RNI No. KARBIL/2001/47147
gÁdåzÀ «zsÉÃAiÀÄPÀUÀ¼À ªÀÄvÀ Û
C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzsÁåzÉñ
ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ±Á¸À£À§zÀÞ
¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÁUÀÆ
¸ÀASÉå : ¹M 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À C¢ü¤
ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £
ªÀÄAqÀ½UÉ ²æà J¸ï. gÀ«, ªÀiÁf «zsÁ£À ¥Àj
¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ£ÁßV F PÀÆqÀ¯Éà eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ºÁ
P.R. 438
No: RD 14
The draft of the following rules f
Karnataka proposes to make in exercise of p
Act-12 of 1964) in Notification No. RD 143
inviting objections or suggestion from all the
official gazette.
And whereas, the said Gazette was
And whereas, no objections and
powers confirmed by the section 197 Karna
hereby makes the following Rules namely :-
1.
Title and Commencement :-
(1) These rules may be calle
(2) They shall come into forc
¸ÀA¥ÀÄl 148
Volume 148
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀÄ
Bangalore, Thursda
(2161)
¨sÁUÀ 4J
vÀÄÛ CªÀÅUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ¥Àj²Ã®£Á ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀg
±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÉÃAzÀæzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁdåzÀ ±Á¸À£ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ
zÀÞ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁeÁåAUÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ gÁ
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ ªÀiÁrzÀ ¤
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
7 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2013, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 26-07-2013
¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1959gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 28J G¥À ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 4©)(1)gÀ ªÉÄÃ
£ÀUÀgÀ, UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁªÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ f¯Áè PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¨ÁåA
jµÀvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ, “±ÀA¨sÀÄ ¤ªÁ¸À” 1£Éà ªÁqïð, PÀ£ÀPÀ¥ÀÄgÀ, gÁª
ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ £ÁªÀĤzÉÃð±À£À ªÀiÁr
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀÄ
f.J¸ï. gÀªÀÄ
«±ÉõÀ PÀvÀðªÁå¢üPÁj
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ dAn P
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E
REVENUE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION
43 Bhudasa 2012, Bangalore, Dated : 26-07-2013.
further to amend the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules-196
powers conferred by Section 197(1) of the Karnataka Land
Bhudasa 2012 dated : 12-02-2013 published in Karnataka
e persons likely to be affected thereby, within 30 days from
s made available on 11-04-2013.
suggestions have been received by the Government. Now
ataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964),
Rules
-
ed “The Karnataka Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 2013”
ce from the date of publication in the official Gazette.
ªÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013 (¨sÁzÀæ¥ÀzÀ 21, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1
ay, September 12, 2013 ( Bhadrapada 21, Shaka Va
gÀ¢UÀ¼ÀÄ, gÁdåzÀ
ÃgÉUÉ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ
gÁdå¥Á®gÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÀ
¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
.
gÉUÉ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
APï, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EzÀgÀ DqÀ½vÀ
ªÀÄ£ÀUÀgÀ f¯Éè-562117 EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß
rzÉ.
¸ÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
ÀÄtgÉrØ
ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀzÀ¤«ÄvÀÛ
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
¯ÁSÉ.
66, which the Government of
Revenue Act-1964 (Karnataka
a Gazette-dated : 11-04-2013
the date of publication in the
w, therefore in exercise of the
the Government of Karnataka
”
1935)
arsha 1935)
¸ÀAaPÉ 37
Issue 37
2162
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
2.
Amendment of Rule 46A to 46K :
(i)
The existing rule 46A 46K shall be deleted :
(ii) Instead following rule “46A to 46K” shall be substituted.
Insertion of new rules :
“46A, Qualifications, experience and age for obtaining licence as a licenced surveyor
(1) The Qualification and experience for the purpose of issue of a licence under section 18A, shall be as follows :-
(i)
“Successful completion of job oriented course in land and city survey conducted by the Directorate of Vocational
Education in Karnataka, or
(ii) Diploma in Civil Engineering granted by the board of Technical Education in Karnataka or Equivalent Qualification ;”
or
(iii) A Bachelors degree in civil engineering from an university established by the law in India” or
(iv) A pass in II PUC/12th Standard Examination conducted by CBSE or ICSE with science subject and must have
secured not less than sixty percent in mathematics or
(v) A pass in ITI in Survey trade conducted by Department of Employment and Training, Government of Karnataka.
SELECTION PROCESS :
Department of Survey Settlement and Land Records shall conduct competative examination for the applicants who have
applied for licence, in 2 subjects viz., (1) General knowledge (2) specific paper related to licence, each paper carrying maximum of 100
marks. Selection will be made on the merit obtained in the competative exam.
(vi)
Persons who have worked in the Survey Settlement Department or Survey of India or Public Sector undertakings or
Private Organization and who have served for not less than ten years involving Land Survey work and who are not in
Service on account of Resignation or voluntary retirement or superannuation shall be also be eligible to apply for
licence.
(2) All persons who have completed 18 years of age but not completed 65 years of age on the last date prescribed for
receipt of applications for issue of licence and who are physically fit to discharge the duties assigned to them are eligible
to apply for licence.
46 B. Training :
Persons who are selected tentatively through exam on merit among the persons who have applied for issue of licence have
to compulsorily undergo a training for a period not less than three months conducted by the department of Survey Settlement and Land
Records at the Departmental Training Institute at Mysore & Gulbarga at the cost of the trainees as notified by the
Commissioner/Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records and those who successfully completes the training shall be issued
licence.
46 C. Licence :
Licence shall be issued by the Commissioner/Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records, Bangalore to the successful
candidates in the examination conducted by Department of Survey, Settlement and Land Records on payment of licence fees as
notified by the Commissioner/Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records. The licence shall be for a period of 3 years subject to
renewal.
Period of licence once issued shall be extended by renewal on an application to be made by the licence holder within one
month from the date of expiry of period of licence, before the Deputy Director of Land Records of the respective Districts along with the
fee as notified by the Commissioner/Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records.
Renewal of licence shall be subject to satisfactory service rendered by the licenced surveyor which is assessed by the
concerned Deputy Director of Land Records of the District or through continuous evaluation mechanism prescribed by the Department.
If the performance at any time is below the minimum standard fixed by the Department, Department would subject such Licenced
Surveyor to further training for a period of not less than 3 months and after successful completion of the training, the
Commissioner/Director, Survey Settlement and Land Records shall decide to renew the licence or not, or to recover the financial loss
caused to the applicants.
46 D. Register of Licenced Surveryors :
A register of Licenced Surveyors, District-wise shall be maintained in the office of the Head of the Department, Survey
Settlement and Land Records in prescribed form 11A.
46 E. Fee payable to the Licenced Surveyors :
The licenced surveryours shall be paid a fee as notified by the Government from time to time for preparing the sketch in
accordance with Sections 129 and 131(c).
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2163
46 F. Jurisdiction :
Jurisdiction of the licenced surveyor shall be specified in the licence. Once a jurisdiction is specified in the licence, it cannot
be modified or altered under any circumstances.
46 G. Additional particulars to be contained in the sketch :
Every sketch annexed to the report under the third proviso to section 128 shall also contain the following particulars, namely:
1.
Information regarding Village/Taluk/District.
2.
Area Details.
3.
Kharab details, blockwise.
4.
Signature of vendor or prospective buyer/persons acquiring rights.
5.
Signature of the Licenced Surveyor with seal.
The Department may issue directions to add any additional information from time to time.
46. H. Work Specification :
1) Respective jurisdictional Taluk survey office or any office of the Revenue Department notified by the Government shall
receive applications from the persons acquiring/alienating right in the prescribed Form and collect the measurement fee
as notified by the Government from time to time.
2) Before taking up measurement, Licenced Surveyor shall receive relevant file along with pre-certified copies of the
survey documents of relevant survey number and certified copies of survey documents adjoining survey numbers from
the respective taluk offices by remitting a fee as notified by Government from time to time.
Certified copies applied for by the Licenced Surveyor shall be issued on the same day or within a period of three days.
3) Licenced Surveyor shall issue a notice well in advance in prescribed form to the interested parties and to all the
adjacent land holders before commencing measurements.
4) Licenced Surveyor shall fix the boundaries of survey or hissa number, before sub-dividing survey or hissa number in the
pursuance of all interested parties duly recording their statements and draw mahazar in prescribed Form.
5) Such Sub-divided parcel of land should be well marked on the ground with boundary marks.
6) If there is any dispute regading the title or extent and of any other nature, the application shall be referred to the Survey
Department for disposal as per rules.
7) Measurement shall be carried out as provided under sub-rule (4) of rule 50 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules 1966.
8) Licenced Surveyor has to prepare the following records.
(i)
Hissa Survey Tippan or P.T. Sheet.
(ii)
Hissa Survey pakka or Gunakar Register.
(iii)
Sketch in prescribed Form.
(iv)
Statement in prescribed Form duly signed by all concerned.
Licence Surveyors should prepare records as prescribed by the Department of Survey Settlement and Land records, from
time to time.
9) Licenced Surveyor has to submit the documents specified in sub-rule (9) along with the notice specified in sub-rule (4)
within the time prescribed by commissioner from the date of measurement to the survey office for scrutiny.
10) Taluk Survey office shall issue an acknowledgment to Licenced surveyor in prescribed form. The survey office shall
finalise and shall issue Pre-Mutation sketch within SEVEN days, after validation as per sub-rule 46-I.
11) As far as pending cases are concerned the Government may issue necessary guidelines through a notice.
46 I. Scrutiny of records given by Licenced Surveyor in Taluk Survey Offices :
(1) All the documents prepared and submitted by Licenced surveyor under Rule 46 H (9) shall be scrutinized and approved
by the Taluk Survey Office. The detailed procedure for the same will be prescribed by the department from time to time.
(2) The remaining documents like hissa survey tippan or hissa survey pakka or plain table sheets or gunakar register and
one attested sketch in prescribed Form, shall be preserved separately village wise either in paper form or digital form as
prescribed by the commissioner from time to time.
46 J. Post registration work in Taluk Survey Office :
(1) As soon as the mutation begins or after mutation is certified the copy of Pre-mutation sketch (in prescribed Form) shall
be verified with the records already prepared and preserved.
(2) If both the documents tally then the Prescribed Survey officer will complete durasthi work and initiate the process of
incorporation in the Record of Rights, will approve the changes in survey records and prepare necessary documents as
prescribed by the Department.
2164
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
46 K. Cancellation of Licence :
(1) Suspension of Licence of licenced surveyor :
Licence issued under Rule 46-A shall be kept under suspension if the licenced surveyor contravenes any of the
provisions of the Act or rules, circulars and directions issued by the Government/Commissioner/ Director, Survey
Settlement and Land Records after giving the showcause notice and/or an opportunity of being heard. The power to
suspend the licence will be vested with the Deputy Director of Land Records, Department of Survey Settlement and
Land Records. Appeal against the orders of suspension, shall lie to Joint Director of Land Records.
(2) Cancellation of Licence :
Licence issued under rule 46-A shall be cancelled if the Licenced Surveyor contravences any of the provisions of the
Act, rules, circulars and directions issued by the Government/Commissioner/Director, Survey Settlement and Land
Records, abstains from using the licence continuously for a period of 4 months, demands or accepts illegal gratification
other than the fees due/payable to him and is under investigation by any Governmental agencies for misconduct or
seeks change of jurisdiction already noted in the licence after giving the Licenced Surveyor an opportunity of being
heard.
P.R. 439
SC-100
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
SHAMBHULINGAIAH
Under Secretary to Government,
Revenue Department (SSLR).
EAzsÀ£À ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå : EJ£ï 190 ¸ÀªÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ 2013, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 02-08-2013.
²æà J£ï. ®PÀëöät, ªÀÄÄRå C©üAiÀÄAvÀgÀgÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ «zÀÄåvï ¥Àæ¸ÀgÀt ¤UÀªÀÄ ¤AiÀÄ«ÄvÀ, ºÁ° C¥ÀgÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ),
¥ÀªÀgï PÀA¥À¤ D¥sï PÀ£ÁðlPÀ °«ÄmÉqï EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ «zÀÄåvï ¸ÀgÀ§gÁdÄ PÀA¥À¤, ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ E°è SÁ° EgÀĪÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ
(vÁAwæPÀ) ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ F PÀÆqÀ¯Éà eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ «zÀÄåvï ¸ÀgÀ§gÁdÄ PÀA¥À¤, ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EzÀgÀ ªÉƪÉÆgÁåAqÀªÀiï D¥sï C¸ÉÆùAiÉÄõÀ£ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DnðPÀ¯ïì D¥sï
C¸ÉÆùAiÉÄõÀ£ï£À DnðPÀ¯ï 74 (J) gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ ²æà J£ï. ®PÀëöät, ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (vÁAwæPÀ) EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß F
PÀÆqÀ¯Éà eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ «zÀÄåvï ¸ÀgÀ§gÁdÄ PÀA¥À¤, ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EzÀgÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ
ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ£ÁßV £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
P.R. 442
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
J.J. ZÀ¥Ààgï§AzÀ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
EAzsÀ£À E¯ÁSÉ.
AGRICULTURE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION-I
No: AGD/21/AMS/2012, Bangalore, dated : 4-7-2013.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 15 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968). The Government of
Karnataka hereby appoints the Commissioner for Agriculture in Karnataka to be the Appellate authority for the Whole of the State of
Karnataka for the purpose of appeal against the decision of Licensing officer under Section 13 (except under the proviso to sub-Section
(4)} or Section 14. Appeal shall be accompanied with a fee of Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One Thousand only).
P.R. 443
SC-100
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
J.R. VISHWANATHACHAR
Under Secretary to Government,
Agriculture Department (Planning).
PÀȶ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-I
¸ÀASÉå: PÀÈE/21/PÀÈGE/2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-07-2013.
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968 (1968gÀ PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ 46) gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 15gÀ°è zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ, ¸ÉPÀë£ï 13 (¸À¨ï-¸ÉPÀë£ï
(4)£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹) CxÀªÁ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 14 gÀr ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV ¤ÃrPÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ wêÀiÁð£ÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÄîä£À« ¸À°è¸À®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PÀȶ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß gÁdåzÀ ªÉÄîä£À« ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉëĸÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ªÀÄ£À«AiÀÄ eÉÆvÉUÉ
gÀÆ. 1000/- (gÀÆ¥Á¬Ä MAzÀÄ ¸Á«gÀ ªÀiÁvÀæ) ±ÀÄ®Ì ¥ÁªÀw gÀ¹Ã¢AiÀÄ£ÉÆß¼ÀUÉÆArgÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
P.R.444
SC-100
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
eÉ.Dgï. «±Àé£ÁxÁZÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀȶ E¯ÁSÉ (AiÉÆÃd£É).
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2165
DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå: DPÀÄPÀ 308 ¦LJA 2013, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 31-07-2013.
OµÀzsÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAwªÀzsÀðPÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ 1940gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 33-J¥sï ºÁUÀÆ ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½ 1945gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 44gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ªÉÊeÁÕ¤PÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ,
OµÀzsÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥ÀæAiÉÆÃUÁ®AiÀÄ, DAiÀÄĵï E¯ÁSÉ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ “¸ÀPÁðj
«±ÉèõÀPÀgÀÄ” JAzÀÄ £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
P.R.445
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
PÉ.J£ï. ºÀjtÂAiÀĪÀÄä
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ
(¨sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ ªÉÊzÀå ¥ÀzÀÞw).
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARIAT
CORRIGENDUM
No: HFW 163 RGU 2013, Bangalore, dated : 27-07-2013.
The Government of Karnataka has notified the 3rd additional seat matrix for MBBS Course at Tadikela Subbaiah Medical
College, Kudli road, Shimoga vide Notification No. HFW 163 RGU 2013, dated 16-07-2013. In the Annexures I and II appended to this
notification for the words “Tadikela Subbaiah Medical College, Kudli road, Shimoga” the words “Subbaiah Institute of Medical
Sciences, NH-13, H.H. Road, Purle, Shivamogga-577222” shall be substituted.
P.R. 446
SC-50
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
MAHABOOB KHAN
Under Secretary to Government,
Health and Family Welfare Department (Medical Education).
FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION
No: FEE 29 FWL 2013, Bangalore, dated : 29-07-2013.
Whereas the Government of Karnataka in exercise of Powers conferred under section 18 of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
(Central Act, 53 of 1972) has declared the area described in the schedule of Government Notification No. AFD 50 FWL 74, dated :
05-06-1974 as “Brahmagiri Wildlife Sanctuary” by reasons of its ecological, faunal, floral, geomorphological, natural or zoological
significance for the purpose of protecting, propagating or development Wildlife therein or its environment.
And now, the Government of Karnataka considers its necessary to declare the area as wildlife sanctuary under Sub-section
(1)(b) of Section 26A of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 in view of the following reasons :
1. Since the area does not constitute any area other than an area comprised within the wildlife sanctuary or the territorial
waters and comprises only reserved forest areas, hence the procedure to be followed for proclamation of rights as per
provision of section 19 to 26 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 does not arise ;
2. also, the Revenue Department has not enquired and determined the existence, nature or extent of the right of any person
in or over the land comprised within the limits of sanctuary or National Park as per the provisions of the section 19 to 26 of
the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 ;
3. the notified area of Brahmagiri Wildlife Sanctuary comprises of Reserve Forests only ;
4. while constituting and declaring the Reserve Forest, proclamation has already been carried out by the Forest Settlement
Officer as per provisions of the Indian Forest Act (VII of 1878), and
5. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 was amended during October 1991 to insert Section 26A ;
Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred under section 26A (1)(b) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (Central Act
53 of 1972), the Government of Karnataka hereby declares the area, the situation and limits which are specified in the Schedule of
Government Notification No. AFD 50 FWL, 74 dated : 05-06-1974 as “Brahmagiri Wildlife Sanctuary” with effect from the date of
publication of this notification.
2166
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
SCHEDULE
Name of the District
:
Coorg District
Area
:
44,630.06 Acres or 181.29 Sq. Km. or 18129.00 Ha
Sl.
No.
Name of the
Reserved Forests
RF Notification No.
CPT No.
Total Area in
Ha.
Enclosure
Area in Ha.
Area included
in the
sanctuary in
Ha.
1
Brahmagiri Ghat
Reserved Forest
No. 39 Chief
Commissioner of
Coorg Notification,
Bangalore, dated :
03-05-1904.
8
980.00
-
980.00
9
1013.00
-
1013.00
10
1107.00
-
1107.00
12
1063.00
-
1063.00
11
1138.00
-
1138.00
13
1215.00
-
1215.00
14
930.0
-
930.00
15
1123.22
56.22
1067.00
16
1379.00
-
1379.00
17
1200.00
-
1200.00
18
960.00
-
960.00
19
889.00
-
889,00
Total :
12997.22
56.22
12941.00
2.
Urti Reserved Forest
No. 57, Chief
Commissioner of
Coorg Notification,
Bangalore, dated :
24-06-1908
24
1275.89
1.89
1274.00
25
1122.00
-
1122.00
26
1047.92
190.92
857.00
27
660.00
-
660.00
28
1275.00
-
1275.00
Total :
5380.81
192.81
5188.00
Grand Total :
18378.03
249.03
18129.00
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
North and East : The boundary line starts at the Perambadi tank which is the starting point of Urti reserved forest boundary
and runs all along the boundary of Urti reserve forest in the eastern and further in the south eastern direction till it touches the boundary
line of Brahmagiri ghat reserved forest at Barappe hole. Then, the line continues all along the boundary of Brahmagiri ghat reserved
forest till it reaches Karnataka-Kerala inter-state boundary near Kutta.
South and West : Thence, the line runs westwards and northwards all along the Brahmagiri ghat reserved forest boundary
which is also the interstate boundary of Karnataka-Kerala till it reaches a point on the Barappe hole river at the tri-junction of the Urti
reserved forest, the Parakatageri village and the Malabar district. Then, the line follows the Urti reserved forest boundary along the
Barappe hole river and the Malabar-Coorg district boundary up to the bridge joining the Government Perambadi ghat road. Then, the
line follows the Urti reserved forest boundary all along the Makutta-Virajpet road till it reaches the starting point at Perambadi tank.
P.R. 447
SC-150
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
S.P. PATIL
Under Secretary to Government,
Forest, Ecology and Environment Department.
AGRICULTURE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION-II
No: AGD/21/AMS/2012, Bangalore, dated : 04-07-2013.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the Section 26 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968) and in
supersession of Notification-XII No. AHD/177/AMS/2007, Bangalore Dated : 11-04-2007. The Government of Karnataka hereby appoint
the officers specified in column (2) of the table below to be the Officers for reporting all occurrences of poisoning (through the use or
handling of any insecticide) and the areas specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) thereof :
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2167
Sl No.
Designation of Officers
Areas
1
2
3
1.
All the District Joint Directors of Agriculture
Within their respective District jurisdiction
2.
All the District Health Officers.
Within their respective District Jurisdiction
P.R. 449
SC-100
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
J.R. VISHWANATHACHAR
Under Secretary to Government,
Agriculture Department (Planning).
AGRICULTURE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION-III
No: AGD/21/AMS/2012, Bangalore, dated : 04-07-2013.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub-section (1) Section 20 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968)
read with Rule 28 of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 and in supersession of Notification-XIII No. AHD/552/AMS/2001, Bangalore Dated :
06-05-2002. The Government of Karnataka hereby specially authorise Insecticide Inspectors to Inspect Manufacturing of Insecticides for
the purpose of Rule 28 the officers specified in column (2) of the table below in respect of areas specified in the corresponding entries
in column (3) thereof :
Sl No.
Designation of Officers
Areas
1
2
3
1.
The Director of Agriculture
Whole State of Karnataka
2.
The Additional Director of Agriculture (Organic Farming)
Whole State of Karnataka
3.
The Joint Director of Agriculture (Inputs).
Whole State of Karnataka
4.
The Deputy Director of Agriculture (Plant Protection)
Whole State of Karnataka
5.
All the District Joint Directors of Agriculture.
Within their respective District Jurisdiction.
P.R. 450
SC-100
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
J.R. VISHWANATHACHAR
Under Secretary to Government,
Agriculture Department (Planning).
AGRICULTURE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION-V
No: AGD/21/AMS/2012, Bangalore, dated : 04-07-2013.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 12 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968) read with Rule 10 of
the Insecticides Rules, 1971 and in supersession of Notification-IX No. AHD/552/AMS/2001, Bangalore Dated : 14-02-2002. The
Government of Karnataka hereby appoint the officers specified in column (2) of the table below to be the Licensing Officers
for the grant of License to Sell, Stock or Exhibit for Sale or Distribution of Insecticides and License to Stock and Use Restricted
Insecticide(s) for Commercial Pest Control Operations under the said section for the areas specified in the corresponding entries in
column (3) thereof :
Sl No.
Designation of Officers
Areas
1
2
3
1.
All the District Joint Directors of Agriculture
Within their respective District jurisdiction
P.R. 452
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
J.R. VISHWANATHACHAR
Under Secretary to Government,
Agriculture Department (Planning).
2168
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
KARNATAKA GOVERNOR'S SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION
NO. GS 9 GSE 2010, BANGALORE, DATED 2ND AUGUST 2013.
Whereas, Sri K.C.Kondaiah, member of the Karnataka Legislative Council, gave me a petition on 13-1-2010 requesting
to disqualify three Cabinet Members of the Government of Karnataka namely, Sri G.Janardhana Reddy, Sri G.Karunakara Reddy and
Sri B.Sriramulu under Article 191 of the Constitution of India read with section 9A of the Representation of the People Act 1951 for
having a subsisting contract entered into by them in the course of their mining business with the Government.
Whereas, a notice was issued to the petitioner Sri. K.C. Kondaiah requesting him to furnish some more particulars and show
cause notices were also issued to Sri. G. Janardhana Reddy, Sri. G. Karunakara Reddy and Sri. B. Sriramulu requesting to give their
comments on the petition in question.
Whereas, Sri K.C.Kondaiah did not respond to the notice, so, however, Sri G.Janardhana Reddy, Sri G.Karunakara Reddy
and Sri B.Sriramulu sent their replies.
Whereas in respect of the matter on the question of reference to the Election Commission of India a hearing was fixed
on 10-5-2010 requesting all the parties to appear in person or through their counsels and the same was adjourned to 3-6-2010.
Whereas, after a careful consideration of the entire matter I felt that the opinion of Election Commission of India has to be
obtained before giving any decision on the question as required under Clause (2) of Article 192 of the Constitution of India and
accordingly the question was referred to the Election Commission of India on 3-6-2010.
Whereas, the Election Commission of India, after examining the matter furnished its opinion by its letter dated 19-7-2013 that
the question of any disqualification of Sri G.Janardhana Reddy, Sri G.Karunakara Reddy and Sri B.Sriramulu raised in the petition of
Sri K.C.Kondaiah for being members of Legislative Council / Legislative Assembly of Karnataka has become infructuous as they ceased
to be members of the Legislative Council / Legislative Assembly.
Now, therefore, in excise of the powers conferred on me by Article 192 of the Constitution of India, I, H.R.Bhardwaj, the
Governor of Karnataka hereby agree with the opinion of the Election Commission of India that the question of any disqualification
of Sri G. Janardhana Reddy, Sri. G. Karunakara Reddy and Sri. B. Sriramulu raised in the petition of Sri K.C. Kondaiah has become
infructuous and accordingly the petition of Sri. K.C. Kondaiah is dismissed.
H.R. BHARDWAJ
Governor of Karnataka
R. KALPANA
Under Secretary to Governor (Adm.)
Reference Case No. 2(G) of 2010
[Reference from the Governor of Karnataka under Article 192(2) of the Constitution of India]
In re: Alleged disqualification of Shri G Janardhana Reddy, Shri G Karunakara Reddy and Shri B Sriramulu,
under Art. 191(1) of the Constitution of India.
OPINION
This is a reference dated 03-06-2010 from Governor of Karnataka under Article 192(2) of the Constitution, seeking
the Election Commission's opinion on the question of alleged disqualification of three members of the State Legislature, namely,
Shri G. Janardhana Reddy, MLC, Shri. G. Karunakara Reddy and Shri. B. Sriramulu, both MLAs (hereinafter reffered to as respondents)
2. The Governor's reference is based on three petitions submitted by the petitioner, Shri K.C. Kondaiah, MLC, vide his
petitions dated 13-01-2010, 15-05-2010 and 24-05-2010.
In the first petition (dated 13-1-10), the petitioner made the following allegations:
•
The respondents who are also Ministers in the State Cabinet, have mining business in Andhra Pradesh and in
Karnataka. They have influenced decisions of the State Govt. related to their business in Karnataka. This results in
conflict of interest.
•
The petitioner referred' to Section 9A of the Representation of the People Act 1951, (which deals with
disqualification for contract with the appropriate Govt.). However, there was no specific averment of any subsisting
contract entered into by the three MLAs with the Govt. of Karnataka.
•
The petitioner requested that the respondents be removed from their Ministerial position and also disqualified for
holding office of profit.
3. The second petition dated 15th May, 2010, contained some allegations of misuse of position by the respondents,
influencing cabinet decisions in their favour, causing loss to the public exchequer, influencing decision to withdraw cases pending
against them including cases related to electoral offences, illegal demolition of ancient temple at the mining site, illegal mining and
encroachment on Govt. land. The relief claimed in this petition was for removal of the respondents from the State Cabinet, and to take
appropriate action against them.
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2169
4. In the third petition (dated 24-5-10) , the petitioner raised the following allegations:
•
The respondents have mining lease with the State Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, in the name of Obalapuram Mining
Company, AntharagangammaKonda Mines and Ananthapura Mining Corporation.
•
They are engaging in illegal mining and running benami mining companies in Karnataka.
•
They have been collecting percentage of profits from other smaller mining, companies in Karnataka.
•
The respondents are share holders in a Company by the name GLA Trading International Company registered on
30-11-2007 at Singapore, with offices in Singapore, Dubai and British Virginia Islands.In 2007-08, and 2008-09, the
Obalapuram Mining Company exported 50 Mt. Tons of iron ore to the GLA Trading Company at a rate which was
50 $ less than the market price, thereby making huge profit. This act amounts to the respondents being under
allegiance to a foreign state attracting disqualification under Article 191(1)(d) of the Constitution.
•
The relief sought in the petition was that the respondents should be disqualified from membership of the State
Legislature for their anti-national activities and dismissed from the Council of Ministers.
5. The Commission issued notice to the respondents on 23-06-2010 to file their written statements in reply to the petitions by
15-07-2010. But, the respondents instead approached the Karnataka High Court on 09-07-2010 by filing Writ Petitions Nos. 21187,
21188 and 20340 of 2010 challenging the reference made by the Governor and the Commission's notice to them asking for their reply.
Although they prayed for stay of further proceedings, the High Court did not grant any stay order. The learned Single Judge heard the
matter over several days and then referred it for consideration by a Division Bench. The High Court, vide its order dated 13-07-10, also
granted extension by 10 days to the petitioners to file their reply before the Commission as the period for their reply was due to expire
on 15-07-10.
6. The respondents thereupon filed their reply to the Commission's notice on 26-07-2010. Their contentions were as follows:
•
The petitions do not make out any case of disqualification under the Constitution or under the Representation of the
People Act, 1951. The reference by the Governor is without framing the disqualification question.
•
Illegal mining as alleged by the petitioner does not attract disqualification under the law.
•
The petitions seeking disqualification are vague and in the absence of any specific question, it is inappropriate to
call for reply.
•
The petitions are not maintainable in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kartar Singh Bhadana v
Hari Singh Nalwa [(2001) 4 SCC 661] in which it was held that holding mining lease is not a disqualification under
Sec. 9A of the RP Act, 51.
•
The allegations are not supported by affidavit.
•
In view of the petitions filed by them before the Karnataka High Court challenging the reference made by the
Governor, the Commission may not proceed with the inquiry in the reference case.
•
They were Directors or partners in the mining companies even before they became members of the. Legislature.
Therefore, disqualification, if any, existed . before their election.
•
The Commission should not conduct inquiry into complaints containing baseless allegations.
•
They also requested that they may be given a hearing on the preliminary submissions, or permit them to produce
further documents and conduct a full-fledged inquiry.
7. The petitioner, in his rejoinder dated 11-08-2010, reiterated the submissions about illegal and benami mining activities,
misuse of position by the respondents for their benefit at the cost of public interest, conflict of interest on account of the respondents
being Ministers and also having business activities, iron ore export to GLA Trading Company by the Obalapuram Mining Company, etc.
In a separate communication dated 14-08-2010, the petitioner stated that he was in the process of gathering further evidence and
requested for more time to file the same. The Commission granted his request for time and allowed him to submit by 06-09-2010,
additional documents, if any, related to the question of disqualification raised in his original petitions. The petitioner later requested for
one more month to file the documents. The Commission again granted his request and permitted him to file the papers by 27-09-10.
Later, the petitioner stated on 27-09-2010 that further information and evidence would be furnished at the time of hearing.
8. The Commission then fixed hearing in the matter on several dates, the first hearing being on 15-11-10. However, on
12-11-10, the petitioner submitted an application stating that he wanted to file voluminous records which are in vernacular and needed
to be translated in English and requested for adjournment of hearing by 8 weeks. The respondents also filed applications stating that
they had filed writ petitions before the Karnataka High Court, challenging the reference made by the Governor and made a request for
adjournment of the hearing till their petitions were disposed of by the High Court. Granting the above requests, the Commission fixed a
hearing on 11-03-11 which was adjourned to 31-03-11 on the prayer of the respondents. The respondents 1 and 3 again filed
application on 08-03-2011 requesting for adjournment of hearing to a date beyond 27-05-11 which was the date then fixed for the
hearing of their petitions before the High Court. Respondent No.2 also filed an application on 11-03-2011, requesting that the
proceedings be kept in abeyance till the disposal of his writ petition. The Commission saw merit in this prayer and decided that further
hearing would be considered after the outcome of the writ petitions was known. Pertinent to add here that the petitioner had not filed
any additional documents, except a letter dated 04-03-11 in which he stated that respondent No. 1 and his wife had become partners of
2170
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
a Mining Company called Associated Mining Company. In the said letter, the petitioner also raised the issues of certain alleged
illegalities committed by the respondents for their personal gain by misusing their office and influence. However, no document to
support the allegation of contract of the respondents with the State Government of Karnataka was submitted.
9. The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petitions of the respondents on 04-06-2012. However, certified copy of the
order passed by the High Court was received in the Commission on 29-01-2013. Thereupon, the Commission fixed further hearing in
the matter on 25-03-13. It was observed that in the meantime, the term of respondent No. 1 as MLC had expired on 17-06-12. Thus, he
was no longer a member of the State Legislature and hence the petition in so far as it concerned the first respondent had thereby
become infructuous. Therefore, notice for hearing was given to the, petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 only.
10. At the hearing on 25-03-13, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made a submission that the
documents on which he was relying upon were in the custody of the CBI and the Karnataka Lokayukta, and he requested for two
months time to file further documents in support of his petition. He also submitted written application to this effect. Considering the
relevance of the documents under reference, the Commission directed the petitioner to submit the documents at the earliest and
adjourned the hearing.
11. Thereafter, the petitioner has neither submitted any document so far nor sent any communication in this behalf. In the
meantime, as the term of the Legislative Assembly of Karnataka was due to expire on 03-06-2013 a general election to constitute a new
Legislative Assembly was held in April-May, 2013. The new Legislative Assembly was accordingly constituted on 10-05-2013 and the
earlier Assembly was dissolved thereupon. The term of the new Legislative Assembly commenced w.e.f. 29-05-2013 under Article
172(1) of the Constitution.
12. With the dissolution of the earlier Legislative Assembly, the said respondents 2 and 3 ceased to be members of that
Legislative Assembly. As noticed earlier, respondent No.1, Sh. Janardhana Reddy had already ceased to be member of the Legislative
Council on the expiration of the term of his membership on 17-06-12. Thus, none of the three respondents now continue to be member
of the House in relation to which the petitions raising the question of their disqualification were filed. In view of this, the issue now to be
considered is whether the question of the alleged disqualification of the respondents raised in the petitions referred to above, still
survives for proceeding with the inquiry into the question raised.
13. The proceedings before the Commission in the references from the President and the Governors under Articles 103(2)
and 192(2) are quasi-judicial proceedings. Hence, in such matters, the Commission is guided by, and follows, the principles, procedures
and policy adopted by the Supreme Court and High Courts. As a general principle, the Courts look into live issues between the parties
and do not undertake to decide an issue which is purely academic or has become infructuous on account of any supervening event.
In cases where during the pendency of an election petition or election appeal, the candidate whose election was under challenge
ceased to be a member of the House concerned, on his death or on account of his resignation from the seat in the House concerned or
where the House itself got dissolved, the Supreme Court and High Courts have treated the petition/appeal as infructuous and dismissed
the petition/appeal as such.
14. In Loknath Padhanvs Birendra Kumar Sahu (AIR 1974 SC 505), the Supreme Court has held that :
'It is a well settled practice recognized and followed in India as well as England that a Court should not undertake to decide an
issue, unless it is a living issue between the parties. If an issue is purely academic in that its decision one way or the other would have
no impact on the position of the parties it would be waste of public time and indeed not proper exercise of authority for the Court to
engage itself in deciding it .."
15. Again the Supreme Court observed in DhartipakarMadanLal Vs. Rajiv Gandhi (AIR 1987 SC 1577) as follows:
'Court should not undertake to decide an issue unless it is a living issue between the parties. If an issue is purely academic, in
that its decision one way or. the other would have no impact on the position of the parties, it would be waste of public time to engage
itself in deciding it. Lord Viscount Simon in his speech in the House of Lords in Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada vs. Jervis,
1944 AC 111 observed," I do not think: that it would be a proper' exercise of the Authority which this House possesses to hear appeals if
it occupies time in this case in deciding an academic question, the answer to which cannot affect the respondent in any way. It is an
essential quality of an appeal fit to be disposed of by this House that there should exist between the parties to a matter on actual
controversy which the House undertakes to decide as a living issue:' These observations are relevant in exercising the appellate
jurisdiction of this Court:'
16. The Commission has consistently followed the above judicial principle in the reference cases where the member, against
whom complaint was made, ceased to be a member of the House concerned, before opinion could be tendered by the Commission.
17. In all such cases in the past in which the person to whom the complaint pertained ceased to be a member of the House
concerned, the Commission has consistently tendered opinion to the effect that the case had been rendered infructuous, and opinion by
the Commission on the question raised would only be of academic value. The Commission's opinion dated 17-06-1971 in the reference
case regarding alleged disqualification of Sh. Ranjibhai Choudhary and twelve other members of Gujarat Legislative Assembly
(51 ELR 354), opinion dated 10-01-1972 in the matter of alleged disqualification of Sh. Lajinder Singh Bedi and two other members of
Punjab Legislative Assembly (51 ELR 360), opinion dated 02-07 -1980 in the case of alleged disqualification of Sh. Avdhesh Singh and
ten other members of Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, opinion dated 17-10-1990, in case of alleged disqualification of Dr. Jaganath
Mishra, Member of Rajya Sabha, opinion dated 27-10-1990 in the case of alleged disqualification Sh.Mahadeo Kashiray Patil, Member
of Rajya Sabha, opinion dated 12-07-1992 in the case of alleged disqualification of Smt. Jayanthi Natarajan, Member of Rajya Sabha,
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2171
opinion dated 29-08-1997, regarding alleged disqualification of Ms. J. Jayalalitha, Member of Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, opinion
dated 03-04-2006 in the reference case regarding alleged disqualification of Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Member of Lok Sabha and opinion
dated 28-04-2006 in the reference case regarding alleged disqualification of Smt. Kapila Vatsyayan, Member of Rajya Sabha are a few
examples of similar cases.
18. Out of the three respondents, Sh. Sriramulu has got elected to the Legislative Assembly again at the general election held
in April-May, 2013. However, the present petition which raised question of alleged disqualification for being a member of the previous
Legislative Assembly can not be treated as a petition raising any question of his disqualification for being a member of the current
Legislative Assembly. Further, the question of disqualification raised in the present petition would be a matter of pre-election
disqualification, if at all any disqualification is attracted, in so far as the membership of Sh. Sriramulu in the current Legislative Assembly
is concerned. Under Article 192(1) of the Constitution, only cases of disqualification incurred after being elected as a member can be
raised before the Governor. Questions of pre-election disqualification can not be raised under Article 192(1) of the Constitution.
Reference in this context is invited to the Supreme Courts catena of decisions in Election Commission Vs. SakaVenkataRao (AIR 1953
SC 201); BrundabanNaik Vs. Election Commission (AIR 1965 SC 1892); Election Commission Vs. N.G.Ranga (AIR 1978 SC 1609);
etc.,
19. Having regard to the above constitutional and Legal position, and consistent with the view taken by the Commission in all
such reference cases in the past, mentioned above, the Commission is of the considered opinion that the question of alleged
disqualification of Shri.G Janardhana Reddy, Shri G Karunakara Reddy and Shri B Sriramulu raised in the petitions of
Sh. K. C. Kondaiah for being members of the Legislative Council / Legislative Assembly of Karnataka, has become infructuous.
20. Accordingly, the reference dated 3rd June, 2010, of the Governor of Karnataka, is hereby returned with the Commission's
opinion under Article 192 (2) that the same has become infructuous.
Dr. NASIM ZAIDI
ELECTION COMMISSIONER
V.S.SAMPATH
CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
H.S. BRAHMA
ELECTION COMMISSIONER
P.R.491
R KALPANA
Under Secretary to Governor
(Administration)
M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛïÉ
¸ÀASÉå: ºÉZïr 252 J¸ïJ¸ïn 2013, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 26-07-2013.
¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ PÉëÃvÀæUÀ½UÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ 20-ªÀÄAqÀå ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ PÉëÃvÀæ ºÁUÀÆ 23-¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ
: 21-08-2013 gÀAzÀÄ £ÀqÉAiÀÄ°zÀÄÝ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è F PɼÀPÀAqÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆvÀ¥ÀàzÉà ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
1.
f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ f¯Áè ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ eÉÆvÉUÀÆr CªÀgÀªÀgÀ f¯ÉèUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÀÆPÀëöä ºÁUÀÆ Cwà ¸ÀÆPÀëöä ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
UÀÄgÀÄw¹ PÀÆqÀ¯Éà ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
2.
¸ÀÆPÀëöä ºÁUÀÆ Cwà ¸ÀÆPÀëöä ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¨sÀzÀævÁ ªÀåªÀ¸ÉÜUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
3.
¸ÀÆPÀëöä ºÁUÀÆ Cwà ¸ÀÆPÀëöä ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖUÀ¼À ¨sÀzÀævÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¹§âA¢¬ÄAzÀ¯Éà ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ UÀȺÀgÀPÀëPÀ zÀ¼ÀzÀ
¹§âA¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉëĸÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ.
4.
ªÀÄÆgÀQÌAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖUÀ¼ÀÄ MAzÉà ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, CªÀÅUÀ½UÉ §AzÉÆç¸ïÛ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä PÀ¤µÀ× M§â ªÀÄÄRå ¥ÉÃzÉ
ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀ eÉÆvÉ UÀȺÀgÀPÀëPÀ zÀ¼ÀzÀ ¹§âA¢ CxÀªÁ ¥ÉưøÀgÀ£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. UÀȺÀ gÀPÀëPÀ zÀ¼ÀzÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß J¯Áè ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå
ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖUÀ¼À°è £ÉëĸÀ®Ä PÀæªÀÄ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
5.
f¯Áè ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉUÉ vÀPÀÌAvÉ ¸ÀAZÁj zÀ¼ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀa¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ £ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÁUÀ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÁzÀgÀÆ ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖAiÀÄ°è d£À¸ÀAZÁgÀ, zÀlÖuÉ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà C»vÀPÀgÀ WÀl£É £ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ¥Àæ¸ÀAUÀªÀÅAmÁzÀ°è F
¸ÀAZÁj zÀ¼ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤AiÉÆÃf¹ CAvÀºÀ ªÀÄvÀUÀmÉÖUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¨sÀzÀævÉ ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
6.
¸ÀPÀð¯ï ¥Éưøï E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgï, rªÉÊJ¸ï¦ ºÁUÀÆ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¸ÀéAvÀ
HgÀÄ/f¯ÉèAiÀÄ°è PÉ®¸À ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÀÝgÉ, CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÀÆqÀ¯Éà C°èAzÀ ¨ÉÃgÉ PÀqÉUÉ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
7.
ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ¥ÀƪÀðzÀ°è ±À¸ÁÛç¸ÀÛç ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀªÀgÀÄ ±À¸ÁÛç¸ÀÛçUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀPÀët oÉêÀt EqÀĪÀAvÉ ¤zÉÃð²¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. F
¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtð ªÀiÁ»w UÀtPÀAiÀÄAvÀæzÀ°è ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃrPÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.
8.
ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ªÉüÉAiÀÄ°è ºÁUÀÆ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ¥ÀƪÀðzÀ°è f¯ÉèAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ bÀvÀæ ¸ÀAWÀ-¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À ªÉÄïÉ
PÀlÄÖ¤nÖ£À ¤UÁ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ CªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À PÉ®¸À ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ªÉÄÃ®Æ ¸ÀºÀ UÀÄ¥ÀÛZÀgÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½AzÀ ªÀiÁ»w vÀj¹ ¤UÁ
ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
9.
ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ°è CqÀZÀuÉ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà vÀgÀºÀzÀ vÉÆAzÀgÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß GAlÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÁzsÀåvÉ EgÀĪÀ
¸ÀªÀiÁdWÁvÀÄPÀ ªÀåQÛUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É wêÀæ ¤UÁ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. CzÉà jÃw ««zsÀ PÁAiÉÄÝ/ PÁ£ÀƤ£ÀrAiÀÄ°è PÉ®ªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAeÁUÀævÁ
PÀæªÀĪÁV §A¢ü¹ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ (Preventive Detention) CªÀ±Àå«zÀÝ°è UÀrÃ¥ÁgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
10. f¯ÉèAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀiÁdWÁvÀÄPÀ ªÀåQÛUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ««zsÀ PÁ£ÀƤ£ÀrAiÀÄ°è eÁjAiÀiÁUÀzÀ ¨ÁQ EgÀĪÀ eÁ«ÄãÀÄgÀ»vÀ
ªÁgÀAmï£ÀÄß eÁj ªÀiÁr ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
2172
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
11. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è UÀr ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀqÁØAiÀĪÁV ¹Ã¯ï ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
12. UÀr ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À°è ZÉPï¥ÉÆøïÖ£ÀÄß ¸Áܦ¹ UÀr¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À°è NqÁqÀĪÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ d£ÀgÀ ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄïÉ
PÀuÁΪÀ°j¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
13. f¯Áè ¥Éưøï C¢üÃPÀëPÀgÀ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ°è MAzÀÄ PÀAmÉÆæïï gÀÆA£ÀÄß ¸Áܦ¹ CzÀgÀ zÀÆgÀªÁt ¸ÀASÉå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C°è PÀvÀðªÀå
¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ, ºÀÄzÉÝ, zÀÆgÀªÁt ¸ÀASÉå, ªÉƨÉÊ¯ï ¸ÀASÉå §UÉÎ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ºÁUÀÆ
¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ (M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ) «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ¸ÀzÀj PÀAmÉÆæïï gÀÆA£À°è ¥ÀævÉåÃPÀªÁzÀ zÀÆgÀÄ Cfð ªÀ»AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¤ªÀð»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. AiÀiÁgÁzÀgÀÆ zÀÆgÀÄ ¸À°è¹zÀ°è 24 UÀAmÉUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÁV CªÀjUÉ GvÀÛgÀ ¤ÃqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. ¥Àæw ªÁgÀzÀ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
¹éÃPÀj¹zÀ CfðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ «¯ÉÃAiÀiÁzÀ CfðUÀ¼À §UÉÎ CAQ-CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß f¯Áè¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ «ÃPÀëPÀjUÉ
PÀqÁØAiÀĪÁV ¸À°è¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. zÀÆgÀÄ CfðUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉƼÀîzÉà EzÀÝ°è CzÀ£ÀÄß gÁdå ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ DAiÉÆÃUÀªÀÅ
UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV ¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
14. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ «ÃPÀëPÀjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ gÀPÀëuÉ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. CªÀgÀÄ vÀAVgÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è CªÀjUÉ gÀPÀëuÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀévÀB
CªÀjUÉ PÀ¤µÀ× M§â CAUÀgÀPÀëPÀ£À£ÀÄß MzÀV¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
15. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ªÉüÉAiÀÄ°è PÀ¼Àî¨sÀnÖ ¸ÁgÁ¬Ä, ±ÉÃA¢ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÁgÁ¬Ä ªÀiÁgÁl DUÀzÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃrPÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. eÉÆvÉUÉ UÁAeÁ
ºÁUÀÆ £ÁPÉÆðnPï qÀæUïìUÀ¼À ªÀiÁgÁl, PÀ¼Àî¸ÁUÁuÉ ªÉÄÃ¯É wêÀæ ¤UÁ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ PÀpt PÀæªÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀîªÀÅzÀÄ.
ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ ªÉÃ¼É ºÀzÀÄݧ¹Û£À ºÉÆgÀUÀqÉAiÀÄÆ ¸ÀºÀ ªÁºÀ£ÀUÀ¼À ºÁUÀÆ d£ÀgÀ ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£ÀUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ¸ÀÆPÀÛ ¤UÁ ªÀ»¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
16. Qæ«Ä£À¯ï C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀÄļÀî ªÀåQÛUÀ¼ÀÄ, UÀÆAqÁ ZÀlĪÀnPÉUÀ¼À°è ¨sÁVAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀªÀgÀÄ, ¸ÀªÀiÁdWÁvÀÄPÀ ªÀåQÛUÀ¼ÀÄ,
ªÀÈwÛ¤gÀvÀ ªÀiÁ¦üAiÀiÁUÀ¼À §UÉÎ wêÀæ ¤UÁ EqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
17. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÀÆgÀÄ §AzÀ°è CzÀ£ÀÄß PÀÆqÀ¯Éà ¥Àj²Ã°¹ CzÀgÀ §UÉÎ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀiÁr CzÀ£ÀÄß
«¯Éà ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. zÀÆgÀÄzÁgÀjUÉ EzÀgÀ §UÉÎ »A§gÀºÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤Ãr ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄRå ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÁ¢üPÁj, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ
ºÁUÀÆ M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀjUÉ ¸À°è¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
18. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è ºÁUÀÆ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ¥ÀæPÀgÀt zÁR¯ÁzÀ°è CAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj C©üAiÉÆÃdPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ DgÉÆæUÀ¼À eÁ«ÄãÀÄ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «gÉÆâü¹ eÁ«ÄãÀÄ ¹UÀzÀ ºÁUÉ
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÁzÀ ªÀÄAr¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
19. vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä f¯ÉèUÀ¼À°è C®à¸ÀASÁåvÀgÀÄ, »AzÀĽzÀ ªÀUÀðzÀªÀgÀÄ ªÁ¹¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß UÀÄgÀÄw¹ CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀܼÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÀÆPÀÛ
¤UÁ ªÀ»¹ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉUÉ C£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV ºÉaÑ£À gÀPÀëuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MzÀV¹ CªÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¨sÀAiÀÄ-©Ãw E®èzÉ ªÀÄvÀ
ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸À®Ä C£ÀĪÀÅ ªÀiÁrPÉÆqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
20. CAvÀgï gÁdå UÀr ¨sÁUÀUÀ¼À°è ºÉaÑ£À ¤UÁ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. f¯Áè zÀAqÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ±À¸ÁÛç¸ÀÛç PÁ¬ÄzÉ CrAiÀÄ°è ¯ÉʸɣïìzÁgÀgÀÄ
vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä DAiÀÄÄzsÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß qÉ¥Á¹mï ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ zÀÈqsÀ¥Àr¹PÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ºÁUÀÆ ±À¸ÁÛç¸ÀÛç ªÀiÁgÁlUÁgÀgÀÄ/rîgïì/j¥ÉÃj
ªÀiÁqÀĪÀªÀgÀ ªÀĽUÉ/CAUÀrUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¥Á¸ÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
21. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀĪÀåªÀ¸ÉÜUÉ ¨sÀAUÀ ¨ÁgÀzÀAvÉ ¸ÀÄUÀªÀĪÁV £ÀqɸÀĪÀ°è ¸ÀÆPÀÛ PÀæªÀÄ
PÉÊUÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
22. ¨sÀzÀævÉ ºÁUÀÆ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¸ÀĪÀåªÀ¸ÉÜUÉ, ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ £ÉªÀÄä¢UÉ ¨sÀAUÀ GAmÁUÀĪÀ ¸À¤ßªÉñÀUÀ¼À°è ¨sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ zÀAqÀ
¸ÀA»vÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°è ¸ÉPÀÆåjn ¸ÉPÀë£ïìUÀ¼ÀÄ zÁR°¹zÀÝ°è, CAvÀºÀÄUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É f¯Áè zÀAqÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ/G¥À«¨sÁVÃAiÀÄ/vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ
zÀAqÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀÆqÀ¯Éà ¤AiÀĪÀiÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
23. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄĪÀªÀgÉUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà gËr²Ãmï£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄPÁÛAiÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ.
24. ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ ¸ÀA§AzsÀ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR PÁAiÀÄðPÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À «rAiÉÆà vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀîªÀÅzÀÄ.
F ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¯ÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÉ CªÀPÁ±À ¤ÃqÀzÀAvÉ PÀlÄÖ¤mÁÖV ¥Á°¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
P.R.448
SC-150
J¸ï.PÉ. ¥ÀlÖ£ÁAiÀÄPï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
M¼ÁqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉ.
AGRICULTURE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION-IV
No: AGD/21/AMS/2012, Bangalore, dated : 04-07-2013.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the Sub-Section (1) Section 31 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968)
and in supersession of Notification-XII No. AHD/552/AMS/2001, Bangalore Dated : 06-05-2002. The Government of Karnataka hereby
appoint the officers specified in column (2) of the table below to be the Officers for issuing written consent for prosecution for an offence
under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the areas specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) thereof :
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2173
Sl No.
Designation of Officers
Areas
1
2
3
1.
The Additional Director of Agriculture (Organic Farming)
Whole State of Karnataka in case of Insecticide
Inspectors seeking written consent to institute
prosecution for any offence noticed while
discharging
their
duties
under
Rule
28
(Inspectors specially authorized to inspect the
manufacture of insecticides) of the Insecticides
Rules,
1971
and
Insecticide
Inspectors
appointed by the Central Government.
2.
All the District Joint Directors of Agriculture.
Within their respective District Jurisdiction except
in case of Insecticide Inspectors seeking written
consent to institute prosecution for any offence
noticed while discharging their duties under Rule
28 (Inspectors specially authorized to inspect the
manufacture of insecticides) of the Insecticides
Rules,
1971
and
Insecticide
Inspectors
appointed by the Central Government.
P.R. 451
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
J.R. VISHWANATHACHAR
Under Secretary to Government,
Agriculture Department (Planning).
AGRICULTURE SECRETARIAT
NOTIFICATION-VI
No: AGD/21/AMS/2012, Bangalore, dated : 04-07-2013.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the Section 12 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (Central Act 46 of 1968) read with Rule 9
of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 and in supersession of Notification-X No. AHD/552/AMS/2001, Bangalore Dated 14-02-2002. The
Government of Karnataka hereby appoints the Director of Agriculture in Karnataka to be the Licensing Officer for the Whole of the State
of Karnataka for the purpose of granting Licence to Manufacture Insecticides.
P.R. 453
SC-100
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
J.R. VISHWANATHACHAR
Under Secretary to Government,
Agriculture Department (Planning).
PÀȶ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-II
¸ÀASÉå: PÀÈE/21/PÀÈGE/2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-07-2013.
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968 (1968gÀ PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ 46) gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 26 gÀ°è zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-XII ¸ÀASÉå : JºÉZïr/177/JJAJ¸ï/2007, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 11-04-2007£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉƽ¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PɼÀV£À
vÀBSÉÛAiÀÄ°è£À (2)£Éà PÁ®A£À°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (3)£Éà PÁ®A£À C£ÀĸÁgÀ ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀPÉÌ J¯Áè QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ
«µÀ¥Áæ±À£À (QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß §¼À¸ÀĪÁUÀ CxÀªÁ ¤ªÀð»¸ÀĪÁUÀ) ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉëĹzÉ.
PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ
¥ÀæzÉñÀ
1.
J¯Áè f¯Áè dAn PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
CªÀgÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è
2.
J¯Áè f¯Áè DgÉÆÃUÁå¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ
CªÀgÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è
P.R.454
SC-100
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
eÉ.Dgï. «±Àé£ÁxÁZÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀȶ E¯ÁSÉ (AiÉÆÃd£É).
2174
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀȶ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-III
¸ÀASÉå: PÀÈE/21/PÀÈGE/2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-07-2013.
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968 (1968gÀ PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ 46) gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 20 ¸À¨ï-¸ÉPÀë£ï(1) gÀ°è (QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ,
1971gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 28 gÉÆA¢UÉ N¢PÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ) zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É- XIII ¸ÀASÉå : JºÉZïr/552/JJAJ¸ï/
2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 06-05-2002£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉƽ¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PɼÀV£À vÀBSÉÛAiÀÄ°è£À (2)£Éà PÁ®A£À°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (3)£Éà PÁ®A£À C£ÀĸÁgÀ ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀPÉÌ J¯Áè QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1971gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 28gÀr
«±ÉõÀªÁV, QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ vÀAiÀiÁjPÁ WÀlPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¥Á¸ÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ ¥Àj«ÃPÀëPÀgÀ£ÁßV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉëĹzÉ.
PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ
¥ÀæzÉñÀ
1.
PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀzÁåAvÀ
2.
C¥ÀgÀ PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¸ÁªÀAiÀĪÀ PÀȶ)
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀzÁåAvÀ
3.
dAn PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¥ÀjPÀgÀ)
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀzÁåAvÀ
4.
G¥À PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¸À¸Àå ¸ÀAgÀPÀëuÉ)
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀzÁåAvÀ
5.
f¯Áè dAn PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
CªÀgÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è
P.R.455
SC-100
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
eÉ.Dgï. «±Àé£ÁxÁZÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀȶ E¯ÁSÉ (AiÉÆÃd£É).
PÀȶ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-IV
¸ÀASÉå: PÀÈE/21/PÀÈGE/2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-07-2013.
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968 (1968gÀ PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ 46) gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 31 ¸À¨ï-¸ÉPÀë£ï(1) gÀ°è zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É- XII ¸ÀASÉå : JºÉZïr/552/JJAJ¸ï/2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 06-05-2007£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉƽ¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ
PɼÀV£À vÀBSÉÛAiÀÄ°è£À (2)£Éà PÁ®A£À°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (3)£Éà PÁ®A£À C£ÀĸÁgÀ ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀPÉÌ QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À
PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968gÀr J¸ÀVzÀ C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÉÌ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä °TvÀ M¦àUÉ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉëĹzÉ.
PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ
¥ÀæzÉñÀ
1.
C¥ÀgÀ PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¸ÁªÀAiÀĪÀ PÀȶ)
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀzÁåAvÀ, QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1971gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ
28gÀr «±ÉõÀªÁV, QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ vÀAiÀiÁjPÁ WÀlPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¥Á¸ÀuÉ
ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ ¥Àj«ÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀĪÁUÀ PÀAqÀÄ
§AzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÉÌ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä
PÉÆÃgÀĪÀ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
PÉÃAzÀæ
¸ÀPÁðgÀ
£ÉëĹzÀ
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ
¥Àj«ÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ °TvÀ M¦àUÉ ¤ÃqÀ®Ä.
2.
J¯Áè f¯Áè dAn PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
CªÀgÀ
f¯ÉèAiÀÄ
C¢üPÁgÀ
ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è£À
J¯Áè
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ
¥Àj«ÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ (QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1971gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ
28gÀr «±ÉõÀªÁV, QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ vÀAiÀiÁjPÁ WÀlPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¥Á¸ÀuÉ
ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ ¥Àj«ÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀĪÁUÀ PÀAqÀÄ
§AzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà C¥ÀgÁzsÀPÉÌ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ºÀÆqÀ®Ä
PÉÆÃgÀĪÀ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
PÉÃAzÀæ
¸ÀPÁðgÀ
£ÉëĹzÀ
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ
¥Àj«ÃPÀëPÀgÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹).
P.R.456
SC-100
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
eÉ.Dgï. «±Àé£ÁxÁZÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀȶ E¯ÁSÉ (AiÉÆÃd£É).
¨sÁUÀ 4J
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
2175
PÀȶ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-V
¸ÀASÉå: PÀÈE/21/PÀÈGE/2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-07-2013.
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968 (1968gÀ PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ 46) gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 12gÀ°è (QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1971gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ
10 gÉÆA¢UÉ N¢PÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ) zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É- IX ¸ÀASÉå : JºÉZïr/552/JJAJ¸ï/2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ,
¢£ÁAPÀ : 14-02-2002£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉƽ¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PɼÀV£À vÀBSÉÛAiÀÄ°è£À (2)£Éà PÁ®A£À°è ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß (3)£ÉÃ
PÁ®A£À C£ÀĸÁgÀ ¤¢ðµÀÖ¥Àr¹zÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀPÉÌ, ªÀiÁgÁl, zÁ¸ÁÛ£ÀÄ CxÀªÁ ªÀiÁgÁl ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£ÀPÉÌ CxÀªÁ QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À «vÀgÀuÉUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
ªÁtÂdå QÃl ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt PÁAiÀÄðUÀ½UÁV ¤§ðA¢üvÀ QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À zÁ¸ÁÛ£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV ¤ÃqÀ®Ä QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV
¤ÃrPÉ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÁßV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉëĹzÉ.
PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå
C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¥ÀzÀ£ÁªÀÄ
¥ÀæzÉñÀ
1.
J¯Áè f¯Áè dAn PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
CªÀgÀ f¯ÉèAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è
P.R.457
SC-100
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
eÉ.Dgï. «±Àé£ÁxÁZÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀȶ E¯ÁSÉ (AiÉÆÃd£É).
PÀȶ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É-VI
¸ÀASÉå: PÀÈE/21/PÀÈGE/2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 25-07-2013.
QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1968 (1968gÀ PÉÃA¢æÃAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄÝ 46) gÀ ¸ÉPÀë£ï 12gÀ°è (QÃl£Á±ÀPÀUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ, 1971gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 9
gÉÆA¢UÉ N¢PÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ) zÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É- X ¸ÀASÉå : JºÉZïr/552/JJAJ¸ï/2001, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ
: 14-02-2002£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝUÉƽ¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ PÀȶ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß QÃl£Á±ÀPÀ vÀAiÀiÁjPÁ ¥ÀgÀªÁ£ÀV ¤ÃrPÉ
C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ £ÉëĸÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
P.R.458
SC-100
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
eÉ.Dgï. «±Àé£ÁxÁZÁgï
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀȶ E¯ÁSÉ (AiÉÆÃd£É).
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå : Dgïr 355 J¯ïDgïJ 2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 02-02-2013.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ (1961gÀ PÀ®A 48gÀ G¥À PÀ®A (1) jAzÀ (3) gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀ ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹
²ªÀªÉÆUÀÎ f¯Éè, wÃxÀðºÀ½î vÁ®ÆèQ£À ¨sÀÆ £ÁåAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : Dgïr 149 J¯ïDgïJ
2008gÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 21-01-2009£ÀÄß ¨sÁUÀ±ÀB ªÀiÁ¥Àðr¹ “²æà ºÀµÉÃðAzÀæ PÀĪÀiÁgï” EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß C¢üPÁgÉÃvÀgÀ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ£ÁßV £ÉëĹgÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß
gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹, EªÀgÀ eÁUÀzÀ°è “²æà ©.J£ï. C±ÉÆÃPÀ ©£ï £ÉêÀÄtÚ, ©zÀgÀĪÀÄ£É, DgÀUÀ CAZÉ, wÃxÀðºÀ½î vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, ²ªÀªÉÆUÀÎ f¯Éè” EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß
£ÁªÀĤzÉÃð±À£À ªÀiÁr DzÉò¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
P.R.459
SC-15
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
©.JA. zÁPÁëAiÀÄtªÀÄä
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ (¨sÀÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ).
2176
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ¸É¥ÉÖA§gï 12, 2013
¨sÁUÀ 4J
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É
¸ÀASÉå : ¹M 12 ¹J£ïJ¸ï 2013, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 10-07-2013.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1959gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 28J G¥À ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 4©)(1)gÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ §¼Áîj f¯Éè ºÉƸÀ¥ÉÃmÉ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ¥ÁæxÀ«ÄPÀ
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ PÀȶ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÁæ«ÄÃuÁ©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¨ÁåAPï ¤. ºÉƸÀ¥ÉÃmÉ EzÀgÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½UÉ ²æà CAUÀr £ÁUÀgÁeï vÀAzÉ ²æà CAUÀr ®QëöäãÁgÁAiÀÄt¥Àà, G¥ÁàgÀ½î UÁæªÀÄ, ªÉÄnæ ¥ÉÆøïÖ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ£ÁßV F
PÀÆqÀ¯Éà eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀzÀªÀgÉUÉ £ÁªÀĤzÉÃð±À£À ªÀiÁqÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
P.R. 437
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
f.J¸ï. gÀªÀÄtgÉrØ
«±ÉõÀ PÀvÀðªÁå¢üPÁj ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀzÀ¤«ÄvÀÛ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ dAn PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÉ.
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARIAT
CORRIGENDUM
No. HFW 163 RGU 2013, BANGALORE, DATED 02-07-2013
The Government of Karnataka have notified the seat matrix for MBBS and BDS Courses vide Notification No. HFW 163 RGU 2013, dated 01-07-2013. In the Annexure-VI to the said notification at
Sl.No. 3 and 23 for the words and figures, the corrected words and figures shall be read as shown in the Annexure to this corrigendum.
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
V. SAIBABA,
Under Secretary to the Government,
Health and Family Welfare Department. (Medical Education).
CORRIGENDUM TO THE ANNEXURE TO THE NOTIFICATION NO. HFW 163 RGU 2013, DATED 02-07-2013
Sl.
No.
Name of the College
Govt
seats
GMG
GMR
GM
KM
IG
IR
I KM
2A
G
2A
R
2A
KM
2B
G
2B
R
2B
KM
3A
G
3A
R
3A
KM
3B
G
3B
R
3B
KM
SC
G
SC
R
SC
KM
ST
G
ST
R
ST
KM
Total
Seats
3
Bapuji Dental College,
Davangere
34
13
3
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
34
23
Krishnadevaraya
College of Dental
Sciences, Bangalore
20
7
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
20
PR. 421
SC. 200
V. SAIBABA,
Under Secretary to the Government,
Health and Family Welfare Department. (Medical Education).
¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, WÀlPÀ-2, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ