KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

No.

\º¿

Vol. I

hmeyw 1

}

}

6th November 2012

2012 \hw_¿ 6

15th Karthika 1934

1934 Im¿ØnIw 15

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

22

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1538/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Janatha

Tiles, Moonniyur P. O., Malappuram District and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by (1) The General Secretary, Tile & Ceramics Workers

Union (AITUC), Feroke P. O., (2) The General Secretary,

Tile Employees Union (INTUC), Cheruvannur, Feroke P. O.,

(3) The General Secretary, Janatha Tile Workers Union

(CITU), Moonniyur P. O., Malappuram District in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the nonpayment of wages for the days

attending conciliation conference to the Trade

Unions representative, by the management of

Janatha Tiles, Moonniyur is justifiable ?

If not,

what is the remedy ?

(2)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 1539/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala State Co-operative Hospital, Complex and Centre for

Advanced Medical Services Ltd. No. 4386, Pariyaram P. O.,

Kannur and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by (1) The General Secretary,

Pariyaram Medical College Staff Association (INTUC),

Pariyaram P. O., Kannur (2) The Secretary,

Kerala State Co-operative Workers Federation (HMS),

Reg. No. 13-21/1988, E. P. Smaraka Mandiram, Yogasala

Road, Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it

is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to 22 workers

[(1) k\n¬Ipam¿, hn., (2) cqt]jv, sI.,

(3) k_nX, ]n. hn., (4) sI. sI. {ioIe,

(5) kpPnX, kn., (6) Zo]vXn, sI. ]n.,

(7) kµo]vIpam¿, Fw., (8) A¿®\, Fw.,

(9) kp`mjv, sI. hn., (10) cmPoh≥, sI.,

(11) do\, sI. hn., (12) KoX, bp., (13) k]v\, Sn.,

(14) tcJ, hn., (15) A\ntamƒ, (16) amb ZmtamZc≥,

(17) ssjPp, sI., (18) a[p, Fw. hn.,

(19) kptcjvIpam¿, sI., (20) {iotPjv, ]n.,

(21) kmPp, ]n. sI., (22) kt¥mjv, B¿.] by

the management of Kerala State Co-operative

Hospital Complex and Centre for Advanced

Medical Services, Pariyaram with effect from

30-9-2010 are justifiable or not ?

If not, what

relief the workers are entitled to ?

(3)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 1552/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri M. P. Abdul Rahman,

S/o

Chekootty

Haji,

Murinjampurayil

Veedu,

Thachampoyil P. O., Thamarassery via, Kozhikode

(2) Sri K. P. Ismail, S/o Koyakutty, Kuttiparambil Veedu,

Ekarool P. O., Unnikulam, Kozhikode and the workman of

the above referred establishment Sri David, S., S/o T. S.

John, S. T. Cottage, Near Central School, Karaparamb P. O.,

Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri David,

Supervisor of Savari Motors, Nadakkavu,

Kozhikode is justifiable ? If not, what relief

he is entitled to ?

(4)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 1553/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th September 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri K. Abbobaker,

Managing Partner, Arabian Gold Jewellery Works, Byepass

Road, Kondotty, Malappuram (2) Sri A. Moitheen Kutty,

S/o Kunhipokker, Ambalangadan Veedu, Melangadi P. O.,

Kondotty and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Saidalavi Alungal, S/o Avarankutty,

Kinattingal Veedu, Kondotty Airport P. O., Malappuram in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri. Alungal Saidalavi, Security Staff, Arabian

Gold Park, Kondotty by the management is

justifiable or not ?

If not, what relief the worker

is entitled to ?

(5)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 1593/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President, Tatapuram

Co-operative Store, Ltd. No. 269, Tatapuram, Ernakulam,

Kochi-682 018 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri T. Y. Shamsu, Thevaruparambil House,

Liberty Lane, Asoka Road, Kaloor P. O., Kochi-682 017 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri T. Y. Shamsu with effect from 24-7-2009 by the

management of Tatapuram Co-operative Store is

justifiable ?

If not, what are the reliefs he is

entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

ABDURRAHMAN EAKKADAN,

Under Secretary to Government.