KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

21st February 2012

2012 s^{_p-hcn 21

2nd Phalguna 1933

1933 ^m¬Kp\w 2

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

8

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 15/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. Sri Abdul Jaleel,

Pulimoottil Veedu, Kilikollur Village, Kilikollur, Kollam,

2. Smt. Subailath, W/o Abdul Jaleel, Jazeena Manzil,

TKMC (P. O.), Karikkode, Kollam and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Arunachalam

S/o Pakkeer Chettiyar, SRK Theruvu, Chenkotta in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether Sri Arunachalam, Cleaner, Lorry bearing

Reg. No. KL-7 N 2057 is entitled to service

benefits consequent on the sale of the vehicle

from his employee Sri Abdul Jaleel ? 2. If so,

what is the quantum of such benefits?

(2)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 16/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President, Uliyakovil

Service Co-operative Bank Limited No. Q-1003, Uliyakovil,

Kollam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri K. G. Arun, A. R. Gardens, Uliyakovil,

Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri K. G. Arun, Internal

Auditor, Uliyakovil Service Co-operative Bank

Limited No. Q-1003, Uliyakovil, Kollam by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what are the

relief the worker is entitled to?

(3)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 17/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. Anilkumar,

Proprietor, Thundil House, Kovoor, Arinellur P. O., Kollam

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Quilon District Motor

and Mechanical Workers Union (CITU), CITU Bhavan,

Kollam-13 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Achuthan Pillai,

Permanent Conductor by the Management,

namely, V. Anilkumar, Proprietor of (KL 2 L 5142)

Stage Carriage is justifiable or not ? If not, what

relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(4)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 29/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Jose Kallookkaran,

Distributor, Jyothi Bharath Gas Agencies, Near Church,

Marathakkara, Thrissur and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the District Convener,

All Kerala Gas Agency Thozhilali Union (CITU), Thrissur

District Committee, Machingal Lane, Thrissur in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether there is denial of employment to S/Sri

1. Shibu George, 2. Nijeesh, 3. Saju Joseph,

4. N. O. Thomas, 5. Shaju by Sri Jose Kallookkaran,

Distributor, Jyothi Bharath Gas Agencies, Near

Church, Marathakkara, Thrissur ? 2. If yes, what all

reliefs these persons are entitled to get from the

management ?

(5)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 31/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Southern Refineries Limited, Kuzhinjanvila, Parassala P.O.,

Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Shabu, K., Seenath Manzil, Filgiri,

Cherukkalam P.O., Anchal, Kollam respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri Shabu, K.,

Plant Operator from the service of Southern

Refineries Limited is justifiable ? If not, what are

the reliefs he is entitled to?

(6)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 32/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

MRF Ltd., P.B. No. 2, Vadavathoor, Kottayam and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by 1. MRF Employees Association (INTUC), Vadavathoor,

Kottayam, 2. MRF Employees Union (CITU), Vadavathoor,

Kottayam, 3. MRF Employees Sangh (BMS), Vadavathoor,

Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the declaration of lay off by the

management of MRF Ltd., Vadavathoor, Kottayam

from 7-10-2011 to 10-10-2011 is legal ? 2. If not,

what reliefs, the above workers are entitled to?

(7)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 33/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Rado Tyres,

Kothamangalam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri N. K. Haris, Nadukudiyil Veedu,

Nellikuzhy P.O., Kothamangalam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the alleged denial of employment to

Sri N. K. Haris by the Management of M/s. Rado

Tyres, Kothamangalam is justifiable or not ?

2.

If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(8)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 38/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

Chennai Silks, 40/65704, M. G. Road, Ernakulam-682 035 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri A. V. Karunakaran, Nangethu Veedu, Amballur,

Ernakulam District in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the shift timing from 6 a.m. to 4 p.m.

allotted to Sri A.V. Karunakaran is justifiable or

not ? If yes, what is the remedy ?

(9)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 42/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The President, Ittiva

Grama Panchayat, Vayyanam P.O., Ayoor via, 2. The

Secretary, Ittiva Grama Panchayat, Vayyanam P.O., Ayoor

via. and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by Sri T. V. Salahudeen, General Secretary,

South Kerala Public and Private Establishments Works

Congress, INTUC, Manjappara P.O.-691 553 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Smt. Swarnamma, Part Time Casual Sweeper by the

management, i.e. the President/Secretary, Ittiva

Grama Panchayat is justifiable or not ? If not what

relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(10)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 44/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1. The Managing

Director (For the Board of Directors), Kerala State

Co-Operative Federation for Fisheries Development

Limited, Kesavadasapuram, Thiruvananthapuram,

2. Sri Abdul Kalam, Branch Manager, Matsyafed Ice &

Freezing Plant, Kochangadi, Kochi-682 002 and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by the General Secretary, General Workers Union (AITUC),

X/871, Manthri Road, Veli, Kochi-1 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt K.S. Suganthi, Temporary Worker of the

Matsya Fed Ice & Freezing Plant, Kochi by the

management is Justifiable ? 2. If not what are the

reliefs she is entitled to ?

(11)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 70/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Perambra

Estate, Muthukad P.O., Perambra, Kozhikode and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri T. K. Vijayan, Thayullathil House, Muthukad P.O.,

Peruvannamuzhi, Perambra-673 528 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri. T. K. Vijayan, worker by

the management of Perambra Estate, Muthukad,

Perambra, Kozhikode is Justifiable? If not what

relief he is entitled to ?

(12)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 71/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri. Jomon Jose, Madani

House, Kallur P.O., Thrissur and the workmen of the

above referred establishment Sri George, K.V.,

Kuzhikandathil House, Muttithadi P.O., Bharatha, Thrissur,

represented by the Secretary, Cherukida Rubber Tapping

Thozhilali Association, H.O. Alengad, Muttithadi

P.O.-680 317 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether there is denial of employment to

Sri. K.V. George, Rubber Tapper by the employer,

Sri. Jomon Jose, Madani House, Kallur P.O.,

Thrissur ? 2.

If so what relief he is entitled to

get ?

(13)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 72/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri. George (Vakkachan),

Kochuvanikunnel, Parambai, Killannur, Thrissur and the

workmen of the above referred establishment

Sri K.P. Paulose, Kondiyarathu House, Chottupara P. O.,

Killannur, Thrissur, represented by the President, All Kerala

Rubber Tappers Association, Reg. No. 8-2-O.F. 2010, State

Committee, H.O. Thrissur, Kurichikara P.O., Thanikudam,

Thrissur-680 028 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether there is denial of employment to

Sri K.P. Paulose, Rubber Tapper by the Estate

Owner, Sri George, Kochuvanikunnel, Parambai,

Killannur, Thrissur ? 2. Whether the demand for

enhanced wages is Justifiable ? 3. If yes, what

relief he is entitled to ?

(14)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 73/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri A. Ubaidulla,

Proprietor, Rabeena Medicals, Jubilee Road, Perinthalmanna

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by Sri. P. Mahesh, Pallyal Thodi Veedu,

Pattambi Road, Perinthalmanna P.O. (President, Private

Pharmacists Association, Malappuram District Committee)

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Jameela, V.

Pharmacist by the Proprietor of Rabeena Medicals,

Perinthalmanna is Justifiable ? 2. If not, what is

the remedy ?

(15)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 74/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Director, Jan

Shikshan Sansthan, 17/1070, Taluk Office Road, Puthiyara,

Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri K. Muneer, S/o. M. M. Pokkar,

Parambathu Veettil, Perumanna, Kozhikode District in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Muneer,

Driver, Jan Shikshan Sansthan, Kozhikode by the

management is Justifiable ? If not, what reliefs

he is entitled to get ?

By

order

of

the

Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.