Labour and Skills Department
Labour and Skills (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 743/2018/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 22nd June 2018.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
PVS Memorial Hospital Private Limited, Ernakulam, Kaloor,
Kochi-682 017 and the workman of the above referred
establishment Sri Subash V. Rajan s/o V. K. Rajan,
Velipparambil House, Shine Road, Vyttila, Ernakulam in
respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether
the termination of employment
to
Sri Subash V. Rajan, Night Receptionist,
PVS Memorial Hospital Private Limited, Ernakulam
by the management of PVS Memorial Hospital
Private Limited, Ernakulam is justifiable or not? If
not what are the reliefs he is entitled to get?
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Gaz. No. 30/2018/DTP (Part I).
7
Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2018-20
Xncph\¥]pcw,
sNmΔ
Thiruvananthapuram,
Tuesday
30
\º¿
No.
2018 Pqsse 24
24th July 2018
1193 I¿°-SIw 8
8th Karkadakam 1193
1940 {imhWw 2
2nd Sravana 1940
tIcf Kkddv
KERALA GAZETTE
B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
}
Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073
dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
©
tIcf k¿°m¿
Government of Kerala
2018
hmeyw 7
Vol. VII }
108
KERALA GAZETTE
[PART I
(2)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 771/2018/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 28th June 2018.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between (1) The Regional Manager,
Naveen Security Service, A.K.G. Nagar, Panchami House
(House No. 105), Pangappara P. O., Thiruvananthapuram
(2) The Chief Security Officer, Technopark, Park Centre,
Kazhakkuttom, Kazhakkuttom P. O., Thiruvananthapuram
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri N. Jyothi Basu, Ambika Bhavan, T.C. 80/2978,
Madhavapuram, Veli TTP—P. O., Thiruvananthapuram-21
in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this
order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will
pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
The denial of employment to Sri N. Jyothibasu,
Security
Supervisor
at
Technopark,
Thiruvananthapuram employed through Naveen
Security Services by its Management is
justifiable? If not what relief he is entitled to get?
(3)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 772/2018/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 28th June 2018.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between Sri Aneesh Rajendran,
Proprietor, Kairalkadai, Kaithamukku, Petta P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram-695 074 and the workman of the
above referred establishment Sri B. Narayanapillai,
Aneesh Bhavan, Cheeranikkara, Cheeranikkara P. O.,
Vembayam, Thiruvananthapuram-695 615 in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employments and service
benefits to Sri B. Narayanapillai, Cashier at
Kairalkadai, Kaithamukku by its management is
justifiable? If not what reliefs he is entitled to
get?
(4)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 773/2018/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 28th June 2018.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
Kerala State Farming Corporation Ltd., Vettithitta P. O.,
Piravanthur, Alimukku, Punalur-689 696 and the workmen
of the above referred establishment represented by
Sri P. S. Cheriyan, General Secretary, Plantation Employees
Union (C.I.T.U.), C.I.T.U. Office, Punalur P. O. in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The
Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the repeated disciplinary proceedings taken
against Sri Sundaran, Field Officer by the
management, Kerala State Farming Corporation,
Punalur amounts to unfair labour practice and
victimisation? If yes, what relief the worker is
entitled to?
(5)
G. O. (Rt.) No. 775/2018/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 28th June 2018.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director,
G4S Secure Solutions (India) Private Limited, Anupama,
T.C. 16/1800, Kukkiliyar Lane, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram
and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri N. K. Suresh, Pottakkaravila Veedu, Thalayil,
Aralummoodu P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct
that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication
to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass
the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment and service
benefits to Sri N. K. Suresh, Security Guard at
G4S Secure Solutions (India) Private Limited by
its management is justifiable? If not what relief he
is entitled to get?
By order of the Governor,
LOLA, P.,
Deputy Secretary to Government.
8