Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 770/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

industrial dispute exists between the Manager , Glenmary

Estate, Peermade and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Arpputham, C. R. No. 2154,

Glenmary Estate, Peermade represented by the General

Secretary, Kerala S tate Estate Workers Union (INTUC),

Peermade in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the action of the management in

superannuating Sri Arpputham, C. R. No. 2154 of

Glenmary Estate, Peermade with effect from

21-9-2011 instead of 22-3-2013 (date of birth as per

school records) is justifiable ? If not, what relief

he is entitled to ?

(2)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 771/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

No.

\º¿

Vol. I I

hmeyw 2

}

28th May 2013

2013 tabv 28

7th Jyaishta 1935

1935 tPyjvTw 7

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncph\¥]pcw, sNmΔ

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

28th M AY 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

Rehabilitation Plantations Limited,

Tholikkodu P. O.,

Punalur and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary ,

Kollam District, Plantation Workers Union, C.I.T .U.,

Punalur, in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure

to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Damodaran, Reg. No. 1477,

Tapping W orker

of Ayiranalloor

Estate

Rehabilitation Plantations Limited, Punalur is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is

entitled to get ?

(3)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 772/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director ,

Private Eye Security Services,

80 Feet Road, Indira Nagar ,

Bangalore and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by (1) Kerala State

Security S taff Association (CITU) , CITU District

Committee Office, Chirakkulam, G.. P. O., (2) All Kerala

Security Service Employees Association (INTUC),

Govt. Quarters No. B6, Nethaji Nagar , Vikas Bhavan P. O.,

Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand for 20% Bonus to the

Security employees of Private Eye Security

Services, Indira Nagar , Bangalore is Justifiable?

If yes, what releif they are entitled to?

(4)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 788/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

industrial dispute exists between S ri Roy, Veliyath House,

Veliyath Plantation, Pynkulam P .O., Cheruthuruthy, Thrissur

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri T. K. Sasi s/o Kuttappan,

Thattamparambil House,

Purappuzha P.O., Idukki in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order

;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of the employment to

Sri Sasi s/o Kuttappan, Thattamparambil House,

Purappuzha P.O., Idukki by employer Sri Roy

Veliyath House,

Veliyath Plantation P.O.,

Pynkulam, Cheruthuruthy is justifiable ? If not,

what are the relief he is entitled to

get ?

(5)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 789/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

industrial dispute exists between S ri Roy, Veliyath House,

Veliyath Plantation, Pynkulam P .O., Cheruthuruthy, Thrissur

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Jomon, K. P . s/o K. J. Philip, Kanjiramalayil House,

Puthuveli P . O., Kottayam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order

;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

28th M AY 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri K. P. Jomon s/o K. J. Philip, Kanjiramalayil

House, P. O. Puthuveli, Kottayam by employer

Sri Roy, Veliyath House, Veliyath Plantation,

Pynkulam P. O., Cheruthuruthy is justifiable ? If

not, what other relief he is entitled to get ?

(6)

G .O. (Rt.) No. 790/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th April 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

industrial dispute exists between S ri Roy, Veliyath House,

Veliyath Plantation, Pynkulam P .O., Cheruthuruthy, Thrissur

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Madhavan, K. S. s/o Sankunni, Kattil House,

Killimangalam P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order

;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of the employment to

Sri Madhavan s/o Sankunni, Kattil House,

Veliyath Plantation P. O., Pynkulam, Cheruthuruthy

is justifiable ? If not, what are the relief he is

entitled to get ?

By order of the Governor

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.