KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

20th March 2012

2012 am¿®v 20

30th Phalguna 1933

1933 ^m¬Kp\w 30

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

12

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 178/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the President,

Thiruvambadi Devaswom, Thiruvambadi P. O., Alappuzha-2,

(2) the Secretary, Thiruvambadi Devaswom, Thiruvambadi

P. O., Alappuzha-2, (3) the Treasurer, Thiruvambadi

Devaswom, Thiruvambadi P. O., Alappuzha-2 (4) the

Patron, Thiruvambadi Devaswom, Thiruvambadi P. O.,

Alappuzha-2 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri V. Gopalakrishnan, Sreeviswam,

Velimbarambil, Thiruvambadi Ward, Alappuzha-2 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri V. Gopalakrishnan in Thiruvambadi

Sreekrishnan Swami Temple under Thiruvambadi

Devaswom is justifiable ? If not, what is the relief

he is entitled to ?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 179/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Anilkumar Sukumaran,

Jyothis Frozel Foods, Usha Bhavan, Kottaram Nagar,

Kacheri Division, Kollam-13 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri P. Ajith Kumar, Lakshmi

Nandanam, Njharakkal, Perinad P. O., Kollam respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri P. Ajith Kumar,

Driver by the management of Jyothis Frozel

Foods, Kollam is justifiable ? If not, what relief he

is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

R. SASIKUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 217/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 9th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Kerala State

Beverages Corporation, S. H. Mount P. O., Kottayam and

workman of the above referred establishment represented

by Sri Thomas Kalladan, Vice President, Kerala State

Beverages Corporation Workers Congress (INTUC),

INTUC District Committee Office, Kodimatha, Kottayam

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki.

The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri P. O. Thomas,

worker from 17-2-2008 by the management of

Kerala State Beverages Corporation is justifiable ?

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 256/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary,

Koothattukulam Co-operative Hospital Ltd. No. E-303,

Koothattukulam P. O., Ernakulam District and workman

of the above referred establishment Smt. Lilly Issac,

W/o V. A. Varkey, Vazhakkalayil, Mutholappuram P. O.,

Ilanji, Ernakulam in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Smt. Lily Issac by the

management of Koothattukulam Co-opereative

Hospital, Koothattukulam is justifiable ?

2. If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 257/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala Books and Publications Society, Kakkanad P. O.,

Ernakulam, Kochi-682 030 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, K. B. P. S. Employees Federation (AITUC),

Reg. No. 209/84, Kakkanad P. O., Kochi-682 030 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Lobour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the direct recruitment in the post of Offset

Printing Machine Assistant by the management

of KBPS is justifiable, while there is an approved

Promotion policy in force ? If not, what the relief

entitled to the workers ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 260/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th February 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

M/s Spectrum Soft Tech Solutions (P) Ltd., Spectrum IT

Park, Mahakavi G. Road, Kochi-682 011 and the

workman of the above referred establishment Sri

Mazhoodul Rehuman, S/o A. Muhammed Kunhu, Manam

Padinjattekkara, Thevalakkara P. O., Karunagappally,

Kollam District in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the dismissal of Sri Mazhoodul Rehuman,

Software Engineer by the management of

M/s Spectrum Soft Tech Solutions (P) Ltd.,

Mahakavi G. Road, Kochi is justifiable ?

2. If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

A. JUMAILA BEEVI,

Under Secretary to Government.