KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2012

No.

\º¿

Vol. I

hmeyw 1

}

}

27th November 2012

2012 \hw_¿ 27

6th Agrahayana 1934

1934 A{K-lm-b\w 6

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆

25

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1628/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri K. P. Padmakumar,

(Licensee T. S. No. 43, Mithrakari, Kuttanad Range),

Kavalaserry, Mithrakari, Kuttanad and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Vijayan, Valiyaparmba

Veedu, Mithrakari, Muttar Panchayat represented by the

Secretary, Kuttanad Taluk Madya Vyavasaya Thozhilali

Union (CITU), Reg. No. 8/90, Mankomb, Thekkekkara

P. O. in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment to Sri Vijayan,

by the management of T. S. No. 43 Mithrakari,

Kuttanad Range is justifiable ? If not, what relief

he is entitled to ?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1632/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

Harrisons Malayalam Ltd., Bristo Road, Wellington Island,

Kochi-682 003 (2) the Manager, Harrisons Malayalam Ltd.,

Wallardie Estate, Wallardie P. O., Vandiperiyar and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Mohandas, C. R. No. 4472, Pattumala Division,

Wallardie Estate, Karadikkuzhy P. O., Vandiperiyar in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is dismissal of Sri Mohandas, C. R.

No. 4472, Pattumala, Wallardie Estate, managed by

M/s Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. with effect from

8-12-2003 by the management is justifiable?

If

not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1662/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the President, Block

Panchayat, Koduvally, Kozhikode-673 572 (2) the Medical

Officer, Community Health Centre, Koduvally P. O.,

Kozhikode-673 572 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri N. H. Muhammed, Kacherikunnummal

House, Koduvally P. O.-673 572 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri N. H. Muhammed by the

Hospital Management Committee, Koduvally

Community Health Centre with effect from

1-10-2011 is justifiable or not ?

If not, what relief

he is entitled to get?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1663/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri N. J. Francis,

Proprietor, Surya Restaurant & Bar, Perambra, Kozhikode

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Eeppan George & Roy (Neduveli Veedu),

Aarakkuzha P.O., Pannikuzha, Muvattupuzha in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri Eappan George also calling Roy, Neduveli

House, Aarakkuzha

P.

O.,

Pannikuzha,

Muvattupuzha by the management of Surya

Restaurant & Bar, Perambra, Kozhikode is

justifiable ?

If not what relief he is entitled

to get ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1665/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Vijaya Pharmacy, Pattambi, Palakkad-679 306 and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri A. V. Muraleedharan S/o Govindan, Arkiyath House,

Kootumukham, Sreekandapuram, Kannur in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri A. V. Muraleedharan, Sales Staff (Sales

representative) by the management of Vijaya

Pharmacy, Pattambi is justifiable ?

If not, what

relief he is entitled to ?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1666/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Letchemy

Estate, Munnar P. O., Idukki and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Devikulam Estate Employees Union (CITU),

Munnar P. O., Idukki, Pin-685 612 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is dismissal of Sri John David (P. F. No.

2914), West Division, Letchemy Estate by the

management is justifiable ?

If not, what relief the

worker is entitled to ?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1667/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri K. Ramesh,

Managing Partner, SD Pharmacy, P. B. No. 4204, Palace

Road, Alappuzha, Kerala-688 011 (2) Smt. Lakshmy Gopal,

Proprietor, M/s. Oriental Marketing Services,

Balabhavan Road, Alappuzha-688 011 and the workmen of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Kerala Medical and Sales

Representative’s Association (CITU), Affiliated to FMRAI,

R

e

g

i

s

t

r

a

t

i

o

n

No. 170/67, Fairuz Estate, Cemetery Junction, Ernakulam-

682 018 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Prince Thomas, Ernakulam, Sri Sebin Bose,

Idukki, Sri Suresh, R., Calicut, Sri N. Murugadass,

Palakkad and Sri Sojan Thomas, Alappuzha by the

opposite parties are justifiable ?

If not, what

reliefs the workmen are entitled to ?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1668/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President, Thiruvarpu

Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. No. K. 58-D,

Thiruvarpu P. O., Kottayam (2) the Secretary, Thiruvarpu

Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangham Ltd. No. K. 58-D,

Thiruvarpu P. O., Kottayam and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri C. P. Salimon, Chathancode,

Thiruvarpu P. O., Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to C. P. Salimon,

Milk Tester, Thiruvarpu Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana

Sangham Ltd. No. K. 58-D, Thiruvarpu P. O.,

Kottayam by the management is justifiable ?

If

not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1669/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Hope

Plantations, Glenmary Estate, Peermade, and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Kerala Plantation Workers Thozhilali

Union (INTUC), Vandiperiyar, Idukki in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Baby, C. R. No. 4298 of Woodland Division,

Glenmary Estate, Peermade by the management of

M/s. Hope Plantations is justifiable ? If not, what

relief the workman is entitled to ?

(10)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1670/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing Director,

Harrisons Malayalam Ltd., Bristo Road, Wellington Island,

Kochi-682 003, (2) the Manager, Harrisons Malayalam Ltd.,

Moongalar Estate, Vandiperiyar, Idukki and the workmen of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Peerumade Thottam Thozhilali Union

(CITU), P. R. Centre, Vandiperiyar in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Vijay Antony, C. R.

No. 6201 Worker, Moongalar Estate II Division

by the management is justifiable ?

If not, what

relief he is entitled to ?

(11)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1681/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Shajahan, Managing

Partner, Choice Industries, Idimoozhikal, Chelambra Post,

Malappuram, (2) Sri T. P. Moitheen Koya, Managing

Partner, Choice Industries, Idimoozhikal, Chelambra Post,

Malappuram and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary,

Industrial & General Workers Union (INTUC),

Cheruvannoor, Feroke Post, Pin-673 631, Kozhikode in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kozhikode. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wage increase and closure of

the establishment by the management of Choice

Industries, Idimoozhikal, Chelambra, Malappuram

is justifiable ?

If not, what relief they are

entitled to ?

(12)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1684/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 20th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Rajendra Babu,

Kuttippurathu veedu, Komalapuram, Avalukunnu P. O.,

Alappuzha and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Alexander, P. R., Karukottal, Puthuparamb,

Pallikkachira P. O., Payippad, Changanacherry, Pin-686 537

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri P. R. Alexander, by the management of Oppal

Furniture, Komalapuram is justifiable ?

If not,

what is the relief he is entitled to ?

(13)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1718/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 30th October 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Best Bricks &

Tile Works, Nilambur RS (P.O.), Malappuram-679 330 and

the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by (1) The Secretary, Best Bricks & Tile

Employees Union (AITUC), Nilambur RS (P. O.),

Malappuram-679 330, (2) The Secretary, Best Bricks & Tile

Works Union (CITU), Nilambur RS (P.O.), Malappuram-

679 330, (3) The Secretary, Best Bricks & Tile Workers

Union (INTUC), Nilambur RS (P.O.), Malappuram-679 330

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period

of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether item No. 3, 4, 5 in the charter of demand of

the union in M/s Best Bricks & Tile Works,

Nilambur is justifiable ?

If not, what is the

remedy ?

(14)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1737/2012/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st November 2012.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Chairman, Mary Matha

College of Engineering and Technology (A PRS Group

Institution), Paliyodu, Dalummugham P. O., Neyyattinkara

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Asok Kumar, V., Charuvila Veedu, Mannakkallu,

Nellimoodu P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

termination

of

service

of

Sri V. Ashok Kumar, workman by the management

of Mary Matha College of Engineering and

Technology, Paliyodu, is justifiable ?

If not,

what are the relief he is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

ABDURRAHMAN EAKKADAN,

Under Secretary to Government.