KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2011

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVI

hmeyw 56

}

}

13th December 2011

2011 Unkw-_¿ 13

22nd Agrahayana 1933

1933 A{K-lmb\w 22

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

49

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1630/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Hotel Indraprastha, English Church Road, Palakkad and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri T. K. Vijayan s/o Kunjan, T. K. Nivas, Chemprakulam,

Kottayi, Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri T. K. Vijayan, Cook,

Hotel Indraprastha management is justifiable ?

If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1631/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. Shri Harish Khaithan,

Managing Director, Andaman Timber Industries (Limited),

Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road, 7th Floor,

Kolkatha, 2. Sri Rajeswaran Nair, Chief General Manager,

Andaman Timber Industries (Limited), Acharya Jagadish

Chandra Bose Road, Kolkatha and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the Secretary,

Andaman Timber Workers Union (CITU), Kunduchira

Road, Eranjoli P. O., Thalassery in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment and wages to the

workers of Andaman Timber Industries Limited,

Chonadem, Eranholy P. O., Thalassery by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what relief they

are entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1645/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Akamala

Sree Dharma Sastha Kshethra Trust, Akamala P. O.,

Kumaranelloor-680 590 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Kerala Kshethra Karmik Sangh, Patturaikkal,

Thrissur-680 022 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Sri C. Velayudhan,

employee of Akamala Sree Dharma Sastha Trust

by the management is justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1647/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Secretary, Kerala

State Electricity Board, Vydyuthi Bhavan, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram, 2. The Assistant Engineer, K.S.E.B.

Electrical Section, Muttungal and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Sivakumar s/o Balan,

Kooteri Kuni Paramb, Cherode East P. O., Vadakara

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Sivakumar,

Contract Worker by the Secretary, Kerala State

Electricity Board is justifiable ? If not, what relief

he is entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1648/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Chenthamara,

s/o Velayudhan, Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam P. O.,

Pattanchery, Chittoor Taluk and the workmen of the above

referred

establishment

Sri

M.

Mukundan

s/o Madhavan, Maruthadikulam, Koomankad,

Thathamangalam, Chittoor Taluk in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment of Sri M. Mukundan

s/o Madhavan by Sri Chenthamara, Licensee

Group 4, Chittoor Excise Range is justifiable ? If

not what relief he is entitled to ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1711/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Raveendran,

s/o Chamayi, Mayan House, Kulathumed, Puthunagaram,

Chittoor, Palakkad and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Manoharan, V. V., s/o

Vasudevan, Vilakkanamkode House, Mooppankulam,

P

a

t

t

a

n

c

h

e

r

y

P.O.-678 532 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

W h e t h e r t h e d en i a l o f e m p l o y m e n t o f

Sri Manoharan, V. V., s/o Vasudevan, by

Sri Raveendran, Licensee, T. S. No. 6, Chittoor

Excise Range, Ambattupalayam is justifiable ?

If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1714/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President,

Uma Maheswara Temple, Narampady, Mouvvar P. O.,

Kasaragod and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Malabar

Devaswam Employees Union, CITU Kumbala Area

Committee, P. O. Kasaragod District in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dinial of employment to Sri Nataraja,

Clerk by the management of Uma Maheswara

Temple, Narampady is justifiable ? If not, what

relief he is entitled to ?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1718/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri P. R. Rafeeq,

s/o P. V. Razaq, Panikkassery Veedu, Ollukkara P. O.,

Thrissur and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Thrissur

District Motor & Engineering Mazdoor Sangh (BMS),

Shornur Road, Patturaikkal, Thrissur-680 022 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri C. S. Mohandas, Driver of Panikkassery Bus

Service by the employer Sri P. R. Rafeeq is

justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1719/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Manager,

Plantation Corporation of Kerala Limited, Perambra Estate,

Muthukad P. O., Kozhikode, 2. The Managing Director,

Plantation Corporation of Kerala Limited, Kottayam and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri K. J. Jose, PF 561, Field Worker, Division B,

Plantation Corporation of Kerala Limited, Perambra Estate,

Muthukad P. O., Kozhikode in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri K. J. Jose, Field

Worker, Perambra Estate, B Division of Kerala

Plantation Corporation Limited, Muthukad,

Kozhikode by the management is justifiable ?

If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.