1036

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 November 2013

List of respondent’s exhibits:

Ex.B1

— Photocopy of the charter of demand,

dated 23-1-2009.

Ex.B2

— Copy of the reply submitted to the

Labour Officer, dated 17-4-2009.

Ex.B3

— Copy of Indian Medical Council Act,

dated 30-12-1956.

Ex.B4

— Copy of the notification by the Medical

Council of India.

Ex.B5

— Copy of draft notification of revision of

pay scales by UGC.

Ex.B6

— Copy of notification by UGC for

institutions deemed to be universities.

Ex.B7

— Copy of fixation details to employees by

the respondent.

Ex.B8

— Copy of 18(1) settlement between parties,

dated 24-5-2006.

Ex.B9

— Copy of MoU regarding promotion

policy, dated 8-8-2008.

Ex.B10 — Copy of proposed revision of salary to

the petitioner union.

Ex.B11 — Details of various benefits extended to

the petitioner.

T. MOHANDASS,

Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal,

Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

TRANSPORT SECRETARIAT

No. 231/Tr. Sectt./2013.

Puducherry, the 30th September 2013.

ORDER

Whereas, Shri V. Vijayaraghavan, Assistant Engineer,

Government Automobile Workshop, Puducherry has

been convicted on a criminal charge and sentenced to

undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and pay

fine of ` 1,000

in

default

to

undergo

simple

imprisonment for two months under section 7 of

Prevention of Curruption Act, 1988 and also sentenced

to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to

pay fine of ` 1,000 in default to undergo simple

imprisonment for two months under section 13(2) read

with section 13(i)(d) of the said Act by the Hon’ble

Additional Sessions Judge, Puducherry at Karaikal in

Spl. C.C. No. 1 of 2010 on 6-3-2012;

And whereas, it is considered that the conduct of the

said Shri V. Vijayaraghavan, Assistant Engineer,

Government Automobile Workshop, Puducherry which

has led to his conviction and the gravity of the charge

is such as to warrant the imposition of major penalty;

And whereas, Shri V. Vijayaraghavan, Assistant

Engineer,

Government

Automobile

Workshop,

Puducherry was given an opportunity of personal

hearing and offer his written explanation;

And whereas, the said Shri V. Vijayaraghavan,

Assistant Engineer, Government Automobile workshop,

Puducherry has given a written explanation which has

been duly considered by the Disciplinary Authority;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by rule 19(i) of the Central Civil Services (Classification,

Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, the Disciplinary

Authority hereby removes the said Shri V. Vijayaraghavan,

Assistant Engineer, Government Automobile Workshop,

Puducherry from service.

[By order of Special Secretary (Tr.)-cum-Disciplinary

Authority]

R. CHANDIRASEKARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Tr.).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 72, dated 28th October 2013)

NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of the Order No. 14046/111/2012. UTS-I,

dated 4-10-2013 of the Ministry of Home Affairs

New Delhi and on having reported for duty in this

Administration on the forenoon of 14-10-2013,

Shri Chandraker Bharti, I.A.S., (AGMU:1996), is appointed

as Secretary to Government and allotted the subjects

“Finance, Planning, Industries, Agriculture, Forests and

Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare” with immediate

effect.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

CHETAN B SANGHI,

Chief Secretary to Government.

1037

12 November 2013]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

[G.O. Ms. No. 73/DP&AR/SS.II (1),

dated 30th October 2013]

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, the

following Superintendents shall retire from service with

effect from the afternoon of 31-10-2013.

Sl.

Name of the Superintendent and

No.

Department/Office

(1)

(2)

1

Thiru S. Sivakoumar, Superintendent,

Division-I, Electricity Department, Puducherry.

2

Thiru B. Kumaran, Superintendent,

Division-IX, Electricity Department, Puducherry.

3

Thiru S. Kathan, Superintendent,

Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue),

Karaikal.

4

Thiru V. Chandrasekaran, Superintendent,

Irrigation and Public Health Division,

Public Works Department, Karaikal.

5

Thiru A. Vimalkumar, Superintendent,

Office of the Deputy Director of Accounts and

Treasuries, Mahe.

(By order)

M. KANNAN,

Under Secretary to Government (DP&AR).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 151/AIL/Lab./J/2013, dated 30th October 2013)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry and

its union Hidesign India Private Limited Labour Union,

over unfair labour practice, charter of demands and

wage increase in respect of the matter mentioned in the

Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall pass the

award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute

shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy

of such statement to each one of the opposite parties

involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

union Hidesign India Private Limited Labour Union

against the management of M/s. Hidesign India

Private Limited, Puducherry over their charter of

demands regarding unfair practice and wage increase

is justified or not? If justified what relief the

workmen are entitled to?

(b) Whether the claim of the workers protection

committee over cancellation of 12(3) wage settlement

and revision of wages is justified or not? If justified

what relief they are entitled to?

(c) Whether the management involved and adopts

unfair labour practice against the workmen or not?

If so what relief they are entitled to?

(d) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 155/AIL/Lab./J/2013, dated 31st October 2013)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Manakular Motors, Puducherry and the

Manakular Motors Thozhilalargal Nala Sangam, over

unfair labour practice, transfer of union office bearers

and refusal of employment in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

1038

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 November 2013

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall pass the

award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute

shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy

of such statement to each one of the opposite parties

involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the following claims of the Manakular

Motors Thozhilalargal Nala Sangam, against the

management M/s. Manakular Motors, Puducherry is

justified? If justified what relief they are entitled to?

(a) Whether the Transfer Order, dated 23-8-2013

to Thiru Thamaraikannan, union President and

Thiru Kumaran, Secretary in the absence of

appointment order and certified standing order

regarding terms of contract of employment is justified

or not? If, not justified? what relief they are entitled to?

(b ) Whether

refusal

of

employment

of

Thiru Thamaraikannan, union President and

Thiru Kumaran, Secretary is justified or not? If, not

justified what relief they are entitled to?

(c) Whether the strike commenced w.e.f. 24-8-2013

to 30-8-2013 is legal or justified? If justified, what

relief they are entitled to?

(d) Whether the claim of the union workmen

regarding wages as they resumed duty during the

period 31-8-2013 to 4-9-2013 is justified or not?

If justified what relief they are entitled to?

(e) Whether the deduction of wages in the month

of August 2013 is justified or not? If, not justified

what relief they are entitled to?

(f) Whether the management adopted unfair

labour practice against the union workmen for the

formation of the trade union? If so, what relief they

are entitled to?

2. To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms of

money, if it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 158/AIL/Lab./J/2013, dated 31st October 2013)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s.Whirlpool of India Limited, Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry and its workman Thiru D. Palanivel, over

his non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned

in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O.Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),

it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour)

that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court,

Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court,

Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from

the date of issue of reference as stipulated under

sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the

Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party

raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim

complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and

witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15

days of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

( a )

W h e t h e r t h e d i s p u t e r a i s e d b y

Thiru D. Palanivel, against the management of

M/s. Whirlpool of India Limited, Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified? if

justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b)

To compute the relief, if any, awarded in

terms of money, if it can be so computed ?

(By order)

S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

1039

12 November 2013]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 159/AIL/Lab./J/2013, dated 31st October 2013)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Marg Karaikal Port Pvt. Ltd., Karaikal and

M/s. Agash Dredging and Marine Services Pvt. Ltd.,

Vishakapattinam and its workmen Thiru D. Nagappan

and 9 others over illegal transfer, back wages and other

charter of demands in respect of the matter mentioned

in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O.Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),

it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour)

that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court,

Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court,

Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from

the date of issue of reference as stipulated under

sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the

Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party

raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim

complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and

witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15

days of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioners

Thiruvalargal (1) D. Nagappan, (2) M. Segar,

(3) P. Balamurugan, (4) V. Vijayabalan, (5) P. Ramesh

Kumar, (6) M. Murugesan, (7) R. Muthukumarasamy,

(8) R. Murugeasan, (9) U.Ramamoorthy and

(10) K. Sudhagar over the issues of illegal transfer,

charter of demands, payment of back wages against

the management of M/s. Marg Karaikal Port Pvt. Ltd.,

Karaikal and M/s. Agash Dredging and Marine

Services Pvt. Ltd., Vishakapattinam is justified or not?

(b) If justified, what relief they are entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed ?

(By order)

S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 42/AIL/Lab./J/2013, dated 4th November 2013)

ORDER

Whereas, the management of M/s. Anglo-French

Textiles Ltd., Puducherry has submitted an application

in Form O-3, dated Nil in the Office of the Secretary to

Government, Labour Department, Puducherry with all

enclosures on 19-7-2013 seeking permission for Lay-Off

1962 workman and staff with effect from 16-7-2013 under

section 25-M of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read

with Rule 75(B) of the Industrial Disputes (Central)

Rules, 1957;

Whereas, the management has stated, inter alia, the

following reasons for the intended Lay-off;

(i) Incurring continuous loss and poor financial

status;

(ii) The bank accounts with the Consortium Banks

are classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPA) due

to non-settlement of LC dues over drafts, etc., which

resulted the temporary denial of any financial

assistance by the banks like temporary over draft (OD);

(iii) No raw materials like cotton, yarn, furnace oil,

chemicals, stores and spares to resume the

production activities;

(iv) EPF authorities freezed the accounts of AFT

under 8 F of the non-payment of EPF dues to a tune

of ` 6.50 crores;

(v) Non-payment of wages/salary to the employees

for the past 8 months to the tune of ` 24 crores for

want of funds;

(vi) Shifting of weaving preparatory and Ware

House Departments in “A” unit to a new building in

the “B” or “C” unit for which sufficient funds are

required;

(vii) Till such time no other alternative other than

to declare Lay-off for 45 days;

Whereas, a copy of the Lay-off application has been

forwarded to all the trade unions concerned to furnish

their comments/views vide notice No.6323/AIL/Lab./J/

2013, dated 26-7-2013 and 30-7-2013;

Whereas, a notice, dated 30-7-2013 was sent to the

management and the trade unions and they were given

an opportunity of being heard on the said Lay-off

application on 5-8-2013;

Whereas, the views/replies of the management and

the trade unions and the relevant documents/issues

and the views of the Senior Government Pleader, High

1040

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 November 2013

Court of Judicature at Madras vide letter, dated

26-10-2013 enclosing the copy of the orders pronounced

by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature on 25-10-2013

dismissing the Writ Appeals Nos. 727 and 910 of 2013

in W.P. Nos. 5099 and 23040 of 2010 filed by the

Puducherry Textiles Mills Labour Union, Puducherry

have been examined;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 177/80-Lab., dated 1st September, 1980

of the Labour Department to exercise the powers

conferred by the sub-section (1) of section 25-M of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947)

the undersigned hereby decides to grant permission

sought by the management of M/s. Anglo-French

Textiles, Puducherry to Lay-off workman as defined

under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act 14 of 1947) for a period of 45 days from

the date of publication in the official gazette.

P.R. MEENA, I.A.S.,

Secretary to Government (Labour).

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›][ ®_ÁȬz‚√‚¶ √z]l_ zΩlÚ©√kÏÔ”¬z ÷>™V_ ∂§s¬Ô©√|km

BVÿ>M_, ˇµÔı¶ Â√Ï ∏[kÚD ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m ®_ÁȬz^ ∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^·

÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\B

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

c^· ÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[ ]≈[

®ıˬÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1

]Ú\] S. s¤BÈ‚∑t,

M/s. º√V_¶[ ºÈ√V´‚¶Z¸

\V›]Á´Ô^ �ÆD

58.50

30

\Á™ ®ı 198á200

÷Õ]BV ∏Á´ºk‚ otÿ¶‚,

ºÔ©Û_¸ >BVˆ›>_.

z]Á´›

(ÿ√Vm

�ÆD 205á207,

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ı 81/1,

]≈[.

√ËxÁ≈).

]ÚxÚÔ[ ÔV϶[áII,

\Á™ ®ı 198á200 �ÆD

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD,

205á207, ]ÚxÚÔ[ ÔV϶[áII,

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[,

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD,

Amflºƒˆ.

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[,

Amflºƒˆ.

1973ágD gı| Amflºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amflºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

g‚E©√´©∏_ ∂xÈV¬Ô©√‚¶ Amflºƒˆ ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m¬Ô^ (cˆ\D �ÆD ∂–\] ∂π›>_) s]Ô^, 1976,

∏ˆ° 11á[√Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈ ÷Õ>

∂§s©A ÿkπBV™ º>]loÚÕm √›m ÂV‚Ô”¬z^ ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m gÁðBÏ ∂kÏÔ”¬z ®ø›m

JÈ\VF ÿ>ˆB©√|›mD√Ω ºÔ‚|¬ÿÔV^·©√|˛≈m.

z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈkÁ´BÁ≈¬z^ ÿ√≈©√‚¶ g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›>V_ √ˆÊo¬Ô©√|D.

ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD, 2013 } ∂¬º¶V√Ï | 24 {,

ºÈV.

ºÈV.

ºÈV.

ºÈV.

ºÈV. ƒÕ]´ºƒÔ´[,

ƒÕ]´ºƒÔ´[,

ƒÕ]´ºƒÔ´[,

ƒÕ]´ºƒÔ´[,

ƒÕ]´ºƒÔ´[,

gÁðBÏ.

————

NETTAPAKKAM COMMUNE PANCHAYAT

Nettapakkam, the 24th October 2013.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested for permission to set up the following industry within the

Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat limits, as detailed below.