KERALA GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

17th January 2012

2012 P\p-hcn 17

27th Pousha 1933

1933 s]ujw 27

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

3

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDER

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1861/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 20th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President, Kundara

Ksheera Vyavasaya Co-operative Society Limited No. Q 88,

Kundara P. O., Kollam-691 501 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri J. Pradeep Kumar,

Rosh Bhavan, Nanthirakkal, Vellimon P. O., Perinad,

Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri J. Pradeep Kumar (Driver) by the management,

i.e., President, Kundara Ksheera Vyavasaya

Co-operative Society Limited No. Q 88 is justifiable

or not? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to

get?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

ORDER

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1880/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager,

M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri M. P. Subhash,

Mundekudiyil Veedu, Ayirapuram P. O., Keezhillam-683 551

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the alleged denial of employment to

Sri M. P. Subhash by the management of

M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam is justifiable or

not?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RACHEL VARGHESE,

Under Secretary to Government.

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1881/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited (CMRL), Edayar and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri M. N. Jayaraman, Pishari Kovil Variam, Eroor West,

Thrippunithura in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is any denial of employment to

Sri M. N. Jayaraman, Pooja Assistant, Cochin

Minerals and Rutile Limited, Edayar, Aluva by the

management ?

If so, what are the reliefs the

workman is entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1882/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri R. Murukan, Chairman,

Mary Matha College of Engineering and Technology,

Paliyode, Dalummukham P. O., Neyyattinkara,

Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri M. I. Ajin Mosses,

Sabu Sadanam, Kuttikkad, Elluvila P. O.-695 504 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri M. I. Ajin Mosses, Library Assistant by the

management is justifiable ?

If not what are the

reliefs he is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1883/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Chairman, Mahatma Gandhi

International Charities (Gandhi Bhavan), Pathanapuram,

Kollam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri S. Raju, Ravi Vilasam Veedu, Padam

P. O., Kalathoor via, Pathanamthitta in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri S. Raju by

the management i.e. Chairman, Mahatma Gandhi

International Charities is justifiable or not? If not,

what relief the worker is entitled to get?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1884/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

M.R.F. Limited, PB No. 2, Vadavathoor, Kottayam and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Thomas Chacko, Malippurath House, Mangottuchira,

Pandangari P. O., Edathua, Alappuzha-689 721 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Sri Thomas Chacko,

Worker, MRF Limited, Vadavathoor, Kottayam by

the management is justifiable?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitiled to?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1899/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager,

M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri C. R. Mohanadasan Nair,

Chennattu Veedu, Ayirapuram P. O. in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the alleged denial of employment to

Sri C. R. Mohanadasan Nair by the management

of M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam is

justifiable or not?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1925/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Autocast Limited, S.N. Puram P. O., Cherthala-688 582 and

the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the Secretary, Kerala Silk Employees Union

(AITUC), S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala-688 582,

Reg. No. 03-24/1988, Autocast Unit in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of promotion of non ITI Workers

to the post of Supervisor (Assistant Engineer) by

the management of M/s. Autocast Limited,

S. N. Puram, Cherthala is justifiable ? If not, what

relief they are entitled to?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.