KERALA GAZETTE
tIcf Kkddv
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv
©
Government of Kerala
tIcf k¿°m¿
2013
No.
\º¿
Vol. II
hmeyw 2
29th October 2013
2013 HIvtSm-_¿ 29
7th Karthika 1935
1935 Im¿ØnIw 7
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ
43
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073
dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. cPn. \º¿
KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
}
}
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1497/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 27th August 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
Smt. Shelli Mohandas, Manager/Principal, WIZ-KIDS, Play
Group Day Care, Kadappakkada Nagar No. 6, Kollam,
Pin-691 008 and the workmen of the above referred
establishment represented by the General Secretary, Quilon
Shops & Establishment Employees Union (INTUC),
Mundakkal, Kollam-691 001 in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment of Smt. Valliyamma,
Aya, WIZ-KIDS, Play Group Day Care,
Kadappakkada Nagar-6, Kollam-8 by the
Management WIZ-KIDS, Play Group Day Care,
Kadappakkada
Nagar-6,
Kollam-8
is
justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled
to get?
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 1527/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 31st August 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
Sri Narayan Bharathan, Proprietor, M/s Malayalam
Exporting Enterprises, 237, Shalimar, Vrindhavan Nagar,
Kadapakkada P. O., Kollam-691 008 and the workmen of
the above referred establishment represented by the
(1)
Sri S. Radhakrishnan, General Secretary, Kashuvandi
Thozhilali Center, Mullasseri Bunglaw, Perumpuzha P. O.,
Kollam, (2)
Sri B. Sujeendran, Secretary, C.I.T.U.,
Malayalam
Exporting
Enterprises
Cashew
Factory, Punnamukku, Perumpuzha P. O., Kollam,
(3)
Sri S. C. Abhilash, A.I.T.U.C. Secretary, Malayalam
Exporting Enterprises Cashew Factory, Punnamukku,
Perumpuzha P. O., Kollam, (4)
Sri Sasidharan,
U.T.U.C. Secretary, Malayalam Exporting Enterprises
Cashew Factory, Punnamukku, Perumpuzha P. O., Kollam,
(5)
Sri Sreenivasan, I.N.T.U.C. Secretary, Malayalam
Exporting Enterprises Cashew Factory, Punnamukku,
Perumpuzha P. O., Kollam in respect of matters mentioned
in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the action of the management of
Malayalam Exporting Enterprises Cashew
Company locking out the factory is justifiable ?
If not, what are the reliefs entitled to ?
(3)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1529/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 31st August 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that the
industrial dispute exists between the President, Murukady
Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangam Ltd. No. 144(D)
APCOS, Murukady P.O., (Via.) Kumali, Idukki-685 535
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri P. N. Sadasivan Pillai, Palakkal House, Vallardi P. O.
Vandipperiyar, Idukki in respect of matters mentioned in
the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three
months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of from service of
Sri P. N. Sadasivan Pillai, Milk Collector of
Murukady Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangam
Ltd. No. 144(D) APCOS, Murukady P.O., Idukki
(Dist.) is justifiable or not; if not, what relief the
worker is entitled to.
(4)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1538/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the
Manager, Vanchiyoor Co-operative Society Ltd. No. 1115,
Vanchiyoor, Thiruvananthapuram and the workmen of the
above
referred
establishment
represented
by
Sri M. Rajashekaran Nair, Secretary, Kerala State
Co-operative Employees Sangh, Reg. No. 187/84,
Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Smt. Aruna, S. K., Smt. Priya, K. S. and
Sri K. Chandran from the service of Vanchiyoor
Co-operative Society Ltd. No. 1115 by its
management is justifiable ? If not, what are the
reliefs they are entitled to?
(5)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1553/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the
Managing Director, S. K. Hospital, Edapazhinji,
Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above
referred establishment represented by Prof. T. N. Raman Pillai
(Working President) Thiruvananthapuram District Private
Hospital Employees Union (CITU), T. C. 2/1203, P.R.A.-97,
K. K. Line, Pottakkuzhi, Thiruvananthapuram-2 in respect
of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Smt. P. Ammini, ANM Staff, S. K. Hospital,
Thiruvananthapuram by the management is
justifiable? If not, what are the reliefs she is
entitled to?
(6)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1556/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
Sri. Suresh M. Pilla, Proprietor, City Fuels, Indian Oils
Dealers, Mannanthala, Thiruvananthapuram and the
workman of the above referred establishment represented
by Sri. Rajendran, General Secretary, Motor & Engineering
Mazdoor
Sangh,
B.M.S.
Bhavan,
Karamana,
Thiruvananthapuram-2 in respect of matters mentioned in
the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the termination of employment to
Sri. K. Sajeevkumar, Pump Operator by the
management of City Fuels, Mannanthala is
justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs he is
entitled to?
(7)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1557/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the
Managing Director, S. S. Hundai, Authorised Dealer,
Opp. C.S.I. Church, Mitchel Junction, Mavelikara and the
workmen of the above referred establishment represented
by the General Secretary, Automobile Showroom and
Service Employees Union (A.I.T.U.C.), Reg. No. 3-9-2012,
Chadayammuri Smarakam Opp. District Court, Alappuzha
in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to
this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Sri. Ajithkumar, K. and
Sri. Maneesh, V. S., Sales Executives, S. S. Hundai,
Mavelikara by the management is justifiable?
If not, what are the reliefs they are entitled to?
(8)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1561/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Chairman,
KMM Hospital, Puthanpally, Perumpadappu P. O.,
Malappuram-679 580 and the worker of the above referred
establishment Smt. Mridula, P., Vattekkattu House,
Mangad P. O., Pazhanji (Via.), Thrissur in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Smt. Mridula, P., X-ray Technician, by the
management of KMM Hospital, Puthanpally is
justifiable? If not, what is the remedy?
By order of the Governor,
RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,
Under Secretary to Government.