Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1599/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Mattupetty

Estate, Mattupetty P. O., Munnar via., Idukki-685 612 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate

Employees Union (CITU), Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Balamurugan, CR

No. 5217 of Kuttiar Division from service by the

management of Mattupetty Estate is justifiable?

If not, what relief he is entitled to?

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2011

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVI

hmeyw 56

}

}

29th November 2011

2011 \hw-_¿ 29

8th Agrahayana 1933

1933 A{K-lm-b\w 8

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

47

29th NOV. 2011]

KERALA GAZETTE

192

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1600/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Mattupetty

Estate, Mattupetty P. O., Munnar via., Idukki-685 612 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Workers Congress

(INTUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Smt. Shanmugathai,

No. 7340, Worker, South Division, Chockanad,

Mattupetty Estate by the management is justifiable?

If not, what reliefs she is entitled to?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1626/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing

Director, Kerala State Beverages Corporation Ltd.,

Thiruvananthapuram 2. The Manager Kerala State

Beverages Corporation, Attingal and the workman of the

above

referred

establishment

represented

by

Smt. P. Vijayamma, Vice President, AITUC Kerala State

Council, Sugathan Smarakam, T.C. 25/507, Mosque Lane,

Thampanoor, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Maheswari, Sweeper, Warehouse, Attingal by

the management of KSBC is justifiable? If not,

what relief she is entitled to?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1619/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Pallivasal

Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Workers Congress (INTUC), Munnar P. O.,

Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Smt. Leela, No. 3581,

Power House Division, Pallivasal Estate by the

management is justifiable? If not, what relief she is

entitled to?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1620/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing

Director, Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Bristo Road,

Wellington Island, Kochi-682 003, 2. The Manager,

Wallardie Estate, Vandiperiyar and the workman of the

above referred establishment represented by the President,

Highrange Plantation Employees Union (INTUC), Ealappara

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

29th NOV. 2011]

KERALA GAZETTE

193

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Idustrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Sri Rajamani,

CR No. 4430, by the management of Wallardie

Estate is justifiable?

2.

If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1621/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Guderale

Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki District-685 612 and the

workman of the above referred establishment represented

by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union

Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Inustrial Tribunal, Idukki. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Sri Varghese,

No. 4391, Employee, Factory Division, Guderale

Estate by the management is justifiable?

If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1622/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Manager,

St. Thomas English Medium School, Kurampala,

Panthalam P. O., Pathanamthitta, 2. The Secretary,

St. Thomas English Medium School, Kurampala,

Panthalam P. O., Pathanamthitta and the workman of the

above referred establishment Smt. Mariyamma, T. A.,

Nilavarayyathu, Kurampala, Panthalam, P. O. in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employement

to

Smt. Mariyamma, Clerk, St. Thomas English Medium

School, Kurampala by the management is

Justifiable? If not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1623/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni

Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Workers Congress (INTUC), Munnar P. O.,

Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Inustrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Idustrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Yesurajan, No. 4967,

East Division, Nallathanni Estate by the

management is justifiable? If not, what relief he is

entitled to?

29th NOV. 2011]

KERALA GAZETTE

194

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1624/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manging Director,

Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Limited, Valanjavattom

P. O., Thiruvalla-689 104 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by 1. The General

Secretary, PRF Workers Union (CITU), Valanjavattom P. O.,

Thiruvalla-689 104, 2. The General Secretary, PRF Labour

Union (STU), Valanjavattom P. O., Thiruvalla-689 104 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the 7 Lower Grade Employees namely,

C. K. Soman, T. S. Narayanan, C. D. Raichal,

K. P. Gracy, Biji Varghese, K. D. Madhusoodhanan

Nair and C. A. Rajan who were promoted to semi

skilled during January 2000 were eligible to semi

skilled grade promotion prior to 2000 and

subsequent grade promotion as per the settlement

dated 12-7-2007 ?

2.

If yes, what relief they are entitled to?

(10)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1625/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

M. R. F. Limited, Vadavathoor, Kottayam and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by 1. The

Secretary, M.R.F. Employees Union, CITU, Vadavathoor,

Kottayam, 2. The Secretary, M.R.F. Employees Association,

INTUC, Vadavathoor, Kottayam, 3. The Secretary M.R.F.

Employees Sangh, B.M.S., Vadavathoor, Kottayam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the fixing of Camera by MRF Management

in the Canteen will lead to any change in the

condition of service of the employees?

2.

If yes, what is the remedy?

(11)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1663/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. Sumangalamma,

Swiss Time House, Muttom Bazaar Road, Kayamkulam and

the workmen of the above referred establishment

Sri Sivadasan, Choolaparambil, Krishnapuram Village,

Krishnapuram P. O., Kayamkulam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Sri Sivadasan, Watch

Repairer from Swiss Time House, Kayamkulam is

justiable ?

2.

If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(12)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1712/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager and

Inspector of N. S. S. Schools, Perunna P. O.,

Changanassery-686 102 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment Sri K. Venugopala Menon,

29th NOV. 2011]

KERALA GAZETTE

195

‘Leela Nivas’, Karumathil Arts College P. O.,

Kozhikode-673 018 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

termination

of

service

of

Sri K. Venugopala Menon, Watcher, N. S. S. Higher

Secondary School, Trippunithura by the

management is justiable ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to get?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.