KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

23rd July 2013

2013 Pqsse 23

1st Sravana 1935

1935 {imhWw 1

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

30

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

}

}

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 958/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri G. Prabhakaran Nair,

Proprietor, Sree Krishna Cafe, Kadappakada, Kollam and

the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the General Secretary, Quilon District

Hotel and Workers Union AITUC, AITUC Council Office,

Kadappakada, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in

the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of employment to

Sri Arumukhan, worker by the proprietor, Sree

Krishna Cafe, Kollam ? If yes, what relief he is

entitled to ?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 959/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the President/Secretary,

Kozhikode District Co-operative Hospital, Erinjippalam,

Kozhikode and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Secretary, Kozhikode

District Security & Labour Contract Workers Union,

C.I.T.U., C.I.T.U. District Centre, S. K. Temple Road,

Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order ;

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether there is denial of employment to

8 Security Workers S/Shri A. K. Jagadeesh,

O. K. Chandran, K. P. Gopi, M. K. Mohanan,

N. Raveendran, P. Bhaskaran, P. C. Suresh,

Radhakrishnan by the Management of

Kozhikode District Co-operative Hospital

is justifiable ? If not, what relief they are

entitled to ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 960/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

State Farming Corporation of Kerala Limited, Vettithitta P. O.,

Alimukku, Punalur, Kollam-689 696 and the workmen of

the above referred establishment respresented by

(1) the General Secretary, State Farming Corporation

Rubber Plantation Workers Union (A.I.T.U.C.),

Pathanapuram (2) the General Secretary, State Farming

Corporation Workers Federation (C.I.T.U), Pathanapuram

(3) the General Secretary, State Farming Corporation Labour

Union (I.N.T.U.C.), Nehru Centre, Valakkode P. O., Punalur

(4) the General Secretary, State Farming Corporation

Workers Association, Pathanapuram P. O., Kollam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand of the tapping supervisor to

change their category from ‘worker category’

to ‘staff category’ is justifiable ? If yes, what

are the benefits they are entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 961/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the President,

Pathanapuram Service Co-operative BanK Limited,

No. 3656, Pathanapuram (2) the Secretary (representing

the employer), Pathanapuram Service Co-operative Bank

Limited, No. 3656, Pathanapuram and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri Sivadasan Pillai, P.,

Vaishnavam, Panthaplavu P. O., Pattazhi-691 522 in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismisal of Sri Sivadasan Pillai,

Pharmacist of Neethi Medical Store, owned by

Pathanapuram Service Co-operative Bank,

Pathanapuram is justifiable or not? If not,

what relief he is entitled to get ?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 962/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Hassan Noushad,

Proprietor, KL 2Z 7383, Punchiri Travels, Punnaram

Nellettil Poothakkulam P. O., Paravur and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Quilon District Motor & Mechanical

Workers Union, C.I.T.U. Bhavan, Kollam in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether denial of employment to Sri Shibi Netto,

by the management namely Hassan Noushad,

Proprietor KL 2 Z 7383 Stage Carriage is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the

worker is entitled to get ?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 963/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between Dr. B. Gopinath,

Janaki Hospital, Kadakkavoor and the workman of the

above referred establishment Smt. Sajna, Altharakunnu

Puthen Veedu, Perumkulam P. O., Mananakku, Attingal in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of Employment of

Smt. R. Sajna from the service of the Janaki

Hospital, Kadakkavoor is justifiable? If not,

what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 964/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri S. Kesavadas,

Proprietor, Latha Cashew Factory, Maruthurkulangara

Thekku, Alumkadavu P. O., Karunagappally and the

workmen of the above referred establishment represented

by Sri D. Babu, General Secretary, Karunagappally Taluk

Cashewnut Workers Union (C.I.T.U.), (Register No. 67/

1124), Puthen Theruvu P. O., Karunagappally in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demand of the Union for

appointment of five workers as permananent

workers in Rosting and Borma section in Latha

Cashew Factory, Maruthurkulangara South,

Alumkadavu, Karunagappally is justifiable?

(8)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 965/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director,

P. R. S. College of Engineering & Technology, Paliyode,

Dalummukham P. O., Neyyattinkara and the workman of

the above referred establishment Sri N. R. Vijayananth,

Sagaram, T.C. 53/1877 (1), Malika Veedu Lane, Nemom P. O.

in respect of matters mentioned in the Annexure to this

order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri N. R. Vijayananth by the management of

P. R. S. College of Engineering and

Technology, Paliyode is justifiable ? If not,

what are the relief he is entitled to ?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 968/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 1st June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Lekshman

Cashew Company, Keralapuram, Kollam and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by

Sri K. R. V. Sahajan, General Secretary, Kerala Cashew

Thozhilali Congress, I. N. T. U. C., Congress Bhavan,

Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the Annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the action of the management of Lekshman

Cashew Company, Keralapuram, Kollam not

complying the decision of the Cashew Industrial

Relations Committee with regard to Bonus for the

year 2012 is justifiable ? If not, what are the

reliefs entitled ?

(10)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 972/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Manager, Harrison

Malayalam Limited, Valardi Estate, Dymukku P. O.,

Vandiperiyar, Idukki District and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri K. Gopalan, C. R. No.

3207, Worker, Valardi Estate, Dymukku P. O., Vandiperiyar,

Idukki District in respect of matters mentioned in the

Annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri K. Gopalan

(C. R. No. 3207) worker of the Valardi Estate,

Vandiperiyar by the management is justifiable ? If

not, what relief he is entitled to ?

(11)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 973/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director,

Sahi Rubbers India Limited, Nochima, N.A.D.P.O,

Aluva-683 563 and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the (1) The Unit President,

Ernakulam District Industrial Estate Mazdoor Sangh

(B.M.S.), B.M.S. Office, Pump Junction, Aluva (2) The

President, Ernakulam District Industrial Labour

Association, I.N.T.U.C.I., Congress House, Palace Road,

Aluva in respect of matters mentioned in the Annexure to

this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the charter of demands dated 7-6-2012

submitted by Ernakulam District Industrial

Mazdoor Sangh is justifiable ? If yes, what is

the quantum of benefits ? Whether the lockout

of M/s. Sahi Rubbers India Ltd., Nochima,

Edathala by the Management during the course of

conciliation is justifiable ? If not, What relief the

workers are entitled to ?

(12)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 974/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Sri Rajab, Proprietor,

Navajeevan Advertising Company, SKP Building, Beach

Road, Kollam and the workman of the above referred

establishment Smt. Shirly Alex, Smrithi, Srinagar-50,

Kadappakada, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in

the Annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The

Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of

three months

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Smt. Shirly Alex by the management of

Navajeevan Advertising Company, Beach Road,

Kollam is justifiable ? If not, What relief the

worker is entitled to get ?

(13)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 976/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Thankamala

Estate, Vandiperiyar P. O., Peermade and the workman of

the above referred establishment represented by the

Sri Gopal Raj, C. R. No. 2818, Thankamala Estate,

Vandiperiyar P. O., Peermade in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam.

The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of

three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri Gopal Raj

(C. R. No. 2818) field worker of Thankamala

Estate, Vandiperiyar, by the management is

justifiable? If not, what relief he is

entitled to?

(14)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 977/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Sasidharan Pillai,

Proprietor, KL-2 Q 7767, Chindhu Motors, Pulickal Veedu,

Umayanallur P. O., Kollam and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Quilon District Motor and Mechanical Workers

Union, C.I.T.U. Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri H. M. Hashir, Driver, K. L. 2 Q 7767, Chindhu

Motors by the management is justifiable or not?

If not, what relief the worker is entitled to get?

(15)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 978/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri P. Jayaprakash,

Proprietor, S. N. Auditorium, Krishnapuram, Neyyattinkara

and the workman of the above referred establishment

Sri D. Theppanose, Alaykkattukonam, Parayanvilakom,

Vandithadam, Karakkonam P. O. in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment and Bonus for

the year 2012 to Sri D. Theppanose, Cleaner by

the management of S. N. Auditorium,

Neyyattinkara is justifiable? If not, what are the

reliefs he is entitled to?

(16)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 979/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation,

Venjaramoodu and the workman of the above referred

establishment Sri Shajeer, A., Thadatharikathu Veedu,

Mannamkonam, Puthukulangara P. O., Nedumangadu in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Shajeer, A.,

Lab Technician by the management of

Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research

Foundation, Venjaramoodu is justifiable?

If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to?

(17)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 980/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 4th June 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

United Spirits Limited Division, Varanadu P. O., Cherthalai

and the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by (1) the General Secretary, Macdowel and

High Range Breweries Workers Union (I. N. T. U. C.),

Reg. No. 164/73, Varanadu P. O., Cherthalai, (2) the

Secretary, Macdowel and High Range Breweries Employees

Union (C. I. T. U. ), Varanadu P. O., Cherthalai in respect

of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha.

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the charter of demands submitted by the

Union in respect of Canteen and Club Workers of

United Spirits Limited, Varanadu, Cherthalai is

justifiable? If so, what are the benefits entitled to

them?

By order of the Governor,

RAMANKUTTY, C.,

Under Secretary to Government.