KERALA GAZETTE
tIcf Kkddv
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv
©
Government of Kerala
tIcf k¿°m¿
2013
No.
\º¿
Vol. II
hmeyw 2
19th November 2013
2013 \hw-_¿ 19
28th Karthika 1935
1935 Im¿ØnIw 28
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY
Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ
46
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073
dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
Reg. No. cPn. \º¿
KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14
}
}
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1554/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
Sri Paul Wilson, Regional Manager, Regional Office,
Kosamattom
Finance
Ulloor,
Pongummoodu,
Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above
referred establishment Sri M. Manoharan, Sarvasree,
Karichal, Kazhuvoor P. O. Thiruvananthapuram in respect
of
matters
mentioned
in
the
annexure
to
this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Sri M. Manoharan, Manager, Kosamattom Finance
Limited, Balaramapuram Branch by the management
is justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs he is
entitled to ?
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
(2)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1555/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 4th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
the Proprietor, Krishna Traders, Balaramapuram,
Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the
above referred establishment
Sri D. N. Jayakumar,
D. N. Nivas, Moovalloorkonam, Naruvamoodu P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the
annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Sri D. N. Jayakumar by the management of
Krishna Traders, Balaramapuram, Thiruvanantha-
puram district is justifiable ? If not, what are the
reliefs he is entitled to ?
(3)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1613/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 11th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that
an industrial dispute exists between the Managing
Director, Elasto Tapes Kochuveli, Thiruvananthapuram
and the worker of the above referred establishment
Smt. Rajitha, R., Kattil Veedu, Thekkumbhagam,
Kadakkavoor P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
termination
of
service
of
Smt. R. Rajitha by the management of Elasto
Tapes, Kochuveli, Thiruvananthapuram is
justifiable ? If not, what are the relief she
is entitled to ?
(4)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1625/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 12th September 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between Sri A. V. Varu,
Proprietor, Fashion Offset Printers, Pallikkulam Road,
Thrissur-1 and the worker of the above referred
establishment Smt. Radha, P., W/o. Vellalath Sunil Kumar,
Anakkad, Kanjani P. O., Thrissur-680 612 in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Smt. Radha, P. by the employer (Fashion
Offset Printers, Pallikkulam Road, Thrissur-1)
is justifiable ? If not, what relief she is
entitled to get?
(5)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1706/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 5th October 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
(1) Sri M. K. Murali, S/o Kannan, Maruthoor House,
Vadavanoor, Chittur, Palakkad (2) Sri M. A. Titto,
S/o Antony, Muyalan House, Varantharapilli P. O.
Mukundapuram Taluk, Thrissur (3) Sri A. U. Abdul Hakim,
Perutheni Street, Puthunagaram, Palakkad and the workmen
of the above referred establishment represented by the
Secretary, District Motor Transport Employees Union
(CITU), Mettupalayam Street, Palakkad in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial
Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
(1) Sri M. Manikandan, Driver, (2) Sri R. Sajeev,
Conductor, KL-09/P-3045 Bus, Murali Bus Service
by the management is justifiable or not, If not,
what relief they are entitled to?
(6)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1751/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 11th October 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that
an
industrial
dispute
exists
between
the President, Kannur Co-operative Urban Bank Limited
No. 1534, Kannur-2 and the workman of the above
referred establishment represented by the Secretary, Kerala
Co-operative Employees Front, Kannur Taluk Committee,
Kannur-2 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure
to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1.
Whether Sri Suneesh, working as appraiser in
Kannur Co-operative Urban Bank is eligible to
get the Pay Scale of Junior Clerk with effect
from 1-1-2006 ?
2.
If he is eligible what is the quantum of monetary
benefits he may deserve from the management ?
(7)
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1752/2013/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 11th October 2013.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the
Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Hospital
Complex & Centre for Advanced Medical Services,
Pariyaram, Kannur and the workman of the above referred
establishment Sri C. M. Rajesh s/o P. Raghavan,
Kaara P. O., Peravoor, Kannur in respect of matters
mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the
denial
of
employment
to
Sri C. M. Rajesh, Nursing Assistant by the
management of Kerala State Co-operative
Hospital Complex & Centre for Advanced Medical
Services, Pariyaram with effect from 20-1-2008 is
justifiable or not? If not, what relief the worker
is entitled to?
By order of the Governor,
RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,
Under Secretary to Government.