KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

No.

\º¿

Vol. I

hmeyw 1

}

}

23rd October 2012

2012 HIvtSm-_¿ 23

1st Karthika 1934

1934 Im¿ØnIw 1

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

20

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N) /12/12-14

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1516/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing Director,

Harrisons Malayalam Ltd., Bristo Road, Wellington Island,

Kochi-682 003, (2) The Manager, Harrisons Malayalam Ltd.,

Moongalar Estate, Moongalar P. O., Vandiperiyar, Idukki

District and the workman of the above referred

establishment respresented by The Secretary, Peermade

Thottam Thozhilali Union (CITU), P. R. Centre, Vandiperiyar

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

ii

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is dismissal of Smt. Santhi, Worker,

C. R. No. 4204, No. I Division, Moongalar Estate,

Vandiperiyar by the management of Harrisons

Malayalam Ltd. is justifiable ?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1533/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Partner,

Unity Drug House, Thalassery and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri N. C. Sasidharan s/o

Bhaskaran, Namath House, Kuttimakkuul P. O., Thiruvangad

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri N. C. Sasidharan, Salesman with effect from

10-6-2012 by the management of Unity Drug

House, Thalassery is justifiable ? If not, what

relief the worker is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1534/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Ajithkumar, K. M.,

S. S. Industries, Thokkialangadi, Koothuparamba P. O.

and the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by The Secretary, Kannur District Vanijya

Vyavasaya Masdoor Sangh (BMS), Kannur District

Committee, Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri V. Aneesh,

Welder by the management of S. S. Industries,

Thokkilangadi, Koothuparamba with effect from

30-1-2012 is justifiable ? If not what relief the

worker is entitled to ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1535/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Administrator, Kannur

Medical College, Anjarakandy, Kannur and the workman

of the above referred establishment represented by

The Secretary, Indian Nurses Association, Kannur

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether deductions made from the wages of Staff

Nurses of Kannur Medical College at the rate of

` 1,800 per month towards hostel rent by the

management of Kannur Medical College,

Anjarakandy is justifiable or not ? If not what

relief the worker is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1536/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Secretary, SNDP

Union, Pulpally, Wayanad and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Kamalesan, Seethalayam,

Amarakuni P. O., Asramakolly, Pulpally, Wayanad

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

iii

that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Kamalesan,

Clerk, SNDP Union, Pulpally by the management

is justifiable?

If not, what are the relief the

worker is entitled to?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1541/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Senior Manager

(P&A), United Spirits Ltd., P. B. No. 2, Varanad P. O.,

Alappuzha and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, McDowell

Highrange Brewery Employees Union (CITU), Reg.

No. 7/1977, Varanad P. O., Cherthala in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand of the Union for transfer and

posting of canteen workers to production unit in

United Spirits, Cherthala is justifiable ? If not,

what relief they are entitled to ?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1542/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Ltd. (KAMCO),

Athani P. O.-683 585 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment respresented by (1) The Secretary,

KAMCO Employees Association (INTUC), Athani P. O.-

683 585 (2) The Secretary, KAMCO Employees Union

(CITU), Athani P. O. (3) The Secretary, KAMCO Employees

Federation (AITUC), Athani P. O. (4) The Secretary,

KAMCO Employees Centre (UTUC), Athani P. O.

(5) The General Secretary, KAMCO Employees Union,

Reg. No. 146/74, (INTUC), Athani P. O.-683 505 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of normal increment to workers

who have got promotion before 16-6-2010 and

whose pay has been stepped up to the pay of

junior by the management of M/s Kerala Agro

Machinery Corporation Ltd., Athani, Aluva is

justifiable ? If not, what are the remedies the

workers are entitled to ?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1543/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing

Director, M/s Prima Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Prima House,

South Kalamassery-682 033 (2) The Managing Director,

M/s PAPL EXIM INDIA Ltd., 4/758, South Kalamassery-

682 033 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Smt. Annie Tomy, W/o Tomy, Thaiparambil

House, Kolakkad Colony, Erumathala P. O., Keezhmadu,

Aluva in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

dismissal

from

service

of

Smt. Annie Tomy by the managements of Prima

Beverages Ltd., & PAPL EXIM INDIA Ltd. is

justifiable? If not, what relief she is entitled to?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1585/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Itteera Kavungal,

Proprietor, CMC Centre Enterprises, A-13, Kaloor Tower,

Kaloor, Kochi-17 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Smt. Rosily Jacob, Anathazhath Veedu,

Mother Theresa Road, Idappally-682 024 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

iv

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Rosily Jacob by the management of CMC

Enterprises is justifiable ?

If not, what are the

reliefs she is entitled to ?

(10)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1586/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Trichur Furniture Industries, Vazhuthacaud, Opp. Women’s

College, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri M. R. Sajayakumar, J.P.N. 9,

16/1469, Jagathy, Kannetumukku, Thiruvananthapuram in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri M. R. Sajayakumar, workman by the

management of Trichur Furniture Industries,

Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable?

If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(11)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1587/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Managing Director,

Autokast Limited, S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala-688 582 and

the workmen of the above referred establishment

respresented by (1) the President, Mararikulam Block Steel

Complex Workers Union [INTUC (I)], Reg. No. 480/80,

Autokast, Autokast Unit, Cherthala, (2) the President,

Headload and General Workers Union [INTUC (I)],

Autokast Unit, Cherthala, (3) the Secretary, Autokast Civil

Workers Union (CITU), Autokast Unit, Cherthala,

(4) the President, Silks General Workers Union (Displace),

Autokast Unit, Cherthala in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand for Permanency of the

temporary workers in M/s. Autokast Limited,

S. N. Puram P. O., Cherthala is justifiable ? If

yes what is the remedy ?

By order of the Governor,

ABDURRAHMAN EAKKADAN,

Under Secretary to Government.