KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/12/12-14

No.

\º¿

Vol. LVII

hmeyw 57

}

}

14th August 2012

2012 BKÃv 14

23rd Sravana 1934

1934 {imhWw 23

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

33

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1018/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689,

Puranattukara, (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the worker of

the above referred establishment Smt. Ajitha

w/o Madhusoodhanan, Edathara House, Adat P. O. in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Indutrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Ajitha w/o Madhusoodhnan, Edathara House,

Adat P. O., by the management of Adat Farmers

Service Co-operative Bank-R. 689, Puranattukara is

justifiable.?

2.

If not, what other relief she is entitled to get?

ii

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1019/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R.689,

Puranattukara (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the workman

of the above referred establishment Sri K. C. Manojkumar

s/o Chandrasekharan, Karumaparambil House, Muthuvara,

Puzhakkal P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri. K. C. Manojkumar s/o Chandrasekharan,

Karumaparambil House, Muthuvara, Puzhakkal

P.O., Thrissur by the Management of Adat

Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R-689,

Puranattukara is justifiable?

2.

If not, what other relief he is entitled to get?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1020/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R.689,

Puranattukara (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the worker of

the above referred establishment Smt. Rekha w/o Saji,

Poothoparambil House, Puzhakkal P. O., Muthuvara,

Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Rekha w/o Saji, Poothoparambil House,

Puzhakkal P. O., Muthuvara, Thrissur by the

Management

of

Adat

Farmers

Service

Co-operative Bank-R.-689, Puranattukara is

justifiable?

2.

If not, what other relief she is entitled to get?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1037/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Sujankumar, K. P.,

Sthapathi Engineers & Designers, Thiruvambadi,

Kozhikode-673 603 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Balakrishnan, C. K. (Mani), Nellikkode

House, Kallurutti P. O., Thiruvambadi (via.), Kozhikode-673

603 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri Balakrishnan, C. K. (Mani), Nellikkode House,

Kallurutti P. O., Thiruvambadi by the employer of

Sthapathi Engineers & Designers is justifiable? If

not, what relief he is entitled to?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1038/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

Kannur District, Co-operative Bank, Head Office, P. B. No.

35, Kannur-1 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri C. Narayanan, Sayoojyam, Machery,

Mouvanchery P. O., Kannur-670 613 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

iii

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri C. Narayanan, Night Watchman, by the

management of Kannur District Co-operative Bank,

with effect from 9-3-2012 is justifiable? If not, what

relief he is entitled to?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1039/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Kannur

Medical College, Anjarakandy, Kannur and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

Secretary, Cannanore District, Private Hospital & Medical

Shop Employees Union (CITU), Kannur-1 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Kumari Nimisha Vijayan, Pharmacy Assistant by

the management of Kannur Medical College,

Anjarakandy is justifiable or not? If not, what

relief the worker is entitled to?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1040/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing

Director, Adat Farmers Service Co-operative Bank-R.689,

Puranattukara (2) the Administrator, Assistant Registrar

(General), Co-operative Society, Thrissur and the worker of

the above referred establishment Smt. Sudha

w/o Balachandran, Kulambrath House, Amalanagar P. O.,

Choorakkattukara in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Sudha w/o Balachandran, Kulambrath House,

Amalanagar P. O., Choorakkattukara by the

management

of

Adat

Farmers

Service

Co-operative Bank-R. 689, Puranattukara is

justifiable?

2.

If not, what other relief she is entitled to get?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1041/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Senior Manager, Tata

Coffee Ltd., Malakkappara Estate, Pariyaram P. O.,

Chalakudy (via), Thrissur and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri K. Paneer, P. F. No. 4580, West

Division, Malakkappara Estate, Pariyaram P. O., Thrissur-

680 721 represented by Sri. Jose Chalissery (INTUC), C/o

K. V. K. Panicker Office, Southern Shopping Complex,

Veliyannur P. O., Thrissur-680 021 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

iv

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment in the post of

Supervisor/Watchman to Sri K. Paneer, Estate

Worker, consequent of his accident during the

course of employment by the management of Tata

Coffee Ltd., Malakkappara Estate, Pariyaram P. O.,

Chalakudy, Thrissur is justifiable ?

2. If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1085/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 13th July 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Rashtra Deepika, Kottayam and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Jacob Thomas, Cheruvannur

Estate, Valiyode P. O. (Chepra), Kottarakkara, Kollam, Pin-

691 520 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Jacob Thomas, Business Executive by the

management of M/s Rashtra Deepika Ltd. is

justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to?

By order of the Governor,

S. REHNA BEGUM,

Deputy Secretary to Government.