126

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 February 2011

This case coming on 12-11-2010 in the presence of

Thiru P. Muthukrishnan, advocate for the petitioner, and the

respondent being called absent and set ex parte, and on

hearing the petitioner, and on perusing the case records, this

court passed the following:

AWARD

This industrial dispute arises out of the reference made by

the Government under section 10(l)(c) of the Industrial

Disputes Act in G.O.Rt.No. 147/AIL/Lab/J/2008 , dated 18-9-2008

in and by which the following references were made to this

court for adjudication.

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Tmt. G. Veeramani

Dania against the management of M/s. Nallathur

Co-operative Milk Society Ltd., Nallathur, Karaikal over

non-employment is justified or not?

(b) To what relief, Tmt. G. Veeramani Dania is entitled to ?

money, if it can be so computed?

2. Order passed. As the petitioner has proved her claim

through the Ex.P. 1 to Ex.P.8, the award is passed directing the

respondent to reinstate the petitioner forthwith without back

wages but with continuity of service. No costs.

Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this

the 20th day of November 2010.

R. MARGARET ROSALINE,

Presiding Officer, Labour Court,

Karaikal.

————

List of witnesses examined by the petitioner :

PW1—G. Veeramani Dania

List of exhibits marked by the petitioner :

Ex.P1— Office order, dated 30-6-1995 issued to the

petitioner by the respondent society.

Ex.P2—Proceedings of the respondent, dated 0-10-1998

Ex.P3—Notice, dated 13-12-2007 issued by the

respondent.

Ex.P4—Explanation by the petitioner, dated 4-1-2008.

Ex.P5—Xerox copy of reply given by the petitioner,

dated 18-1-2008.

Ex.P6—Letter by petitioner to the Conciliation

Officer, dated 13-2-2008.

Ex.P7—Letter by the respondent to the Conciliation

Officer, dated 28-5-2008

Ex.P8—Failure report, dated 9-7-2008.

R. MARGARET ROSALINE,

Presiding Officer, Labour Court,

Karaikal.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 20/AIL/Lab./J/2011, dated 3rd February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that

an industrial dispute has raised by Hindustan Unilever

Employees Union against the management of

M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited, Detergent Division,

Vadamangalam, Puducherry over change of service

conditions of their workmen in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),

it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour),

that the said dispute be referred to the Industrial

Tribunal, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall submit the award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of

claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance

and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each

one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Hindustan

Unilever Employees Union (Registration No. 1534/

RTU/2008), Puducherry against the management of

M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited, Detergents

Division, Vadamangalam, Puducherry over change of

service conditions of their workmen without adhering

section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and

violation of 12(3) settlement, dated 10-5-2007

is justified or not?

(b) If not justified, what relief, their workmen are

entitled to? And what conditions should be

adopted?

(By order)

G. MALAR KANNAN,

Joint Secretary to Government (Labour).

127

22 February 2011]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (ENVIRONMENT)

(G. O. Ms. No. 2/Envt./2011, dated 4th February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

The following Scientist in the Department of Science, Technology and Environment of this Administration who has

been appointed on regular basis by direct recruitment through UPSC, is declared to have satisfactorily completed his period

of probation in the post of Scientist on the date as detailed below :

Sl.

Name of the Scientist

Department / office

Date of appointment

Date of

No.

in which working

as Scientist

completion of

probation period

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

R. Sagaya Alfred

Department of Science,

29-11-2002

28-11-2004

Technology and Environment

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

N. SUMATHI,

Deputy Secretary to Government (Envt.).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 27/AIL/Lab./J/2011, dated 7th February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between M/s. Aditi

Diamonds Exports Private Limited, Puducherry and

Thiru Jean Claude over demotion in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry shall .submit the award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference

as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance

with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)

Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a

statement of claim complete with relevant documents,

list of reliances and witnesses to the Labour Court,

Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order

of reference and also forward a copy of such statement

to each one of the opposite parties involved in the

dispute

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru Jean

Claude against the management of M/s. Aditi

Diamonds Exports Private Limited, Puducherry

over demotion is justified or not?

(b) If justified, to what relief, the petitioner is

entitled to ?

if it can be so computed ?

(By order)

G. MALAR KANNAN,

Joint Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 28/AIL/Lab./J/2011,

dated 7th February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between M/s. Hindustan

Unilever Limited Tea Factory, Puducherry, and

Thiru S. Raja over non-employment in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

128

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 February 2011

And whereas in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall .submit the award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule

10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The

party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim

complete with relevant documents, list of reliances and

witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15

days of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute:

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru S. Raja

against the management of M/s. Hindustan

Unilever Limited Tea Factory, Puducherry over non-

employment is justified or not?

(b) If justified, to what relief the petitioner is

entitled to ?

it can be so computed ?

(By order)

G. MALAR KANNAN,

Joint Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 29/AIL/Lab/J/2011, dated 7th February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between M/s. Supreme

Industries Limited, Sanyasikuppam, Puducherry and

Thiru R. Karunakaran over non-employment in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),

it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour)

that the said dispute be referred to the Labour

Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court,

Puducherry shall .submit the award within 3 months

from the date of issue of reference as stipulated

under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of

the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party

raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim

complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and

witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days

of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward

a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute

ANNEXURE

( a ) W h e t h e r t h e d i s p u t e r a i s e d b y

Thiru

Karunakaran

against

the

management of M/s. Supreme Industries Limited,

Sanyasikuppam, Puducherry, over non-employment

is justified or not?

(b) If justified, to what relief, the petitioner is

entitled to ?

can be so computed ?

(By order)

G. MALAR KANNAN,

Joint Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 30/AIL/Lab./J/2011, dated 7th February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute raised by Rajivji Memorial Trust,

Kannur against the management of M/s. Cannanore

Spinning and Weaving Mills, Pallore over termination

of the services of Thiru R.K. Manoharan in respect of

the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O.Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

129

22 February 2011]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),

it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour)

that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court,

Mahe for adjudication. The Labour Court, Mahe shall

submit the award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the

dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with

relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Labour Court, Mahe within 15 days of the receipt of the

order of reference and also forward a copy of such

statement to each one of the opposite parties involved

in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Rajivji

Memorial Trust, Kannur against the management of

M/s. Cannanore Spinning and Weaving Mills,

Pallore over termination of the services of

Thiru R.K. Manoharan is justified or not ?

(b)

If justified, what relief, the petitioner is

entitled to?

(c)

To compute the relief, if any, awarded in

terms of money, if it can be so computed ?

(By order )

G. MALAR KANNAN,

Joint Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (CO-OPERATION)

(G.O. Rt. No. 31/Coop., dated 7th February 2011)

NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of paragraph 9(B)(4) of the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme read with decision

communicated in the letter of Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and

Co-operation vide Letter No. 13011/15/99-Credit-II, dated 16-7-1999 and No. 13011/36/1999-Credit-II, dated 26-9-2005,

the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry and as per decision taken in State Level Coordination Committee for

Crop Insurance held on 1st October 2010 is pleased to notify the following Community Development Blocks

as defined areas, in respect of Rabi 2010-2011 Season—Paddy-III (Navarai/Kodai), Sugarcane, Blackgram and

Greengram in this Union territory of Puducherry.

Season: Rabi 2010-2011

Crop

Notified Communes

No. of CCEs

to be conducted

(1)

(2)

(3)

Puducherry District

Paddy-III

1. Oulgaret (including Mudaliarpet and Puducherry)

(Navarai/Kodai)

2. Mannadipet

3. Villianur

4. Bahour

5. Nettapakkam

6. Ariyankuppam

Puducherry District

Blackgram

1. Oulgaret Commune (including Mudaliarpet and Puducherry)

2. Mannadipet

3. Villianur

4. Bahour

5. Nettapakkam

6. Ariyankuppam

Karaikal District

7. Neravy (including T.R. Pattinam)

8. Thirunallar

9. Nedungadu (including Kottucherry and Karaikal)

130

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 February 2011

Karaikal District

Greengram

1. Neravy (including T.R. Pattinam)

2. Thirunallar

3. Nedungadu (including Kottucherry and Karaikal)

Puducherry District

Sugarcane

1. Nettapakkam

2. Mannadipet

3. Villianur (including Oulgaret)

4. Bahour (including Ariyankuppam)

Karaikal District

5. Thirunallar (including Nedungadu)

2. The rate of premium and sum insured for the abovesaid crops are given below:

Season: Rabi 2010-2011

Normal

Additional

coverage/hectare

Sl.

Crop

Sum

Normal

Sum

Actuarial

Total

No.

insured

premium

insured

premium

sum

rate (%)

insured

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Paddy-III (Navarai/Kodai)

35,490

0.75%

23,660

0.75%

59,150

Blackgram

4,160

2.00%

6,240

34.65%

10,400

Greengram

3,150

2.00%

4,720

43.15%

7,870

Sugarcane

80,040

6.80%

70,040

6.80%

1,50,080

The cut-off date for the receipt of declaration as well as the yield data by the Agricultural

Insurance Company of India, Chennai in respect of loanee and non-loanee farmers are as follows :

Season: Rabi 2010-2011

Loanee farmers

Non-loanee farmers

Name of the

Loaning

Final cut-off

Cut-off date for receipt

Final cut-off

Cut-off

season/crop

period

date for

of proposals by bank

date for

dates for

receipt of

branches/PACS

receipt of

declarations

yield data

by AIC

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Paddy-III

1-12-2010

30-4-2011

31-1-2011 (or)

28-2-2011

30-6-2011

(Navarai/

1 month from the date of

Kodai)

31-3-2011

planting/sowing whichever

is earlier.

Blackgram

1-12-2010

30-4-2011

28-2-2011 (or)

31-3-2011

31-8-2011

1 month from the date of

31-3-2011

planting/sowing whichever

is earlier.

(1)

(2)

(3)

131

22 February 2011]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Greengram

1-12-2010

30-4-2011

28-2-2011 (or)

31-3-2011

31-8-2011

1 month from the date of

31-3-2011

planting/sowing whichever

is earlier.

Sugarcane

1-1-2011

28-2-2012

31-10-2011 (or)

30-11-2011

31-8-2012

1 month from the date of

31-12-2011

planting/sowing whichever

is earlier.

As far as the premium amount to be collected from all farmers, the premium subsidy is 50%

for this season as per G.O. Ms. No. 8/Coop., dated 18-10-2007. Further, as provided in the scheme indemnity

claims will be settled only on the basis of yield data furnished by the Government of Puducherry based on

requisite number of Crop Cutting Experiments (CCEs) conducted under General Crop Estimation Survey (GCES).

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

M. GUNASEKARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Coop.).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (CO-OPERATION)

(G.O. Rt. No. 33/Coop., dated 11th February 2011)

ORDER

Consequent on the extension of cut-off dates in respect of Karaikal region for Paddy-II Crop (Samba/Thallady/

Pishanam) 2010-11 season under the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme vide Letter No. 13011/36/1999-Cr.II,

dated 18-8-2010 received from the Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture

and Co-operation, New Delhi, the cut-off dates as given in Table 2 under para 2 of the G.O. Rt. No. 2/Co-op.,

dated 28-6-2010 may be corrected and read as shown in the Annexure.

ANNEXURE

Crop : Paddy-II (Samba/Thallady/Pishanam) – Rabi 2010-2011 season

FOR

Loanee farmers

Non-loanee farmers

Notified

Loaning

Final cut-off

Cut-off date for receipt

Final cut-off

Cut-off

area

period

date for

of proposals by bank

date for

dates for

receipt of

branches/PACS

receipt of

declarations

yield data

by AIC

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Puducherry

1-8-2010

31-12-2010

30-11-2010 (or)

31-12-2010

30-4-2011

and Karaikal

1 month from date of planting/

regions.

30-11-2010

sowing whichever is earlier.

Yanam

1-10-2010

30-4-2011

31-12-2010 (or)

31-1-2011

31-5-2011

region.

1 month from date of planting/

31-3-2011

sowing whichever is earlier.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

132

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 February 2011

READ

Loanee farmers

Non-loanee farmers

Notified

Loaning

Final cut-off

Cut-off date for receipt

Final cut-off

Cut-off

area

period

date for

of proposals by bank

date for

dates for

receipt of

branches/PACS

receipt of

declarations

yield data

by AIC

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Puducherry

1-8-2010

31-12-2010

30-11-2010 (or)

31-12-2010

30-4-2011

region.

1 month from date of planting/

30-11-2010

sowing whichever is earlier.

Karaikal

1-8-2010

28-2-2011

15-12-2010 (or)

15-1-2011

31-5-2011

region.

1 month from date of planting/

31-12-2010

sowing whichever is earlier.

Yanam

1-10-2010

30-4-2011

31-12-2010 (or)

31-1-2011

31-5-2011

region.

1 month from date of planting/

31-3-2011

sowing whichever is earlier.

2. All other terms and conditions in the G.O. Rt. No. 2/Co-op., dated 28-6-2010 remain unchanged.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

M. GUNASEKARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Co-op.).

ILANGO ADIGAL GOVERNMENT HIGHER

SECONDARY SCHOOL

Puducherry, the 8th February 2011.

TENDER NOTICE

Sealed tenders offering the rate per kilogram are invited

for the sale of old answer scripts and newspapers belonging

to this Institution.

Rate per

kilogram

(1) Old English newspapers

. .

(2) Old Tamil newspapers

. .

(3) Old Examination answer . .

paper (Quarterly, half-yearly

and annual).

2. The sealed tenders should be addressed to the Principal,

Ilango Adigal Government Higher Secondary School

Muthirapalayam, Puducherry-9 superscribing on the envelope

as ‘Tender for old examination answer scripts and newspapers

should reach the undersigned on or before 11-4-2011 at

11.00 a.m. The tenders will be opened at 11.30 a.m. on the

same day in the presence of the tenderers.

3. The intending tenderers should deposit an amount

of ` 100 (Rupees one hundred only) as earnest money

deposit before opening the tenders. The earnest money

deposit will be refunded to the unsuccessful tenderer after

the highest tender is accepted.

4. Tenders received after the due date and time will be

rejected.

5. The successful tenderer should pay the full amount

immediately and clear the items within 24 hours at his own

cost and risk failing which the earnest deposit will be forfeited

to the Government.

No claim on the quantity and quality of the articles

will be admitted once the highest tender is accepted.

The intending tenderers may inspect the articles during

the office hours on any working day.

8. The undersigned reserves the right to accept or reject

any or all tenders without assigning any reason.

This office will not be held responsible for the safe

custody or damage of the articles once the tender is finalised.

VICE-PRINCIPAL.