©

tIcf k¿°m¿

Government of Kerala

2014

tIcf Kkddv

KERALA GAZETTE

B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073

dated 5-9-2012 with RNI

Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2012-14

Xncph\¥]pcw,

sNmΔ

Thiruvananthapuram,

Tuesday

hmeyw 3

Vol. III

2014 sk]v‰w-_¿ 23

23rd September 2014

1190 I∂n 7

7th Kanni 1190

1936 Bizn\w 1

1st Aswina 1936

37

\º¿

No.

}

}

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1064/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

Industrial dispute exists between Sri. S. Loganayagam,

General Manager, Visudira Impex Private Limited,

No. XI/130-C, K.P. Road, Palakkadavu, Near S.P.M.

Auditorium, Kilikolloor, Kollam-691 004 and the worker

of the above referred establishment Smt. Prameela Sudheer,

Mithun Cottage, Valathungal P.O., Kollam in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

Employment

of

Smt. Prameela Sudheer, Accountant in M/s. Visudira

Impex Private Limited by the management of Visudira

Impex Private Limited is justifiable ? If not what relief

she is entitled to get ?

(2)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1067/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

Industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Express

Publications (Madurai) Limited (The New Indian Express),

Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-17 and the worker of the

above referred establishment Smt. S. Sarojini, House

No. 54/2083, Plot No. 37, Kudumbi Colony, Kochi-20

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

ii

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wages to Smt. S. Sarojini according

to various wage board recommendation is justifiable

or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(3)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1068/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

Industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Express

Publications (Madurai) Limited (The New Indian Express),

Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-17 and the worker of the

above referred establishment Smt.M.K. Hymavathy,

Karathattuparambu Manakkattu Veedu, Chittur Road, Near

Semitheri, Kochi-18 in respect of matters mentioned in the

annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wages to Smt. M.K. Hymavathy

according to various wage board recommendation is

justifiable or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is

entitled to ?

(4)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1070/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

Industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Express

Publications (Madurai) Limited (The New Indian Express),

Express House, Kaloor, Kochi-17 and the worker of the

above referred establishment Smt. K.K. Thankamma,

Panakkal Veedu, Nadakkavu P.O., Udayamperoor

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said Industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of wages to Smt. K.K. Thankamma

according to various wage board recommendation is

justifiable or not? If not, what are the reliefs she is

entitled to ?

(5)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1072/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists betwee The Manager, Su and Park

Institutions Private Limited, Near N.S.S. Hospital,

Edappally P.O., Kochi-682 024 and the workman of the

above referred establishment Kum. P. K. Nadeera,

Pallithottam Veettil, Kollamkodi mugal, Thrikkakkara P.O.,

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of Employment to Kum. P. K. Nadeera,

by the management of Su and Park Institutions Private

Limited, Edappally is justifiable or not? If not, what

are the reliefs she is entitled to ?

(6)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1073/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between the H.R. Manager,

G4S-Secure Solutions (India) Private Limited,

House No. 34/259, N.H. Bypass, Jawan Road, Edappally,

Ernakulam and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the Chief Patron, All Kerala

Security Services Employees Association, INTUC, Labour

Port Office, Ernakulam North, Kalabhavan Road, Kochin-18

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

iii

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will

pass the award within a period three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the transfer of Sri Joshwa, C.J. by the

management of G4S-Secure Solutions (India) Private

Limited, House No. 34/259, N.H. Bypass, Jawan Road,

Edappally, Ernakulam and subsequently denying

employment at Ernakulam is justifiable or not? If not,

what are the relief he is entitled to?

(7)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1083/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between The Manager,

Sri Sankara Vidyalaya, Kizhakkenada, Vaikom-686 141 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

Smt. Ambika Devi, C., Sivatheertham, Kizhakkenada,

Vaikom P.O., Kottayam-686 141 in respect of matters

mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade).

The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period

of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the denial of Employment to Smt. Ambika Devi, C.

Clerk with effect from 13-5-2013 by the management of

Sri Sankara Vidyalaya Vaikom is justifiable ?

If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ?

(8)

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1084/2014/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 11th August 2014.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Thomaskutty,

Proprietor, May Fair Pharma, Pharmaceutical Distributors,

Plavaramukalil Building, Door No. K.P.3/1506, Pulamon,

Kottarakkara, Kollam and the workman of the above

referred establishment Sri Aloysious Gonsalvez,

Bright House, Kripa Nagar-35, Kottarakkara P.O.

in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass

the award within a period three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether

the

denial

of

employment

of

Sri Aloysious Gonsalvez, Medicine Supplier, May Fair

Pharma, Pulamon, Kottarakkara by the employer is

justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get ?

By order of the Governor,

RAJANIKANT R. BALIGA,

Under Secretary to Government.