PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1656/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Dr . M. L. Ajithkumar,

Proprietor, Mediguard Pharmaceuticals, Rasalpuram P . O.,

Thiruvananthapuram-695 501 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Sri S. Chandran, Kumara

Sadanam, Aluvila, Balaramapuram in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order

;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government

it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri S. Chandran from the service of Mediguard

Pharmaceuticals, Rasalpuram P

. O., (V ia)

Balaramapuram by its Management is justifiable ?

If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to

?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1657/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 25th September 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Regional Manager ,

Kerala State Consumer Fed, Triveni Tower, Thookkukulam,

Paravoor P. O., Alappuzha and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri S. Sasikumar , Shyam Nivas,

Kakkazham P. O., Ambalappuzha in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order

;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government

it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

KERALA GAZETTE

tIcf Kkddv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

No.

\º¿

Vol. II

hmeyw 2

26th November 2013

2013 \hw_¿ 26

5th Agrahayana 1935

1935 A{K-lmb\w 5

47

}

}

©

Government of Kerala

tIcf k¿°m¿

2013

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. cPn. \º¿

KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

26th NOV. 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

170

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Sri S. Sasikumar, Security S taff Consumer Fed

(Fl Shop No. 60) Ambalappuzha by the Regional

Manager, Kerala S tate Consumer Fed, Triveni

Tower, Thookkukulam, Paravoor P. O., Alappuzha

is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to

?.

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1702/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that

an industrial dispute exists between the Secretary ,

Sivagiri Sreenarayana Medical Hospital,

Varkala,

Thiruvananthapuram-695 141 and the workman

of the above referred establishment respresented by the

President, Thiruvananthapuram District Private Hospital

Employees Union, CITU, T.C. 2/1203, PRA-97, Pottakuzhi,

Thiruvananthapuram-14 in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order

;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government

it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the withholding of five increments of

Sri K.

S. Madhu, Pharmacist of Sivagiri

Sreenarayana Medical Mission Hospital with

cumulative effect and the treating suspension

period as Leave without allowance are

justifiable ? If not, what are the reliefs he is

entitled to ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1705/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 5th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) the Corparate Manager ,

St. Luis L. P . School, 35th Mile, Mundakayam P . O.,

Idukki District, (2) the Headmaster/Mistress (Convenor ,

Parents and Teachers Association) St. Luis L. P . School,

35th Mile, Mundakayam P . O., Idukki District and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. Jainamma Paulose (Mariyamma Paulose),

Thalapunchayil, 34th Mile, Mundakayam East P . O., Idukki

District, represented by Sri K. N. Krishnakumar , Krishna

Bhavanam, Chunakkara Kizhakku, Chunakkara P . O.,

Alappuzha (State Patron, State School Pachaka Thozhilali

Samyuktha Sankhadana) in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government

it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peerumade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Jainamma Paulose (Mariamma Paulose)

Cook, St. Luis L. P . School, Mundakayam with

effect from 11-6-2008 is justifiable or not

? If not,

what are the relief she is entitled to

?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1720/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director ,

Quilon Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, ST (6)

Karamcode P. O., Kollam, Kerala-691 579 and the workmen

of the above referred establishment represented by the

General Secretary, Co-operative Spinning Mill Employees

and Workers Front, Karamcode, Chathanoor , Kollam in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

26th NOV. 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

171

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the action of the Management of the

Quilon Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited,

Karamcode, Kollam is not giving promotion to

Sri Thampyraj, Card No. 821 to Clearing Gang is

justifiable ? If not, what are the relief he is

entitled to?

(6)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1721/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director ,

Sunmetal Caps, K. C. Sakariya and Company

,

Mundankavu, Chenganoor and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Moni (Atmaram), S/o Surendran,

Nalledath House, Kalavoor P . O., Alappuzha in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to Sri Moni

(Atmaram) by the Managing Director , Sunmetal

Caps, Chenganoor is justifiable ? If not, what is

the relief he is entitled to?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1724/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri R. Hareesh, M. D.,

T. V. Sundaram Ayyankar & Sons Limited, West Veli

Street, Madhurai-625 001, Sri K. R. Pandala, Chairman,

Mahatma Gandhi Charitable Society , T.C. 8/52, Lekshmi

Vihar, Thirumala P. O., Thiruvananthapuram and

the worker of the above referred establishment

Smt. Sudhakumari, S., Dhanya Bhavanam, Chamundi

Padinjattathil, Mangad P. O., Kollam in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour

Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment to

Smt. Sudhakumari, S., Cleaner , with ef fect

from 29-10-2011 by the employers namely

Sri R. Hareesh, M. D., T. V. Sundaram Ayyankar

& Sons Limited, West Veli Street, Mudhurai-

625 001 and the Chairman, Mahatma Gandhi

Charitable Society, T.C. 8/52, Lekshmi Vihar,

Thirumala P . O., Thiruvananthapuram is

justifiable or not ? If not, what relief the workmen

is entitled to get ?

(8)

G.. O. (Rt.) No. 1723/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) The Manager, Gramby

Estate, Vandiperiyar P. O., Idukki, (2) Group Manager Pobs

Enterprises (Pvt.) Limited, Vandiperiyar P. O., Idukki and

the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by the Secretary , Kerala Plantation Workers

Union (INTUC) (Reg. No. 06/05/1998) Central Office,

Peerumade P. O., Idukki District, Pin-685 501 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

26th NOV. 2013]

KERALA GAZETTE

172

adjudication to Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peerumade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of employment in the permanent

cadre as worker to Smt. K. Baby (C. R. No. 1425)

by the management of Gramby Estate,

Vandiperiyar with ef fect from September 2010

is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief she is

entitled to?

(9)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1722/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 8th October 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Group Manager , RBT

Limited, Kozhikkanam Estate, P .B. No. 4, Elappara, Idukki

District, Pin-685 501 and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Arul Raj, C. R. No. 4203,

Kozhikkanam Estate Division No. 1, Elappara, Idukki

District, Pin-685 501 in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes

Act of

1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for

adjudication to Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peerumade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a

period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the dismissal of Sri

Arul Raj,

C. R., No. 4203, worker of Kozhikkanam Estate,

Elappara by the management is justifiable or

not ? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to?

By order of the Governor,

RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,

Under Secretary to Government