(481)
¨sÁUÀ 1
gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ
J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
¸ÉÃ¥ÀðqÉ
¸ÀASÉå: DE 265 ¸ÉÃ-2 2016, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 20-09-2016.
¢£ÁAPÀ: 14-6-2012gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (IX) £ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɸÀÄvÀÛ, ¸ÀzÀj DzÉñÀzÀ°è£À
C£ÀħAzsÀzÀ “Police Department ” ²Ã¶ðPÉAiÀÄ°è£À PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: 22 (ix) (b) gÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ F PɼÀV£À £ÀªÀÄÆzÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¹ N¢PÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
c) Superintendent of Police (Non IPS)
1800
d) Deputy Superintendent of Police
1550
e) Police Inspector
1250
f) RPI
1250
g) DDP
1800
h) ADP
1550
i) Lecturer
1400
j) PSI
1150
k) RSI
1150
l) ASI
1150
m) ARSI
850
n) Swimming Instructor
1300
o) PT Teacher
1300
p) Karate teacher
1300
q) Computer Instructor
650
r) FSL Technician
650
F DzÉñÀªÀÅ vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
PR. 102
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðP E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
¸ÀA¥ÀÄl 152
Volume 152
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017 (ªÉʱÁR 21, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1939)
Bengaluru, Thursday, May 11, 2017 ( Vaishakha 21, Shaka Varsha 1939)
¸ÀAaPÉ 19
Issue 19
482
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
¸ÉÃ¥ÀðqÉ
¸ÀASÉå: DE 94 ¸ÉÃ-2 2016, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28-09-2016.
¢£ÁAPÀ: 14-6-2012gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (IX) ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÉÃ¥ÀðqÉ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 12
J¸ïDgï¦ (IX), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-9-2015£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɸÀÄvÀÛ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-9-2015gÀ ¸ÉÃ¥ÀðqÉ DzÉñÀzÀ PÀæ.¸ÀA: 26(2)(vi)
DPAR(Accounts-3) ²Ã¶ðPÉAiÀÄ°è£À £ÀªÀÄÆzÀÄUÀ¼À £ÀAvÀgÀ F PɼÀV£À £ÀªÀÄÆzÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¹ N¢PÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
Karnataka Government Secretariat
26 (2)(vii) DPAR (Accounts)- D Section
Sl.No
Name of the post
Rate of Special Allowance per month
(`)
1.
Section Officer - 1 post
250
2.
Assistant - 2 post
175
3.
Dalayat/Jamedar- 1 post
100
F DzÉñÀªÀÅ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-01-2016 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
PR. 103
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðP E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
FINANCE SECRETARIAT
Sub:
Grant of additional increment to Government servants who continue in the same post for 25/30 years
without a single promotion –Stepping up of pay of senior Government servant – reg.
Read:
(1) G.O. No. FD 12 SRP 2012(VIII), dated 14
th June 2012.
(2) G.O.No.FD 30 SRP 2012, dated 31
st January 2014
Preamble:
In Government Order dated 14
th June 2012 read at (1) above, it was ordered that a Government servant holding a post in any
one of the first 15 scales of pay who has continued or who continues in the same post for a period of 25 and 30 years without a single
promotion in the entire service shall be granted 2
nd and 3
rd additional increment in the scale of pay of the post held by him or in the
selection time scale of pay or senior scale of pay thereof, as the case may be, with effect from 1-4-2012 or from the date from which he
completes 25 and 30 years of service whichever is later.
In Government Order dated 31
st January 2014 read at(2) above the benefits of TBA, Senior Scale of Pay and Additional
Increments were extended to Government servants holding posts in 16
th , 17
th and 18
th scales of pay under the KCS (Revised Pay)
Rules 2012.
It has now come to the notice of Government that a Government servant who gets regular promotion before the completion of
the period of service of 25/30 years prescribed for grant of 2
nd and 3
rd additional increment, in some cases, draws pay lower than that of
his junior who gets regular promotion after 25 and 30 years of service i.e., after getting the benefit of additional increment contemplated
in Government Orders dated 14
th June 2012 and 31
st January 2014. Rectification of this type of anomaly has been considered by the
Government and accordingly the following orders are issued.
GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. FD 32 SRP 2016, BENGALURU, DATED: 26
th SEPTEMBER 2016.
Government are now pleased to order that where a Government servant holding a post in any one of the first 18 scales of pay
gets promotion before completion of the period of service of 25/30 years prescribed for grant of 2
nd and 3
rd additional increment and
draws pay lower than that of his junior in the same cadre on account of the junior Government servant getting the benefit of 2
nd & 3
rd
additional increment for 25 /30 years of service respectively as well as regular promotion, the pay of the senior Government servant
shall be stepped up to that of the junior Government servant subject to the following conditions:-
(i)
Both the senior Government servant and junior Government servant should belong to the same cadre;
(ii)
On the date of promotion of the senior or on the date on which the junior was allowed additional increment for 25
years of service, the senior Government servant should have drawn pay equal to or higher than that of the junior
Government servant;
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
483
(iii) The anomaly of the senior Government servant drawing pay lower than that of the junior Government servant
should have occurred only on account of his getting the benefit of regular promotion before grant of 2
nd and 3
rd
additional increments for 25 and 30 years of service respectively and that of the promotion of the junior after getting
the benefit of additional increments for 25 and 30 years of service.
The next annual increment of the senior Government servant will accrue after the completion of the incremental period of
twelve months.
The Appointing Authority shall be competent to issue orders of stepping up of pay under this order.
The order of stepping up of pay shall be in the proforma appended to this order and a copy of such order shall be endorsed to
the Accountant General in Karnataka, the Secretary to Government (Expenditure), Finance Department and the Secretary of the
concerned administrative department.
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
K.S. RAJALAKSHMI,
Under Secretary to Government,
Finance Department (Services-2).
PROFORMA
Office Order No.
Dated:
The pay of Sri/Smt ……….. (Name and Designation) working in the office of the ……………is stepped up to that of his/her
junior Sri/Smt ……………… (Name and Designation) working in the office of the ………………
……………… with effect from ………………………
The next increment of Sri/Smt.…… (Name and Designation) will accrue on ……………………………
The details of the pay drawn by the senior Government servant and the junior Government servant are given below:-
Senior Government
servant
Junior
Government
servant
1.
Name and Designation with pay scale
2.
Date of regular appointment to Government Service
3.
The post held on 1
st April 2012 and the pay scale
4.
Sl.No. in the Gradation List
5.
The pay drawn form 01.07.2005 onwards.(including the
increment if due on 01.07.2005)
6.
The date of promotion of the seniorGovernment servant to the
next higher post before completion of 25/30 years of service.
7.
The date on which the junior Government servant was allowed
the benefit of additional increment for 25/30years of service.
8.
The date of promotion of the Junior to the next higher post
9.
Date from which stepping up of pay is admissible to the senior
Government servant
PR. 104
SC. 50
APPOINTIAUTHORITY
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
ªÀÄ£ÉÆêÉÊPÀ®åvɬÄAzÀ §¼À®ÄwÛzÀÄÝ (Autism, Cerebral Palsy or Mental retardation) «±ÉõÀ/¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå
±Á¯ÉUÀ¼À°è ²PÀët ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀ ªÀÄPÀ̽gÀĪÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ²PÀët ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ ¸Ë®¨sÀåªÀ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (XIII), ¢: 10-6-2013
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:-
G¯ÉèÃR (1)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (XIII), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-6-2013 gÀ°è «±ÉõÀ
¸ÀAAiÉÆÃfvÀ CxÀªÁ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ±Á¯ÉUÀ¼À°è MAzÀ£Éà vÀgÀUÀw¬ÄAzÀ ºÀ£ÉßgÀqÀ£Éà vÀgÀUÀwAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀjµÀ×
484
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
18 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À ªÀAiÉÆëÄw «ÄÃgÀzÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀ®A©vÀ CAzsÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ZÀ®£À ªÉÊPÀ®åvÉ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ªÀÄPÀ̽UÉ ²PÀëtPÁÌV MAzÀÄ
ªÀÄUÀÄ«UÉ ªÀiÁ¹PÀ vÀ¯Á gÀÆ.500/- gÀAvÉ UÀjµÀ× JgÀqÀÄ ªÀÄPÀ̽UÉ ²PÀët ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CzÀgÀ°è «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ µÀgÀvÀÄÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÉƼÀ¥ÀlÄÖ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjUÉ »A§j¸À®Ä DzÉò¹zÉ.
¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-6-2013gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (XIII) gÀ°è M¼ÀUÉÆArgÀĪÀ ²PÀët ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ ¸Ë®¨sÀåªÀ£ÀÄß
ªÀÄ£ÉÆêÉÊPÀ®åvɬÄAzÀ §¼À®ÄwÛzÀÄÝ (Autism, Cerebral Palsy or Mental retardation), «±ÉõÀ ¸ÀAAiÉÆÃfvÀ (Integrated) CxÀªÁ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå
±Á¯ÉUÀ¼À°è MAzÀ£Éà vÀgÀUÀw¬ÄAzÀ ºÀ£ÉßgÀqÀ£Éà vÀgÀUÀwAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀ®A©vÀ ªÀÄPÀ̼À ²PÀëtPÀÆÌ
¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÉA§ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹ PɼÀV£ÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 35 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 20-10-2016.
¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-6-2013gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (XIII) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ ²PÀët ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ ¸Ë®¨sÀåªÀÅ
ªÀÄ£ÉÆêÉÊPÀ®åvɬÄAzÀ §¼À®ÄwÛzÀÄÝ (Autism, Cerebral Palsy or Mental retardation) , «±ÉõÀ ¸ÀAAiÉÆÃfvÀ (Integrated) CxÀªÁ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå
±Á¯ÉUÀ¼À°è MAzÀ£Éà vÀgÀUÀw¬ÄAzÀ ºÀ£ÉßgÀqÀ£Éà vÀgÀUÀwAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀjµÀ× 18 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À ªÀÄAiÉÆëÄw «ÄÃgÀzÀ gÁdå
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ CªÀ®A©vÀ ªÀÄPÀ̼À ²PÀëtPÁÌV C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ DzÉò¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012 (XIII), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-6-2013 gÀ°è «¢ü¹gÀĪÀ EvÀgÉ µÀgÀvÀÄÛ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤§AzsÀ£ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀÄ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
PR. 105
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
¸ÀªÀĪÀ¸ÀÛç ¨sÀvÉå –zÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :
1)
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 31 J¸ïDgï¦ 2007 (XI), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14-8-2008.
2)
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2010, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-05-2010.
3)
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012, (III) ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14-06-2012.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016(I) ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21£Éà £ÀªÉA§gï 2016.
¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ªÀUÀðzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ ºÁ° ¤ÃqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀĪÀ¸ÀÛç ¤ªÀðºÀuÁ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß CªÀÅUÀ¼À JzÀÄgÀÄ
vÉÆÃj¹gÀĪÀ zÀgÀzÀ°è ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹ DzÉò¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
ºÀÄzÉÝ
¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ zÀgÀ
¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ zÀgÀ
(1)
(2)
(3)
1) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¥ÉÃzɬÄAzÀ ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¸À¨ï E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgïªÀgÉUÉ
2) ¥Éưøï G¥À ¤ÃjPÀëPÀgÀÄ
3) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ
ªÀiÁ¹PÀ `.100/-
ªÀiÁ¹PÀ `.500/-
2. F DzÉñÀªÀÅ 1£Éà r¸ÉA§gï 2016 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
PR. 106
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
wzÉÆÝïÉ
¸ÀASÉå: DE 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-11-2016.
¢£ÁAPÀ 21-11-2016gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉå: DE 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 (I)gÀ PÉÆõÀ×PÀzÀ°è£À (1)£Éà CAPÀtzÀ°è£À PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå: (3) gÀ°ègÀĪÀ ‘¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ’ JA§ ¥ÀzÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÉUÉzÀÄ ºÁPÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
PR. 107
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ. (¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
485
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ««zsÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ ¸ÁjUÉ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016(II) ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21£Éà £ÀªÉA§gï 2016.
¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ªÀUÀðzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ CªÀÅUÀ¼À JzÀÄgÀÄ vÉÆÃj¹gÀĪÀ zÀgÀzÀ°è ¸ÁjUÉ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ
ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
ºÀÄzÉÝ
zÀgÀ
(1)
(2)
(1) C£ÀÄAiÀiÁ¬ÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
(2) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¥ÉÃzɬÄAzÀ ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¸À¨ï E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgïªÀgÉUÉ
(3) ¥Éưøï G¥À ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ
(4) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ
ªÀiÁ¹PÀ `.600/-
2. F DzÉñÀªÀÅ 1£Éà r¸ÉA§gï 2016 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
PR. 108
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ««zsÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ PÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (Hardship Allowance)
ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 (III), ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 21£Éà £ÀªÉA§gï 2016
¥Éưøï E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ªÀUÀðzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ CªÀÅUÀ¼À JzÀÄgÀÄ vÉÆÃj¹gÀĪÀ zÀgÀzÀ°è PÀµÀÖ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
(Hardship Allowance) ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
ºÀÄzÉÝ
zÀgÀ
(1)
(2)
(1) C£ÀÄAiÀiÁ¬ÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
(2) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¥ÉÃzɬÄAzÀ ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¸À¨ï E£ïì¥ÉPÀÖgïªÀgÉUÉ
(3) ¥Éưøï G¥À ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ
(4) ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ
ªÀiÁ¹PÀ `. 1000/-
2. F DzÉñÀªÀÅ 1£Éà r¸ÉA§gï 2016 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
PR. 109
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ. (¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
wzÉÆÝïÉ
¸ÀASÉå: DE 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21-11-2016.
¢£ÁAPÀ 21-11-2016gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉå: DE 47 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 (II) ªÀÄvÀÄÛ (III) UÀ¼À°è£À PÉÆõÀ×PÀzÀ°è (1)£ÉÃ
CAPÀtzÀ°è£À PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå: (4) gÀ°ègÀĪÀ ‘¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ’ JA§ ¥ÀzÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÉUÉzÀÄ ºÁPÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
PR. 110
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ. (¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
486
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¥ÉÃzÉUÀ½UÉ ¥Éưøï PÁåAnãïUÀ¼À°è£À RjâUÉ VAT ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:-
ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀÄÄRå ªÀÄAwæAiÀĪÀgÀÄ 2015-16gÀ DAiÀĪÀåAiÀÄ ¨sÁµÀtzÀ°è gÁdåzÀ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¥ÉÃzÉUÀ½UÉ C£ÀÄPÀÆ®ªÁUÀĪÀAvÉ ¥Éưøï
PÁåAnãïUÀ¼À°è ¥Àæw wAUÀ½UÉ vÀ¯Á gÀÆ.3000/- UÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ Rjâ ªÉÄð£À ªÀiÁgÁl vÉjUÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄgÀÄ¥ÁªÀw¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ JAzÀÄ
WÉÆö¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 9 J¸ïDgï¦ 2017, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 7£Éà ªÀiÁZïð 2017.
¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ¥ÉÃzÉUÀ½UÉ ¥Éưøï PÁåAnãïUÀ¼À°è£À Rjâ ªÉÄð£À VAT vÉjUÉAiÀÄ §zÀ°UÉ VAT ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉæöʪÀiÁ¹PÀ `.250/-gÀ
zÀgÀzÀ°è ªÁ¶ðPÀ `.1000/-UÀ¼À UÀjµÀÖ «ÄwUÉƼÀ¥ÀlÄÖ 1£Éà K¦æ¯ï 2017 jAzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀªÀgÉUÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä
¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
PR. 111
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ. (¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
FINANCE SECRETARIAT
Sub: Grant of VAT Allowance to Police Constables of the Police Department for purchases made from the Police Canteens - reg.
PREAMBLE:
The Hon’ble Chief Minister in the Budget Speech 2015-16 had announced the Government’s decision to provide the facility of
VAT reimbursement on purchases made from Police Canteens upto Rs.3000/- per month for each Police Constable. Accordingly the
following orders are issued.
GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. FD 9 SRP 2017, BENGALURU, DATED: 7
th MARCH 2017.
Government are pleased to grant VAT Allowance to Police Constables at the rate of Rs.250/- per quarter subject to a
maximum of Rs.1000/- per annum in lieu of VAT paid by Police Constables for purchases made from Police Canteens with effect from
1
st April 2017 and until further orders.
PR. 112
SC. 50
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
K.S. RAJALAKSHMI,
Under Secretary to Government,
Finance Department (Services-2).
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
MAzÉà E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ PɼÀUÉ f¯Éè¬ÄAzÀ f¯ÉèUÉ/MAzÀÄ eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀ¢AzÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀzÀ
CzÉà ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ ¸Àé-EZÉÒ¬ÄAzÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÉƼÀÄîªÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ »A¢£À ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÉõÀ×vÉUÉ
¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀzÉ PÁ®§zÀÞ ªÀÄÄA§rÛ, »jAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ºÁUÀÆ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ½UÉ
¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ- ªÀiÁ¥ÁðqÀÄ DzÉñÀ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1) ¸À.C.eÁÕ ¸ÀA: DE 105 J¸ïDgï¦ (¹J¸ï¹) 82, ¢£ÁAPÀ 08.06.1983
2) ¸À.D.¸ÀA: DE 25 J¸ïDgï¦ 1991, ¢£ÁAPÀ 29.10.1991
3) ¸À.D.¸ÀA: DE 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2002, ¢£ÁAPÀ 09.05.2002
4) ¸À.D.¸ÀA: DE 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012(VIII), ¢£ÁAPÀ 14.06.2012
5) ¸À.D.¸ÀA: DE 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ 05.10.2014
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:-
PÁ®§zÀÞ ªÀÄÄA§rÛ/ »jAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛ ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À ªÀÄAdÆgÁwUÁV ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ
10/15/20/25/30 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À ¤UÀ¢vÀ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß JtÂPÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÁUÀ PÁ® PÁ®PÉÌ eÁjAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ (eÉõÀ×vÉ)
¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½, 1957 gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ eÉõÀ×vÉ ¤zsÀðj¸ÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀPÉÌ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À®àqÀĪÀ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁvÀæ ¯ÉPÀÌPÉÌ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÁÝVzÉ.
ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀæ.¸ÀA.(5) gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 05-10-2014gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀzÀ°è ¸ÀéAvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ f¯Áè ªÀÄlÖzÀ
eÉõÀ×vÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ MAzÉà E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è£À MAzÀÄ eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀ¢AzÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀzÀ°è£À CzÉÃ
ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÀÄ »A¢£À eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀzÀ°è ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÉõÀ×vÉUÉ ¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀzÉ, PÁ®§zÀÞ
ªÀÄÄA§rÛ, »jAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛUÀ¼À ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À ªÀÄAdÆgÁwUÉ MªÉÄä ªÀiÁvÀæ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À PÀ°à¸À¯ÁVzÉ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀzÀj ¢£ÁAPÀ 05-10-2014gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¨sÁUÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 2gÀ (i) jAzÀ (iv)gÀªÀgÉUÉ ¸ÀÆa¹gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è F
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
487
¸Ë®¨sÀåªÀÅ C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®èªÉAzÀÄ DzÉò¹zÉ. F µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÊ©qÀĪÀAvÉ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ dAn ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£Á
¸À«ÄwUÉ ªÀÄ£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ dAn ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£Á ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆArgÀĪÀ ¤tðAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 8£Éà ªÀiÁZïð 2017
dAn ¸ÀªÀiÁ¯ÉÆÃZÀ£Á ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ 05-10-2014gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014gÀ DzÉñÀ ¨sÁUÀzÀ
PÀArPÉ 2 £ÀÄß PÉÊ©qÀĪÀAvÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆArgÀĪÀ ¤tðAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ:-
(i)
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ 05-10-2014gÀ DzÉñÀ ¨sÁUÀzÀ PÀArPÉ 2 £ÀÄß PÉÊ©qÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
(ii) ¸ÀéAvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ MAzÉà E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀiÁ£À ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¨ÉÃgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ
ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÀÄ »A¢£À ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÉõÀ×vÉUÉ ¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀzÉ, PÁ®§zÀÞ
ªÀÄÄA§rÛ, »jAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛ ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À ªÀÄAdÆgÁwUÁV ªÀiÁvÀæ ¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
(iii) ¸ÀéAvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ MAzÀÄ E¯ÁSɬÄAzÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀiÁ£À ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è CªÀgÀÄ »A¢£À E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÉõÀ×vÉUÉ
¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀzÉ, PÁ®§zÀÞ ªÀÄÄA§rÛ, »jAiÀÄ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛ ¸Ë®¨sÀåUÀ¼À ªÀÄAdÆgÁwUÁV ªÀiÁvÀæ
¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
2. G½zÀAvÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ 05-10-2014gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀzÀ°è£À EvÀgÉ µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀÄ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄvÀÛªÉ.
3. F ¸Ë®¨sÀåªÀÅ ¢£ÁAPÀ 11-02-2011 jAzÀ ®¨sÀåªÁUÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
PR. 113
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
wzÀÄÝ¥Àr
¸ÀASÉå: DE 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 23-03-2017.
¢£ÁAPÀ 08-03-2017gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 13 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014 gÀ°è “¢£ÁAPÀ 05-10-2014”gÀ ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ
JAzÀÄ J¯Éè°è £ÀªÀÄÆzÁVzÉAiÉÆà C°è “¢£ÁAPÀ 05-09-2014” JA§ÄzÁV w¢Ý N¢PÉƼÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
PR. 114
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
CVß±ÁªÀÄPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÀÄvÀÄð ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¹§âA¢UÀ½UÉ ¤ÃqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀĪÀ¸ÀÛç ¤ªÀðºÀuÁ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ
zÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :
(1) ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 31 J¸ïDgï¦ 2007, (XI) ¢£ÁAPÀ 14-8-2008.
(2) ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2010, ¢£ÁAPÀ 18-05-2010.
(3) ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012, (III) ¢£ÁAPÀ 14-06-2012.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 7 J¸ïDgï¦ 2017, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 23£Éà ªÀiÁZïð 2017
CVß±ÁªÀÄPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ vÀÄvÀÄð ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ªÀUÀðzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ ºÁ° ¤ÃqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀĪÀ¸ÀÛç ¤ªÀðºÀuÁ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
CªÀÅUÀ¼À JzÀÄgÀÄ vÉÆÃj¹gÀĪÀ zÀgÀzÀ°è ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹ DzÉò¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
ºÀÄzÉÝ
¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ zÀgÀ
¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ zÀgÀ
(1)
(2)
(3)
CVß±ÁªÀÄPÀgÀ ºÀÄzÉݬÄAzÀ ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ CVß±ÁªÀÄPÀ oÁuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ.
ªÀiÁ¹PÀ `.100/-
ªÀiÁ¹PÀ `.500/-
488
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
2. F DzÉñÀªÀÅ 1£Éà K¦æ¯ï 2017 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
PR. 115
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðP E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î, ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ zÀeÉð ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ, f¯Áè «ªÀiÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À PÀbÉÃj, «eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ, EªÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ-zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¹ CAwªÀÄ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :
1)
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 39 PÀ«E 2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ:25.09.2012.
2) «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ EªÀgÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå:
LOK/INQ/14-A/397/2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 09.10.2012.
3) C¥ÀgÀ ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ («ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-1), PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ EªÀgÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢
¢£ÁAPÀ:17.10.2016.
4) ªÀiÁ£Àå G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ-1 gÀªÀgÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì ªÀiÁrzÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå: LOK/ARE-1/INQ/14-
A/397/2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 20.10.2016.
5) D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ JgÀqÀ£Éà PÁgÀt PÉüÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃnøï eÁj ªÀiÁrzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 22.10.2016.
6) JgÀqÀ£Éà PÁgÀt PÉüÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃnùUÉ D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶ ¢£ÁAPÀ:
02.12.2016.
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:-
²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î, ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À., PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðj «ªÀiÁ E¯ÁSÉ, EªÀgÀÄ f¯Áè «ªÀiÁ PÀbÉÃj, ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ E°è
PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÀÝ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¢.26.09.2011 gÀAzÀÄ ²æà PÁqÀAiÀÄå, ±Á¯Á ²PÀëPÀgÀÄ EªÀgÀ «ªÀiÁ ¥Á°¹UÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄAdÆgÁVzÀÝ
gÀÆ.45,730/- ¸Á®zÀ°è G½zÀ gÀÆ.14,270/-UÀ¼À ¸Á® ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV gÀÆ.200/-UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ®AZÀªÁV ¨ÉÃrPɬÄlÄÖ CPÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£É
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ªÉüÉAiÀÄ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥ÉưøÀjUÉ ¹QÌ©¢ÝgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. F ¸ÀA§AzsÀ EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²¸ÀÄÛ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À®Ä PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ
¸ÉêÁ(ªÀ.¤.&ªÉÄÃ) ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 11 gÀAvÉ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqɸÀ®Ä ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß EzÉà ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 14-J gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ
ªÉÄÃ¯É (1) gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢.25.09.2012 gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛjUÉ ªÀ»¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ. G¥À
¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É (2)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ:09.10.2012gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁV £ÉêÀÄPÀUÉÆAqÀ C¥ÀgÀ ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ,
«ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-1 CªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É (3)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 17.10.2016gÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢ ¸À°è¹, DgÉÆÃ¥À PÀÄjvÀÄ F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¤tðAiÀÄ
¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
«ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀgÁzÀ ²æà PÁqÀAiÀÄå, ±Á¯Á ²PÀëPÀgÀÄ, ¤zÉÆä, «eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ EªÀgÀ «ªÀiÁ
¥Á°¹UÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄAdÆgÁVzÀÝ gÀÆ.45,730/- ¸Á®zÀ°è G½zÀ gÀÆ.14,270/-UÀ¼À EªÀgÀ ¸Á® ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV gÀÆ.200/-UÀ¼À£ÀÄß CPÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉUÉ ¨ÉÃrPɬÄnÖzÀÄÝ ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀjUÉ ºÀt ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ EµÀÖ«®èzÀ PÁgÀt ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀ°è zÀÆgÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ, CzÀgÀAvÉ EªÀgÀ
«gÀÄzÀÞ mÁæöå¥ï ¥ÀAZÀ£ÁªÉÄ vÀAiÀiÁj¹zÀÄÝ, ¢.26.09.2011 gÀAzÀÄ ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ PÀbÉÃjUÉ ºÉÆÃV D¥Á¢vÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ PÉ®¸À
ªÀiÁrPÉÆqÀĪÀAvÉ «£ÀAw¹zÀÄÝ, D¥Á¢vÀgÀÄ ¥ÀÄ£À: CPÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£É ¨ÉÃrPɬÄlÄÖ gÀÆ.200/-UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. PÀÆqÀ¯ÉÃ
¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥ÉưøÀjUÉ ¸ÀAeÉÕAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ, ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥ÉưøÀgÀÄ D¥Á¢vÀgÀ£ÀÄß gÉqï-ºÁåAqÉqï DV
¸ÉgÉ»r¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀÄ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è D¥Á¢vÀgÀ£ÀÄß »rzÀÄ CªÀgÀ JgÀqÀÄ PÉÊUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÆÃrAiÀÄA PÁ¨ÉÆÃð£ÉÃmï zÁæªÀtzÀ°è
vÉƼÉzÁUÀ JgÀqÀÄ PÉÊUÀ¼ÀÄ UÀįÁ© §tÚPÉÌ wgÀÄVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. D¥Á¢vÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ¸Á©ÃvÀÄ¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è
mÁæöå¥ï ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è D¥Á¢vÀgÀÄ ¦üAiÀiÁðzÀÄzÁgÀgÁzÀ ²æà PÁqÀAiÀÄå, ±Á¯Á ²PÀëPÀgÀÄ EªÀgÀ «ªÀiÁ ¥Á°¹UÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ªÀÄAdÆgÁVzÀÝ
gÀÆ.45,730/- ¸Á®zÀ°è G½zÀ `.14,270/-UÀ¼À ¸Á® ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV `.200/-UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ®AZÀªÁV ¨ÉÃrPɬÄlÄÖ CPÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£É
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ªÉüÉAiÀÄ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ ¥ÉưøÀjUÉ ¹QÌ©¢ÝgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ EªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥À ¸Á©ÃvÁVgÀĪÀÅzÁV ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
F «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ªÀiÁ£Àå G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ-1, CªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É (4)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ.20.10.2016gÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸Àì£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹, EªÀgÀÄ vÀ¦àvÀ¸ÀÜgÉAzÀÄ ¤zsÀðj¹ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉêÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
ªÉÄîä£À«) ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 8(vi)gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉêɬÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀÈwÛUÉƽ¸ÀĪÀ zÀAqÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¢ü¸À®Ä ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì
ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ G¥À¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ-1 CªÀgÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¹ì£ÉÆqÀ£É ªÉÄïÉ(6)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ.02.12.2016gÀ JgÀqÀ£ÉÃ
PÁgÀt PÉüÀĪÀ £ÉÆÃnøÀ£ÀÄß D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ ²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î, ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À.,gÀªÀjUÉ ¤Ãr CªÀÅUÀ¼À §UÉÎ CºÀªÁ®Ä EzÀÝ°è ¸À°è¸À®Ä
CªÀPÁ±À PÀ°à¸À¯Á¬ÄvÀÄ.
²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î, ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À., EªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå(7)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ.02.12.2016gÀ GvÀÛgÀzÀ°è
DgÉÆævÀ, F PɼÀPÀAqÀ CºÀªÁ®Ä ¸À°è¹zÁÝgÉ:
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
489
DgÉÆævÀgÁzÀ ²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À., PÀ.¸À.«.E., EªÀgÀÄ «eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ f¯Áè
«ªÀiÁ PÀbÉÃjUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À PÁ® PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¹zÀÄÝ, CªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÀÆgÀÄUÀ½®èzÉ CªÀgÀ
¸ÉÃªÉ PÀ¼ÀAPÀ gÀ»vÀªÁVzÀÄÝ, CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀvÁåA±À«®èzÉ GzÉÝñÀ¥ÀƪÀðPÀªÁV C©üAiÉÆÃUÀUÉƽ¸À¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ
JAzÀÄ w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. EzÀgÀ°è zÀÆgÀzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛ C¢üPÁjUÀ¼À zÀÆgÀÄzÉÝñÀ«zÀÄÝ, PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ
zÀÄgÀÄ¥ÀAiÉÆÃUÀªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ D¥Á¢¸ÀÄvÁÛ, D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ PÀÄlÄA§PÉÌ DyðPÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀiÁ£À¹PÀªÁV
¸ÀªÀiÁdzÀ°è PÀ¼ÀAPÉÆ̼ÀUÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. PÉ®ªÀÅ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃT¸ÀÄvÁÛ ºÁUÀÆ
®AZÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÀªÀÄUÉ zÀÆgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ §®ªÀAvÀªÁV vÀªÀÄä eÉé£À°è EnÖgÀĪÀŪÀzÁV ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀÄvÁÛ,
vÀ¤SÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ°è£À CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤gÁPÀj¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁ£Àå ¸ÀªÉÇÃZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀiÁ£Àå GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À wÃ¥ÀÄðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
G¯ÉèÃT¸ÀÄvÁÛ, ¸ÀzÀj wÃ¥ÀÄðUÀ¼À°è D¥Á¢vÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ EgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸Á©ÃvÀÄ ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ°è ¥Áæ¹PÀÆåµÀ£ï
«¥sÀ®ªÁV D¥Á¢vÀgÀ£ÀÄß RįÁ¸ÉUÉƽ¹gÀĪÀ ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wæð£ÀAvÉ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉUÀ¼À
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÊ©qÀĪÀAvÉ vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀ ¤tðAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß G¯ÉèÃT¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ CAwªÀĪÁV
wêÀiÁ𤹠RįÁ¸ÉUÉƽ¹gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è MAzÉà vÀgÀºÀzÀ D¥ÁzÀ£ÉUÀ½UÉ JgÀqÀÄ ¸ÀªÀiÁ£ÀAvÀgÀ «ZÁgÀuÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¤tðAiÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
PÉ.¹.J¸ï (£ÀqÀvÉ)¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1966 gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 3(1)(i) jAzÀ (iii) gÀrAiÀÄ°è D¥Á¢vÀ £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ®AZÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¹éÃPÀj¹
PÀvÀðªÀå
ZÀÄåw
J¸ÀVgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ
zÀÄ£ÀðqÀvÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ
vÀ¤SÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À
CA±ÀUÀ¼À°è
zÀÈqsÀ¥Àr¸À®Ä
¸ÁzsÀåªÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¸ÀÄvÁÛ, PÁ£ÀƤ£À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀð¤ÃAiÀĪÀ®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
ªÉÄîÌAqÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt¹, vÀ¤SÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt¹ G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÊ©lÄÖ,
DgÉÆævÀgÀ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀÄzÀ »vÀzÀȶ֬ÄAzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɸÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ EzÉà DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛzÀ «±ÉõÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt ¸ÀA.8/2012gÀ°è «±ÉõÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è
¥ÀæPÀgÀt zÁR¯ÁVzÀÄÝ, ¢.12.11.2014gÀ°è ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß EvÀåxÀð¥Àr¹ ²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆßýî, ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À., «ªÀiÁ E¯ÁSÉ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß
RįÁ¸ÉUÉƽ¹gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ¨ÁQ EzÁÝUÀ CzÉÃ
DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É ²¹Û£À PÀæªÀÄ:E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqɸÀ§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ. £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ºÀÆqÀĪÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ°è
ºÀÆqÀĪÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄUÀ¼ÁVªÉ. F «µÀAiÀÄzÀ°è ¢.27.09.1996gÀAzÀÄ ¸ÀªÉÇÃðZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ gÁd¸ÁÜ£ï ¸ÀPÁðgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ
©.PÉ.«ÄãÁ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÀgÀÄ(1966)gÀ PÉøÀ¸ï 471 ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è wÃ¥ÀÄð ¤ÃrzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀªÉÇÃðZÀÒ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ wæð£ÀAvÉ
PÉÊUÉƼÀÄîªÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ¸ÀA:r¦JDgï 5 ¸ÉÃE« 96, ¢.02.01.1997gÀ°è ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
ªÉÄîÌAqÀ «±ÉèõÀuÉAiÀÄ »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î, ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À., PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðj «ªÀiÁ E¯ÁSÉ, EªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ
«ªÀgÀuÉAiÀÄÄ vÀȦÛPÀgÀªÁV®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ M¦àPÉƼÀî®Ä CºÀðªÀ®è. £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ¥Á°¹ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß EvÀåxÀð¥Àr¸À®Ä gÀÆ.200/-UÀ¼À CPÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£É
¥ÀqÉzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀªÀÅ ¸Á©ÃvÁVzÉ JA§ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À ¤tðAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀiÁ£Àå G¥À ¯ÉÆÃPÁAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ EªÀgÀ ²¥sÁgÀ¸ÀÄì M¦àPÉÆAqÀÄ,
zÀAqÀ£É «¢ü¸À®Ä ¤tð¬Ä¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ªÀÄÄA¢£ÀAvÉ DzÉò¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå:DE 39 PÀ«E 2012, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:22.03.2017.
¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjÃPÀ ¸ÉêÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄîä£À«)
¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ 1957gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 8(vi)gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ²æà ªÀÄÄvÀÛtÚ ±ÀgÀt¥Àà PÀ£ÉÆß½î, ¥Àæ.zÀ.¸À., PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¸ÀPÁðj «ªÀiÁ E¯ÁSÉ, EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß vÀPÀët¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÉêɬÄAzÀ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀÈwÛUÉƽ¹zÉ.
PR. 116
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
f. ±À²zsÀgï,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄAUÀqÀUÀ¼ÀÄ)
FINANCE SECRETARIAT
Sub:-
Dearness Allowance to Teaching Staff on UGC/AICTE/ICAR scales of pay and Judicial
Officers/Pensioners on NJPC pay scales- Revision of rates.
READ: -
(1) G.O. No. FD 10 SRP 2013, dated 20-05-2013.
(2) G.O. No. FD 12 SRP 2013 (II), dated 12-06-2013.
(3) G.O. No. FD 22 SRP 2013, dated 10-10-2013.
(4) G.O. No. FD 07 SRP 2014, dated 11-04-2014.
(5) G.O. No. FD 18 SRP 2014, dated 01-10-2014.
(6) G.O. No. FD 12 SRP 2015, dated 08-05-2015.
490
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
(7) G.O. No.FD 19 SRP 2015, dated: 08-10-2015.
(8) G.O. No.FD 18 SRP 2016, dated: 18-04-2016.
(9) G.O. No.FD 34 SRP 2016 dated: 28-10-2016.
GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. FD 19 SRP 2017, BENGALURU, DATED 4
TH APRIL 2017
Government are pleased to sanction increase in the rates of Dearness Allowance to Teaching Staff who are on
UGC/AICTE/ICAR scales of pay and to Judicial Officers on NJPC pay scales from the existing 132% to 136% of the basic pay with
effect from 1
st January 2017.
2. For the purpose of this order, the term ‘Basic Pay’ means, the pay drawn by a Government employee in the UGC/AICTE/ICAR and
NJPC scales of pay applicable to the post held by him.
3. Basic Pay shall not include any other emoluments.
4. Government are also pleased to sanction increase in the rates of Dearness Allowance to NJPC Pensioners/Family Pensioners from
the existing 132% to 136% of the basic pension/family pension with effect from 1
st January 2017.
5. The increase in Dearness Allowance admissible under this order is payable in cash until further orders.
6. The payment on account of Dearness Allowance involving fractions of 50 paise and above shall be rounded off to the next rupee
and fractions less than 50 paise shall be ignored.
7. The Dearness Allowance will be shown as a distinct element of remuneration and will not be treated as pay for any purpose.
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
G.B. HEMANNA,
Deputy Secretary to Government,
Finance Department (Services-2).
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
AiÀÄÄf¹/L¹JDgï/JL¹nE ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°è ªÉÃvÀ£À ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¨ÉÆÃzsÀPÀ ªÀUÀðzÀªÀjUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
J£ïeɦ¹ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁAUÀ C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ/J£ïeɦ¹ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀjUÉ vÀÄnÖ
¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :
(1) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 10 J¸ïDgï¦ 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 20-05-2013.
(2) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2013(II), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12-06-2013.
(3) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 22 J¸ïDgï¦ 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 10-10-2013.
(4) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 07 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 11-04-2014.
(5) ¸À.C. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 18 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 01-10-2014.
(6) ¸À.C. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2015, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-05-2015.
(7) ¸À.C. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 19 J¸ïDgï¦ 2015 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08-10-2015.
(8) ¸À.C. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 18 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18-04-2016
(9) ¸À.C. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 34 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 28-10-2016.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 19 J¸ïDgï¦ 2017, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 4£Éà K¦æ¯ï 2017.
AiÀÄÄf¹/JL¹nE/L¹JDgï ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°ègÀĪÀ ¨ÉÆÃzsÀPÀ ¹§âA¢UÀ½UÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ J£ïeɦ¹ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁAUÀ
C¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ºÁ° ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ vÀÄnÖ. ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ zÀgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃ.132% jAzÀ ±ÉÃ. 136%PÉÌ ºÉaѹ ¢£ÁAPÀ 1£Éà d£ÀªÀj 2017
jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
2. F DzÉñÀzÀ GzÉÝñÀUÀ½UÁV ‘ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£À’ JAzÀgÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ zsÁgÀt ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀĪÀ
AiÀÄÄf¹/L¹JDgï/JL¹nE ªÀÄvÀÄÛ J£ïeɦ¹ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À.
3. ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£ÀPÉÌ E£ÁåªÀÅzÉà G¥À®§ÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è.
4. J£ïeɦ¹ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀgÀÄ/PÀÄlÄA§ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀjUÉ ºÁ° ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ vÀÄnÖ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ zÀgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆ® ¤ªÀÈwÛ
ªÉÃvÀ£À/PÀÄlÄA§ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃ.132% jAzÀ ±ÉÃ. 136% PÉÌ ºÉaѹ ¢£ÁAPÀ 1£Éà d£ÀªÀj 2017 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ
ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
5. F DzÉñÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÁVgÀĪÀ vÀÄnÖ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀªÀgÉUÉ £ÀUÀzÁV ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
6. vÀÄnÖ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ PÁgÀt¢AzÀ ¸ÀAzÁAiÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀĪÀ LªÀvÀÄÛ ¥ÉÊ¸É ºÁUÀÆ CzÀQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À ©ü£ÁßAPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À gÀÆ¥Á¬ÄUÉ
¥ÀÆtðUÉƽ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ LªÀvÀÄÛ ¥ÉʸÉVAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀĪÀ ©ü£ÁßAPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀqÉUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
491
7. vÀÄnÖ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ «²µÀÖ CA±ÀªÁV vÉÆÃj¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV EzÀ£ÀÄß ªÉÃvÀ£À JAzÀÄ
¥ÀjUÀt¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
PR. 117
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
f.©. ºÉêÀÄtÚ,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
FINANCE SECRETARIAT
Sub:-
Revision of the rates of Dearness Allowance-reg.
READ: -
(1) G.O. No. FD 23 SRP 2011, dated: 15.06.2011
(2) G.O. No. FD 07 SRP 2012, dated: 21.04.2012
(3) G.O. No. FD 17 SRP 2012, dated: 14.05.2012
(4) G.O. No. FD 25 SRP 2012, dated: 17.10.2012
(5) G.O. No. FD 09 SRP 2013, dated: 08.05.2013
(6) G.O. No. FD 21 SRP 2013, dated: 03.10.2013
(7) G.O. No. FD 5 SRP 2014, dated: 08.04.2014
(8) G.O. No. FD 17 SRP 2014 dated: 26.09.2014
(9) G.O. No. FD 11 SRP 2015 dated: 24-04-2015
(10) G.O. No. FD 18 SRP 2015 dated: 30-09-2015
(11) G.O. No. FD 12 SRP 2016 dated: 13-04-2016
(12) G.O. No. FD 33 SRP 2016 dated: 21-10-2016
(13) Representation dated: 18.03.2017 of the President, Karnataka
State Government Employees’ Association.
GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. FD 16 SRP 2017, BENGALURU, DATED 30
TH March 2017
Government are pleased to sanction increase in the rates of Dearness Allowance payable to the State Government
Employees in the Revised Pay Scales 2012 from the existing 40.25% to 43.25% of Basic Pay with effect from 1
st January 2017.
2. These orders will apply to the full time Government Employees, Employees of Zilla Panchayats, Work Charged Employees on
regular time scales of pay, full time Employees of Aided Educational Institutions and Universities who are on regular time scales of pay.
3. For the purpose of grant of Dearness Allowance, the term ‘Basic Pay’ means, pay drawn by a Government Employee in the scale
of pay applicable to the post held by him and includes:
a.
Stagnation increment, if any, granted to him above the maximum of the scale of pay.
b.
Personal Pay, if any, granted to him under sub-rule (3) of Rule 7 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Revised
Pay) Rules, 2012.
c.
Additional increment, if any, granted to him above the maximum of the scale of pay.
4. Basic Pay shall not include any emoluments other than those specified above.
5. Government are also pleased to sanction increase in the rates of Dearness Allowance from the existing 40.25% to 43.25% of the
Basic Pension/Family Pension with effect from 1
st January 2017 to the State Government Pensioners/Family Pensioners and
Pensioners/Family Pensioners of the Aided Educational Institutions whose Pension/Family Pension is paid out of the Consolidated Fund
of the State.
6. Government are also pleased to sanction increase in the rates of Dearness Allowance from the existing 40.25% to 43.25% of the
Basic Pension/Family Pension with effect from 1
st January 2017 to the Pensioners/Family Pensioners who were drawing pay in the
UGC/AICTE/ICAR scales of pay.
7. Separate orders will be issued in respect of Employees on UGC/AICTE/ICAR/NJPC scales of pay and also in respect of
NJPC Pensioners.
8. The increase in Dearness Allowance admissible under this order is payable in cash.
9. The payment on account of Dearness Allowance involving fractions of 50 paise and above shall be rounded off to the next rupee
and fractions less than 50 paise shall be ignored.
10. The Dearness Allowance will be shown as a distinct element of remuneration and will not be treated as pay for any purpose.
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
K.S. RAJALAKSHMI,
Deputy Secretary to Government,
Finance Department (Services-2).
492
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
«µÀAiÀÄ :
vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ zÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ.
NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :
(1) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 23 J¸ïDgï¦ 2011, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 15.06.2011
(2) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 07 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21.04.2012
(3) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 17 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 14.05.2012
(4) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 25 J¸ïDgï¦ 2012, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 17.10.2012
(5) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 09 J¸ïDgï¦ 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08.05.2013
(6) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 21 J¸ïDgï¦ 2013 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 03.10.2013
(7) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 5 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 08.04.2014
(8) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 17 J¸ïDgï¦ 2014 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.09.2014
(9) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 11 J¸ïDgï¦ 2015 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.04.2015
(10) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 18 J¸ïDgï¦ 2015 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 30.09.2015
(11) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 12 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13.04.2016
(12) ¸À.D. ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 33 J¸ïDgï¦ 2016 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 21.10.2016
(13) CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÀAWÀ EªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 18.03.2017.
¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: J¥sïr 16 J¸ïDgï¦ 2017, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ 30£Éà ªÀiÁZïð 2017.
gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ 2012gÀ ¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°è 1£Éà d£ÀªÀj 2017 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ vÀÄnÖ ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ
zÀgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 40.25% jAzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 43.25% PÉÌ ºÉaѹ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ f¯Áè ¥ÀAZÁAiÀÄvïUÀ¼À ¥ÀÆuÁðªÀ¢ü £ËPÀgÀjUÉ, PÁ°PÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°ègÀĪÀ ¥ÀÆuÁðªÀ¢ü ªÀPïðZÁeïð £ËPÀgÀjUÉ
ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ ¸ÀºÁAiÀiÁ£ÀÄzÁ£À ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀ ²PÀët ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À°è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀÄUÀ¼À°è PÁ°PÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°ègÀĪÀ
¥ÀÆuÁðªÀ¢ü £ËPÀgÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ F DzÉñÀ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
3. vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV “ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£À” JAzÀgÉ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ zsÁgÀt ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀĪÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ°è
¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀgÀ°è,
(C)
ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ UÀjµÀÖQÌAvÀ ºÉZÁÑV CªÀ¤UÉ ¸ÀÜVvÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÀÝgÉ, D ¸ÀÜVvÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛ,
(D)
2012gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉêÁ (¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À 7£Éà ¤AiÀĪÀÄzÀ (3)£Éà G¥À¤AiÀĪÀÄzÀ
ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ CªÀ¤UÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ ªÉÊAiÀÄQÛPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À AiÀiÁªÀÅzÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀÝgÉ, D ªÉÊAiÀÄQÛPÀ ªÉÃvÀ£À,
(E)
ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂAiÀÄ UÀjµÀÖQÌAvÀ ºÉZÁÑV CªÀ¤UÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ºÉZÀÄѪÀj ªÉÃvÀ£À §rÛ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÁzÀgÀÆ EzÀÝ°è, CªÀÅUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉÃgÀÄvÀÛªÉ.
4. ªÀÄÆ® ªÉÃvÀ£ÀPÉÌ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÀÆa¹gÀĪÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹ EvÀgÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà G¥À®§ÞUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è.
5. gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀgÀÄ/PÀÄlÄA§ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀjUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÁdåzÀ ¸ÀAavÀ ¤¢ü¬ÄAzÀ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§
¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀAvÀºÀ C£ÀÄzÁ¤vÀ ²PÀët ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀgÀÄ/PÀÄlÄA§ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÁgÀjUÉ ºÁ° ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ
vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ zÀgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆ® ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£À/PÀÄlÄA§ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 40.25% jAzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 43.25% PÉÌ ºÉaѹ ¢£ÁAPÀ 1£Éà d£ÀªÀj
2017 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
6. AiÀÄÄf¹/JL¹nE/L¹JDgï ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°è ªÉÃvÀ£À ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÀÝ ¦AZÀtÂzÁgÀgÀÄ/PÀÄlÄA§ ¦AZÀtÂzÁgÀjUÉ ºÁ° ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ
vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ zÀgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÆ® ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£À/PÀÄlÄA§ ¤ªÀÈwÛ ªÉÃvÀ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 40.25% jAzÀ ±ÉÃPÀqÀ 43.25% PÉÌ ºÉaѹ ¢£ÁAPÀ 1£Éà d£ÀªÀj
2017 jAzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ºÀ¶ð¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
7. AiÀÄÄf¹/JL¹nE/L¹JDgï/J£ïeɦ¹ ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂUÀ¼À°è ªÉÃvÀ£À ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛgÀĪÀ £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ J£ïeɦ¹ ¦AZÀtÂzÁgÀjUÉ
¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ¥ÀævÉåÃPÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
8. F DzÉñÀzÀ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÀUÀzÁV ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.
9. vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ PÁgÀt¢AzÀ ¸ÀAzÁAiÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀĪÀ LªÀvÀÄÛ ¥ÉÊ¸É ºÁUÀÆ CzÀQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À ©ü£ÁßAPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA¢£À gÀÆ¥Á¬ÄUÉ
¥ÀÆtðUÉƽ¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ LªÀvÀÄÛ ¥ÉʸÉVAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀĪÀ ©ü£ÁßAPÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀqÉUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
10.
vÀÄnÖ¨sÀvÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
¸ÀA¨sÁªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ
«²µÀÖ
CA±ÀªÁV
vÉÆÃj¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ
GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV
EzÀ£ÀÄß
ªÉÃvÀ£À
JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
PR. 118
SC. 50
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,
PÉ.J¸ï. gÁd®Qëöä,
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,
DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.(¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ-2)
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
493
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SECRETARIAT
Subject: Implementation of the judgment dated 09.02.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil
Appeal No. 2368/2011 & connected Civil Appeals–B.K. Pavitra and Others-vs-Union of India and
Others, regarding revision of seniority lists.
Read:
1.
Government Order No. DPAR 29 SBC 1977, dated: 27.4.1978.
2.
O.M. No. DPAR 29 SBC 77, dated 01.06.1978.
3.
The judgment dated: 16.11.1992 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Indra Sawhney Vs Union of India.
4.
Judgment dated: 16.09.1999 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Ajith Singh (II) Vs State of Punjab and others.
5.
Judgment dated: 01.12.2000 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Badappanavar and others Vs State of Karnataka and Others.
6.
The Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants promoted on the basis of reservation (to the posts in the
Civil Services of the State) Act, 2002.
7.
Judgment dated: 19.10.2006 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in M. Nagaraj and Others Vs Union of India and others.
8.
Judgment dated: 9.2.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in B.K. Pavitra Vs Union of India and others.
PREAMBLE:
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 09-02-2017, in the case of B.K. Pavitra & Ors. -vs- Union of India & Ors. – Civil
Appeal No. 2368/2011 & connected Civil Appeals; [‘Pavitra case’ – in short], read at 8 above has set aside Sections 3 and 4 of the
“Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservation (To Posts in the Civil Services
of the State) Act, 2002” [‘2002 Act’ –in short] which provided for consequential seniority to employees belonging to the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes and directed the State Government, among others, to revise the seniority list in the light of this judgment
within three months from the date of judgment and to take further consequential action accordingly within the next three months.
2. In its judgements relating to the State of Karnataka in the case of M.G. Badappanavar, M. Nagaraj and B.K.Pavitra , read at (5),
(7) and (8) above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has, interalia relied upon its judgements in Indra Sawhney and Ajit Singh (II) read at 3
and 4 above.
3. The policy of reservation in promotion in the State Civil Services was introduced by the Order read at (1) above, with effect from
27
th April 1978. For the implementation of this policy, detailed instructions along with a roster of 33 points were also given. The relevant
portion of the order is reproduced below :-
“2. Government are accordingly pleased to direct that there shall be reservations for persons belonging to
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes at 15 percent and 3 percent respectively of vacancies to be filled by
promotion in all the cadres upto and inclusive of the lowest category of Class I posts in which there is no element of
direct recruitment and if there is an element of direct recruitment, such element of direct recruitment does not
exceed 66 2/3 percent.
Paragraph 7 of the said order provided for determination of seniority, based on the length of service in cadre to which promoted. The
same is reproduced below;
“7. Inter-se seniority amongst persons promoted on any occasion shall be determined in accordance with Rule 4 or
4 A (as the case may be) of the Karnataka Government servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957.”
4. Further by the O.M. dated 01-06-1978, read at (2) above, detailed instructions were issued to implement the policy of
reservation in promotion and also to determine the inter-se seniority of employees belonging to reserved categories and general
category along with illustrations.
5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment dated 16.11.1992 in the case of Indra Sawhney read at (3) above, held that Article
16(4) of the Constitution of India provided for reservation in direct recruitment only and reservation in promotion was impermissible. It
was further held that wherever the policy of reservation in promotion was already in vogue, it may be continued for a further period of
five years.
6. Thereafter Clause (4A) in Article 16 was inserted in the Constitution of India by “The Constitution (77
th Amendment) Act, 1995
dated, 17.06.1995, which reads as follows:
“(4A) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for reservation in matters of promotion
to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled
Tribes which, in the opinion of the State, are not adequately represented in the services under the State.”
7. Subsequently, the Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with the issues relating to the seniority of reserved category promotees
in its judgment dated: 16.09.1999 in Ajith Singh (II) read at (4) above, framed the following issues for consideration:
“13. On the above contentions, the following four main points arise for consideration:
(1)
Can the roster-point promotees (reserved category) count their seniority in the promoted category from the
date of their continuous officiation vis-a`-vis general candidates who were senior to them in the lower
category and who were later promoted to the same level?
(2)
Have Virpal, Ajit Singh been correctly decided and has Jagdish Lal been correctly decided?
(3)
Whether the “catch-up” principles contended for by the general candidates are tenable?
(4)
What is the meaning of the “prospective” operation of Sabbarwal and to what extent can Ajit Singh be
prospective?”
8. Dealing with these points at length, the Hon’ble Supreme Court came to the following conclusions; [extracts of relevant paras
are reproduced herein]:
494
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
“ Our conclusions on Points (1) and (2)
77. We, therefore, hold that the roster-point promotees (reserved category) cannot count their seniority in
the promoted category from the date of their continuous officiation in the promoted post, – vis-a`-vis the general
candidates who were senior to them in the lower category and who were later promoted. On the other hand, the
senior general candidate at the lower level, if he reaches the promotional level later but before the further promotion
of the reserved candidate – he will have to be treated as senior, at the promotional level, to the reserved candidate
even if the reserved candidate was earlier promoted to that level. We shall explain this further under Point 3. We also
hold that Virpal and Ajit Singh have been correctly decided and that Jagdish Lal is not correctly decided. Point 1 and
2 are decided accordingly.
Point(3)
78. During the discussion under this “catch up” point – for purposes of convenience, – we take the example
of the cadres in Ajit Singh i.e. there is roster-point promotion for reserved candidates for promotion from Level 1 to
Level 2 and from Level 2 to Level 3. There is no roster for promotion from Level 3 to Level 4.
Two “catch-up” rules contended for by general candidates
79. Now, as stated earlier, the counsel for the general candidates argued for acceptance of two catch-up rules.
Extreme “catch-up” rule
[80. Rejected]
Other “catch-up” rule
81. As accepted in Virpal (SEE 1995(6)SCC 684 at 702) and Ajit Singh (SEE 1996(2) SCC at p.729), we
hold that in case any senior general candidate at Level 2 (Assistant) reaches Level 3 (Superintendent Grade II) before
the reserved candidate (roster –point promotee) at Level 3 goes further up to Level 4 in that case the seniority at Level
3 has to be modified by placing such a general candidate above the roster promotee, reflecting their inter-se seniority
at Level 2. Further promotion to level 4 must be on the basis of such a modified seniority at Level 3, namely, that the
senior general candidate of Level 2 will remain senior also at Level3 to the reserved candidate, even if the latter had
reached Level 3 earlier and remained there when the senior general candidate reached that Level 3. In cases where
the reserved candidate has gone up to Level 4 ignoring the seniority of the senior general candidate at Level 3,
seniority at Level 4 has to be refixed (when the senior general candidate is promoted to Level 4) on the basis of when
the time of reserved candidate for promotion to Level 4 would have come, if the case of the senior general candidates
was considered at Level 3 in due time. To the above extent, we accept the first part of the contention of the learned
counsel for the general candidates. Such a procedure in our view will properly balance the rights of the reserved
candidates and the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 16(1) to the general candidates.”
“85. It is true that the roster-point promotee who has reached the promotional Level 3 even if he is not entitled
to seniority would have gained considerable “experience” at that level. That experience is, no doubt, of considerable
relevance in considering his case for further promotion to Level 4. But, at the same time, it is to be noted that the
general candidates had longer experience at Level 1 and Level 2 and have come up to Level 3 by way of competition
among the general candidates at two stages. The said longer “experience” gained by them at lower Levels 1 and 2 and
the manner in which they have reached the Level 3 to which the reserved candidates had reached earlier, are also
relevant factors. The quality of the experience of these groups also needs to be kept in view. The above principle would
be an equitable balancing of the “experience” of the candidates at various levels. It will be appropriate for the
Government of India or the State Government, as the case may be, to formulate guidelines by way of administrative
orders or by way of rules in this behalf. Point(3) is disposed of accordingly.”
Prospectivity of Sabharwal
“(i) What Sabharwal said in regard to "prospectivity":
87. Before Sabharwal was decided on 10.2.1995, it appears that, in several services, the roster was initially
put in operation and promotions at all the roster points were filled up. But the roster was once again operated on future
vacancies, even though all the required reserved candidates were in position at the promotional level. It was not
realised that once the roster points were all filled, the roster had served its purpose and fresh members of the reserved
classes could claim promotional posts only if any promotional posts already filled by the reserved candidates fell vacant.
This misapplication of the roster came to be removed for the first time on 10.2.95 when Sabharwal was decided.
Obviously, by that time several reserved candidates had got promotion in excess of their quota because of the wrong
"re- operation" of the roster points. If the law declared in Sabbarwal were to be treated as retroactive as is the normal
position whenever the law is declared by this Court, it would have resulted in reversions of several officers of the
reserved classes as their promotions before 10.2.95 by the fresh operation of the roster as aforesaid was wholly
unjustified. This Court in Sabbarwal therefore tried to prevent such reversions and declared (p.753 of SCC para 11) as
follows at the end of the judgment:
"We, however, direct that the interpretation given by us to the working of the roster and our findings on this point shall
be operative prospectively".
Prospectivity of Ajit Singh:
90. Coming to the 'prospectivity' of Ajit Singh, decided on 1.3.96 the question is in regard to the seniority of the reserved
candidates at the promotional level where such promotions have taken place before 1.3.96.
92. Where, before 1.3.96,i.e. the date of Ajit Singh's judgment , at the level 3, there were reserved candidates who
reached there earlier and also senior general candidates who reached there later, (but before the reserved candidate
was promoted to level 4) and when in spite of the fact that the senior general candidate had to be treated as senior at
¨sÁUÀ 1
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
495
level 3 (in view of Ajit Singh), the reserved candidate is further promoted to level 4 - without considering the fact that the
senior general candidate was also available at level 3 - then, after 1.3.96, it becomes necessary to review the promotion
of the reserved candidate to level 4 and reconsider the same (without causing reversion to the reserved candidate who
reached level 4 before 1.3.96). As and when the senior reserved candidate is later promoted to level 4, the seniority at
level 4 has also to be refixed on the basis of when the reserved candidate at level 3 would have got his normal
promotion, treating him as junior to the senior general candidate at level 3. Chander Paul Vs. State of Haryana (1997
(10) SCC 474) has to be understood in the manner stated above.
93. We hold accordingly on Point 4.”
9. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 01.12.2000 in the case of M G Badappanavar read at (5) above, in the light
of its ruling in Judgement dated: 1.3.1996 in the case of Ajit Singh Januja V.State of Punjab (1996) 2 SCC 715 has interpreted Rules 2,
4 and 4A of the “Karnataka Government Servants’ (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and in the matter of determination of seniority of employees
promoted on the basis of reservation in promotion and the general candidates as well as retired Government servants has observed as
follows:-
“20. In fact, some general candidates who have since retired, were indeed entitled to higher promotions, while in service
in first Ajit Singh’s case, supra, is to apply, they would, get substantial benefits which were unjustly denied to them. The
decision in first Ajit Singh’s case, supra, is binding on us. Following the same, we set aside the judgment of the Tribunal
and direct that the seniority lists and promotions be reviewed as per the directions given above, subject of course to the
restriction that those who were promoted before 1-3-96 on principles contrary to first Ajit Singh’s case, supra, need not
be reverted and those who were promoted contrary to Sabharwal case, supra case, supra before 10-2-95 need not be
reverted. This limited protection against reversion was given to those reserved candidates who were promoted contrary to
the law laid down in the above cases, to avoid hardship.
21. We are here adding one more protection to the retired reserved candidates in these cases. Though their seniority is
revised at the level of Executive Engineer or above and though they might not have been promoted if the law laid down by
this Court in first Ajit Singh’s case, supra, and Sabharwal case, supra (as explained in first Ajit Singh’s case, supra) were
applicable to them at the relevant time, still for purposes of their retiral benefits, the said benefits shall be computed on the
basis of the posts factually held by them at the time of retirement and on the emoluments actually drawn by them and not
on the basis of the result of any review that is now directed.
22. So far as the general candidates are concerned, their seniority will be restored in accordance with first Ajit Singh’s case,
supra, and Sabharwal case, supra (as explained in first Ajit Singh’s case, supra) and they will get their promotions
accordingly from the effective dates. They will get notional promotions but will not be entitled to any arrears of salary on the
promotional posts. However, for purposes of retiral benefits, their position in the promoted posts from the notional dates - as
per this judgment - will be taken into account and retiral benefits will be computed as if they were promoted to the posts and
drawn the salary and emoluments of those posts, from the notional dates.”
10. Subsequent to these rulings, the Constitution of India was further amended by the Constitution (85
th Amendment) Act, 2001 by
which in Clause (4A) of Article 16, for the words “in matter of promotion to any class” the words “in matters of promotion, with
consequential seniority to any class” was substituted. This amendment was brought into force with retrospective effect from 17
th day
of June 1995.
11. Based on the Constitution (85
th Amendment) Act, 2001, the State Government has enacted the Karnataka Determination of
Seniority of the Government Servants promoted on the basis of reservation (to the posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act, 2002
read at 6 above.
12. In its judgment dated: 19.10.2006, read at (7) above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in M. Nagaraj and Others Vs Union
of India and others has held as follows:-
“ The impugned constitutional amendments by which Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) have been inserted flow from Article
16(4). They do not alter the structure of Article 16(4). They retain the controlling factors or the compelling reasons, namely,
backwardness and inadequacy of representation which enables the States to provide for reservation keeping in mind the
overall efficiency of the State administration under Article 335. These impugned amendments are confined only to SCs and
STs. They do not obliterate any of the constitutional requirements, namely, ceiling-limit of 50% (quantitative limitation), the
concept of creamy layer (qualitative exclusion), the sub-classification between OBC on one hand and SCs and STs on the
other hand as held in Indra Sawhney5 , the concept of post-based Roster with in-built concept of replacement as held in
R.K. Sabharwal8.
We reiterate that the ceiling-limit of 50%, the concept of creamy layer and the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness,
inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency are all constitutional requirements without which the
structure of equality of opportunity in Article 16 would collapse.
However, in this case, as stated, the main issue concerns the "extent of reservation". In this regard the concerned State will
have to show in each case the existence of the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation
and overall administrative efficiency before making provision for reservation. As stated above, the impugned provision is an
enabling provision. The State is not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions. However if they wish to
exercise their discretion and make such provision, the State has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the
class and inadequacy of representation of that class in public employment in addition to compliance of Article 335. It is
made clear that even if the State has compelling reasons, as stated above, the State will have to see that its reservation
provision does not lead to excessiveness so as to breach the ceiling-limit of 50% or obliterate the creamy layer or extend
the reservation indefinitely.
Subject to above, we uphold the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Seventy-Seventh Amendment) Act, 1995, the
Constitution (Eighty-First Amendment) Act, 2000, the Constitution (Eighty-Second Amendment) Act, 2000 and the
Constitution (Eighty-Fifth Amendment) Act, 2001.
496
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, ªÉÄà 11, 2017
¨sÁUÀ 1
We have not examined the validity of individual enactments of appropriate States and that question will be gone into in
individual writ petition by the appropriate bench in accordance with law laid down by us in the present case.”
13. Thereafter, the Hon’ble Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the High Court for deciding the question of validity of the
2002 Act. The Petition was renumbered by the High Court as W.P.No.14672/2010. The Hon’ble High Court by its order dated
23.12.2010 upheld the validity of the 2002 Act.
14. Challenging the said order dated 23-12-2010 of the Hon’ble High Court, B.K.Pavitra and others filed the Civil Appeal No.2368
/2011 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its judgement dated: 09.02.2017 in Pavitra
case read at (8) above has held as follows :-
“In view of the above, we allow these appeals, set aside the impugned judgment and declare the provisions of the
impugned Act to the extent of doing away with the ‘catch up’ rule and providing for consequential seniority under Sections 3
and 4 to persons belonging to SCs and STs on promotion against roster points to be ultra vires Articles 14 and 16 of the
Constitution. The judgment will not affect those who have already retired and will not affect financial benefits already taken.
Consequential promotions granted to serving employees, based on consequential seniority benefit, will be treated as ad
hoc and liable to be reviewed. Seniority list may be now revised in the light of this judgment within three months from
today. Further consequential action may be taken accordingly within next three months”.
15. In the light of the rulings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, read above, guidelines are required to be issued. The
Government has taken all the relevant aspects into consideration and examined the matter in detail. In the foregoing circumstances, the
Government hereby orders as follows.
GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. DPAR 182 SRR 2011, BENGALURU, DATED:06.05.2017
16. The seniority lists of all cadres in which promotions have been made in accordance with the existing policy of reservation in
promotion and the seniority lists of all cadres higher than such cadres shall be reviewed and action taken as under in respect of every
cadre:
(1)
The review shall be undertaken with effect from 27-04-1978 and all the promotions made and seniority lists published on or
after 27-04-1978 to all the cadres shall be subject to such review.
(2)
As a result of the policy of reservation contained in the Government Order dated 27.4.1978, O.M dated: 01.06.1978 and
2002 Act, read at (1), (2) and (6) above, a junior reserved category employee [JRCE – in short ] would have got promotion
earlier to a senior general category employee [SGCE – in short]. As and when the SGCE (in the feeder cadre) gets his
promotion, his seniority in the cadre to which he is promoted shall be restored and he shall be placed above the JRCE
though the JRCE got his promotion earlier as consequential promotions granted to serving employees, based on
consequential seniority benefit have to be treated as adhoc as directed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In such a case, the
date of eligibility to be assigned to a SGCE shall be the date of promotion of the JRCE in accordance with Section 4 read
with Section 6 and 9 of the Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Promotion, pay and Pension) Act, 1973.
(3)
On such restoration of seniority, the SGCE shall be deemed to have been promoted with effect from the date his Junior
(JRCE) got his promotion earlier and the seniority of the SGCE shall count notionally from that deemed date of promotion.
(4)
Such exercise shall be carried out in respect of every cadre. If by the time the SGCE reaches the higher cadre, the JRCE
has already got his promotion to the next higher cadre, the seniority of JRCE in that cadre shall not be altered. However, the
exercise, as explained above, shall be repeated when the SGCE is also promoted to the next higher cadre.
(5)
Consequent on review of seniority, while assigning the deemed date of promotion the eligibility and suitability for promotion
as on that date of shall be assessed as in the case of normal promotion.
(6)
In the case of serving employees, consequent upon review, if any JRCE does not get deemed date of eligibility in the cadre
under review, he shall not be reverted if he has been promoted on the basis of consequential seniority prior to 01-03-1996.
Only his position in the seniority list may be refixed. The benefit of consequential seniority which he might have derived after
01-03-1996 shall be subject to review. The post, to which JRCE has to be finally fitted against will be determined after
revision of seniority lists of all cadres up to and inclusive of his current cadre is completed.
(7)
In the case of SGCEs, if they have retired and consequent on review if they get a date of eligibility earlier to the actual date
of promotion they shall be deemed to have been promoted from such date.
(8)
A JRCE may be considered for promotion to the next higher cadre to which reservation in promotion applies if he has the
required qualifying service based on the deemed date of eligibility assigned to him and if he is otherwise eligible.
(9)
When promotions are to be made to a cadre from two or more lower (feeder) cadres, the deemed dates of eligibility to be
assigned shall be determined on the basis of the quota prescribed in the rules of recruitment.
(10)
Promotions made against backlog in favour of the employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
in accordance with instructions contained in Government Order No. DPAR 10 SBC 97, dated: 24.6.1997 and instructions
issued from time to time in this regard shall also be subject to review of seniority lists and assignment of dates of eligibility as
above.
(11)
While reviewing the seniority lists as above, the question of determining the dates of eligibility in respect of direct recruits
does not arise since their seniority is determined in accordance with Rule 5 of the Karnataka Government Servants’
(Seniority) Rules, 1957, keeping in view the instructions contained in the O.M. No. DPAR 48 SSR 75, dated: 5.7.1976.
By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,
Gayathri.M.R
PR-140
Under Secretary to Government,
SC-1000
Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms
(Service Rules-1)
ªÀÄÄzÀæPÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀæPÁ±ÀPÀgÀÄ:- ¸ÀAPÀ®£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-59.
R.N.I. No. KARBIL/2001/47147 POSTAL REGN. No. RNP/KA/BGS/2202/2017-19
Licensed to post without prepayment WPP No. 297