KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

No.

\º¿

Vol. I

hmeyw 1

}

}

20th November 2012

2012 \hw_¿ 20

29th Karthika 1934

1934 Im¿ØnIw 29

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

24

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1621/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Nallathanni

Estate, K.D.H.P. Company Pvt. Ltd., Munnar and the

workman of the above referred establishment represented

by the General Secretary, Highrange Estate Supervisor and

Employees Union, Ganesh Bhavan, Pampanar P. O.,

Pin-685 537 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Saravanan, No. 5023,

Nadayar South Division, Nallathanni Estate by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1622/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. Geetha Rajendran,

W/o Late Rajendran, Trinity Tours & Travels,

T. C. 3/2772/34, 2nd Floor, Opp. IOC Pump, Pattom Palace

P. O., Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Anilkumar, G., T. C. 13/353,

Vayalil Veedu, Moolavilakom, Kunnukuzhi, Vanchiyoor

P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri G. Anilkumar, Office

Assistant from the service of Trinity Tours &

Travels by its management is justifiable ? If not,

what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1623/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. Geetha Rajendran,

W/o Late Rajendran, Trinity Tours & Travels,

T. C. 3/2772/34, 2nd Floor, Opp. IOC Pump, Pattom Palace

P. O., Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above

referred establishment Smt. Sailatha, T., T. C. 40/462, Third

Puthan Street, Mancaud P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Smt. Sailatha, T., Office

Assistant from the service of Trinity Tours &

Travels by its management is justifiable ? If not,

what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1624/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Abdul Nasar,

Chief Managing Director, Akbar Travels of India, Crew Sort

Market, Mumbai (2) The Manager, Akbar Travels (P) Ltd.,

Vellayambalam, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of

the above referred establishment represented by the

Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Vanijya Vyavasaya

Masdoor, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram-2 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Girijakumari, Office Attender by the

management of M/s Akbar Travels (P) Ltd.,

Vellayambalam, Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ?

If not, what reliefs she is entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1626/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Venture

Estate Florence Division, Kazhuthuruthy P. O., Kollam-691 309

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Kathireshan, S/o Balakrishna Pillai, Padinjattebhagam,

Kurumandal, Paravoor P. O., Kollam-691 301 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Kathiresan, No. 2108 by

the management of Harrisons Malayalam Limited

is justifiable ? If not, what relief the worker is

entitled to get ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1627/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Asokan, Proprietor,

Hyway Kichen (Vinayaka) Hotel, Ayoor Junction, Ayoor P. O.,

Kollam and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri Jayapraksh, General

Secretary, Quilon Hotel & Tea Shop Workers Union

(INTUC), Mundakkal, Kollam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri C. Thomas

by the management of Sri Asokan, Proprietor,

Hyway Kichen (Vinayaka) Hotel from 23-10-2011

is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the worker

is entitled to get ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1629/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Lockhart

Estate, Devikulam P. O., Idukki-685 612 and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union

(AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki-685 612 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Smt. Suseela, 3645 of

Lockhart Division, Lockhart Estate by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what relief she

is entitled to get ?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1630/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial

dispute exists between the Manager, Quilon Co-operative

Spinning Mills (Limited), Karamcode, Chathannoor

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Baburajan, Amal Nivas, Panthrandumuri Nagar-130,

Thattamala P. O., Kollam in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri S. Baburajan, Fitter from

the service of Quilon Co-operative Spinning Mills,

Chathannoor with effect from 1-8-2009 by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what relief he

is entitled to get ?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1631/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Manager, Falcon

Infrastructure Limited, Puthiyakavu Junction, Udyoga

Mandal (2) The Manager, Paragon Service Agency,

Vattekkunnam, Edappally and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by Sri Charles George,

President, Kerala State Motor Thozhilali Union (TUCI),

Maruthi Vilas, C. S. Road, Ernakulam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1.

Whether

the

contract

between

Falcon

Infrastructures Private Limited, Udyoga Mandal &

Paragon Service Agency, Edappally is “Sham

Contract” or not ?

2.

Whether the charter of demand, raised by the

petitioner union dated 5-7-2011 is justifiable or not ?

If yes, what is the benefit entitled to the worker ?

By order of the Governor,

ABDURRAHMAN EAKKADAN

Under Secretary to Government.

ORDER

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1680/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th October 2012.

Read:—1. G. O. (Rt.) No. 2385/08/LBR dated 19-11-2008.

2. Application

dated

10-8-2012

from

Sri A. Abdul Salam, Sruthi, Padanayar

Kulangara North, Karunagappally P. O.,

Kollam.

3. Letter No. I (3) 20543/12 dated 26-9-2012

from

the

Labour

Commissioner,

Thiruvananthapuram.

In the circumstances explained in the application read

as 2nd paper above and in the letter read as 3rd paper

above, Government are pleased to withdraw the Industrial

Dispute Case referred as per 1st paper above, from the

Labour Court, Kollam and to refer it to the Industrial

Tribunal, Kollam for further adjudication, invoking section

33 (B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Government Orders read as 1st paper above

stands modified to the above extent.

By order of the Governor,

S. REHNA BEGUM,

Deputy Secretary to Government.