KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

No.

\º¿

Vol. I

hmeyw 1

}

}

18th September 2012

2012 sk]v‰w-_¿ 18

27th Bhadra 1934

1934 `m{Zw 27

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

15

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N) /12/12-14

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 1190/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

Pullikkanam Estate, Cochin Malabar Estates and Industries

Ltd., Pullikkanam P. O., Vagamon (Via), Idukki District,

Pin-685 503 and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the President, High Range

Plantation Employees Union (INTUC), Peermade,

Pin-685 531 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of 1519 Sivaraman,

employee of Pullikkanam Estate owned by Cochin

Malabar

Estates

and

Industries

Ltd.,

Pullikkanam P. O., Vagamon by the management of

the Estate is justifiable.?

2.

If not, what reliefs the workman are entitled to ?

(2)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1192/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Packeting

Centre, Pallivasal, Munnar P. O., 685 612 and the

ii

workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Workers Congress,

Munnar P. O., 685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the dismissal of Smt. Sugumary,

P. F. 5639 Packeting Centre, Pallivasal is justifiable?

2.

If not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1193/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri N. P. Varghese,

Niravath, Kuthukuzhi P. O., Kothamangalam and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri M. T. Baby, Mannartharayil Veed, Nellimattomkara,

Kothamangalam in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment of

Sri M. T. Baby, Conductor from 2-1-2011 onwards

by the employer Sri N. P. Varghese, Registered

owner of Stage Carriage No. KL-7 AK-2237,

is justifiable?

2.

If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1205/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between M/s Mica Sales

Corporation, Asialiai Trust Building, T. D. Road, (Southern End),

Ernakulam-682 011 and the workman of the above referred

establishment

Sri

Sreekanth

G.

Pai,

S/o A. V. Gopalakrishna Pai, Tachappally Parambil House,

Kuthappady Road, Thammanam P. O., Ernakulam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri Sreekanth G. Pai by the management of

M/s Mica Sales Corporation is justifiable?

2.

If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1256/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 14th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Home

Nursing Service Society, Nagambadam, Kottayam and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. Meera Soman, Mathathil Veedu, Kooroppada P. O.,

Kottayam-686 533 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

iii

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Meera Soman, Pharmacist, Homoeopathy

Super Speciality Hospital, Kottayam by the

management is justifiable?

2.

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1282/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

T. T. K. Health Care Ltd., Heart Valve Division, Kinfra

Apparel Park, St. Xaviours College P. O., Thumba,

Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri K. Sureshkumar, Prabhakara

Vilasam

Veedu,

Kunnanad,

Puzhanad

P.

O.,

Ottasekharamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram-695 125 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri Sureshkumar from

the service of T. T. K. Health Care Ltd.,

Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable? If not, what

are the reliefs he is entitled to?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1283/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Company (Private Ltd.),

Sree Gokulam Towers, No. 66, Arkot Road, Chennai-24, (2)

the Branch Manager, Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance (Private

Ltd.), Bishop Jerome Nagar, Kollam and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Vanijya Vyavasaya Masdoor Sangh, Masdoor

Bhavan,

Thamarakulam,

Kollam-691 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri S. Vinod (No. 1381)

Collection Assistant from service of Sree Gokulam

Chits & Finance (Private Ltd.), Bishop Jerome

Nagar,

Kollam

with

effect

from

3-11-2010 by the management is justifiable? If

not, what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to?

By order of the Governor,

T. R. SOMASUNDARAN,

Under Secretary to Government.