207
25 March 2014]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
7. The respondent had granted a paid holiday
on 13-5-2009 but only sought adjust to the same against
one of the 10 paid holidays given to the workers upon
mutual agreement under clause 15 of 12(3) Agreement.
Such agreement cannot be termed to be violative of
section 135(B) of Representation of People Act, 1951.
The respondent is offering two extra days holidays over
and above the statutory requirements to enable it off-
set the same against any unforeseen public holidays
declared by the government. 12(3) Settlement has a force
of law under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act.
The settlement is mutually agreed between the parties
and so it cannot be struck down unless it is violative
of any statute. A settlement has always treated as
package and benefits and obligations flow from the
same. No party can seek enforcement only beneficial
clauses and seek rejection of the non-beneficial clauses
in a settlement. The settlement is entered into in the
presence of responsible government officers and so the
parties are bound by each and every terms and
conditions of such settlement. Once the petitioner claim
10 days compulsory holidays as per the terms and
conditions of the settlement. The subsequent limb of
the same clause entitling the management to adjust any
polling day from the said 10 contractual holidays
cannot be rejected as violative of any provision of law.
8. So, it is very clear that clause 15 of the 12(3)
Settlement, dated 10-5-2007 is not violative of any
provision of law and so clause 15 of the 12(3)
Settlement, dated 10-5-2007 is justified.
9. With regard to the question No. 2 and 3 no objection
is raised on the side of the parties with regard to that
there is no agitation in this case. The compromise memo
was filed on the side of the petitioner and the
respondent counsel filed an endorsement that he has
no objection in recording it. And now, the petitioner is
not pressing the petition. So, the petition is dismissed.
Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me
in the open court on this the 27th day of September, 2013.
S. MARY ANSELAM,
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal.
————
List of witnesses examined for the petitioner :
PW.1 —
3-2-2012 —Ezhumalai
PW.2 — 14-8-2013 —G. Ganesan (Assistant Inspector
of Labour).
List of witness examined for the respondent :
RW.1 —
4-4-2012 —M. Arokia Berdila Anand
(HR
Executive
in
the
Respondent Factory).
List of exhibits marked for the petitioner :
Ex.A1 — Memorandum of Settlement, dated 10-5-2007
Ex.A2 — Letter sent by the Inspector of Factories
to the occupier of the petitioner’s
company, dated 16-12-2009.
Ex.A3 — Form-V. Approved by the Inspector of
Factories, dated 11-12-2008.
Ex.A4 — Circular of the Labour Department,
dated 22-4-2009.
Ex.A5 — Letter by the Election Department,
Puducherry to the Labour Commissioner
of Puducherry, dated 4-5-2009.
Ex.A6 — Order issued by the Labour Commissioner,
dated 11-9-2009.
Ex.A7 — Reply by the respondent to the Labour
Officer, dated 3-11-2010.
Ex.A8 — Letter by the organiser of the Hindustan
Unilever Employees Union, dated 3-9-2009.
List of exhibits marked for the respondent :
Ex.B1 — Pay slip of the petitioner for the month
of October 2011.
Ex.B2 — Form-V issued by the factory Manager
respondent for the year 2010, dated
27-1-2010.
List of exhibits marked through PW.2 :
Ex.X1 — Authorisation letter by Commissioner of
Labour to PW. 2, dated 5-7-2013.
S. MARY ANSELAM,
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2013-14.
Puducherry, the 27th February 2014.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark
Certificate under Register Number 476854 of April 2004, in
respect of P. Kala, an ex-pupil of Kasthuribai Gandhi
Government Girls’ Higher Secondary School, Bahour
is reported to have been lost and beyond the scope of
recovery, it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate.
If the original certificate is to be found by anybody, it
should be sent to the Director of Government
Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation as it is no
longer valid.
R. KALAISELVAN,
Chief Educational Officer.
208
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[25 March 2014
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2013-14.
Puducherry, the 27th February 2014.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark
Certificate under Register Number 485252 of March 2003,
in respect of S. Mahalakshmy, an ex-pupil of
Pavendar Bharathidasan Government Higher Secondary
School, P.S. Palayam is reported to have been lost and
beyond the scope of recovery and it is proposed to issue
a duplicate certificate. If the original certificate is to be
found by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of
Government Examinations, Chennai-6 for cncellation
as it is no longer valid.
R. KALAISELVAN,
Chief Educational Officer.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2012-13.
Puducherry, the 3rd March 2014.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark
Certificate under Register Number 437111 of March 2002,
in respect of V. Thilagavathy, an ex-pupil of Vivekananda
Higher Secondary School, Sellaperumalpet is reported
to have been lost and beyond the scope of recovery and
it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate. If the
original certificate is to be found by anybody, it should
be sent to the Director of Government Examinations,
Chennai-6 for cancellation as it is no longer valid.
R. KALAISELVAN,
Chief Educational Officer.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2012-13.
Puducherry, the 3rd March 2014.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark
Certificate under Register Number 1749514 of April 2012,
in respect of Arvind @ Selvamanikandan. S, an
ex-pupil of Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School,
Puducherry is reported to have been lost and beyond the
scope of recovery and it is proposed to issue a
duplicate certificate. If the original certificate is to be
found by anybody, it should be sent to the Director of
Government Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation
as it is no longer valid.
R. KALAISELVAN,
Chief Educational Officer.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (EDUCATION)
(G.O. Ms. No. 83, dated, 13th March 2014)
NOTIFICATION
On attaining the age of superannuation, Dr. S. Varalakshmi,
Principal, Bharathidasan Government College for Women,
Puducherry is admitted into retirement with effect from
the afternoon of 31-3-2014.
(By order)
M. GUNASEKARAN,
Under Secretary to Government (Edn.).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)
(G.O. Ms. No. 16, dated 17th March 2014)
NOTIFICATION
O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,
Thiru A. Palanichamy, Assistant Engineer, Circle-II,
Public Works Department, Puducherry is admitted into
retirement with effect from the afternoon of 31-3-2014.
(By order)
N. SUMATHI,
Joint Secretary to Government (Works).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 48/AIL/Lab./J/2014, dated 18th March 2014)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the employer
of M/s. Tea Shop and Fast Food, KTC, Junction, Mahe
and Mahe Shops and Establishments Workers Union
CITU, Mahe over non-employment of Thiru Yousuf, in
respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this
order;
209
25 March 2014]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.
The Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award
within 3 months from the date of issue of reference
as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)
Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file
a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,
list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court,
Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order
of reference and also forward a copy of such statement
to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Mahe
Shops and Establishments Workers Union, CITU,
Mahe against M/s. Tea Shop and Fast Food, Mahe
over non-employment is justified? If justified, what
relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 50/AIL/Lab./J/2014, dated 18th March 2014)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that
an industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Sunbeam Generators Private Limited, Puducherry
and its workman Thiru S. Saravanan, over non-employment
in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure
to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.
The Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award
within 3 months from the date of issue of reference
as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)
Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file
a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,
list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court,
Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order
of reference and also forward a copy of such statement
to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the
petitioner Thiru S. Saravanan, against the management
of M/s. Sunbeam Generators Private Limited, Puducherry
over non-employment is justified? If justified, what
relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 51/AIL/Lab./J/2014, dated 18th March 2014)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Sunbeam Generators Private Limited, Puducherry
and its workman Thiru R. Yoga, over non-employment
in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure
to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.
210
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[25 March 2014
The Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award
within 3 months from the date of issue of reference
as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)
Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file
a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,
list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court,
Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order
of reference and also forward a copy of such statement
to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the
petitioner Thiru R. Yoga, against the management of
M/s. Sunbeam Generators Private Limited, Puducherry
over non-employment is justified? If justified, what
relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
S. THAMMU GANAPATHY,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
Puducherry, the 17th March 2014.
TENDER NOTICE
Sealed tenders offering the rate for a lot are invited
for the purchase of unserviceable items mentioned in
the Annexure in as-is-where-is condition, belonging to
the Department of Women and Child Development,
Puducherry.
2. The tenders in sealed covers superscribed as
“Tender for the purchase of unserviceable items” should
be addressed to the Senior Accounts Officer,
Department of Women and Child Development,
Puducherry-605 013, so as to reach this office on or
before 11.00 a.m. on 9-4-2014. The tenders will be opened
at 11.30 a.m. on the same day in the presence of
tenderers if any.
3. The intending tenderers should deposit an earnest
money deposit of ` 2,000 (Rupees two thousand only).
The earnest money deposit of the unsuccessful
tenderers will be refunded after finalising the tender
and that of the successful tenderer will be forfeited
towards the cost of the items.
4. Further, in the event of successful tenderer failing
to pay the cost in full and lift the items at the agreed
rate at their own expenses within two days from the
date of finalisation of the tender, the earnest money
deposit will be forfeited in favour of the Government
and the concerned tenderer will lose the rights. If the
said last day happens to be a Government holiday, the
date will be extended till the next working day on receipt
of specific request in writing from the tenderer.
5. The undersigned reserves the right to accept or
reject any or all tenders without assigning any reason
thereof. Any contravention of the rules of tender notice
will result in the forfeiture of the earnest money deposit.
6. The unserviceable items can be inspected at the
Anganwadi Centre, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kottupalayam,
Lawspet, Puducherry-8, on 7th and 8th of April 2014
between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m.
7. No claim about the quantity, quality and the value
of the sold goods will be admitted. The removal of items
from this office shall be only during working hours.
8. Sales tax will be collected as per existing rates.
ANNEXURE
Sl.
Items
Quantity
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
No./Nos.
1
Deksa-big
7
2
Deksa-small
13
3
Idly pot
38
4
Jallikarandi
15
5
Dabara-big
27
6
Dabara-small
44
7
Cooker
1
8
Oil-can
10
9
Deep dabara
3
10
Tumbler
30
11
Plate
60
12
Jallikarandi
1
13
Arivalmanai
19
14
Drum
10
15
Measure-½ lit.
5
16
Measure-½ lit.
7
17
Zinc drum-big
19