Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour  and  Rehabilitation  (A)

ORDERs

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 30/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between Sri M. A. Habeeb,

Managing Partner, Silverstream Plastics and Chemicals

Limited, Ponjassery, Ernakulam and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the Secretary,

Silvertsream Plastics and Chemicals Employees Union

(SPCEU), Ponjassery P.O., Ernakulam-683 547 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

Part  I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

7th  February  2012

 2012 s^{_phcn 7

18th Magha 1933

1933 amLw 18

Thiruvananthapuram, Tues-

day

6

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn  {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

24

Kerala  Gazette

[Part I

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.  The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

Annexure

    1. Whether the Charter of Demands dated 15-5-2010

submitted by the Union regarding wage revision

etc. of the Employees of Silverstream Plastics and

Chemicals Limited is justifiable?

    2. Whether the lock out with effect from 30-10-2010

and closure with effect from 1-12-2010 by the

management during the discussion before the

District Labour Officer is justifiable ?  

    3. Whether any unfair labour practices have been

committed by the management against union

workers?

    4.  What are the relief the workers are entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 34/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between 1. The Director,

Tyford Tea Limited, Penta Tower, 6th Floor, Kaloor,

Kochi,  2.  The Senior Manager, Tyford Estate, Fairfield

P.O., Ealappara, Idukki District and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the Regional

Secretary, Estate Staff Union of South India, Peermade in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act

of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government

hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred

for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki,

Peermade.  The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award

within a period of three months. 

Annexure

    Whether the change in conditions of service of Sri

Sanalkumar, Pharmacist by the management of

Tyford Estate is justifiable ?  2. If not, what

relief the worker is entitled to get?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 35/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni

Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Workers Congress, Munnar P. O.,

Idukki-685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act

of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government

hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred

for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki,

Peermade.  The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award

within a period of three months.

Annexure

    Whether Smt. Mallika, Temporary Worker of Kallar

Factory Division, Nallathanni Estate is eligible

to get permanency in the Estate? 2. If yes, what

relief she is entitled to?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 36/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between 1.  The Managing

Director, M.M.J. Plantations, Manarkadu Buildings, Pala,

Kottayam, 2. The Manager, M.M.J. Plantations, Kottamala

Estate, Kottamala P. O., Peermade, Idukki District and the

workman of the above referred establishment Sri Rajan,

Check Roll No. 1270, I Division, Kottamala, Vagamon,

Idukki-685 503 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period

of three months. 

Annexure

 

 

1.  Whether the denial of employment to

Shri Rajan, CR. No. 1270, Kottamala Estate,

Vagamon by the management of the Estate is

justifiable ?  2. If not what reliefs the workman

is entitled to ?

25

Kerala  Gazette

[Part I

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 37/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between (1) The Secretary,

Marthoma Medical Mission, Marthoma Sabha Office,

Thiruvalla-689 101, (2) The Administrator, Fellowship

Mission Hospital, Kumbanad, Pathanamthitta-689 547

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by (1)  The General Secretary, Pathanamthitta

District Private Hospital Employees Union (CITU),

Pathanamthitta, (2) Sri A. T. Thomas, Secretary,

Pathanamthitta District Private Hospital Employees Union

(CITU), Fellowship Mission Hospital Unit, Kumbanad,

Pathanamthitta-689 547 in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha.  The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months. 

Annexure

 

  Whether the decision of the management of

Fellowship Mission Hospital, Kumbanad to

effect changes in the existing service condition

including leave with wages, age of retirement/

Superannuation of employees in the establishment

is justifiable? 

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 41/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Najeem Mussaliyar,

Proprietor, Najeem Cashew Industries, Onambalam

(2) 

Sri

N.

Nandakumar,

Managing

Partner,

Sastha

Enterprises,

Onambalam,

H.O.

No.

XXV/2000,

Ayathil

P.

O.,

Kollam-691 021 and the worker of the above referred

establishment Smt. Leela, Raju Mandiram, Koduvila P.

O., East Kallada, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam.  The Labour

Court, will pass the award within a period of three months. 

Annexure

 

  Whether the denial of termination from service to

Smt. Leela, Worker on the ground of her disability

by the management of Sastha Enterprises,

Onambalam is justifiable? If not what relief she

is entitled to?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 43/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Publisher, Madhyamam

Daily, Silver Hills, Kozhikode-673 012 and the workman

of the above referred establishment Sri A. M. Ahmed

Shah, Ahammediya Manzil, Naranganam North P. O.,

Pathanamthitta District in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.  The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months. 

Annexure

Whether

 the 

termination 

of

service 

of

Sri A. M. Ahmed Shah, Reporter/Sub Editor with

effect from 1-9-2010 by the management of

Madhyamam Daily, Kozhikode is justifiable ?  If

not what relief the worker is entitled to get?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 75/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Autokast Limited, Cherthala and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Construction Workers Union (CITu), Autokast

Union, Reg. No. 1-3/2001, S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

26

Kerala  Gazette

[Part I

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha.  The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months. 

Annexure

Whether the demand for permanency of five contract

workers namely, Sri Muraleedharan Nair, C.,

Sri Krishnakumar, G., Sri Bhagavat Singh, P.,

Sri Anirudhan, S. and Sri Vijayakumar, N. in

M/s. Autokast Limited, Cherthala is justifiable? 

If not, for what relief they are entitled to?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 78/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The President, PTA,

Government Model Higher Secondary School for Girls,

Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram, 2.  The Headmistress,

Government Model Higher Secondary School for Girls,

Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Motor and Engineers

Mazdoor Sangham, Fort, Thiruvananthapuram in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam.  The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three

months. 

Annexure

Whether the demands for enhancements of

wages, other service benefits and denial of

employment to the bus drivers, 1. K. Kripas,

2. P. Thankappan Nair, 3. R. Gopinathan Nair,

4. C. Sreekandan Nair and the bus conductors,

1. Sajeev Kumar, 2. S. Devarajan, 3. S. Soman,

4. K. Thankappan Asari are justifiable or not? If

not what are the reliefs entitled to?

By order of the Governor,