KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2011

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVI

hmeyw 56

}

}

6th December 2011

2011 Unkw-_¿ 6

15th Agrahayana 1933

1933 A{K-lmb\w 15

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

48

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1644/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1.

The Manager,

Krishnagiri/Ramagiri Estate, Appapara P. O., Thirunelli,

Mananthavady, Wayanad. 2.

Sri B. Muthu, Proprietor,

Krishnagiri Estate, Appapara P. O., Thirunelli,

Mananthavady, Wayanad. 3.

Sri B. Raju, Proprietor,

Ramagiri Estate, Appapara P. O., Thirunelli, Mananthavady,

Wayanad and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri P. K. Kunhimoideen,

General Secretary, Malabar Estate Workers Union,

Reg. No. 103662, INTUC, Geetha Stores, Kalpetta,

Wayanad-673 577 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is nec-

essary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of work to 1. Smt. P. K. Santha,

2. Smt. Leela Bhaskaran, 3. Smt. Nabeesa Rafeeque,

4. Smt. Kumari, 5. Smt. Rajamma Subhrahmanian,

6. Smt. Ragini Viswanathan, 7. Smt. Meenakshi Jogi,

8. Smt. Santha Rajan, 9. Smt. Bhanu Suresh,

10. Smt. Kavery, 11. Smt. Vella, 12. Smt. Meenashi,

13. Smt. Rukhiya, 14. Smt. Devu Chandran by the

management of Krishnagiri/Ramagiri Estate of

Thirunelly Panchayath is justifiable ? 2. If not, what

are the relief the above workers are entitled for ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1710/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Chenthamara s/o.

Velayudhan, Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam P. O.,

Pattanchery, Chittoor Taluk and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Pankajakshan s/o. Raman, Mele

Veedu Kalam, Karikulam, Vilayodi P. O., Chittoor Taluk in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Pankajakshan

s/o. Raman by Sri Chenthamara s/o Velayudhan,

Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam, Licensee, Chittoor

Excise Range Group 4 is justifiable ? If not, what relief

he is entitled to?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1713/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Chenthamara

s/o. Velayudhan, Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam P. O.,

Pattanchery, Chittoor Taluk and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Muralidharan s/o. Kunjappan,

Mithunam, Pallathampulli, Thathamangalam P. O., Chittoor

Taluk in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Muralidharan,

s/o Kunjappan by Sri Chenthamara, Licensee,

Group 4, T. S. No. 9, Chittoor Excise Range is justi-

fiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1715/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Direc-

tor, M/s. Chackosons Chemicals Private Limited,

Mulankunnathukavu P. O., Thrissur-680 581 and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri M. K. Vidyasagaran s/o Kunjakkan, Madakkavil House,

Gramala, Mulankunnathukavu P. O., Thrissur-680 581 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby di-

rect that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudi-

cation

to

the

Industrial

Tribunal,

Palakkad.

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period

of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether

the

dismissal

of

employee

Sri M. K. Vidyasagaran by the Management of

M/s. Chackosons Chemicals Private Limited,

Mulankunnathukavu is justifiable?

2. If not, what all benefit, Sri M. K. Vidyasagaran is

entitled to get?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1716/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The President,

Kulappully Service Co-operative Bank Limited,

Shornur P. O., Palakkad-679 122, 2. The Secretary,

Kulappully Service Co-operative Bank Limited,

Shornur P. O., Palakkad-679 122 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri P. Krishnaprasad,

s/o Raghavan, Palakkal House, Kulappully, Shornur-2,

Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of the employee, Sri P. Krishnaprasad,

Peon from the service of the Kulappully Service

Co-operative Bank Limited, Shornur with effect from

20-5-2010 by the Management is justifiable ? If not,

what relief he is entitled to?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1717/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an in-

dustrial dispute exists between Sri V. J. Thankachan,

Vennayappillil Veedu, Nadavayal P. O., Wayanad and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri A. S. Padmanabhan, Alumoolayil, Nadvayal P. O.,

Wayanad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is nec-

essary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby di-

rect that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudi-

cation to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri A. S. Padmanabhan, Alumoolayil, Nadvayal P. O.

Wayanad by the employer is justifiable?

2. If not, what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1720/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

Thrissur District Co-operative Bank Limited, Head Office,

Sahakarana Sadabthi Mandiram, Thrissur-680 022 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. V. I. Nalini, d/o V. S. Mohanan, Palanchery House,

Kurichikkara P. O., Thanikudam, Thrissur-680 028 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period

of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the termination of service of Smt. V. I. Nalini,

Part Time Sweeper on daily wages by the employer

i.e. Thrissur District Co-operative Bank Limited,

Thrissur is justifiable?

2. If not, what all remedies she is entitled ?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1721/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala Feeds Limited, Kallettumkara, Thrissur and the

workman of the above referred establishment represented

by the President, Kerala Feeds Workers Union,

Kallettumkara, Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And Whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudica-

tion;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred

for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period

of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is any anomaly in fixation of pay as per

LTS dated 9-4-2008 in respect of Sri Fazaludeen, B. S.,

Technician of Kerala Feeds Limited, Kallettumkara as

alleged by the Union? If so, what reliefs he is

entitled to?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1722/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial

dispute exists between Sri Santhosh Babu Mundayil,

s/o Appu, Managing Director, Popular Books and

Stationery, City Mall Building, Payyannur-670 307 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri V. T. Anirudhan, s/o N. V. Kunjiraman, N.V.K. House,

Korom Amsam Desam, Korom P. O., via Payyannur-670 307

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adju-

dication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri V. T. Anirudhan,

Salesman, with effect from 21-1-2010 by the manage-

ment of M/s. Popular Books and Stationery,

Payyannur is justifiable? If not, what relief the

worker is entitled to?

(10)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1723/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing Direc-

tor, Aspinwall and Company Limited, Pullencode Estate,

Pullencode P. O., Malappuram, 2. The Manager, Aspinwall

and Company Limited, Pullencode Estate, Pullencode P.

O. Malappuram and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Estate Staff

and Employees Union of South India, Thekkungal Build-

ings, Collectorate P.O., Kottayam-2 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is nec-

essary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adju-

dication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Indus-

trial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1. The action of the management of Aspinwall and Com-

pany Limited, Pullamgode Estate in giving promotion

to staff cadre from 1-7-2010 in contravention of the

UPASI norms is justifiable?

2. If not, what is the remedy?

(11)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1724/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager,

M. J. Woods, Nalloomadu P. O., Dwaraka, Edavaka,

Mananthavady and the workman of the above referred es-

tablishment Sri P. M. Kunjumon (Anthonichan),

Puthanpurakkal, Nalloornadu P. O., Pulikkad, Near to

Yuvadhara Library, Edavaka, Mananthavady in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And Whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri P. M. Kunjumon, Worker by the management

of M. J. Woods, Nalloomadu P. O., Dwaraka,

Mananthavady is justifiable?

2. If not, what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.