KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

28th February 2012

2012 s^{_p-hcn 28

9th Phalguna 1933

1933 ^m¬Kp\w 9

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

9

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 76/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri N. Chandrasekharan Nair,

Licensee,

Toddy

Shop

No. 45,

Muttappally,

Mukkoottuthara P. O., Erumeli, Kottayam and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Mundakayam Madya Vyavasaya

Thozhilali Union, AITUC, Mundakayam, Kottayam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Sri K. J. Jose, Salesman,

Toddy Shop No. 45, Muttappally, Mukkoottuthara

P. O., Erumeli, Kottayam by the management is

justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 77/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan,

Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Pradeepkumar, Chettikunnel House, Meenadam P. O.,

Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

the workman Sri Pradeepkumar by the

Employer, Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha,

Kottayam is justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 79/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan,

Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Renjith, Amala Bhavan, Arumanoor P. O., Kottayam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

the workman Sri Renjith by the Employer,

Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is

justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 80/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan,

Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri M. S. Rajesh, Mulavanakunnel, Meenadam P. O.,

Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

the workman Sri M. S. Rajesh by the Employer,

Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is

justifiable ?

2.

If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 81/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan,

Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri K. S. Prasad, Kannattuprambil House, Kurichi P. O.,

Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

the workman Sri K. S. Prasad by the Employer,

Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is

justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 82/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan,

Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Jijimon, Punnamoottil House, Vakathanam P. O.,

Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

the workman Sri Jijimon by the Employer,

Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is

justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 83/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri V. N. Thulaseedharan,

Employer, Rahul Nivas, Moolavattom P. O., Kottayam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Anoop, Manikkattu House, S. H. Mount P. O.,

Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

the workman Sri Anoop by the Employer,

Japan Automobiles, Kodimatha, Kottayam is

justifiable ?

2.

If not what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 100/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between 1.

The Headmaster,

Government L. P. School, Thalanadu, Kottayam, 2.

The

President, PTA Committee, Government L. P. School,

Thalanadu, Kottayam and the worker of the above referred

establishment Smt. Aswathi Thankachan, Kunnumpurathu,

Thalanadu, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki, Peermade.

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Aswathy Thankachan, Cook, Government

L. P. School, Thalanadu, Kottayam by the

management is justifiable ?

2.

If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.