä ºÁQPÉÆAqÀÄ DzÉò¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß EAzÀÄ CAzÀgÉ 27£Éà ¥sɧæªÀj 2013 gÀAzÀÄ ¨ÉgÀ¼ÀZÀÄÑUÁgÀjUÉ GRÛ¯ÉÃR£À PÉÆlÄÖ UÀtPÀAiÀÄAvÀæzÀ°è ¨ÉgÀ¼ÀaѹzÀ
£ÀAvÀgÀ vÀ¥ÀÄàUÀ¼À£ÀÄß w¢Ý ªÀÄÄPÀÛ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è WÉÆÃ¶¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
F DzÉñÀªÀÅ EA¢¤AzÀ 30 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À £ÀAvÀgÀ eÁjAiÀÄ°è §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
P.R. 221
¥Áæ¢üPÀÈvÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C§PÁj G¥À DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ,
aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Éè, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
wzÀÄÝ¥Àr
¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 13 J¯ïf¹:2013 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 05-03-2013.
DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 13 J¯ïf¹:2013 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:14-02-2012gÀ DzÉñÀ ¨sÁUÀzÀ°è£À µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå
(5)gÀ°è£À µÀgÀvÀÛ£ÀÄß PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ N¢PÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
“¸ËgÀ±ÀQÛ ¥ÁPïðUÁV ¨ÉÃPÁUÀĪÀ vÁAwæPÀvÉ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ºÁUÀÆ G¥ÀPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß GvÁࢸÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÀA¥À¤UÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄÄAzÉ §AzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ PÀA¥À¤UÀ½UÉ ¨ÉÃPÁUÀĪÀ eÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÉÄ|| ¸ÁVlgï ªÉAZÀgïì ¥ÉæöÊ °«ÄmÉqï EªÀgÀÄ G¥ÀUÀÄwÛUÉ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄïÉ
¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà PÁgÀtPÁÌV UÀÄwÛUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀgÀ¨sÁgÉ (not to alienate) ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ”
P.R. 222
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
ºÉZï.eÉ.®QëöäãÁgÁAiÀÄt,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw-3).
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå: PÀAE 100 J¯ïDgïJA:2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:12-02-2013.
ªÉÄ|| ªÉ¯ï¸ÀÖ£ï ¸ÉÆÃ¯Ágï PÀ£ÀßqÀ ¥ÉæöÊ.°., ªÀÄÄA¨ÉÊ EªÀjUÉ ªÉƼÀPÁ®ÆägÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, PÀ¸À¨Á ºÉÆÃ§½, £ÁUÀ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÀæ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉð
£ÀA.315/2gÀ°è 20.00 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ, ¸À.£ÀA.316/1 gÀ°è 40.00 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ, ¸À.£ÀA.316/2 gÀ°è 43.03 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÉƼÀPÁ®ÆägÀÄ
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
927
vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, zÉêÀ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÀæ ºÉÆÃ§½, ºÉÃgÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸À.£ÀA.34/3 gÀ°è 2.09 JPÀgÉ/ UÀÄAmÉ MlÄÖ 105.12 JPÀgÉ/UÀÄAmÉ PÀȶ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß
PÉÊUÁjPÁ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV CAzÀgÉ, ¸ËgÀ «zÀÄåvï WÀlPÀ ¸Áܦ¸ÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1961 gÀ PÀ®A 109(1)
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ (1974)gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 38-© ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 38-¹ gÀ°è£À µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀÆgÉʹzÀÄÝ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ
¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1961gÀ PÀ®A 63, 79J, 79© CxÀªÁ 80PÉÌ «£Á¬Äw ¤Ãr, PÀ®A 109 (1)gÀr F PɼÀPÀAqÀ µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ½UÉ M¼À¥ÀlÄÖ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ:-
1) AiÀiÁªÀ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß Rjâ¸À®Ä C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉAiÉÆÃ CzÉà GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß JgÀqÀÄ
ªÀµÀðzÉÆ¼ÀUÉ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F PÀÄjvÀAvÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ °TvÀªÁV ªÀiÁ»w
¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
2) F C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀƸÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ (1961)zÀ PÀ®A 109gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ «£Á¬Äw ªÀiÁvÀæªÁVzÀÄÝ, ¨ÉÃgÉ
PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁzÀ°è ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ PÁAiÉÄÝAiÀÄr CUÀvÀå PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
3) F «£Á¬Äw ¥ÀqÉzÀªÀgÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà µÉqÀÆå¯ï ¨ÁåAPï CxÀªÁ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ, PÀȶ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæ«ÄÃuÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¨ÁåAPï
MAzÀPÉÌ CxÀªÁ PÀA¥À¤ PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1956gÀ PÀ®A 3 gÀ°è ºÉýgÀĪÀAvÉ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 51 ¥ÉÃAiÀiïØ C¥ï µÉÃgÀÄ §AqÀªÁ¼À ºÉÆA¢zÀ gÁdå
¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ CxÀªÁ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¤AiÀÄAwævÀ CxÀªÁ JgÀqÀgÀ »rvÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀAWÀ/¸ÀA¸ÉÜ
MAzÀPÉÌ SÁvÀj ¤Ãr CqÀªÀiÁ£À ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÉ ºÉÆuÉ ªÀiÁr ¸Á® ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹ ¸ÀzÀj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢vÀ
GzÉÝñÀPÀÌ®èzÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ GzÉÝñÀPÉÌ §¼À¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è.
4) ¸ÀzÀj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ªÀåªÀ¸ÁAiÉÄÃvÀgÀ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV ¥ÀjªÀwð¹PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÁ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ (1964)zÀ PÀ®A 95gÀ
ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ f¯Áè¢üPÁjAiÀĪÀjAzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5) G¯ÉèÃTvÀ d«ÄãÀÄUÀ¼À°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÁAiÀÄð PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀ ªÉÆzÀ®Ä d«Ää£À «£Áå¸ÀPÉÌ £ÀUÀgÀ AiÉÆÃd£Á
E¯ÁSÉ/C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ/¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ½AzÀ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
6) D d«ÄãÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà £ÀUÀgÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ¹.r.¦/M.r.¦. ªÁå¦ÛAiÉÆ¼ÀUÉ §AzÀ°è ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
7) PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1969 gÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀAvÀºÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj d«ÄãÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀݰè
CzÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
8) ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ £ÀqɸÀĪÀ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¨sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
F
ªÉÄð£À
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼ÀÄ
G®èAWÀ£ÉAiÀiÁzÀ°è
FUÀ
¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ
C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ
jÃvÀå
gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¦vÀ ¨sÀÆ«ÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß IÄtªÀÄÄPÀÛªÁV ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ°è ¤»vÀ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
P.R. 223
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
©.JA.zÁPÁëAiÀÄtªÀÄä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ).
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå: Dgïr 63 J¯ïfªÉÊ 2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 29-01-2013.
£ÀªÀÄÆ£É-27
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ PÀ®A 68(1) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 94 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ WÉÆÃµÀuÉ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¸ÀévÁÛVgÀĪÀ ºÁUÀÆ PɼÀV£À C£ÀĸÀÆaAiÀÄ°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ ¥Àr¹zÀ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀéwÛ£À ¨sÁUÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ
CUÀvÀå«®èªÉAzÀÄ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
¥ÀæAiÀÄÄPÀÛ FUÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1964gÀ PÀ®A 68£Éà ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ (1)£Éà G¥À¥ÀæPÀgÀt¢AzÀ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ
C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ¸ÀéwÛ£À ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÁUÀªÀÅ ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ CUÀvÀå«®èªÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ s¸ÀéwÛ£À ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÁUÀzÀ°è CxÀªÁ CzÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀgÀ ºÁUÀÆ J¯Áè ªÀåQÛUÀ¼À ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼ÀÄ PÉÆ£ÉUÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÉÝAzÀÄ GzÉÝò¹
F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ WÉÆÃ¶¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ºÀQÌ£À eÉÆvÉUÉ ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÀéwÛ£À ¸ÀzÀj ¨sÁUÀzÀ°è CxÀªÁ CzÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É »vÁ¸ÀQÛAiÀÄļÀî CxÀªÁ ºÀPÀÄ̼Àî CxÀªÁ
F GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ C£ÀåxÁ ¨sÁ¢vÀ£ÁUÀĪÀ/¥ÀæwPÀÆ® ¥ÀjuÁªÀÄPÉÌ M¼ÀUÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ«gÀĪÀ EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà »vÁ¸ÀQÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ
vÉÆA¨sÀvÀÄÛ (90) ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ ¸ÀzÀj GzÉÝñÀzÀ §UÉÎ vÀªÀÄä DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CAvÀºÀ »vÁ¸ÀQÛ CxÀªÁ ºÀQÌ£À £ÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀPÉÌ PÉèêÀÄÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁzÀ
ªÉƧ®UÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ °TvÀ gÀÆ¥ÀzÀ°è w½¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄÄPÀÛ DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀj
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è G¥À§A¢ü¹gÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÀAvÀzÀ°è ¥Àj²Ã°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
928
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
C£ÀĸÀÆa
gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ ¨sÁUÀ EvÁå¢ EgÀĪÀ UÁæªÀÄ
ºÉƸÀºÉƼÀ®Ä
vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ
PÉ.Dgï.¥ÉÃmÉ
f¯Éè
ªÀÄAqÀå
PÀmÉÖAiÀÄ ¨sÁUÀzÀ ªÀtð£É
¸ÀPÁðj PÀmÉÖ ¸À.£ÀA.361
gÀ¸ÉÛ ªÉÆzÀ¯ÁzÀÄzÀgÀ ¨sÁUÀ CxÀªÁ ¨sÁUÀzÀ ªÀtð£É
¸À.£ÀA 46 gÀ°è£À 8-00 JPÀgÉ
gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ ¨sÁUÀ CxÀªÁ ¨sÁUÀUÀ¼À ¸Àj¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ «¹ÛÃtð ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄÃgÉ, MlÄÖ 8-00 JPÀgÉ
¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ gÀ¸ÉÛ: ©Ã¢:UÀ°è:zÁj: CxÀªÀ CzÀgÀ ¨sÁUÀ:-
¥ÀƪÀð
¸ÀPÁðj UÉÆÃªÀiÁ¼À
¥À²ÑªÀÄ
PÉÆªÉÄäÃgÀºÀ½î UÀr
GvÀÛgÀ
¸ÀPÁðj UÉÆÃªÀiÁ¼À
zÀQët
PÉÆ¼ÀZÉäÃgÀÄ
±ÀÄ¢ÞÃPÀgÀtPÉÌ
¤ÃrgÀĪÀ
EzÉÃ
£ÀA:
d«ÄãÀÄ, F ªÀÄzsÉå EgÀĪÀ JAlÄ (8-00) JPÀgÉ
¥ÀæzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß WÀ£À vÁådåªÀ¸ÀÄÛ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉUÁV ¤ÃqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.
P.R. 224
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.²ªÀ°AUÀAiÀÄå,
¦ÃoÁ¢üPÁj,
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ªÀÄA-2).
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated 20-12-2001 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding
sand over an area of 8.09 Hectares in Kuruvatti village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary
district for a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 20-12-2001 in No.243 AML 2001.
2.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding sand over an area of 8-09 hectares in Kuruvatti village,
Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for a period of 10 years from 23-12-1992 vide ML No.2166. The said lease came to be expired on
22-12-2002. The lessee has made renewal application on 20-12-2001.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that
all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Govind.B.Ron
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the
samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies
No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose.
He further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that
the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to
produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
929
1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability
of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige
Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated
31-03-2011 in revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to
pass a fresh order as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the
technical note on the “Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the
note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said
location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.
Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy
was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the WP
No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
ORDER No.DMG/MLS/243 AML 2001/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 243 AML 2001 dated 20-12-2001 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron
for moulding sand over an area of 8.09 hectares in Kuruvatti village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district.
P.R. 269
DIRECTOR.
930
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated 11-08-2011 of Sri.H.B.Patil for moulding sand
over an area of 80 acres in Kotihal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of
20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 11-08-2011 in No.556 AML 2011.
2.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.H.B.Patil for moulding sand over an area of 80 acres in Kotihal village, Ranebennur
taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years from 14-08-1992 vide ML No.2152. The said lease came to be expired on 13-08-2012.
The lessee has made renewal application on 11-08-2011.
2 The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that
all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.H.B.Patil appeared on
16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the samples
from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies
No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose.
He further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that
the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to
produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR
1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability
of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of 8 sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said
location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.
Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
931
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.
The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation
has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.
District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the
sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the
Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of
Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding
sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
ORDER NO.DMG/MLS/556 AML 11/12-13 DATED 5TH FEBRUARY 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of powers conferred under Government
Notification No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.556 AML 2011 dated 11-08-2011 of
Sri.H.B.Patil for moulding sand over an area of 80.00 acres in Kotihal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district.
P.R. 270
DIRECTOR.
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated 08-11-2006 of Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi for moulding
sand over an area of 12.94 Hectares in Nelawagalu Village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri
district for a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 08-11-2006 in No.1089 AML 2006.
2.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï//2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi for moulding sand over an area of 12.94 hectares in Nelawagalu
village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 20 years from 20-11-1987 vide ML No.2055. The said lease came to be
expired on 19-11-2007. The lessee has made renewal application on 08-11-2006.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that
all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of her case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted her written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected
the samples from the leased area in her absence. She further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the
entire Tungabhadra river sand the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is
stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of
the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of
932
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this
regard and also stated that the Central Government, Department of Mines have classified the minerals as minor and major depending
upon its end use not basically on the chemical analysis and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said
location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.
Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.
The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has
been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District
Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand
mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri
district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41190/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/1089 AML 2006/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 1089 AML 2006 dated 08-11-2006 of
Smt.B.M.Vishalakshi for moulding sand over an area of 12.94 Hectares in Nelawagalu village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district.
P.R. 268
DIRECTOR.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
933
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Premature termination of mining lease bearing No.2218 sanctioned to of Sri.Babulal Khan
Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres in Irani Village of Rannebennur
Taluk, Haveri District for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 30-09-96. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your application dated 13-01-1992 in No.4 AML 92.
2.
This office letter No.DMG/AML4/AML 92/20569, dated 28-02-1996.
3.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
4.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease application was filed by Sri.Allabaksi Bahadur Khan Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres
in Irani Village of Rannebennur Taluk, Haveri District for a period of 20 years on 16-01-92. As per Sri.Babulal Mahadi’s representation
dated 12-05-95 submitted the death certificate of Sri.Allabaksh Mahadi and requested to consider him as legal heir.
By this office letter dated 28-02-1996 cited under ref (2) Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi is considered as legal heir of Late Allabaksh
Bahadur Khan Mahadi under the provisions of Rule 25A of MCR 1960.
A mining lease was executed in favour of Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres in Irani
Village of Rannebennur Taluk, Haveri District on 30-09-96 for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 30-09-96 vide ML No.2218.
2. Sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral technologist of this office. The analysis proved
that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1
specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay. Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be
classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that
all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. A notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation
of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written
arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the samples from the leased area in his absence. He
further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri
and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand
available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of the Department
conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay,
hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this regard and also stated
that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR 1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to
mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige
Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the
934
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
said location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres
only. Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for
foundry application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate
grant of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy
was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the WP
No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/4 AML 92/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore do hereby recommend the Government for premature
termination of mining lease bearing No.2218 sanctioned to Sri.Babulal Khan Mahadi for moulding sand over an area of 3.00 acres in
Irani village of Rannebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 30-09-96 under section 4A of MM (D & R) Act 1957.
P.R. 267
DIRECTOR.
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated 11-05-1998 of Sri.Anjanappa Hanumappa
Gadad for moulding sand over an area of 20.23 hectares in Pathepura and Kusugatti
villages, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 11-05-1998 in No.31 AML 1998.
2.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No.– UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Anjanappa Hanumappa Gaddad for moulding sand over an area of 20.23 hectares in
Pathepura and Kusagatti villages, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 18-05-1989 vide ML No.2088.
The said lease period came to be expired on 17-05-1999. Further the lessee has made application on 11-05-1998 seeking renewal
of ML No.2088.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that
all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri. Anjanappa
Hanumappa Gadad appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written statements, wherein it is stated that the lease is in operation
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
935
till today. The said lease was granted after verification of sand sample which is approved by Government of India, Indian Bureau of
Mines and he has fulfilled and complied all the terms and conditions as imposed on him and the sand deposit in Tungabhadra river bed
varies every year. He further stated that the moulding sand deposited in river bed is used for industries purpose only. The authorities
under the Act, have stopped issue of permit to transport of the moulding sand. Hence it has resulted in illegal mining and loss to the
State Exchequer. He further stated that the authorities have no power to terminate the lease for the reasons stated in the notice and
requested to drop the proceedings.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
8. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said
location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.
Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy
was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/31 AML 1998/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 31 AML 1998 dated 11-05-1998 of Sri. Anjanappa
Hanumappa Gadad.
P.R. 271
DIRECTOR.
936
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 14-07-2004 of Smt.Channamma, Legal heir of
H.G.Katenahalli for moulding sand over an area of 115.00 acres in Haranagiri village,
Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 14-07-2004 in No. 372 AML 04.
2.
This office letter No.DMG/MLS/ML-1982/08-09/ 2331-32, dated 25-08-2008.
3.
This office notice No.DMG/MLS/372 AML 04/RML 1982/2008-09/1034, dated: 05-05-2009.
4.
Deputy Commissioner, Haveri letter No.Bhoomi/ Vahi/31/09-10, dated : 02-07-09.
5.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.
6.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.
1.
A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.H.G.Katenahalli for moulding sand over an area of 115 acres Haranagiri village,
Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district for a period of 20 years from 30-07-1985 vide ML No.1982. The said lease came to be expired on
29-07-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 14-07-2004.
2.
The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3.
The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that
all the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4.
A per this officer letter cited under ref (2) Smt.Channamma W/o Late H.G.Katenahalli is considered as legal representative
as per rule 25A(1) of MCR 1960 with regard to renewal application.
5.
A notice was issued under rule 26(1) of MCR 1960 to the applicant cited under ref (3) to submit a statutory clearance of
IBM approved mining plan, MoEF clearance, KSPCB consent, arrears clearance certificate from Senior Geologist and informed to pay
arrears of royalty Rs.1,49,151/- within 30 days failing which action will be initiated to cancel the renewal application.
6.
The Deputy Commissioner, Haveri in his report cited under ref (4) submitted revenue report recommending to renew the
mining lease of 1982.
7.
The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of her case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Smt.Channamma
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted her written arguments, requesting to renew the mining lease in her favour because she has
paid all arrears and dead rent and she has prayed that her husband was obtained mining lease and her husband expired due to heart
attack and she has two handicapped sons and she is illiterate. This is the only income for their livelihood and prayed to renew the
mining lease.
8.
Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad districts was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
9.
As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
Taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code
guidelines and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical
test following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
937
10.
Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said
location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.
Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
11.
ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
12.
Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.
The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation
has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.
District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the
sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the
Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of
Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding
sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/372 AML 04/12-13 Dated : 4th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI 3
MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.372 AML 04 (RML 1982) dated 14-07-2004 of
Smt.Channamma, legal heir of Late H.G.Katenahalli for moulding sand over an area of 115.00 acres in Haranagiri village, Ranebennur
taluk, Haveri district.
P.R. 272
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding
sand over an area of 5.26 Hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for
a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 27-09-2004 in No.946 AML 04.
2.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding sand over an area of 5.26 hectares in Mylar village,
Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for a period of 10 years from 15-09-1995 vide ML No.2200. The said lease came to be expired on
14-09-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 27-09-2004.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
938
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Govind.B.Ron
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the
samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies
No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose.
He further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that
the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to
produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR
1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability
of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige
Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated: 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River
Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location
put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further
according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their
analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.
In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was
incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T. to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/946 AML 04/12-13 , Dated : 5th February 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
939
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.946 AML 04 dated 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for
moulding sand over an area of 5.26 hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district.
P.R. 273
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 04-09-2001 of Sri.Honnappa Hanumappa
Kudrihal for moulding sand over an area of 4.05 Hectares in Kancharaghatta village,
Haveri taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years. – reg.
Read : 1.
Your renewal application dated 04-09-2001 in No. 170 AML 01.
2.
This office notification no.DMG.MLS/RML 2156/ 06-07/1388-94, dated 05-05-2007.
3.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
4.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated: 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri. Honnappa Hanumappa Kudrihal for moulding sand over an area of 4-05 hectares in
Kancharaghatta Village, Haveri taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 23-09-1992 vide ML No.2156. The said lease came
to be expired on 22-09-2002. The lessee has made renewal application on 04-09-2001 for a further period of 10 years.
2. The said application was referred to the Deputy Commissioner, Haveri for opinion. The Deputy Commissioner, Haveri in his
letter dated 08-11-2002 has stated that the area applied is not reserved for any public purpose and recommended for extraction of
moulding sand. The Joint Director, Bellary in his letter dated 22-07-2003 has sent the spot inspection report, wherein its is sated that in
the applied area, ordinary sand available from 1 to 2 feet and availability of moulding sand is not confirmed and sand samples has to be
analysed. The applicant has not submitted any of the document regarding supply of moulding sand to the foundries.
3. The Senior Geologist, Dharwad has sent technical report wherein he has stated that the sand exploited and consumed for
constructional work in the nearby cities and towns and recommended for rejection. The applicant has preferred
WP No.42002/2003 in the High Court of Karnataka. The Hon’ble High Court in its order dated 21-02-2007 was pleased to dispose of
this writ petition. The operative portion of the order is as follows:
“The respondent authority is directed to consider the application of the petitioner for renewal, if such
application is pending consideration on the basis of the report submitted by the Joint Director and to dispose of
the same within three months from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with law.”
4. Further notification issued in No.DMG/MLS/RML/2156/06-07/1388-94, dated 05-05-2007 renewing the lease for a period of
10 years w.e.f. 23-09-2002 over an area of 10.00 acres in Kancharaghatta village, Haveri taluk, Dharwad district for moulding sand.
But lease deed has not executed within the stipulated time as required under Rule 31 of MC Rules 1960.
5. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
6. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
7. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Inspite of receiving the
hearing notice, the applicant remained absent. Hence, the matter was decided based on the material available on records.
8. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
9. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
940
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
10. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra
River Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said
location put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only.
Further according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant
of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
11. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
12. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.
The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation
has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.
District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the
sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the
Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of
Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding
sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/170 AML 01/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby revoke the notification No.DMG/MLS/RML/2156/06-07/ 1388-94, dated : 05-05-2007
issued in favour of Sri.H.H.Kudrihal for moulding sand over an area of 10.00 acres in Kancharaghatta village, Haveri taluk, Haveri district
for a period of 10 years w.e.f. 23-09-2002 as per Rule 31 of MC Rules 1960.
P.R. 274
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 17-08-2001 of Sri.Amanulla Khan for
moulding sand over an area of 4.05 Hectares in Kodiyal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri
district for a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 17-08-2001 in No.152 AML 2001.
2.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Amanulla Khan for moulding sand over an area of 4.05 hectares in Kodiyal village,
Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 01-10-1992 vide ML No.2157. The said lease came to be expired on
30-09-2002. The lessee has made renewal application on 17-08-2001.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
941
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Amanulla Khan
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the
samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies
No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He
further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the
sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to
produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR
1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability
of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River
Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location
put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further
according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for
foundry application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate
grant of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their
analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.
In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was
incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
942
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/152 AML 2001/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013.
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No. 152 AML 2001dated 17-08-2001 of Sri.Amanulla Khan
for moulding sand over an area of 4.05 hectares in Kodiyal village, Ranebennur taluk, Haveri district.
P.R. 275
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding
sand over an area of 6.01 Hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for
a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 27-09-2004 in No.948 AML 04.
2.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.Govind.B.Ron for moulding sand over an area of 6.01 hectares in Mylar village,
Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district for a period of 10 years from 15-09-1995 vide ML No.2199. The said lease came to be expired on
14-09-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 27-09-2004.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.Govind.B.Ron
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the
samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand in the district of Haveri and Bellary the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies
No.104 and in the report it is stated that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He
further stated that Geologist of the Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the
sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2) and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to
produce the document in this regard and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR
1960 and having permitted the lessee all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability
of moulding sand in Tungabhadra river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige Village to Hammige
Village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
943
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River
Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location
put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further
according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for ordinary
sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their
analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.
In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was
incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T. to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/948 AML 04/12-13, Dated : 4th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification
No.CI 3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.948 AML 04 dated : 27-09-2004 of Sri.Govind.B.Ron
for moulding sand over an area of 6.01 Hectares in Mylar village, Huvinahadagali taluk, Bellary district.
P.R. 278
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 19-01-2011 of Sri.B.Jagadish for moulding sand
over an area of 18.61 hectares in Rajanahalli village, Harihara taluk, Chitradurga district for a
period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 19-01-2011 in No.87 AML 2011.
2.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.
3.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.
1. Originally a mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.B.Revanna Siddappa for moulding sand over an area of 32.38 hectares in
Rajanahalli village, Harihara taluk, Chitradurga district for a period of 10 years from 20-01-1982 vide ML No.1803. Further first renewal
of the lease granted on 14-10-97 for a period of 20 years w.e.f. 20-01-92 over an area of 18.61 hectares vide ML No.2231. The lessee
i.e., Sri.B.Revanna Siddappa demised on 15-05-2010. The lease came to be expired on 19-01-2012. Further Sri.B.Jagadish stated to
be the legal heir of the deceased lessee has made second renewal application on 19-01-2011.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
944
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
4. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.B.Jagadish appeared
on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the samples
from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is stated
that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of the
Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2)
and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this regard and
also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR 1960 and having permitted the lessee
all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability of moulding sand in Tungabhadra
river bed.
5. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
6. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
7. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River
Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location
put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further
according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant of
lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
8. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
9. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011.
The policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation
has been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department.
District Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the
sand mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the
Haveri district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of
Mines and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding
sand wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
945
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/87 AML 2011/12-13, Dated : 4th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI
3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby reject the renewal application No.87 AML 2011 dated : 19-01-2011 of Sri.B. Jagadish for
moulding sand over an area of 18.61 hectares in Rajanahalli village, Harihara taluk, Chitradurga district.
P.R. 279
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration of renewal application dated : 25-11-2004 of Sri.D.Yamunappa for moulding sand
over an area of 12.15 hectares in Sarathi village, Harihara taluk, Davanagere district for a period
of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 25-11-2004 in No.1358 AML 04
2.
This office notification No.DMG/MLS/1358 AML 04/ RML-2207/08-09/281-287, dated 16-04-2009.
3.
The Senior Geologist, Davanagere in his letter No. SG(M)/DMG/Sand Mining/ 10-11/1659,
dated 13-08-2010.
4.
This office letter No.DMG/1358 AML 04//RML 2207/10-11/9886, dated 05-01-2011.
5.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated 02-07-2012.
6.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/3273-3297, dated 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri.D.Yamunappa for moulding sand over an area of 12.05 hectares in Sarathi Village,
Harihara Taluk, Davanagere District for a period of 10 years from 07-12-1995 vide ML No.2207. The said lease came to be expired on
06-12-2005. The lessee has made renewal application on 25-11-2004. A grant notification dated 16-04-2009 cited under ref (2)
sanctioning renewal of mining lease for moulding sand over an area of 30 acres in Tungabhadra river bed of Sarathi village,
Harihara taluk, Davanagere district for a period of 20 year w.e.f. 07-12-2005.
2. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. A Chemical analysis of the sand sample was carriedout in this office laboratory and the analysis report
reads as follows:
ML No.
SiO2%
% Clay Content
% of Recovery
Remarks
2207
86.48
0.72
48.11
Ordinary sand
The Senior Geologist, Davanagere in their letter cited under ref (3) has opined the available sand in the leased area is ordinary
sand instead of moulding sand. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5%. The IS specification for natural
moulding sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
3. Based on the chemical analysis report a notice cited under ref (4) was issued under rule 26(1) of MCR 1960 calling the
applicant why the renewal application should not be rejected based on the chemical analysis report and non payment of EPF and also
informed to submit written statement within 30 days.
4. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
5. The matter of renewal was pending for long time and hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear
before this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.D.Yamunappa
was present during the course of hearing and submitted his written arguments. He has stated that the available mineral in the leased
area is moulding sand and quoted the provisions of Rule 70 of mineral concession rules 1960. He further stated that the major mineral
can be used as minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of Mineral Concession Rules 1960 and IBM has approved the mining plan for moulding
sand and requested to execute the renewal mining lease deed in his favour.
6. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
946
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
7. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
8. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River
Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location
put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres. Further
according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. At any rate grant/renewal/continuation of lease for moulding sand to any extent is likely to overlap or interfere with the area
of quarrying lease for ordinary sand.
9. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
10. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and
their analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole
issue. In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The
policy was incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has
been included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District
Sand Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand
mining and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri
district the sand cost is about Rs.400/- per M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines
and Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- per M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- per M.T. Also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable
rates to the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast
ordinary sand deposits, only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the WP
No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/1358 AML 04/12-13. Dated : 12th March 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI
3 MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby revoke the grant notification No.DMG/MLS/1358 AML 04/RML-2207/08-09/281-287, dated 16-
04-2009 of Sri.D.Yamunappa for moulding sand over an area of 12.15 hectares in Sarathi village, Harihara taluk, Davanagere district for
a period of 20 years w.e.f. 07-12-2005 as per Rule 31 of MC Rules 1960.
P.R. 280
DIRECTOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY, BANGALORE
Sub:
Consideration
of
renewal
application
dated:
09-04-1999
of
Sri.
Halanagouda
Channanagouda Channagoudar for moulding sand over an area of 8.49 Hectares in Irani
village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 20 years. – reg.
Read: 1.
Your renewal application dated 09-04-1999 in No.67 AML 99.
2.
This office notification no.DMG.MLS/RML 2156/ 06-07/1388-94, dated 05-05-2007.
3.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/2012-13/2650-84, dated : 02-07-2012.
4.
This office notice No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/UÀUÀıÁ/ªÀiË.¸ÁåAqï/ 2012-13/3273-3297, dated : 23-07-2012.
1. A mining lease was sanctioned to Sri. Halanagouda Channanagouda Channagoudar for moulding sand over an area of
8.49 hectares in Irani village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for a period of 10 years from 21-04-1990 vide ML No.2108A. The said
lease came to be expired on 20-04-2000. The lessee has made renewal application on 09-04-1999 for a further period of 20 years.
¨sÁUÀ 3
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
947
2. The Senior Geologist, Haveri in his letter No.GaBhuE/HiBhuVi/Maralu/ 2009-10/968, dated 25-02-2010 has sent the list of
sand sample chemical analysis. As per analysis report:
SiO2%
Al2O3%
Fe2O3%
TiO2%
% Clay Content
% Recovery
87.91
7.71
3.19
0.10
0.20
60.71
Sri.N.B.Manjunath in his letter dated 23-11-2010 while enclosing the copy of the death certificate and will executed by
Sri.Halanagouda Channanagouda Channagoudar stating that he is the foster daughter’s son and during the life time Sri. Halanagouda
Channanagouda Channagoudar has executed a will on 05-06-2009 and his grand father demised on 14-04-2010 and requested to
consider him as legal representative as per Rule 25 of MC Rules 1960.
3. The said application was processed and sand samples from the area were collected and analyzed by the mineral
technologist of this office. The analysis proved that the clay content in the sand is less than 5% the IS specification for natural moulding
sand (IS 3343-1965) vide page 4 Para 5.1 specified that the moulding sand of different grades should contain 5% to 20% clay.
Therefore, the sand available in this area cannot be classified under natural moulding sand.
4. The geological studies No.104 is published by the Department of Mines and Geology in the year 1975. It establishes that all
the sand deposits in Tungabhadra course in the surveyed area have total reserves of 1047405 tonnes. This sand can be used for
general constructions, filter beds, grinding and polishing and foundries. The classification has not been made due to non-availability of
resources (Para 15.4 page No.18 of study report). It is also fact that the sand deposit based on parameters like grain size, shape,
specific gravity of grains and velocity of stream, the change in quality is also expected.
5. The matter of renewal was pending for long time hence notice was issued to the applicant on 02-07-2012 to appear before
this authority on 23-07-2012 for making presentation of his case and the matter was adjourned to 16-08-2012. Sri.N.B.Manjunath
appeared on 16-08-2012 and submitted his written arguments, wherein it is stated that the officers of this Department have collected the
samples from the leased area in his absence. He further stated that the Department have conducted the chemical analysis of the entire
Tungabhadra river sand the same has been published by this Department in the Geological studies No.104 and in the report it is stated
that sand available can be used for both construction purpose and also for industrial purpose. He further stated that Geologist of the
Department conducted the chemical analysis of the Tungabhadra river sand and discovered that the sand contains 90% of Silica (SiO2)
and 2% clay, hence it was ordinary sand and it is very much necessary for the Department to produce the document in this regard
and also stated that the major mineral can be used for minor mineral under Rule 27(o) of MCR 1960 and having permitted the lessee
all these years to mine ordinary sand, renewal cannot be refused on the ground of non-availability of moulding sand in Tungabhadra
river bed.
6. Availability percentage of moulding sand in Tungabhadra River Bed stretch from Konanathambige village to Hammige
village stretch between Bellary and Dharwad district was the subject matter of WP No.16119/97, 49376/04, 41990/11 and connected
revision petitions before the Central Mines Tribunal pursuant to the Central Mines Tribunal order No.270/2011 dated 31-03-2011 in
revision application No.13/1/2011-RC-1 this authority on 12-12-2011 had addressed a letter to the Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science requesting specific opinion about the kind of sand to enable this authority to pass a fresh order
as per the Central Mines Tribunal. The Indian Institute of Science in their letter dated 13-06-2012 furnished the technical note on the
“Natural Moulding Sand for use in Foundries” based on the test reports forwarded by this authority. The gist of the note is as follows:
7. As many as 30 sand samples collected from different locations in Tungabhadra river beds of Nadiharalalli, Irani, Hirebidiri,
Konanatambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli, Chikkakuruvathi, Chandapuri and Nasipura villages of Ranibennur
taluk, Kanchanagatti, Havanur villages of Haveri taluk tested by Department of Mines and Geology by following IS 1918 Code guidelines
and by Indian Bureau of Mines Laboratories by following chemical analysis process were tested to ascertain percentage of “Natural
Moulding Sand for use in foundries”. Based on percentage of clay content and grain size distribution ascertained from physical test
following IS 1918 code guidelines and percentage of SiO2 (Silica) ascertained from chemical analysis samples of Konanatambige,
Somalapur, Medleri and Hiladahalli were found fit to classify/ categories as moulding sand for foundry use / applications. Whereas the
procedure adopted by IBM laboratories for assessing sand samples for their suitability as moulding sand does not confirm to the IS code
(IS 3343 and IS 1918) specifications and guidelines. Analytical results of sand samples generated by the Indian Bureau of Mines
laboratories (given in Table 2) cannot be considered for examining their suitability as foundry sand following the guidelines of Indian
Standards Codes (IS 3343 and IS 1918 specifications.)
8. Seven samples sent by the Department to Indian Institute of Science correspond to different locations of Tungabhadra River
Bed from Konanathambige, Somalapura, Medleri, Udagatti, Belur, Hiladahalli the area of moulding sand identified in the said location
put together is 50 acres. One single largest block in the said area is 30 acres and another single largest block is 20 acres only. Further
according to test report of Indian Institute of Science samples from Belur locations do not reveal moulding sand fit for foundry
application. In this view of the matter extent of single largest block of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to be reduced. At any rate grant
948
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ ªÉÄà 9, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 3
of lease for moulding sand to an extent of 30 acres or 20 acres is likely to overlap or interfere with the area of quarrying lease for
ordinary sand.
9. ISI specification for natural moulding sand (IS 1387-1959) illustrates that the occurrences of natural moulding sand
deposists may be one foot to five feet in thickness. The sand deposits are recovered from major rivers of Karnataka such as Cauvery,
Tungabhadra, Krishna, Kabini, Karidra, etc., the minor rivers for the purpose of moulding sand samples were collected from all the
existing mining leases granted in Tungabhadra river bed for evaluation of moulding sand deposits. On chemical analysis it is found,
almost all the samples indicated that they come/fall under ordinary sand category.
10. Therefore grant of lease for moulding sand is impractical and not in public interest. The details of samples and their
analysis report is enclosed as Annexure-1. Apart from the technical aspects, there is one another bigger dimension to the whole issue.
In pursuance of several Government decisions, Karnataka State Sand Policy was framed and notified on 29/01/2011. The policy was
incorporated in KMMCR – 1994 vide amendment dated 2/7/2011. A separate chapter on sand mining and regulation has been
included. As per the sand policy and KMMCR, the sand mining in the entire State is done by Public Works Department. District Sand
Monitoring Committee under the chairmanship of Deputy Commissioner has been constituted to regulate and monitor the sand mining
and related issues. This Committee also decides the rate at which sand will be sold from PWD blocks/stockyards. In the Haveri district
the sand cost is about Rs.400/- M.T. The entire money earned through sale of sand is deposited in the Department of Mines and
Geology revenue head of account. Therefore, in the same area where largest available quantity is ordinary sand, moulding sand
wherever available is also available only in pockets. Besides sale of ordinary sand yields revenue of about Rs.400/- M.T to the
Government whereas lessee would have paid a royalty of only Rs.30/- and also ordinary sand is made available at reasonable rates to
the Public / Government civil works. Allocating mining leases on large river beds with meager moulding sand deposits and vast ordinary
sand deposits only encourages illegal ordinary sand mining, loss of Government revenue and not in public interest.
11. Sri.N.B.Manjunath vide letter dated 27-04-2012 enclosed consent letter of Sri.Chandrappa Halanagouda Channagoudar for
transfer of ML in favour of Sri.N.B.Manjunath. But in the geniological tree/pedigree produced by the applicant not revealed the name of
Sri.N.B.Manjunath.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances I proceed to pass the following order subject to the final orders of the
WP No.41990/2011 filed by Smt.Jyothi Manjula V/s State before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore:
Order No.DMG/MLS/67 AML 99/12-13, Dated : 5th February 2013
I, H.R.Srinivasa, IAS, Director of Mines and Geology, Bangalore in exercise of conferred under Government Notification No.CI 3
MMN 95, dated 27-05-1995 do hereby rejected the renewal application No.67 AML 99, dated 09-04-1999 of Sri. Halanagouda
Channanagouda Channagoudar for moulding sand over an area of 8.49 hectares in Irani village, Ranebennur taluk, Dharwad district for
a period of 20 years.
P.R. 276
DIRECTOR
¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, WÀlPÀ-2, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ