KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

}

}

26th February 2013

2013 s^{_p-hcn 26

7th Phalguna 1934

1934 ^m¬Kp\w 7

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

9

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 22/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Branch Head, Lead

Line Systems Pvt. Ltd., Near B. S. N. L. Office, Uppalam

Road, Statue, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of

the above referred establishment Smt. R. B. Sunitha,

T. C. 39/1770(4), Saroma, H. No. 43, Yamuna Nagar,

II Street, Manacaud P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

termination

of

service

of

Smt. R. B. Sunitha from the service of Lead Line

Systems Pvt. Ltd., Thiruvananthapuram is

justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs she is

entitled to ?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 23/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 2nd January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Licencee

Smt.

Anitha

Jagannivas,

Pidikkamparambil,

Kezhuvamkulam P. O., Kottayam District and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Madya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union

(AITUC), Pala, Kottayam in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri Abraham, P. N., Sri Shinjo, N., workers of

T. S. No. 12, Charala, Pala, Kottayam by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what relief the

workmen is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 51/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the (1) Capt. Vijayan

Madathil (Chairman and Managing Director, Rock

Security Force and House Keeping Services),

Mullaparambil House, (PJRA 43), New Kalavath Road,

Palarivattam, Cochin-25, and (2) the Manager, Kinfra Food

Industries Park, Kakkancheri, Malappuram District and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri

Santhiprakash,

P.,

Palaparambil

House,

Padinjattumuri P. O., Koottilangadi Vazhy, Malappuram

District-676 506 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Santhiprakash P., Security Guard, Kinfra Food

Industries Park, Kakkancheri by the management

is justifiable ? If not, what is the remedy ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 65/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Senior Manager,

K. C. M. M. F. Ltd., Cattle Feed Plant, Malampuzha-678 651

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by Sri Gopalakrishnan (Convener, Samyuktha

Thozhilali Union, Milma Cattle Feed Plant), Anachira

House, Sekharipuram P. O., Palakkad, in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

72 empanel Workers by the management of Milma

Cattle Feed Plant, Manthakkattu, Malampuzha ? If

so, what relief they are entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 68/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Smt. Nishi Jahangir

d/o Latheef (Managing Director, N. J. Business

Corporation), Stone House, Kaithottil Lane, Aluva,

Ernakulam-683 101 and the workmen of the above referred

establishment Sri Dinesh Kumar P. R., Lakshmi Nivas,

Kavaloor Road, Kolathara P. O., Kozhikode-673 655 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Dinesh Kumar, P. R., (Lakshmi Nivas, Kavaloor

Road, Kolathara P. O., Kozhikode-673 655) by the

management of N. J. Business Corporation (Kallai,

Kozhikode) is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to ?

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 99/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President,

P. T. A., L. M. S. Higher Secondary School, Chempoor,

Neyyattinkara Taluk and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Panchaman s/o Yesudasan,

Chuttumannadi Veedu, Kalai, Ottasekharamangalam,

Keezharoor, Neyyattinkara Taluk in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Y. Panchaman, Security Guard by the

Management of Parent Teacher Association, L. M. S.

Higher

Secondary

School,

Chempoor,

Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable ? If not, what

are the reliefs entitled to him ?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 100/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an

industrial

dispute

exists

between

the

Smt. Aleyamma Papachan, Proprietor, Popular Tyres,

Lissy Junction, Ernakulam, Kochi-18 and the workman of

the above referred establishment Sri P. P. Thomas,

Pallipattuthottathil House, Kidangoor P. O., Angamaly,

Ernakulam District in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri P. P. Thomas, Employee of Popular Tyres,

Lissy Junction, Ernakulam, Kochi-18 by the

management is justifiable ? If not, what are the

reliefs he is entitled to ?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 102/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Principal,

C. H. Mohammed Koya Memorial State Institute

for

the

Mentally

Challenged,

Pangappara,

Thiruvananthapuram-695 581 and the workmen of the

above referred establishment Smt. V. Chandrika, Mangalath

Veedu, Pangappara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. V. Chandrika by the management of

C. H. Mohammed Koya Memorial State Institute

for the Mentally Challanged (SIMC) is

justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs she is

entitled to ?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 103/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Partner,

Shelly Gas Agency, Nettayam, Thiruvananthapuram-695 013

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri R. Sajikumar, Thiruvathira, Mampazhakkunnu,

Manikanteswaram P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 013 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri R. Saji Kumar, delivery boy cum Driver of

Shelly Gas Agency by its management is

justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs entitled to

him ?

(10)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 104/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Secretary,

Padinjare Shafi Musilm Jamaath, Alappuzha-688 012 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Ummer, Palliveliyil, Punnappra P. O., Alappuzha in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether Sri Ummer is a workman under section (s)

of ID Act 1947 and if so whether the termination

of employment to Sri Ummer in Padinjare

Shafi Muslim Jamaath by the management is

justifiable ? If not, what is the relief he is entitled

to ?

(11)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 105/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Smt. Lailabeegum, Shafi

Manzil, Karikode, Kottankara, Kollam and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by

Sri P. T. Raju, General Secretary, Kollam District Hotel and

Shops Workers Union (CITU), Kollam-13 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment of Sri Iwan Alias

Kunjumon with effect from 10-10-2010 by the

management of Hotel Original, Beach Road is

justifiable or not? If not, what relief the worker

is entitled to get?

(12)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 106/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Senior Manager, Pobs

Enterprises (Private) Limited, Gramby Estate,

Vandiperiyar-685 533, Idukki District and the workmen of

the above referred establishment represented by the

Secretary, Kerala Plantation Workers Union (INTUC),

Vandiperiyar-685 533, Idukki District in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of employment to

Sri Paramasivan, C. R. No. 1344 Watcher, Gramby

Estate, Vandiperiyar by the Management of Pobs

Enterprises (Private) Ltd.? If yes, what relief he

is entitled to?

(13)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 107/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Sri Rajeev, Rajeev

Bhavanam (Rajeev Sadanam), Haripad, (Proprietor Rajeev

Tourist Home) and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Rajappan, Ullannoor Veedu,

Akamkudi P. O., Alappuzha in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Rajappan

Sweeper by the management of Rajeev Tourist

Home, Haripad is justifiable? If not, what are

the relief he is entitled to?

(14)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 108/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Abdul Rahim,

Managing Director, Lulu Margin Free Mart, Chinnakkada,

Kollam and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri G. Jayaprakash, General

Secretary, Quilon Shops and Establishment Employees

Union (INTUC), Mundakkal, Kollam-691 001 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal Kollam.

The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. S. Krishnakumari with effect from 13-4-2012

by the management of Lulu Margin Free Mart,

Chinnakada, Kollam is justifiable? If not, what

relief she is entitled to?

(15)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 109/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala Soaps and Oils Ltd., West Hill, Kozhikode-673 005

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri P. Asokan Nair, Naduvasseri House, Payimbra P. O., Via.

Kundamangalam, Kozhikode in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment/VRS benefit to

Sri Asokan Nair P. by the management of Kerala

Soaps and Oils Ltd.,West Hill, Kozhikode is

justifiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(16)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 125/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing

Director, Harrisons Malayalam Limited, Bristo Road,

Wellington Island, Kochi-682 003, (2) Manager, Harrisons

Malayalam Limited, Wallardi Estate, Wallardi P. O.,

Vandiperiyar and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by Secretary, Peermade Thottam

Thozilali Union (CITU), PR Centre Vandiperiyar in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Santhi,

C. R. No. 4871 Temporary Worker, Wallardi Estate,

Pattumala Division with effect from 28-11-2003 is

justifiable? If not, what is the reliefs the worker

is entitled to get?

(17)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 177/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Principal,

Gokulam Public School, Kurikkilad, Vatakara and

(2) Administrative Officer, Gokulam Public School,

Kurikkilad, Vatakara and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Kozhikode

District Motor and Engineering Workers Union, CITU,

Vatakara Area Committee, Dwaraka Tourist Home, Near Old

Bus Stand, Vatakara-673 101 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Pooveri

Sasi, Cleaner of School Bus by the management

of Gokulam Public School, Vatakara is justifiable?

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

(18)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 178/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Elappully

Service Co-operative Bank Limited (No. F. 1193), Elappully

P. O., Palakkad-678 622 and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri K. Divakaran s/o Kuppamuthu,

Melepokkanthodu, Menonpara P. O., Palakkad in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri K. Divakaran, Junior Clerk

of Elappully Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., by

the Management is justifiable. If not, what relief

he is entitled to ?

(19)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 179/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, The Campco

Limited, Bayar Branch, P. O. Bayar, Kasargod District and

the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the Secretary, Vanigya Sramika Sangh,

B. M. S., Kasargod in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand for 25% hike and existing

Piece-rate wages to the workers of M/s Campco

Limited, Bayar Branch, Kasargod is justifiable.

If yes, what relief entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.