PART IV
Private Advertisements and Miscellaneous
Notifications
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
FINAL NOTIFICATION
ROC. No. 24503/05/Suit.
8th October 2009.
Ref:—1. Judgement of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala
dated 6-4-2006 in W.P. (C) 706/2005.
2. Audit report submitted by Finance and
Accounts Officer, Travancore Devaswom
Board.
3. Enquiry report of Deputy Devaswom
Commissioner (Inspection) dated 14-5-2008.
4. Proceedings of Travancore Devaswom
Board ROC 633/07/Est. I/Land dated
28-6-2008.
5. Preliminary Notification dated 22-12-2008
published in the Kerala Gazette dated
17-2-2009.
6. Opinion of Law Officer, Travancore
Devaswom Board dated 17-7-2009.
By Judgement cited 1st the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala
directed the Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore
Devaswom Board to conduct a detailed audit of accounts of
Ambattukavu Bhagavathy Temple, Aluva (hereinafter referred
to as the temple). On receipt of the above Judgement
Devaswom Commissioner appointed Finance and Accounts
Officer of Travancore Dewaswom Board to conduct the
audit and submit his report.
The team of auditors under Finance and Accounts
Officer verified the accounts of the Temple from 18-9-2006
t
o
24-9-2006. Finance and Accounts Officer reported under
reference 2nd cited, instance of serious financial
indiscipline, mismanagement and the like in temple.
Considering the above report and the Judgement,
Travancore Devaswom Board directed the Deputy
Devaswom Commissioner (Inspection) to conduct an
enquiry as per the provisions contained in section 36 of
Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act
(hereinafter referred as Act) Deputy Devaswom
Commissioner submitted his enquiry report under Ref. (3)
cited. He conducted the enquiry by summoning and
recording the statements of the parties connected with
the administration of the temple.
On the basis of the report of Deputy Devaswom
Commissioner (Inspection), Travancore Devaswom Board
has authorised Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore
Devaswom Board to proceed with the provisions of section
37 of the Act and to issue necessary orders to assume the
management of temple.
Before acting upon the order of the Board, I felt that it
is expedient for the opinion. Statutory notices under
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
38 & 39 of Act were issued to all the parties concerned,
calling upon to appear for personel hearing on 9-9-2008.
The parties were present and they were heard. They filed
written
statements through their Advocate Shri Hari Rao,
Advocate, High Court of Kerala. At the time of hearing
some of the parties have raised objections as to the legality
of the procedure adopted by this office. The Ambattukavu
Kshethra Samithy who are the trustees, argued that the copies
of enquiry reports were not served on them. It was also
argued that the procedure leading to the order read 4 above is
totally against the provisions envisaged under section 36 of
the Act and the process is vitiated owing to the irregularity in
the procedure. I find that these arguments have no merit,
whatsoever, since the audit and enquiry were conducted
properly as per the provisions of Section 37 of the TCHRI
Act, The enquiry and audit were conducted under the said
provisions by issuing proper notice to the parties, summoned
them and duly recorded their statements and considered the
same. In short, all the persons concerned were given sufficient
and reasonable opportunity of being heard.
The audit report and enquiry report reveal serious
irregularities and misappropriation of funds and
mismanagement of the temple. In these circumstances I have
decided to proceed with the provisions under Section 37 (e)
of the Act for assumption of the management of temple.
A preliminary notification was published in the Kerala
Gazette under ref. (5) cited, calling upon the objections, if
any, on the decision to takeover the temple. I have considered
all the objection raised and heard the parties. At the time of
hearing the same objections were raised once again without
adducing any fresh evidence in support. As the objections
were already considered by me at the final hearing. ie., it is
true that the ownership of the temple is still vested with
Karinganampally Swaroopam. The present committee is only
as trustee acting on the basis of a trust deed. Karinganampally
Swaroopam, in their objections, pointed out that some of the
landed properties of the temple is still the property of
Karinganampally Swaroopam and that the entire land cannot
be taken possession alongwith the temple. It is also pointed
out by the parties that the intention to takeover the landed
properties alongwith the temple is violative of provisions of
the Act.
I have seriously considered the objections and gone
through the argument more appropriate and tenable. The
opinion of Law Officer, Travancore Devaswom Board has
also been obtained. According to him the temple property
and the property of Swaroopam are not distinctive and
hence the assumption of land alongwith the Temple is not
possible at this stage.
Considering all the facts and circumstances explained
above, I, P. V. Nalinakshan Nair, Devaswom Commissioner,
Travancore Devaswom Board appoint Administrative
Officer, Aluva, Travancore Devaswom Board as the
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
r
u/s 42 (1) of the Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious
Institution Act 1950. The appointment will be for a period of
3 years. It is also ordered that the present committee
functioning by virtue of the Trust Deed No. 205/93 of Sub
Registrar’s Office, Aluva dated 11-8-1993 stands dissolved
and removed under Section 41 of the Act. The Deputy
Devaswom Commissioner, Vaikom is directed to constitute
a new Temple Advisory Committee in the temple. The above
order will take effect on the date of this notification. The
Administrative Officer, Aluva is directed to take charge of
temple within 15 days until the final notification is published.
Other necessary orders will be passed as and when
circumstances arise.
P. V. NALINAKSHAN NAIR,
Devaswom Commissioner.
hn⁄m-]\w
(1)
B¿.-H.-kn. \º¿ 6156/03-/an-kv.3. 2009 sk]v‰w-_¿ 22.
Xncp: sIm®n lnμp dneo-Pn-bkv C≥Ãn-‰yq-j≥ BIv‰v
1950 (XV of 1950) A\p-kcn®v kn≤n-®n-´p≈ {]tXyI
A[n-Im-c-߃ D]tbm-Kn®v Imcm◊ Ah-Imiw d±p-sN-øp-∂-
Xn\v Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ tZhkzw t_m¿Un¬ \n∂pw ]ckyw
sNøp-∂-Xv.
Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ tZhkzw t_m¿Uns‚ A[o-\-X-bnepw
`c-W-Ønepw Ccn-°p-∂Xpw sIm√w {Kq∏n¬s∏´-Xp-amb
D]-cn-Ip∂w k_v{Kq-∏n¬s∏´ D]-cn-Ip∂w tZh-kz-Ønse
Imcm◊ ]©hmZyw {]h¿Øn kw_-‘n-®p≈ tPmen-Iƒ
\S-Øp-∂-Xn\v \ntbm-Kn-°-s∏´ a¶m´p IpSp-w_Ønse Bƒ
t]-cp-Im-c-\mb sI.-P-b-N-{μ≥ ]n≈ Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ Imcm◊
sdKp-te-j-\nse hyhÿIƒ°pw \n_‘-\-Iƒ°pw FXn-cmbn
{]h¿Øn-®pw, {]h¿Øn apS°w hcp-Øp-Ibpw sNbv-Xn-cn-
°p-∂-Xn-\mepw ]I-c-°m-c-\mbn a‰m-tcbpw \ntbm-Kn-°p-∂Xn\v
Imcm◊ aq∏\v km[n-°mØ kml-N-cy-Øn-epw Sn
tZh-kz-Ønse ]©-hmZyw tPmen°v ssZ\w-Zn\w \n¿hn-Lv\w
\S-tØ≠ Npa-X-e-bn¬ \n∂p Un∏m¿´p-sa‚n\v Hgn-bm≥
\n¿hm--l-an-√mØ \ne-bnepw Un∏m¿´p-sa‚ v Npa-X-e-bn¬ Bƒ
-G¿s∏-SpØn \S-Øn-h--cp-∂Xpw BbXv A`w-Kpcw XpS-tc-≠Xv
ÿm]-\-Øns‚ \ne-\n-ev]n\v AXy-¥m-t]-£n-X-am-sW∂v
ImWp-∂-Xn-\mepw D]-cn-Ip∂w tZhkzw ]©-hmZyw {]h¿Øn-
Iƒ \S-Øp-∂-Xn\v Ah-Imiw krjvSn-®n-´p-≈-Xpw, Sn Imcm◊
IpSpw-_-amb a‰v IpSpw-_-Øn¬ X’w-_-‘-amb F√m Ah-
Imi A[n-Im-c-ßfpw [Section 28 (2) of the Act and Rule 14 of
Rules regarding Karanma service published on Page 408
Devaswom Manual Vol-I] CXn-\m¬ Ahkm\n-∏n-°p-hm≥
t_m¿Uv Xocp-am-\n-°p-∂p. CXp kw_-‘n®v Fs¥-¶nepw
Bt£]ap≈]£w
hn⁄m-]\
XobXn
apX¬
c≠m-gvN-bv°Iw Cu B^o-kn-te°v tcJm-aqew X¿°w
sImSp-t°-≠-Xm-Wv. A{]-Imcw X¿°w C√ F¶n¬ Imcm◊
k¿hokv \n¿Ø¬sNbvXv Un∏m¿´p-sa‚n¬ \n∂pw Bsf
\ntbm-Kn®v ]©-hmZy {]h¿Øn XpS-cp-∂-Xm-sW-∂p≈ hnhcw
Adn-bn-°p-∂p.
(2)
B¿.-H.-kn.\º¿ 6981/04-/an-kv.III. 2009 sk]v‰w-_¿ 22.
1950˛se lnμp dneo-Pn-bkv C≥Ãn-‰yq-j≥kv BIv‰v 15 -
skIvj≥ 15-˛¬ 1, 2 A\p-k-cn®pw skIvj≥ 28-˛¬ 2 A\p-k-
cn®v AwKo-I-cn®pw XpS¿∂p h∂n-cp∂ hyh-ÿ-Iƒ {]Imcw
Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ tZhkzw t_m¿Uns‚ `c-W-Øn≥Io-gn-ep≈
D≈q¿ {Kq∏n¬s∏´ Ig-°q´w tZhkzw ]©-hmZyw {]hr-Øn-
t\m-°n -\-S-Øp-∂-Xn\v Xncp-h-\-¥-]pcw Pn√-bn¬ Xncp-h-\-¥-
]pcw Xmeq-°n¬ Dfn-bm-gvØpd hnt√-Pn¬ AWn-bq¿ Iotg
ssIX-d-hoSv
F∂
IpSpw-_-Øn\v
Imcm◊
Ah-Imiw kn≤n-®n-´p-≈-Xm-Ip-∂p. F∂m¬ Sn ]©-hmZyw
tPmen°v hcp-∂-Xn\v Sn IpSpw-_-tذv ASpØ Ah-Im-in-
I-fn¬s∏´ Bcpw C√m-sb∂v ImWn®v IpSpw-_- aq-∏s‚
At]£ e`n-®n-´p-≈-Xn-\m¬ Sn Imcm◊ Ah-Imiw hnRvPm-
]\ XobXn apX¬ d±p sNøp-∂-Xn\v Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ tZhkzw
t_m¿Un¬ \n∂pw Xocp-am\w FSp-°p-∂p. t_m¿Uns‚ Cu
X
o
c
p
-
a
m
-
\
-
Ø
n
¬
_‘-s∏´ I£n-Iƒ°v Bt£]ap≈-]£w BbXv,
]c-ky-s∏-Sp-Ønb XobXn apX¬ 30 Znh-k-Øn-\Iw sk{I-´dn,
Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ tZhkzw t_m¿Uv, \¥≥tIm-Sv,
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw-˛3 F∂ hnem-k-Øn¬ FgpXn Adn-bn-
t°-≠-Xm-Wv.
\n›nX ka-b-]-cn-[n-°Iw Bt£]w H∂pw e`n-°m-Ø-
]£w Cu {]mY-anI hn⁄m-]\w A¥n-a-hn-⁄m-]-\-ambn
]cn-K-Wn-°-p∂-Xm-Wv.
Xncp-hn-Xmw-Iq¿ tZhkzw t_m¿Un\p-th-≠n,
(H-∏v)
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw.
sk{I-´-dn.