[ 277 ]

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 4/2015-WCD (SW - IV), dated 30th April 2015)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 39 of the Protection

of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012)

read with the Letter No.U-11030/7/2013-UTL, dated 4th April 2014 of the

Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, the

Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry hereby pleased to make the following

Guidelines for the use of Professionals and Experts under section 39 of

the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India under

No. M. 8270



La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

PART - II



EXTRAORDINAIRE

EXTRAORDINARY



Publiée par

Published by



Autorité

Authority

` 32-00

Prix : ` 32-00

Price :

` 32-00







2015 } | 15 {

No. 39 Poudouchéry

Vendredi

15

Avril

2015

No.

Puducherry

Friday

15th

April

2015

( 25 Vaisakha 1937 )

Registered No.

SSP/PY/44/2015-17

WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/

WPP-88/2015-17

Dated : 15-5-2015

Price : ` 32-00

278

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF PROFESSIONALS AND

EXPERTS UNDER SECTION 39 OF THE PROTECTION OF

CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES (POCSO) ACT, 2012

(Act No. 32 of 2012)

CHAPTER – 1

INTRODUCTION

An overview of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

Act, 2012.— To deal with child sexual abuse cases, the Government has

brought in a special law, namely, The Protection of Children from Sexual

Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The Act has come into force with effect

from 14th November, 2012 along with the rules framed thereunder.

The POCSO Act, 2012 is a comprehensive law to provide for the

protection of children from the offences of sexual assault, sexual

harassment and pornography, while safeguarding the interests of the

child at every stage of the judicial process by incorporating child-

friendly mechanisms for reporting, recording of evidence, investigation

and speedy trial of offences through designated Special Courts.

The said Act defines a child as any person below eighteen years

of age, and defines different forms of sexual abuse, including penetrative

and non-penetrative assault, as well as sexual harassment and

pornography, and deems a sexual assault to be "aggravated" under

certain circumstances, such as when the abused child is mentally ill or

when the abuse is committed by a person in a position of trust or

authority vis-à-vis the child, like a family member, police officer, teacher,

or doctor. People who traffic children for sexual purposes are also

punishable under the provisions relating to abetment in the said Act.

The said Act prescribes stringent punishment graded as per the gravity

of the offence, with a maximum term of rigorous imprisonment for life,

and fine.

In keeping with the best international child protection standards,

the said Act also provides for mandatory reporting of sexual offences.

This casts a legal duty upon a person who has knowledge that a child

has been sexually abused to report the offence; if he fails to do so, he

may be punished with six months imprisonment and/or a fine.

279

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

The said Act also casts the police in the role of child protectors

during the investigative process. Thus, the police personnel receiving

a report of sexual abuse of a child are given the responsibility of making

urgent arrangements for the care and protection of the child, such as

obtaining emergency medical treatment for the child and placing the child

in a shelter home, should the need arise. The police are also required to

bring the matter to the attention of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC)

within 24 hours of receiving the report, so that the CWC may then

proceed where required to make further arrangements for the safety and

security of the child.

The said Act makes provisions for the medical examination of the

child in a manner designed to cause as little distress as possible. The

examination is to be carried out in the presence of the parent or other

person whom the child trusts, and in the case of a female child, by a

female doctor.

The said Act provides for Special Courts that conduct the trial in-

camera and without revealing the identity of the child, in a child-friendly

manner. Hence, the child may have a parent or other trusted person

present at the time of testifying and can call for assistance from an

interpreter, special educator, or other professional while giving evidence;

further, the child is not to be called repeatedly to testify in court and

may testify through video-link rather than in a courtroom. Above all,

the said Act stipulates that a case of child sexual abuse must be disposed

of within one year from the date the offence is reported. It also provides

for the Special Court to determine the amount of compensation to be

paid to a child who has been sexually abused, so that this money can

then be used for the child's medical treatment and rehabilitation.

The said Act recognizes almost every known form of sexual abuse

against children as punishable offences, and makes the different agencies

of the State, such as the police, judiciary and child protection machinery,

collaborators in securing justice for a sexually abused child. Further, by

providing for a child-friendly judicial process, the said Act encourages

children who have been victims of sexual abuse to report the offence

and seek redress for their suffering, as well as to obtain assistance in

overcoming their trauma. In time, the said Act will provide a means not

only to report and punish those who abuse and exploit the innocence

of children, but also prove an effective deterrent in curbing the

occurrence of these offences.

280

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

The said Act is to be implemented with the active participation of

the State Governments. Under section 39 of the said Act, the State

Government is required to frame guidelines for the use of persons

including non-governmental organizations, professionals and experts or

persons trained in and having knowledge of psychology, social work,

physical health, mental health and child development to assist the child

at the trial and pre-trial stage. The following guidelines are formulated

by the Central Government, based on which Union Territory of

Puducherry Government framed more extensive and specific guidelines

as per the specific needs.

Multi-sectoral approach.— Children who have been sexually

abused are not only traumatized as a result of their experience, but are

also more vulnerable to further and repeated abuse and at risk of

secondary victimization at the hands of the justice delivery

process. A common example is the handling of cases of child victims

by unspecialized police, prosecutors and judges who are not trained in

justice for children, children's rights or how to deal and communicate

with victim children and their families. The lack of clear guidelines and

procedures on how to deal with child victims and their families in a child-

sensitive manner during the court process affects the quality of trial

and evidence and trial process; the child is subjected in such cases to

repeated probing and questioning, made to relive the traumatic incident

again and again, and thereby suffer in the retelling. Another instance is

that of child victims not receiving proper medical support and

counselling, causing physical and mental distress to the child and his/

her family and hampering the healing process for the child. In addition

to this, families and child victims are unable to benefit from legal aid as

the appropriate agencies are not involved at the right stage in the

procedure. Child victims do not receive timely advice and assistance so

as to be free from a fear of family breakdowns and social isolation if the

offender is a relative and/or the breadwinner of the family. There is also

no system of supervision for checking the welfare and well-being of child

victims during and after the court process, particularly when the abuser

is the parent or guardian of the child.

There is thus a need for prompt and systematic multi-sectoral

intervention that will be conducive to the justice delivery process,

minimize the risks of health problems, enhance the recovery of the child

and prevent further trauma. This can be achieved through action that

281

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

addresses the needs of the child effectively, not only to protect him from

further abuse and help him deal with his/her trauma but also to ensure

that he is not revictimised in the course of the justice delivery process.

In addition to this, it also has to be ensured that the child is steered

towards the path of healing, recovery and rehabilitation.

The prevention of child sexual abuse, protection of victims, justice

delivery, and rehabilitation of victims are not isolated issues. The

achievement of these objectives requires a co-ordinate response of all

the key players, which include the police, prosecution, courts, medical

institutions, psychologists and counsellors, as well as institutions that

provide social services to the children. The protection of children from

violence and abuse thus requires an integrated and coordinated

approach. Needless to say, the identification and understanding of the

roles of each of these professionals is crucial to avoid duplication and

promote effective convergence.

A multi-sectoral approach, while mindful of children's rights, would

address the problems related to uncoordinated interagency mechanisms

that child victims face in the legal and social service process. It will

provide a frame work within which the service providers will work and

provide a mechanism for information-sharing to help the victim. The

process of investigation and referral of cases will also improve. It is

envisaged that such an approach will ensure support for the child and

his/her family, including assistance with police and court proceedings,

arrangements for emergency shelter for children, arrangements for

counselling, therapy, and training courses, appropriate rehabilitative

services including protective custody and foster care, if necessary;

information on and access to financial assistance, where appropriate,

and monitoring of family involvement.

The responsibility of supporting children who have been sexually

abused should be embraced by the whole community, but it is the

professionals that work in this field who play an important role in

enabling the healing process. These guidelines are therefore aimed at

various professionals involved in providing services to the child and

other affected persons including his/her family. Their objective is to

foster better response mechanisms involving coordination amongst

these professionals, so as to result in the evolution of a multi-sectoral,

multi-disciplinary approach that will go a long way in achieving the

objectives of the POCSO Act, 2012.

————

282

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

CHAPTER – 2

GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR USE OF PROFESSIONALS AND EXPERTS ASSISTING

THE CHILD AT PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL STAGES

The fundamental principles to be followed in the determination of

a case involving a sexual offence against a child have been laid down

in various international instruments and in the Preamble to the POCSO

Act, 2012 itself. The State Governments, the Child Welfare Committee,

the Police, the Special Courts, all other Government functionaries as well

as Non-Government Organisations, and all professionals and experts

assisting the child at the trial and pre-trial stages are bound to abide by

these principles.

These principles are –

(a) Right to life and survival.— Every child has the right to life

and survival and to be shielded from any form of hardship, abuse or

neglect, including physical, psychological, mental and emotional abuse

and neglect; and to a chance for harmonious development and a

standard of living adequate for physical, mental, spiritual, moral and

social growth. In the case of a child who has been traumatized, every

step should be taken to enable the child to enjoy healthy development.

(b) The best interests of the child.— Every child has the right

to have his/her best interests given primary consideration. This includes

the right to protection and to a chance for harmonious development.

Protecting the child's best interests means not only protecting the child

from secondary victimisation and hardship while involved in the justice

process as victim or witness, but also enhancing the child's capacity to

contribute to that process. Secondary victimisation refers to the

victimisation that occurs not as a direct result of the criminal act but

through the response of institutions and individuals to the victim.

(c) The right to be treated with dignity and compassion.—

Child victims should be treated in a caring and sensitive manner

throughout the justice process, taking into account their personal

situation and immediate needs, age, gender, disability and level of

maturity and fully respecting their physical, mental and moral integrity.

Interference in the child's private life should be limited to the minimum

needed and information shared on a need to know basis. Efforts should

also be made to reduce the number of professionals interviewing the

283

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

child. At the same time, however, it is important that high standards of

evidence collection are maintained in order to ensure fair and equitable

outcomes of the justice process. In order to avoid further hardship to

the child, interviews, examination and other forms of investigation should

be conducted by trained professionals who proceed in a sensitive,

respectful and thorough manner in a child-friendly environment. All

interactions should also take place in a language that the child uses

and understands. Medical examination should be ordered only where it

is necessary for the investigation of the case and is in the best interests

of the child and it should be minimally intrusive.

(d) The right to be protected from discrimination.— The justice

process and support services available to child victims and witnesses

and their families should be sensitive to the child's age, wishes,

understanding, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic, cultural, religious,

linguistic and social background, caste and socio-economic condition,

as well as to the special needs of the child, including health, abilities

and capacities. Professionals should be trained and educated about such

differences. Age should not be a barrier to a child's right to participate

fully in the justice process. Every child should be treated as a capable

witness, according to his/her age and level of maturity.

(e) The right to special preventive measures.— Children may

already face twice as much risk of repeated victimisation as adults

because they often are or are perceived by a potential offender as being

vulnerable, unsure of how to defend themselves or unable to properly

assert themselves and take a strong position against an adult.

A preventive measure that could be used to protect children is to demand

references and a criminal background assessment before hiring personnel

likely to work with children, such as school teachers.

(f) The right to be informed.— There are two aspects of child

“victims and witnesses” right to be informed. The first aspect is the more

general one and consists of informing child victims and witnesses about

the assistance they are entitled to, the way legal proceedings are

organized and the role they can play in those proceedings if they decide

to do so. The second aspect is more specific and relates to information

on the particular case in which the child is involved: it implies being

informed about the progress of the case, about the scheduling of the

proceedings, about what is expected of the child, about the decisions

rendered, about the status of the offender, and so forth.

284

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(g) The right to be heard and to express views and concerns.—

Every child has the right to be heard in respect of matters affecting

him/her. The child has a right to participate at all levels: being informed,

expressing an informed view, having that view taken into account, and

being the main or joint decision maker. When, for any good reason, the

requirements and expectations of the child cannot be met, it needs to

be explained to the child, in a child-friendly way, why certain decisions

are made, why certain elements or facts are or are not discussed or

questioned in Court and why certain views are not taken into

consideration. It is important to show respect for elements that a child

finds important in his/her story, but which are not necessarily relevant

as evidence.

(h) The right to effective assistance.— The child must receive

the required assistance to address his/her needs and enable him/her to

participate effectively at all stages of the justice process. This may

include assistance and support services such as financial, legal,

counselling, health, social and educational services, physical and

psychological recovery services and other services necessary for the

child's healing, as well as for justice and reintegration.

(i) The right to privacy.— The child's privacy and identity

must be protected at all stages of the pre-trial and trial process. The

release of information about a child victim or witness, in particular in

the media, may endanger the child's safety, cause the child intense

shame and humiliation, discourage him from telling what happened and

cause him severe emotional harm. Release of information about a child

victim or witness may put a strain on the relationships of the child with

family, peers and community, especially in cases of sexual abuse. In some

cases it might also lead to stigmatization by the community, thereby

aggravating secondary victimization of the child. There are two essential

ways of protecting the privacy of child victims and witnesses: firstly,

by restricting the disclosure of information on child victims and

witnesses and secondly, by restricting the attendance of the general

public or non-essential persons in courtrooms.

(j) The right to be protected from hardship during the justice

process.— Throughout the justice process, child victims are exposed

to hardship; also referred to as secondary victimization: this can occur

while reporting the crime and recounting what has happened, while

awaiting trial and while testifying in court. The judicial process is a very

stressful one for the child as far as possible, any stress the child may

have as a result of the process should be minimized.

285

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(k) The right to safety.— Where the safety of a child victim

may be at risk, appropriate measures should be taken to require the

reporting of those safety risks to appropriate authorities and to protect

the child from such risk before, during and after the justice process.

Professionals should be trained in recognizing and preventing

intimidation, threats and harm to child victims and witnesses. Where

child victims and witnesses may be the subject of intimidation, threats

or harm, appropriate conditions should be put in place to ensure the

safety of the child.

(l) The right to compensation.— The child victim may be

awarded compensation1 for his/her relief and rehabilitation. This

compensation may be awarded at an interim stage, during the pendency

of trial, as well as at the conclusion of the trial. Procedures for obtaining

and enforcing reparation should be readily accessible and child-

sensitive. Victims may be repaid for material losses and damages

incurred, receive medical and/or psychosocial support and obtain

reparation for ongoing suffering.

1 As per section 33 (8) of POCSO Act, 2012 and Rule 7(3) of POCSO Rules, 2012

so as to commensurate with the short and long term negative impact on the

child. Further, as stated in Rule 7 (4) of the POCSO Rules, 2012, the compensation

is to be paid by State Government from the Victims Compensation Fund or

other scheme or fund established by it under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

or any other law for the time being in force, and in the absence of such fund

or scheme, by the State Government.

————

286

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

CHAPTER – 3

GUIDELINES ON INTERVIEWING A CHILD : FORENSIC INTERVIEW PROTOCOL

There are two distinct aspects to the gathering of information from

the child (or attending adults) in cases of alleged child sexual abuse:

(a) the medical history and (b) the interview. The interview stage of the

assessment goes beyond the medical history in that it seeks to obtain

information directly related to the alleged sexual abuse, for example,

details of the assault, including the time and place, frequency, description

of clothing worn and so on. Interviewing of children is a specialized

skill and, if possible, should be conducted by a trained professional.

In the context of the POCSO Act, 2012 interviews may need to be

conducted by a variety of professionals, including police or investigative

agencies. These are forensic rather than therapeutic interviews, with the

objective being to obtain a statement from the child in a manner that is

developmentally-sensitive, unbiased, and truth-seeking, that will support

accurate and fair decision-making in the criminal justice and child welfare

systems. Information obtained from an investigative or forensic interview

may be useful for making treatment decisions, but the interview is not

part of a treatment process.

The following are some basic guidelines that should be kept in mind

while conducting the forensic interview to ensure that the interview

process does not become traumatic for the child. Regardless of who is

responsible for the medical history and interview, the two aspects of

information gathering should be conducted in a coordinated manner so

that the child is not further traumatized by unnecessary repetition of

questioning and information is not lost or distorted.

1. Reasons for interviewing the child :

(i) To get a picture of the child's physical and emotional state;

(ii) To establish whether the child needs urgent medical

attention;

(iii) To hear the child's version of the circumstances leading

to the concern;

(iv) To get a picture of the child's relationship with their

parents or family;

287

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(v) To support the child to participate in decisions affecting

them according to their age and maturity;

(vi) To find out who the child trusts;

(vii) To inform the child of any further steps to be taken in the

enquiry;

(viii) To assure the child that he/she is now safe and would be

cared for, looked after, protected; and

(ix) To identify areas that would/might need counselling/

psychiatric intervention.

1.1 Interview setting : The more comfortable a child is, the more

information he is likely to share. Also, children may be too embarrassed

to share intimate details when they believe that others can overhear what

they are saying. As far as possible, interviews should be conducted in

a safe, neutral and child-friendly environment.

The interviewer can incorporate elements to make a room appear

child-friendly, such as toys, art material or other props. Distractions like

ringing phones, other people's voices and elaborate play material should

be removed as far as possible.

1.2 Things to be kept in mind while interviewing a child :

(i) All children should be approached with extreme sensitivity

and their vulnerability recognized and understood.

(ii) Try to establish a neutral environment and rapport with

the child before beginning the interview. For example, if the

interview must be conducted in the child's home, select a private

location away from parents or siblings that appears to be the

most neutral spot.

(iii) Try to select locations that are away from traffic, noise,

or other disruptions. Items such as telephones, cell phones,

televisions, and other potential distractions should be

temporarily turned off.

(iv) The interview location should be as simple and

uncluttered as possible, containing a table and chairs. Avoid

playrooms or other locations with visible toys and books that

will distract children.

288

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(v) Always identify yourself as a helping person and try to

build a rapport with the child.

(vi) Make the child comfortable with the interview setting.

Gather preliminary information about the child's verbal skills and

cognitive maturity. Convey that the goal of the interview is for

the child to talk and ask questions that invite the child to talk

(e.g., "tell me about your family").

(vii) Ask the child if he/she knows why they have come to

see you. Children are often confused about the purpose of the

interview or worried that they are in trouble.

(viii) Convey and maintain a relaxed, friendly atmosphere.

Do not express surprise, disgust, disbelief, or other emotional

reactions to descriptions of the abuse.

(ix) Avoid touching the child and respect the child's personal

space. Do not stare at the child or sit uncomfortably close.

(x) Do not suggest feelings or responses to the child. For

example, do not say, "I know how difficult this must be for you."

(xi) Do not make false promises. For example, do not say,

"Everything will be okay" or "You will never have to talk about

this again.".

(xii) Establish ground rules for the interview, including

permission for the child to say he/she doesn't know and

permission to correct the interviewer.

(xiii) Ask the child to describe what happened, or is

happening, to them in their own words. The interviewer should,

as far as possible, follow the child's lead; however, he may have

to delicately introduce the topics of the abuse.

(xiv) Always begin with open-ended questions. Avoid asking

the child a direct question, such as "Did somebody touch your

privates last week?" Instead, try "I understand something has

been bothering you. Tell me about it.".

(xv) After initially starting like this, move on to allow the

child to use free narrative. For example, you can say, "I want to

understand everything about [refer back to child's statement].

Start with the first thing that happened and tell me everything

you can, even things you don't think are very important.".

289

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(xvi) Avoid the use of leading questions that imply an answer

or assume facts that might be in dispute and use direct

questioning only when open-ended questioning/free narrative

has been exhausted.

(xvii) The interviewer should clarify the following:

(a) Descriptions of events.

(b) The identity of the perpetrator(s).

(c) Whether allegations involve a single event or multiple

events.

(d) The presence and identities of other witnesses.

(e) Whether similar events have happened to other

children.

(f) Whether the child told anyone about the event(s).

(g) The time frame and location/venue.

(h) Alternative explanations for the allegations.

(xviii) However, interviewers should avoid probing for

unnecessary details. For example, it may not be essential to get

a detailed description of an alleged perpetrator if he/she is

someone who is familiar to the child (e.g., a relative or teacher).

Although it is useful if the child can recall when and where each

event occurred, children may have difficulty specifying this

information if they are young, if the event happened a long time

ago, or if there has been ongoing abuse over a period of time.

(xix) The child may get exhausted frequently and easily; in

such an event, it is advisable not to prolong the inquiry, but

rather to divert the child's mind and come back to the sexual

abuse when the child is refreshed.

(xx) Regularly check if the child is hungry or thirsty, tired or

sleepy, and address these needs immediately.

(xxi) Let the child do the talking and answer any questions

the child may have in a direct manner.

(xxii) Avoid questioning the child as to why he behaved in a

particular way (e.g., "Why didn't you tell your mother that

night?"). Young children have difficulty answering such

questions and may feel that you are blaming them for the

situation.

290

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(xxiii) Avoid correcting the child's behaviour unnecessarily

during the interview. It can be helpful to direct the child's

attention with meaningful explanations (e.g., "I have a little

trouble hearing, so it helps me a lot if you look at me when you

are talking so that I can hear you") but avoid correcting nervous

behaviour that may be slowing the pace of the interview or even

preventing it from proceeding.

(xxiv) When two professionals will be present, it is best to

appoint one as the primary interviewer, with the second

professional taking notes or suggesting additional questions

when the interview is drawing to a close.

(xxv) Interviewers should not discuss the case in front of the

child.

(xxvi) Individuals who might be accused of influencing

children to discuss abuse, such as parents involved in custody

disputes or therapists, should not be allowed to sit with children

during interviews.

(xxvii) In some cases, the interviewer may consider it

appropriate to allow a support person to sit in on the interview;

but in these situations, such a person be instructed that only

the child is allowed to talk unless a question is directed to the

support person. Also, the support person should be seated out

of the child's line of vision to avoid allegations that the child

was reacting to nonverbal signals from a trusted adult.

(xxviii) When planning investigative strategies, consider

other children (boys as well as girls) that may have had contact

with the alleged perpetrator. For example, there may be an

indication to examine the child's siblings. Also consider

interviewing the parent or guardian or other family member of

the child, without the child present.

(xxix) The interviewer should convey to all parties that no

assumptions have been made about whether abuse has occurred.

(xxx) The interviewer should take the time necessary to

perform a complete evaluation and should avoid any coercive

quality to the interview.

291

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(xxxi) Interview procedures may be modified in cases

involving very young, minimally verbal children or children with

special needs (e.g., developmentally delayed, electively mute,

non-native speakers).

(xxxii) Try to establish the child's developmental level in

order to understand any limitations as well as appropriate

interactions. It is important to realize that young children have

little or no concept of numbers or time, and that they have

limited vocabulary and may use terminology differently to adults,

making interpretation of questions and answers a sensitive

matter.

(xxxiii) A variety of non-verbal tools may be used to assist

young children in communication, including drawings, toys,

dollhouses, dolls, puppets, etc. Since such materials have the

potential to be distracting or misleading they should be used

with care. They are discretionary for older children.

(xxxiv) Story books, colouring books or videos that contain

explicit descriptions of abuse situations are potentially

suggestive and are primary teaching tools. They are typically

not appropriate for information-gathering purposes.

In certain situations, the interviewer may consider it appropriate

to interview the child victim together with his/her parent or guardian or

other person in whom the child has trust and confidence. In such cases,

the following guidance may be useful :

(i) When possible, interviewing the primary caregiver and

reviewing other collateral data first to gather background

information may facilitate the evaluation process.

(ii) The child should be seen individually, except when the

child refuses to separate from a parent/guardian. Discussion of

possible abuse with the child in the presence of the caregiver

during evaluation interviews should be avoided except when

necessary to elicit information from the child. In such cases, the

interview setting should be structured to reduce the possibility

of improper influence by the caregiver on the child's behaviour

or statements.

292

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(iii) In some cases, joint sessions with the child and the non-

accused caregiver or accused or suspected individual might be

helpful to obtain information regarding the overall quality of the

relationships. Such joint sessions should not be conducted for

the purpose of determining whether abuse occurred based on

the child's reactions to the participating adult. Joint sessions

should not be conducted if they will cause significant distress

for the child.

2. Children with special needs :

(i) It is important to understand that children may have

special physical or mental needs, or a combination of both.

(ii) Be aware that the risk of criminal victimization (including

sexual assault) for children with special needs appears to be

much higher than for those without such needs. Children with

special needs are often victimized repeatedly by the same

offender. Caretakers, family members, or friends may be

responsible for the sexual abuse.

(iii) Respect the child's wishes to have or not have

caretakers, family members, or friends present during the

interview. Although these persons may be accustomed to

speaking on behalf of the child, it is critical that they not

influence the statements of the child. If professional assistance

is required (e.g., from a language interpreter or mental health

professional) this should be arranged.

(iv) Ideally those providing assistance should not be

associated with the child. Thus as far as possible, avoid using

a relative or friend of the child as an interpreter.

(v) When preparing for the interview, consult with the adults

in the child's world who understand the nature of his/her

disability and are familiar with how the child communicates.

Teachers and other professionals or paraprofessionals who have

had experience in communicating with the child can be an

invaluable resource to the interview team. This may include

speech/language pathologists, educational psychologists,

counsellors, teachers, clinical psychologists, social workers,

nurses, child and adolescent psychiatrists, pediatricians, etc.

293

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(vi) Speak directly to a child with special needs, even when

interpreters, intermediaries, or guardians are present. Assess the

child's level of ability and need for assistance during the

interview process.

(vii) Note that not all children who are deaf or hard-of-

hearing understand sign language or can read lips. Not all blind

persons can read Braille. Be aware that a child with sensory

disabilities may prefer communicating through an intermediary

who is familiar with his/her patterns of speech. Ideally, this

would be someone not associated with the child, but in some

cases this may be necessary.

(viii) The child may experience difficulty with the concept

of time, such as the concept of before and after, and being able

to sequence events. The child may not be able to accurately

define when something happened. It may be helpful to link

events with major activities in the child's life, school events, or

routines such as mealtimes.

(ix) Allow extra time for the interpreter to transfer the

complete message to the child and for the child to form answers.

(x) Recognize that the child may have also some degree of

cognitive disability: mental retardation, mental illness,

developmental disabilities, traumatic brain injury, etc. Note

however that not all developmental disabilities affect cognitive

ability (e.g., cerebral palsy may result in physical rather than

mental impairment). Be aware that a child with cognitive

disabilities may be easily distracted and have difficulty focusing.

Speak to the child in a clear, calm voice and ask very specific,

concrete questions. Be exact when explaining what will happen

during the medical examination process and why.

(xi) Keep in mind that children with special needs may be

reluctant to report the crime or consent to the examination for

fear of losing their independence. For example, they may have

to enter a long-term care facility if their caretakers assaulted them

or may need extended hospitalization to treat and allow injuries

to heal.

(xii) While a child's special need may have resulted in him

being more vulnerable to abuse, it is important to listen to his/

her concerns about the assault and what the experience was like

for them, and not focus on the role of his/her special need.

294

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(xiii) Assure the child that it is not his/her fault that he was

sexually assaulted. If needed, encourage discussion in a

counselling/advocacy setting if he/she is concerned about their

safety in the future.

3. Procedures when interviewing parents/caregivers :

(i) Inform parents/caregivers in an open and honest way of

existing concerns and reports about their child or children;

(ii) Explain how information about the case has been, and

will be, obtained;

(iii) Identify the professionals who have been contacted so far;

(iv) Invite the parents/caregivers to give an explanation of

their view of the concern;

(v) Show a willingness to consider different interpretations

of the concern;

(vi) Ensure that the parents/caregivers are fully aware of the

way that information is going to be assessed and evaluated, and

what expectations are held of them about the way they care for

and protect their children;

(vii) Explain the legal context in which the concern is being

investigated;

(viii) If the concern arose from an incident perpetrated by

one of the child's parents/caregivers, the worker should try to

gain the support and cooperation of the other parent/caregiver

to facilitate ongoing protection of the child; and

(ix) A child should never be asked to discuss the possible

abuse in front of an accused or suspected parent.

If it is considered necessary by CWC to remove a child from

his/her parents/caregivers or their homes, then the following must be

considered : 2

2 Rule 4(5) and (6) of POCSO Rules, 2012 states that prior to making a

determination as to whether the child needs to be taken out of the custody of

his/her family or shared household, the inquiry should be conducted in a manner

that does not unnecessarily expose the child to injury or inconvenience. Hence,

these considerations would help ascertain the same.

295

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(i) In the first instance, all possible efforts should be made

to place the child in a situation that is familiar, preferably with

family or friends

(ii) As far as possible, the timing of the move should be

sensitively handled.

(iii) The child's parents/caregivers should be informed of the

action proposed, unless doing so would endanger the child or

jeopardize the placement process.

(iv) The child should be informed of the proposed action if

he or she has not been involved in the decision.

(v) The child's parents/caregivers should be informed of the

child's location, unless otherwise directed by the Court.

(vi) The child's parents/caregivers should be advised about

and assisted in obtaining legal advice.

4. Best practice principles for the use of interpreters :

Interpreters may be needed during both the investigation and trial of

cases of child sexual abuse. They may be needed for witnesses and for

parties who speak a language different from that of the Court in that

State, or for witnesses and parties who have speech or hearing

impairments or other communication difficulties.

The police or Special Juvenile Police Unit may contact the

District Child Protection Unit (DCPU), whose responsibility it is under

the POCSO Act and Rules, 2012 to provide interpreters, translators, etc.

Where an interpreter is not available, a non-professional may be asked

to interpret for the child; however, in these cases, it must be ensured

that there is no conflict of interest. For example, where there is an

allegation of child sexual abuse against the child's father, the mother

should not be asked to interpret.

(i) Promote access to interpreter services in order to facilitate

the best possible communication with the child, to ensure

everything is fully explained and that there is no room for

misinterpretation.

(ii) Be clear with the interpreter about roles and

responsibilities in the process of engagement with the family.

Interpreters need to understand that their role is to translate

296

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

direct communications between the police or support person

etc. and the family members, not to talk on either party's behalf

or act as the family's representative.

(iii) Services must be planned ahead where possible to meet

the child's needs.

(iv) Interpreter should declare that there is no prior

acquaintance or relationship with the victim/witness

(v) Maintain high quality, timely, precise records along with

supporting documents; as far as possible, this should be a

verbatim record of the communication.

(vi) There should be a record of a child's interpreter needs,

including language and dialect, and whether the interpreter is

required for oral and written communication. Where an

interpreter is offered but declined by the child, this should also

be recorded.

(vii) Promote qualified interpreters who can work in

partnership in the best interests of the child.

(viii) Interpreters should be subject to references and

background checks and must sign a written agreement regarding

confidentiality.

————

CHAPTER – 4

MEDICAL AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

(DOCTORS AND SUPPORTING MEDICAL STAFF)

1. Relevant legal provisions in the Act and rules and related laws:

Section 27 - Medical Examination :

27. (1) The medical examination of a child in respect of whom

any offence has been committed under this Act, shall, notwithstanding

that a First Information Report or complaint has not been registered for

the offences under this Act, be conducted in accordance with

section 164A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(2) In case the victim is a girl child, the medical examination

shall be conducted by a woman doctor.

297

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(3) The medical examination shall be conducted in the presence

of the parent of the child or any other person in whom the child reposes

trust or confidence.

(4) Where, in case the parent of the child or other person

referred to in sub-section (3) cannot be present, for any reason, during

the medical examination of the child, the medical examination shall be

conducted in the presence of a woman nominated by the head of the

medical institution.

Rule 5 – Emergency medical care :

(1) Where an officer of the SJPU, or the local police receives

information under section 19 of the Act that an offence under the Act

has been committed, and is satisfied that the child against whom an

offence has been committed is in need of urgent medical care and

protection, he shall, as soon as possible, but not later than 24 hours of

receiving such information, arrange to take such child to the nearest

hospital or medical care facility centre for emergency medical care:

Provided that where an offence has been committed under

sections 3, 5, 7 or 9 of the Act, the victim shall be referred to emergency

medical care.

(2) Emergency medical care shall be rendered in such a manner

as to protect the privacy of the child, and in the presence of the parent

or guardian or any other person in whom the child has trust and

confidence.

(3) No medical practitioner, hospital or other medical facility

centre rendering emergency medical care to a child shall demand any

legal or magisterial requisition or other documentation as a pre-requisite

to rendering such care.

(4) The registered medical practitioner rendering emergency

medical care shall attend to the needs of the child, including–

(i) treatment for cuts, bruises, and other injuries including

genital injuries, if any;

(ii) treatment for exposure to sexually transmitted diseases

(STDs) including prophylaxis for identified STDs;

298

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(iii) treatment for exposure to Human Immunodeficiency

Virus (HIV), including prophylaxis for HIV after necessary

consultation with infectious disease experts;

(iv) possible pregnancy and emergency contraceptives

should be discussed with the pubertal child and her parent or

any other person in whom the child has trust and confidence;

and,

(v) wherever necessary, a referral or consultation for mental

or psychological health or other counselling should be made.

(5) Any forensic evidence collected in the course of rendering

emergency medical care must be collected in accordance with

section 27 of the Act.

Thus, doctors and support medical staff are involved both at

the time of rendering emergency medical care as well as at the time of

medical examination.

2. Emergency medical care.— The child may be brought to the

hospital for emergency medical care as soon as the police receive a report

of the commission of an offence against the child. In such cases, the

rules under the POCSO Act, 2012 prescribe that the child is to be taken

to the nearest hospital or medical care facility. This may be a government

facility or a private one.

This is reiterated by section 23 of the Criminal Law Amendment

Act, which inserts section 357C into the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973. This section provides that all hospitals are required to provide

first-aid or medical treatment, free of cost, to the victims of a sexual

offence.

2.1 Medical examination.— Medical examination is to be

conducted as per the provisions of section 27 of the POCSO Act, 2012

and section 164A of the Cr. PC, 1973 which states :

(1) Where, during the stage when an offence of committing rape

or attempt to commit rape is under investigation, it is proposed to get

the person of the woman with whom rape is alleged or attempted to have

been committed or attempted, examined by a medical expert, such

examination shall be conducted by a registered medical practitioner

employed in a hospital run by the Government or a local authority and

299

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

in the absence of a such a practitioner, by any other registered medical

practitioner, with the consent of such woman or of a person competent

to give such consent on her behalf and such woman shall be sent to

such registered medical practitioner within twenty-four hours from the

time of receiving the information relating to the commission of such

offence.

(2) The registered medical practitioner, to whom such woman

is sent shall, without delay, examine her and prepare a report of her

examination giving the following particulars, namely:—

(i) the name and address of the woman and of the person by

whom she was brought;

(ii) the age of the woman;

(iii) the description of material taken from the person of the

woman for DNA profiling;

(iv) arks of injury, if any, on the person of the woman;

(v) general mental condition of the woman; and

(vi) other material particulars in reasonable detail.

(3) The report shall state precisely the reasons for each

conclusion arrived at.

(4) The report shall specifically record that the consent of the

woman or of the person competent to give such consent on her behalf

to such examination had been obtained.

(5) The exact time of commencement and completion of the

examination shall also be noted in the report.

(6) The registered medical practitioner shall, without delay

forward the report to the investigation officer who shall forward it to

the Magistrate referred to in section 173 as part of the documents

referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (5) of that section.

(7) Nothing in this section shall be construed as rendering

lawful any examination without the consent of the woman or of any

person competent to give such consent on her behalf.

In the above legal provision, the term "woman" may be

substituted by the term "child", and applied in the context of the

POCSO Act, 2012.

300

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

2.2 Compensation for medical expenses :

Section 33(8) provides –

"In appropriate cases, the Special Court may, in addition to the

punishment, direct payment of such compensation as may be prescribed

to the child for any physical or mental trauma caused to him or for

immediate rehabilitation of such child."

Rule 7 provides further details in relation to the payment of this

compensation. It specifies that the Special Court may order that the

compensation be paid not only at the end of the trial, but also on an

interim basis, to meet the immediate needs of the child for relief or

rehabilitation at any stage after registration of the First Information

Report [Rule 7(1)]. This could include any immediate medical needs that

the child may have. Further, Rule 7(3) provides that the criteria to be

taken into account while fixing the amount of compensation to be paid

include the severity of the mental or physical harm or injury suffered

by the child; the expenditure incurred or likely to be incurred on his/her

medical treatment for physical and/or mental health; and any disability

suffered by the child as a result of the offence. Hence, the child may

recover the expenses incurred on his/her treatment in this way.

3. Modalities of medical examination of children:

3.1 Role of medical professionals in the context of the POCSO

Act, 2012.— Doctors have a dual role to play in terms of the POCSO

Act, 2012. They are in a position to detect that a child has been or is

being abused (for example, if they come across a child with an STD);

they are also often the first point of reference in confirming that a child

has indeed been the victim of sexual abuse.

The role of the doctor may include :

(i) Having an in-depth understanding of sexual victimization;

(ii) Obtaining a medical history of the child's experience in a

facilitating, non-judgmental and empathetic manner;

(iii) Meticulously documenting historical details;

(iv) Conducting a detailed examination to diagnose acute and

chronic residual trauma and STDs, and to collect forensic

evidence;

301

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(v) Considering a differential diagnosis of behavioural

complaints and physical signs that may mimic sexual abuse;

(vi) Obtaining photographic/video documentation of all

diagnostic findings that appear to be residual to abuse;

(vii) Formulating a complete and thorough medical report

with diagnosis and recommendations for treatment; and

(viii) Testifying in court when required.

There are at least three different circumstances when there is

no direct allegation but when the doctor may consider the diagnosis of

sexual abuse and have to ask questions of the parent and child. These

include but are not limited to :

(i) when a child has a complaint that might be directly related

to the possibility of sexual abuse, such as a girl with a vaginal

discharge;

(ii) when a child has a complaint that is not directly related

to the possibility of sexual abuse, such as abdominal pain or

encopresis (soiling);

(iii) when a child has no complaint but an incidental finding,

such as an enlarged hymenal ring, makes the doctor suspicious.

3.2 Mandatory reporting.— When a doctor has reason to suspect

that a child has been or is being sexually abused, he/she is required to

report this to the appropriate authorities (i.e., the police or the relevant

person within his/her organisation who will then have to report it to the

police). Failure to do this would result in imprisonment of up to six

months, with or without fine.3

3.3 Medical or health history.— The purpose of this is to find

out why the child is being brought for health care at the present time

and to obtain information about the child's physical or emotional

symptoms. It also provides the basis for developing a medical diagnostic

impression before a physical examination is conducted. The medical

history may involve information about the alleged abuse, but only in so

far as it relates to health problems or symptoms that have resulted

therefrom, such as bleeding at the time of the assault, or constipation

or insomnia since that time.

3 Section 21, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

302

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

Where a child is brought to a doctor for a medical examination to

confirm sexual abuse, the doctor must :

(i) Take the written consent of the child. The three main

elements of consent are information, comprehension and

voluntariness. The child and his/her family should be given

information about the medical examination process and what is

involved therein, so that they can choose whether or not to

participate. Secondly, they should be allowed enough time to

understand the information and to ask questions so that they can

clarify their doubts. Lastly, the child and/or his or her parent/

guardian should agree to the examination voluntarily, without

feeling pressurised to do so. In some situations it may be

appropriate to spend time with the child/adolescent alone, without

the parent/guardian present. This may make it easier for the child

to ask questions and not feel coerced by a parent/guardian.

(ii) Where the child is too young or otherwise incapable of

giving consent, consent should be obtained from the child's parent,

guardian or other person in whom the child has trust and

confidence.

(iii) The right to informed consent implies the right to informed

refusal.

(iv) To be able to give informed consent, the child and his/ her

parents/guardian need to understand that health care professionals

may have a legal obligation to report the case and to disclose

information received during the course of the consultation to the

authorities even in the absence of consent.

(v) Document who was present during the conversation with

the child.

(vi) Document questions asked and child's answers in the

child's own words.

(vii) Conduct the examination in a sensitive manner. It is

important that the exam is never painful. The exam should be done

in a manner that is least disturbing to the child.

(viii) Focus on asking simply worded, open-ended, non-leading

questions, such as the "what, when, where, and how" questions,

which are important to the medical evaluation of suspected child

sexual abuse.

303

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(ix) Reliance should be placed as far as possible on such

questioning as "tell me more" followed by "and then what

happened?"

(x) Do not ask uncomfortable questions related to details of the

abuse, but try to find out more about the medical and family history

of the child.

(xi) Using the child's words for body parts may make the child

more comfortable with difficult conversations about sexual

activities.

(xii) Using drawings may also help children describe where they

may have been touched and with what they were touched.

(xiii) Ensure that the child has adequate privacy while the

examination is being conducted.

(xiv) Do not conduct the examination in a labour room or other

place that may cause additional trauma to the child.

(xv) Always ensure patient privacy. Be sensitive to the child's

feelings of vulnerability and embarrassment and stop the

examination if the child indicates discomfort or withdraws

permission to continue.

(xvi) Always prepare the child by explaining the examination and

showing equipment; this has been shown to diminish fears and

anxiety. Encourage the child to ask questions about the

examination.

(xvii) If the child is old enough, and it is deemed appropriate,

ask whom they would like in the room for support during the

examination. Some older children may choose a trusted adult to be

present. Sexual abuse of children is usually not physically violent.

In the large majority of children the physical exam is normal.

A normal or non-specific exam does not rule out sexual abuse.

(xviii) As a minimum, the medical history should cover any

known health problems (including allergies), immunization status

and medications. In terms of obtaining information about the

child's general health status, useful questions to ask would be :

(a) Tell me about your general health.

(b) Have you seen a nurse or doctor lately?

304

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(c) Have you been diagnosed with any illnesses?

(d) Have you had any operations?

(e) Do you suffer from any infectious diseases?

(xix) Carefully collect and preserve forensic evidence

(xx) Clothing collection is critical when evidence is collected.

Clothing, especially underwear, is the most likely positive site for

evidentiary DNA.

(xxi) Scene investigation, including collection of linens and

clothing should be done early. Evidence from clothing and other

objects is more likely to be positive than evidence from the patient's

body.

(xxii) Children often report weeks or months after the abuse

event, and physical injuries to the genital or anal regions usually

heal within a few days. This is why the medical provider should

always consider differential diagnosis and alternative explanations

for physical signs and symptoms.

(xxiii) In the case of a child with special needs, ensure that the

procedures are explained to the child in a manner which he/she

understands and that he/she is asked what help he/she requires,

if any (e.g., a child with physical disabilities may need help to get

on and off the medical examination table or to assume positions

necessary for the examination). However, do not assume that the

child will need special aid. Also, ask for permission before

proceeding to help the child.

(xxiv) Recognize that it may be the first time the child is having

an internal examination. The child may have very limited knowledge

of reproductive health issues and not be able to describe what

happened to them. He/She may not know how he/she feels about

the incident or even identify that a crime was committed against

him/her.

(xxv) Wherever necessary, refer the child for counselling.

(xxvi) Wherever applicable, refer the child for testing for HIV

and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases

305

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

3.4 If the child resists the examination :

(i) If a child of any age refuses the genital-anal examination, it

is a clinical judgment of how to proceed. A rule of thumb is that the

physical exam should not cause any trauma to the child. It may be wise

to defer the examination under these circumstances.

(ii) It may be possible to address some of the child's fears and

anxieties (e.g. a fear of needles) or potential sources of unease (e.g. the

sex of the examining health worker). Further, utmost comfort and care

for the child should be provided e.g., examining very small children while

on their mother's (or caregiver's) lap or lying with her on a couch.

(iii) If the child still refuses, the examination may need to be

deferred or even abandoned. Never force the examination, especially if

there are no reported symptoms or injuries, because findings will be

minimal and this coercion may represent yet another assault to the child.

(iv) The child should not be held down or restrained for the

examination (exception for infants or very young toddlers).

3.4.1 Techniques to help the child relax :

(i) Offer clear age-appropriate explanations for the reasons for

each procedure, and offer the child some control over the exam process.

(ii) Proceed slowly, explain each step in advance.

(iii) Use curtains to protect privacy, if the child wishes.

(iv) Explain to parent or support person that their job is to talk

to and distract the child, and the findings of the exam will be discussed

with them after the exam is completed.

(v) Position the parent near the child's head.

(vi) Use distracters. For example, ask the parent to sing a song,

or tell a familiar story, or read a book to the child. A nurse or other helper

can do this if the parent is unable.

(vii) Use TV, cell phone game, or other visual distraction.

(viii) Do not forcibly restrain the child for the examination

3.5 Sedation for medical treatment :

(i) Sedation is rarely needed if the child is informed about what

will happen and there is adequate parental support for the child.

306

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(ii) Consider sedation or a general anesthetic only if the child

refuses the examination and conditions requiring medical attention, such

as bleeding or a foreign body, are suspected.

(iii) If it is known that the abuse was drug-assisted, the child

needs to be told that he/she will be given a sedative or be put to sleep,

that this may feel similar to what he/she has experienced in the past.

(iv) Reassure the child about what will take place during the

time under sedation and that he/she will be informed of the finding.

(v) However, conscious sedation is an option if examination and

evidence collection is required, and the child is not able to cooperate.

(vi) Speculum exam on a pre-pubertal girl should be done under

anesthesia, not conscious sedation.

3.6 The following pieces of information are essential to the

medical history :

(i) Last occurrence of alleged abuse (younger children may be

unable to answer this precisely). When do you say this happened?

(ii) First time the alleged abuse occurred. When is the first time

you remember this happening?

(iii) Threats that were made.

(iv) Nature of the assault, e.g. anal, vaginal and/or oral

penetration. What area of your body did you say was touched or hurt?

(The child may not know the site of penetration but may be able to

indicate by pointing. This is an indication to examine both genital and

anal regions in all cases.)

(v) Whether or not the child noticed any injuries or complained

of pain.

(vi) Vaginal or anal pain, bleeding and/or discharge following

the event. Do you have any pain in your bottom or genital area? Is there

any blood in your panties or in the toilet? (Use whatever term is

culturally acceptable or commonly used for these parts of the anatomy.)

(vii) Any difficulty or pain with voiding or defecating. Does it

hurt when you go to the bathroom? (indication to examine both genital

and anal regions in all cases.)

307

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(viii) Any urinary or fecal incontinence.

(ix) Whether or not the child noticed any injuries or complained

of pain.

(x) In case of children, illustrative books, body charts or a doll

can be used if available, to elicit the history of the assault. When it is

difficult to elicit history from a child, please call an expert.

3.7 When performing the head-to-toe examination of children, the

following points are particularly noteworthy:

(i) Record the height and weight of the child (neglect may

co-exist with sexual abuse). Note any bruises, burns, scars or rashes on

the skin. Carefully describe the size, location, pattern and colour of any

such injuries.

(ii) Check for any signs that force and/or restraints were used,

particularly around the neck and in the extremities.

(iii) Record the child's sexual development stage and check the

breasts for signs of injury.

(iv) If the survivor is menstruating at the time of examination

then a second examination is required on a later date in order to record

the injuries clearly.

(v) Some amount of evidence is lost because of menstruation.

Hence it is important to record whether the survivor was menstruating

at the time of assault/examination.

(vi) The same applies to bathing, douching, defecating,

urinating and use of spermicide after the assault.

3.8 Role of medical professionals as expert witnesses.— Deciding

cases of child sexual abuse would be much easier if it left clear-cut

physical evidence. Unfortunately, child sexual abuse often leaves no

such evidence. Child sexual abuse is often exceedingly difficult to prove.

It usually occurs in secret, often over a prolonged period of time, and

does not always leave physical marks; in addition to this, the child is

usually the only eyewitness. While many children are capable witnesses,

some cannot give conclusive testimony, and consequently, children's

testimony is sometimes ineffective. In such cases, the testimony of an

expert medical witness can be useful. Physicians can provide opinion

308

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

testimony that is based upon the child's history, statements, and medical

examination, even if the physician's examination of the child reveals no

concrete physical evidence supportive of the child's allegations.

(i) Courts in India in their judgments described an expert as a

person who has acquired special knowledge, skill or experience in

any art, trade or profession. Experts have knowledge, skill,

experience, or training concerning a particular subject matter

that is generally beyond the knowledge of the average person. Such

knowledge may have been obtained by practice, observation or

careful study. The expert thus operates in a field beyond the range

of common knowledge.

(ii) Expert evidence is covered under sections 45-51 of Indian

Evidence Act. The subjects of expert testimony mentioned by the

section are foreign law, science, art and the identity of handwriting

or finger impressions.

(iii) In general, whether or not the testimony of an expert will

be useful in any given case is almost always left to the discretion

of the trial judge before whom the testimony is proffered. However,

even where the court has some degree of knowledge or familiarity

with the subject, an expert's testimony may be valuable to add

insight and depth its understanding of the matter, or to educate

them as to commonly held prejudices and misconceptions which

might negatively impact upon an impartial and just decision.

(iv) In general, the opinions of medical professionals are

admissible upon questions such as insanity, the causes of diseases,

the nature of the injuries, the weapons which might have been used

to cause injuries or death, medicines, poisons, the conditions of

gestation, etc. In the case of questions pertaining to age

determination, positive evidence furnished by birth register, by

members of the family, with regard to the age, will have preference

over the opinion of the doctor: but, if the evidence is wholly

unsatisfactory, and if the ossification test in the case is complete,

such a test can be accepted as a surer ground for determination

of age.

(v) In their testimony regarding a forensic examination, medical

professionals typically describe the process of examining the

victim, the physical findings that were observed, and their

309

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

interpretation. It is important to remember that the medical

professional cannot be asked to testify to "diagnose" sexual abuse.

The doctor cannot make any definitive conclusions regarding the

degree of force used by the abuser or whether the victim

consented to any sexual activity. What he/she can appropriately

conclude is whether there is evidence of sexual contact and/or

recent trauma. He/she can state whether the medical history and

examination are consistent with sexual abuse.

(vi) In many child abuse cases, experts have firsthand

knowledge of the child because the expert treated or examined the

child. However, an expert may be called upon to render an opinion

concerning a child without personally examining the child.

(vii) However, it is important to remember that doctors are rarely

expert in interviewing, and often assume the truth of what the

patient tells them. The testimony is presented as if the doctor's

opinion is based on physical findings when it is not. It is often

largely or wholly based on statements made, a far different and

less scientific basis than objective findings upon examination.

(viii) In addition to this, opinions may be sought from mental

health experts as to the psychological effects of child sexual

abuse, such as PTSD and Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation

Syndrome.

(ix) It is for the legal representative who proposes the use of

expert testimony to establish his/her credentials, preferably listing

his/her formal qualifications. The adequacy of the qualification of

the expert and the admissibility of his/her testimony are within the

discretion of the Special Court.

(x) Before giving evidence the expert will usually have prepared

a report, either assessing one or more parties to the case or

assessing other experts' reports. His/her report should be reliable

on the basis of the following criteria:

(a)

It should provide a context in layman's terms from which

to understand the basis of his/her opinion.

(b)

It should be clear when the expert is stating

corroborated fact and when he/she is merely repeating what he/

she has been told by the alleged offender. Assertions which are

based entirely on the alleged offender's perception are

likely to be misleading.

310

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(c) The expert must review the information impartially rather

than ignore matters which are inconvenient to his/her

conclusions.

(d) The report should avoid restating incidental trivia and

give preference to examining and analysing the crucial issues

of the case.

(e) The expert should demonstrate knowledge of the process

and dynamics of child sexual abuse and help to make sense of

the child's and non-abusing parent's experiences and

perceptions. Victims and non-abusing partners of offenders

often do not act rationally and can appear collusive with the

offender, whereas their behaviour results from the control the

offender exercises over them. It is useful to have this explained

in the expert report.

(f) All professions have their exclusive language, but it is

best that the expert present the issues in language that the

court, advocate and parties can understand.

(g) The expert must not rely solely on quoted research to

support his/her arguments, and should refer to clinical

experience as well.

An expert opinion must be premised on a reasonable degree of

certainty. The expert cannot speculate or guess. It is clear, however, that

an expert need not be absolutely certain about a subject before offering

an opinion. All that is required is reasonable clinical certainty.

It is important to remember that while an expert's testimony may

be deemed relevant, necessary, reliable, and therefore admissible under

the aforementioned guidelines, it is ultimately the prerogative of the

judge to determine what weight should be afforded the testimony. No

matter how qualified the expert, the court is not bound by an expert's

conclusions and can exercise its discretion in this regard, keeping in

mind all the other evidence presented to it.

4. FAQs on medical examination.— Doctors may be faced with

some of these questions from children as well as parents and caregivers:

(i) Why is the medical examination necessary ?

The medical exam is a very important tool in evaluating sexual

abuse. The physical examination can identify both new and old injuries,

detect sexually transmitted diseases and provide evidence of sexual

311

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

contact. If done in a sensitive manner, the examination can answer any

questions or concerns the child may have and reassure the child about

their well-being and that their body is private. The exam also has

evidentiary value in a court of law.

(ii) The last time my child was touched in a sexually

inappropriate manner was over a year ago. Is the medical exam still

necessary?

Yes. Most children reveal their experience of abuse after a long

time has passed, for example, when they are older or feel that they are

no longer in danger of being abused again. Some even reveal it

accidentally. In such cases, the medical examination can reassure the

child about their well-being and address any worried the child may have

about the injuries they suffered due to the abuse. Some children may

have injuries that healed a long time ago but can be seen with the help

of special equipment.

(iii) Is the examination uncomfortable for the child?

No. The examination itself is rarely physically uncomfortable for

the child; however, what may cause discomfort is the attitude of the

person conducting the examination. For this reason, it is important that

all medical health care professionals be trained in conducting medical

examinations of children in a sensitive manner. The doctor is expected

to explain the procedure to the child and his/ her parents and obtain

their consent prior to conducting the examination, as well as answer any

questions they may have.

(iv) Can the parent(s) be present while the examination is being

conducted ?

Yes. Section 27 of the new POCSO Act, 2012 specifically requires

that the examination be conducted in the presence of the child's parents/

guardian or other person in whom the child has trust and confidence.

(v) Is the medical examination of the child conducted in the

same manner as an adult female gynecological examination?

(vi) Will the doctor/nurse be able to tell if there was

penetration?

312

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(vii) How is the examination of a boy different from that of a

girl?

(viii) Why can't a family doctor or another doctor known to the

child do the examination?

(ix) Will the child be tested for HIV/STDs?

(x) Will the doctor/nurse give evidence in court if needed?

(xi) Will the child have to be sedated for the examination?

(xii) Where will the medical examination be conducted?

(xiii) Who will conduct follow-up examinations, in case the child

needs treatment for STDs or HIV?

(xiv) What happens after the medical exam, will the child and

his/her parents be allowed to see the report?

(xv) What about the child's mental health needs?

————

CHAPTER – 5

PSYCHOLOGISTS AND MENTAL HEALTH EXPERTS

1. Relevant legal provisions in the Act and Rules and related

laws :

Rule 4(2)(e) : Where an Special Juvenile Police Unit or the local

police receives any information under sub-section (1) of section 19 of

the Act, they must inform the child and his/her parent or guardian or

other person in whom the child has trust and confidence of the

availability of support services including counselling, and assist them

in contacting the persons who are responsible for providing these

services and relief.

Rule 5(4)(v) : Wherever necessary, a referral or consultation

for mental or psychological health or other counselling should be made

by the medical professional rendering emergency medical care to the

child.

Thus, the rules made under the POCSO Act, 2012 provide that the

child may be referred for counselling either by the police or by a doctor.

313

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

2. Counsellors :

2.1 Role of Counsellors

The counsellor's duties will include :

(i) To understand the child's physical and emotional state;

(ii) To resolve trauma and foster healing and growth;

(iii) To hear the child's version of the circumstances leading

to the concern;

(iv) To respond appropriately to the child when in crisis;

(v) To provide counselling, support, and group-based

programs to children referred to them;

(vi) To improve and enhance the child's overall personal and

social development, and his/her health and wellbeing;

and

(vii) To facilitate the reintegration of the child into his/her

family/community.

2.2 Who may be appointed as a Counsellor?

Counselling for children and families at risk is an integral

component of the Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS). The ICPS

envisages the development of a cadre of counsellors to provide

professional counselling services under various components of the

scheme. Counselling may be provided under ICPS by any of the

following :

(i) CHILDLINE Service;

(ii) Counsellors appointed by the District Child Protection

Society, who will report to the Legal-cum-Probation

Officer and will be responsible for providing counselling

support to all children and families coming in contact

with the DCPS; and

(iii) NGOs and other voluntary sector organisations.

In all cases of penetrative sexual assault and all aggravated cases,

arrangements should be made as far as possible to ensure that the child

is provided counselling support. Where a counsellor is not available

within the existing ICPS framework, the State Government may secure

the engagement of external counsellors on contract basis.

314

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

2.3 Criteria for engagement as Counsellor.— In order to enable

the engagement of counsellors from outside the ICPS, including senior

counsellors for the more aggravated cases, the DCPU in each district

shall maintain a list of persons who may be appointed as counsellors to

assist the child. These could include mental health professionals

employed by Government or private hospitals and institutions, as well

as NGOs and private practitioners outside the ICPS mechanism, chosen

on the basis of objective criteria.

As indicative criteria, for any counsellor engaged to provide

services to a sexually abused child, a graduate degree, preferably in

Sociology/Psychology (Child Psychology)/Social Work is a must. In

addition to this, at least 2 to 3 years of work experience related to

providing counselling services to children in need of care and protection

as well as their parents and families and training on handling cases of

child sexual abuse is essential in order to ensure that the child receives

counselling from those qualified for and experienced in providing it.

2.4 Counselling Services under the Integrated Child Protection

Scheme: Training of personnel.— Counselling can be difficult for

children because of the nature of being a child and the difficulty in

relating to an adult, especially an adult that they don't know. Counselling

for abused children therefore requires that the counsellor is trained in

the subject and understands how children communicate. The ICPS

therefore provides that only trained professionals provide services

(including counselling) to children.

If untrained persons are holding these posts, the State

Government or the Officer-in-charge should provide for in-service

training to them. The State Government may take the help of NIPPCD,

National Institute of Social Defence (NISD), NIMHANS and recognised

schools/institutes of social work or expert bodies/institutions

specialised in child related issues for organizing specialised training

programmes for different categories of personnel. The training

programmes should include issues relating to child rights, child

psychology, handling children sensitively, counselling, life skills

training, dealing with problem behaviour, child sexual abuse and its

impact, child development, trauma, neurobiology, handling disclosure

and basic counselling skills. These training programmes could be

arranged as :

315

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(i) Orientation and training for newly-recruited staff and in-

service training for existing staff.

(ii) Refresher training courses for every staff member at least

once in every two years.

(iii) Participation in periodic staff conferences, seminars and

workshops with the various other stakeholders or functionaries

of the Juvenile Justice System and the State Government at

various levels.

2.5 Payment to Counsellors.— Counsellors employed by the

DCPU are entitled to receive their monthly salaries at the pre-determined

rates. They will be performing their duties in relation to the POCSO

Act, 2012 in the scope of their work and will not receive additional

remuneration for this work, except reimbursement of local travel costs

and other miscellaneous expenditure.

Counsellors engaged externally may be remunerated from the

Fund constituted by the State Government under section 61 of the

Juvenile Justice Act, or under any other fund set up by the State

Government for this purpose. The rates for payment shall be as fixed by

the DCPU.

2.6 Basic principles of counselling young children.— Sexually

abused children are traumatised and vulnerable. They may show certain

identifiable behavioural signs of abuse, but often, these are not

immediately obvious and will reveal themselves only over a period of

time. As a counsellor, one must be aware of the signs of sexual abuse.

Children often find it very difficult to disclose sexual abuse, due to the

following reasons :

3. Why a child may not disclose abuse

Reasons include but are not limited to :

(i) He/she is embarrassed;

(ii) He/ she does not know if what is happening to them is

normal or not;

(iii) He/ she does not have the words to speak out;

(iv) The abuser is a known person and the child does not

want to get them in trouble;

316

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(v) The abuser told the child to keep it a secret;

(vi) The child is afraid that no one will believe him/ her;

(vii) The abuser bribes or threatens the child; and

(viii) He/she thinks you already know.

Being aware of these signs would alert the counsellor to the

possibility of sexual abuse.

4. Indicators

4.1 Behavioural indicators :

(i) Abrupt changes in behaviour such as self-harm,

talks of suicide or attempt to suicide, poor impulse

control etc.

(ii) Reluctance to go home.

(iii) Sexualised behaviour or acting out sexually.

(iv) Low self-esteem.

(v) Wearing many layers of clothing regardless of the

weather.

(vi) Recurrent nightmares or disturbed sleep patterns and

fear of the dark.

(vii) Regression to more infantile behaviour like bed-wetting,

thumb-sucking or excessive crying.

(viii) Poor peer relationships.

(ix) Eating disturbances.

(x) Negative coping skills, such as substance abuse and/

or self-harm.

(xi) An increase in irritability or temper tantrums.

(xii) Fears of a particular person or object.

(xiii) Aggression towards others.

(xiv) Poor school performance.

317

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(xv) Knowing more about sexual behaviour than is expected

of a child of that age :

(a) child may hate own genitals or demand privacy in an

aggressive manner.

(b) child may think of all relationships in a sexual

manner.

(c) child may dislike being his/her own gender.

(d) child may use inappropriate language continuously

in his or her vocabulary or may use socially

unacceptable slang.

(e) child may carry out sexualised play (simulating sex

with other children).

(f) Unwarranted curiosity towards sexual act like

visiting adult sites or watching adult images or

content.

4.2. Physical Indicators:

(i) Sexually transmitted diseases;

(ii) Pregnancy;

(iii) Complaints of pain or itching in the genital area;

(iv) Difficulty in walking or sitting;

(v) Repeated unusual injuries;

(vi) Pain during elimination; and

(vii) Frequent yeast infections.

5. Effects of child sexual abuse.— Counsellors have a very

important role to play in limiting the short-term and long-term effect of

child sexual abuse. These are as below:

(i) Feeling of powerlessness;

(ii) Anger;

(iii) Anxiety;

(iv) Fear;

318

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(v) Phobias;

(vi) Nightmares;

(vii) Difficulty concentrating;

(viii) Flashbacks of the events;

(ix) Fear of confronting the offender;

(x) Loss of self-esteem and confidence; and

(xi) Feelings of guilt.

If childhood sexual abuse is not treated, long-term symptoms can

go on through adulthood. These may include :

(i) PTSD and anxiety

(ii) Depression and thoughts of suicide

(iii) Sexual anxiety and disorders, including having too many or

unsafe sexual partners

(iv) Difficulty setting safe limits with others (e.g., saying no to

people) and relationship problems

(v) Poor body image and low self-esteem

(vi) Unhealthy behaviours, such as alcohol, drugs, self-harm, or

eating problems. These behaviours are often used to try to

hide painful emotions related to the abuse

(vii) Issues in maintaining relationships

6. The language of the child : (i) The first step in counselling a

sexually abused child is to establish a trusting relationship with the child,

so that the child can communicate freely with the counsellor. Thus, the

counsellor would need to speak to the child in its own language, taking

into account his or her age, maturity and emotional state.

(ii) It is important to explain the purpose of counselling to the

child and to explain that it will include discussion about the abuse

suffered by the child. This will help the child to be prepared for the

discussion, and prevent him or her from withdrawing when an

uncomfortable topic comes up.

319

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(iii) Allow for free flow of talk without too many intensive

questions. Don't begin questioning the child immediately about his/her

problem.

(iv) Try not to be intimidating authoritarian or too patronizing.

Don't control the child's conversation - follow the child's lead.

(v) Children often lack the vocabulary to discuss sexual acts,

and it is important for the counsellor to be aware of the child's

sensitivities and difficulties before talking about sexual issues with him

or her. To gain this insight, all relevant legal, medical and family history

of the case should be collected from the Probation Officer or parents/

guardian.

(vi) While the police or other investigative agency may have

already obtained a disclosure from the child about the main incident of

abuse, the child's sessions with the counsellor may reveal new incidents.

It is thus advisable to get the counsellor involved as early as possible

into the pre-trial process.

7. How to respond if the child discloses abuse : (i) Believe him

or her. The most important thing is to believe the child. Children rarely

lie about abuse; what is more common is a child denying that abuse

happened when it did. Tell the child you believe him/her.

(ii) Don't be emotionally overwhelmed and try to remain

composed while talking to the child.

(iii) Do not interrogate the child. It can be traumatic for the child

to repeat his/her story numerous times. Leave the questioning to the

legal and police personnel.

(iv) Reassure the child that the abuse is not their fault. The

child's greatest fear is that he or she is responsible for the abuse. Be

sure to make it clear that what happened is not a result of anything he/

she did or did not do. This is particularly important when the accused

person is a member of the child's family, such as his or her father, and

the child feels guilty at having put that person to trouble. Reassure them

that prompt and adequate steps will be taken to stop the abuse.

(v) Do not make promises you can't keep. Do not make promises

such as the child will never have to see the abuser again, that nothing

will change, or other such promises.

320

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(vi) Believing and supporting the child are two of the best

actions to start the healing process. Appropriate and helpful responses

to disclosures are as follows:

(a) "I am glad you told me, thank you for trusting me."

(b) "You are very brave and did the right thing."

(c) "It wasn't your fault."

The counsellor should be aware that the effects of child sexual

abuse are long-term and can change the world view and the course of

life of the child. The first step in the healing process is for the child to

talk about the abuse, and it is the counsellor's duty to facilitate this;

however, the process of recovery may be long and the child will have

other needs that the counsellor can attend to. These include:

(i) Rapport building;

(ii) Working on the feelings of the child;

(iii) Psychological Education on safe and unsafe touches,

feelings, thoughts and behaviour, safer coping

techniques;

(iv) Helping the child to understand the abuse was not their

fault;

(v) Helping the child to develop of or regain their self-

confidence;

(vi) Provide sex education;

(vii) Encourage appropriate social behaviour; and

(viii) Help the child to identify people who can form a

supportive social environment around him or her.

The counsellor is therefore a very important tool for the child

in rebuilding his or her life after he has been sexually abused.

8. Counselling for families : Having to cope with the abuse of

their own child may be the most difficult challenge of a parent's life.

If the parent(s) can get counselling for themselves through this difficult

period, it will also help the child with his/her counselling.

321

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

8.1 Experience of parents after a child sexual abuse disclosure :

When parents first find out about their children being sexually

abused, they will experience a wide range of feelings. They may

experience denial, anger, betrayal, confusion and disbelief. Parents often

tend to blame themselves for not paying attention to their child's

behaviours or complaints earlier on. They may feel that they have failed

as parents and they didn't protect their children. For some parents they

may wonder why their children didn't disclose to them directly but to

others. Some parents also become angry at themselves or at their

spouses for not supporting the family. In addition to a wide range of

emotional experiences, parents may also experience insomnia, change

of appetite or other physical complaints.

Some parents also feel conflicting emotions, especially if the

accused perpetrator is someone they have trusted, a close friend or a

family member. There may be feelings of loyalty and love towards the

offending person as well as towards the victim. Family members may

choose sides with some believing it happened and others refusing to

believe it could have. Parents may disagree about how to handle the

situation.

If the offender is the spouse or partner of the parent, what the

relationship is like can strongly influence the parent's actions once he/

she learns of the abuse. If feelings toward the offending spouse/partner

are positive or mixed, decisions about staying together, or to divorce or

separate will be more difficult to sort through.

Parents may be faced with making decisions about whether to

continue the relationship with the offender, how to deal with contact

between the offender and the child, and re-establishing trust and

communication in the family.

The feelings a parent has toward the offender may affect a

parent's ability to believe in and support the child. When offenders deny

or minimize the abuse or blame the child the situation gets very

complicated. If a parent doesn't believe a child who has been abused

and supports the offender, there can be severe damage to the child. The

child will feel betrayed by the parent as well as the offender. What every

child victim needs is to be believed and to know that he or she is not at

322

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

fault. When the parent is able to support and stand up for the child,

the child has an excellent chance of recovering from the effects of sexual

abuse. It is very important to get help and support for their feelings

because parents reactions make a big difference in children's recovery.

Families are children's most important resource for recovery.

8.2 Coping after the child's sexual abuse disclosure :

(i) The parents should be advised to try not to completely

immerse themselves in supporting or worrying about their child. No

matter how much they love and care about their family, they also need

to consciously set aside time for their own needs.

(ii) As they are dealing with the police investigation, social

worker's interview or other professionals regarding their child's sexual

abuse disclosure, it is especially important for them to take care of

themselves physically and emotionally.

(iii) Their child needs their care and their attention during this

time of confusion and overwhelming circumstances. If they are

experiencing insomnia or depression, they may need to talk to their

doctor about treatment or seek professional counselling.

(iv) They should be advised to find diversions that will lighten

their emotional load and recharge their ability to give support. If they

have a spouse, partner or other children, they should spend time with

them. They should demonstrate to their child that there is life beyond

what has happened. This will also aid the child's recovery process and

help the child go on with his or her own life.

(v) They may find that they feel over-protective towards their

child and do not want to let them out of their sight. However, it is

important not to restrict the child's play for their own peace of mind -

the child will feel they are punishing him/her by not letting him/her play

with friends. Playing is also a kind of therapy.

(vi) The parents should allow the child, as far as possible, to

carry on with his/her normal activities and encourage the child to

participate in any activities available either at school or in the

community. This will divert the child's attention and help him/ her to

understand that things will eventually get better.

323

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(vii) As they try to deal with the sexual abuse of their child,

they may start to piece together many clues and indicators of the child

abuse that went unnoticed earlier. This information will help them to

understand what their child has gone through and the impact on him or

her.

(viii) However, it may also increase their sense of guilt and they

may blame themselves for not acting earlier. It is important for such a

parent to be told that no parent/caregiver can be everywhere all the time.

Instead of tormenting themselves, they should share with an

understanding family member or friend about their feelings and emotions;

this will help them to move on.

(ix) Where the abuser is not a parent, it is crucial for both

parents to support each other during this critical and painful time.

Blaming each other for not protecting their child will not help solve the

problem. Open or secret blaming on one of the parents will further impact

their child's sense of safety and sense of security. Their child has already

been violated and has experienced lack of safety. Therefore, it is critical

for both parents to focus on supporting the child as a team. A crisis

like this may put a strain on their relationship, especially a relationship

that has already been shaky or difficult.

(x) They naturally want to comfort, heal and protect their child

in the aftermath of a traumatic experience, but their own physical and

emotional energy isn't limitless. If they try to give too much of

themselves throughout the recovery process, they may find themselves

resenting or withdrawing just when their child needs they most. No one

person – not even a parent – can give a child all the support they need,

so they should help their child to spend, quality time with other people

who care about them and can support in their recovery.

(xi) Seeking professional counselling is important especially if

their child's or their behavioural and emotional reactions do not subside.

Seeking professional help earlier on can be very helpful. Talk to a

counsellor or a therapist for a few sessions to debrief and process their

emotions regarding the child's sexual abuse incident as well as their

confusion. A trained professional will be able to facilitate a healing and

closure for them. It is important for them to be able to find strengths to

support and reassure their child after these traumatic experiences.

324

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

8.3 Protecting the child from further harm :

Here are some ways to help protect their child from further abuse

and minimize the emotional trauma their child may experience:

(i) Prevent contact between their child and the offender until

an investigation has taken place. Explain to their child that he/

she should tell them immediately if the offender attempts to

touch or bother them again in any way.

(ii) Do not talk to the offender in front of the child.

(iii) Continue to believe their child and do not blame him/

her for what happened. Give their child support and reassurance

that he/she is okay and safe.

(iv) Respond to concerns or feelings their child expresses

about sexual abuse calmly. Listen to their child but do not ask

a lot of questions.

(v) Respect their child's privacy by not telling a lot of people,

and make sure that other people who know, don't bring the

subject up to their child. Listen to their child, but don't ask for

information on personal safety or details about the abuse. Let

the professionals do the interviewing to find out the details.

A legal case can be negatively affected if the child has been

questioned by non-professionals.

(vi) Try to follow the regular routine around the home;

maintain the usual bedtimes, chores and rules.

(vii) Let the child's brothers and sisters know that something

has happened to the child and that he or she is safe now and

will be protected. Make sure that all children in the family are

given enough information on personal safety so to be able to

protect themselves from the offender without discussing the

details of the incident.

(viii) Talk about their feelings with someone they trust - a

friend, relative, or counsellor. It is best not to discuss their

worries in front of, or with, their children.

————

325

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

CHAPTER – 6

SOCIAL WORKERS AND SUPPORT PERSONS

1. Social worker: Inquiry–

As per section 19(6) of the POCSO Act, 2012 where an F.I.R.

has been registered before the Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU) or

local police station in respect of any offence committed against a child

under the said Act, the case should be reported by the SJPU or the local

police to the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) within 24 hours.

Additionally, as per rule 4(3), a child is to be produced before

the CWC in the following three situations:

(i) There is a reasonable apprehension that the offence has

been committed or attempted or is likely to be committed by a

person living in the same or shared household with the child, or

(ii) The child is living in a child care institution and is without

parental support, or

(iii) The child is found to be without any home and parental

support.

Where a child is produced before the CWC in the three

situations described above, the relevant CWC must proceed, in

accordance with its powers under sub-section (1) of section 31 of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (JJ Act), to

make a determination within three days, either on its own or with the

assistance of a Social Worker/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC, as to

whether the child needs to be taken out of the physical custody of his/

her family or shared household and placed in a Children's Home or a

Shelter Home.

As per rule 4(5) of the POCSO Rules, 2012, the CWC should

take into account any preference or opinion expressed by the child on

the matter together with best interest of the child. Also, prior to making

such determination, an inquiry should be conducted in such a way that

the child is not unnecessarily exposed to injury or inconvenience.

This inquiry may therefore be conducted either by the CWC

itself or with the assistance of a Social Worker/Probation Officer/Non-

Governmental Organisation (NGO)/any other person found fit by the

326

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

CWC to be appointed for this purpose. Where a support person has

been appointed for the child, the same person may be engaged to

conduct the inquiry under rule 4(5) to assist the CWC in its inquiry.

The Social Worker/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC may prepare

his/her report after interviewing the child and other affected persons to

determine the following:

(i) the child's physical and emotional state;

(ii) whether the child needs any urgent care such as medical/

mental health intervention, shelter, etc.;

(iii) to hear the child's version of the circumstances leading to

the concern;

(iv) to get an insight into the child's relationship with his/her

parents or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust

and confidence;

(v) to support the child to participate in decisions affecting him

according to his/her age and level of maturity; and

2. Guidelines for interviewing the child and other affected and

relevant persons.—The interviewer should follow the guidelines in

Chapter 1 in his/ her interaction with the child.

Where the child has been found to be without family support, the

interviewer should ask the child to confirm whether she/he has a relative

or other person in whom she/he has trust and confidence to support

him/her. In this case, attempt should be made to contact such person

and inquire whether she/he is fit and willing to assume charge of the

child before a decision is taken to institutionalise the child.

Where the child had been living in a child care institution prior

to the abuse, and the abuse is alleged to have occurred within that

institution, the interviewer must confirm this with the child. In such

cases, a recommendation would then have to be made to transfer the

child to another institution.

Where the alleged offender is a member of the child's family or

shared household, the interviewer should consider interviewing the

parent or guardian or other family member of the child, in the child's

327

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

absence. The interviewer should however convey to all parties that no

assumptions have been made about whether abuse has occurred and

whether it occurred at the hands of the alleged offender.

An interview with the child could result in sharing of

confidential information. Hence, it should be conducted in a place where

the child is assured of privacy.

The interviewer should also consider other children (boys as

well as girls) that may have had contact with the alleged perpetrator

and recommend to keep the alleged perpetrator away from such children.

For example, there may be an indication to examine the child's siblings

or other children living in the child care institution where the child was

abused.

After the interview, the following details must be recorded:

(i) A summary sheet containing family details;

(ii) A record of all enquiries made about the case and the

response obtained;

(iii) A record of all contacts between the worker and the child

and his or her parents/caregivers;

(iv) A record of all contact between the worker and other

professionals, including working arrangements and agreements;

(v) A summary, to be updated regularly, on recent events and

their significance;

(vi) A report of all Court proceedings, reviews and any other

meetings, as well as any other relevant documentation;

(vii) Details of assessment and outcomes;

(viii) A record of any decisions made;

(ix) A copy of any child protection plans;

(x) A copy of all correspondence about the case.

2.1 Social Worker's/Probation Officer's/Non-Governmental

Organization's (NGO)/any other person's (found fit by the CWC)

recommendation and further action by CWC : Where the Social

Worker/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)/any

other person found fit by the CWC concludes, following his/her

328

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

interaction with the child and other affected persons that the child

needs to be removed from the physical custody of his/her parents/

guardian/care giver, she/he should make a recommendation to the CWC

to this effect.

Upon receiving the report of the Social worker/ Probation Officer/

Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO)/any other person found fit by

the CWC, the CWC has to make a determination as to whether the child

must be removed from the custody of his/her parents/guardian/ care

giver and placed in a Children's Home or Shelter Home. In making this

determination, the CWC shall take into account any preference or opinion

expressed by the child on the matter, together with all relevant factors

that may have a bearing on the best interests of the child, having regard

to the considerations referred to in rule 4(5) of POCSO Rules, 2012.

However, the CWC shall as far as possible avoid repeatedly questioning

or interviewing the child.

3. Support persons : Relevant provision–

The child must have access to support services which provide

information, emotional and psychological support and practical

assistance which are often crucial to the recovery of the child and help

him to cope with the aftermath of the crime and with the strain of any

criminal proceedings.

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012

introduces the concept of a support person, to provide support to the

child through the pre-trial and trial process. The support person is thus,

in a way, a guardian ad litem for a child. He can be a useful intermediary

between the authorities and the child.

Rule 4(7) of the POCSO Rules states :

The Child Welfare Committee, on receiving a report under

sub-section (6) of section 19 of the Act or on the basis of its assessment

under sub-rule (5), and with the consent of the child and his/her parent

or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust and confidence,

may provide a support person to render assistance to the child through

the process of investigation and trial. Such support person may be a

person or organisation working in the field of child rights or child

protection, or an official of a children's home or shelter home having

custody of the child, or a person employed by the DCPU:

329

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

Provided that nothing in these rules shall prevent the child and

his/her parents or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust

and confidence from seeking the assistance of any person or

organisation for proceedings under the Act.

Thus, the support person may be appointed either by the Child

Welfare Committee or by the child and his/her family themselves.

Rule 4(2) (e) of the POCSO Rules, 2012 states that it shall be

the duty of the police official who receives a report of an offence to

inform the child and his/her parent or guardian or other person in whom

the child has trust and confidence of the availability of support services

including counselling, and assist them in contacting the persons who

are responsible for providing these services and relief. The police official

should therefore inform the child and his/her parent, guardian or other

person in whom the child has trust and confidence of the provision for

engaging a support person to help him and his/her family through the

trial and pre-trial process, and assist them in accessing these services.

Under rule 4 (9) and (10) of the POCSO Rules, 2012 the Special

Court is to be informed by the SJPU or local police station about the

appointment and termination of support person. This reflects that the

support person also has a role to play before the Special Court. The

support person may be called upon by the Special Court to ascertain

information about the child, such as whether the child is in a safe and

protective environment, preferences of the child in a given situation.

As the support person is required to assist the child through the entire

process, she/he should also be present each time the child is required to

attend before the Special Court.

3.1 List of support persons.— The DCPU and the CWC shall

maintain a list of persons/ NGOs who may be appointed as support

person to assist the child. This could include the following :

(i) Persons working in the field of child rights/ child protection.

(ii) NGO or other organisation working in the field of child

rights/child protection, including childline and its support

organisations.

(iii) Officials of a children's home or shelter home.

330

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(iv) Persons employed by the DCPU, including :

(a) Legal-cum-Probation Officer

(b) Social worker

(c) Outreach worker

(d) Counsellor

The CWC may appoint any professional or any other person as

a support person in the best interest of a particular child. However, in

such cases, the CWC must ensure that there is no conflict of interest in

the appointment of the support person, and must also give its reasons

in writing for having appointed as support person such professional or

person.

Rule 4(10) of the POCSO Rules, 2012 provides that the services

of a support person may be terminated by the CWC upon request by

the child or his/her parent or guardian or person in whom the child has

trust and confidence, and that the child or person requesting the

termination is not required to give any reason for this request.

Thus, where the child or his/her parent or guardian or person

in whom the child has trust and confidence have reason to believe that

the support person is not acting in the best interest of the child, they

may request his/her removal. In such a case, a new support person may

be provided by CWC with the consent of the child and his/her parents

or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust and confidence.

3.2 Training of support persons : The support person should

fulfil the requirements of having basic training in communicating with

and assisting children of different ages and backgrounds to prevent the

risks of re- victimization and secondary victimization. Further, the support

person must have an understanding of the legal and Court procedures

involved in the conduct of a case under the POCSO Act, 2012. He has

to be able to render concrete support to the child and facilitate his/her

active participation, while not disturbing the proceedings by his/her

presence.

To ensure this, the DCPU must arrange for periodic training

modules to impart this knowledge to those registered with it or with the

CWC for engagement as support persons.

331

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

3.3 Payment to support person : Officials of Children's Homes

and Shelter Homes and persons employed by the DCPU are entitled to

receive their monthly salaries at the pre-determined rates. They will be

performing the functions of support persons as part of the scope of their

work and will not receive additional remuneration for this work, except

reimbursement of local travel costs and other miscellaneous expenditure.

Child rights/child protection experts and NGOs may be

remunerated from the Fund constituted by the State Government under

Section 61 of the JJ Act, or under any other State Government Fund at

rates set up by the State Government including DCPU for this purpose.

The duties and role of a support person are given under Rule 4

of the POCSO Rules, 2012. The support person is instrumental in

maintaining the link between the child and law enforcement authorities

by providing information to the child and his/her family about the

progress of the case. Further, the successful rehabilitation of the child

is dependent on the degree of sensitivity and level of understanding

with which the support persons deals with him the child while addressing

his/her problems.

(i) Establishing trust with the support person is important and

may only happen over a period of time. It is therefore advisable to

appoint a support person at an early stage and to have the same

person accompany the child throughout the whole proceedings.

The more the child feels familiar with his/her support person, the

more he will feel at ease.

(ii) It would also be useful to this end if the selection of the

support person is done via a process involving the child.

(iii) Decisions on when to carry out any interviews should as

far as possible take account of the child's situation and needs.

(iv) It is important to prevent secondary victimisation by

ensuring that the child is interviewed as early as possible.

Interaction with authorities should be as easy as possible, whilst

limiting the number of unnecessary interactions the child has with

them.

(v) Appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that the child

does not have to come into contact with accused or suspected

persons.

332

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

4. Child Protection Plan (CPP) : As stated in rule 4(7) of the

POCSO Rules, 2012 the Child Welfare Committee, on receiving a report

under sub-section (6) of section 19 of the Act or on the basis of its

assessment under sub-rule (5) and with the consent of the child and

his/her parent or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust

and confidence, may provide a support person to render assistance to

the child through the process of investigation and trial. Such support

person may be a person or organisation working in the field of child

rights or child protection, or an official of a children's home or shelter

home having custody of the child, or a person employed by the DCPU.

After the support person has had an opportunity to interact with

the child, the support person should formulate a Child Protection Plan

(CPP) in respect of the child. CPP may be submitted to the CWC and

can serve as a working tool that should enable the family and

professionals to understand what is expected of them and what they

can expect of others. The aims of the plan are to safeguard the interests

of the child, to support the child's wider family and to care for the child

and promote his/her welfare.

In cases where the child is produced before the CWC under Rule

4(3) of the POCSO Rules, 2012 , and an Individual Care Plan (ICP) as

defined in Rule 2 (h) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

Children) Rules, 20074, is being developed for the child, the above

mentioned CPP would supplement such Individual Care Plan (ICP).

4 Rule 2 (h) : "individual care plan" is a comprehensive development plan for

a juvenile or child based on age specific and gender specific needs and the

case history of the juvenile or child, prepared in consultation with the juvenile

or child, in order to restore the juvenile's or child's self-esteem, dignity and

self-worth and nurture him into a responsible citizen and accordingly the plan

shall address the following needs of a juvenile or a child :

(i) Health needs;

(ii) Emotional and psychological needs;

(iii) Educational and training needs;

(iv) Leisure, creativity and play;

(v) Attachments and relationships;

(vi) Protection from all kinds of abuse, neglect and maltreatment;

(vii) Social mainstreaming; and

(viii) Follow-up post release and restoration.

333

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

The basic components of the CPP are :

(i) Identification of current and potential sources of risk to the

child, including the position of the abuser;

(ii) Identification of strategies to protect the child and reduce

the risks over the pre-trial and trial period;

(iii) Identification of protective aspects of the child's

situation, which may need to be strengthened and developed;

(v) Consultation and negotiation with the child and his/her

parents/guardians/caregivers on the content and feasibility of the

plan;

(vi) Communication of information between all the parties

involved;

(vii) Identification of resources necessary to carry out the plan,

including family support and treatment services where required;

(viii) Consideration of the position of the abuser alleged

offender and potential risks to the child from this front;

(ix) Need for counselling the child and his/her parents/

guardians/care givers; and

(x) Need for rehabilitation and compensation.

5. Code of Conduct for Support Persons and Social Workers/

Probation Officer/Non- Governmental Organization (NGO)/Any other

person found fit by the CWC : The primary responsibility of the Support

Person or the Social Worker/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC is to protect

the child and the child's interests during contact with the criminal justice

system and to promote the well-being of the child. In general, the child's

interests are the paramount consideration, but, the Support Person or

Social Worker's/ Probation Officer's/Non- Governmental Organization's

(NGO)/any other person's (found fit by the CWC) responsibility to the

larger society or in the case of specific legal obligations may on limited

occasions take precedence over the loyalty owed the child, and the child

should be so advised.

334

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

For instance, where a worker in an NGO comes to know that a child

who has come to him/her has been sexually abused, she/he is required by

the POCSO Act, 2012 to report this to the police, even in a case where

the child expresses his/her reluctance in doing so. In such cases, the

child and his/her family should be counselled and made to understand

the obligation to report.

(i) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should provide their services to the child only in the context

of a professional relationship based, when appropriate, on valid informed

consent. Where the social worker or support person is being appointed

through the CWC, the appointment should be made, as far as possible

with the involvement of the child.

(ii) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should use clear and understandable language to inform the

child of the purpose of their services, risks related to their services,

reasonable alternatives, the child's right to refuse or withdraw consent,

and the stage up to which she will be available to support the child.

The child should also be given the opportunity to ask questions and

clarify doubts.

(iii) In cases where the child is not literate or has difficulty in

understanding the Social worker/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC or support

person, such person should take steps and seek assistance to ensure

the child's comprehension. This may include providing the child with a

detailed verbal explanation or arranging for a qualified interpreter or

translator whenever possible.

(iv) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should provide services and represent themselves as competent

only within the boundaries of their education, training, certification,

consultation received, supervised experience, or other relevant

professional experience.

335

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(v) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should be alert to and avoid conflicts of interest that interfere

with the exercise of professional discretion and impartial judgment.

A conflict of interest occurs when a social worker's or support

person's services to or relationship with the child is compromised, or

might be compromised, because of decisions or actions in relation to

another child, colleague, him or herself, or some other third party.

Potential or actual conflicts of interest are very complex situations for

social workers and support persons, or for any professional for that

matter. Conflicts of interest can occur in many different contexts. For

example, when a support person is appointed by the CWC, and such

support person in the case of a child has a family relationship with

someone in the child's family, there could be a conflict of interest. In

such cases, the social worker or support person should inform the child

and the CWC should take reasonable steps to resolve the issue in a

manner that makes the child's interests primary and protects the child's

interests to the greatest extent possible. In some cases, protecting the

child's interests may require termination of the professional relationship

with proper referral of the child to another Social Worker/Support Person.

(vi) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should not take unfair advantage of any professional

relationship or exploit it to further their personal, religious, political, or

business interests.

(vii) When Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons provide services to two or more people who have a relationship

with each other (for example, couples, family members), social workers

should clarify with all parties the nature of social workers professional

obligations to the various individuals who are receiving services. Social

workers who anticipate a conflict of interest among the individuals

receiving services or who anticipate having to perform in potentially

conflicting roles should clarify their role with the parties involved and

take appropriate action to minimize any conflict of interest.

336

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(viii) Social workers/ Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should respect the child's right to privacy. Social workers and

support persons should not solicit private information from the child

unless it is essential to providing services in the best interest of the

child.

(ix) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should protect the confidentiality of all information obtained

in the course of professional service, except in the discharge of their

professional duties. Social workers and support persons may disclose

confidential information when appropriate with valid consent from the

child or a person legally authorized to consent on behalf of the child

and whose interests are not in conflict with that of the child. However,

in any case, social workers and support persons should inform the child,

to the extent possible, about the disclosure of confidential information

and its potential consequences.

(x) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should not discuss confidential information in any setting

unless privacy can be ensured.

(xi) As provided in Section 23 (2) of POCSO Act, 2012, Social

workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)/any

other person found fit by the CWC and support persons should not

disclose the identity of the child when responding to or interacting with

the media unless permitted by the Special Court in the best interest of

children with reasons recorded in writing.5

(xii) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should under no circumstances engage in sexual activities or

sexual contact with the child and/ or his/her relatives, whether such

contact is consensual or forced.

5 Section 23 (2) : No reports in any media shall disclose, the identity of the

child including his name, address, photograph, family details, school,

neighbourhood or any other particulars which may lead to disclosure of identity

of the child. Provided that for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Special

Court, competent to try the case under the Act, may permit such disclosure,

if in its opinion such disclosure is in the interest of the child.

337

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(xiii) Further, they should not sexually harass the child. Sexual

harassment includes sexual advances, sexual solicitation, requests for

sexual favours, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature.

(xiv) Social workers/Probation Officer/Non-Governmental

Organization (NGO)/any other person found fit by the CWC and support

persons should not use derogatory language in their written or verbal

communications to or about the child. Social workers should use accurate

and respectful language in all communications to and about the child.

(xv) In the event that services are interrupted by factors such

as unavailability due to other commitments, relocation, illness, disability

or death, the CWC should appoint another suitable Social workers/

Probation Officer/Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)/any other

person found fit by the CWC or support person as soon as possible.

6. Role of Non-Governmental Organisations : Civil society

organisations [independent institutions, non-governmental organisations

(NGOs) and independent experts] have a positive role to play in the

effective implementation of the POCSO Act, 2012 not only in raising

public awareness on children's rights and in disseminating a new culture

of child-adult relationships, but also in preventing and responding to

violence against children by providing active support to reported cases

through individual and group counselling and services for rehabilitation

of abused children.

6.1 Relevant legal provisions : The POCSO Act, 2012 and

POCSO Rules, 2012 envisage the involvement of NGOs as support

persons for the child, as well as under various other provisions.

(i) Making report to police under section 19(1) of POCSO

Act, 2012 - any person, including a member of an NGO, may make a

report under this section. Many NGOs work closely with vulnerable

children and are in a position to detect child abuse. In many cases, a

child may feel more comfortable disclosing abuse to an NGO worker

rather than someone in his/her own family. An NGO that has knowledge

of the sexual abuse of a child is also bound by the principle of mandatory

reporting under section 21(1) of POCSO Act, 2012.

(ii) An NGO worker is included in the term "person of trust and

confidence". Thus, such person's presence can be requested at the time

of recording a statement before the Police or Magistrate [section 26(1)],

medical examination [section 27(3)], and Special Court proceedings

[section 33(4) and 37].

338

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(iii) An NGO worker may be appointed as a support person by

the CWC to assist the child through the pre-trial and trial procedure

(sub-rule 7 of rule 4 of POCSO Rules, 2012). Also, the parents, guardian

or other person in whom the child has trust and confidence can approach

an NGO to act as a support person (proviso to sub-rule 7 of rule 4 of

POCSO Rules, 2012).

(iv) Where an NGO is appointed as the support person, its

worker has a right to be informed under sub-rule 11 of rule 4 of POCSO

Rules, 2012 of the developments, including the arrest of the accused,

applications filed and other court proceedings. The NGO support person

in turn communicates this information to the child and his/her family.

(v) The NGO assisting a child can, under rule 7 of POCSO

Rules, 2012 file an application for interim and final compensation with

the Special Court, as well as with the Legal Services Authority.

It has been noted that victims of child sex abuse, and often their

families, prefer to approach and seek advice from an NGO even before

they report the matter to the police. Thus, in such situations, the NGO

becomes a first point of contact for the child, providing counselling,

legal advice and assistance to report the matter.

NGOs must maintain regular contact with the SJPUs and local

police stations in their areas of operation. Cooperation between the police

and NGOs would facilitate speedy action and reduction of secondary

trauma. Where an NGO is approached by a child and/or his/her parents

or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust and confidence

before the latter approaches the police, the NGO can arrange contact

with the police. On the other hand, where the child and/or his/her

parents or guardian or other person in whom the child has trust and

confidence approach the police on their own, the police can inform and

refer them to NGOs that offer support and guidance. This course of

action has been recommended for the police in many districts, and is

followed in some.

Where an NGO worker is appointed as the designated support

person under rule 4 of POCSO Rules, 2012 such person should refer to

the guidelines for support persons.

339

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

6.2 General comments : In addition to these support functions,

an NGO can also play a vital role in identifying child sexual abuse

concerns. A number of NGOs work with children closely, and are aware

of the particular problems and behaviour of each child. The NGO worker

is in a position to keep a watch on these children, and to look out for

children who are at risk of sexual abuse as well as for signs of sexual

abuse even before the child himself may disclose it. In this way, an NGO

worker can contribute to the detection of sexual abuse and to the

initiation of remedial measures, including judicial processes, in respect

of the sexual abuse.

NGOs are the primary channel for awareness-generation and

proactive monitoring of Government policies and action. They can

contribute to the objectives of the POCSO Act, 2012 by providing

technical support to children's institutions in developing Child Protection

Policies addressing issues of recruitment, monitoring, complaints

mechanism, disciplinary proceedings, and police reporting within their

own organisational or institutional setting, and training their staff in this

regard. They can also train CWC, lawyers, doctors and other

professionals who come in contact with children about the POCSO

Act, 2012 and in communicating with children. In addition to this,

they can set up education and training programmes for children and

youth. They can hold consultations with children and youth to

understand their views and perspectives on the issue of child sexual

abuse and provide them with opportunities and ways to put

recommendations forward as well as opportunities to get involved in

implementation.

In addition to this, NGOs can monitor media coverage and ensure

sensitive handling of the issue. They can also develop and disseminate

position papers and other academic and awareness materials. They can

create alliances with other NGOs, business groups, private organisations

and the local, national and regional media networks, share best

practices, submit articles, involve the press in relevant events and lobby

with the media to raise awareness with the general public.

NGOs can thus play a vital role in the implementation of the

provisions of the POCSO Act, 2012 and in general in combating the

problem of child sexual abuse.

340

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

CHAPTER – 7

CHILD DEVELOPMENT EXPERTS

Child development refers to the various stages of physical, social,

and psychological growth that occur from birth through young

adulthood. A child who has been the victim of a sexual offence is likely

to have been severely traumatised, both mentally as well as physically.

A child development expert is therefore a person who is trained to work

with children with physical or mental disabilities, to evaluate such a

child's mental and physical development in the context of that child's

experience, and to accordingly facilitate communication with the child.

1. Legal provisions : As per the definitions in the rules farmed

under the POCSO Act, 2012, rule 2(c) states :

"Expert" means a person trained in mental health, medicine,

child development or other related discipline, who may be required to

facilitate communication with a child whose ability to communicate has

been affected by trauma, disability or any other vulnerability.

Section 26(3) states, "the Magistrate or the police officer, as the

case may be, may, in the case of a child having a mental or physical

disability, seek the assistance of a special educator or any person

familiar with the manner of communication of the child or an expert in

that field, having such qualifications, experience and on payment of such

fees as may be prescribed, to record the statement of the child.

Section 38(2) states, "if a child has a mental or physical

disability, the Special Court may take the assistance of a special

educator or any person familiar with the manner of communication of

the child or an expert in that field, having such qualifications, experience

and on payment of such fees as may be prescribed to record the evidence

of the child".

Thus, the Act envisages a role for child development experts at

the stage of taking evidence from the child and recording his/her

statement for the purpose of investigation and trial under the Act. The

role of this expert is to facilitate communication between the child and

the authority concerned.

Rule 3 provides for the engagement of various experts, including

child development experts, for the purposes of the Act. It specifies the

qualifications and experience of the experts engaged for facilitating

341

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

communication with the child, stating that such an expert shall be

qualified in the relevant discipline from a recognized University or an

institution recognized by the Rehabilitation Council of India.

The Rehabilitation Council of India runs programmes in various

aspects of child development, including working with physically and

mentally disabled children. It also recognises courses run by other

universities in these disciplines.

Rule 3(6) provides that payment for the services of an expert

shall be made by the State Government from the Fund maintained under

section 61 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, or from other funds placed

at the disposal of the DCPU, at the rates determined by them. It is thus

for each DCPU to fix the rates payable to experts in various disciplines.

However, it is suggested that these rates be fixed at the level of the

State to provide for administrative consistency.

The following is also to be kept in mind while engaging the

services of an expert :

(i) Any preference expressed by the child as to the gender of

the expert, may be taken into consideration, and where necessary,

more than one such person may be engaged in order to facilitate

communication with the child - Rule 3(7).

(ii) The interpreter, translator, Special educator, expert, or person

familiar with the manner of communication of the child engaged to

provide services for the purposes of the Act shall be unbiased and

impartial and shall disclose any real or perceived conflict of

interest. He shall render a complete and accurate interpretation or

translation without any additions or omissions, in accordance with

section 282 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Rule 3(8).

(iii) In proceedings under section 38, it is for the Special Court

to ensure that there is no conflict of interest in engaging a

particular expert to provide services under the Act - Rule 3(9).

(iv) Any expert appointed under the provisions of the Act or

its rules shall be bound by the rules of confidentiality, as described

under section 127 read with section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act,

1872 - Rule 3(10).

342

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

2. General comments : The dynamics of child sexual abuse are

such that often, children rarely disclose sexual abuse immediately after

the event. Moreover, disclosure tends to be a process rather than a

single episode and is often initiated following a physical complaint or a

change in behaviour.

In such a situation, when the child finally discloses abuse, and a

report is filed under the POCSO Act, 2012 more information will have to

be gathered so that the child's statement may be recorded.

Information so obtained will become part of the evidence.

However, given the experience that the child has gone through,

he is likely to be mentally traumatised and possibly physically affected

by the abuse. Very often, law enforcement officers interview children

with adult interrogation techniques and without an understanding of child

language or child development. This compromises the quality of evidence

gathered from the child, and consequently, the quality of the

investigation and trial that are based on this evidence.

The interviewing of such a child to gather evidence thus demands

an understanding of a range of topics, such as the process of disclosure

and child-centred developmentally-sensitive interviewing methods,

including language and concept formation. A child development expert

may therefore have to be involved in the management of this process.

The need for a professional with specialized training is identified

because interviewing young children in the scope of an investigation is

a skill that requires knowledge of child development, an understanding

of the psychological impact sexual abuse has on children, and an

understanding of police investigative procedures.

Such a person must have knowledge of the dynamics and the

consequences of child sexual abuse, an ability to establish rapport with

children and adolescents, and a capacity to maintain objectivity in the

assessment process. In the case of a child who was disabled/ physically

handicapped prior to the abuse, the expert would also need to have

specialised knowledge of working with children with that particular type

of disability, e.g. visual impairment, etc.

————

343

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

CHAPTER – 8

LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

1. Free Legal Aid : Under section 12(c) of the Legal Services

Authorities Act, 1987, every child who has to file or defend a case shall

be entitled to legal services under this Act. The POCSO Act, 2012

confirms the right to free legal aid under section 40, providing that the

child or his/her family shall be entitled to a legal counsel of their choice,

and that where they are unable to afford such counsel, they shall be

entitled to receive one from the Legal Services Authority6.

In every District, a District Legal Services Authority has been

constituted to implement the Legal Services Programmes in the District.

The District Legal Services Authority is usually situated in the District

Courts Complex in every District and chaired by the District Judge of

the respective district.

1.1 Public Prosecutor.— The Protection of Children from Sexual

Offences Act, 2012 provides, under Section 32 :

32. (1) The State Government shall, by notification in the

official gazette, appoint a Special Public Prosecutor for every

Special Court for conducting cases only under the provisions of

this Act.

(2) A person shall be eligible to be appointed as a Special Public

Prosecutor under subsection (1) only if he had been in practice

for not less than seven years as an advocate.

(3) Every person appointed as a Special Public Prosecutor

under this section shall be deemed to be a Public Prosecutor within

the meaning of clause (u) of section 2 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 and provision of that Code shall have effect

accordingly.

6 Section 40 : Subject to the proviso to section 301 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 the family or the guardian of the child shall be entitled to

the assistance of a legal counsel of their choice for any offence under this

Act: Provided that if the family or the guardian of the child are unable to

afford a legal counsel, the Legal Services Authority shall provide a lawyer to them.

344

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

1.2. Child-friendly procedures : The Act provides for child-friendly

pre-trial and trial procedures to minimise the trauma felt by child victims

and to eliminate the possibility of revictimisation at the time of trial. The

child- friendly pre-trial procedures cast duties on the police and are to

be implemented at the time of reporting of offences and recording of

the child's statement. These are given in detail in Sections 19-26 of the

Act.

The child-friendly procedures during the trial are to be followed

by the Special Courts set up under Section 28(1) to try offences under

the Act. They aim to ensure that the child is protected from intimidation,

whether intentional or not. All legal representatives, whether

representing the accused or the child, must be aware of these provisions.

Given the particular vulnerabilities of children, additional measures

should also be made available and utilised even in normal circumstances.

The child-friendly trial provisions are detailed in Section 33 - 38 of the

Act.

1.3. Services that may be provided by Legal Aid Authorities :

(i) Legal representation : The abused child should be provided

with such care and protection as required by law. Any such action shall

be in accordance with the procedures established by the State Legal

Services Authority and the National Legal Services Authority. The Form

for Application for Legal Services should be provided to the child by

the police at the time of making the report under Section 19(1).

(ii) Legal Counselling : Complainants in need of legal aid/

assistance/advice in cases of violations of child rights may seek aid/

assistance from the Legal Aid Cell so that the child is able to testify in

court without fear.

(iii) Legal Advice : The Cell shall render such aid/assistance/

advice to the complainant as well as send its legal opinion in such cases

to the concerned Government authorities for suitable action. Governmental

and Non Governmental Organisations, Civil Society Organisations,

voluntary organisations, parents, relatives, concerned friends and members

of the public may, on behalf of the child in need of care & protection,

approach the Cell and receive legal advice regarding the legal rights of

the child and the means for accessing those rights. The Cell will provide

requisite information and advice to the concerned persons regarding the legal

345

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

options available for protecting the interests of the child. The Cell will

also assist the concerned in making a decision regarding various options

available to pursue the case and if required help in formulation of

complaints, petitions, etc.

Other services offered by the Legal Services Authority:

(i) Payment of court and other process fee;

(ii) Charges for preparing, drafting and filing of any legal

proceedings;

(iii) Charges of a legal practitioner or legal advisor;

(iv) Costs of obtaining decrees, judgments, orders or any other

documents in a legal proceeding;

(v) Costs of paper work, including printing, translation etc.

1.4. Mode of selection of lawyers to represent children who have

been sexually abused : The DLSA shall draw a panel of qualified and

experienced advocates to represent child victims of sexual abuse. This

panel should comprise of a mix of advocates having practice experience

of more than 3 to 5 years as well as junior advocates. Conviction,

commitment and experience in the field of child rights should be relevant

considerations for empanelment.

Advocates may initially be empanelled for a period of one year

which can be extended on the basis of performance.

1.5. Payment of Legal Aid Counsellors.— The Legal Aid Counsels

will be paid for their services by the LSA as per the approved schedule

of fees.

2. Guidance on examining child victims and witnesses.— During

criminal investigation, some minimum levels of protection are required

in relation to any interviews with the victim. These should be carried

out in a sensitive manner and advocates as well as law enforcement

officials should have received appropriate training to this end. Such

training should ensure that these persons know appropriate methods of

interviewing which will take account of a victim's particular situation

minimise distress and maximise the collection of high-quality evidence.

In order to ensure that the child-friendly trial procedures established

under the Act are optimized, the following guidance should be kept in

mind by legal representatives of a child who has been a victim of an

offence under the Act:

346

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

2.1 Before trial :

(i) List cases for an as soon as possible and avoid

adjournments : It is in the interest of the child that the trial is concluded

as quickly as possible. Prolonging the judicial process will only cause

more traumas to the child.

(ii) Ensure that communication with the child is in an

understandable language and manner : The majority of young witnesses

experience communication difficulties while giving evidence, often

because questioning is developmentally or otherwise inappropriate.

Before a child gives evidence, try having a conversation with him

outside the Court so that you have an idea about his/her communication

abilities and concentration span.

(iii) Consider what special measures may be taken in light of

the child's wishes and needs : Make whatever applications are necessary

to ensure that the child receives the benefit of existing child-friendly

measures. Ensure applications are made within time limits so that the

child can be informed of decisions before trial.

(iv) Ensure that the child is able to exercise his/her right to be

accompanied by an adult in whom he has trust and confidence : This

could be the child's parent, guardian, or other person, or the support

person appointed by the CWC.

(v) Chart all stages of children's evidence to minimize time at

court and give them a fresh start in the morning : The start of children's

testimony should not be delayed by other matters on the court list. It is

best to make an estimate of the amount of time the child will have to be

present in Court, and in doing this, to bear in mind his/her concentration

span, the length of any recording, the best time to view it and the need

for breaks. Request the Special Court to accommodate these

requirements.

(vi) Request that the child is given an opportunity to visit the

court to familiarize himself with it before the trial : This will enable the

child to experience the atmosphere in Court so that he is not intimidated

at the trial and avoid the need for him to attend early on the day of trial

to see facilities. It will also allow him to express an informed view about

special measures, so that a revised application can be made if necessary

in advance of trial.

347

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(vii) Request that the child sees or can be briefed on his/her

statement for the purpose of memory-refreshing before trial

(viii) Consider the witness's access to the building and

suitability of waiting areas : Where it is difficult to segregate young

witnesses from defendants within and around the building, consider

standby arrangements or the use of remote live links.

2.2 At trial : (i) Children have the right to be heard in any judicial

and administrative proceedings affecting them. They must be given a

reasonable opportunity to express their views all matters affecting him

and these must be taken into account. He should also be allowed to

provide initial and further information, views or evidence during the

proceedings.

(ii) Children have the right to information about the case in

which they are involved, including information on the progress and

outcome of that case, unless the lawyer considers that it would be

contrary to the welfare and best interests of the child. It would be best

if the lawyer coordinates with other persons or agencies concerned with

the child's welfare, such as the support person, so that this information

is conveyed in the most effective manner. Victims should receive the

most appropriate information on the proceedings from all their

representatives, and the assistance of a support person appointed under

rule 4(7) most often constitutes the best practice in ensuring that full

information is conveyed to the victim.

Such information would include :

(a) Charges brought against the accused or, if none, the stay

of the proceedings against him;

(b) The progress and results of the investigation;

(c) The progress of the case;

(d) The status of the accused, including his/her bail, temporary

release, parole or pardon, escape, absconding from justice or death;

(e) The available evidence;

(f) The child's role in the proceedings;

(g) The child's right to express their views and concerns in

relation to the proceedings;

348

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(h) The scheduling of the case;

(i) All decisions, or, at least, those decisions affecting their

interests;

(j) Their right to challenge or appeal decisions and the

modalities of such appeal;

(k) The status of convicted offenders and the enforcement of

their sentence, including their possible release, transfer, escape or

death.

(iii) Ensure ahead of time that equipment is working, recordings

can be played and that camera angles will not permit the witness to see

the defendant : Do not wait until the young witness is in the live link

room to run checks : Delays and malfunctions can be disruptive to the

child. Where a live link is being used during the child's testimony, ensure

that they are able to see all of the questioner's face.

(iv) Explain that the judge or magistrates can always see the

witness over the live video link: Explain that this is the case even when

the witness cannot see the judge or magistrates.

(v) Request the Public Prosecutor to himself to the child before

the trial and to answer his/her questions: Judges and magistrates may

also ask if the child would like to meet them before the trail starts, to

help to establish rapport and put the child at ease. Under the POCSO

Act, 2012 questions to the child will be routed through the Judge, and

it would be useful for the child to be familiar with their manner of

conversation, and vice versa.

(vi) Encourage the child to let the court know if they have a

problem: They may not understand a question or questions that are too

fast, or they may need a break. However, many children will not say they

do not understand, even when told to do so. Professional vigilance is

therefore always necessary to identify potential miscommunication, and

it is the child's counsel who will have to be mindful of any instance

where the child is losing concentration, feeling ill, etc.

(vii) Do not ask the child at trial to demonstrate intimate

touching on his/her own body: This may be construed as abusive. The

child can instead be asked to point to a body outline diagram.

349

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

3. Role of lawyer for the child : The Legal Aid services lawyer,

or, as the case may be, the private lawyers appointed by the child and/

or his/her family, plays a critical role. While it is the Special Public

Prosecutor appointed under the POCSO Act, 2012 who will essentially

be in charge of the trial in the Special Court, the child's lawyer is

entrusted with the task of ensuring that the child's interest is protected.

Thus, his/her role extends to representing the child, helping uncover

the nature and extent of abuse, identifying responsible parties and

securing damages to compensate the victim and facilitate the healing

process.

In addition to this, the legal aid or private lawyer should also be

able to build a good rapport with the Special Public Prosecutor, as this

would ensure that all concerns in respect of the child are raised before

the Court in the course of the trial.

(i) The lawyer must provide independent representation and

advice to the child.

(ii) The lawyer has a duty to put before the Court the views of

the child, but, should not require the child to express a view if he does

not want to do so. However, the lawyer shall not be required to put

before the Court any views expressed to him in confidence.

(iii) Where a lawyer has been appointed to represent a number

of children, some of whom are able to provide a view as to representation

and some of whom are unable to do so, the lawyer must be alert to the

possibility of conflict. In some cases the lawyer may be obliged to seek

separate representation for one or more of the children.

(iv) Adequate representation and the right to be represented

independently from the parents should be guaranteed, especially in

proceedings where the parents, members of the family or caregivers are

the alleged offenders.

(v) Where a conflict arises between a child's views and

information relevant to the welfare and best interests of the child, the

lawyer should :

(a) discuss the issues and the lawyer's obligations with the

child;

(b) attempt to resolve the conflict with the child; and

350

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(c) advise the Court of the lawyer's position and, in the case

where the lawyer is unable to resolve the conflict and as a matter

of professional judgment can advocate only the child's views, invite

the Court to appoint another lawyer.

3.1 The lawyer shall represent the child in accordance with the

child's welfare and best interests.

Where a child is :-

(i) by virtue of his/her age, maturity or disability, unable to

express a view; or

(ii) able to express a view but, his/her age, maturity or disability

are such that any view should be treated with caution; or

(iii) unable or unwilling to express a view or in any way guide

representation,

In such cases, the lawyer may be guided by the following

general guidance :

(i) The older, the child, the more weightage should be given to

the child's instructions. The younger the child, the more

representation shall be in accordance with the child's welfare and

best interests.

(ii) The lawyer has a duty to see that all factors that impact on

the child's welfare and best interests are put before the Court.

(iii) In determining what best serves the child's welfare and best

interests, the lawyer must take into account the principle that

decisions affecting the child should be made and implemented

within a timeframe that is appropriate to the child's sense of time.

(iv) The lawyer must meet with the child he is appointed to

represent, unless there are exceptional circumstances to prevent

this. The timing and venue for such meeting and any further

meetings should be at the discretion of the lawyer. However, the

lawyer shall meet with the child at a time which ensures that the

child's views are up to date at the time of the hearing, so, that they

can be taken into account by the Court.

351

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(v) As a general rule, the lawyer shall act in terms of the child's

instructions, conveying them to the Court by direct evidence if

possible, call such witnesses as are required to carry out those

instructions and examine and cross-examine and make submissions

on behalf of the child.

(vi) The Act provides under Section 33(8) that the Special Court

may award compensation to the child. The lawyer should ensure

that the child and his/her family are aware of this, and should make

the appropriate applications for interim and final compensation as

provided under Rule 7.

3.2 At a hearing, the lawyer should : (i) Identify all relevant issues

which need to be determined in regard to the child's welfare and best

interests;

(ii) Ensure that the Court has all the necessary information that

is relevant to the welfare and best interests of the child, including the

views of the child, so that an informed decision can be made;

(iii) Call evidence where appropriate (other than any Court's

witness), for example, from psychological and/or medical professionals

and teachers;

(iv) Ensure the lawyer does not give evidence himself or

herself;

(v) Cross-examine to ensure all relevant issues are fully

explored; and

(vi) Make submissions on behalf of the child.

3.3 After the conclusion of the trial : (i) The lawyer should

communicate and explain the given decision or judgment to the child in

a language adapted to the child's level of understanding. He should give

the necessary information on possible measures that could be taken,

such as appeal or other mechanisms for complaints as well as

compensation.

(ii) When a decision has not been enforced, the child should

be informed through his/her lawyer of available remedies either through

non-judicial mechanisms or access to justice.

352

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

(iii) The child's lawyer, guardian or legal representative should

take all necessary steps to claim compensation for the child. Rule 7(6)

provides that nothing shall prevent a child or his/her parent or guardian

or any other person in whom the child has trust and confidence from

submitting an application for seeking relief under any other rules or

scheme of the Central Government or State Government. Thus, if there

is any additional scheme for compensation, the child's lawyer should

inform the child of this and seek instructions on how to proceed further.

4. Child-Friendly Courtrooms and Waiting Areas : Many children

find the courtroom experience intimidating and this intimidation can

create stress in child victims. Under these circumstances, a child can be

a poor witness, and the process of navigating the criminal justice system

can compound a child's trauma. The POCSO Act, 2012 provides for a

number of child-friendly procedures to be followed in the Special Court.

In addition to this, some measures can be out in place in the Special

Court to ensure that the child is not overcome by the circumstances.

However, the rights of the accused, for example that of cross-examination

of the child, must be protected while balanced against the rights and

needs of these child victims.

Some of the ways to ensure the child's comfort is that screens are

permanently in place in the Special Courts for the witness stands for

the children. Additionally, the child-friendly courtrooms can be equipped

with closed circuit television capabilities, which allow the child to testify

in a separate room from the accused. Special waiting rooms should be

provided within the court premises to allow the families to wait in privacy

throughout the court proceedings.

————

353

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

CHAPTER – 9

GUIDE TO MANDATORY REPORTING

Section 21(1) of the POCSO Act, 2012 requires mandatory reporting

of cases of child sexual abuse to the law enforcement authorities, and

applies to everyone including parents, doctors and school personnel.

Failure to report a suspicion of child abuse is an offence under the Act.

The legislation makes it clear that the reporting obligation exists whether

the information was acquired through the discharge of professional

duties or within a confidential relationship. Any private person who fails

to report suspected child abuse, having acquired the information in the

discharge of his or her professional responsibilities, commits a summary

conviction offence.

Similarly, school personnel, doctors and other professionals may,

in the course of delivering services, receive information which causes

them to suspect that a child has been sexually abused. It is possible

that the information obtained includes the identity of the perpetrator.

The alleged perpetrator may be a person who is unknown to the reporter

of the offence, but, the suspicion could also involve a colleague,

co-worker, friend or other associate. The obligation to report is unrestricted

by any pre-condition that the complaint be first reported within the

respective departments, services or agencies, even if the perpetrator is

alleged to be an employee of that institution, service or agency. Thus,

a person who has knowledge that an offence has been committed under

the child can directly report it to the police or magistrate.

1. Why report ?

The purpose of reporting is to identify children suspected to be

victims of sexual abuse and to prevent them from coming to further harm.

Without detection, reporting and intervention, these children may remain

victims for the rest of their lives, carrying the scars of the abuse

throughout their lives and even, in some cases, repeating the pattern of

abuse with their own children.

However, the nature of sexual abuse, the shame that the child victim

feels and the possible involvement of a parent, family friend or other

close person, makes it extremely difficult for children to come forward

to report sexual abuse. This is why, the law provides for mandatory

reporting, placing the responsibility to report not on the child but on

a surrounding adult who may be in a better position to help.

354

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

[PART–II

2. Obligation to inform the child :

The Act does not lay down that a mandatory reporter has the

obligation to inform the child and/ or his/her parents or guardian about

his/her duty to report. However, it is good practice to let them know

that this will need to be done.

For example, where a doctor is confronted with a situation where

a child brought into his/her care is exhibiting symptoms of child sexual

abuse, he should inform the child and/or his/her care giver that he has

a legal duty to report the abuse. This will help establish an open

relationship and minimize the child's feelings of betrayal if a report needs

to be made. When possible, discuss the need to make a child abuse

report with the family. However, be aware that there are certain situations

where if the family is warned about the assessment process, the child

may be at risk for further abuse, or the family may leave with the child.

3. What to report?

Explain, as well as you can, what happened or is happening to the

child. Describe the nature of the abuse or neglect and the involved

parties. Be as specific as possible. Be prepared to give the name,

address, and telephone number of the child and also the name of the

parent or caretaker if known. Even if you do not know all of this

information, report what you do know. Tell all you know about the

situation.

However, the reporter is not expected to investigate the matter,

know the legal definitions of child abuse and neglect, or even know the

name of the perpetrator. This should be left to the police and other

investigative agencies.

A report of sexual abuse should contain the following information,

if it is known :

(i) The names and home address of the child and the child's

parents or other persons believed to be responsible for the child's care.

(ii) The child's present whereabouts.

(iii) The child's age.

(iv) The nature and extent of the child's injuries, including any

evidence of previous injuries.

355

PART–II]

LA GAZETTE DE L'ETAT

(v) The name, age, and condition of other children in the same

household.

(vi) Any other information that you believe may be helpful in

establishing the cause of the abuse to the child.

(vii) The identity of the person or persons responsible for the

abuse or neglect to the child, if known.

(viii) Your name and address.

4. Sanctions :

4.1. Failure to report child abuse : The POCSO Act, 2012

provides under Section 21(1) that any person, who fails to report the

commission of an offence or who fails to record such offence shall be

punished with imprisonment of either description which may extend to

six months or with fine or with both.

4.2. Reporting false information : The POCSO Act, 2012 makes

it an offence to report false information, when such report is made other

than in good faith. It states that any person, who makes false complaint

or provides false information against any person, in respect of an

offence committed under sections 3, 5, 7 and section 9, solely with the

intention to humiliate, extort or threaten or defame him, shall be punished

with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with

fine or with both. Where such information is provided against a child,

the punishment may extend to one year.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

M. GUNASEKARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (WCD).

————

online publication at “http://styandptg.puducherry.gov.in”

Government Central Press

Directorate of Stationery and Printing

Puducherry-9.