(671)

¨sÁUÀ 1

gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀÄvÉÆÛÃ¯É ªÀÄÄAvÁzÀ

J¯Áè E¯ÁSÉUÀ½UÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ DzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ :

2018-19£Éà ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ¸Á°¤AzÀ r¥ÉÆèêÀiÁ E£ï ¥sÁªÀÄð¹ PÉÆÃ¸ïð£À ¥ÀæªÉñÀPÁÌV PÀ£ÁðlPÀ

¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ¢AzÀ DAiÉÄÌ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ £ÀqɸÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :

C¥ÀgÀ OµÀzsÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæPÀgÀÄ, gÁdå OµÀzsÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt E¯ÁSÉ EªÀgÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ¸ÀASÉå : O¤E/45/

AiÉÆÃd£É/2017-18, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 29.06.18.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É :

ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀİè, C¥ÀgÀ OµÀzsÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæPÀgÀÄ, gÁdå OµÀzsÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt E¯ÁSÉ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ, r¥ÉÆèêÀiÁ E£ï

¥sÁªÀÄð¹ ªÀÈwÛ¥ÀgÀ ²PÀët ºÉÆAzÀ®Ä §AiÀĸÀĪÀ gÁdåzÀ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÉ ²PÀëtzÀ UÀÄtªÀÄlÖªÀ£ÀÄß PÁAiÀÄÄÝPÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¹ÃlÄ ºÀAaPÉAiÀİè

¥ÁgÀzÀ±ÀðPÀvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀgÀĪÀ ¸À®ÄªÁV SÁ¸ÀV ²PÀët ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁ ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À®Ä wêÀiÁð¤¹zÉ. ¨sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ

¥sÁªÀÄð¹ ¥ÀjµÀwÛ£À JdÄPÉõÀ£ï gÉUÀÄå¯ÉõÀ£ï 1991gÀ ZÁ¥ÀÖgï-2 gÀ°è r¥ÉÆèêÀiÁ E£ï ¥sÁªÀÄð¹ ²PÀët ºÉÆAzÀ®Ä PÀ¤µÀ× «zÁåºÀðvÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ, ¸ÀPÁðj OµÀzsÀ «eÁÕ£À ªÀĺÁ«zÁå®AiÀÄzÀ 60 ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DAiÉÄÌ ¸À«Äw

¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ, ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ gÁdåzÀ°è 10+2 £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ ªÀÈwÛ¥ÀgÀ ²PÀët ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¹.E.n. ªÀÄÆ®PÀ

¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛzÉ. gÁdåzÀ°è 143 SÁ¸ÀV ²PÀët ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À°è ¥ÀgÀ¸ÀàgÀ M¥ÀàAzÀzÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¥Àæ¸ÀPÀÛ ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ¸Á°£À°è CAzÁdÄ 1000 r.¥sÁªÀÄð¹

¹ÃlÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ®¨sÀåªÁUÀÄvÀÛªÉ. r.¥sÁªÀÄð¹ ²PÀëtªÀ£ÀÄß eÁjUÉÆ½¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ OµÀzsÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀİè

ªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ ¸ÀA¥À£ÀÆä® ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄÆ® ¸ËPÀAiÀÄðzÀ PÉÆgÀvɬÄgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¥Àæ¸ÀPÀÛ ¸Á°¤AzÀ r¥ÉÆèêÀiÁ E£ï ¥sÁªÀÄð¹ ¹ÃlÄ ºÀAaPÉ

¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

C¥ÀgÀ OµÀzsÀ ¤AiÀÄAvÀæPÀgÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ, 2018-19 £Éà ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ

¸Á°¤AzÀ gÁdåzÀ°è£À SÁ¸ÀV ¥sÁªÀÄð¹ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°èAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁ ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, F ¹ÃlÄUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀjÃPÁë

¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ°è «zÁåyðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä / ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ £ÀqɸÀ®Ä ªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ ¸ÀA¥À£ÀÆä® ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CUÀvÀå ªÀÄÆ®¸ËPÀAiÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

E®è¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, 10+2 ²PÀëtzÀ C£ÀAvÀgÀzÀ EvÀgÀ ªÀÈwÛ¥ÀgÀ PÉÆÃ¸ïðUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ

£ÀqɸÀÄwÛgÀĪÀAvÉAiÉÄà r.¥sÁªÀÄð¹ PÉÆÃ¹ðUÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ 2018-19 £Éà ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ¸Á°¤AzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁAvÀgÀ DAiÉÄÌ

¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ £ÀqɸÀ®Ä ¤zsÀðj¹zÉ. DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ DzÉñÀ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DPÀÄPÀ 119 ¦nr 2018 (¨sÁUÀ-1), ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 03.07.2018

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè, 2018-19£Éà ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ ¸Á°¤AzÀ r¥ÉÆèêÀiÁ E£ï ¥sÁªÀÄð¹ PÉÆÃ¸ïð£À ¸ÀPÁðj

PÉÆÃmÁ ¹ÃlÄUÀ½UÉ ¨sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ ¥sÁªÀÄð¹ ¥ÀjµÀwÛ£À JdÄPÉõÀ£ï gÉUÀÄå¯ÉõÀ£ï 1991gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ «zÁåyðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DAiÉÄÌ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀ»¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

PR - 367

SC-25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

©. PÀªÀÄ®ªÀÄä

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ

(¨sÁgÀwÃAiÀÄ ªÉÊzÀå ¥ÀzÀÞw)

¸ÀA¥ÀÄl 153

Volume 153

¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 (±ÁæªÀt 18, ±ÀPÀ ªÀµÀð 1940)

Bengaluru, Thursday, August 9, 2018 (Shravana 18, Shaka Varsha 1940)

¸ÀAaPÉ 32

Issue 32

672

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

¨sÁUÀ 1

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : gÁdåzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ / zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÁßvÀPÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À

±ÀÄ®Ì ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët ¤zÉÃð±À£Á®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ ¢: 25-05-2018 gÀ ¥ÀvÀæ

¸ÀASÉå : rJAE/JA¹J¸ï/10/2018-19.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët ¤zÉÃð±À£Á®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀÄ 2017-18 £Éà ¸Á°£ÀªÀgÉUÉ

JA©©J¸ï/©rJ¸ï ±ÀÄ®ÌUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀæªÀĪÁV gÀÆ. 16,700/- & 14,000/- UÀ¼ÁVzÀÄÝ, §ºÀ¼À ªÀµÀðUÀ½AzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À

±ÀĮ̪ÀÅ ¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀªÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. gÁdåzÀ°è J¯Áè ¸ÀPÁðj PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÁéAiÀÄvÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼ÁVzÀÄÝ, F ¸ÁéAiÀÄvÀÛ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À RZÀÄðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DAiÀiÁ

¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼Éà ªÀ»¹PÉÆ¼Àî¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. FVgÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁðj PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À RZÀÄð ªÉZÀÑUÀ¼À ¤ªÀðºÀuÉAiÀÄÆ §ºÀ¼À zÀĸÀÛgÀªÁVzÀÄÝ,

¸ÀPÁðj PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À ¹Ãn£À ±ÀÄ®ÌUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀªÁzÀ°è ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÀ¼À ºÀtPÁ¹£À ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀÄÆ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉUÉÆ¼ÀÄîvÀÛzÉ.

2017-18 £Éà ¸Á°£À°è SÁ¸ÀV ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁ ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪ÀÅ gÀÆ. 77,000/- UÀ¼ÁVzÀÄÝ, ¸ÀPÁðj

ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪ÀÅ gÀÆ. 16,700/- UÀ¼ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ ºÁUÀÆ zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ SÁ¸ÀV PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁ

¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪ÀÅ gÀÆ. 49,500/- UÀ¼ÁVzÀÄÝ, zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðj PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪ÀÅ gÀÆ. 14,400/- UÀ¼ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F

JgÀqÀÆ ±ÀÄ®ÌUÀ¼À ªÀÄzsÉå ºÉZÀÄÑ CAvÀgÀ«gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ 2018-19 £Éà ¸Á°UÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ªÉÊzÀåQAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃf£À JA©©J¸ï ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß

gÀÆ. 50,000/- UÀ½UÉ & ¸ÀPÁðj zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃf£À ©rJ¸ï ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß gÀÆ. 40.000/- UÀ½UÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ DzÉñÀ

ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

DzÀÝjAzÀ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ eÁjUÉ

§gÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃf£À JA©©J¸ï ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß gÀÆ. 50,000/- UÀ½UÉ & ¸ÀPÁðj zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃf£À

©rJ¸ï ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß gÀÆ.40,000/- UÀ½UÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ wêÀiÁð¤¹, F PɼÀV£ÀAvÉ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DPÀÄPÀ 168 DgïfAiÀÄÄ 2018, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢:26-06-2018

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè, 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ

ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À JA©©J¸ï & ©rJ¸ï ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß F PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀASÉå

¸ÁßvÀPÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀ

»A¢£À ±ÀÄ®Ì

¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

1.

JA©©J¸ï

gÀÆ. 16,700/-

gÀÆ. 50,000/-

2.

©rJ¸ï

gÀÆ. 14,400/-

gÀÆ. 40,000/-

PR - 336

SC - 25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

PÉ. ªÀÄÄgÀ½

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð–2,

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ.

(ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët)

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°UÉ gÁdåzÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À

¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ±ÀÄ®Ì ¥ÀjµÀÌgÀuÉ §UÉÎ.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

2018-19£Éà ¸Á°£À ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄ ºÀAaPÉ & ±ÀÄ®Ì ¤UÀ¢UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ

¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ gÁdåzÀ SÁ¸ÀV PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼ÁzÀ KPCF, KRLMPCA & AMPCK UÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ FUÁUÀ¯Éà ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼Àî¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀgÀ¸ÀàgÀ

MqÀA§rPÉUÀ¼À°è 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°£À ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ½UÉ 2017-18 £Éà ¸Á°UÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁzÀ

±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß F PɼÀV£ÀAvÉ ¥ÀjµÀÌj¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

673

gÁdåzÀ°è£À SÁ¸ÀV ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À (KPCF, KRLMPCA & AMPCK) ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ

rVæ/r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ rVæ/r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄUÀ½UÉ ¥ÁªÀw¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ «ªÀgÀ:

(gÀÆ. UÀ¼À°è)

¸ÀASÉå

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀ

SÁ¸ÀV PÉÆÃmÁzÀr

DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ C¨sÀåyðUÀ½UÉ

¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁzÀr

DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ C¨sÀåyðUÀ½U

¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ

±ÀÄ®Ì

¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ

±ÀÄ®Ì

¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

1. ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀzÀ«.

(C)

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

6,60,000

7,59,000

4,40,000

5,06,000

(D)

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

1,65,000

1,89,750

1,10,000

1,26,500

(E)

¦æQè¤PÀ¯ï

83,000

95,450

55,000

63,250

2. ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ :

(C)

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

5,00,000

5,75,000

3,30,000

3,79,500

(D)

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

1,65,000

1,89,750

1,10,000

1,26,500

3. zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ :

(C)

¥ÀzÀ« ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ

3,52,000

4,04,800

2,25,000

2,58,750

G½zÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÁéAiÀÄvÀÛ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ/zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ½UÉ 2018-19 £Éà ¸Á°UÉ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÉ 2017-18£Éà ¸Á°£À°è PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀÝ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ

§zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ¢gÀ®Ä wêÀiÁð¤¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

(gÀÆ. UÀ¼À°è)

PÀæ.

¸ÀA.

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ¥ÀzÀ« ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

20,000

2.

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

10,000

3.

¦æQè¤PÀ¯ï

5,000

¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

20,000

2.

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

10,000

¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ¥ÀzÀ« zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

20,000

2.

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

5,000

«µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, gÁdåzÀ°è£À ¸ÀPÁðj ºÁUÀÆ SÁ¸ÀV ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ

& zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°UÉ ªÉÄð£ÀAvÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ

wêÀiÁð¤¹. F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DPÀÄPÀ 113 DgïfAiÀÄÄ 2018, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 23.04.2018.

gÁdåzÀ°è£À SÁ¸ÀV ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ / zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ±ÀĮ̪À£ÀÄß 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°UÉ F

PɼÀV£ÀAvÉ ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹ DzÉò¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

674

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

¨sÁUÀ 1

gÁdåzÀ°è£À SÁ¸ÀV ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è£À (KPCF, KRLMPCA & AMPCK) ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ

rVæ/r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ rVæ/ r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄUÀ½UÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁzÀ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ «ªÀgÀ :

(gÀÆ. UÀ¼À°è)

PÀæ.

¸ÀA.

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀ

SÁ¸ÀV PÉÆÃmÁzÀr

DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ C¨sÀåyðUÀ½UÉ

¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁzÀr

DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ C¨sÀåyðUÀ½UÉ

¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ

±ÀÄ®Ì

¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ

±ÀÄ®Ì

¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

1. ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀzÀ«.

(C)

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

6,60,000

7,59,000

4,40,000

5,06,000

(D)

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

1,65,000

1,89,750

1,10,000

1,26,500

(E)

¦æQè¤PÀ¯ï

83,000

95,450

55,000

63,250

2. ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ :

(C)

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

5,00,000

5,75,000

3,30,000

3,79,500

(D)

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

1,65,000

1,89,750

1,10,000

1,26,500

3. zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ :

(C)

¥ÀzÀ« ªÀÄvÀÄÛ

r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ

3,52,000

4,04,800

2,25,000

2,58,750

G½zÀAvÉ ¸ÀPÁðj ¸ÁéAiÀÄvÀÛ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ / zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁ¯ÉÃdÄUÀ¼À°è ¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ & zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ½UÉ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ «zÁåyðUÀ¼ÀÄ ¥ÁªÀw¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ªÀåvÁå¸À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÁzÀÝjAzÀ 2017-18 £Éà ¸Á°£À°è

PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ ±ÀĮ̪À£Éßà 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°£À°è ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ «zÁåyðUÀ½UÀÆ ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

(gÀÆ. UÀ¼À°è)

¸ÀASÉå

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀ

¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì

¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ¥ÀzÀ« ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

20,000

2.

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

10,000

3.

¦æQè¤PÀ¯ï

5,000

¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

20,000

2.

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

10,000

¸ÁßvÀPÉÆÃvÀÛgÀ ¥ÀzÀ« zÀAvÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼ÀÄ

1.

Qè¤PÀ¯ï

20,000

2.

¥ÁågÁ Qè¤PÀ¯ï

5,000

PR – 337

SC - 25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

JA.©.zsÉÆÃvÉæ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð – 2,

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ.

(ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët)

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : gÁfêïUÁA¢ü DgÉÆÃUÀå «eÁÕ£ÀUÀ¼À «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀĪÀÅ £ÀqɸÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼À dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : PÀÄ®¸ÀaªÀgÀÄ, gÁfêïUÁA¢ü DgÉÆÃUÀå «eÁÕ£ÀUÀ¼À «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ EªÀgÀ ¢: 07-12-2017 &

01-02-2018 gÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå DgïfAiÀÄĺÉZïJ¸ï/¦fEn/AiÀÄÄf/05/2017-18.

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

675

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¥ÀvÀæUÀ¼À°è gÁfêïUÁA¢ü DgÉÆÃUÀå «eÁÕ£ÀUÀ¼À «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀĪÀÅ 2002 jAzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀgÀªÁV F PɼÀPÀAqÀ

PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ºÀAaPÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉë & Pˤì°AUï £ÀqɸÀÄvÁÛ §A¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

Courses

Method of Selection

B.Sc. Nursing

Merit list based on PUC Marks

Bachelor of Physiotherapy

Merit list based on PUC Marks

BPO

Merit list based on PUC Marks

Master of Physiotherapy

Merit list based on the marks

secured in entrance

examination.

Master of Pharmacy

Merit list based on the marks

secured in entrance examination

Pharm-D (Post Baccalaureate)

Merit list based on the marks

secured in entrance examination

M.Sc. Nursing

Merit list based on the marks

secured in entrance examination

ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ, F PɼÀPÀAqÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ½UÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¥ÀæªÉñÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉë/ Pˤì°AUï £ÀqɸÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

Courses

Method of Selection

B.Sc. Allied Health Sciences

Merit list based on PUC marks

PB B.Sc (Nursing)

Merit based on GNM marks

M.Sc (AHS)

Based on Marks in Entrance Test

«±Àé«zÁå®AiÀĪÀÅ 2018-19 £Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ ªÀÄÄA§gÀĪÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ Pˤì°AUï C£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀĪÀ ¥Àj¹ÜwAiÀİè

EgÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÁzÀÝjAzÀ ¸ÀzÀj dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀ»¸ÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

DzÀÝjAzÀ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ PÀÆ®APÀµÀªÁV ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ, gÁfêïUÁA¢ü DgÉÆÃUÀå «eÁÕ£ÀUÀ¼À

«±Àé«zÁå®AiÀĪÀÅ ªÉÄð£À PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁzÀ ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÁwUÁV ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ £ÀqɸÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ Pˤì°AUï C£ÀÄß

£ÀqɸÀĪÀ dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß 2018-19£Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀ»¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ wêÀiÁð¤¹, F PɼÀV£ÀAvÉ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß

ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DPÀÄPÀ 14 DgïfAiÀÄÄ 2018, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢: 26-03-2018

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè, gÁfêïUÁA¢ü DgÉÆÃUÀå «eÁÕ£ÀUÀ¼À «±Àé«zÁå®AiÀĪÀÅ F PɼÀPÀAqÀ PÉÆÃ¸ÀÄðUÀ¼À

¸ÀPÁðj PÉÆÃmÁzÀ ¹ÃlÄUÀ¼À ¥ÀæªÉñÁwUÁV ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ £ÀqɸÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ Pˤì°AUï C£ÀÄß £ÀqɸÀĪÀ dªÁ¨ÁÝjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß 2018-19£ÉÃ

¸Á°¤AzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ªÀ»¹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

Courses

Method of Selection

B.Sc. Nursing

Merit list based on PUC Marks

Bachelor of Physiotherapy

Merit list based on PUC Marks

BPO

Merit list based on PUC Marks

Master Of Physiotherapy

Merit list based on the marks

secured in entrance examination.

M.Sc. Nursing

Merit list based on the marks

secured in entrance examination

B.Sc. Allied Health Sciences

Merit list based on PUC Marks

PB B.Sc (Nursing)

Merit based on GNM Marks

M.Sc (AHS)

Based on Marks in Entrance Test

PR – 338

SC - 25

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

JA.©.zsÉÆÃvÉæ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð – 2,

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ.

(ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët)

676

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

¨sÁUÀ 1

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ :

£ÉºÀgÀÄ ¸ÁägÀPÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ (j) ªÀļÀªÀ½î, F ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÉëĸÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : ¸ÀE 49 ¸À¸ÀA£ÉÆÃ 2018 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¢£ÁAPÀ : 02/07/2018

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ : 1) ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå : C¤(¨Á&ªÀiÁ) ¸ÀA.¸ÀA/2/11/2017-18, ¢:12-03-2018.

2) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ £ÉÆÃnÃ¸ï ¸ÀASÉå: ¸ÀE 49 ¸À¸ÀA£ÉÆÃ 2018, ¢:27-04-2018

3) CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ/PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð £ÉºÀgÀÄ ¸ÁägÀPÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ (j) ªÀļÀªÀ½î, EªÀgÀ °TvÀ GvÀÛgÀ

¢:22-05-2018.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå : (1) gÀ NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è £ÉºÀgÀÄ ¸ÁägÀPÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ (j) ªÀļÀªÀ½î, F

¸ÀAWÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÝzÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ f¯Áè £ÉÆÃAzÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, ªÀÄAqÀå EªÀgÀÄ

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆÃAzÀt C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ 1960 PÀ®A 25 gÀr «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ DzÉò¹zÀÄÝ, CzÀgÀAvÉ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀİè

¸ÀAWÀzÀ CzsÀåPÀëgÉ£À߯ÁzÀ ²æÃ ºÉZï.JA.«ÃgÀAiÀÄå gÀªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀÝgÉ£À߯ÁzÀ gÁf£ÁªÉÄAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÁPÁëöåzsÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀİè

®¨sÀåªÁUÀ¢zÀÄÝ, 2001£Éà ¸Á°£À ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ £ÀqɹgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ zÁR¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀAWÀªÀÅ ¤ÃqÀzÉà EzÀÄÝ KPÁKQ

²æÃ ºÉZï.JA. «ÃgÀAiÀÄå gÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÁgÀt«®èzÉ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ ¸ÀzÀ¸Àå ¸ÁÜ£À¢AzÀ ©nÖgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ C£ÀĪÀiÁ£ÀUÀ½UÉ JqÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ

²æÃ ºÉZï.JA.«ÃgÀAiÀÄå EªÀgÀ gÁfãÁªÉÄ £ÉÊdªÁzÀÄzÀ®èªÉAzÀÄ «ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀnÖzÀÄÝ, «ZÁgÀuÁ ªÀgÀ¢ ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀæªÀÄ«qÀ®Ä

w½¹zÀ ¥ÀvÀæPÉÌ GvÀÛgÀªÁV ¸ÀAWÀzÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀgÀÄ E¯ÁSÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjgÀĪÀÅzÁV ªÀgÀ¢ ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ, F

»£É߯ÉAiÀİè PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆÃAzÀt PÁAiÉÄÝ 1960gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 27(J) gÀ£ÀéAiÀÄ 6 wAUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üUÉ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ C¢üPÁj, ªÀļÀªÀ½î

vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉëĸÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃj ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÉ ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

DzÀÝjAzÀ £ÉºÀgÀÄ ¸ÁägÀPÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ (j) ªÀļÀªÀ½î, F ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß KPÉ £ÉëĸÀ¨ÁgÀzÉA§ §UÉÎ, 15

¢£ÀUÀ¼ÉƼÀUÉ °TvÀ ºÉýPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀĪÀAvÉ, E®èªÁzÀ°è ¤AiÀĪÀiÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÁV ªÉÄÃ¯É PÀæ.¸ÀA.(2)gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ

£ÉÆÃn¸À£ÀÄß ¸ÀAWÀzÀ CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ/PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð EªÀjUÉ eÁjUÉÆ½¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.

ªÉÄÃ¯É (3) gÀ°è NzÀ¯ÁzÀ °TvÀ ¸ÀªÀÄeÁ¬Ä¶AiÀİè, ²æÃ ºÉZï.JA.«ÃgÀAiÀÄå EªÀgÀÄ ¢:15-12-2000gÀAzÀÄ ¸ÀA¸ÉÜUÉ gÁfãÁªÉÄ

¤ÃrgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀvÀåªÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉAzÀÄ. ¸ÀzÀj gÁfãÁªÉÄ CAVÃPÁgÀUÉÆAqÀ 16 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À vÀgÀĪÁAiÀÄ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ ªÀÄ£À«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt¸À®Ä

¸ÁzsÀå«®èªÉAzÀÄ F »AzÉ ºÉZï.JA. «ÃgÀAiÀÄå£ÀªÀgÀÄ CzsÀåPÀëgÁVzÀÝ PÁ®zÀ°è £ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ J¯Áè vÀ¥ÀÄàUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ EgÀĪÀ CzsÀåPÀëgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÁQ

«ZÁgÀuÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀgÀ¢ ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉAzÀÄ F §UÉÎ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ªÀÄgÀÄ vÀ¤SÉ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁV, ²æÃ ºÉZï.JA.«ÃgÀAiÀÄå EªÀgÀ gÁfãÁªÉÄ £ÉÊdªÀ®èªÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ

2001£Éà ¸Á°£À DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ £ÀqɹgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÁQë/zÁR¯É ¤Ãr®èªÁzÀÝjAzÀ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄÄ

C¤²ÑvÀvɬÄAzÀ PÀÆrgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ F UÉÆAzÀ®UÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀ¦à¸À®Ä £ÉºÀgÀÄ ¸ÁägÀPÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ (j) ªÀļÀªÀ½î, F ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß

£ÉëĸÀ®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ wêÀiÁð¤¹zÉ. DzÀÝjAzÀ F DzÉñÀ.

-: DzÉñÀ :-

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À £ÉÆÃAzÀt PÁAiÉÄÝ, 1960gÀ PÀ®A 27(J) gÀ°è ¥ÀæzÀvÀÛªÁzÀ

C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¹, £ÉºÀgÀÄ ¸ÁägÀPÀ «zÁå ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ (j), »lÖ£ÀºÀ½î PÉÆ¥Àà®Ä, ªÀļÀªÀ½î, ªÀÄAqÀå f¯Éè, F ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ

¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀĪÀAvÉ ªÀÄÄA¢£À 6 wAUÀ¼À CªÀ¢üUÉ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÁAqÀªÀ¥ÀÄgÀ G¥À «¨sÁUÀ,

¥ÁAqÀªÀ¥ÀÄgÀ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÁßV £ÉëĹ DzÉò¹zÉ.

DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀA¸ÉÜAiÀİè£À CªÀåªÀºÁgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸Àj¥Àr¹, ¸ÀAWÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½UÉ ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉ £Àqɹ,

ZÀÄ£Á¬ÄvÀ £ÀÆvÀ£À DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ½UÉ C¢üPÁgÀ ºÀ¸ÁÛAvÀj¸ÀĪÀAvÉ ¸ÀÆa¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

PR – 340

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

Dgï.¸ÉAvÁªÀÄgÉÊ

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð – 3

¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ E¯ÁSÉ.

DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ : dÆ£ï 2018 ¢éwÃAiÀÄ ¦.AiÀÄÄ.¹ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼À ¥Àæ±ÉߥÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÉ ¥ÀjÃPÁë UË¥Àå

¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢üvÀ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄPÉÌ «vÀj¸À®Ä ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ReÁ£É

E¯ÁSÉUÉ C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ :

1) ¸ÀPÁðj DzɱÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DE 194 DRE 2015, ¢:22.10.2016

2) ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀA: DE 194 DRE 2015, ¢:27.02.2018

3) ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ReÁ£É E¯ÁSÉ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ CªÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå:R¤/¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ/01/2016-17,

¢ : 25.06.2018

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

677

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (1)gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ReÁ£É ¸ÀA»vÉ 18 (J) gÀrAiÀÄ C¥ÀªÁzÀzÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉAiÀiÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ

ReÁ£ÉUÀ½AzÀ MAzÀÄ UÀAmÉ ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁV ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉ ºÁUÀÆ N.JA.Dgï ²Ãmïì «vÀj¸ÀĪÀ ¤AiÀĪÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸Àr°¹ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À

CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÁUÀÆ °TvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ£ÀĸÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¤UÀ¢vÀ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ UÀAmÉUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAZÉ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ

EvÀgÉ UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «vÀj¸À®Ä ReÁ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀĪÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (2) gÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è 2018£Éà ¸Á°£À ¢éwÃAiÀÄ ¦.AiÀÄÄ.¹ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼À ¥Àæ±ÉߥÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÉ ¥ÀjÃPÁë UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß

¸ÀA§A¢üvÀ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄPÉÌ «vÀj¸À®Ä gÁdåzÀ ReÁ£ÉUÀ¼À C©ügÀPÉëAiÀİè EqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ

¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ EvÀgÉ UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀiÁVæUÀ¼ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃPÉë ¥ÁægÀA¨sÀªÁUÀĪÀ ªÀÄÆgÀÄ UÀAmÉ ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁV ReÁ£É¬ÄAzÀ «vÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§

¤AiÀĪÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸Àr°¹ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÁUÀÆ °TvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ£ÀĸÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ £Á®ÄÌ UÀAmÉ ªÀÄÄAZÉ

¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ EvÀgÉ UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀiÁVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «vÀj¸À®Ä ReÁ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀĪÀ C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß

ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.

2018£Éà ¸Á°£À dÆ£ï ¢éwÃAiÀÄ ¦AiÀÄĹ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼ÀÄ ¨É½UÉÎ 10.15PÉÌ DgÀA¨sÀªÁUÀÄwÛgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¨É½îUÉ 6.00UÀAmÉUÉ

ReÁ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉgÉzÀÄ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «vÀj¸À®Ä ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¥ÀzÀ« ¥ÀƪÀð ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉ gÀªÀgÀÄ PÉÆÃjgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ,

ReÁ£É E¯ÁSÉgÀªÀgÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ (3) gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¥ÀjÃPÉë ¥ÁægÀA¨sÀªÁUÀĪÀ £Á®ÄÌ UÀAmÉ ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁV ReÁ£É¬ÄAzÀ «vÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§

¤AiÀĪÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸Àr°¹ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÁUÀÆ °TvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ£ÀĸÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ £Á®ÄÌ UÀAmÉ ºÀ¢£ÉÊzÀÄ

¤«ÄµÀ ªÀÄÄAZÉ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢üvÀ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄPÉÌ «vÀj¸À®Ä ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÀAzÀÄ ¨É½UÉÎ 6.00

UÀAmÉUÉ ReÁ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉgÉzÀÄ f¯Áè PÉÃAzÀæ¢AzÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë PÉÃAzÀæUÀ½VgÀĪÀ zÀÆgÀ ºÁUÀÆ PÀæ«Ä¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ UÀÄtªÀÄlÖªÀ£ÁßzsÀj¹

f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄPÉÌ ¥ÀjÃPÁë UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «vÀj¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¤ÃqÀĪÀAvÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀjÃPÁë

¢£ÀzÀAzÀÄ ¨É¼ÀV£À ¥ÀjÃPÉëAiÀÄ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ªÀÄzsÁåºÀßzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MnÖUÉ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀðzÀ±Àð£À ¤ÃqÀĪÀAvÉ

PÉÆÃjzÁÝgÉ.

ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ªÀÄÄA¢£ÀAvÉ DzÉò¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå : DE 43 DRE 2018 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ : 29.06.2018

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀİè, dÆ£ï 2018£Éà ¸Á°£À ¢éwÃAiÀÄ ¦.AiÀÄÄ.¹ ¥ÀjÃPÉëUÀ¼À ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÉ

¥ÀjÃPÁë UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§A¢üvÀ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄPÉÌ «vÀj¸À®Ä gÁdåzÀ ReÁ£ÉUÀ¼À C©ügÀPÉëAiÀİè EqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀ

¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ EvÀgÉ UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼ÀÄ EvÁå¢UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃPÉë ¥ÁægÀA¨sÀªÁUÀĪÀ £Á®ÄÌ UÀAmÉ ªÀÄÄAavÀªÁV

ReÁ£É¬ÄAzÀ «vÀj¸À¨ÉÃPÉA§ ¤AiÀĪÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¸Àr°¹ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÁUÀÆ °TvÀ PÉÆÃjPÉAiÀÄ£ÀĸÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ

CªÀ¢üVAvÀ £Á®ÄÌ UÀAmÉ ºÀ¢£ÉÊzÀÄ ¤«ÄµÀ ªÀÄÄAZÉ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ EvÀgÉ UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀiÁVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «vÀj¸À®Ä

ReÁ£Á¢üPÁjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀjUÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. ºÁUÉAiÉÄà ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÀAzÀÄ ¨É½îUÉ 6.00

UÀAmÉUÉ ReÁ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉgÉzÀÄ f¯Áè PÉÃAzÀæ¢AzÀ ¥ÀjÃPÁë PÉÃAzÀæUÀ½VgÀĪÀ zÀÆgÀ ºÁUÀÆ PÀæ«Ä¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ gÀ¸ÉÛAiÀÄ UÀÄtªÀÄlÖªÀ£ÁßzsÀj¹

f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄPÉÌ ¥ÀjÃPÁë UË¥Àå ¸ÁªÀÄVæUÀ¼À£ÀÄß «vÀj¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.

ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ ¥ÀjÃPÁë ¢£ÀUÀ¼ÀAzÀÄ ¨É¼ÀV£À ¥ÀjÃPÉëAiÀÄ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ªÀÄzsÁåºÀßzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ¥Àæ±Éß ¥ÀwæPÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß MnÖUÉ

¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃrzÉ.

PR – 341

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

f.±À²zsÀgï

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ (DqÀ½vÀ & ªÀÄÄAUÀqÀ)

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

wzÀÄÝ¥Àr

¸ÀASÉå: DPÀÄPÀ 152 PÉ«JA 2018 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25-06-2018.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DPÀÄPÀ 152 PÉ«JA 2018 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 24.04.2018 gÀ°è gÁdåzÀ°è Cwà «gÀ¼À SÁ¬Ä¯ÉUÀ½UÉ aQvÉì ¤ÃqÀĪÀ

¸À®ÄªÁV gÁdå vÁAwæPÀ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÀa¹ DzÉò¸À¯ÁVzÀÄÝ ¸ÀzÀj DzÉñÀ ¨sÁUÀzÀ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå-03 gÀ°è “dAn ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ¦rAiÀiÁnæPïì

«¨sÁUÀ, DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ” JA§ÄzÀgÀ §zÀ°UÉ “G¥À ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ, ZÉÊ¯ïØ ºÉ¯ïÛ, DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt

E¯ÁSÉ” JAzÀÄ N¢PÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

PR-335

SC-50

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

PÉ. ªÀÄÄgÀ½

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt E¯ÁSÉ.

(ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ²PÀët)

678

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

wzÉÆÝïÉ

¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 37 PÉJ¯ïJA 2013 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 06.07-2018.

¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 37 PÉJ¯ïJA 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ:16.12.2016gÀ ¨ÉÆÃzsÀPÉÃvÀgÀ ¹§âA¢ PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå:05gÀ°è ªÉÃvÀ£À ±ÉæÃtÂ

“11,000-19,000” gÀ §zÀ¯ÁV “10,400-16,400” JAzÀÄ w¢Ý N¢PÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

G½zÀAvÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

PR-352

SC-100

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

PÉ. ¸Á«vÀæªÀÄä

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ. (ªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼ÀÄ)

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

wzÉÆÝïÉ

¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 53 PÉJ¯ïJA 2013(¨sÁUÀ-1) ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 05.05.2017.

¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¯Á 53 PÉJ¯ïJA 2013, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 26.08.2015gÀ DzÉñÀ “¨ÉÆÃzsÀPÉÃvÀgÀ ¹§âA¢” PÀArPÉAiÀÄr PÀæªÀÄ

¸ÀASÉå:09 gÀ°ègÀĪÀ ²æÃ C±ÉÆÃPï PÀĪÀiÁgï J£ï, ¥ÀjZÁgÀPÀgÀÄ, EªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À JzÀÄjVgÀĪÀ “«ÄøÀ¯Áw” PÁ®A£À°è ‘3J’ JA§ÄzÀgÀ

§zÀ¯ÁV ‘¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀUÀð (fJA)’ JAzÀÄ w¢Ý N¢PÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.

G½zÀAvÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà §zÀ¯ÁªÀuÉ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.

PR-353

SC-100

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

PÉ. ¸Á«vÀæªÀÄä

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ. (ªÀiÁ£ÀªÀ ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼ÀÄ)

DyðPÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ

«µÀAiÀÄ:

gÁdåzÀ°è£À ReÁ£É E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀÆvÀ£À G¥À ReÁ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸Áܦ¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ.

NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå:R¤/¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ/22/2017-18, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 17-03-2018.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É:

ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀİè, PÀAzÁAiÀÄ E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄÄ 50 ºÉƸÀ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀa¹ CAwªÀÄ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É

ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ReÁ£É E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ £ÀÆvÀ£ÀªÁV gÀa¹gÀĪÀ 23 vÁ®ÆèPÀÄUÀ¼À°è FUÁUÀ¯Éà G¥À ReÁ£ÉUÀ½zÀÄÝ, G½zÀ

27 G¥À ReÁ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀÆvÀ£ÀªÁV ¸Áܦ¸À®Ä ºÉƸÀzÁV 137 ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸ÀĪÀAvÉ PÉÆÃjzÁÝgÉ.

ReÁ£É ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ ¥Àj²Ã°¹, PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ.

¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: DE 85 CRE 2018, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:06£Éà dįÉÊ 2018.

¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀİè, ReÁ£É E¯ÁSÉUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ £ÀÆvÀ£ÀªÁV gÀa¹gÀĪÀ 23 vÁ®ÆèPÀÄUÀ¼À°è

FUÁUÀ¯Éà G¥À ReÁ£ÉUÀ½zÀÄÝ, G½zÀ 27 G¥À ReÁ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÀÆvÀ£ÀªÁV ¸Áܦ¸À®Ä ºÉƸÀzÁV F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

PÀæªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå

ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ

ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉå

1

¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ Rd£Á¢üPÁj

27

2

ªÀÄÄRå ¯ÉQÌUÀ

24

3

¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ zÀeÉð ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀgÀÄ

46

4

¢éwÃAiÀÄ zÀeÉð ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀgÀÄ

13

5

UÀÆæ¥ï-r

27

MlÄÖ

137

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À°è UÀÆæ¥ï-r ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀUÀÄwÛUÉ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁrPÉÆ¼ÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ.

F DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ (¹§âA¢) ±ÁSÉAiÀÄ n¥Ààt ¸ÀASÉå ¹D¸ÀÄE 188 ¹±Á¸Éà 2018

¢£ÁAPÀ: 26-06-2018 gÀ°è ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ ¸ÀºÀªÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀéAiÀÄ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÉ.

PR-357

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DeÁÕ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è,

f. ±À²zsÀgï.

¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð,

(DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÄÄAUÀqÀUÀ¼ÀÄ)

DyðPÀ E¯ÁSÉ.

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

679

INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT

Sub:

Revised Policy on PPP for Infrastructure Projects in Karnataka -2018.

Read:

1.

G.O No.IDD 01 UIP 1997 dated: 26.12.2007.

2.

G.O No.IDD 32 IDM 1997 dated: 16.07.2007.

3.

Corrigendum Order No. IDD 59 ITS 2009 dated: 31.05.2010& 16.08.2010.

4.

Govt. Notification No.IDD 59 ITS 2009 dated : 01.06.2010 & 02.06.2010.

5.

Govt. Order No. IDD 07 ITS 2010 dated: 08.08.2011.

6.

Govt. Notification No.IDD 59 ITS 2009 dated: 19.05.2012.

7.

Govt. Order No.IDD 07 ITS 2013 dated: 30.10.2015.

Preamble:

The State Government brought a separate Infrastructure Policy for Infrastructure Development during 1997, vide G.O read at Sl

no(1) which were revised during 2007 vide G.O read at Sl no (2) and in G.O no.IDD 07 ITS 2013, dated: 30.10.2015.In the current

scenario with the change in guidelines by the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India and considering developmental

trends in the market, the need for formulating a new policy with updations in the institutional framework, structuring mechanism of the

projects and other relevant updations has been felt essential.

2.

Karnataka is embarking upon an infrastructure led development strategy. Clearly recognising the need to develop high

quality infrastructure as a means to achieve rapid economic growth and keeping in view the current economic scenario,

the Government of Karnataka (GoK) has formulated a comprehensive and well-designed “PPP Policy for Infrastructure

Projects-2018”.

I.

The key objectives of the Karnataka “PPP Policy for Infrastructure Projects-2018”include the following:

a. To increase the quality and quantity of infrastructure through the implementation of a multi-year infrastructure agenda.

b. To focus on recognizing and embracing the key role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in enhancing infrastructure

development.

c. To provide a fair and transparent policy framework to facilitate and encourage Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in the

upgrading, expanding and development of infrastructure in the State

d. To put in place successful PPP implementation models.

e.

To facilitate private sector investments in infrastructure by improving domestic investment environment.

II.

The Salient Features of the new Karnataka PPP Policy for Infrastructure Projects-2018 include the following:

a. The sanction limit for the Single Window Agency for PPP projects under the Chairmanship of the Chief Secretary to

Government constituted at the State level to be increased to Rs 500 Cr from existing Rs.50 Cr.

b. Facilitate financing of project development and implementation through Infrastructure Initiative Fund, Indian

Infrastructure Project Development Fund” (IIPDF)” and “National Investment and Infrastructure Fund” (NIIF) along with

its “Karnataka Infrastructure Project Development Fund” (KIPDF) which may be placed under the control and

supervision of KSIIDC.

c. Monitoring and evaluation of the policy would be done at the State level by the State High Level Clearance Committee

under the Chairmanship of Hon’ble Chief Minister.

d. An Empowered Committee will be constituted by the Government, under the Chairmanship of the Additional Chief

Secretary, Infrastructure Development Department to facilitate coordination and planning from various departments and

thereby make recommendations to State High Level Clearance Committee regarding the development of policies,

directives, manuals and guidelines in a timely manner for taking mid-course corrections.

e. Infrastructure Development Department (IDD) will be the nodal agency for all the infrastructure projects across the 14

sectors taken on PPP mode. All PPP projects to be implemented in the State by various Departments, agencies and

State Corporations will be sent to IDD for vetting and advice.

f.

IDD with the assistance of KSIIDC will develop multi-year Action Plans detailing the strategies and implementation plans

for each of the fourteen infrastructure sectors clearly setting out the role for PPP.

g. IDD and KSIIDC would be duly strengthened with staff having appropriate skills to enable it to co-ordinate and integrate

the necessary procedures and processes for facilitating Government/Government Agencies in expeditious project

approval and implementation.

h. KSIIDC, under the administrative control of IDD, shall play a key supportive role by assisting IDD in allits major project

development, implementation and monitoring functions.

i.

KSIIDC will setup a suitably designed information management system to seek information from various project

implementation departments/agencies to compile the aforesaid quarterly reports.

680

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

j.

Infrastructure Development Department(IDD) shall handhold all the PPP projects in the State till award of the project

and also during implementation period. The main role of IDD will be:

i.

to establish a Policy Wing to manage all activities related to policy, technical, legal and such other matters related to

PPP projects. The Policy Wing will be managed by suitably qualified and experienced persons.

ii.

to act as a nodal agency to the Government Departments /Agencies in the development of PPP policies and

programme and make suitable recommendations to the Government for its consideration and adoption;

iii.

to monitor the competitive bidding process and suo-moto proposals and provide for course correction, if required;

iv.

to setup an Appraisal Cell to make recommendations in matters of promotion of infrastructural projects needing

central Government interventions or clearances.

v.

to decide financial support under the Karnataka Viability Gap Fund Scheme and approve allocation of the Fund for

Projects;

k.

Capacity would also be built up in Government Departments/Government agencies at the State and district levels to

formulate and implement infrastructure projects on PPP basis. Services of empanelled consultants/advisors may be

hired by the respective Departments/Government agencies for structuring of PPP projects and submit to IDD for

approval.

l.

The administrative control of KSIIDC, which is at present under Commerce & Industries Department will be transferred

to Infrastructure Development Department for providing the above mentioned services.

m.

Other updations to be made in the Policy as per the current trends in the market and Government of India guidelines on

PPP projects.

3.

The proposal for a Revised Policy on PPP for Infrastructure Projects in Karnataka- 2018 has been examined and

hence this order.

Government Order No. IDD 14 ITS 2018, Bengaluru dated : 17.03.2018

Under the circumstances explained in the preamble the Government of Karnataka are pleased to announce the Revised

Infrastructure Policy as detailed in Annexure – I to this order supported by Schedule-I (Evaluation of Risks and Risk mitigation) and

Schedule – II (Institutional Roles and Responsibilities).

1.

The detailed scope of services of the IDD as nodal agency for PPP projects in the State is stated in Schedule II

(Institutional Roles and Responsibilities) of the Infrastructure Policy, 2018 at Annexure-I

2.

Sanction of the Government is also accorded to transfer the administrative control of Karnataka State Industrial and

Infrastructure Development Corporation from the Commerce and Industries Department to Infrastructure Development

Departmentwith immediate effect.

3.

The Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms will issue necessary directions to KSIIDC as per Karnataka

Government (Allocation of Business) Rules 1977 in this regard.

4.

This order issues with the concurrence of Finance Department in vide note No 1141, dated:17.02.2018 and Commerce

and Industries Department in vide note dated: 17.02.2018 and in accordance with rule 28 of First Schedule to Karnataka

Government (Transaction of Business) Rules 1977.

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

M. Venkatesh Murthy

Under Secretary to Government

Infrastructure Development Department

Annexure-I to the Government Order No. IDD 14 ITS 2018 dated 17.03.2018

PPP Policy for Infrastructure Projects -2018 for the State of Karnataka

ABBREVIATIONS

BLT

Build-Lease-Transfer

BOLT

Build-Own-Lease-Transfer

BOO

Build-Own-Operate

BOOST

Build-Own-Operate-Share-Transfer

BOOT

Build-Own-Operate-Transfer

BOST

Build-Operate-Share-Transfer

BOT

Build-Operate-Transfer

BT

Build & Transfer

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

681

CA

Concession Agreement

EPC

Engineering Procurement Construction

FD

Finance Department, Government of Karnataka

GoI

Government of India

GoK

Government of Karnataka

HLC

High-Level Committee

HAM

Hybrid Annuity Model

IDC

Inter-Departmental Committee

IDD

Infrastructure Development Department, Government of Karnataka

KSIIDC

Karnataka State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation

IIF

Infrastructure Initiative Fund

IT

Information Technology

K-RIDE

Rail Infrastructure Development Co. Karnataka Ltd.

KUIDFC

Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development & Finance Corporation Ltd.

LRTS

Light Rail Transit Systems

MRTS

Mass Rapid Transit Systems

MSW

Municipal Solid Waste

NGO

Non-Governmental Organization

NSDP

Net State Domestic Product

JNNURM

Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission

O&M

Operation & Maintenance

PDF

Project Development Fund

PIF

Project Investment Fund

PPP

Public-Private Partnership

PSP

Private Sector Participant

ROMT

Rehabilitate-Operate-Maintain-Transfer

SPV

Special Purpose Vehicle

SWA/SLSWA

State Level Single Window Agency

VGF

Viability Gap Fund

DEFINITIIONS

Bidder

Any entity which has submitted a proposal to undertake an Infrastructure Project under Public-

Private Partnership

Central Government

Government of India

Central Government Agency

Any department of the Central Government, any statutory authority of the Central Government,

or body corporate, owned or controlled by the Central Government holding greater than 50% of

the paid-up share capital in such entity.

Company

Any entity incorporated under the Companies Act 1956/2013

Developer

Any Private Sector Participant who has entered into a contract for an Infrastructure Project with

the Government/ Government Agency.

District PPP Committee

A committee constituted by Government at the District level to facilitate and co-ordinate

infrastructure projects under the PPP route.

Government

Government of Karnataka

682

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

Government Agency

Any department of the Government, any statutory authority, urban local body, or body

corporate, owned or controlled by the Government holding greater than 50% of the paid-up

share capital in such entity.

State High Level Clearance

Committee (SHLCC)

Committee constituted by Government under the chairmanship of Chief Minister under Section

3 of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act 2002.

Infrastructure

It includes all infrastructure sectors and sub-sectors as defined in Section III – APPLICABLE

SECTORS of this document (i.e. “PPP Policy for Infrastructure Projects, 2018”)and any

amendments/additions made thereof.

Infrastructure Project

A project in Infrastructure, in the sectors delineated in this Policy

Policy Wing

Policy Wing shall manage all activities related to policy, technical, legal and such other matters

related to PPP projects.

Appraisal Cell

Appraisal Cell to make recommendations to review and approve or disapprove project

proposals on the basis of Value-for Money and other considerations.

Approval Cell & Monitoring

Unit

Based on the recommendations of the Appraisal Cell, the Approval Cell will approve or

disapprove Project proposals on the basis of Value-for Money and other considerations.

PPP Cell

PPP Cell established by the Karnataka Government to manage all activities related to policy,

technical, legal and such other matters related to PPP projects.

Person

Any company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, that is a legal

entity

State Level Single Window

Agency for PPP

Agency constituted by Government at the State level for approval of projects up to limit as

imposed by Government from time to time.

Private Sector Participant

Means any Person other than:

a.

Central Government or Central Government Agency

b.

State Government or State Government Agency

c.

Any joint ventures between Central Government, Central Government Agencies,

Government and/or Government Agency, where there is no shareholding from private/

retail investors.

Public Need

Means a substantial or obvious community need for the proposed project based on all attendant

circumstances as compared to a mere convenience. The determination of “Public Need” shall

be taken by the relevant administrative department after considering (a) Common use and

needs of the community; (b) Appropriateness of the project in relation to the development plans

of the department; and (c) Possibility of the project otherwise not coming up.

Public Private Partnership

Construction/ Renovation/ Rehabilitation and Operation & Maintenance, or Operation &

Maintenance of an Infrastructure Project of the Central/State Government or Government

Agency for common use where a Private Sector Participant:

a.

has an investment; and

b.

is responsible for such construction/ renovation/ rehabilitation and operation &

maintenance, or operation & maintenance for a period of not less than 3 years, in each

case.

I. PREAMBLE

1.

Karnataka has the distinction of being one of the fastest growing economies in the country with a US $189 billion economy growing

at 7.6 per annum. The per capita Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) increased at a CAGR of 11 per cent between 2011-12

and 2016-17.

2.

Infrastructure has been one of the key priority areas for India and the Central Government has increased infrastructure spending at

a rapid pace during the last decade. However, the increase in India’s GDP in recent years has put tremendous pressure on its

inadequate infrastructure. There are vast parts of the country which are isolated economically as well as geographically. The

immense potential of these areas remains untapped. The lack of infrastructure not only results in reduced economic output, it also

translates into additional costs in terms of time, effort and money to access essential services such as health care and education.

Therefore, it is important that infrastructure development is given prime consideration for economic welfare.

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

683

3.

The World Bank (WB) and International Monetary Fund´s (IMF) economic forecasts both make the case for increased

infrastructure investment to support long-term growth. India is projected to grow at 7.40% of its gross domestic product (GDP) in

2018-2019 and 7.80 % in 2019-2020, as per the January 2018, economic forecasts of IMF, thereby making it the world’s fastest-

growing major economy, at least for the next two years. Thereby, there is a stronger need to focus on the development of

infrastructure and raising resources for financing India’s infrastructure requirement of INR 50 trillion by 2022.

4.

Infrastructure development has remained central to Karnataka’s efforts to deliver inclusive and robust growth. Clearly recognising

the need to develop high quality infrastructure as a means to achieve rapid economic growth, the Government of Karnataka (GoK)

had come out with an Infrastructure Policy in 1997. The Infrastructure Policy of 1997 was aimed at expanding and upgrading

infrastructure to meet the growing needs of the industrial and agricultural sectors, inviting private investment in infrastructure, and

adopting a co-ordinated and integrated approach to infrastructure development. The policy also had specific incentives and

concessions for infrastructure projects. However, with the efflux of time, there have been changes in the tax and stamp duty

regime, formulation of Government of India’s (GoI) policy of Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) in infrastructure projects, and the

concept of the Viability Gap Fund (VGF). In line with these changes, Government resolved to formulate the Infrastructure Policy of

2007 which was further amended in October, 2015.

5.

Kempegowda International Airport in Bengaluru is the 3

rd busiest airport in India. It is the successful green field international airport

conceived in PPP format, which became operational in May, 2008. It is one of the largest airports in India built with modern

technology and is ranked at the top in terms of quality of service and user experience. The State Government has 13% equity

shareholding in Bengaluru International Airport Limited.

6.

As Karnataka grows and takes its rightful place in the national and global economy, Government’s focus has remained on sound

policies and inclusive institutions. This is where the State’s strong economic frameworks come in to make the State’s economy

more resilient and ever more supportive of growth. Today, Karnataka has more than 20 policies across all relevant sectors such as

Aerospace and Defence, Biotechnology, IT, IT-enabled services, Innovation, Textiles, Agri-Business and Food Processing, Start-

up, Tourism, Animation Visual Effects Gaming, Semi-Conductor, Renewable Energy, Solar, Infrastructure, Road, Port, Grape

Processing and Wine, Pharmaceutical, NRI, etc. that improve productivity and wages, employment opportunities and outcomes.

7.

The New Industrial Policy 2014-19, envisions building a prosperous Karnataka through inclusive, sustainable & balanced industrial

development and lays emphasis on providing good infrastructure support for promotion of industries.

8.

The Government of Karnataka has also been a fast mover in providing appropriate policy pushes to new technologies. Karnataka,

a pioneer State, home to first electric vehicle in the country along with the required ecosystem is at the cusp of making a transition

to new mobility solutions. To make a transition to new electric mobility solutions and to allow Electric Vehicles sector to bloom,

Karnataka became the first State in the country to introduce a comprehensive and well-designed ‘Electric Vehicle and Energy

Storage Policy 2017’ by taking into account the aspirations of industry, the needs of the consumers etc.

9.

These policies have been evolved with a view to augment and expedite infrastructure development through active private sector

participation.Promotion of private investment has been high on the agenda of Government of Karnataka. However, infrastructure

challenges remain large and require public investment to encourage private investment to supplement.

10. Government has sought to deal with some of these constraints by implementing various programmes and projects departmentally

and through Government agencies. These are being financed through various sources including budgetary resources, grants and

loans from GoI, and bilateral and multi-lateral agencies.

11. Karnataka is embarking upon an infrastructure led development strategy. The Government recognises the experience from several

emerging markets and developing economies that bottlenecks and gaps in critical infrastructure in the State could hinder the

potential rate of growth of the State's economy. These targets are expected to be achieved by facilitating private sector investment

and rapidly upgrading technology. Government recognises that high levels of economic and industrial growth and job creation can

be achieved only if infrastructure develops at a commensurate pace. Government also recognizes that the private sector can play a

substantial role in infrastructure development and that given the right policies and frameworks, adequate private investment can

become available. Government has already taken several initiatives in this regard, envisaging significant investments in projects in

transportation (for airports, ports, railways and roads), tourism, power generation, urban infrastructure, etc. which leads to the

direct and indirect job creation related to infrastructure.

II. OBJECTIVES & BENEFITS OF INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY 2018

12. PPP Policy for Infrastructure Projects, 2018 envisages increasing the quality and quantity of infrastructure through the

implementation of a multi-year infrastructure Action Plan. The policy would focus on recognizing and embracing the key role of

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in enhancing infrastructure development. The impact of infrastructure on an economy depends

greatly on the policy environment within which the investment is made. The need for infrastructure development is so enormous

that all efforts need to be made to maximize the limited public sector resources through PPPs in the development and functionality

of infrastructure.

684

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

13. Government, therefore, proposes to provide and facilitate an increasing role for PPP - both in creating new infrastructure assets, as

well as in managing assets already created. By this, Government seeks to derive the following benefits, which would deliver better

value-for-money to the user:

a) Savings in costs due to innovative designs, timely project implementation and higher efficiencies in operations

b) Enhanced quality of services to users due to better managerial practices & efficiencies

c) Reduction in, and gradual elimination of, pricing constraints

d) Enabling public funds to be earmarked for other commercially non-viable but socially justifiable projects

e) Financial innovation and development of cost-effective solutions

f)

Greater employment opportunities in the infrastructure sector

14. PPP would be considered both in new Infrastructure Projects and in managing existing Infrastructure Projects. The specific option

to be followed would be based on specific requirements, for which Government may seek recommendations from experts/

professional agencies. Where necessary, Government may also set up independent advisory group(s) to assist in the formulation

of sector strategies and selection of suitable implementation options.

15. As far as possible, for all new investments in infrastructure, the option of implementing the project through PPPs would

be explored. Exceptions would be made with regard to projects in backward areas, or projects with high social relevance,

but which are prima-facie not financially viable. The following models would be considered, inter-alia, for PPPs:

a) Project implementation by Government/Government Agency followed by a medium or long-tenure O&M contract to a

private operator.

b) Project implementation by a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) set up by Government/Government Agency followed by

divestiture to a private operator after stabilization of operations.

c) Project Implementation by a private developer/operator or joint ventures with Government under a licence/concession

structure.

16. Government recognizes that for some projects it may be necessary for Government of India or Government to extend financial

support by way of equity participation, Viability Gap Fund

1, or other mechanisms in order to leverage the desired levels of private

finance. It is envisaged that the incentives/ financial support contemplated under this Policy are applicable:

a) For infrastructure projects where, in the opinion of the Government, the project is a public project set up for

common use, where such infrastructure would otherwise not be created; and

b) Only for bridging the viability gap for Infrastructure Projects on a PPP basis.

17. Given the experiences with the reform process in the last decade, it is felt that a consistent approach needs to be followed in all

infrastructure sectors, so that the process of development is both uniform and complementary. The PPP Policy for Infrastructure

Projects 2018 seeks to formulate the touchstone principles that would constitute the broad framework for the development of each

infrastructure sector.

18. In order to achieve this consistency, Government would develop multi-year Action Plans detailing the strategies and

implementation plans for each of the infrastructure sectors clearly setting out the role for PPP, which would allow for the provision

of adequate and reliable infrastructure services of high quality at affordable prices to users.

III.

APPLICABLE SECTORS2

19. The infrastructure sectors and facilities, which would be governed by this Policy, include the following:

Sectors

Sectors & Sub-sectors

1.Agri-Infrastructure

1.

Agriculture and horticulture markets.

2.

Floriculture parks and markets.

3.

Agro-food processing and allied infrastructure (including common-user cold storage facilities).

4.

Agriculture and horticulture

a. Terminal storage

b. Post-harvest storage infrastructure

c. Logistics parks

d. Warehouses.

5.

Fisheries, Animal Husbandry Parks and Dairy infrastructure

1 As per Guidelines on Support to Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of

Economic Affairs, Government of India

2Vide Government Order No. IDD 07 ITS 2013 dated 30.10.2015.

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

685

Sectors

Sectors & Sub-sectors

2.Education

1.

Infrastructure and facilities for educational institutions, not on a purely commercial basis, but which

satisfy a public need.

2.

Knowledge City

3.

Vocational Training

4.

Skill Development

5.

Science & Technology parks

6.

E-Libraries

3.Energy

1.

Power generation, including captive power generation, as per provisions of the Electricity Act

2003, and co-generation projects, transmission, distribution and power trading services.

2.

Oil and Gas (origination, terminals, transmission and gas works).

3.

Renewable and non-conventional energy sources (Wind, Hydro, Solar, Tidal, Biomass and MSW).

4.Healthcare

1.

Infrastructure and facilities for healthcare, not on a purely commercial basis, but which satisfy a

public need.

2.

Infrastructure and facilities for healthcare

a.

Primary

b.

Secondary

c.

Tertiary

3.

Nursing and Patient Care

4.

Diagnostic Centers

5.

Trauma and Rescue centers

6.

Rehabilitation and training centers for physically and mentally challenged persons.

7.

Geriatric Centers

8.

Medical Education Infrastructure

5.Industrial Infrastructure

1.

Industrial Parks (including Biotechnology, Information Technology parks, etc.).

2.

Special Economic / Free Trade and Export Promotion Zones.

3.

Industrial Estates and Industrial Townships.

4.

Marine Parks

5.

Food Parks

6.

Special Investment Regions

7.

Development of Specific Zones like National Investment and Manufacturing Zones

8.

Corridor Development

a.

Industrial Corridors

b.

Infrastructure Corridors

c.

Freight Corridors

9.

IT Services

6.Irrigation

Canals, Dams and Weirs

7.Public Markets

1.

Infrastructure and facilities for Public Markets, not on a purely commercial basis, but which satisfy

a public need.

2.

Markets to promote handicrafts and produces from women and specially abled persons

8.Tourism

1.

Amusement, Entertainment, Theme Park.

2.

Hotels/ Resorts.

3.

Convention and Exhibition Centers.

4.

Cultural Fairs.

5.

Cultural Centers.

6.

Golf Courses

686

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

Sectors

Sectors & Sub-sectors

7.

Hospitality Districts

8.

Special Tourism Region

9.

Wellness /eco/ wild life Tourism

10. Museum

11. Sports, Adventure related infrastructure

9.Transportation and

Logistics

1.

Roads (including bridges, interchanges and flyovers).

2.

Railway systems.

a.

Tunnels

b.

Viaducts

c.

Bridges

d.

Terminals

3.

Urban transport system: MRTS, LRTS, Monorail, High-Capacity bus systems and High Speed Rail

System

4.

Airports and Airstrips.

5.

Minor Ports and Harbours.

6.

Inland Water Transport.

7.

Bus/ Truck/ Urban Transport Terminals and associated public facilities such as Public Amenities

Centers.

8.

Warehousing infrastructure (including container freight stations, container depots, cold storage

facilities and tank farms).

9.

Mechanized and Multi-storey Parking Facilities.

10. Transport Terminals

a. Inter-modal Transit Centers

b. Traffic Management Centers

11. Parking Facilities

a.

Surface Parking.

b.

Underground public parking facilities

10.Urban and Municipal

Infrastructure

1.

Township Development.

2.

Commercial development with common-user facilities.

3.

Water Supply and Sewerage.

4.

Desalination.

5.

Wastewater recycling and reuse.

6.

Solid Waste / Bio-Medical Waste/ Hazardous Waste: collection, transportation, treatment and

disposal facilities.

7.

Energy Efficiency in

a. Street Lighting

b. Traffic signal management

8.

Signage

9.

e-waste management

11.Sports and Youth

Services

1. Sports Infrastructure

2. Art & Culture Theaters

3. Playgrounds/sports/stadiums

4. Hostels/quarters in the Games villages.

5. Sports training centers and Gyms

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

687

Sectors

Sectors & Sub-sectors

12.Housing

1.

Low cost / EWS housing

2.

Affordable housing

13.Rural Development

1.

Waste to energy (agri-waste)

2.

Rural Drinking Water projects

14.Tele communications

1.

Telecommunication -Fixed network: Optic fibre/cable networks which provide broadband/internet.

2.

Telecommunication Towers

In all cases, it is envisaged that the incentives/ financial support contemplated under this Policy are applicable only if the

conditions under Para 16 are met.The sectors/areas in the ambit of the Policy would be modified as and when appropriate.

IV

TOUCHSTONE PRINCIPLES

20. The Infrastructure Policy has been developed around the following main principles:

a)

Efficient use of existing assets and optimal allocation of additional resources

b)

Payment for services

c)

Equitable contractual structures

d)

Transparent process of procurement

e)

Fair regulatory framework

f)

Enabling institutional frameworks

g)

Sustainable incentives and concessions

A. EFFICIENT USE OF ASSETS AND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES

21. Government recognises that efficiency in allocation of resources can be achieved by prioritisation of projects in an objective and

unbiased manner. To this end, Government would first look at the option of better utilization of existing assets before new

investments are proposed. Priority would be accorded to those projects where development of critical linkages provide significant

network or linkage benefits, as in the case of a transportation link interfacing railways, roads and ports, or a power project in the

vicinity of a consumption centre.

22. Government would develop projects based on considerations of both social need and economic viability, the focus being integrated

infrastructure development. Government, however, recognises that “social” projects may not offer sufficient commercial incentive

for PPP. In such cases, Government would use other compensation mechanisms like provision of VGF, or annuity payments. As

an alternative, Government (or Government Agency) may implement such projects upfront and eventually transfer management of

services to a Private Sector Participant (PSP), where feasible.

23. Government would also develop objective criteria for rationalization of investments for expanding, upgrading and/or development of

infrastructure. Typically, project identification and prioritisation would be governed by the following considerations:

a)

magnitude of gap between demand and supply for the Infrastructure;

b)

focus on balanced regional development

3, especially with regard to provision of basic infrastructure;

c)

development of physical/inter-sectoral linkages where significant economic gains can be realized.

24. Since Government would actively promote PPP in infrastructure projects, a larger share of investable public funds could be used

for identified social needs that may not otherwise be amenable to private finance initiatives. In order to create a sustainable source

of Government funds for long-term infrastructure financing, Government would leverage internal and extra-budgetary resources

under various schemes such as the Infrastructure Initiative Fund (IIF), ASIDE (Assistance to States for Infrastructure Development

for Exports), Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT), Smart Cities and Viability Gap Fund (VGF), and

resources from KSIIDC, KUIDFC, and bilateral and multilateral agencies.

B.

PAYMENT FOR SERVICES

25. Government recognizes that in a system where pricing of services is not economically sustainable, users would have no incentive

to economise on their use of resources, and service providers would have no incentive to become more efficient. Government

believes that the inculcation of the “provider-charges” and the “user-pays” principles are fundamental to the success of PPPs. To

this end, Government would, where necessary and appropriate, consider levy of user charges (tolls, fees, tariffs, cesses etc.) to

meet the following objectives:

a)

Create a stable and dedicated financial source for construction/ redevelopment/ rehabilitation/ replacement of project assets

and their ongoing operations and maintenance in order to provide efficient, sustainable and high quality services at affordable

prices to users.

b)

Manage demand

3In line with the report of the Dr D M Nanjundappa Committee on addressing the regional imbalances

688

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

c)

Encourage PPP

d)

Cover costs of service provision

e)

Recognising that economically weaker sections may require certain subsidies in user charges, provide explicitly for such

subsidies to the project, to ensure that the project remains economically viable.

26. The levy of user charges would be based on one or more of the following criteria:

a)

Savings to users

b)

Willingness to Pay

c)

Need for explicit subsidies

d)

Uniformity between various projects

e)

Cost Recovery

f)

Debt service & Equity returns

C.

CONTRACTUAL STRUCTURES

27. Government would set in place appropriate contractual arrangements to give effect to the process of project implementation.

Government’s endeavour would be to develop contractual frameworks that would allow for equitable allocation of risks between the

contracting parties, taking into account the legitimate concerns of private investors. The attempt would be to allocate risks to the

party best suited to bear the risks. A matrix of typical project risks and risk mitigation measures is set out in Schedule I.

28. EXISTING ASSETS: The contractual/ implementation structures used would include the following:

a)

Management of the whole or part of the assets by private operators through

i.

Operations & Maintenance (O&M) contracts for pre-determined periods;

ii.

Lease of assets/Area Concession;

iii.

Rehabilitate, Operate, Maintain and Transfer (ROMT) contracts.

b)

Sale of whole or part of the assets

c)

Partial or full divestiture of the Undertaking

29. New Assets: Depending on the nature of the project, the contractual structures/ agreements used for new projects would include,

inter-alia:

a)

Build & Transfer (BT)

b) Build-Lease-Transfer (BLT)/Build-Own-Lease-Transfer (BOLT)

c) Build-Transper-Lease (BTL)

d) Build-Transfer-Operate (BTO)

e) Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)/Design-Build-Operate-Transfer (DBFOT)

f) Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT)/Design-Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (DBOOT)

g) Build-Own-Operate (BOO)

h) Build-Operate-Share-Transfer (BOST)

i) Build-Own-Operate-Share-Transfer (BOOST)

j) Build-Own-Lease-Transfer (BOLT)

k) Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM)

30. SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES:Where appropriate, Government/ Government Agencies may participate in the equity structure of

any SPV for the development and implementation of infrastructure projects. The selection of the PSP for participating in the SPV

would follow the procurement process set out in section 32. The equity structure of the SPV would be decided on a case-to-case

basis.

31. Government recognizes that creation ofInfrastructure under the PPP model requires that there be reasonable assurance that

competing facilities would not be created that would materially adversely affect the technical and financial viability of the project.

D.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS

32. All contracts would be awarded on the basis of a transparent process, under the ambit of the Karnataka Transparency in Public

Procurement Act (Act 29 of 2000), or under a “Swiss Challenge” format as set out in para 34. In all cases, the award criteria would

be spelt out upfront. The stages in the procurement process could be single-stage or multi-stage, depending on the size or level of

complexity of the project. For this purpose, Government may use the services Empanelled Consultants Consultants/advisers

empanelled by State or Central Government Generally, the stages in the procurement process would include:

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

689

a)

Expressions of interest (EOI)

b)

Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

c)

Request for Proposals (RFP)

d)

Technical and financial evaluation

e)

Signing of Agreements

33. The criteria used for selection would inter-alia include objective technical and for financial parameters, such as:

a)

Level of service, quality of assets offered;

b)

Lowest present value of Viability Grant support;

c)

Lowest quantum of land;

d)

Lowest present value of asset based support from the Government;

e)

Highest share (or present value of) of revenue;

f)

Lowest unit value or present value of payments by Government;

g)

Highest upfront payment (or present value of upfront payments);

h)

Highest present value of future payments;

i)

Lowest concession period;

j)

Lowest unit value or present value of user fees;

k)

Highest premium on (or present value of) equity shares offered.

l)

Reverse Auction

34. Swiss challenge or Suo-moto proposals to promote innovative projects by maximising competition & transparency

4:A

Private Sector Participant (Proposal Initiator) may submit a suo-moto and innovative proposal (Original Proposal) to

Government/Government Agency for setting up an Infrastructure Project containing the following:

a)

Articulation of the public need for the project;

b)

Requisite technical details, i.e., details of alignment/site, estimates of cost, etc.;

c)

Cost incurred by the Proposal Initiator for the development studies related to the project.

[i]

In respect of Suo-moto and innovative proposals:

1.

Only such proposal that has innovation in technology, that is unique and legally owned or authorised to be used by the

Proposal Initiator that could result in increased value addition; it may refer to incremental, emergent or revolutionary changes in

products, services and/or process. The proposal should not only be suo-moto but also innovative.

2.

Only such of the projects which do not require any financial support from the Government, shall be considered.

3.

Such of projects which would result in monopoly and exclusive rights shall not be considered.

4.

The requirement of land, if any, for the project would be considered for acquisition / allotment at the market rates / KIADB

allotment rates wherever required. Under no circumstances, no land will be made available at concessional rates.

5.

The following sectors are considered with the threshold limits of the project costs as indicated hereunder. The detailed

operational guidelines will be issued separately. These, however, may change from time to time.

Infrastructure Sectors

Threshold Limits

1. Agri-infrastructure

Projects costing Rs.25 crore and above.

2. Education

Projects costing Rs.25 crore and above.

3. Energy

Projects costing Rs.50 crore and above.

4. Healthcare

Projects costing Rs.50 crore and above.

5. Industrial Infrastructure

Projects costing Rs.100 crore and above.

6. Irrigation

Projects costing Rs. 500 crore and above for major

irrigation projects; and

Projects costing Rs.200 crore and above for minor irrigation

projects.

7. Public Markets

Projects costing Rs.25 crore and above.

8. Tourism

Projects costing Rs.50 crore and above.

9. Transportation and Logistics

Projects costing Rs.500 crore and above.

4Vide Government Order No. IDD 07 ITS 2013 dated 30.10.2015

690

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

Infrastructure Sectors

Threshold Limits

10. Urban and Municipal Infrastructure

Projects costing Rs.50 crore and above.

11. Sports and Youth Services

Projects costing Rs.50 crore and above.

12. Housing

Projects costing Rs.50 crore and above.

13. Rural Development

Projects costing Rs.25 crore and above.

14. Tele-communications

Projects costing Rs.100 crore and above.

6.

No VGF assistance would be available.

7.

A maximum of 4 months

5 shall be made available to the project proponent from the day of clearance by the SLSWA to submit

final proposals is along with DPR / PFR/ Feasibility report to enable to go ahead inviting competitive bidding for counter

proposals.

[ii]

Government would, in the first instance, assess the public need for the Infrastructure Project. In case the Infrastructure Project is

found to satisfy a public need, Government would assess the technical feasibility/ suitability of the Original Proposal and modify

the same, if required. Government may carry out additional studies for the project, if required.

[iii]

After evaluating the proposal and considering it suitable, Government would, put up competitive bidding for counter proposals

(“Swiss Challenge”). The Original Proposal (except proprietary information and details of the financial proposal) and contract

principles of the Original Proposal would be made available to any interested applicants. If the competitive bidding process

results in a superior proposal, the Proposal Initiator would be given an opportunity to match the competing counter proposal

within a stipulated time-frame, and be selected as the project concessionaire only if he is with 15% of the superior bid value. If

the Proposal Initiator declines to match the superior counter proposal, then the applicant who has made the superior proposal

would be selected as the concessionaire. Upon such selection, Government/ Government Agency concerned shall cause/

arrange to reimburse to the Proposal Initiator, a part or the whole of the project development costs, as determined upfront and

declared in the bidding documents, and may recover the same from the successful bidder. In order to encourage competition in

the bidding process, the superior bidder, in the event the project is not offered to him would be reimbursed/ compensated to an

extent an amount not exceeding 0.10% of the cost of the project, or, Rs.20.00 lakhs, whichever is less.

35.

Government would evaluate all proposals received for any Infrastructure Project. Government may also choose to appoint

suitable external advisors or consultants, where necessary, for the purposes of evaluation.

36.

In order to facilitate expeditious project implementation, Government would endeavour to conclude the evaluation process for all

Infrastructure Projects within 90 days from the date of submission of the final proposals. In the case of suo-moto proposals,

Government would decide to proceed with the bidding process within 180 days of their submission. In any event, Government

would endeavour to provide all necessary State-level clearances and enable implementation of any Infrastructure Project being

taken up through Public Private Partnerships within 180 days from the date of submission of the final proposals for such project.

E.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

37. Given that availability of unencumbered land in a time-bound manner is a critical pre-requisite for most Infrastructure Projects,

Government intends to set in place suitable mechanisms, for facilitating expeditious acquisition of land for such projects. If found

necessary, Government would also consider promulgating a specific legislation for expeditious acquisition of land for infrastructure

projects covered under this Policy.

38. Since many infrastructure facilities and services have natural monopoly characteristics, independent regulation may be desirable to

ensure that the interests of both users and service providers are kept in view.

39. Government intends to set up independent regulatoryauthorities

6for some of the infrastructure sectors. The role of the regulator

would include setting norms for entry and exit, tariff fixation, and establishing standards for construction, operations and

maintenance for the facilities/services. However, the setting up the regulatory authorities would be decided based on the specifics

of each sector.

F.

INSTITUTIONAL FRAME WORK

40. At present the process of project identification and development is handled by the various Government departments and agencies

and in case of urban projects by the respective urban local bodies. The Infrastructure Development Department (IDD) of the

Government of Karnataka, which has been set up as the nodal agency to streamline the process of appraisal and approval of

Infrastructure Projects, shall facilitate various Government departments in developing Infrastructure Projects through PPPs.

41. Infrastructure Development Department through the “PPP Cell” would manage all activities related to policy, technical, legal and

such other matters related to PPP projects. The PPP Cell is headed by theAdditional Chief Secretary, Infrastructure Development

Department and will be adequately staffed.

5Revised to 4 months vide corrigendum order No. IDD 59 ITS 2009 dated 16.08.2010

6Also multi-utility regulators

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

691

42. IDD would be duly strengthened with staff having appropriate skills to enable it to co-ordinate and integrate the necessary

procedures and processes for facilitating Government/Government Agencies in expeditious project approval and implementation.

Experts in domain areas such as finance, procurement, urban and engineering would be hired by IDD either directly or through an

agency to work exclusively for infrastructure projects and assigned within respective departments for seamless reporting and co-

ordination with departments. Simultaneously, capacity would also be built up in Government/Government Agencies at the State

and District level, to formulate and implement Infrastructure Projects on PPP basis. Services of empanelled consultants/advisors

may be hired by the respective Departments/Government agencies for structuring of PPP projects and submit to IDD for approval.

43. The PPP Cell may also engage consultants as and when necessary. The PPP Cell will be the nodal agency to receive the

proposals in respect of the PPP projects and place them before the SWA for consideration and approval. The PPP Cell may

invite/co-opt representatives from the private sector, nominated by State-level Industrial fora such as ASSOCHAM, CII, FKCCI, and

KASSIA et.al.

44. Government will set up a District PPP Committees at the District level, to co-ordinate and facilitate the implementation of

infrastructure projects, including facilitation for obtaining clearances and approvals on a PPP route. The District PPP Committee

shall be chaired by the Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district. The District PPP Committee shall have officers of

appropriate rank, nominated by the Government, as well as upto three representatives from the private sector, nominated by State-

level Industrial fora such as ASSOCHAM, CII, FKCCI, and KASSIA et.al.

45. KSIIDC will act as a nodal agency to assist the Government in the development of PPP policies and programme, review and

monitor PPP projects during implementation, execution and management and make suitable recommendations to the Government

for its consideration and adoption. KSIIDC would be establishing a Policy Wing to manage all activities related to policy, technical,

legal and such other matters related to PPP projects. KSIIDC would also setup an Appraisal Cell to make recommendations to

review and approve or disapprove Project proposals on the basis of Value-for Money and other considerations. Financial Support

under the Karnataka Viability Gap Fund Scheme and recommendations for such allocation of the Fund for Projects would be

placed by the KSIIDC for IDD’s approval.

46. KSIIDC,if so directed by IDD, would also assist the respective departments in the project development and procurement process,

where such assistance is requested. Alternatively, these services could be procured from Empanelled Consultants by State or

Central Government as suitably identified and selected by the departments concerned and accordingly the proposal could be sent

to the KSIIDC to be placed for approval by IDD.

47. A State Level Single Window Agency (SLSWA) has been set up at the State Level under the Chairmanship of the Chief Secretary

to approve the projects under PPP projects upto Rs. 500 crore, and to recommend the projects above Rs. 500 crore to the State

High Level Clearance Committee (SHLCC) under the Chairmanship of the Hon’ble Chief Minister constituted under Section (3) of

the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act 2002. In the case of all PPP proposals upto Rs. 500 crore, the concerned Department

shall, in consultation with the Infrastructure Development Department place them before the State Level Single Window

Agency[SLSWA] for PPP headed by the Chief Secretary for approval. For all proposals in excess of Rs. 500crore, the State Level

Single Window Agency for PPP will scrutinize the proposals and make its recommendations to the State High Level Clearance

Committee [SHLCC], headed by the Honb’ble Chief Minister, for approval. The IDD, as the nodal Department for PPP, will assist

the concerned Departments in the evaluation of all such projects. The IDD shall also assist the State Level Single Window Agency

for PPP and SHLCC in evaluating and deciding upon the specific proposals.

48. POST AWARD GOVERNANCE AND PROJECT MONITORING

7:

i.

It is essential to continuously monitor the performance of the PPP projects over the project life cycle in accordance with the

Planning Commission guidelines on “Institutional Mechanism for monitoring of PPP projects” issued vide OM

No.14011/09/2008-Infra (Part-II) dated 08.08.2012 of Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India.

ii.

The institutional structure for monitoring PPP projects requires the creation of a two-tier mechanism for monitoring PPP

projects. The PPP Cells within each department will have a Project Monitoring Unit (PMU) which monitors the projects

through a reporting mechanism. The Monitoring Reports for each project would include compliance of contract terms,

adherence to time lines, assessment of performance, remedial measures and imposition of penalties.The State Level

Performance Review Unit (PRU) set up under KSIIDC would review the PPP Project Monitoring Reports submitted by the

different PMUs and oversee or initiate action for rectifying any defaults or lapses.

iii.

KSIIDC will setup a suitably designed information management system to seek information from various project

implementation departments/agencies to compile the aforesaid quarterly reports.

7Vide Government Order No. IDD 07 ITS 2013 dated 30.10.2015

692

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

49. IDD would set out the process for scrutinizing and clearing all investment proposals, frame guidelines for assessing the feasibility

of private investment, set in place standard procurement documents and framework agreements, and assist the

Government/Government Agencies in the procurement of developers. IDD would also facilitate the Government/Government

Agencies, to develop and implement Infrastructure Projects in the PPP format, in an expeditious manner.

50. In order to facilitate financing of project development and implementation in an efficient, sustainable and expeditious manner,

Government would use “Infrastructure Initiative Fund”, “Indian Infrastructure Project Development Fund” (IIPDF) and “National

Investment and Infrastructure Fund” (NIIF) along with its “Karnataka Infrastructure Project Development Fund” (KIPDF). IDD would

set out the policy and regulatory guidelines and provide the necessary institutional support for operation and management of the

Fund. All fees and charges

8 accruing from project development and investment initiatives of IDD/ concerned Government/

Government Agency, would be credited to the Infrastructure Initiative Fund. Government would also make contributions to the

Fund through budgetary provisions and/or other sources, from time to time, as it may deem appropriate.

51. Based on the strategy developed for each sector, IDD, in consultation with Government Departments/Agencies, would prepare a

road map for infrastructure development in the State that will:

a)

Identify critical projects in different sectors that need immediate attention;

b)

Identify projects where significant benefits of network extension can be exploited for integrated infrastructure development;

c)

Explore the scope for PPPs in developing new Infrastructure Projects and augmenting existing infrastructure facilities and

encourage such participation through appropriate incentives;

d)

Prepare a shelf of projects for posing on a PPP format;

e)

Mobilize resources through appropriate policy measures to supplement private sector investment, especially in the case of

commercially non-viable projects;

f)

Identify and resolve bottlenecks in the institutional framework that are likely to impede investments and therefore provide a

conducive environment for infrastructure development through PSP;

g)

Facilitate the conversion of approved projects into the implementation phase.

52. The institutional roles and responsibilities are set out in Schedule II.

53. Government also recognizes the role of public opinion and stakeholder participation in facilitating Infrastructure Project

development and implementation. Since the viability of projects is contingent upon cost to the final user, it is important to ascertain

“what the market can bear”. Mobilizing public opinion and ensuring stakeholder participation is thus an integral part of Infrastructure

Projects. IDD would collaborate with professional bodies, NGOs, Industry Associations, and User Groups in facilitating this

process.

G.

INCENTIVES AND CONCESSIONS

54. Government would provide the incentives and concessions set out in Schedule III to promote private finance initiatives in

infrastructure development. These would be available to all projects falling in the ambit of Para 19 of this Policy. Investors would be

eligible for any other additional incentives and/or concessions proposed/available for projects under existing sectoral

policies/proposed sector-specific strategies, but Government shall take a holistic view of the totality of incentives and concessions,

vis-à-vis the viability requirements of the project. In addition, several of these projects would also enjoy tax benefits under the

Income Tax Act, 1961, as delineated by the Government of India.

55. In case of projects where no private investments in the form of private equity participation are envisaged, and where the

Government agency or implementing authority directly awards the project to a contractor following a standard procurement

process, but not under a specific concession structure as described in Para 28-30of this document, no incentives and concessions

would be available under this Policy.

56. Subsidies in the Infrastructure sector would be based on the need for balancing adequate cost recovery, with social needs and

regional development. Wherever subsidy is necessitated for social/ regional needs, it shall be the endeavour of the Government to

ensure that such subsidies are direct and transparent. In all other cases, it shall be the endeavour to price services to be

commensurate with the real costs of service provision, and sustainability of the project.

57. To the extent that the project parameters may permit, every project shall endeavour to maximise employment opportunities to the

local population of the State of Karnataka.

V

MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF POLICY

58. The PPP Policy for Infrastructure Projects, 2018, will be translated into a comprehensive Plan of Action where Government would

develop multi-year Action Plans detailing the strategies and implementation plans for each of the infrastructure sectors.

59. An Empowered Committee will be constituted by the Government, under the Chairmanship of Additional Chief Secretary,

Infrastructure Development Department to facilitate coordination and planning from various departments and thereby make

8 Such as project development fees, application/tender charges, concession payment, interest charges guarantee payments, taxes,

cess etc.,

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

693

recommendations to State High Level Clearance Committee regarding the development of policies, directives, manuals and

guidelines in a timely manner for taking mid-course corrections.

60. The monitoring and evaluation of the policy would be done at the State level by the State High Level Clearance Committee under

the Chairmanship of Hon’ble Chief Minister.

61. Evaluation takes place at different instants while generally mid-way through the policy cycle or programme implementation and at

the end. The output of an evaluation can be used as the basis for new policy initiatives. The Evaluation of the PPP Policy for

Infrastructure Projects 2018, will be carried out through neutral and credible agencies once every three years and the results will be

placed before the State High Level Clearance Committee. The programmes and interventions will be tweaked and redesigned on

the basis of these results and as per evolving infrastructure needs in the State.

VI

DURATION AND REVIEW OF POLICY

62. This policy would come into force with effect from the date of issue of Government notification and would be effective till the

formulation of a new infrastructure policy.

63. There would be a mid-term review of this Policy every three years based on a critical assessment of feedback from stakeholders,

and changes in scope that are deemed necessary and desirable, would be incorporated at that stage.

64. The Government recognises that expanding and institutionalising the scope of PPP in provision of infrastructure may also

necessitate appropriate changes in the existing legislative framework. It is however felt that the present framework offers sufficient

scope for PPPs in provision of infrastructure. The specific legislative constraints for PPPs would also be reviewed and addressed

during the mid-term review.

VII

SECTORAL STRATEGIES

65. The broad principles set out in this document would govern the various strategies to be developed for each sector. The concerned

administrative departments would finalize the sector strategies and action plans thereunder within six months of the date this Policy

comes into force.

66. IDD would assist Government/Government Agencies in making a concerted effort to set out an action plan for already identified

project development opportunities in various infrastructure sectors in the immediate term. IDD would interface with other

Departments concerned, such as, the Public Works, Ports & Inland Transport Department, Urban Development Department,

Energy Department, Commerce & Industries Department, and Department of Information, Tourism & Youth Services, among

others, to advise on and co-ordinate the identified and new project development activities.

VIII

SPECIAL THRUST TO DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN HYDERABAD-KARNATAKA REGION

9:

67. Given the special status to the Hyderabad-Karnataka region during the year 2013 under Article 371 J of the Constitution of India,

the following measures shall be taken to encourage the development of infrastructure in this region:

a.

Infrastructure Strategic Action plan for the region that would address key social and economic Infrastructure such as roads and

bridges, healthcare, educational, drinking water supply, minor irrigation, animal husbandry, sericulture and urban development.

b.

Create a PPP cell in the Hyderabad- Karnataka Area Development Board (HKADB) which will be equipped to:

i.

Identify potential PPP projects that can be undertaken in the region

ii.

Facilitate selection of private developers for implementation of various projects

iii.

Oversee performance of these projects

c.

A committee under the Chairmanship of Additional Chief Secretary, IDD would be constituted to monitor the progress of

projects on a quarterly basis.

d.

Government shall undertake specific capacity building programs for the officers in the region to understand the need and

benefits of PPP. All projects being implemented on PPP mode would be fast tracked to ensure faster delivery of services.

IX

MODEL BID DOCUMENTS, POLICIES AND RULES FORMULATED BY GOVT OF INDIA

10:

68. Govt. of India has brought out several model bid documents for various sectors.The State willadopt them for PPP projects

undertaken in the State.The State will considerpolicies and rules on PPP as and when formulated by Govt. of India.

9Vide Government Order No. IDD 07 ITS 2013 dated 30.10.2015

10Vide Government Order No. IDD 07 ITS 2013 dated 30.10.2015

694

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

SCHEDULE I-EVALUATION OF RISKS & RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

Projects are subject to various types of risks during the development, construction and operations periods. In a PPP

framework, these risks are typically assigned to the parties best able to handle them. The table below sets out the typical project risks

envisaged during the project life-cycle and their mitigation measures in a standard Concession (BOT) contract.

Risk Description

Assigned to

Risk Mitigation Measure

I. Project Development Period

Statutory clearances needed prior to

implementation including

Environmental Clearance

EPC Contractor/

Concessionaire

Government shall facilitate obtaining all such clearances

Land Acquisition

Concession Agreement

(CA)

Government shall set in place appropriate process to

expedite land acquisition. However, prior to tendering of any

infrastructure project, minimum 70% of the required land for

the project should be available for implementation. If the

land available is less than 70%, the project will not be put to

tender.

Delay in Land acquisition

CA

-do-

II. Construction Period

Project Design Risk

EPC Contractor /

Concessionaire

Detailed technical evaluation by independent Technical

Consultant.

Independent Engineer entrusted with detailed scope of work

to ensure that project conforms to design standards and

specifications.

Political Force Majeure Event (War,

invasion, armed conflict or act of

foreign enemy, strikes, agitation,

blockade, embargo, insurrection,

military action, civil commotion)

Non Political Force Majeure (Floods,

Earthquakes, Drought, etc).

CA

Agreement typically lays down provisions for extension in

time, sharing of costs and payment of compensation by the

Contracting Authority under such events.

Damage/Injury to 3

rd parties

EPC Contractor /

Concessionaire

Insurance generally procured by EPC Contractor with an

extension of cross liability

Cost Overrun Risk

EPC Contractor /

Concessionaire

Construction cost estimates

Independent revalidation of construction costs estimated by

EPC Contractor.

Fixed time/fixed price contracts. Risk related to cost overrun

passed on to the EPC Contractor.

Insurance Cover

Project Completion/Time Overrun

Risk

EPC Contractor /

Concessionaire

Fixed time /fixed price contract with EPC Contractor

Performance

Security

provided

by

EPC

Contractor,

including defects liability period

Retention Money

Equity stake in project SPV

Inflation Risk

EPC Contractor /

Concessionaire

Transferred to the EPC Contractor / Concessionaire under

the EPC Contract

Technology Risk

EPC Contractor /

Concessionaire

Concessionaire to provide warranties /commitments to

upgrade technology to meet output specifications

Termination Risk

Promoters/

Concessionaire/Lenders

Termination Compensation

Substitution/Step-in Rights to Project lenders

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

695

Risk Description

Assigned to

Risk Mitigation Measure

III. Operations Period

Traffic/ Demand Risk

Concessionaire/ CA

Depending on project

Detailed

Traffic

Studies

by

independent

traffic

consultant/expert.

Annuity structures/ Financial Support

Revenue Risk

Concessionaire/ CA

Traffic surveys/ willingness-to-pay studies

Annuity structures / Financial Support

Revenue Leakage Risk

Concessionaire/ CA

Origin-Destination surveys; tolling infrastructure, monitoring

systems

Independent Auditor

Maintenance Standards

O&M Contractor/

Concessionaire

Performance Security

Monitoring by Independent Engineer.

Increase in O & M costs

O&M Contractor/

Concessionaire

Fixed Price Contract

Injury to the Project road users/third

parties

O&M Contractor/

Concessionaire/ Insurance

Co.

Insurance Cover

Environmental Risk

O&M Contractor/

Concessionaire

Concessionaire/ O&M Contractor to meet the accepted

environmental norms during the operations period. This

could be enforced through suitable clauses in the

Concession Agreement.

Termination Risk

CA/Concessionaire/Lenders

Termination Compensation

Substitution/ Step-in-Rights to Project Lenders.

IV. Financing Risks

Equity

Sponsors/Investors

Sponsors generally required to maintain in aggregate a

minimum shareholding in the paid up equity capital of the

Concessionaire.

Project lenders insulated from risk related to equity

subscription

Term Debt

Lenders

Suitable security creation

Interest Rate Risk

Concessionaire

Fixed interest rates on debt, with reset options

Adverse FX Risk

Concessionaire/CA

Funding through Rupee debt

In case of forex funding for critical projects, exchange rate

risk could be fully borne by Concessionairethrough

appropriate agreements and hedging mechanisms

V. Other Risks

Expropriation, including creeping

nationalization, changes in legislation,

discriminatory actions on tolls, etc.

CA

Such acts defined as direct political force Majeure events

and remedies are generally provided under the Concession

Agreement.

SCHEDULE II -INSTITUTIONAL ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

Govt./ Govt. Agency/

Organization

Key Tasks

Government of Karnataka

(GoK)

a.

Formulation and review of policy measures

b.

General administration of policy measures

c.

Co-ordination between various departments for facilitating project implementation

d.

Performance evaluation

696

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

Infrastructure Development

Departmentassisted by KSIIDC,

GoK

a.

co-ordination of policy level initiatives

b.

assistance to SHLCC and SLSWA for evaluation of all Infrastructure Project proposals to

be implemented through PPP

c.

to establish a Policy Wing to manage all activities related to policy, technical, legal and

such other matters related to PPP projects. The Policy Wing will be managed by suitably

qualified and experienced persons.

d.

to act as a nodal agency to the Government in the development of PPP policies and

programmes, and make suitable recommendations to the Government for its consideration

and adoption;

e.

to conceptualise and identify Projects and ensure their conformance to the objectives of the

State;

f.

to advise the Government as the case may be, on the project and give recommendations

or suggestions;

g.

to encourage participation of private sector persons in financing, construction, maintenance

and operation of projects;

h.

to co-ordinate between inter departmental/ agencies of the Government;

i.

to monitor the competitive bidding process and suo-moto proposals and provide for course

correction, if required;

j.

to prioritise projects to be undertaken and prepare an inventory of projects to be taken up

for implementation;

k.

to identify inter-sectoral linkages;

l.

to setup an Appraisal Cell to make recommendations in matters of promoting of

infrastructural projects needing Central Government interventions or clearances.

m.

review and approve or disapprove project proposals and other considerations.

n.

review and suggest amendments and modifications to Concession Agreements on the

basis of Value-for-Money and similar considerations;

o.

to decide financial support under the Karnataka Viability Gap Fund Scheme and approve

allocation of the Fund for Projects;

p.

to approve scale and scope of a suo-mo to proposal or project undertaken through Swiss-

Challenge Approach and to recommend modifications of a non-financial nature, if required;

q.

to resolve issues relating to project approval process;

i.

to co-ordinate with Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, GOI, in

matters pertaining to approval of VGF under the scheme

ii.

to co-ordinate with Central Government ministries/departments/agencies with regard

to the implementation of the this including monitoring program in attracting private

sector involvement in infrastructure and evaluation of the implementation plan from

time to time.

r.

not being inconsistent to other applicable laws, prescribe time limits for clearances for any

project and assist the concessionaire in obtaining statutory and other clearances and

approvals in a timely manner;

s.

to review periodically the status of clearances;

t.

to develop model documents/agreements for the Infrastructure Sectors;

u.

to recommend projects for grant of viability gap fund under the relevant scheme(s) of

Government of India;

v.

review and monitor PPP projects during implementation, execution, operation and

management;

w.

to administer and manage the Fund and its assets;

State High Level Clearance

Committee

Facilitate and approve PPP projects over Rs. 500 crore

State Level Single Window

Agency

Facilitate, coordinate and scrutinise all PPP projects and approveprojects up to Rs.500 crore.

¨sÁUÀ 1

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018

697

District PPP Committee

a.

Facilitate project identification, development & implementation

b.

Facilitate co-ordination between various departments

c.

Facilitate obtaining clearances and approvals

SCHEDULE III -INCENTIVES AND CONCESSIONS

1.

The project would be allowed to charge user fees (tolls, port dues etc.) during the concession period.

2.

Recognising the fact that infrastructure projects require special consideration in view of long gestation periods, low rates of

return and higher risks, incentives and support such as tax holidays, tax exemptions, Viability Gap Fund, etc., have been provided under

the purview of the Government of India.

3.

Apart from the incentives, concessions and support available to the projects, the Government proposes to offer the following

incentives in addition to the incentives provided in the relevant policies with regard to sectors. However, duplication of incentives shall

not be considered:

A.

FACILITATION

a.

Where it is not possible for private investors to obtain land required for the project on their own, the Government would

acquire the land required for the project;

b.

Facilitation in obtaining clearances and approvals from various agencies;

c.

Facilitate in obtaining water and power required for the project.

B.

ASSET-BASED SUPPORT

a.

Government land may be provided, subject to availability, at concessional rates;

b.

Wherever an Infrastructure Project by itself is not financially viable, the private investor may be allowed to acquire

additional land on the same terms as the land for the main project, and develop suitable commercial activities to ensure

a reasonable composite internal rate of return. Such development rights would be consistent with applicable laws and

land-use, and would include commercial complexes, hotels, housing complexes, and advertisement hoardings. Where

permitted under local regulations, this would include relaxation in the applicable Floor-Space Index norms;

c.

Develop linkage infrastructure, for projects that need such critical linkages.

d.

This will not be available to the procurement made under Swiss Challenge Route.

11

C.

FOREGOING REVENUE STREAMS

a.

CONCESSION ON STAMP DUTY ON TRANSFER OF LAND

12:

Other than Hyderabad Karnataka Area

Hyderabad Karnataka Area

Zone 1 : 100 %

HK Zone 1 : 100%

Zone 2 : 100 %

HK Zone 2 : 100%

Zone 3 : 75 %

Zone 4 : nil

b. Concession on conversion fine on land:

Other than Hyderabad Karnataka Area

Hyderabad Karnataka Area

Zone 1 : 100 %

HK Zone 1 : 100%

Zone 2 : 100 %

HK Zone 2 : 100%

Zone 3 : 75 %

Zone 4 : nil

[Note: Zone 1: Most backward; Zone 2: More backward; Zone 3: Backward; Zone4: Industrially developed;Hyderabad Karnataka Area:

Districts of Bidar,Bellari, Gulbarga, Raichur, Koppal&Yadagiri]

D.

CONTINGENT GUARANTEES

In specific cases, guaranteed payment structures such as “Take-or-pay” (wherein there is an assurance of payment for the

availability of a service) or “supply-or-pay” (wherein there is an assurance of payment for the non-availability of a service)

would be considered.

E.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

a.

Viability gap finance from the Central Government: The Government of Karnataka would sponsor the project for

release of Viability Gap Fund, from the Government of India.

11Amended vide Corrigendum No IDD 59 ITS 2009 dated 31.05.2010

12The zones in this Policy shall be identical to that defined in the Industrial Policy, 2014 of GoK

698

PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, UÀÄgÀĪÁgÀ, DUÀ¸ïÖ 9, 2018 ¨sÁUÀ 1

b.

The Government of Karnataka would also provide additional Viability Gap Fund, over& above the VGF of the Central

Government.

c.

Provided that the quantum of total Viability Gap Fund shall be determined after clearly and explicitly calculating all

project costs and incentives/concessions:

i.

Taking into account all costs of the projects, excluding cost of land, and land related charges such as Stamp Duty

& Conversion Fine

ii.

Taking into account all other incentives granted, including asset based support and the foregoing of revenue

streams, and including any other financial incentive granted under any other sector policy, or scheme of the

Central Government, Central Government Agency, Government or Government Agency.

d.

This will not be available to the procurement made under Swiss-Challenge route

13.

P.R. 319

SC. 500

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka

M. Venkatesh Murthy

Under Secretary to Government

Infrastructure Development Department

ªÀÄÄzÀæPÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀæPÁ±ÀPÀgÀÄ:- ¸ÀAPÀ®£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥ÀvÀæ, ¸ÀPÁðj PÉÃAzÀæ ªÀÄÄzÀæuÁ®AiÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ-59.

13 Amended vide Corrigendum No IDD 59 ITS 2009 31.05.2010

R.N.I. No. KARBIL/2001/47147 POSTAL REGN. No. RNP/KA/BGS/2202/2017-19

Licensed to post without prepayment WPP No. 297