KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

7th August 2012

2012 BKÃv 7

16th Sravana 1934

1934 {imhWw 16

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

32

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 858/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th June 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing

Director, Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation, Head

Office, Maveli Bhavan, Gandhi Nagar, Kochi (2) the

Regional Manager, Regional Office, Mayor Building,

Jail Road, Puthiyara P. O., Kozhikode-673 004 (3) the

Depot Manager, Civil Supplies Corporation, Taluk Depot,

Mubarak Road, Koyilandy, Kozhikode and the workman of

the above referred establishment Sri A. V. Radhakrishnan,

S/o Late P. Unni Nair, Sisiram, Kuniyil, Moodadi P. O.,

Koyilandy, Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri A. V. Radhakrishnan, daily wage worker, Sisiram,

(Kuniyil), Moodadi, Koyilandy by the management is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 889/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 13th June 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri. M. L. Joy, Mangalan

Textiles, Aloor, Kallettumkara P. O., Thrissur-680 683 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri T. P. Antony, Thoduparambil House, Vallakkunnu,

Kallettumkara, Thrissur-680 683 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

ii

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri T. P. Antony

by the management of Mangalan Textiles, Aloor, is

justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 890/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 13th June 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri N. K. Baiju,

Sreekrishna International Hotel, Vatakara P. O.,

Kozhikode-673 101 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the President,

General Workers Union (INTUC), Vatakara Taluk

Committee, Vatakara P. O., Kozhikode-673 101, (C/o Anjali

Travels, Vatakara P. O.) in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri. T. Balan,

Thayyullathil (HO), Puthoor P. O. by the employer

Sri. Baiju, Sreekrishna International Hotel, Vatakara is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 898/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 14th June 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Dr. K. K. Mohandas,

Managing Partner and Medical Superintendent, Elite

Mission Hospital, Thrissur and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the Secretary, United

Nurses Association, Elite Mission Hospital Unit, Elite

Mission Hospital, Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the Shit timing proposed by the management

of Elite Mission Hospital Unit, Thrissur is justifiable ?

If not, what is the remedy ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 958/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th June 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the (1) Managing

Director, Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank, R. 689,

Puranattukara (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the worker

of the above referred establishment Smt. Manjula Rajan,

w/o (Late) P. R. Rajan, Parambuveettil House,

Puranattukara P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

(1) Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Manjula Rajan, w/o (Late) P. R. Rajan,

Parambuveettil House, Puranattukara P. O.,

Thrissur by the management of Adat Farmers

Service Co-operative Bank, R. 689, Puranattukara

is justifiable ?

(2) If not, what other relief she is entitled to get ?

iii

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 959/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th June 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing

Director, Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara, (2) The Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the worker

of the above referred establishment Smt. Ajitha w/o

Thilakan, Kolangaraparambil House, Chittilappilly in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

(1) Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Ajitha

w/o Thilakan, Kolangaraparambil House,

Chittilappilly by the management of Adat Farmers

Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689, Puranattukara

is justifiable ?

(2) If not, what other relief she is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

A. JUMAILA BEEVI,

Under Secretary to Government.

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1010/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri M. Aboobacker,

Marikkasseri House, Thanur P. O.-676 302, Malappuram

District and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the President, Motor and

Engineering workers Union (CITU), Thirur P. O.-676 101,

Malappuram District in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment of

Sri P. Ganapathy, Driver in Bus No. KL-10 N. 1380

by Sri M. Aboobacker, registered owner of the Bus

without observing Section 25 (f) of the Industrial

Disputes Act is justifiable ? If not, what relief he

is entitled to?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1011/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Kakkarayil

Radhakrishnan, Proprietor, Jeyarji Book House and

Jewellery, Puthiyatheru, Pothan Building, Chirakkal P. O.,

Kannur and the workman of the above referred

establishment

Sri

Cherukata

Janardhanan,

Sathyanandapuram, Near Panankav, Puthusseri School,

Chirakkal P. O., Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment to

Sri Cherukata Janardhanan by the management of

Jeyarji Book House and Jewellery with effect from

2-11-2011 is justifiable ? If not, what are relief the

worker is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1012/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, the

Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd., Rajapuram Estate,

Rajapuram P. O., Kasaragod and the worker of the above

referred

establishment

Smt.

N.

K.

Prasanna,

Chempakasseri, Panathoor P. O., Via. Rajapuram,

Kasaragod District in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

iv

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Smt. N. K. Prasanna, Field

Worker from the service of Rajapuram Estate by

the management is justifiable ? If not, what

relief she is entitled to?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1013/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager,

Commonwealth Tile Factor, Feroke, Kozhikode and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by the Secretary, City Tile Workers Union (INTUC),

Cherootti Road, Kozhikode in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kozhikode. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to the workers

who were present on Hartal Day (19-9-2011) and

thereby denying wages etc. to such workers by

the management of Commonwealth Tile Factor,

Feroke, Kozhikode is justifiable ? If not, what

relief they are entitled to?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1014/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala State Co-operative Hospital Complex and Centre for

Advanced Medical Services Ltd. No. 4386, Pariyaram,

Kannur and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Pariyaram

Medical College Staff Association (PMSA) INTUC,

Pariyaram P. O., Kannur-670 503 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether Sri P. Pavithran who has been working as

Pharmacy Assistant on monthly consolidated pay

basis is eligible to get permanency of employment

on pay scale basis or not ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1015/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the (1) Managing

Director, Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara, (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the workman

of the above referred establishment Sri C. K. Santhosh

S/o Krishnan, Chanayil House, Chittilappilly P. O.,

Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

(1) Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri C. K. Santhosh s/o Krishnan, Chanayil House,

Chittilappilly P. O., Thrissur by the management of

Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara is justifiable ?

(2) If not, what other relief he is entitled to get ?

v

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1016/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between the (1) Managing

Director, Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the worker

of the above referred establishment Smt. Radha

w/o Vijayan, Kandaningad House, Muthuvara P. O.,

Puzhakkal in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

(1) Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Radha w/o Vijayan, Kandaningad House,

Muthuvara P. O., Puzhakkal by the management

of Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara is justifiable?

(2) If not, what other relief she is entitled to get?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1017/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between the (1) Managing

Director, Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the workman

of the above referred establishment Sri K. V. Ramadas

s/o Velu, Kuriyakkot House, Puranattukara P. O., Thrissur

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

(1) Whether the denial of employment to

Sri K. V. Ramadas s/o Velu, Kuriyakkot House,

Puranattukara P. O., Thrissur by the management

of Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara is justifiable?

(2) If not, what other relief he is entitled to get?

By order of the Governor,

S. REHNA BEGUM,

Deputy Secretary.