KERALA GAZETTE
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
©
Government of Kerala
tIcf k¿°m¿
2011
Reg. No. cPn. \º¿
KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011
No.
\º¿
Vol. LVI
hmeyw 56
}
}
20th December 2011
2011 Unkw-_¿ 20
29th Agrahayana 1933
1933 A{K-lmb\w 29
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ
50
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1646/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri C. K. Chakochan,
Proprietor, Jeecel Autospares & Electricals, Main Road,
Chavakkad, Thrissur and the workman of the above
referred establishment Sri C. I. Joseph (Sunny), Cherur
House, Pavaratty P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three
months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to Sri C. I. Joseph
(Sunny), Salesman by Sri C. K. Chakochan,
Proprietor, Jeecel Autospares & Electricals,
Chavakkad is justifiable ?
2. If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1693/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri Saravanan, A.,
Regional Head, Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management
Company Limited, Radhika, Opposite to Axis Bank, Rajaji
Road, Kochi-682 035 and the workman of the above
referred establishment Sri K. Mahadevan, TC 40/872,
Sreevaraham East, Manacaud P. O., Thiruvananthapuram,
Pin-695 009 in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether
the
termination
of
service
of
Sri K. Mahadevan by the management is
justifiable ?
2. If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to?
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1694/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,
Kancor Ingredients Limited, Kanakkankadavu Road,
Angamaly South-683 573 and the workman of the above
referred establishment Sri James Thomas, Nambi Madom
House, Meykkad P.O., Chembannur, Ernakulam represented
by the General Secretary, Kancor Flavours Workers
Union (INTUC), Angamaly South, Ernakulam,
Pin-683 573 in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Sri James Thomas, Charge
man from the service by the management of
M/s. Kancor Ingredients Limited, Angamaly is legal
and justifiable ?
2. If not, what relief he is entitled to get?
(4)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1695/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri Santhosh Kumar,
Manager, G. D. S. Security Service, Global Detective
Security Service, Opposite to Army Officers Enclave,
Pangode, Thirumala P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-6 and the
workman of the above referred establishment represented
by Adv. G. Vijayakumar, Secretary, Kollam Jilla Security
Employees Union, Ashtamudi Law Chambers, Thevally,
Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure
to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for
adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour
Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to Sri Asokan
by the management G. D. S. Security Service is
justifiable or not?
2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to get?
(5)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1696/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Managing Director, Kerala
State Co-operative Rubber Marketing Federation Limited,
PB No. 15, Gandhi Nagar, Kochi-682 020 and the workmen
of the above referred establishment represented by the
General Secretary, Kerala State Crumb Rubber Factories
Staff Association, INTUC (I), Chenappady P. O.,
Kanjirappally, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned
in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to the permanent
staff of the Chenappady Crumb Rubber Factory,
Smt.Vijayamma Chandra Mohan, Smt.Leela Kumari, S.,
Sri Abraham N. T., Sri Nissar, P. P., Sri Sebastian, K. J.,
Sri Sebastian, A. K. due to the lockout of the
factory is justifiable or not?
2. If not what relief they are entitled to?
(6)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1697/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Vettinad
Ksheerolpathaka Co-operative Society Ltd. No. T. 220(D),
APCOS, Vettinad, Vattappara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-28
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri K. Kuttappan Pillai, Lakshmi Bhavan, Vettinad,
Vattappara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Sri K. Kuttappan Pillai,
Milk Tester from the Service of Vettinad
Ksheerolpathaka Co-operative Society Ltd. No. T.
220(D), APCOS, Vettinad, Vattappara P. O. by the
management is justifiable ?
2. If not what are the reliefs he is entitled to?
(7)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1728/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 14th November 2011.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Partner,
Hotel Windsor Castle, Kodimatha, Kottayam and the
workmen of the above referred establishment
represented by the Secretary, Kottayam Jilla Shop & Other
Establisment Mazdoor Sangh, BMS Office, T. B. Junction,
M. L. Road, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned
in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three
months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal from service of 1. Regi, T.
(Bill Captain), 2. Sri Cheriyan, M. K. (House
Keeping), 3. Sri Aneesh, A. (Gardener),
4. Sri Ajeesh, P. S. (House Keeping), 5. Sri Sajeev, D.
(Security) and 6. Sri Roy, T. (Project Worker),
Workers of Hotel Windsor Castle, Kodimatha,
Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?
2. If not, what reliefs the workmen entitled to?
By order of the Governor,
R. SASI KUMAR,
Under Secretary to Government.
KERALA GAZETTE
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
©
Government of Kerala
tIcf k¿°m¿
2011
Reg. No. cPn. \º¿
KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011
No.
\º¿
Vol. LVI
hmeyw 56
}
}
20th December 2011
2011 Unkw-_¿ 20
29th Agrahayana 1933
1933 A{K-lmb\w 29
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ
50
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No.1740/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 15th November 2011.
Read:—1.
G. O. (Rt.) No. 175/2011/LBR dated 1-2-2011.
2.
Lr. No. I D 8/2011 dated 7-3-2011 from the
Presiding Officer (in-charge), Labour Court,
Kozhikode.
3.
Lr. No. I (1) 9358/2011 dated 3-9-2011 from the
Labour Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram.
In the circumstances reported in the letter read as
2nd and 3rd papers above, Government are pleased to
order that the Industrial dispute referred for adjudication to
the Labour Court, Kozhikode vide Government Order read
above is transferred to the Labour Court, Kannur.
2.
The Government Order read above stands
modified to the above extent.
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No.1752/2011/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th November 2011.
Read:—1.
G. O. (Rt.) No. 102/2011/LBR dated 19-1-
2011.
2.
Lr. No. I D 7/2011 dated 7-3-2011 from
the
Presiding Officer (in-charge), Labour
Court,
Kozhikode.
3.
Lr. No. I (1) 9358/2011 dated 3-9-2011
from the
Labour Commissioner,
Thiruvananthapuram.
In the circumstances reported in the letter read as
2nd and 3rd papers above, Government are pleased to
order that the Industrial dispute referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kozhikode vide Government Order
read above is transferred to the Labour Court, Kannur.
2.
The Government Order read
above stands modified to the above
extent.
By order of the Governor,
L. GEETHA,
Deputy Secretary to Government.