PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 603/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between the Managing

Director, Octovia Kuries Private Limited, Perinjanam

P. O.-680 686, Thrissur District and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri P. N. Radhakrishnan

S/o Poyyara Narayanan Master (Late,) Mathilakam P. O.,

Pin-680 685, Thrissur District in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri. P. N. Radhakrishnan

from the services of Octovia Kuries (P) Ltd.,

Perinjanam is justifiable? If not, what relief he is

entitled to get?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 604/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Manager,

Kerala State Beverages Corporation Limited, Ware House,

S.H. Mount P.O., Kottayam (2) Old Contractor

Smt. Jagadamma, K. P., Convenor, Aiswarya Mahila Samajam,

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

}

}

21st May 2013

2013 tabv 21

31st Vaisakha 1935

1935 sshimJw 31

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncph\¥]pcw, sNmΔ

21

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

21st MAY 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

78

Areeparambu P.O., Kottayam (3) New Contractor:

Smt. Salikkutty, Convenor, Aiswarya Kudumbasree Unit,

Kerala State Beverages Corporation, Ware House, S.H.

Mount P.O., Kottayam and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala

State Videsa Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union

(C.I.T.U.), Kottayam District Committee, Kottayam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. Santhamma, N., Smt. Radhamani Prasannan,

Smt. Pushpakumari, Smt. Usha Ravindran Workers,

Kerala State Beverages Corporation Ltd., Ware

House, S. H. Mount P. O., Kottayam by the

management is justifiable ? If not what relief the

workmen is entitled to ?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 605/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Head Master,

Govt. UPS, Vamanapuram-695 606 (2) The President (PTA),

Govt. UPS, Vamanapuram-695 606 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Smt. B. Ambika,

Thekkazhikom, Vamanapuram P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-

695 606 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt. B. Ambika, daily waged employee by the

PTA President of Govt. U.P.S., Vamanapuram is

justifiable ? If so what are the reliefs

she is entitled to ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 606/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial

dispute exists between Sri K. R. Suresh Chandran, Dairy

Manager, Milma, Kollam Dairy and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri K. Sasidharan,

Krishnavilasom, Kattanam, Pallickkal P. O., Kayamkulam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri K. Sasidharan by the Management of Milma

Kollam Dairy is justifiable ? If not what relief the

worker is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 678/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 17th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Holy

Family Convent English Medium High School, Aravila,

Kavanad (P.O.), Kollam and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Quilon

District Motor & Mechanical Workers Union, C.I.T.U.

Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Jayakumar, School Bus

Driver by the Management of Holy Family

Convent English Medium High School, Aravila,

Kollam is justifiable? If not, what relief the worker

is entitled to get ?

21st MAY 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

79

(6)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 679/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 17th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between the Manager,

M/s Travancore Rubber and Tea Company, Pattom (P. O.),

Thiruvananthapuram-4 and the workmen of the above

reffered establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Kizhakkan Mekhala Plantation Workers Union,

I.N.T.U.C. Thenmala Valley Unit, Kazhuthuruttty in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Ganapathy by the

Management is Justifiable or not ? If not, what

relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(7)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 759/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Manu, Managing

Director, Quilon Foods Private Limited, QEE Cashew

Company, Modeenmukku, Kureeppally, Kollam and the

workmen of the above reffered establishment represented

by Sri D. John, Secretary, Kerala Cashew Staff Centre

CITU, CITU Bhavan, Kollam-691 001 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of employment to

Sri Mohanan Pillai Borma worker by the

management of QEE Cashew Company,

Kureeppally? If yes, what relief he is entitled to ?

(8)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 761/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Rehabilitation Plantations Limited, Punalur-691 305, Kollam

District and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary,

Government Rubber Plantation Thozhilali Union

A.I.T.U.C. (H. O.), Punalur in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

termination

of

Sri

Selvaraj

Reg. No. 5402, Permanent worker by the

management of Rehabilitation Plantation Limited,

Punalur is justifiable? If not, what relief he is

entitled to ?

(9)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 762/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri R. Mohanachandran

Nair, Proprietor, K1-24 B 3332 S/C, Prathibha,

Neeleswaram P. O., Kottarakkara and the workmen of the

above reffered establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Quilon District Motor & Mechanical Workers

Union, C.I.T.U. Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri R. Ratheesh, driver by the management

namely R. Mohanachandran Nair, Proprietor (K1-24

B 3332) Stage Carriage is justifiable or not ? If

not, what relief the worker is entitled to get ?

21st MAY 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

80

(10)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 763/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director,

Varuna Aqua Products Private Limited, Plot No. 43,

Kinfra Park, St. Xaviers College P.O., Thumba,

Thiruvananthapuram-695 586 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri S. Sreekumar,

Sankaravilasom, Chanthavila, Kattayikkonam P.O.,

Thiruvananthapuram-695 584 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of Sri S. Sreekumar, from the

service of Varuna Aqua Products Private Limited

by the management is justifiable ? If so, what are

the reliefs he is entitled to ?

(11)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 764/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Rado

Tyres Limited, A. M. Road, Nellikuzhi P. O.,

Kothamangalam-686 691 and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by (1) the Secretary,

Rado Tyres Employees Association (I.N.T.U.C.) C/o Rado

Tyres Limited, Nellikuzhi, Kothamangalam, (2) the General

Secretary, Rado Tyres Employees Union (C.I.T.U.),

A.K.G. Bhavan, Kothamangalam, (3) the Secretary

Ernakulam District Industrial Estate, Mazdoor Sangham

(B.M.S), C/o Rado Tyres Limited, Nellikuzhi,

Kothamangalam in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand for wages, revision etc. by the

employees represented by Rado Tyres Employees

Association, is justifiable or not ? The legal

validity of the bi-partite settlement signed by the

management & various trade unions on 3-9-2011 ?

Whether the bi-partite settlement is binding upon

to the employees representing Rado Tyres

Employees Association (INTUC-I) ? If not, what

are the reliefs the employees are entitled to ?

(12)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 765/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director,

Hantex Weavery Unit, Oottukuzhi, Thiruvananthapuram

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by Sri Kosalaramadas, President, All Kerala

Textiles Workers Staff Federation (Reg. No. 423/83),

Hantex Weavery Unit, Oottukuzhi, Thiruvananthapuram in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand for parity of DA exists in the

weavery unit to that exists in the garment unit is

justifiable ? If so, what are the reliefs they are

entitled to ?

(13)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 766/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director,

Mangalam Publications, S.H. Mount P.O., Kottayam and

the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Kottayam District

Shop & Other Establishments Mazdoor Sangh, B.M.S.

Office, T.B. Junction, M. L. Road, Kottayam in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

21st MAY 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

81

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the transfer of Smt. Manju Joseph, Subeditor

from Kottayam to Kozhikode by the Management

of Mangalam Publications is justifiable ? If not,

what relief she is entitled to ?

(14)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 767/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Chekmat

Security Services, Karakkamandapam, Thiruvananthapuram-27

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by (1) Kerala State Security Staff Association

(CITU), CITU District Committee Office, Chirakkulam,

G.P.O. (2) All Kerala Security Service Employees Association

(INTUC), Govt. Quarters No. B6 Nethaji Nagar, Vikas

Bhavan P.O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand for 20% Bonus to the Security

employees of Chekmat Security Services,

Karakkamandapam, Thiruvananthapuram is

justifiable ? If yes, what relief they are

entitled to ?

(15)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 768/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Director, Insight

Security Services & Facilities Private Limited

Punnakkamoodu, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of

the above referred establishment represented by (1) Kerala

State Security Staff Association (CITU), CITU District

Committee Office, Chirakkulam, G.P.O. (2) All Kerala Security

Service Employees Association (INTUC), Govt.

Quarters No. B6 Nethaji Nagar, Vikas Bhavan P.O.,

Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the Security employees of Insight Security

Services & Facilities Private Limited are eligible to

get 20% Bonus ? If yes, what relief they are

entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.