KERALA GAZETTE
tIcf Kkddv
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv
©
Government of Kerala
tIcf k¿°m¿
2013
No.
\º¿
Vol. II
hmeyw 2
}
}
29th January 2013
2013 P\p-hcn 29
9th Magha 1934
1934 amLw 9
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNm∆
5
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073
dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. cPn. \º¿
KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G .O. (Rt.) No. 1992/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 27th December 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
Plant Lipids Pvt. Ltd., Kadayiruppu, Kolancherry and the
workmen of the above referred establishment represented
by the Secretary, Ernakulam District Industrial Estate
Masdoor Sangh (B. M. S.), BMS Office, Court Road,
Perumbavoor in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.
The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment of the worker Smt.
Sini, P. by the management of Plant Lipids
Pvt. Ltd., Kadayiruppu is justifiable ? If not, what
are the reliefs she is entitled to ?
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 2017/2012/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 28th December 2012.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri K. Sadasivan,
Managing Director, Prasanthi Hotel & Bar, Parassala,
Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the
above
referred
establishment
represented
by
Sri Manacaud Chandrankutty, General Secretary,
Thiruvananthapuram District Hotel & Restaurant
Employees
Congress
(INTUC),
T.C.
44/1582,
Shankhuchakra Building, Thiruvananthapuram-23 in respect
of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of Sri R. Raghul and
Sri S. S. Visakh, workers from the service of
Prasanthi Hotel & Bar, Parassala by its
management is justifiable ? If not, what are the
reliefs they are entitled to ?
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 10/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 1st January 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
KSRTC, Transport Bhavan, Fort, Thiruvananthapuram and
the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri K. G. Somarajan Pillai, Puthanvila Thekkethil Veedu,
Anayadi P. O., Shooranad, Kollam in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the removal of Sri K. G. Somarajan Pillai from
the service of KSRTC as Conductor is justifiable ?
If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?
(4)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 12/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 1st January 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between (1) the PTA President,
Government Higher Secondary School, Tirurangadi,
Malappuram District, (2) the Chairman, Noon Feeding
Committee, Government Higher Secondary School,
Tirurangadi, Malappuram District and the worker of the
above referred establishment Smt. Baby, M., Eledath,
Munniyoor, Tirurangadi, Malappuram District represented
by the Secretary, Malappuram District School Pachaka
Thozhilali Union (CITU), District Committee Office, Uphill,
Malappuram District in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.
The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Baby, M.,
Cook in Government Higher Secondary School,
Tirurangadi by the management is justifiable ?
If not, what relief she is entitled to ?
(5)
G . O. (Rt.) No. 19/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd January 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri Sudheerkumar,
Managing Partner, New Geetha Bakery, Mele Chovva,
Kannur-6 and the workmen of the above referred
establishment represented by the Secretary, Kannur District
Shop Establishment & Commercial Workers Union
(INTUC), Fort Road, Kannur in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kannur.
The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Kumari P. Savitha by the management of New
Geetha Bakery, Mele Chovva, Kannur with effect
from 5-2-2012 is justifiable? If not, what relief the
worker is entitled to ?
(6)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 21/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd January 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
(1) Sri T. Muhammed Mustafa (Managing Director, Tharayil
Automobiles Pvt. Ltd.), s/o Tharayil Muhammed Musliary
(Late), Tharayil House, Makkaraparamba P. O.,
Malappuram District (2) Sri T. Abdul Rahim (Executive
Director, Tharayil Automobiles Pvt. Ltd.),
s/o Tharayil Muhammed Musliary (Late), Tharayil
House, Makkaraparamba P. O., Malappuram District and
the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri F. J. Samuel, 24 D, O. P. Quarters, Near Anganavadi,
Angadippuram P. O., Malappuram District in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.
The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Sri F. J. Samuel by the management of Tharayil
Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., Tirurkad is justifiable?
If not, what is the remedy ?
By order of the Governor,
RAMANKUTTY, C.,
Under Secretary to Government.