©

tIcf k¿°m¿

Government of Kerala

2014

tIcf Kkddv

KERALA GAZETTE

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

Xncph\¥]pcw,

sNmΔ

Thiruvananthapuram,

Tuesday

hmeyw 3

Vol. III

2014 P\p-hcn 7

7th January 2014

1189 [\p 23

23rd Dhanu 1189

1935 s]ujw 17

17th Pousha 1935

1

\º¿

No.

}

}

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1868/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Aboobacker, V. K.,

Managing Director, M/s Safty Foods Pvt. Limited, Thirur

Road, Kottakkal P. O., Malappuram-676 503

(2) Sri Abdul Raszak (Partner), M/s Safty Foods Pvt.

Limited, Vettanam Kadavathu House, Kanmmanam P. O.,

Kalpakacheri Via., Malappuram (3) Sri V. P. Saidalikutty

Haji (Partner), M/s Safty Foods Pvt. Limited, Vaaniyam

Peediyakkal House, Kanjippura P. O., Malappuram and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri Santhiprakash, P., Palapparambil House, Padinjattummuri

P. O., Koottilangadi Via., Malappuram-676 506 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kozhikode.

The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Santhiprakash, P., Area Sales Officer, by the

management of M/s. Safty Foods Pvt. Limited,

Kottakkal is justifiable ? If not, what is the

remedy ?

(2)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1869/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Biju s/o Rajappan,

Puthukkadan House, Puthenvelikkara, North Paravoor,

(2) Sri Mathew s/o Cheekku, Kaimathuruthy House,

Puthenvelikkara, North Paravoor, (3) Sri Apream

s/o Thachankunji Vareethu, Poyya, Kodungalloor and the

workman of the above referred establishment

Sri K. G. Suresh s/o Govindankutty, Kuttichira House,

Ancheri P. O., Pin-680 006 in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the transfer of Sri K. G. Suresh, Worker,

T. S. No. 26, Kurichikkara to Kaiparambu Toddy

Shop is justifiable ? If not, what remedy he is

entitled to get?

(3)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1888/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th November 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

Malappuram Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited,

P. B. No. 206, Down Hill P. O., Malappuram-676 519 and

the workmen of the above referred establishment

represented by the (1) General Secretary, Malappuram

Spinning Mills Employees Congress (INTUC), Pattarkadavu

P. O., Malappuram-676 519, (2) General Secretary,

Malappuram Spinning Mills Employees Union (CITU),

Pattarkadavu P. O., Malappuram- 676 519, (3) General

Secretary, Malappuram Spinning Mills Employees

Organization (STU), Pattarkadavu P. O, Malappuram-676 519

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal

will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the non payment of Bonus for the year

2011-12 by the management, Malappuram

Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited is

justifiable ? If not, what is remedy ?

(4)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1889/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 15th November 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the General Manager,

Sri Padmabalaji Alloys (P) Limited, 308/1, New Industrial

Development Area, Menonpara Road, Kanjikode, Palakkad-

678 621 and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by Sri S. B. Biju, General

Secretary, Palakkad Taluk Engineering & Industrial General

Workers Union (CITU), Puthusserry P. O., Palakkad-7 in

respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad.

The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Smt.

Stella

Amalu

Mary,

Employees,

Sri Padmabalaji Alloys (P) Limited, Kanjikode,

Palakkad by the management is justfiable or not;

if not, what relief she is entitled to ?

(5)

G . O. (Rt.) No. 1916/2013/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd November 2013.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,

S. S. Hyundai, Mavelikara and the workmen of the above

referred establishment represented by the General

Secretary, Automoblie Showroom and Services Employees

Union (AITUC), Chadayammuri Smarakam, Opposite

District Court, Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned

in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam.

The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

to

Sri Manoj Kumar, Dentor, S. S. Hyundai Unit,

Mavelikkara and to Smt. L. Ambili, Office Staff of

Hyundai Unit, Kayamkulam by the management

S. S. Hyundai Mavelikkara is justifiable ? If not,

what are the reliefs they are entitled to ?

By order of the Governor,

RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,

Under Secretary to Government.