496

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[28 May 2013

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 67/Lab./AIL/J/2013, dated 17th May 2013)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the award in I.D. No. 8/2012, dated

24-1-2013 of the Labour Court, Puducherry in respect

of the industrial dispute between the Managing

Director, M/s. Deekay Exports Limited, Puducherry and

its workman Thiru A.T. Krishnamoorthy, over full and

final settlement for a period of 14 years has been

received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read

with the notification issued in Labour Department’s

G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby

directed by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the

said award shall be published in the official gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present : Thiru T. MOHANDASS, M.A., M.L.,

Presiding Officer.

Thursday, the 24th day of January 2013

I.D. No. 8/2012

A.T. Krishnamoorthy

. .

Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director,

M/s. Deekay Exports Limited,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This industrial dispute coming on this day for

hearing before me in the presence of Thiru L. Swaminathan

and I. Ilankumar, Advocates for the petitioner and

respondent called absent set ex parte and upon perusing

the case records, this court made the following:

ORDER

This industrial dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government under section 10 (1) (c) of the

Industrial Disputes Act in G.O. Rt.No. 23 AIL/ Lab./

J/2012, dated 29-2-2012. The Government made the

following reference :

(a) W h e t h e r t h e d i s p u t e r ai s e d b y

Thiru A.T. Krishnamoorthy against the management

of M/s. Deekay Exports Limited, Puducherry, over

full and final settlement for a period of 14 years is

justified ?

(b) If justified, what relief, the petitioner is entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed.

2. Today this petition was called. PW.1 present.

Proof affidavit filed. Exs. P.1 to P. 10 marked. Claim

proved. Petitioner is entitled for retrenchment compensation

as per law in force and additional compensation of

` 2,00,000 (two lakhs). The petitioner is also entitled to

gratuity and provident fund for which he is eligible from

the concerned authorities. He is not entitled for any

separate certificate as prayed. No costs.

Written and pronounced by me in the open court on

this 24th day of January 2013.

T. MOHANDASS,

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2012-13.

Puducherry, the 6th May 2013.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark

Certificate bearing Register Number 594456 of March 2010

in respect of R. Sridevi, an ex-pupil of Annai Sivagami

Government Girls’ Higher Secondary School, Mudaliarpet

is reported to have been lost and beyond the scope

of recovery and it is proposed to issue a duplicate

certificate. If the original certificate is to be found

by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of

Government Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation, as

it is no longer valid.

R. KALAISELVAN,

Chief Educational Officer.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2012-13.

Puducherry, the 6th May 2013.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark

Certificate bearing Register Number 436007 of April 2002

in respect of M. Devika, an ex-pupil of St. Joseph

High School, Muthialpet is reported to have been lost