PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 122/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 16th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri A. R. Sharaffudeen,

(Proprietor), Al Ameen Medicals, Darul Aman,

Manayilkulangara, Thirumullavaram P. O., Kollam and the

workman of the above referred establishment Sri V. Sivarajan,

S. P. Nivas, Thirumullavaram P. O., Kollam in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of compensation/service

benefits to Sri V. Sivarajan, Pharmacist for his

service rendered from 1-1-2002 to 31-12-2011

by the management of Al-Ameen Medicals,

Kollam ? If yes, what is the quantum ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 175/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Unipharma,

44/511 A(1), Opposite Pavakkulam Temple, Ernakulam,

Cochin-17 and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the District Secretary,

Ernakulam District Medical Employees Union (CITU),

Reg. No. 07-54/97, Corporation Building, Kaloor Bus

Stand, Cochin-17 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

}

}

12th March 2013

2013 amˬv 12

21st Phalguna 1934

1934 ^m¬Kp\w 21

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

11

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

12th MARCH 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

40

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri C. K. Subramanyan by the management of

Unifarma,

Whole

Sale

Pharmaceutical

Distributers, Kaloor is justifiable ? If not, what

are the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 176/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Group Manager,

Nilagiri Tea Estates Limited, Stagbrook Estate,

P. B. No. 2, Peermade P. O., Idukki District, Pin-685 531

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, High Range

Plantation Workers Union, Peermade, Peermade P. O.,

Idukki District, Pin-685 531 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki

(Peermade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award

within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment (Making and

Supplying tea for workers) of Smt. Krishnakumari,

C. R. No. 2573, Permanent Worker Stagbrook

Estate, Peermade, managed by the Nilagiri Estate

Ltd. by the Management with effect from

31-1-2012 is justifiable ? If not, what reliefs she

is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 204/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Managing

Director, M/s Prima Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Prima House,

South Kalamassery-682 033, (2) The Managing Director,

M/s PAPL EXIM India Ltd., 4/758, South Kalamassery-

682 033 and the workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. Gorothy Ganther W/o Johny, Type 2P21/5, NAD

Quarters, NAD P. O., Aluva in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

dismissal

from

service

of

Smt. Gorothy Ganther by the managements of

Prima Beverages Pvt. Ltd. and PAPL EXIM India

Ltd. is justifiable ? If not, what relief she is

entitled to ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 205/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Secretary,

St. Marys

Educational

&

Cultural

Society,

Paliakkara, Thiruvalla-689 101, (2) The Principal,

St. Marys Residential Central School, Alappuzha and the

workmen of the above referred establishment

Smt. Bindhu Prabhakar, Panchami, Pathirapally P. O.,

Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal Smt. Bindu Prabhakar, Cashier,

St. Marys Residential Central School, Alappuzha

by the management of St. Marys Educational and

Cultural Society, Alappuzha is justifiable? If not,

what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 206/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing

Director, Kerala State Homeopathic Co-operative

Pharmacy Limited (Hompco.), Pathirappally P. O.,

Alappuzha-688 521, (2) Chief Pharmacy Officer, Kerala

State Homeopathic Co-operative Pharmacy Limited

(Hompco.), Pathirappally P. O., Alappuzha-688 521 and

12th MARCH 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

41

the workmen of the above referred establishment

Smt. Yamuna, M. S. D/o Saraswathyamma, Sayoojyam,

S.L. Puram P. O., Mararikkulam North, Alappuzha in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Yamuna, S. M., in Kerala State Homeopathic

Co-operative Pharmacy, Alappuzha by the

management is justifiable? If not, what are the

relief she is entitled to ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 218/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 31st January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion

that

an

industrial

dispute

exists

between

the Managing Director, M/s Al-hind Tours & Travels,

Calicut and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri K. P. Venugopal, Kollathu Veedu,

P. O. Thiruvannur, Calicut-613 029 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri K. P. Venugopal,

Kollath, P. O. Thiruvannur, Calicut from service

by the management of M/s Al-hind Tours &

Travels, Calicut is justifiable ? If not, what relief

he is entitled to get ?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 219/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 31st January 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion

that

an

industrial

dispute

exists

between

the Chairman & Managing Director, Yogakshemam Kuries

& Loans Limited, Yogakshemam Apartment, Thiruvambadi,

Thrissur-680 022 and the worker of the above referred

establishment Smt. Jayanthi, C. K., Prakash Nivas,

Thiruvonam House, Kavalappara P. O., Shornur in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Jayanthi, C. K., Branch in Charge,

Yogakshemam Kuries & Loans Limited,

Kulappully by the management is justifiable or

not ; if not what relief she is entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.