PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 456/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an

industrial

dispute

exists

between

(1)

Sri Abraham Tharakan, Managing Director, Amalgam

Enterprises, Amalgam House, XXIV/1604, Plot No. 9,

Bristo Road, Wellingdon Island, Kochi (2) The Manager,

West Coast Refrigeration and Food Engineering Private

Limited (Amalgam Group), Kuthiathode, Thuravoor P. O.,

Alappuzha and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri K.X. Jacob, Kurisinkal House, Kaithaveli,

Kannamali P. O., Kochi-8 in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the claim for reinstatement after accepting

retrenchment compensation of Sri K. X. Jacob,

Fabricator in M/s. West Coast Refrigeration

and Food Engineering (P) Limited, Kuthiathode

with effect from 1-10-2010 is justifiable. If so, what

are the reliefs he is entitled to?

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

}

}

23rd April 2013

2013 G{]n¬ 23

3rd Vaisakha 1935

1935 sshimJw 3

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncph\¥]pcw, sNmΔ

17

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

23rd APRIL 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

60

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 457/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director,

Pa1m Fibre (India) Private Limited, Pathirapally P. O.,

Alappuzha-688 521 and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary,

Alappuzha Coir Factory Workers Union (CITU), Reg.

No. 1/67, Our Building, North of District Court,

Thathampalli P.O., Alappuzha in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the terminaton of employment to

Smt. Aji. V. R., Production Helper in Pa1m Fibre

(India) Private Limited, Pathirapally by the

management is justifiable? If so, what are the

reliefs she is entitled to?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 478/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between The Secretary, P.T.A.,

Kendriya Vidyalaya Shift-I, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram-4

and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri

R. Venu Gopalan Nair, Maniveena, Kurinchilakkode,

Mundela P. O., Nedumangad in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the terminaton of Sri Venu Gopalan Nair,

Conductor, from the Service of opposite party

management is justifiable? If not, what are the

reliefs he is entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 484/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between The Managing

Director, KEL, Mamala P.O., Kochi-682 305 and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by (1) General Secretary, KEL Employees Congress

(INTUC), Mamala P. O. -682 305 (2) General Secretary, KEL

Employees Union (CITU), Mamala P.O.-682 305 (3)

General Secretary, KEL Workers Union (HMS), Mamala

P.O.-682 305 (4) General Secretary, KEL Employees

Organisation (AITUC), Mamala P. O.-682 305 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is discrimination in the promotion

policy to the workers of KEL , Mamala Unit to

that of other units of KEL at Kasargod and

Kundara ? If so, what is the relief ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 485/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between (1) The Managing

Director, Civil Supplies Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram

(2) The Assistant Manager, Supplyco Depot, Koduvally,

Palakutti and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri M. Velayudhan, Karimbarukuzhiyil,

Kodenchery, Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri M. Velayudhan, Karimbarukuzhiyil (H)

Kodenchery, Kozhikode by the management of

Supplyco Depot, Koduvally, Kozhikode is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to ?

23rd APRIL 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

61

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 487/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Muhammed Koya,

Proprietor, Moopans Hotel, Cheruvannur P. O.,

Feroke -673 631 and the workman of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Kozhikode

District Commercial Employees Union, C.I.T.U., Kozhikode

Mekhala Committee, Palayam Road, Kozhikode-1, in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that

the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the

Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the

award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Shri V. Muhammed by the Proprietor, Moopans

Hotel, Cheruvannur, Feroke is justifiable? If not,

what relief he is entitled to?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 488/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between The Proprietor, Delite

Sweet Parlour, Round South, Thrissur and the workman of

the above referred establishment Sri K. P. Paul,

S/o Paulose, Karerakkattil Veedu, Nedupuzha P. O.,

Thrissur-15 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that

the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the

Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri K. P. Paul, worker by the management of

Delite Sweet Parlour, Thrissur is justifiable? If

not, what relief he is entitled to get?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 489/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 19th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between The Secretary, Keraleeya

Ayurveda Samajam Hospital, Shornur, Palakkad

District-679 123 and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri. Sreeroop K. S., Kalikulangara,

Thalassery P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that

the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the

Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Sreeroop, K. S., Massager, Keraleeya Ayurveda

Samajam Hospital by the Management is

justifiable or not? If not, What relief he is

entitled to?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 506/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 20th March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between (1) The Secretary, Valiya

Koonampayikulam Sree Bhagavathy Kshetram Trust,

Mulluvila, Vadakkevila P. O., Kollam, (2) The Principal, Valiya

Koonampayikulathamma College of Engineering and

Technology, Mulluvila, Vadakkevila P. O., Kollam, and the

workman of the above referred establishment Sri. Suresh

Babu, K., Aswathy, Puthalathazham, Vadakkevila P. O.,

Kollam, in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that

the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the

Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court, will pass the

award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment with effect from

1-6-2012 is justifiable? If not, what relief he

is entitled to?

23rd APRIL 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

62

(10)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 515/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 21st March 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Harrisons

Malayalam Limited, Arrappetta Estate, Meppadi P. O. and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Shri Shaji Thappasseriyil, Near AKG Bhavan, Kalpetta P. O.

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that

the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the

Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award

within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of employment to

Shri Shaji, Thappasseriyil, Kalpetta P. O. by the

management of Arrapetta Estate, Harrison

Malayalam Limited, Meppadi ? If so, what is the

remedy?

By order of the Governor,

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.