KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

No.

\º¿

Vol. I

hmeyw 1

}

}

9th October 2012

2012 HIvtSm-_¿ 9

17th Aswina 1934

1934 Bizn\w 17

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

18

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N) /12/12-14

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1290/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager (IR),

KANCOR Ingredients Ltd. Angamally South, Ernakulam

and the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the Secretary, KANCOR Employees Union

(CITU), Angamally South in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand of CITU Union of Kancor

Limited, Angamally to correct the age of

Sri T. S. Mohanan, Roll No. 50 is justifiable or not ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1317/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Terumo Penpol, Puliyarakonam P.O., Thiruvananthapuram

and the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by (1) the Secretary, Terumo Penpol

Employees Congress (INTUC), Puliyarakonam P.O.,

Thiruvananthapuram (2) the Secretary, Terumo Penpol

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

ii

Employees Association (CITU), District Committee

Office, Chirakulam Road, Thiruvananthapuram (3) the

General Secretary, Terumo Penpol Employees Sangh,

Puliyarakonam, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the non-sanctioning of eligible leave to 27

workers of Terumo Penpol, Puliyarakonam,

Thiruvananthapuram on 14-10-2011 by its

management is justifiable ? If not what are the

relief entitled to them ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1339/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 27th August 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

D.C. Mills Pvt. Ltd., Valavanadu, Kalavoor P. O., Alappuzha

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri N. R. Sreenivasan, Nikarthil Kolothu, Kalavoor P. O.,

Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment to

Sri N.R. Sreenivasan in M/s. D.C. Mills,

Valavanadu is justifiable ? If not what is the relief

he is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1382/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. T. Bhanumathi,

Kannoth House, Mundalloor P. O., Peralassery and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri P.C. Rayis, Palliyath House, Mundalloor P.O.,

Peralassery in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri. P.C. Rayis,

with effect from 15-1-2012 by the management of a

Hill Produce Shop owned by Smt. T. Bhanumathi,

is justifiable ? If not, what relief the worker is

entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1383/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th Septemper 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Brindavan

Estate, Mambatta, Pookoottupadam P. O., Nilamboor,

Malappuram - 679 332 and the workman of the above

referred establishment represented by the President,

INTUC,

Amarambalam

Mandalam

Committee,

Indira Bhavan, Pookottupadam P.O., Nilamboor,

Malappuram-679 332 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Subramaniyan, A.K., Rubber Tapper by the

Management, Brindavan Estate, Mampatta is

justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

iii

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1384/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Abdurahiman Haji,

Thodimmal House, Irimbiliyam P. O., Valanchery (via.),

Velikkulam and the workmen of the above referred

establishment Sri Ubaid P. S/o Kunhappa, C/o Amina

Kakkidiyil, NIT (P.O.), Kozhikode-673 601 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Ubaid, by

the management, Sri Abdurahiman Haji, T.,

Irimbiliyam (P. O.) is justifiable? If not, what is

the remedy?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1385/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary,

M/s Cannanore Sarvodaya Sangh, Chettamkunn Road,

Thalassery and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary,

Cannanore Sarvodaya Sangham Workers Union (INTUC),

INTUC Office, Fort Road, Kannur in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is any anomalies in the Fixation of

Scale of Pay as per minimum Wages Notification

No. G.O. (Rt.) 5/2010/LBR dated 8-1-2010 to the

employees of M/s Cannanore Sarvodaya Sangh,

Thalassery? If so what are the reliefs they are

entitled to?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1386/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Rev. Dn. Pradeep George,

Director, CSI Mission Hospital, Kodakkal (P.O.),

Thirunavaya, Tirur-676 108 and the worker of the above

referred establishment Smt. Moli Varghese, Karat House,

Kodakkal (P.O.), Tirur in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kzhikode. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Moli Varghese by the management is

justifiable? If not, what is the remedy?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1395/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 6th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Sri K. N. Venugopalan

S/o Nandakumar, Kannamchedath Veedu, Cheruvaloor P. O.,

Valoor-680 321 and the workmen of the above referred

establishment Sri Satheesh Babu, Cheriyil Veedu,

Cheruvaloor P. O. represented by the Secretary, Thrissur

District Motor & Engineering, Masdoor Sangh (BMS),

Thiruvambadi, Vivekananda Road, Thrissur-680 001 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribural, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

iv

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Satheesh Babu,

Conductor by the management of Nandanam Bus

is justifiable? If not, what other relief he is entitled

to get?

(10)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1406/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Proprietor,

Sreenarayana Printing & Publishing House, Temple Gate,

Thalassery and the worker of the above referred

establishment represented by Smt. K. Chandrika,

Kallarakandi House, Nettoor P. O., Thalassery in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. K. Chandrika by the management of

Sreenarayana Printing & Publishing House,

Thalassery is justifiable? If not what relief the

worker is entitled to?

(11)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1407/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Sulaiman, Managing

Director, Hi-Lite Project & Constructions, Eranhipalam,

Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri K. Dharmesh (Dharmu), Neelambari,

Kalassery Parambil (P. O.), Kozhikode in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri K. Dharmesh (Dharmu), Neelambari, Kalassery

Parambil (P. O.), Kozhikode by the employer,

Hi-Lite Project and Constructions, Eranhipalam,

Kozhikode is Justifiable or not? If not, what relief

he is entitled to?

(12)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1408/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

KEXCON, T.C.-14/024, Rosecot Lane, Vazhuthacaud,

Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Ashokan, A. M., Hridul Bhavan,

Ariyalloor (P. O.), Vallikkunnu, Malappuram District-676 312

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri

Ashokan, A. M., Security Guard, Air Cargo,

Calicut, by the management is justifiable? If not,

what is the remedy?

(13)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1410/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Chief Executive,

Eastern Rugmills, J.R. House, P. B. No. 60, CCSB Road,

Civil Station Ward, Alappuzha-1 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Chandramohan, R.,

Kannampallil, Karthikappally P. O., Alappuzha-690 516 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial

Tribunal pass will the award within a period of three months.

v

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of benefits consequent on

termination of employment to Sri Chandramohan, R.,

in Eastern Rugmills by the management is

justifiable ? If not what relief he is entitled to ?

(14)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1443/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

M/s Prima Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Prima House, South

Kalamassery-682 033 (2) the Managing Director, M/s PAPL

EXIM INDIA Ltd., 4/758 South Kalamassery-682 033 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. Elsy Devassy, W/o Devassy, Kollamparambil,

Kolakkad Colony, Erumathala P.O., Keezhmadu, Aluva in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

Dismissal

from

service

of

Smt. Elsy Devassy by the managements of Prima

Beverages Ltd. & PAPL EXIM INDIA Ltd. is

Justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(15)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1444/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

M/s Prima Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Prima House, South

Kalamassery-682 033 (2) the Managing Director, M/s

PAPL EXIM INDIA Ltd., 4/758, South Kalamassery-

682 033 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Smt. Bushra Salim, W/o Salim, Kaipalathil

House, Near MES Junction, Erumathala P.O., Aluva-683 105

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

dismissal

from

service

of

Smt. Bushra Salim by the managements of Prima

Beverages Ltd. & PAPL EXIM INDIA Ltd. is

Justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(16)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1445/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Deputy General

Manager, H.R.J. Refrigeration, Convent Junction, Market

Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-11 and the workman of the above

referred establishment represented by Sri K. P. Vijayakumar,

Secretary, Kerala Samsthana Motor Thozhilali Union (TUCI),

H.R.J. Unit, Maruthi Vilas, Room No. 14, CS Road,

Ernakulam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri V. A. Ullas,

driver by the management of M/s H.R.J.

Refrigeration, Kannadikkadu ? If yes, what is the

remedy ?

vi

(17)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1446/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President, Thekkemuri

Ksheerolpadaka Co-operative Society Ltd. No. A-137 (D)

APCOS, Kannimel, Vallikunnam P. O., Alappuzha and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri K. V. Abhilash Kumar, Kochu Veetil, Kannimel,

Vallikunnam P. O., Alappuzha in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri K.V. Abhilash Kumar

(Milk collector) from the service of Thekkemuri

Ksheerolpadaka Co-operative Society Ltd.

No. A-137 (D) APCOS, Kannimel, Vallikunnam P.O.,

690 501 is Justifiable ? If not what relief he is

entitled to ?

(18)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1447/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

M. Squared Software & Services, M. Squared

Building, Techno Park Campus, Karyavattom P. O.,

Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the above

referred establishment Sri D. T. Pramod, D.T. Cottage,

Kaivanvila, Amaravila P. O., Pin-695 122 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri D. T. Pramod, Driver

from the service of M. Squared Software &

Services, Techno Park, Thiruvananthapuram by

the management is Justifiable ? If not, what are

the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(19)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1448/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri V. K. Kunjaria,

Licensee, T.S. No. 49, Kidangara, Valamparambil, Kannadi,

Pulinkkunnu P. O., (2) Sri T. D. Gireesh, Thayyil House,

Kannadi, Pulinkkunnu P. O. and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the Secretary,

Kuttanad Taluk Madya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union (CITU),

Reg. No. 03-8/90, Mankombu, Thekkekara P.O., Alappuzha-

688 503 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment to

Sri K. A. Satheesan in T.S. No. 49, Kidangara,

Kuttanad Range by the management is justifiable ?

If not what is the relief he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

T. R. SOMASUNDARAN,

Under Secretary to Government.