KERALA GAZETTE
tIcf Kkddv
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv
©
Government of Kerala
tIcf k¿°m¿
2012
No.
\º¿
Vol. I
hmeyw 1
}
}
2nd October 2012
2012 HIvtSm-_¿ 2
10th Aswina 1934
1934 Bizn\w 10
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆
17
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073
dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. cPn. \º¿
KL/TV(N) /12/12-14
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1231/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 9th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing
Director, Civil Supplies Corporation, Maveli Bhavan,
Kochi, (2) The Regional Manager, Kerala State Civil
Supplies Corporation, Regional Office, Mayon Building,
Puthiyara P. O., Jail Road, Kozhikode, (3) The Assistant
Manager, Civil Supplies Corporation, Taluk Depot,
Vatakara, I. D. Road, Vatakara and the workman of the
above referred establishment Sri Sunil Mohan, Supplyco
Workers
Federation
(AITUC),
Thampanoor,
Thiruvananthapuam-695 001 in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial
Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the
Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute
be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court,
Kozhikode.
The Labour Court will pass the award
within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether there is denial of employment to
Sri M. M. Manoj, daily wage worker of Maveli
Store, Vatakara by the management of
Supplyco?
If yes, what are the reliefs he is
entitled to ?
(2)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1232/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 9th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
Kannur Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. No. F-1278,
P. B. No. 2005, Chova P. O., Kannur and the
workmen of the above referred establishment
represented by the Secretary, Kannur District Textile
Labour Union (AITUC), Kannur Co-operative Spinning
Mills, Kannur-6 in respect of matters mentioned in
the annexure to this order ;
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
ii
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kannur.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1.
Whether the appointment in the post of Spinning
Fitter to an Assistant Fitter on promotion in the
Convincing Department by the management of
Cannanore Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd.
Kannur is justifiable ?
2.
If not, what is the remedy ?
(3)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1233/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 9th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Director, Child Line,
‘Samagra’, Kalmandapam Bypass Road, Palakkad-7 and
the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri Shaji Joseph, Kalathil House, Kottampara Village,
Kanjikode West P. O., Palakkad in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal
will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the dismissal of Sri Shaji Joseph, from
Child Line is legal or not ?
2. If not, what reliefs he is entitled to ?
(4)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1255/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 14th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Smt. Asuma Beevi,
Managing Trustee, Ramlath Memorial Charitable Trust,
Regi. No. 2988/92, A. J. Central School, Puthukurichi,
Thiruvananthapuram and the worker of the above referred
establishment Smt. Rukheela Beevi, d/o Ramla Beevi, Flat
No. K. P. 11/830, A. J. Apartment, Kazhakoottam P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram District in the annexure to this
order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of Smt. Rukheela Beevi from
the service of A. J. Central School, under the
Ramlath Memorial Charitable Trust, Puthukurichi,
Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ?
If not, what
relief he is entitled to get ?
(5)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1258/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 14th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Mary
Matha College of Engineering and Technology, Paliyode,
Dalummukham, Neyyattinkara and the workman of the
above referred establishment Sri C. Thankamany,
Chenkittavila, Mottalummood, Mannamkonam P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in
the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Sri C. Thankamany from the service of Mary
Matha College of Engineering and Tehnology
is justifiable ?
If not, what relief he is entitled
to ?
(6)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1286/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Executive Director,
Muthoot Health Care Division, Mar Gregorios Memorial,
Muthoot Medical Centre, College Road, Kozhencherry
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri Sasikumar, T. K., Thuruthiyil Veedu, Punnakkad P. O.
Kozhencherry, Pin-689 652 in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
iii
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of employment of
Sri T. K. Sasikumar, Front Office Manager, by the
management of MGM Muthoot Medical Centre,
Kozhenchery is justifiable ? If not what relief
he is entitled to ?
(7)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1287/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Smt. B. Sathi, Managing
Partner, Hotel Sudarsan, Parameswar Nagar,
Kollam-691 001 and the workman of the above referred
establishment represented by Sri G. Jayaprakash, General
Secretary, Quilon Shops & Establishment Employees
Union (INTUC) Mundakkal, Kollam in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Sri G. Padmakumar, Bill Clerk, with effect from
7-9-2011 by the management of Hotel Sudarsan,
Parameswara Nagar, Kollam is justifiable or
not?
If yes, what relief he is entitled to?
(8)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1288/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
M/s Southern Investment Private Ltd., First floor, Empress
Next, Kathyakadavu, Kalavoor P. O., Ernakulam
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri John, P. P., Parakattukudiyil Veedu, Cethikkodu P. O.,
Pin-682 315 in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Sri John, P. P.,
by the management of M/s Southern Investment
(P) Ltd., is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is
entitled to ?
(9)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1300/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
Securi Trans India (Private) Limited, Akshay,
T. C.18/808(9), Akshaya Tower, Opp. St. Mary’s Central
School, Aramada P. O., Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri H. R. Rajeshkumar, Lekshmi Bhavan, Kunnappuzha,
Koorachal, Aramada, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of Sri H. R. Rajeshkumar
from the service of Securi Trans India (Private)
Limited, by its management is justifiable?
If not, what are the relief he is entitled to ?
(10)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1318/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri N. P. V a r g h e s e ,
Niravath, Kuthukuzhi P. O., Kothamangalam and the
workman of the above referred establishment
Sri N. V. Paulose, Nellamkuzhy Veedu, Thalakottu Karayil,
Kothamangalam in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order ;
iv
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
W h e t h e r t h e d e m a n d o f e m p l o y m e n t o f
Sri N. V. Paulose, Driver from 1-6-2011 onwards by
Sri N. P. Varghese the employer of Stage Carriage
KL-17B-8797 is justifiable ? If not, what are the
reliefs he is entitled to ?
(11)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1338/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 27th August 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Pambanar
Estate, Poabs Enterprises Limited, Pambanar P. O.-685 531
and the workmen of the above referred establishment
represented by the Secretary, Kerala Plantation Workers
Union (INTUC), Peermade-685 531 in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three
months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the worker CR No. 1499 Yesu, Supervisor,
Pambanar Estate, Briton Division managed by
Poabs Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. is eligible to be
superannuated from service with effect from
1-8-2011 as per the superannuation notice issued
by the management or eligible to be continued in
service upto 31-7-2012 as claimed by the union
representing the workman?
2. If not, what reliefs the workman is entitled to?
(12)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 1378/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th September 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Aspinwall
and Company, Pullancode Division Pullangode Estate,
Pullangode P. O., Via. Kalikavu, Malappuram-676 525 and
the workmen of the above referred establishment
represented by the General Secretary, the Estate Staffs’
Union of South India. Kerala Zonai Office,10/270, Sonia
Villas, South Chittoor, Ernakulam-682 027 in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.
The
Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three
months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the transfer of Sri C. P. Sunil, Assistant
Field Officer from Pullangode Estate to Coir
Division of Aspinwall & Company Ltd. by the
management is justifiable? If not, what is the
remedy?
By order of the Governor,
T. R. SOMASUNDARAN,
Under Secretary to Government.