KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

31st January 2012

2012 P\p-hcn 31

11th Magha 1933

1933 amLw 11

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

5

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No.1896/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. V. Sathi, Managing

Partner, Hotel Sudarsan, Parameswar Nagar, Kollam-691 004

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the Secretary, Quilon Hotels & Tea Shop

Workers Union (INTUC), Mundakkal, Kollam-691 001 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of employment to Sri Reghu

Raj, Bill Clerk with effect from 4-1-2011 by the

management of Hotel Sudarsan, Kollam? If yes,

what reliefs the workman is entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1897/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Kerala State

Electricity Board, Vaidhyuthi Bhavan, Pattom,

Thiruvananthapuram-4 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by 1. The President,

KSEB Petty Contractors and Casual Line Workers Union,

Reg. No. 01-02/2008, Hindu Mission, Press Club Road,

Statue, Thiruvananthapuram, 2. The General Secretary,

Kerala Power Workers Unity Centre (NTUI), Reg.

No. 02-03/2002, Saivihar, TC 26/1837, GPO Lane, Statue,

Thiruvananthapuram-1, 3. The General Secretary, KSEB

Meter Readers Union (MRU), Reg. No. 01-03/2011, Hindu

Mission, Press Club Road, Statue, Thiruvananthapuram,

4. The General Secretary, KSEB Petty Contractors and

Contract Workers Congress (INTUC), V. P. Marakkar

Smaraka Mandiram, Vanchiyoor, Thiruvananthapuram-1, and

5. The General Secretary, Kerala Electricity Contract

Workers Federation (AITUC), W & C Hospital Road,

Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The Industrial Tribunal,

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the demand for payment of Bonus for

the year 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 to the Petty

Contractors and Casual Line Workers and Meter

Readers who are continuously engaged by the

Kerala State Electricity Board is justifiable ?

2. If yes, what relief they are entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1898/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri R. Murukan,

Managing

Partner,

PRS

Hospital,

Killipalam,

Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Kerala Hospital Employees Sangam (BMS),

Reg. No. 91/83,

Mazdoor

Bhavan,

Karamana,

Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court, will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the transfer of Sri Santhosh Kumar,

K. Chandran and Lijukumar to the Sub Centre of

the PRS Hospital at Nagarcoil and Sri Manoj

Kumar to the construction site at Akkulam are

justifiable ? If not, what reliefs they are entitled

to?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1900/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Director, Little Lourde

Mission Hospital, Kidangoor P. O., Kottayam

District-686 572 and the worker of the above

referred establishment Smt. Subhadra Gopalan, Nellukottil

Veedu, Ramapuram P. O., Pala, Kottayam in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Subhadra Gopalan, Dhobi by the management

Little Lourde Mission Hospital, Kidangoor P. O.,

Kottayam is justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1901/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Naresh Narendran,

Proprietor, Narendran Polymers, Kalluvathukal P. O., Kollam

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the President/Secretary, Kollam Jilla General

Workers Union (AITUC), P. R. Smarakam, Chathannoor

P. O. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the Charter of Demands dated 20-12-2010

raised by the Union is reasonable? 2. The

Lockout of the Factory with effect from 7-1-2011

by the management is justifiable ?

3. What are

the reliefs entitled to the workmen ?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1902/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Proprietor, Jeevan

Cashews, Ayathil, II Number Junction, Kallumthazham P. O.,

Kollam and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri. S. Radhakrishnan,

Mullassery Bungalow, General Secretary, All India UTUC

Kashuvandi Thozhilali Centre, Perumbuzha P. O., Kundara,

Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court, will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Smt. Ambili (No. 231),

Smt. Usha (No. 248) and Smt. Kumari (No. 294),

Peeling Workers from service of Jeevan Cashews,

Ayathil, Kollam with effect from 26-7-2010 by the

management is justifiable ?

If not, what are the

reliefs the workers entitled to?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1903/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Shri Akbar Hyder

Mussaliyar, Safayar Cashew Factory, Malika Veedu,

Ashramam, Kollam-4 and the workmen of the

above

referred

establishment

represented

by

1. Sri. R. Bhavanandan, Secretary, Kerala Kashuvandi

Thozhilali Congress (INTUC), Thiruvananthapuram District

Committee, Kallambalam, 2. Sri Satheesan, M.,

Thiruvananthapuram District Kashuvandi Thozhilali Union

(UTUC), Kallambalam, Navayikulam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether Sri Mohanan, R. Devadasan and

Smt. Sobhana, Temporary workers are eligible for

permanency as Staff Workers of M/s. Safayar

Cashew Company, Kallambalam as demanded by

the Unions ? If so, what are the reliefs they are

entitled to?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1907/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Rado Tyres,

Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri. Jose M. Paulose, Manoliyil Veedu,

Thankalam, Kothamangalam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the alleged denial of employment to

Sri Jose M. Paulose by the management of

M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam is justifiable or

not ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1926/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing Director,

First Flight Couriers Limited, 15/16, National House,

Saki Vihar Road, Salcniaka, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400072,

2. The General Manager, Kerala Region, First Flight

Couriers Limited, Regional Head Office, XL 986, T. D. Road,

Kochi-11 and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary,

Ernakulam Shops and Employees Union (CITU), Reg. No.

07/16/89, Maruthi Vilas, C. S. Road, Kochi-682 011 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the Charter of Demands dated 10-9-1997

raised by the Union is justifiable ?

2. Whether the dismissal of six workmen namely,

Sarvasree 1. Rajesh, K. C., 2. Shine C. Jose,

3. Rajeev Kumar, K. S., 4. Nanda Kumar, T. C.,

5. Anil Kumar, K. A. and Saji, D. by the

management is justifiable ?

3. What are the reliefs entitled to workmen?

(10)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1931/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary,

Thiruvananthapuram Sarvodaya Sangham, Ooruttukala,

Neyyattinkara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram and the workman

of the above referred establishment Sri B. Sreekumar,

Thazhathu Veedu, Mulakkal Kizhakkathil, Inchavila P. O.,

Kollam-691 601 (Present Address-Anisree, Naduvilanchery,

Kanjavali P. O., Kollam-691 602) in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri B. Sreekumar from the

service of Thiruvananthapuram Gramodaya

Sangham is justifiable ?

If not, the remedy

sought for ?

(11)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1940/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. Haleema Anwar,

Proprietrix, Neo Agency, Chalai, Thiruvananthapuram and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri C. Surendranath, Indhiralayam, Studio Road,

Estate P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri C. Surendranath, Salesman from the service of

Neo Agency, Chalai, Thiruvananthapuram is

justifiable ?

If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(12)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1941/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Rado Tyres,

Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Suresh, K. A., Konattu Veedu,

Nellikuzhi P. O., Kothamangalam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the alleged denial of employment to

Sri Suresh, K. A. by the management of

M/s. Rado Tyres, Kothamangalam is justifiable or

not ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(13)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1942/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri P. Vasudevan, Proprietor,

Webcot, Asokapuram, Aluva and the workmen of the

above referred establishment by the President, Webcot

Employees Union (CITU), Aluva, K. G. Mandiram, M. O.

Road, Aluva in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the action of the management of Webcot

Aluva

being

transferred

the

workers

Sri S. Bishanji, Indhukumar, C. P. and

Unnikrishnan V. R. from Aluva to Sular amounts

to unfair labour practice ?

2. If yes, what are the relief entitled to them?

(14)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1943/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Rado Tyres,

Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Shiju, O. R., Olikulangara Veedu,

Payipra P. O., Pezhakkappilly, Muvattupuzha in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the alleged denial of employment to

Sri Shiju, O. R. by the management of M/s. Rado

Tyres, Kothamangalam is justifiable or not ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(15)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1944/2011/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th December 2011.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Mahendran Nair, J.,

Managing Director, Ambadi Dairy Products Limited,

Kulakode, Vellanad, Thiruvananthapuram District and the

workmen of the above referred establishment Sri S. Shibu,

Sheeba Bhavan, Gandhi Nagar, Naruvamoodu P. O.,

Thiruvananthapuram

District,

represented

by

Sri Mannaram Ramachandran, Thiruvananthapuram District

Dairy Workers Union (CITU), Deshabhimani Road,

Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment of Sri S. Shibu,

Accountant from the service of Ambadi Dairy

Products Limited, Vellanad is justifiable ?

2. If not, the relief sought for ?

(16)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 06/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Nallathanni

Estate, KDHP Co. Pvt. Ltd., Munnar and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Highrange Estate Supervisors and

Employees Union, Ganesh Bhavan, Pambanar P. O.,

Peermade in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of permanency in employment to

Smt. Roslin, P. F. No. 5614 Nallathanni Estate,

Nadyar South Division by the management is

justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(17)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 7/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Secretary,

Chirakkadavu Service Co-operative Bank Limited No. 2057,

Chirakkadavu P. O., Ponkunnam, Kottayam, 2. The

President, Chirakkadavu Service Co-operative Bank Limited

No. 2057, Chirakkadavu P. O., Ponkunnam, Kottayam and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri M. B. Anilkumar, Anchanattu House, Thekkethu

Kavala P. O., Ponkunnam, Kottayam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Sri M. B. Anilkumar, Peon,

Chirakkadavu Service Co-operative bank Limited

No. 2057, Chirakkadavu P. O., Ponkunnam,

Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(18)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 08/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager, Hotel

Leela Venture Limited, Kovalam P. O., Thiruvananthapuram

and the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by 1. The President, General Employees

Association (INTUC), Kovalam Hotels Limited,

Kovalam P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 527, 2. The General

Secretary, Leela Kovalam Workers Union (AITUC),

Kovalam P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 527, 3. The

Secretary, Kovalam Hotels Employees Union (CITU),

Kovalam P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 527 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the workers of M/s. Leela Venture (Limited),

Kovalam, Thiruvananthapuram are eligible to get

exgratia in excess of bonus as per the Payment of

Bonus Act, 1965 ? If yes, what is the quantum?

(19)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 10/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni

Estate, KDHP Co. Pvt. Ltd., Munnar and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Highrange Estate Supervisors and

Employees Union, Ganesh Bhavan, Pambanar P. O.,

Peermade in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Ramesh Kumar, 5283 of

Nallathanni Estate, Nadyar South Division,

Munnar by the management is justifiable ? If

not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(20)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 18/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri T. M. Anwar, Manager,

T.K.M.L.P. School, Manthuruthi, Kochuvila P. O.,

Peringamala, Nedumangad (T. M. S. House, Tholicodu P. O.)

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. K. Thankamma, Mekkumkara Puthen Veedu,

Manthuruthi, Karimancode P. O., Palode, Nedumangad

represented by Sri K. Krishnamurthy, Working President,

School Sucheekarana Pachaka Thozhilali Union,

Reg. No. 9/5/01, Thiruvananthapuram District Committee,

Uthsava Madom, Kottakkakam P. O., Thiruvananthapuram

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment of

Smt. K. Thankamma, Cook by the Management of

T.K.M.L.P. School, Manthuruthi, Kochuvila P. O.,

Peringamala, Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief she is entitled to?

(21)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 19/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The General Manager,

Hotel Leela Venture Limited, Kovalam, Kovalam P. O.

2. Smt. Ratheedevi, Proprietor, M/s.Gayathri Associates,

Gayathri Nivas, Vellar Junction, Kovalam P. O.,

Thiruvananthapuram-695 527 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Sasidhar, R.,

Thottathuvilakathu Veedu, Anthiyoor, Nellivila,

Balaramapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is any denial of employment

to Sri Sasidhar, Utility worker either by the

Management of M/s. Hotel Leela Venture (Limited),

Kovalam or by the Contractor, Smt. Ratheedevi,

Proprietor, Gayathri Associates ? If yes, what

relief he is entitled to?

(22)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 28/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The President, Pandalam

Rubber Marketing Society Limited No. A-268, Pandalam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Jose Mathew, Nilavarayyathu, Mundumadathil,

Kurampala, Pandalam P. O., in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal from service of Sri Jose Mathew,

Nilavarayyathu, Mundumadathil, Kurampala,

Pandalam P. O., Worker w. e. f. 21-7-2008 by the

Management of Pandalam Rubber Marketing

Society Limited No. A-268, Pandalam is justifiable

or not ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled

to get?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.