KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

6th March 2012

2012 am¿®v 6

16th Phalguna 1933

1933 ^m¬Kp\w 16

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

10

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 114/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 21st January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Sony Mathew,

Proprietor, Speed & Safe Courier Service, Pathanamthitta

and the worker of the above referred establishment

Smt. Aswathy Kumari, K. C. , Deepak Bhavan, Malayalappuzha,

Eram P. O., Pathanamthitta in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Aswathy Kumari with effect from 1-1-2011 by

the mangement of Speed and Safe Courier Service,

Pathanamthitta is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 115/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 21st January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

D.C. Press (P) Ltd., D.C. Kizhakemuri Idam, G. S.

Street, Kottayam and the workmen of the above referred

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

establishment represented by the Secretary, D.C.

Press Workers Union (T.U.C.I.), T.U.C.I. District Committee

Office, Koumudi Buildings, Opposite PWD Office, T. B.

Road, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki.

The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the retrenchment of Sri Tijomon, P.T.,

Printer, D.C. Press (P) Ltd., Kottayam by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 141/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 24th January 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing Director,

Bata India Limited, Bata House, 418/022, ‘The Ascent’,

Opp. MDI Mehrauli Road, Sector 17, Gurgaon, (2) The

Manager- Personnel & Administration, Bata India Limited,

Retail South Cahin, 83, Industrial II Suburb,Yeshwanthapur,

Bangalore-560 022, (3) The District Manager, Bata India

Limited, Statue Junction, M. G. Road, Thiruvananthapuram

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by All India Bata Shop Employees Union, 1,

Chakkaraberia Road (South), Bhowanipur, Kolkatha-700 025

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the transfer of three workmen namely

Sri (1) P. J. Stephen, (2) Nischel Christy, (3) Philip

George by the Management is justifiable ?

2.

What are the reliefs entitled to workmen ?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 210/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

MRF Ltd., Vadavathoor, Kottayam-686 010 and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by (1) The Secretary, MRF Employees Association

(INTUC), Vadavathoor, Kottayam, (2) The Secretary, MRF

Employees Union (CITU), Vadavathoor, Kottayam, (3)

The Secretary, MRF Employees Sangh (BMS),

Vadavathoor, Kottayam, (4) The General Secretary, MRF

Contract Workers Union (CITU), Vadavathoor, Kottayam

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the lay off on 18-6-2011 to 21-6-2011 and

lock out on 22-6-2011 and 23-6-2011 at MRF,

Kottayam is legal or not ?

2.

If illegal, what the relief the permanent and

contract workers of MRF, Kottayam entitled to ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 211/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Dairy Manager, Milma,

Kollam Dairy, Thevally, Kollam and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri J. Prasad, Rabek, College

Road, Pulaman P.O., Kottarakkara in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Sri. J. Prasad

(Lab Technician), Milma Dairy, Kollam by the

management is justifiable ?

2.

If not, what are the relief the worker is

entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 212/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Muhamma

Clam Marketing Processing and General Marketing

Co-operative Society Ltd. No. A-1078, Muhamma P. O.,

Alappuzha-683 526 and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri K. P.Bahuleyan

(Secretary), Head Load & General Workers Union

(INTUC), Muhamma Unit, Muhamma in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment of workers viz.

Smt. Sukumary, Smt. Sushama, Smt. Leelamony &

Smt. Gunasundari by the Management of

Muhamma Clam Marketing Processing and General

Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd. No. A-1078

is justifiable ? If not, what relief they are

entitled to ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 220/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 9th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri A. K. Manoj, Agent,

VRL Logistic Ltd., Lorry Parcel Office, Thalikkavu Road,

Kannur, Kadan House, Chandrashekhara Theru, P. O.

Koothuparamb-670 643 (2) The Administrative Manager,

VRL Logistic Ltd., Giriraj Annexe, Circuit House Road,

Hoobli-580 029 and workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri M. Bhaskaran,

s/o Kumaran, Shreyas, Near Krishna Apartment, Keecheri

P.O., Pappinessery in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri M. Bhaskaran, Clerk, either by the management

of M/s VRL Logistics Ltd. or by Sri K. Manoj,

Agency of VRL Logistics Ltd. is justifiable ?

If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 221/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 9th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary,

Kannur Co-operative Milk Supply Society Ltd., No. F.1400,

South Bazar, Kannur-2 and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri M. N. Shaji, s/o Mani, M. N.

House, Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri. M. N. Shaji, Salesman by the management of

Kannur Co-operative Milk Supply Society Ltd. is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the worker

is entitled to ?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 222/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 9th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri P. A. Jose, Chairman,

Josco Jewellery, G. B. Road, Palakkad and workman of the

above referred establishment Sri K. M. Rajeev,

s/o Madhavan, Kalimadaparambil Veedu, Thirunellayi,

Kannadi Post, Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. M. Rajeev,

worker, Josco Jewellers, G. B. Road, Palakkad is

justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

A. JUMAILA BEEVI,

Under Secretary to Government.