756

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 October 2014

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 126/Lab./AIL/J/2014, dated 30th September 2014)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an award in I.D.(T). No. 23/2012, dated

3-9-2014 of the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry in

respect of the industrial dispute between the Managing

Director, M/s. Annai Industries Linings (P) Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru P. Sivalingam, over non-payment

of bonus for the year 2009-2010 for an amount of

` 7,300 and increment arrears from April 2009 till

September 2009 for an amount of ` 1,200 has been

received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed

by Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said award

shall be published in the official gazette, Puducherry.

(By order)

GIDDI BALARAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AT PONDICHERRY

Present : Thiru G. DHANARAJ, B.SC, B.L,

Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal.

Wednesday, the 3rd day of September 2014.

I.D.(T) No. 23/2012

P. Sivalingam

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Annai Industries Linings (P) Limited,

Puducherry

. . Respondent

This industrial dispute coming on this day before me

for hearing in the presence of Thiru B. Mohandoss,

Advocate for the petitioner, upon perusing the case

records, this court passed the following:

AWARD

This industrial dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry, vide G.O. Rt.

No. 136/AIL/Lab./J/2012, dated 23-8-2012 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry to resolve the following dispute

between the petitioner and the respondent, viz.,

(1) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru P. Sivalingam,

against the management of M/s. Annai Industries

Linings (P) Limited, Puducherry over non-payment of

bonus for the year 2009-2010 for an amount of

` 7,300 and increment arrears from April 2009 till

September 2009 for an amount of ` 1,200 is justified?

(2) If justified, to what relief the petitioner is

entitled to?

(3) To compute the relief, if any, in terms of money

if it can be so computed?

2. Petitioner called absent. No representation. Already

the petitioner’s counsel reported ‘no instruction’. Hence

this reference is closed for non-prosecution.

Written and pronounced by me in the open court on

this the 3rd day of September 2014.

G. DHANARAJ,

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court, Pondicherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

No. A.32014/1/2010/DPAR/SS-I(2).

Puducherry, the 24th September 2014.

ORDER

Sanction of the competent authority is hereby accorded

for extension of the period of ad hoc appointments of

the following Pondicherry Civil Service (Entry Grade)

Officers made vide Order No.A.32014/1/2009/DPAR/SS-

I(1)/Vol-II, dated 18-9-2012 and 30-9-2013 for a further

period of one year from 18-9-2014 to 17-9-2015:

Sl.

Name of the officer

Designation

No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

Thiru/Tmt. :

1

D. Subrahmanyeswara Rao

Commissioner,

Oulgaret Municipality.

2

M. Murugesan

Deputy Director (MA),

Local Administration

Department.