Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 49/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

Siraj Daily, Kozhikode and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Binish, K., Karakad Parambil,

Marykkunnu P. O., Kozhikode-12 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Shri K. Binish from service

by the management of Siraj Daily, Kozhikode is

justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 52/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Mirshad, C., Proprietor,

Chakkalakkal Packaging Industries, Ambalavalavu,

Pallikkal P. O.-673 653, Malappuram District and the

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

}

}

5th March 2013

2013 am¿®v 5

14th Phalguna 1934

1934 ^mÂKp\w 14

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

10

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

5th MARCH 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

34

worker

of

the

above

referred

establishment

Smt. Athiparambath Janaki, D/o Chakki, Kariyedathkunnu

Veedu, Jawans Nagar, Pallikkal P. O.-673 653, Malappuram

District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Athiparambath Janaki by the owner of

Chakkalakkal Packaging Industries, Ambalavalavu,

Pallikkal P. O., Malappuram District is Justifiable?

If not, what is the remedy?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 66/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Proprietor,

Professional Security Service, P. O. Kuthiravattom,

Kozhikode-673 016 and (2) Chairman, Baby Memorial

Hospital, I. G. Road, Kozhikode and the workmen of the

above referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Kozhikode District Security Staff Association

(CITU), CITU District Centre, S. K. Temple Road,

Kozhikode-673 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to five security

workers by the management of Professional

Security Service, Kuthiravattom, Kozhikode is

justifiable? If not, what relief they are entitled to?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 67/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 7th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Kerala Soaps & Oils Ltd., West Hill, Kozhikode-673 005

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Premkumar, K., Mukthi, Odinilam Parambu, Chomath

Thazham, P. O. Iranjippalam, Kozhikode-673 005 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment/VRS benefit to

Shri K. Premkumar by the management of Kerala

Soaps & Oils Ltd., West Hill, Kozhikode is

justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 101/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri S. Reji, Proprietor, Sudha

Indane

Service,

Near

Municipal

Town

Hall,

Attingal P. O. and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Babu, Niranjana Nivas, Kottiyodu,

Attingal P. O.-695 101 in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Babu,

Worker of Sudha Indane Service, Attingal by its

management is justifiable ?

If not, what are the

reliefs he is entitled to?

5th MARCH 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

35

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 121/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri J. Radhakrishna Pillai,

Proprietor, Chothi Enterprises, Kottankkara, Mampuzha,

Kollam and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Sri G. Madhavan Pillai,

General Secretary, Kerala State Cashew Vyavasaya

Masdoor Sangh (BMS), BMS Bhavan, Thamarakkulam,

Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the claim of Smt. Sini, Card No. 1 and

Smt. Raji, Card No. 2 to be appointed as monthly

rated workman in M/s. Chothi Enterprises,

Kottankkara, Kollam is justifiable ?

If yes, what

relief they are entitled to?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 123/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri S. Shaju, Managing

Director, City Constructions, 2nd Floor, 101 SJ Building,

Near Dhanya Theatre, Kadappakkada, Kollam and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by the General Secretary, Kerala Skilled & General Workers

Union,

Trade

Union,

UTUC(M),

Venad

Nagar,

Reg. No. 02/50-01, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to ten workers

namely Brehmadasan, Babu, K. Unni, K. Mani,

V. Babu, Rajan, S. Sathyan, G. Babu, M. Sunil and

D. Sasidharan Pillai by the management of City

Construction, Kadappakada, Kollam is justifiable ?

If not, what relief they are entitled to?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 124/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the D.G.M., H.R. &

Administrator, Elite Foods (Private) Limited, Aroor P. O.,

Cherthala and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Aroor

Vyavasaya Thozhilali Kendram, Reg. No. 03/13/89, Aroor P. O.,

Cherthala-688 534, in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the action of the management of M/s. Elite

Foods (Private) Limited, Aroor in with-holding two

annual increments to Smt. Mary Shyma Peter &

Smt. Sherly, P. J., is justifiable? If not what relief

they are entitled to?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 131/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 17th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Secretary,

Perumbavoor Merchants Association, E. R. 7/64, Vyapara

Bhavan, Perumbavoor and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri R. Balakrishnan Nair, Varikkat

House, G. K. Pillai Lane, Perumbavoor in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

5th MARCH 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

36

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri Balakrishnan Nair, R., Clerk by the Management

of Perumbavoor, Merchant Association is justifiable?

If not, what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to?

(10)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 192/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Joy Ouseph,

Thottapilli, Thevara, Cochin-13 (2) Sri Roy Ouseph,

Thottapilli, Thevara, Cochin-13 and the workmen of the

above referred establishment Sri Dominic, Palakkal House,

Pattanacaud P. O., Cherthala-688 531 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Dominic by the

Contractors Joy Ouseph and Roy Ouseph is

justifiable? If not, what are the relief he is

entitled to?

(11)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 193/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Palm

Fibre (India) Private Limited, Pathirapally P. O., Alappuzha

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Alleppy Factory Staff

Association, Reg. No. (392/78), CITU District Committee

Office, Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha.

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is violation of terms of bilateral

settlement on wage revision by the management

of M/s. Palm Fibre (India) Ltd., Pathirappally as

alleged by the Union? If so, what are the reliefs

they are entitled to?

(12)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 194/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Manager,

West Coast Refrigeration & Food Engineering (Private)

Limited (Amalgam Group), Thuravoor P. O., Cherthala

(2) The Director, Amalgam Enterprises, Amalgam House,

XXIV/1604, Plot No. 9, Bristo Road, Wellingdon Island,

Cochin and the worker of the above referred establishment

Smt. Gracy, M. P., W/o Joy, Thuruthelkkalam House,

Eramallur P. O., Cherthala in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Gracy @

Gracy, M. P. in West Coast Refrigeration and

Food Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd. (Amalgam Group)

is justifiable? If not, what relief she is

entitled to?

(13)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 202/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Aswas Community Pharmacy, Medical College Junction,

Near Indian Coffee House, Alappuzha and the workman of

the above referred establishment Sri Suresh Kumar, K. S.,

Kunnil Veedu, Pullikkanakku P. O., Kayamkulam

5th MARCH 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

37

represented by the Secretary, Kerala Private Pharmacist

Association, Alappuzha District Committee, Reg. No. 03-21/88,

Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment to

Sri Suresh Kumar, K. S., in Aswas Community

Pharmacy by the management is justifiable ?

If not, what is the relief he is entitled to ?

(14)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 203/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Assistant Manager,

Supply Co., Alappuzha Depot, (2) The Shop Manager,

Labham Store, Supply Co., Kaichoondi Junction,

Alappuzha and the worker of the above referred

establishment Smt. T. K. Bindu, W/o R. Unnikrishnan,

Radhabhavanam, Asramam West, Avalookunnu P. O.,

Alappuzha represented by the President, Supply Co.

Workers Federation (AITUC), T. V. Bhavan, Mullackal,

Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Smt. Bindhu,

Labham Store, Supply Co., Kaichoondi Junction,

Alappuzha is justifiable ? If not, what is the relief

she is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.